Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder affecting roughly 2% of the population worldwide. This condition manifests variably due to individual phenotypes. As the number of therapies has increased, Belgium established its own registry. However, these treatments are often inaccessible due to reimbursement criteria. This study suggests that some groups of psoriasis patients (particularly younger patients) may selectively benefit from early treatment approaches with biological therapies.

Patients diagnosed with psoriasis included in the Belgian Psoriasis Registry were included in the study. Collected data included socio-demographic changes, lifestyle changes, psoriasis-related characteristics, treatment specifics and treatment changes, and associated diseases.

Two hundred and five patients were included. Patients were classified as responders if their Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score decreased by more than 75% between the initial visit and follow-up (PASI75). 47% of patients achieved PASI75. In the short-term, 50% of patients treated with biologic therapy, 30.5% on systemic conventional therapies, and 32.25% on topicals/phototherapy responded with PASI75. At long-term follow-up, an increase in response was observed in patients receiving biologic therapy, as well as in patients undergoing systemic conventional therapy (55.5%). Patients receiving treatment shortly after their first lesions' onset had better responses (p value < 0.0001).

Intervening earlier with effective treatments improves outcomes, particularly in younger patients. Treatment algorithms should use a step-down approach rather than a step-up approach. This would enhance the number of responders and potentially reduce costs.

Mirroring the global obesity epidemic, obesity rates in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is rising. Several epidemiological studies propose that 15%-40% of adult patients with IBD are obese, and an additional 25%-40% fall into the overweight category. This article examines the pathophysiologic relationship between obesity and IBD concerning the role of visceral adipose tissue, microbiota shifts, dietary patterns, and hunger hormone changes. Additionally, increasing evidence is demonstrating the negative impact that obesity is having on disease course and quality of life in patients with IBD. Obesity has been demonstrated to be associated with an attenuated response to immunomodulators and biological agents, as well as higher rates of peri-operative surgical complications. A better understanding of the relationship between obesity and IBD can be applied to clinical decision-making in personalizing treatment plans, promoting weight loss in patients with obesity, and identifying areas of future research.

SB17 is a ustekinumab (UST) biosimilar targeting interleukin-12/23 for treating immune-medicated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The development of UST biosimilars like SB17 May help address the high cost of innovator biologics, offering affordable alternatives without compromising efficacy or safety.

This review encompasses the totality of evidence supporting SB17's similarity to UST, its regulatory approval, and indication extrapolation. It also discusses SB17's lower immunogenicity relative to UST.

The approval of UST biosimilars represents a significant advancement in managing chronic IMIDs including psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, providing cost-effective, efficacious alternatives. A randomized double-blind 28-week study involving over 500 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated SB17's equivalence to UST, with more than 80% of patients achieving over 90% improvement in psoriasis severity indices. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between SB17 and UST. Despite their potential to transform clinical outcomes, economic burdens, and drug utilization patterns, the adoption of UST biosimilars faces challenges, including concerns about equivalence and regulatory inconsistencies. Addressing these issues through education, consistent regulatory frameworks, real-world data, and ongoing monitoring is crucial for their successful integration into clinical practice.

Several disparities in healthcare utilisation and delivery are reported in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined disparities for delays in biologic administration.

This is a tertiary centre, retrospective, cohort study of consecutive adult IBD outpatients referred to the biologics clinic (BC) for initiation of therapy over 2 years. We collected patient-, disease- and service-related data in addition to adverse clinical outcomes (primary non-response, corticosteroid prescription, IBD hospital admission and surgery) within 6 months of the first dose of therapy. The primary outcome was time-to-therapy (TTT): time interval from referral to the first drug dose. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses examined associations between variables and TTT.

240 patients started biologics: 87 (36%) ulcerative colitis (UC) and 153 (64%) Crohn's disease (CD). Median referral age was 43 years (IQR 34-56) and 128 (53%) were male. Charlson Comorbidity Index was ≤ 1 in 185 patients (77%) and 141 (59%) were biologic naïve. 91 (37.9%) were White British, 88 (36.7%) Asian (Indian or Pakistani), 61 (25.4%) were from other ethnic groups. Median TTT was 76 (IQR 56-97) days. In multivariable analysis, longer TTT was associated with CD, other ethnic groups and Adalimumab. Lack of funding at the time of BC and referral age were of borderline statistical significance. Adverse outcomes at 6 months was significantly associated with C-reactive protein level > 10 mg/L (OR 2.13; p = 0.03) but not with longer TTT.

Delays in initiating biologic therapy are significantly associated with IBD type, ethnicity and therapy type. Unwarranted variation in IBD care can be mitigated by concerted initiatives to address modifiable factors for timely access to effective therapies.

Biologics are increasingly essential in managing inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) worldwide, as they can modify disease progression and improve patients' quality of life. This study aimed to analyze the global prevalence of and geographic variations in the use of biological drugs for IBD.

Articles published up to 21 July 2024, were identified from the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, IBECS, WPRIM, BRISA/RedETSA and LILACS databases. Population-based studies (cohort, case-control and cross-sectional) and studies using administrative databases with data on the prevalence of biological medicine use in patients with IBD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, whereas heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2.

Of the 8239 titles, 68 (n = 3,482,385 patients) were included. An increase in the number of studies on the subject has been reported since 2017, and these studies have been mostly concentrated in high-income countries. A 15.06% (95% CI 11.84-18.28%) prevalence of biologic use in IBD worldwide was reported, predominantly concentrated in the use of anti-TNF agents 15.01% (95% CI 10.35-19.67%). Furthermore, patients with Crohn's disease (CD) had a greater prevalence of biologic use (21.41%; 95% CI 16.31-26.50%) than ulcerative colitis (UC) patients (9.70%; 95% CI 6.20-13.18%).

