1
|
Papaioannou M, Vagiana E, Kotoulas SC, Sileli M, Manika K, Tsantos A, Kapravelos N. Tracheostomy-related data from an intensive care unit for two consecutive years before the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Methodol 2024; 14:91868. [PMID: 38983661 PMCID: PMC11229867 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.91868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tracheostomy is commonly used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients who are expected to be on long-term mechanical ventilation or suffer from emergency upper airway obstruction. However, some studies have conflicting findings regarding the optimal technique and its timing and benefits. AIM To provide evidence of practice, characteristics, and outcome concerning tracheostomy in an ICU of a tertiary care hospital. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study including adult critical care patients in a single ICU for two consecutive years. Patients' demographic characteristics, severity of illness (APACHE II score), level of consciousness [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)], comorbidities, timing and type of tracheostomy procedure performed and outcome were recorded. We defined late as tracheostomy placement after 8 days or no tracheotomy. RESULTS Data of 660 patients were analyzed (median age of 60 years), median APACHE II score of 19 and median GCS score of 12 at admission. Tracheostomy was performed in 115 patients, of whom 63 had early and 52 late procedures. Early tracheostomy was mainly executed in case of altered level of consciousness and severe critical illness polyneuromyopathy, however there were no significant statistical results (47.6% vs 36.5%, P = 0.23) and (23.8% vs 19.2%, P = 0.55) respectively. Regarding the method selected, early surgical tracheostomy (ST) was conducted in patients with maxillofacial injuries (50.0% vs 0.0%, P = 0.033), whereas late surgical tracheostomy was selected for patients with goiter (44.4% vs 0.0% P = 0.033). Patients with early tracheostomy spent significantly fewer days on mechanical ventilation (15.3 ± 8.5 vs 22.8 ± 9.6, P < 0.001) and in ICU in general (18.8 ± 9.1 vs 25.4 ± 11.5, P < 0.001). Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT) vs ST was preferable in older critical care patients in the case of Central Nervous System underlying cause of admission (62.5% vs 26.3%, P = 0.004). ST was the method of choice in compromised airway (31.6%, vs 7.3% P = 0.008). A large proportion of patients (88/115) with tracheostomy managed to wean from mechanical ventilation and were transferred out of the ICU (100% vs 17.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION PDT was performed more frequently in our cohort. This technique did not affect mechanical ventilation days, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ICU length of stay, or survival. No complications were observed in the percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy groups. Patients undergoing early tracheostomy benefited in terms of mechanical ventilation days and ICU length of stay but not of discharge status, presence of VAP, or survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Papaioannou
- 1st Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| | - Evdoxia Vagiana
- 2nd Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| | | | - Maria Sileli
- 2nd Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| | - Katerina Manika
- Department of Pulmonary, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| | - Alexandros Tsantos
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “Ippokration”, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kapravelos
- 2nd Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jadhav R, Jadhav R. A cross-sectional study to evaluate the impact of early tracheostomy in management of neurosurgical patients. Ir J Med Sci 2024; 193:1505-1508. [PMID: 38372946 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03636-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tracheostomy is a crucial procedure in the management of neurosurgical patients, and determining the appropriate timing for the intervention remains a contentious issue. While some experts advocate for early tracheostomy, others recommend a more conservative approach of closely monitoring the patient's condition before performing the procedure. METHODS To shed light on this debate, a retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 78 cases who underwent tracheostomy in the neurosurgical ICU of Yashosai Hospital, Nanded, Maharashtra, between January and December 2022. The study relied on hospital records, and descriptive statistics were used to represent the quantitative data. RESULTS The study's findings showed that the majority of the study subjects were male, with an average age of 46.3 + / - 15.2 years. The results suggested that early tracheostomy was associated with improved outcomes in terms of shorter durations of tracheostomy, hospital stays, ICU stays, and mechanical ventilation. However, the incidence of complications did not differ significantly between the early and late tracheostomy groups. CONCLUSION Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the optimal management of neurosurgical patients, with implications for clinical practice and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchita Jadhav
- Yashosai Hospital (Neurosurgical and Trauma Care Unit), Nanded-Waghala, India.
