To investigate whether gestational age (GA)-related intelligence outcomes of children born very preterm improved over time.

A multicenter cohort study recruited 4717 infants born at GA <31 weeks and admitted to neonatal intensive care units between 2001 and 2015 in Taiwan. Intelligence outcomes at age 5.5 years were classified by intelligent quotient (IQ) into no cognitive impairment (IQ > -1 SD), mild cognitive impairment (IQ = -1∼-2 SD), and moderate/severe cognitive impairment (IQ < -2 SD). Trends were assessed for neonatal morbidities, mortality, and intelligence outcomes by birth epoch (2001-2003, 2004-2006, 2007-2009, 2010-2012, 2013-2015) and GA (23-24, 25-26, 27-28, 29-30 weeks).

Maternal education levels increased and rates of brain injury and mortality decreased over time. Among the 2606 children who received IQ tests, the rates of no, mild, and moderate/severe cognitive impairment were 54.5%, 30.5%, and 15.0%, respectively. There were significant trends in the increasing rates of no cognitive impairment and declining rates of mild and moderate/severe cognitive impairment in all GA groups across the 5 birth epochs. Relative to the occurrence in 2001-2003, the odds were significantly reduced for moderate/severe cognitive impairment from 2007-2009 (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81) to 2013-2015 (0.35, 0.21-0.56) and for mild cognitive impairment from 2010-2012 (0.54, 0.36-0.79) to 2013-2015 (0.36, 0.24-0.53).

For children born very preterm between 2001 and 2015 in Taiwan, the improvement of maternal education levels and improvements in neonatal brain injury and mortality were temporally associated with trends of decreasing intellectual impairment at school age across all GA groups.

To examine the association between gestational age at birth and risk of clinically diagnosed intellectual disability (ID) week by week to provide a detailed description of ID risk across the entire range of gestational ages and by severity of ID.

All individuals born alive in Sweden 1974-2017 were prospectively followed up from birth until 2017 using national registers. The HRs for ID according to weekly gestational age and gestational age categories were determined using Cox models. Sibling analyses were conducted to adjust for familial confounding.

The study included 3 572 845 live births. During the follow-up, 26 596 ID cases were registered. The adjusted weekly estimates showed a gradual increase in risk of ID from week 40 to week 24 (adjusted HR_37weeks=1.80 (1.74 to 1.87), aHR_32weeks=3.93 (3.73 to 4.13), aHR_28weeks=7.53 (6.95 to 8.16), aHR_24weeks=21.58 (18.62 to 25.00)) and from week 41 onwards (aHR_42weeks=1.26 (1.19 to 1.32)), with statistically significantly higher risks across the range of gestational age compared with infants born at week 40. The associations were consistent in mild, moderate and severe/profound ID but most prominent for severe/profound ID.

The risk of ID increased weekly as the date of delivery moved away from 40 weeks, both preterm and post-term. The results remained robust after detailed adjustment for confounding, including familial confounding.

Survival of preterm infants has been steadily improving in recent years because of many recent advances in perinatal and neonatal medicine. Despite these advances, the growth of survivors does not reach the ideal target level of the normal fetus of the same gestational age. Postnatal weight gain is often not achieved because extrauterine growth has higher energy requirements than intrauterine growth, due to the intensive care environment, illness and inadequate nutrition. Although many other factors influence infant brain development, including family socioeconomic and educational background, the role of nutrition is considerable and fortunately, amenable to intervention. In the preterm neonate, the brain is the most metabolically demanding organ, consuming the largest proportions of energy and nutrient intake for its function and programmed growth and maturation. Weight gain, linear and head circumference growth are all markers of nutritional status and are independently associated with long-term neurodevelopment. Brain development is not only the result of nutrients intake, but in addition, of the interaction with growth factors which depend on adequate nutrient supply and overall health status. This explains why conditions such as sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis and chronic lung disease alter the distribution and accretion of nutrients thereby suppressing growth factor synthesis. In this review, we will focus on the direct role of nutrition on neurodevelopment, emphasizing why it should be started without delay. The nutritional requirements of the preterm infant will be discussed, followed by the effects of general nutritional interventions and specific nutrients, as well as the role of nutritional supplements on neurodevelopment. The primordial role of human breast milk, breast milk fortifiers and human milk oligosaccharides will be discussed in detail. We will also examine the role of nutrition in preventing neonatal complications which can affect neurodevelopment in their own right.