Further studies using population-based and administrative data and stratifying their analyses by disease type are required to confirm our findings. Future studies should be conducted in Latin America, Asia and Africa.

In this nationwide study, we aimed to explore healthcare services utilization, medical management, and disease outcomes of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) across the 2 major ethnic groups in Israel.

We utilized a cohort including all patients diagnosed with IBD in Israel since 2005. The primary outcome was steroid dependency, with secondary outcomes including use of biologics, time to surgery, and hospitalizations. Outcomes were controlled for possible inherent differences in disease course and phenotype.

Of the 32 491 included patients, 18 252 (56%) had Crohn's disease (CD) and 14 239 (44%) had ulcerative colitis (UC); 10% were Arabs and 90% were Jews. Jewish ethnicity was associated with lower rates of steroid dependency compared to Arab ethnicity in both CD (HR = 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6-0.8]) and UC (HR = 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6-0.8]). The risk of IBD-related surgery in CD was higher in the Arab group at both 3 and 5 years (13% vs. 10%, 16% vs 14%, respectively, P = .005). Arabs had more frequent IBD-related hospitalizations than Jews at 5 years (28% vs. 19% with at least 2 hospitalizations, P < .001). In contrast, Jewish ethnicity was associated with more frequent use of biologics during the first year from diagnosis in patients with CD (HR = 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.6]) but not with UC.

Arab ethnicity is associated with higher rates of hospitalizations, steroid dependency, and surgeries, and, on the other side, with lower utilization of biologics. Healthcare practitioners and policymakers should address potential cultural and systemic barriers in healthcare delivery in order to improve care across all populations.

Antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose escalation is performed to improve therapeutic response and optimize outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to describe the durability of anti-TNF therapy in patients with CD receiving escalated anti-TNF therapy, along with the overall durability of anti-TNF treatment between patients managed with a proactive versus reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) approach.

We undertook a retrospective multicentre cohort study. One center practiced proactive TDM with a weekly virtual TDM clinic, while the other practiced reactive TDM. Patients receiving escalated infliximab or adalimumab therapy for CD from January 2015 to April 2022 were included. Durability was defined as the time from biologic start to cessation for treatment failure.

About 239 patients (45% female, median age 39) meeting criteria for inclusion were identified. About 165 patients were included in the proactive TDM cohort and 74 in the reactive TDM cohort.Anti-TNF naïve patients had significantly higher durability of therapy when compared with the anti-TNF exposed patients for both overall durability (P = .045) and durability postescalation (P = .017). The proactive TDM cohort had significantly higher durability when compared with the reactive cohort for both overall durability (P = .001) and durability postescalation (P = .002).

This multicentre, retrospective cohort study illustrates the importance of dose escalation as a therapeutic strategy in IBD care. The durability of anti-TNF therapy is superior in anti-TNF naïve compared to exposed patients and can be improved further by proactive TDM to guide dose optimization.

Background: Specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs), such as maresins and resolvins, play a key role in resolving inflammation and repairing tissues. This study aimed to evaluate whether maresin-1 (MaR1) and resolvin-D1 (RvD1) could serve as serum non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 60 UC patients (30 active, 30 remission) and 30 healthy controls. Disease activity was assessed using the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES). Inflammatory indices, including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-HDL cholesterol ratio (MHR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), CRP-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), CRP-albumin ratio (CAR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were calculated. Plasma MaR1 and RvD1 levels were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate biomarker accuracy. Results: CRP, NLR, PLR, CLR, CAR, SIRI, and SII were significantly elevated in active UC, whereas MaR1 and RvD1 were lower compared to remission and controls (p < 0.05). MaR1 levels were lower in the remission group than in controls. ROC analysis demonstrated high area under the curve (AUC) values for RvD1 (0.906), CAR (0.872), CLR (0.861), and CRP (0.858) in distinguishing active UC from remission, and for CRP (0.944), CAR (0.939), CLR (0.939), RvD1 (0.928), and MaR1 (0.889) in distinguishing active UC from controls. The specificity for detecting active UC was 60% for MaR1 and 80% for RvD1. Both RvD1 and MaR1 showed a negative correlation with the MES, with RvD1 demonstrating a stronger correlation (r = -0.754, p < 0.001). Conclusions: RvD1 shows a strong negative correlation with disease severity in ulcerative colitis, while low MaR1 levels in remission may indicate subclinical inflammation. Although MaR1 and RvD1 are not disease-specific, their role in inflammation resolution suggests they may complement conventional inflammatory markers for more comprehensive UC monitoring.