| | - Rupal Jadhav
- Yashosai Hospital (Neurosurgical and Trauma Care Unit), Nanded-Waghala, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta N, Saraf A, Bashir A, Shivgotra D, Kalsotra P. Comparison of Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Critically ill Patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 75:3679-3685. [PMID: 37974701 PMCID: PMC10645750 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04025-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Comparative evaluation of early and late tracheostomy outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients. The present retrospective study was conducted in Government medical college Jammu from April 2021 to November 2022 on 111 tracheotomised patient in intensive care unit. All tracheostomies with in 10 days of intubation were grouped as early tracheostomy (ET) group and all those done after 10 days were grouped as LATE TRACHEOSTOMY (LT) group. APACHE II score at the time of intensive care unit admission of all included tracheotomised patients was noted. Data regarding mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) was studied. Mean age of presentation was 41.5 ± 15.7 yrs, with male preponderance. Out of 111 patients, 57 patients underwent early tracheostomy and 54 underwent late TRACHEOSTOMY. In APACHE II, < 25 category-short term mortality was 4 in ET and 5 in LT; long term mortality in ET was 4 and 10 in LT; average days of mechanical ventilation were 11.2 in ET and 3 in LT; average stay in ICU was 18 days in ET and 61 days in LT. in APACHE II > 25-short term mortality was 4 in ET and 5 in LT; long term mortality in ET was 3 and 9 in LT. Average days of mechanical ventilation were 10.8 in ET and 57 in LT; average stay in ICU was 24 days in ET and 79 days in LT. Early tracheostomy is superior to late Tracheostomy in terms of mortality, number of days of mechanical ventilation and the duration of intensive care unit stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitika Gupta
- Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, SMGS Hospital, Government Medical College Jammu, Jammu, J&K, India
| | - Aditiya Saraf
- Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, SMGS Hospital, Government Medical College Jammu, Jammu, J&K, India
| | - Aadil Bashir
- Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, SMGS Hospital, Government Medical College Jammu, Jammu, J&K, India
| | - Dikshit Shivgotra
- Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, SMGS Hospital, Government Medical College Jammu, Jammu, J&K, India
| | - Parmod Kalsotra
- Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, SMGS Hospital, Government Medical College Jammu, Jammu, J&K, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shreckengost CSH, Wan L, Reitz AW, Lin A, Dhamsania RK, Spychalski J, Douglas JM, Lane A, Amin D, Roser S, Berkowitz D, Foianini JE, Moore R, Sreedharan JK, Niroula A, Smith R, Khullar OV. Tracheostomies of Patients With COVID-19: A Survey of Infection Reported by Health Care Professionals. Am J Crit Care 2023; 32:9-20. [PMID: 36065019 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2022337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care professionals (HCPs) performing tracheostomies in patients with COVID-19 may be at increased risk of infection. OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors underlying HCPs' COVID-19 infection and determine whether tracheostomy providers report increased rates of infection. METHODS An anonymous international survey examining factors associated with COVID-19 infection was made available November 2020 through July 2021 to HCPs at a convenience sample of hospitals, universities, and professional organizations. Infections reported were compared between HCPs involved in tracheostomy on patients with COVID-19 and HCPs who were not involved. RESULTS Of the 361 respondents (from 33 countries), 50% (n = 179) had performed tracheostomies on patients with COVID-19. Performing tracheostomies on patients with COVID-19 was not associated with increased infection in either univariable (P = .06) or multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.90-2.46; P = .13). Working in a low- or middle-income country (LMIC) was associated with increased infection in both univariable (P < .001) and multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 2.88; CI, 1.50-5.53; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Performing tracheostomy was not associated with COVID-19 infection, suggesting that tracheostomies can be safely performed in infected patients with appropriate precautions. However, HCPs in LMICs may face increased infection risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Limeng Wan
- Limeng Wan is a student, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Alexandra W Reitz
- Alexandra W. Reitz is a resident physician, Department of Surgery, Emory University
| | - Alice Lin
- Alice Lin is a student, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Rohan K Dhamsania
- Rohan K. Dhamsania is a student, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Suwanee, Georgia
| | - Julia Spychalski
- Julia Spychalski is a student, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - J Miller Douglas
- J. Miller Douglas is a student, Department of Surgery and Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Andrea Lane
- Andrea Lane is a student, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Dina Amin
- Dina Amin is an assistant professor, Department of Surgery, Emory University and a surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Steven Roser
- Steven Roser is a professor, Department of Surgery, Emory University and a surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David Berkowitz
- David Berkowitz is a physician and professor, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University
| | | | - Renée Moore
- Renée Moore is a professor, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Jithin K Sreedharan
