Pre-operative templating has become an important routine for many surgeons in planning for total hip arthroplasty surgery. Accurate THA templating reduces surgical time, increases precision, reduces the need for revision and reduces the overall complication rate. Incorrect placement of the scaling ball will lead to a magnification error with a subsequent templating error.

Digital radiographs of 211 patients undergoing primary THA by a single surgeon were reviewed. Two separate sets of consecutive digitally templated radiographs where reviewed and compared with regards to: accuracy of scaling ball placement and accuracy of templating. The interval was chosen to allow bedding in of, and familiarity with the templating system between orthopaedics, nursing and radiographers, and to ascertain if consistency improved with time in our institution. The positioning of the scaling ball was as assessed and classified as either ideal or non-ideal.

The data collected showed significant improvement (p < 0.0001) in the accuracy of SB positioning over time (70 % 2nd series vs 30.7. Ideal placement produced more accurate digital templating. With acetabular templating a 44.2 % (n = 34/77) versus 27.3 % (n = 9/33) accuracy with exact measurement (p = 0.008) and 83.1 % (n = 64/77) versus 63.6 % (n = 21/33) within ±2 sizes (p = 0.046). The study also demonstrated significant improvement in accuracy of SB positioning when the fat apron is absent (p = 0.042).

In addition to overall efficiencies in planning and preparation, accurate scaling ball positioning, with regards to coronal plane placement, improves the accuracy of both the acetabular and femoral components in digital templating. Ongoing education for all teams (orthopaedic, nursing and radiographers) is essential to optimise hospital templating.

We describe a method for planning total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture based on a simple CT scan protocol of the contralateral hip. This protocol was used on 22 consecutive patients during the inclusion period, followed by reconstruction and 2D templating to predict the implant size and positioning. The exact planned size was achieved in 21/22 (95%) cups, 14/22 (64%) femoral stems and 14/22 (64%) femoral heads. There were no intra- or postoperative fractures. After surgery in which this planning method had been applied, the differences in length and lateral offset were less than 5 mm on average relative to the opposite side (mean postoperative leg length difference of -2 mm (-8 to +3 mm) and lateralization of -4 mm (-14 to +3 mm)). While this technique exposes the patient to additional radiation, it does not require any specific devices or surgical approach and could be used in most hospitals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Calibrated pelvic X-ray images are needed in the preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to predict component sizes. Errors and mismatch in the size of one or more components are reported, which can lead to clinically relevant complications. Our aim is to investigate whether we can solve the fundamental problem of X-ray calibration and whether traditional X-ray still has a place in preoperative planning despite improved radiological alternatives.

Based on geometric and radiographic principles, we estimate that the magnification factor is adapted to the X-ray device and depends strongly on the source-image distance of the device. We analyse the errors of the various calibration methods and investigate which narrow range can be expected to show that the center of rotation is sufficiently accurate. Based on the results of several CT-scans we defined an adapted magnification factor and validated the degree of measurement accuracy.

The true magnification of objects on X-ray images depends mainly on the device settings. Stem size prediction is possible to a limited extent, with an error margin of 4.3%. Components can be predicted with a safety margin of one size up and down as with CT or 3D images. The prerequisite is that the source-image distance is greater than or equal to 120 cm, the table-image distance is known, and the object-image distance is estimated according to the patient's BMI. We defined a device-adapted magnification factor that simplifies the templating routine and can be used to obtain the most reliable preoperative dimensional measurements that can be expected from X-ray images. We found the error margin of the magnification factor with the highest degrees of prediction and precision.

Preoperative planning is reliable and reproducible using X-ray images if calibration is performed with the device-adapted magnification factor suggested in this paper.

Selecting the optimal size of components is crucial when performing a primary total hip arthroplasty. Implanting the accurate size of the acetabular component can occasionally be exacting, chiefly for surgeons with little experience, whilst the complications of imprecise acetabular sizing or over-reaming can be potentially devastating.

To assist clinicians intraoperatively with a simple and repeatable tip in elucidating the ambivalence when determining the proper acetabular component size is not straightforwardly achieved, specifically when surgeons are inexperienced or preoperative templating is unavailable.

This method was employed in 263 operations in our department from June 2021 to December 2022. All operations were performed by the same team of joint reconstruction surgeons, employing a typical posterior hip approach technique. The types of acetabular shells implanted were: The Dynasty® acetabular cup system (MicroPort Orthopedics, Shanghai, China) and the R3® acetabular system (Smith & Nephew, Watford, United Kingdom), which both feature cementless press-fit design.

The mean value of all cases was calculated and collated with each other. We distinguished as oversized an implanted acetabular shell when its size was > 2 mm larger than the size of the acetabular size indicator reamer (ASIR) or when the implanted shell was larger than 4 mm compared to the preoperative planned cup. The median size of the implanted acetabular shell was 52 (48-54) mm, while the median size of the preoperatively planned cup was 50 (48-56) mm, and the median size of the ASIR was 52 (50-54) mm. The correlation coefficient between ASIR size and implanted acetabular component size exhibited a high positive correlation with r = 0.719 (P < 0.001). Contrariwise, intraoperative ASIR measurements precisely predicted the implanted cups' size or differed by only one size (2 mm) in 245 cases.