Data indicate that earlier initiation of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) biologic medicines may prevent progression to irreversible bowel damage and improve outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly Crohn's disease. However, the high cost of such therapies may restrict access and prevent timely treatment of IBD. Biosimilar anti-TNF-α medicines may represent a valuable opportunity for cost savings and optimized patient outcomes by improving access to advanced therapies and allowing earlier anti-TNF-α treatment initiation. Biosimilar anti-TNF-α medicines have been shown to offer consistent therapeutic outcomes to their reference medicines, yet despite entering the IBD treatment armamentarium over 10 years ago, their implementation in clinical practice remains suboptimal. Factors limiting the 'real' use of biosimilar anti-TNF-α medicines may include an ongoing lack of understanding and acceptance of biosimilars by both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients, as well as systemic factors such as formulary decisions outside of the control of the prescriber. In this review, an expert panel of gastroenterologists discusses HCP-level considerations to improve biosimilar anti-TNF-α utilization in IBD in order to support early anti-TNF-α initiation and maximize patient outcomes.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic inflammatory disorders influenced by microbial, environmental, genetic, and immune factors. The introduction of biological agents has transformed IBD therapy, improving symptoms, reducing complications, and enhancing patients' quality of life. However, approximately 30% of patients exhibit primary non-response, and 50% experience a loss of response over time. Genetic and non-genetic factors contribute to variability in treatment outcomes. This systematic review aims to thoroughly analyze and assess existing studies exploring the relationships between genetic variations and individual responses to biologic drugs, in order to identify genetic markers that are predictive of treatment efficacy, risk of adverse effects, or drug toxicity, thereby informing clinical practice and guiding future research. PubMed and EMBASE papers were reviewed by three independent reviewers according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines. Of the 883 records screened, 99 met the inclusion criteria. The findings of this review represent an initial step toward personalized medicine in IBD, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in biological therapy.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic or recurrent inflammatory disorder affecting various parts of the gastrointestinal tract. Metformin, a widely prescribed hypoglycemic drug for type 2 diabetes, has shown potential in reducing IBD risk. However, its oral administration faces significant challenges due to the harsh gastrointestinal environment, requiring higher or more frequent doses to achieve therapeutic effects, which increases the risk of side effects. To address this, we developed alginate-shelled hydrogel microcapsules with a thin oil layer for targeted intestinal delivery of metformin. The oil layer protects metformin from gastric acid and ensures its release specifically in the intestines. In a dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis mouse model, metformin-loaded hydrogel microcapsules (MHM) significantly reduced disease activity, intestinal epithelial damage, and macrophage infiltration linked to pro-inflammatory cytokine factors. Additionally, MHM improved dysbiosis of specific bacterial genera, including Bacteroides vulgatus, Lactobacillus (L.) gasseri, L. reuteri, and L. intestinalis, optimizing the abundance and composition of microorganisms. These findings indicate that encapsulating metformin within alginate shelled-microcapsules with a thin oil layer presents a potential delivery system for IBD treatment.

Biases in healthcare pose challenges for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients from underrepresented races and ethnicities. Our study aimed to assess the quality of and access to care among underrepresented racial and ethnic populations using a diverse database.

We used the OneFlorida Data Trust, representing over half of Florida's population. We performed a retrospective study from 2012 to 2020. Advanced IBD therapies included a prescription of at least 1 biologic agent or tofacitinib. Disease activity markers included C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin (Hgb), albumin, and white blood cell (WBC). Regression analyses compared the rates of medication use, healthcare utilization, and disease severity by race and ethnicity. Geographic distribution of advanced IBD therapy was analyzed at the county level.

Our study included 10 578 patients. Hispanic patients utilized more biologics than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.3, P < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients utilized more steroids than NHW (OR: 1.2, P = .0004). Hispanics had fewer visits to emergency departments (EDs) and fewer admissions compared with NHW (OR: 0.7 and 0.6, respectively; P < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients visited ED more frequently than NHW patients (OR: 1.3, P < .0001). Hispanics had lower disease activity markers than NHW based on CRP (OR: 0.5, P = .005), Hgb (OR: 0.4, P < .0001), albumin (OR: 0.7, P < .0001), and WBC (OR: 0.5, P < .0001). Geographic distribution of advanced IBD therapy showed clustered areas in southern and northern Florida.

Our data show an improved access to care pattern in Hispanic patients. However, disparities still exist, and this is evident in the healthcare utilization trends observed among non-Hispanic Black patients.

Background/Objectives: Crohn's disease (CD) is a progressive condition, and early treatment with infliximab combined with an immunosuppressant within six months has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. However, the impact of early ustekinumab (UST) use in biologic-naïve CD patients remains unclear. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the clinical outcomes of early UST intervention in such patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included biologic-naïve CD patients treated with UST, with a clinical follow-up period of at least six months from October 2020 to January 2024 across four medical centers. Patients who received UST within six months of CD diagnosis were categorized into the Early-UST group, while those who were initially treated with conventional therapies and subsequently received UST after six months were assigned to the control group. The primary endpoint was the improvement of clinical outcomes at six months. Results: A total of 60 biologic-naïve CD patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. At six months, the Early-UST group (n = 24) demonstrated significantly lower Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores (73.03 vs. 112.42, p = 0.038), lower Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) scores (1.46 ± 1.69 vs. 2.72 ± 2.17, p = 0.020), higher rates of clinical remission (91.7% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.017), and higher rates of steroid-free clinical remission (79.2% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.031) compared to the control group (n = 36). At one year, the early-UST group continued to exhibit lower CDAI scores (39.94 vs. 91.48, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Initiating ustekinumab within six months of CD diagnosis is associated with improved clinical outcomes and enhanced quality of life in biologic-naïve Crohn's disease patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, involves chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Current immune-modulating therapies are insufficient for 30-50% of patients or cause significant side effects, emphasizing the need for new treatments. Targeting the innate immune system and enhancing drug delivery to inflamed gut regions are promising strategies. Neutrophils play a central role in IBD by releasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) -DNA-based structures with cytotoxic proteins-that contribute to mucosal damage and inflammation. Recent studies linking ROS production, DNA repair, and NET formation have identified NETs as potential therapeutic targets, with preclinical models showing positive outcomes from NET inhibition. Innovative oral drug delivery systems designed to target gut inflammation directly-without systemic absorption-could improve treatment precision and reduce side effects. Advanced formulations utilize properties such as particle size, surface modifications, and ROS-triggered release to selectively target the distal ileum and colon. A dual strategy that combines a deeper understanding of IBD pathophysiology to identify inflammation-related therapeutic targets with advanced drug delivery systems may offer significant promise. For instance, pairing NET inhibition with ROS-responsive nanocarriers could enhance treatment efficacy, though further research is needed. This synergistic approach has the potential to greatly improve outcomes for IBD patients.

The clinical characteristics of de novo inflammatory bowel disease (dnIBD) diagnosed after solid organ transplant (SOT) are not well-described, particularly since the advent of biologic therapy for treatment of IBD.