- Jithin K. Sreedharan is general secretary, Indian Association of Respiratory Care, Kochi, India
| | - Abesh Niroula
- Abesh Niroula is a physician, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University
| | - Randi Smith
- Randi Smith is a surgeon, Department of Surgery, Emory University, a professor, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, and a surgeon, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Grady Memorial Hospital
| | - Onkar V Khullar
- Onkar V. Khullar is a surgeon, Department of Surgery, Emory University
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harrell Shreckengost CS, Foianini JE, Moron Encinas KM, Tola Guarachi H, Abril K, Amin D, Berkowitz D, Castater CA, Douglas JM, Grant AA, Khullar OV, Lane AN, Lin A, Niroula A, Nizam A, Rashied A, Reitz AW, Roser SM, Spychalski J, Arap SS, Bento RF, Ciaralo PPD, Imamura R, Kowalski LP, Mahmoud A, Mariani AW, Menegozzo CAM, Minamoto H, Montenegro FLM, Pêgo-Fernandes PM, Santos J, Utiyama EM, Sreedharan JK, Kalchiem-Dekel O, Nguyen J, Dhamsania RK, Allen K, Modzik A, Pathak V, White C, Blas J, Talal El-Abur I, Tirado G, Yánez Benítez C, Weiser TG, Barry M, Boeck M, Farrell M, Greenberg A, Miller P, Park P, Camazine M, Dillon D, Smith RN. Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Patients With COVID-19: A Multinational Cohort Study. Crit Care Explor 2022; 4:e0796. [PMID: 36440062 PMCID: PMC9681622 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Timing of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 has attracted substantial attention. Initial guidelines recommended delaying or avoiding tracheostomy due to the potential for particle aerosolization and theoretical risk to providers. However, early tracheostomy could improve patient outcomes and alleviate resource shortages. This study compares outcomes in a diverse population of hospitalized COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy either "early" (within 14 d of intubation) or "late" (more than 14 d after intubation). DESIGN International multi-institute retrospective cohort study. SETTING Thirteen hospitals in Bolivia, Brazil, Spain, and the United States. PATIENTS Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 undergoing early or late tracheostomy between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 549 patients from 13 hospitals in four countries were included in the final analysis. Multivariable regression analysis showed that early tracheostomy was associated with a 12-day decrease in time on mechanical ventilation (95% CI, -16 to -8; p < 0.001). Further, ICU and hospital lengths of stay in patients undergoing early tracheostomy were 15 days (95% CI, -23 to -9 d; p < 0.001) and 22 days (95% CI, -31 to -12 d) shorter, respectively. In contrast, early tracheostomy patients experienced lower risk-adjusted survival at 30-day post-admission (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.8-5.2). Differences in 90-day post-admission survival were not identified. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 patients undergoing tracheostomy within 14 days of intubation have reduced ventilator dependence as well as reduced lengths of stay. However, early tracheostomy patients experienced lower 30-day survival. Future efforts should identify patients most likely to benefit from early tracheostomy while accounting for location-specific capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Katrina Abril
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Dina Amin
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - David Berkowitz
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - J Miller Douglas
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - April A Grant
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Onkar Vohra Khullar
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Andrea Nichole Lane
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Alice Lin
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Abesh Niroula
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Azhar Nizam
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ammar Rashied
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Alexandra W Reitz
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Steven M Roser
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Julia Spychalski
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sérgio Samir Arap
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Rui Imamura
- Division of Otolaringology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luiz Paulo Kowalski
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ali Mahmoud
- Division of Otolaringology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Hélio Minamoto
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Jones Santos
- Division of General Surgery and Trauma, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jithin K Sreedharan
- Department of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Or Kalchiem-Dekel
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Rohan K Dhamsania
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine Georgia Campus, Suwanee, GA
| | - Kerianne Allen
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Riverside Health System, Newport News, VA, USA
| | - Adrian Modzik
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Riverside Health System, Newport News, VA, USA
| | - Vikas Pathak
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Riverside Health System, Newport News, VA, USA
| | - Cheryl White
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Riverside Health System, Newport News, VA, USA
| | - Juan Blas
- Department of Surgery, Royo Villanova Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Tirado
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Royo Villanova Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Thomas G Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Mark Barry
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Marissa Boeck