In our study, we demonstrated that the size of the first acetabular reamer not entering freely in the acetabular rim corroborates the final acetabular component size to implant. This was also corresponding in the majority of the cases with conventional preoperative templating. It can be featured as a valid tool for avoiding the potentially pernicious complications of acetabular cup over-reaming and over-sizing in primary total hip arthroplasty. It is a simple and reproducible technical note useful for confirming the predicted acetabular cup size preoperatively; thus, its application could be considered routinely, even in cases where preoperative templating is unavailable.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a frequently performed procedure; the objective is restoration of native hip biomechanics and achieving functional range of motion (ROM) through precise positioning of the prosthetic components. Advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging and computed tomography (CT)-based navigation are valuable tools in both the preoperative planning and intraoperative execution. The aim of this study is to provide a thorough overview on the applications of CT scans in both the preoperative and intraoperative settings of primary THA. Preoperative planning using CT-based 3D imaging enables greater accuracy in prediction of implant sizes, leading to enhancement of surgical workflow with optimization of implant inventory. Surgeons can perform a more thorough assessment of posterior and anterior acetabular wall coverage, acetabular osteophytes, anatomical landmarks, and thus achieve more functional implant positioning. Intraoperative CT-based navigation can facilitate precise execution of the preoperative plan, to attain optimal positioning of the prosthetic components to avoid impingement. Medial reaming can be minimized preserving native bone stock, which can enable restoration of femoral, acetabular, and combined offsets. In addition, it is associated with greater accuracy in leg length adjustment, a critical factor in patients' postoperative satisfaction. Despite the higher costs and radiation exposure, which currently limits its widespread adoption, it offers many benefits, and the increasing interest in robotic surgery has facilitated its integration into routine practice. Conducting additional research on ultra-low-dose CT scans and examining the potential for translation of 3D imaging into improved clinical outcomes will be necessary to warrant its expanded application.

The modified anterolateral approach (Röttinger) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) offers great advantages over conventional approaches, especially concerning early postoperative symptoms, which are mild and well tolerated by patients. Robotic-assisted implantation might facilitate rapid adoption of the modified anterolateral approach without exposing surgeons to risks encountered during the learning curve. This study posits that the use of robotic assistance in conjunction with the modified anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) can provide a substantial enhancement in the accuracy of cup placement in comparison to manual surgery.

Thirty-two robotic-assisted THAs met the inclusion criteria and were matched to 32 conventional cases. Acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, limb-length discrepancy, and acetabular offset were assessed using certified planning software by two independent observers using pre- and postoperative anterior-posterior radiographs. Data was analyzed for normal distribution. Chi2 test was used to determine whether implanted acetabular cups that were within Lewinnek's safe zones were influenced by type of implantation. Effect size estimates and statistical power analysis were also performed to appreciate the appropriateness of the chosen sample size.

Robotic-assisted implantation was found to significantly improve acetabular cup placement in terms of inclination (p < 0.001) but not anteversion (p = 0.783). Although mean postoperative limb-length discrepancy and mean acetabular offset did not differ between groups, a significantly smaller variance was found in the robotic-assisted group (p < 0.001) and (p = 0.04), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of consistently implanting the acetabular cup within the Lewinnek safe zones p = 0.641 for anteversion and p = 0.230 for inclination, respectively.

Our results show that although robotic-assisted acetabular cup implantation performed through the modified anterolateral approach did not significantly differ from conventional implantation, it did offer increased accuracy in cup positioning, acetabular bone preservation, and limb-length restoration.

Listening to the change in the hammering sound is 1 of the elements used to assess the cementless stem stability. This study aimed to quantitatively investigate the change in the acoustic characteristics between the early and late phases of cementless stem insertion in total hip arthroplasty and to identify which patient characteristics contribute to the change in the hammering sound.

The acoustic parameters of the hammering sounds in the early and late phases of cementless taper-wedged stem insertion for 51 hips in 45 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (mean age = 68 years, height = 1.56 m, weight = 55.0 kg) were analyzed. Parameters including patient's basic characteristics, radiographical femoral morphology, and canal fill ratio were assessed as potential contributors to the change in the hammering sound.

The low-frequency bands (0.5-1.0 kHz and 1.0-1.5 kHz) showed the largest changes during stem insertion and were therefore considered key bands for the analysis of sound alterations. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that height (β = 8.312, P = .013) and proximal canal fill ratio (β = -3.8568, P = .038) were independently associated with the sound alterations. The decision tree analysis identified height (≥1.66 m or <1.66 m) as the best single discriminator for the sound alteration.