We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of SOT recipients between 2010 and 2022 at the University of Minnesota Medical Center who were diagnosed with IBD after transplant.

Of 89 patients at our center with IBD and a history of SOT, five (5.6%) patients were diagnosed with IBD post-transplant (three liver, one kidney, and one simultaneous liver and kidney): three patients were female and four were Caucasian. Mean age at transplant and IBD diagnosis were 46.7 and 49.4 years respectively. Indication for transplant were alcohol-related cirrhosis (n = 2), idiopathic fulminant hepatic failure (n = 1), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (n = 1), and IgA nephropathy (n = 1). Four patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) and one with Crohn's disease (CD). Three patients (all with UC) required escalation to a biologic therapy. Four patients were in clinical remission from IBD at last follow-up, one patient required IBD surgery, while there was no rejection and no deaths following IBD diagnosis.

dnIBD post-SOT is uncommon, while newer IBD therapies may be safe and effective. Further study is required to better understand the natural history and IBD outcomes of this population relative to non-SOT patients.

With 20-40% of patients who have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) not responding to therapy, resource use and costs can be high. We performed a descriptive analysis of health-care data for IBD management in the National Health Service to explore potential areas for improvement.

In this exploratory study, we analysed real-world data from the Discover dataset for adults with a diagnosis of incident IBD recorded in northwest London, UK, between 31 March, 2016, and 31 March, 2020. We compared mean visit numbers and primary and secondary care costs per patient to examine resource use and costs for active disease versus remission.

We included 7,733 patients (5,872 with ulcerative colitis [UC], 1,427 with Crohn's disease [CD], and 434 with codes for both [termed IBD-undefined in this study]). Remission was recorded in 19,218 (82%) of 23,488 observations for UC, 4,686 (82%) of 5,708 for CD, and 1,122 (65%) for IBD-undefined observations. Health-care resource use was significantly higher with active disease in all settings except primary care for UC. Total health-care costs were greater with active disease than remission for all diagnoses (all p < 0.0001). The main driver of costs was inpatient hospital care among those with active disease; elective inpatient costs were high among patients with UC and IBD-undefined in remission.

Higher health-care resource use and costs were observed with active disease, which underscores the importance of early induction and maintenance of remission in UC and CD. Updated strategies that incorporate treat to target may offer cost benefits by the offsetting of biologic drug costs with a reduction in costly inpatient hospital stays.

This trial was not registered as it used pseudonymised retrospective data.

In the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we have biologic therapies administered intravenously and subcutaneously. Recently, some drugs can be administered by either of these routes. The real impact that intravenous administration has on the perception of the disease and the personal and work life of the patient is unknown.

All IBD patients receiving intravenous infliximab treatment for at least 6 months were anonymously invited to participate. They were provided with a specific structured questionnaire with visual analogue scales (0-10) at two reference centers in the Barcelona area.

A total of 90 patients with a median age of 45 years (36-56) and a median infliximab treatment duration of 48 months (24-84) were included. The visit and therapy with infliximab in the day hospital were globally well evaluated (9, IQR 7-10). 78% of patients combined day hospital stays with other activities (26% employment). The personal impact was generally low (4, IQR 0-5.8), but the patient's job was threatened in 43% of patients on intensified treatment.

The intravenous administration of biologic drugs on an outpatient basis is highly satisfactory among IBD patients. The impact on the work sphere appears to be more pronounced than on the personal sphere, an aspect that should be considered in shared decision-making with the patient.

A need for better treatment options for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) persists because of the efficacy and safety limitations of current therapies. Neutrophil epithelial transmigration is associated with the characteristic colonic mucosal inflammation in and very likely involved with the pathogenesis and clinical symptoms of UC. ADS051 is a small-molecule inhibiting neutrophil migration and activation, which are potentially important therapeutic targets in UC. The phase 1 single ascending dose study evaluated ADS051's safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.

Fifty healthy adults were randomized 4:1 into 5 ascending dose cohorts to receive a single oral dose of ADS051 100 mg, 300 mg, 700 mg, 1,500 mg, 3,500 mg, or placebo. Participants were followed until 30 days after dosing. Safety and pharmacokinetics of ADS051 in stool, blood, and urine were evaluated.

ADS051 was safe and well-tolerated. Adverse events (AEs) of constipation were reported by 2 participants (5.0%) in the ADS051 1,500 mg group vs none in the placebo group. No serious AEs reported and no discontinuations due to AEs. In all dose groups, a cumulative average of 10%-24% of the ADS051 dose was recovered in stool, mostly within 48 hours after dosing. ADS051 was quantifiable in only 2 of 440 blood samples (7.64 and 69.8 ng/mL). On average, <0.035% of the ADS051 dose was excreted in urine.

ADS051 was safe, well-tolerated, and achieved high stool concentrations with minimal systemic exposure. ADS051 could be a safe and effective, locally acting, neutrophil-targeting agent for the treatment of UC.

Alimentary tract inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is treated by systemically administered drugs that alter fundamental host immune responses. Biologics that target tumor necrosis factor (TNF) are first-line biologics in IBD, used widely for their effectiveness, steroid-sparing quality, and lower cost. While they enable a significant proportion of patients to achieve clinical remission, they carry an increased risk of infection and poor serological responses to vaccination. Conversely, our understanding of adaptive T cell responses in anti-TNF-treated IBD patients remains limited. The introduction of COVID-19 vaccines has prompted research that both challenges and refines our view on immunomodulatory therapy and its potential implications for immunity and protection. Here, we review these emergent findings, evaluate how they shape our understanding of vaccine-induced T cell responses in the context of anti-TNF therapy in IBD, and provide a perspective highlighting the need for a holistic evaluation of both cellular and humoral immunity in this population.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) mediated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes are a series of life-threatening conditions with a mortality of 4%-20%. The clinical application of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonist improves the outcome of some SCARs patients; however, this is complicated by the elusive and varied immunopathogenesis.