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Michael Farrell
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Anya Greenberg
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Phoebe Miller
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Paul Park
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Maraya Camazine
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO USA
| | - Deidre Dillon
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO USA
| | - Randi N Smith
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McShane EK, Sun BJ, Maggio PM, Spain DA, Forrester JD. Improving tracheostomy delivery for trauma and surgical critical care patients: timely trach initiative. BMJ Open Qual 2022; 11:e001589. [PMID: 35551095 PMCID: PMC9109116 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tracheostomy is recommended within 7 days of intubation for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. A quality improvement project aimed to decrease time to tracheostomy to ≤7 days after intubation for eligible patients requiring tracheostomy in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). LOCAL PROBLEM From January 2017 to June 2018, approximately 85% of tracheostomies were performed >7 days after intubation. The tracheostomy was placed a median of 10 days after intubation (range: 1-57). METHODS Quality improvement principles were applied at an American College of Surgeons-verified level I trauma centre to introduce and analyse interventions to improve tracheostomy timing. Using the electronic health record, we analysed changes in tracheostomy timing, hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator-associated pneumonia and peristomal bleeding rates for three subgroups: patients with TBI, trauma patients and all SICU patients. INTERVENTIONS In July 2018, an educational roll-out for SICU residents and staff was launched to inform them of potential benefits of early tracheostomy and potential complications, which they should discuss when counselling patient decision-makers. In July 2019, an early tracheostomy workflow targeting patients with head injury was published in an institutional Trauma Guide app. RESULTS Median time from intubation to tracheostomy decreased for all patients from 14 days (range: 4-57) to 8 days (range: 1-32, p≤0.001), and median hospital LOS decreased from 38 days to 24 days (p<0.001, r=0.35). Median time to tracheostomy decreased significantly for trauma patients after publication of the algorithm (10 days (range: 3-21 days) to 6 days (range: 1-15 days), p=0.03). Among patients with TBI, family meetings were held earlier for patients who underwent early versus late tracheostomy (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS We recommend regular educational meetings, enhanced by digitally published guidelines and strategic communication as effective ways to improve tracheostomy timing. These interventions standardised practice and may benefit other institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin K McShane
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Beatrice J Sun
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Paul M Maggio
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David A Spain
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanaka A, Uchiyama A, Kitamura T, Sakaguchi R, Komukai S, Matsuyama T, Yoshida T, Tokuhira N, Iguchi N, Fujino Y. Association between early tracheostomy and patient outcomes in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort study. J Intensive Care 2022; 10:19. [PMID: 35410403 PMCID: PMC8996211 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-022-00610-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tracheostomy is commonly performed in critically ill patients because of its clinical advantages over prolonged translaryngeal endotracheal intubation. Early tracheostomy has been demonstrated to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay. However, its association with mortality remains ambiguous. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of tracheostomy and mortality in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients who underwent tracheostomy during their intensive care unit (ICU) admission between April 2015 and March 2019. Patients who underwent tracheostomy before or after 29 days of ICU admission were excluded. Data were collected from the nationwide Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The timing of tracheostomy was stratified by quartile, and the association between patient outcomes was evaluated using regression analysis. Results Among the 85558 patients admitted to 46 ICUs during the study period, 1538 patients were included in the analysis. The quartiles for tracheostomy were as follows: quartile 1, ≤ 6 days; quartile 2, 7–10 days; quartile 3, 11–14 days; and quartile 4, > 14 days. Hospital mortality was significantly higher in quartile 2 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–2.13), quartile 3 (aOR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.28–2.59), and quartile 4 (aOR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.61–3.16) (p for trend < 0.001) than in quartile 1. A similar trend was observed in the subgroup analyses of patients with impaired consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 8) and respiratory failure (PaO2:FiO2 ≤ 300) at ICU admission (p for trend = 0.081 and 0.001, respectively). Conclusions This multi-institutional observational study demonstrated that the timing of tracheostomy was significantly and independently associated with hospital mortality in a stepwise manner. Thus, early tracheostomy may be beneficial for patient outcomes, including mortality, and warrants further investigation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-022-00610-x.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pawlik J, Tomaszek L, Mazurek H, Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska W. Risk Factors and Protective Factors against Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia-A Single-Center Mixed Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Study. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12040597. [PMID: 35455713 PMCID: PMC9025776 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding the factors associated with the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) will allow for better prevention and control of VAP. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of VAP, as well as to determine risk factors and protective factors against VAP. Design: Mixed prospective and retrospective cohort study. Methods: The cohort involved 371 critically ill patients who received standard interventions to prevent VAP. Additionally, patients in the prospective cohort were provided with continuous automatic pressure control in tapered cuffs of endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes and continuous automatic subglottic secretion suction. Logistic regression was used to assess factors affecting VAP. Results: 52 (14%) patients developed VAP, and the incidence density of VAP per 1000 ventilator days was 9.7. The median days to onset of VAP was 7 [4; 13]. Early and late onset VAP was 6.2% and 7.8%, respectively. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, tracheotomy (OR = 1.6; CI 95%: 1.1 to 2.31), multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated in the culture of lower respiratory secretions (OR = 2.73; Cl 95%: 1.83 to 4.07) and ICU length of stay >5 days (OR = 3.32; Cl 95%: 1.53 to 7.19) were positively correlated with VAP, while continuous control of cuff pressure and subglottic secretion suction used together were negatively correlated with VAP (OR = 0.61; Cl 95%: 0.43 to 0.87). Conclusions: Tracheotomy, multidrug-resistant bacteria, and ICU length of stay >5 days were independent risk factors of VAP, whereas continuous control of cuff pressure and subglottic secretion suction used together were protective factors against VAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarosław Pawlik
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, 30-705 Krakow, Poland; (J.P.); or (L.T.)
| | - Lucyna Tomaszek
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, 30-705 Krakow, Poland; (J.P.); or (L.T.)
- National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, 34-700 Rabka-Zdroj, Poland
| | - Henryk Mazurek
- Department of Pneumonology and Cystic Fibrosis, National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, 34-700 Rabka-Zdroj, Poland;
- Institute of Health, State University of Applied Sciences in Nowy Sącz, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland
| | - Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska
- Department of Anesthesiology Nursing & Intensive Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Polok K, Fronczek J, van Heerden PV, Flaatten H, Guidet B, De Lange DW, Fjølner J, Leaver S, Beil M, Sviri S, Bruno RR, Wernly B, Artigas A, Pinto BB, Schefold JC, Studzińska D, Joannidis M, Oeyen S, Marsh B, Andersen FH, Moreno R, Cecconi M, Jung C, Szczeklik W. Association between tracheostomy timing and outcomes for older critically ill COVID-19 patients: prospective observational study in European intensive care units. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:482-490. [PMID: 34955167 PMCID: PMC8627864 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tracheostomy is performed in patients expected to require prolonged mechanical ventilation, but to date optimal timing of tracheostomy has not been established. The evidence concerning tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients is particularly scarce. We aimed to describe the relationship between early tracheostomy (≤10 days since intubation) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study performed in 152 centres across 16 European countries from February to December 2020. We included patients aged ≥70 yr with confirmed COVID-19 infection admitted to an intensive care unit, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the association between early tracheostomy and clinical outcomes including 3-month mortality, intensive care length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS The final analysis included 1740 patients with a mean age of 74 yr. Tracheostomy was performed in 461 (26.5%) patients. The tracheostomy rate varied across countries, from 8.3% to 52.9%. Early tracheostomy was performed in 135 (29.3%) patients. There was no difference in 3-month mortality between early and late tracheostomy in either our primary analysis (hazard ratio [HR]=0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.33) or a secondary landmark analysis (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.06). CONCLUSIONS There is a wide variation across Europe in the timing of tracheostomy for critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, we found no evidence that early tracheostomy is associated with any effect on survival amongst older critically ill patients with COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04321265.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Polok
- Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jakub Fronczek
- Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Peter Vernon van Heerden
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hans Flaatten
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bertrand Guidet
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Equipe: Epidémiologie Hospitalière Qualité et Organisation des Soins, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Dylan W. De Lange
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jesper Fjølner
- Department of Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Susannah Leaver
- Research Lead Critical Care Directorate St George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael Beil
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sigal Sviri
- Department of Medical Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Raphael Romano Bruno