To identify relationships between neonatal factors including conditions and treatments, nurturing environment, and psychosocial development of children born at very low birth weight (VLBW).

In this longitudinal study, the medical records of 113 VLBW infants were examined, and the children were then followed up at 18 and 36 months of age. Their developmental quotient (DQ) was assessed using the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development (KSPD), and their parents were asked about their own health, financial situation, education, and family support. Pearson's correlation and stepwise multiple regression analyses were used to explore relationships between DQ, potentially significant predictors on the KSPD, and nurturing environment.

DQ at 18 months was associated with the following neonatal factors: mechanical ventilation days (β = -.241, p = .020), Apgar score at 5 min (β = .278, p = .005), periventricular leukomalacia (β = -.218, p = .006), and treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (β = -.171, p = .048) (adjusted R2 = .32). DQ at 36 months was associated with the following neonatal and parenting factors: mechanical ventilation days (β = -.354, p < .001), periventricular leukomalacia (β = -.207, p = .009), sex (β = -.199, p = .011), mother's educational background (β = -.304, p < .001), mother's health status (β = -.159, p = .042) (adjusted R2 = .35).

These findings suggest that in addition to neonatal clinical parameters including conditions and treatments, the nurturing environment after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit influences the psychosocial development of VLBW infants.

Peri/intraventricular hemorrhage (PIVH) is a frequent cause of death and morbidity among preterm infants. Few studies have addressed the use of bundles for preventing PIVH.

To evaluate the efficacy of a bundle of interventions designed to decrease the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage at hospital discharge among preterm infants.

Pre-post interventional study with retrospective and prospective data collection performed before and after bundle implementation in the neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Infants with gestational age < 32 weeks without malformations, who survived > 6 days were included. The bundle consisted of the following actions during the first 72 hours of life: maintenance of head in neutral position with the body in supine position, minimal handling, including delay of lumbar puncture until after 72 hours and absence of respiratory therapy maneuvers. Cranial ultrasound was performed on days 3, 7 and 28, or later if needed. The effect of the bundle was analyzed through logistic regression and results were adjusted for confounding variables.

167 infants met the inclusion criteria; 146 (87%) were analyzed. Bundle implementation was associated with decreased chances of PIVH at hospital discharge (odds ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.65). Cerebrospinal fluid collection within the first 72 hours increased the odds of PIVH of any grade during the hospital stay fourfold, after adjustment for all variables included in the model.

Implementation of a bundle of interventions to avoid intraventricular hemorrhage was effective for decreasing the incidence of all grades of PIVH in preterm infants.

Background: The predictive ability of neonatal illness severity scores for mortality or morbidity in extremely premature infants has not been extensively studied. We aimed to evaluate the ability of neonatal illness severity scores [Clinical Risk Index for Babies II (CRIB II), Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology II (SNAP-II), and SNAP-Perinatal Extension II (SNAPPE-II)] in predicting mortality and short-term morbidity of extremely premature infants.Methods: This retrospective study involved 171 infants with gestational age (GA) between 22 and 27 weeks who were admitted to the NICU during 2010-2017. Predictive ability of neonatal illness severity scores for mortality and short-term morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and gastrointestinal perforation) was assessed by comparing their area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.Results: The overall mortality rate was 11.1%. Mortality at 23 weeks' gestation was higher than that at 24-27 weeks' gestation (p < .01, adjusted residual 4.5). Neonatal illness severity scores were significantly higher in infants who died than in those who survived (p < .01). CRIB II (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.00), SNAP-II (AUC 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.00), and SNAPPE-II (AUC 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) appeared to be excellent predictors and were superior to birth weight (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.95) or GA (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.96) alone in predicting early death (died on <28th postnatal day). CRIB II, SNAP-II, and SNAPPE-II were better predictors of early death than mortality in extremely premature infants. Neonatal illness severity score and short-term morbidity were not strongly associated.Conclusions: The neonatal illness severity scores were excellent predictors of early death in extremely premature infants and might be useful for selecting extremely preterm infants who need intervention.

Despite improved survival of preterm infants, there has not been an equivalent improvement in long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome rates and severity are inversely related to the degree of prematurity, but only 1.6% are born very preterm and the motor, cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric disabilities in the large moderate and late preterm population have a greater impact. The disability-free preterm adult has a lower educational achievement and income but similar health-related quality of life to term controls. Reducing the long-term neurodevelopmental impact of prematurity is the next frontier of neonatal care.