To investigate whether IgE antibody responses to HEMAs are associated with AD, its severity, and response to dupilumab.

To clarify the precise process and optimize the therapy regimen of SCARs, we performed single-cell sequencing, in vitro functional and clinical analysis of patients with SCARs.

We observed that TNF-α breaks drug-specific T-cell tolerance by inhibiting the expression of V-type immunoglobulin domain-containing suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA). Furthermore, TNF-α generated a positive feedback loop in the early phase of drug-specific T-cell activation, whereby B cells acted reciprocally on the corresponding T cells to reinforce TNF-α cytokine expression. In contrast, this pathway of TNF-α-VISTA signaling did not operate in memory effector T cells. Drug-specific memory effector T-cell responses were inhibited by increasing Treg cell expression in a negative feedback loop, with TNF-α antagonists preventing the inhibitory effect. These observations align with the clinical analysis that early but not late intervention with TNF-α antagonists significantly improved outcomes in SCARs patients.

Our findings defining feedback regulation of VISTA and Treg cells by TNF-α in different stages of the drug-specific T-cell response and, indicate that a Treg agonists, instead of TNF-α antagonists, could be used for treatment of patients with progressive SCARs.

There is limited real-world evidence comparing the effectiveness of ozanimod to vedolizumab as first-line advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional US database in adults with UC who were initiated on ozanimod compared to vedolizumab between January 1, 2021 and 22 June, 2024. The primary outcome was to compare the risk of a composite outcome of corticosteroid use, colectomy, or change to another advanced therapy between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for demographics, comorbid conditions, disease extent, laboratory parameters, and previous corticosteroid use. The risk was expressed as an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% CIs.

We identified 222 patients in the ozanimod cohort (mean age 41.2 ± 15.7, 46.3% male sex, 68% White, and 22.5% ulcerative proctitis), and 4145 patients in the vedolizumab cohort (mean age 47.4 ± 18.3, 45.2% male sex, 69.7% White, and 17.2% ulcerative proctitis). After PSM, there was no significant difference in the risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.63-1.36) and corticosteroid use (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.53-1.18) between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. There was a higher risk of change in therapy in the ozanimod cohort (aOR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.09-3.49) compared to the vedolizumab cohort. Colectomy rates were low in both cohorts (<0.04%).

Our real-world study showed that ozanimod use is associated with similar corticosteroid use but higher odds of a change in therapy compared to vedolizumab when used as first-line therapy in patients with UC. Further prospective studies are needed to understand long-term outcomes.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Arthritis (IBD-associated arthritis) poses a significant challenge, intertwining the complexities of both inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and arthritis, significantly compromising patient quality of life. While existing medications offer relief, these drugs often initiate adverse effects, necessitating the requirement for safer therapeutic alternatives. Artemisia herba-alba, a traditional medicinal plant known for its anti-inflammatory properties, emerges as a potential candidate. Our computational study focused on examining 20 bioactive compounds derived from A. herba-alba for potential treatment of IBD-associated arthritis. These compounds detected in A. herba-alba include camphor, alpha-thujone, eucalyptol, cis-chrysanthenyl acetate, vicenin-2, 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid, chlorogenic acid, hispidulin, isoschaftoside, isovitexin, patuletin-3-glucoside, vanillic acid, rutin, schaftoside, lopinavir, nelfinavir, quercetin, artemisinin, gallic acid, and cinnamic acid. Following rigorous analysis encompassing pharmacokinetics, toxicity profiles, and therapeutic targets, compounds with favorable, beneficial characteristics were identified. In addition, comparative analysis with disease-gene associations demonstrated the interconnectedness of inflammatory pathways across diseases. Molecular docking studies provided mechanistic insights indicating this natural plant components potential to modulate critical inflammatory pathways. Overall, our findings indicate that A. herba-alba-derived compounds may be considered as therapeutic agents for IBD-associated arthritis, warranting further experimental validation and clinical exploration.

A prior survey disseminated in 2017 identified that healthcare access barriers exist and significantly affect patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We sought to identify, through an updated survey, the healthcare access barriers that patients continue to face, with a focus on socioeconomic factors and patient awareness of resources to navigate existing barriers.

A 52-question online survey evaluating (1) access to healthcare professionals, medications, and procedures; (2) associated financial challenges; and (3) patient awareness of education and advocacy tools to navigate IBD care barriers, was disseminated through multiple channels to IBD patients and their caregivers.

Of the 2281 completed responses, patients on advanced specialty medications, younger than 65 years of age, or on employer insurance experienced significantly greater issues with insurance barriers to accessing medications and coverage of medically necessary tests/treatments. Patients who live in areas of concentrated poverty were more likely to experience poor health outcomes when subjected to step therapy compared to patients who did not. Additionally, patients were more likely to experience one or more financial barriers or trade-offs if the patient used an advanced specialty medicine or lived in an area with concentrated poverty.

While there have been significant and numerous advancements in IBD treatments, patients with IBD continue to experience barriers to healthcare access and treatment and financial struggles. Ongoing awareness and advocacy efforts focused on healthcare system reform and related policies to further minimize care disparities and barriers remain vital.

Chronic intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can lead to the development of fibrosis and the formation of strictures. Endoscopic balloon dilation and surgical resection are currently the only available treatments for fibrotic strictures. However, both strategies are associated with potential complications and high rates of stricture recurrence, necessitating additional procedures and/or multiple surgical resections. IBD therapeutic modalities aimed at inflammation, including anti-inflammatory agents, such as corticosteroids, biologics and small molecules, have shown limited efficacy in altering the natural history of strictures, ameliorating fibrosis progression, or preventing recurrences. New and innovative therapeutic approaches targeted at fibrosis are urgently needed. Herein, we provide an overview of emerging therapeutics, including novel drug delivery systems, for the management of intestinal fibrosis and strictures.