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernhard Wernly
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria,Center for Public Health and Healthcare Research, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Antonio Artigas
- Critical Care Department, Corporacion Sanitaria Universitaria Parc Tauli, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Bernardo Bollen Pinto
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joerg C. Schefold
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dorota Studzińska
- Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Michael Joannidis
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sandra Oeyen
- Department of Intensive Care 1K12IC, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Brian Marsh
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Finn H. Andersen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway,Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Rui Moreno
- Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Neurocríticos e Trauma, Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Lisboa (Nova Médical School), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Christian Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Wojciech Szczeklik
- Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goo ZQ, Muthusamy KA. Early versus standard tracheostomy in ventilated patients in neurosurgical intensive care unit: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 98:162-167. [PMID: 35182846 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tracheostomy is performed in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation, who suffered catastrophic neurologic insult or upper airway obstruction. Thus far, there is no consensus on the optimal timing in performing a tracheostomy. This study aims to test whether early tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients in a neurosurgical setting would be associated with a shorter time of mechanical ventilation as compared to standard tracheostomy. METHODS This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at University Malaya Medical Centre from July 2019 to July 2021. The likelihood of prolonged ventilation was determined objectively using the TRACH score and the patient's clinical presentation. The outcomes measured were days of mechanical ventilation post-tracheostomy, days of neuro-intensive care unit stay, and days of hospital stay. Tracheostomy-related complications were collected. The data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS In all, 39 patients were randomly assigned. Of these, 20 were allocated to the early tracheostomy group (ET) and 19 were allocated to the standard tracheostomy group (ST). The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. The primary outcome, mean (SD) days of mechanical ventilation post-tracheostomy, was statistically different in the 2 groups- early 11.9 (9.3) days, standard 18.9 (32.5) days; p = 0.014. There were comparable tracheostomy-related complications in both groups. CONCLUSION Early tracheostomy is associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation in a neurosurgical intensive care unit setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Qiang Goo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Kalai Arasu Muthusamy
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Karna ST, Trivedi S, Singh P, Khurana A, Gouroumourty R, Dodda B, Saigal S, Sharma JP, Karna A, Shrivastava P, Hussain A, Gupta V, Behera G, Waindeskar V. Weaning Outcomes and 28-day Mortality after Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients in Central India: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26:85-93. [PMID: 35110850 PMCID: PMC8783235 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tracheostomy is integral in long-term intensive care of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. There is a paucity of studies on weaning outcomes and mortality after tracheostomy in COVID-19 in Indian scenario. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center, observational study of severe COVID-19 patients who underwent elective tracheostomy (n = 65) during critical care in a tertiary care institute in Central India from May 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Data were collected from Medical records, ICU charts, and follow-up visits by patient. A primary objective was to study the clinical characteristics, tracheostomy complications, weaning outcomes, and mortality at 28 and 60 days of ICU admission. We categorized the cohort into two groups (deceased and survivor) and studied association of clinical parameters with 28-day mortality. Cox Proportional regression analysis was applied to calculate the hazard ratio among the predictors of mortality with p value <0.05 as significant. Results Elective tracheostomy was done in 69 of 436 (15.8%) patients on invasive mechanical ventilation, of which 65 were included. Tracheostomy was percutaneous in 45/65 (69%) and surgical in 20/65 (31%) with timing from intubation as early in 41/65 and late in 24/65 with most common indication as weaning failure followed by anticipated prolonged ventilation. Tracheostomy complications were present in 29/65 (45%) patients with no difference in complication rates between timing and type of tracheostomy. Downsizing, decannulation, and weaning were successful in 22%, 32 (49%), and 35/65 (54%) patients after tracheostomy. The 28-day mortality was 30/65 (46%). The fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) requirement in survivors was lower (0.4–0.6, p = 0.015) with a higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio (118–200, p = 0.033). Early tracheostomy within 7 days of intubation was not associated with weaning or survival benefit. Conclusions We suggest that tracheostomy should be delayed to after 7 days of intubation, especially till FiO2 reduces to 0.5 with improvement in PaO2/FiO2 for better outcomes and avoiding a wasted procedure (CTRI/2021/07/034768). Study Highlights Tracheostomy is integral in care of COVID-19 patients needing prolonged ventilation. There is no difference in complications in early/late or percutaneous dilatational/surgical technique. We observed successful weaning post-tracheostomy in 54% patients. Mortality at 28 days was 46%. Early tracheostomy within 7 days of intubation did not improve weaning or survival. How to cite this article Karna ST, Trivedi S, Singh P, Khurana A, Gouroumourty R, Dodda B, et al. Weaning Outcomes and 28-day Mortality after Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients in Central India: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(1):85–93.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunaina Tejpal Karna