Patients with smaller stature showed the least change in the hammering sound during stem insertion. Understanding the acoustic characteristics of hammering sound alteration during cementless stem insertion may aid in the achievement of optimal stem insertion.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between acetabular width, three-dimensional (3D) simulation, and surgical results in total hip arthroplasty patients who have developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

This retrospective study included 216 DDH cases. Inner and outer acetabular width (OAW) was measured at the plane passing through the center of acetabular fossa. 3D simulation and 2D standard templating were performed. The actual cup size and the use of augments during surgery were recorded. Association among the indices and their distribution in different types of DDH were analyzed.

A difference of 13 to 14 millimeters (mm) was found between the inner acetabular width and actual cup size used in type II, III, and IV cases, while the difference was 0.2 to 3.6 mm for OAW. The accuracy of 2D templating and 3D simulation in predicting cup size was comparable in Crowe type I (86.5 versus 76%, P = .075), type II (72.7 versus 51.5%, P = .127), and type III (93.3 versus 66.7%, P = .169). The 3D simulation was significantly more accurate in Crowe type IV (89.1% versus 60.9%, P = .001). Augments and bone grafts were significantly more commonly used in type II (25%) than in the other types (0 to 6.5%).

OAW more accurately predicted actual cup size than inner acetabular width. The supero-lateral acetabular bone defects in type II cases require additional attention. Compared with 2D templating, 3D simulation is more accurate in predicting actual cup size in dysplastic hips with severe deformity and may be recommended in these selected cases, especially for Crowe IV patients.

We present 2 robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty cases with significant segmental acetabular defects that could compromise cup fixation. We outline an algorithmic planning approach on a computed tomography (CT)-based platform to address these defects by predicting augmentation needs, when component adjustments alone are inadequate, and describe the novel combination of augments in conjunction with robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty.

CT-based robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty is a powerful tool to assess and address acetabular deficiencies. Rudimentary augment planning extracts additional value out of the preoperative CT. However, there remains room for intelligent assessment of hip centers and for deliberate augment planning and execution.

This study aims to compare the accuracy of CT-based preoperative planning with that of acetate templating in predicting implant size, neck length, and neck cut length, and to evaluate the reproducibility of the two methods.

This prospective study was conducted between August 2020 and March 2021. Patients who underwent elective primary total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon were assessed for eligibility. The included patients underwent both acetate templating and CT-based planning by two observers after the operation. Each observer conducted both acetate templating and CT-based planning twice for each case. The outcome measures included the following: (1) the accuracy of surgical planning in predicting implant size, calcar length, and neck length, which was defined as the difference between the planned size and length and the actual size and length; (2) reproducibility of the two planning techniques, which were assessed by inter-observer and intra-observer reliability analysis; (3) the influence of potential confounding factors on planning accuracy, which was evaluated using generalized estimating equations.

A total of 57 cases were included in the study. CT-based planning was more accurate than acetate templating for predicting cup size (93% vs 79%, p < 0.001) and stem size (93% vs 75%, p < 0.001). When assessed by mean absolute difference, the comparison between acetate templating and CT-based planning was 4.28 mm vs 3.74 mm (p = 0.122) in predicting neck length and 3.05 mm vs 2.93 mm (p = 0.731) in predicting neck cut length. In the inter-observer reliability analysis, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.790 was achieved for predicting cup size, and an ICC of 0.966 was achieved for predicting stem size using CT-based planning. In terms of intra-observer reliability, Observer 1 achieved an ICC of 0.803 for predicting cup size and 0.965 for predicting stem size in CT-based planning. Observer 2 achieved ICC values of 0.727 and 0.959 for predicting cup and stem sizes, respectively. The average planning time was 6.48 ± 1.55 min for CT-based planning and 6.12 ± 1.40 min for acetate templating (p = 0.015).

The CT-based planning system is more accurate than acetate templating for predicting implant size and has good reproducibility in total hip arthroplasty.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the learning curves of 2 trainees with different experience levels to reach proficiency in preoperative planning of the cup size based on learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) statistics and a cumulative summation (CUSUM) test.

One-hundred-twenty patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless cup were selected. Preoperative planning was performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. Trainee 1 (student) and trainee 2 (resident) planned the cup size. The trainees were blinded to the preoperative plan and the definitive cup size. Only after a cup size was chosen, the trainees were unblinded to the preoperative plan of the surgeon. LC-CUSUM was applied to both trainees to determine when proficiency in determining the appropriate cup size was reached. A CUSUM test was applied to ensure retention of proficiency.

With reference to the preoperative plan of the surgeon, LC-CUSUM indicated proficiency after 94 planning attempts for trainee 1 and proficiency after 66 attempts for trainee 2, respectively. Trainee 1 and 2 maintained proficiency thereafter. With reference to the definitive cup size, LC-CUSUM did not signal competency within the first 120 planning attempts for trainee 1. Trainee 2 was declared competent after 103 attempts and retained competency thereafter.

LC-CUSUM/CUSUM allow for an individualized, quantitative and continuous assessment of planning quality. Based on LC-CUSUM statistics, the two trainees of this study gain proficiency in planning of the acetabular cup size after 50-100 attempts when an immediate feedback is provided. Previous experience positively influences the performance. The study serves as basis for the medical education of students and residents in joint replacement procedures.