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) typically receive a targeted inflammatory bowel disease therapy after treatment with conventional therapies and after the development of significant morbidity. Evidence suggests that early biologic treatment after diagnosis could improve treatment response and prevent disease complications compared with delayed biologic treatment after conventional therapy.

RALEE was a retrospective study using claims data from IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019. Adults with UC and at least one claim for vedolizumab were categorized into Early or Delayed Vedolizumab groups according to whether they had received vedolizumab within 30 days of diagnosis or after conventional therapy (5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators), respectively. Treatment response was assessed at 2, 6, and 12 months after vedolizumab treatment initiation and was analyzed with logistic regression (bivariate).

At 2 months, Delayed Vedolizumab was associated with significantly higher odds of nonresponse than Early Vedolizumab (odds ratio [OR], 2.509; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-4.90). Delayed Vedolizumab was not significantly associated with odds of nonresponse at 6 months (OR, 1.173; 95% CI, 0.72-1.90) or at 12 months (OR, 0.872; 95% CI, 0.55-1.37). Mean total healthcare costs were similar in the Early Vedolizumab ($6492) and Delayed Vedolizumab ($5897) groups, although there were small differences in costs from different types of claims.

Patients who received vedolizumab early after UC diagnosis were less likely to experience nonresponse at 2 months and incurred similar healthcare costs at 12 months compared with patients who received delayed vedolizumab.

Patient satisfaction has been positively associated with adherence which is expected to impact outcomes. Although vital for successful implementation of biosimilar medicines, little is known about the patient perspective of transition.

The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes and patient experience of transitioning between reference adalimumab and a biosimilar (SB5).

iBaSS is a phase IV single-centre, prospective, randomised, single-blind, cross-over study in adult subjects with Crohn's disease. Participants, stable on adalimumab before consent, received 24 weeks of treatment with both reference adalimumab and SB5. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining baseline clinical status throughout each treatment period, with patients' perspective of disease control and treatment satisfaction assessed as secondary outcomes.

A total of 112 participants, representative of the heterogeneous patient populations encountered in routine clinical practice, were enrolled. A similar proportion of participants maintained baseline clinical status through each treatment period: 81.8% with reference adalimumab and 79.5% with SB5. Patient reported outcomes (IBD-Control questionnaire (SB5: 15.5; reference adalimumab 15) and TSQM), adverse events and therapeutic drug monitoring remained consistent through both treatment periods, although a higher median injection pain VAS score was noted with SB5 (53/100 versus 6/100 with reference adalimumab). The number of switches undertaken in the study did not impact serum drug concentration or immunogenicity.

This study, mimicking real world adalimumab transition, demonstrates that patients undertaking brand transition can be expected to have consistent clinical and satisfaction outcomes.

Number 2018-004967-30.

Data regarding care access and outcomes in Black/Indigenous/People of Color/Hispanic (BIPOC/H) individuals is limited. This study evaluated care barriers, disease status, and outcomes among a diverse population of White/non-Hispanic (W/NH) and BIPOC/H inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at a large U.S. health system.

An anonymous online survey was administered to adult IBD patients at Ochsner Health treated between Aug 2019 and Dec 2021. Collected data included symptoms, the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and Barriers to Care surveys, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) via the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, the Medication Adherence Rating Scale-4, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Medical record data examined healthcare resource utilization. Analyses compared W/NH and BIPOC/H via chi-square and t tests.

Compared with their W/NH counterparts, BIPOC/H patients reported more difficulties accessing IBD specialists (26% vs 11%; P = .03), poor symptom control (35% vs 18%; P = .02), lower mean HRQOL (41 ± 14 vs 49 ± 13; P < .001), more negative impact on employment (50% vs 33%; P = .029), worse financial stability (53% vs 32%; P = .006), and more problems finding social/emotional support for IBD (64% vs 37%; P < .001). BIPOC/H patients utilized emergency department services more often (42% vs 22%; P = .004), reported higher concern scores related to IBD medication (17.1 vs 14.9; P = .001), and worried more about medication harm (19.5% vs 17.7%; P = .002). The survey response rate was 14%.

BIPOC/H patients with IBD had worse clinical disease, lower HRQOL scores, had more medication concerns, had less access to specialists, had less social and emotional support, and used emergency department services more often than W/NH patients.

As new therapies for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) are approved, there is an increasing need for evidence that clarifies their positioning and sequencing.

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to inform physicians' decisions when they choose which intervention (drug or treatment strategy) to administer to their patients. Pragmatic head-to-head trials represent the best tools for CER, but only a few have been published in the IBD field. Network meta-analyses can point toward the superiority of one drug over another, but they do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Finally, real-world evidence complements that coming from head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, assessing the real-life effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

There is insufficient evidence to create a definitive therapeutic algorithm for CD, but some general considerations can be made. Anti-TNF-α agents seemingly represent the most 'sustainable' first-line choice, considering benefit-harm ratio and costs; vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered as first-line choice when safety issues become prominent. In the event of pharmacodynamic failure, out-of-class swap is to be preferred - possibly with anti-IL23p19 as the best option, with unclear data regarding upadacitinib positioning; a second anti-TNF-α could be considered, as a second choice, after pharmacokinetic failure.

Chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tissues underlies gastrointestinal inflammatory disorders, leading to tissue damage and a constellation of painful and debilitating symptoms. These disorders include inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), and eosinophilic disorders (eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic duodenitis). Gastrointestinal inflammatory disorders can often present with overlapping symptoms necessitating the use of invasive procedures to give an accurate diagnosis.