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Saurabh Trivedi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Pooja Singh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
- Pooja Singh, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, Phone: +91 9340969292, e-mail:
| | - Alkesh Khurana
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Revadi Gouroumourty
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Brahmam Dodda
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Saurabh Saigal
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Jai Prakash Sharma
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Amit Karna
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Pranav Shrivastava
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Aqeel Hussain
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Vikas Gupta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Gankalyan Behera
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Vaishali Waindeskar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ghattas C, Alsunaid S, Pickering EM, Holden VK. State of the art: percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:5261-5276. [PMID: 34527365 PMCID: PMC8411160 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-19-4121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Percutaneous tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and offers many benefits, including decreasing ICU length of stay and need for sedation while improving patient comfort, effective communication, and airway clearance. However, there is no consensus on the optimal timing of tracheostomy in ICU patients. Ultrasound (US) and bronchoscopy are useful adjunct tools to optimize procedural performance. US can be used pre-procedurally to identify vascular structures and to select the optimal puncture site, intra-procedurally to assist with accurate placement of the introducer needle, and post-procedurally to evaluate for a pneumothorax. Bronchoscopy provides real-time visual guidance from within the tracheal lumen and can reduce complications, such as paratracheal puncture and injury to the posterior tracheal wall. A step-by-step detailed procedural guide, including preparation and procedural technique, is provided with a team-based approach. Technical aspects, such as recommended equipment and selection of appropriate tracheostomy tube type and size, are discussed. Certain procedural considerations to minimize the risk of complications should be given in circumstances of patient obesity, coagulopathy, or neurologic illness. Herein, we provide a practical state of the art review of percutaneous tracheostomy in ICU patients. Specifically, we will address pre-procedural preparation, procedural technique, and post-tracheostomy management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Ghattas
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sammar Alsunaid
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Edward M Pickering
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Van K Holden
- Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Volo T, Stritoni P, Battel I, Zennaro B, Lazzari F, Bellin M, Michieletto L, Spinato G, Busatto C, Politi D, Spinato R. Elective tracheostomy during COVID-19 outbreak: to whom, when, how? Early experience from Venice, Italy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278:781-789. [PMID: 32656673 PMCID: PMC7354359 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06190-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The need for prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients is placing the otorhinolaryngologist in front of an increasing request for tracheostomy. Nowadays, there is uncertainty regarding the timing of tracheostomy, the prognosis of these patients and the safety of healthcare workers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tracheostomy placement in patients with COVID-19. METHODS A retrospective cohort study on 23 COVID 19 patients, to analyse the timing of tracheostomy, the risk factors associated with in-hospital death and the infection of the involved health care workers. Early tracheostomy was defined as ≤ 10 days and late ones > 10 days. RESULTS The mortality rate of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU that underwent tracheostomy was 18%. The overall mortality of patients admitted to ICU was 53%. The univariate analysis revealed that early tracheostomy, SOFA score > 6, and D-dimer level > 4 were significantly associated with a greater risk of death. At the multivariate analysis SOFA score > 6 and D-dimer level > 4 resulted as significant factors for a higher risk of death. No health care workers associated with tracheostomy are confirmed to be infected by SARS-CoV2. CONCLUSION We suggest to wait at least 14 days to perform tracheostomy. In patients with SOFA score > 6 and D dimer > 4, tracheostomy should not be performed or should be postponed. Optimized procedures and enhanced personal protective equipment can make the tracheostomy safe and beneficial in COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Volo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mestre Hospital, via Paccagnella 11, 30174, Venice, Italy.