This study used peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and eosinophilic duodenitis to better understand the alterations to the transcriptome of individuals with these diseases and identify potential markers of active inflammation within the peripheral blood of patients that may be useful in diagnosis. Single-cell RNA-sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from the blood samples of pediatric patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal disorders, including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic duodenitis, and controls with histologically healthy gastrointestinal tracts.

We identified 730 (FDR < 0.05) differentially expressed genes between individuals with gastrointestinal disorders and controls across eight immune cell types.

There were common patterns among GI disorders, such as the widespread upregulation of MTRNR2L8 across cell types, and many differentially expressed genes showed distinct patterns of dysregulation among the different gastrointestinal diseases compared to controls, including upregulation of XIST across cell types among individuals with ulcerative colitis and upregulation of Th2-associated genes in eosinophilic disorders. These findings indicate both overlapping and distinct alterations to the transcriptome of individuals with gastrointestinal disorders compared to controls, which provide insight as to which genes may be useful as markers for disease in the peripheral blood of patients.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remain challenging in terms of understanding their causes and in terms of diagnosing, treating, and monitoring patients. Modern diagnosis combines biomarkers, imaging, and endoscopic methods. Common biomarkers like CRP and fecal calprotectin, while invaluable tools, have limitations and are not entirely specific to IBD. The limitations of existing markers and the invasiveness of endoscopic procedures highlight the need to discover and implement new markers. With an ideal biomarker, we could predict the risk of disease development, as well as the possibility of response to a particular therapy, which would be significant in elucidating the pathogenesis of the disease. Recent research in the fields of machine learning, proteomics, epigenetics, and gut microbiota provides further insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and is also revealing new biomarkers. New markers, such as BAFF, PGE-MUM, oncostatin M, microRNA panels, αvβ6 antibody, and S100A12 from stool, are increasingly being identified, with αvβ6 antibody and oncostatin M being potentially close to being presented into clinical practice. However, the specificity of certain markers still remains problematic. Furthermore, the use of expensive and less accessible technology for detecting new markers, such as microRNAs, represents a limitation for widespread use in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the need for non-invasive, comprehensive markers is becoming increasingly important regarding the complexity of treatment and overall management of IBD.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can lead to long-term complications that significantly impact patients' quality of life and healthcare resource utilization. Prior studies have demonstrated improved short-term outcomes to early exposure of biologics in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) but not in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there are conflicting data on impact of early intervention on longer-term adverse events. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the impact of early biologic treatment on rates of IBD-related surgery.

A systematic search was conducted in April 2022. Studies were included if biologic initiation was compared between patients starting early (<3 years of diagnosis or top-down treatment) vs later (>3 years of diagnosis or step-up treatment). Studies with <1 year of follow-up were excluded. The outcomes were colectomy and CD-related surgery for patients with UC and CD, respectively. Random-effects analyses were conducted to compare rates of IBD surgery between early and late biologic treatment.

Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies included patients with UC and 15 studies included patients with CD. In patients with CD, early biologic therapy was associated with lower odds of surgery (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.84) compared with late treatment. Conversely, in patients with UC, the odds of colectomy were increased (odds ratio, 2.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-6.30).

Early biologic treatment is associated with lower rates of surgery in patients with CD. In contrast, early biologic therapy appears to be associated with higher rates of colectomy in patients with UC, which may be confounded by disease severity.

Annual out-of-pocket expenditures for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are estimated to be as high as $41,000, with medications, such as biologics, being one of the main cost contributors. Although biologics have revolutionized IBD management, these medications are costly owing to their molecular makeup and manufacturing processes. Biosimilars, which are biologic medications that are highly similar to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved reference product with no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, or potency, offer the same therapeutic benefits at a reduced cost. Other additional benefits offered with biosimilars include increased treatment access and fostered development of new therapeutic options. Despite the expansion of biosimilars in IBD, their adoption and utilization have been suboptimal in the United States. This article provides an overview of the biosimilar landscape in IBD, including FDA-approved biosimilars available, and a clinical guide to navigate switching to biosimilars in various clinical scenarios based on current evidence.

Early biological treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is important in disease control. Previous studies have suggested that patients with IBD from Non-Academic Hospitals were less likely to receive biologics. The aims of this study were (1) to use the granular data in the clinical database, GASTROBIO, to study detailed differences in time from IBD diagnosis to first administration of biologics, hospital admission, and surgery in patients referred to Academic Hospitals versus to Non-Academic Hospitals, and (2) to explore differences in disease extent, behavior, and indication for biological treatment.

This was a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive population-based quality study of patients with IBD initiating biologics in the North Denmark Region between 2016 and 2018. Data from GASTROBIO were extracted, namely demographic data, time of diagnosis, biological treatments with indications, hospital admission, and surgery.

Of the 146 patients included, 84 were from the Academic and 62 from the Non-Academic Hospitals. No significant differences in median time from diagnosis to (1) treatment, (2) hospital admission or (3) IBD surgery between the groups were observed. A higher percentage of patients with luminal Crohn's disease were treated with biologics at the Academic Hospital (78% and 66%).

Based on the findings of this population-based study, we found no evidence that the referral area had a significant impact on the duration from diagnosis to the initiation of biological treatment, hospital admissions, or surgery. However, the data suggested that fewer patients with luminal Crohn's disease were referred to biologics from Non-Academic Hospitals.

Timely diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may improve clinical outcomes.

Examine associations between time to diagnosis, patterns of prior healthcare use, and clinical outcomes in IBD.

Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink we identified incident cases of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), diagnosed between January 2003 and May 2016, with a first primary care gastrointestinal consultation during the 3-year period prior to IBD diagnosis. We used multivariable Cox regression to examine the association of primary care consultation frequency (n=1, 2, >2), annual consultation intensity, hospitalisations for gastrointestinal symptoms, and time to diagnosis with a range of key clinical outcomes following diagnosis.

We identified 2645 incident IBD cases (CD: 782; UC: 1863). For CD, >2 consultations were associated with intestinal surgery (adjusted HR (aHR)=2.22, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.39) and subsequent CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.80, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.50). For UC, >2 consultations were associated with corticosteroid dependency (aHR=1.76, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.41), immunomodulator use (aHR=1.68, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.26), UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.43, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.95) and colectomy (aHR=2.01, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.27). For CD, hospitalisation prior to diagnosis was associated with CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.30, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.68) and intestinal surgery (aHR=1.71, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.58); for UC, it was associated with immunomodulator use (aHR=1.42, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.81), UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.95) and colectomy (aHR=1.54, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.34). For CD, consultation intensity in the year before diagnosis was associated with CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.19, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.28) and intestinal surgery (aHR=1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.23); for UC, it was associated with corticosteroid use (aHR=1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13), corticosteroid dependency (aHR=1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11), and UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.21). For CD, time to diagnosis was associated with risk of CD-related hospitalisation (aHR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.68); for UC, it was associated with reduced risk of UC-related hospitalisation (aHR=0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98) and colectomy (aHR=0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80).

Electronic records contain valuable information about patterns of healthcare use that can be used to expedite timely diagnosis and identify aggressive forms of IBD.

It is unclear whether widespread use of biologics is reducing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surgical resection rates. We designed a population-based study evaluating the impact of early antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) on surgical resection rates up to 5 years from diagnosis.

We evaluated all patients with IBD diagnosed in Cardiff, Wales 2005-2016. The primary measure was the impact of early (within 1 year of diagnosis) sustained (at least 3 months) anti-TNF compared with no therapy on surgical resection rates. Baseline factors were used to balance groups by propensity scores, with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology and removing immortal time bias. Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) with IBD unclassified (IBD-U) (excluding those with proctitis) were analysed.

1250 patients were studied. For CD, early sustained anti-TNF therapy was associated with a reduced likelihood of resection compared with no treatment (IPTW HR 0.29 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.65), p=0.003). In UC including IBD-U (excluding proctitis), there was an increase in the risk of colectomy for the early sustained anti-TNF group compared with no treatment (IPTW HR 4.6 (95% CI 1.9 to 10), p=0.001).

Early sustained use of anti-TNF therapy is associated with reduced surgical resection rates in CD, but not in UC where there was a paradoxical increased surgery rate. This was because baseline clinical factors were less predictive of colectomy than anti-TNF usage. These data support the use of early introduction of anti-TNF therapy in CD whereas benefit in UC cannot be assessed by this methodology.

Few studies have shown the effects of prompt outpatient follow-up in relation to reducing readmission rates in patients hospitalized with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our study evaluated whether postdischarge follow-up was associated with fewer IBD-related readmissions.

This single-center retrospective study included 477 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who were readmitted to our tertiary care hospital from January 1, 2016, to June 1, 2022. Rehospitalization admissions were defined as admissions that occurred within 90 days after discharge date. We used a chi-square or Fisher's exact test to test for bivariate comparisons to determine if there was an association in patients readmitted for IBD and primary care or gastroenterology follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks versus no follow-up.

In UC patients, there were 118 admissions from 2016 to 2022; 36/118 (31%) and 41/118 (34.7%) of the patients were readmitted at 30 days and 90 days, respectively. In the CD group, there were 101 (36.73%) readmissions among 277 patients, with 174 nonreadmissions (63.27%).

Gastroenterology follow-up within 1 month was associated with reduced rates of admission in both groups (P < 0.05). This study highlights the importance of close gastroenterology follow-up for IBD-related hospitalizations.

The multifactorial nature of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which manifests differently in individuals creates a need for a better understanding of the behaviour and pattern of the disease due to environmental factors. The current study aimed to study the changes in IBD behaviour, presentation, and characteristics in patients over the past two decades with a goal of improving patients' diagnosis, management and outcomes.

During a 6-month period (1/02/2022-30/07/2022), the information of patients with IBD who attended IBD outpatient clinics of 11 referral centre's in six countries was collected, and based on the first time of diagnosis with IBD, they were allocated as group A (those who were diagnosed more than 15 years ago), group B (those who were diagnosed with IBD between 5 and 15 years ago) and group C (IBD cases who diagnosed in recent 5 years). Then the most prevalent subtypes and characters of the disease are evaluated and compared to make clear if the presenting pattern and behaviour of the disease has changed in the last 2 decades.

Overall 1430 patients with IBD including 1207 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (84.5%) and 205 patients with Crohn's disease (CD; 14.3%) included. Mean age of participants at the first time of diagnosis with IBD was 30 years. The extra-intestinal involvement of IBD in groups A and B was more prevalent in comparison with group C. Most of those in groups A & B had academic education but in group C, the most prevalent educational status was high school or diploma (P = 0.012). In contrast to groups A and B, the relative prevalence of medium socioeconomic level in group C had decreased (65%). Relative prevalence of UC subtypes was similar among groups A and B (extensive colitis as most prevalent) but in group C, the most prevalent subtype is left side colitis (38.17%). The most prevalent subtype of CD in groups A and B was ileocolic involvement while in group C, upper GI involvement is significantly increased. The rate of food sensitivity among groups A and B was more than group C (P = 0.00001). The relative prevalence of patients with no flare has increased with a steady slope (P < 0.00001). Relative prevalence of presenting symptoms among patients with UC in group C differs and nowadays the rate abdominal pain (70.7%) and bloating (43.9%) have increased and frequency of diarrhoea (67.4%) has decreased.

In the recent 5 years, the pattern of UC presentation has changed. The rate of upper GI involvement in CD and relative prevalence of patients with no disease flare increased and the rate of extra intestinal involvement decreased.

None.