| | - P Stritoni
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mestre Hospital, via Paccagnella 11, 30174, Venice, Italy
| | - I Battel
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Venice Hospital, 30122, Venice, Italy
| | - B Zennaro
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mestre Hospital, via Paccagnella 11, 30174, Venice, Italy
| | - F Lazzari
- Department of Critical Care, Mestre Hospital, 30174, Venice, Italy
| | - M Bellin
- Department of Critical Care, Mestre Hospital, 30174, Venice, Italy
| | - L Michieletto
- Department of Pneumology, Mestre Hospital, 30174, Venice, Italy
| | - G Spinato
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Padova, 31100, Treviso, Italy
| | - C Busatto
- DISIA, Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti", University of Florence, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - D Politi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mestre Hospital, via Paccagnella 11, 30174, Venice, Italy
| | - R Spinato
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mestre Hospital, via Paccagnella 11, 30174, Venice, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Association With Hospital Mortality and Factors Associated With Removal of Tracheostomy Tube at ICU Discharge. A Cohort Study on 121 Patients. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:261-270. [PMID: 33201005 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Early tracheotomy, defined as a procedure performed within 10 days from intubation, is associated with more ventilator free days, shorter ICU stay, and lower mortality than late tracheotomy. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, it was especially important to save operating room resources and to have a shorter ICU stay for patients, when ICUs had insufficient beds. In this context of limited resources, early percutaneous tracheostomy could be an effective way to manage mechanically ventilated patients. Nevertheless, current recommendations suggest delaying or avoiding the tracheotomy in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Aim of the study was to analyze the hospital mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 patients who had received early percutaneous tracheostomy and factors associated with removal of tracheostomy cannula at ICU discharge. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING Coronavirus disease 2019 ICU. PATIENTS Adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019 3 days after ICU admission. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Three days after ICU admission, 164 patients were present in ICU and included in the analysis. One-hundred and twenty-one patients (74%) were tracheostomized, whereas the other 43 (26%) were managed with translaryngeal intubation only. In multivariable analysis, early percutaneous tracheostomy was associated with lower hospital mortality. Sixty-six of tracheostomized patients (55%) were discharged alive from the hospital. Age and male sex were the only characteristics that were independently associated with mortality in the tracheostomized patients (45.5% and 62.8% in tracheostomized and nontracheostomized patients, respectively; p = 0.009). Tracheostomy tube was removed in 47 of the tracheostomized patients (71%). The only variable independently associated with weaning from tracheostomy at ICU discharge was a faster start of spontaneous breathing after tracheotomy was performed. CONCLUSIONS Early percutaneous tracheostomy was safe and effective in coronavirus disease 2019 patients, giving a good chance of survival and of weaning from tracheostomy cannula at ICU discharge.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gazda AJ, Kwak MJ, Jani P, Dinh K, Hussain R, Dronavalli G, Warner M, Salas De Armas I, Kumar S, Nathan S, Kar B, Gregoric ID, Patel B, Akkanti B. Association Between Early Tracheostomy and Delirium in Older Adults in the United States. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35:1974-1980. [PMID: 33487531 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Early tracheostomy (fewer than eight days after intubation) is associated with shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. Studies assessing the association between early tracheostomy and incidence of delirium, however, are lacking. This investigation sought to fill this gap. DESIGN Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING Multi-institutional acute care facilities in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Data were derived from the National Inpatient Sample data from 2010 to 2014. Included patients were 65 or older and underwent both intubation and tracheostomy during the hospitalization. The authors excluded patients who underwent multiple intubations or tracheostomy procedures. INTERVENTIONS Early tracheostomy versus non-early tracheostomy. RESULTS In total, 23,310 patients were included, of whom 24.8% underwent early tracheostomy. From multivariate logistic regression, early tracheostomy was associated with lower odds of having a delirium diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, p < 0.00001) across all admission classifications. Upon subgroup analysis, early tracheostomy was associated significantly with lower odds of having delirium for patients admitted with medical (OR 0.74, p < 0.00001) and nonsurgical injury admissions (OR 0.74, p = 0.00116). CONCLUSIONS Early tracheostomy was associated significantly with lower odds of delirium among all patients studied. This association held true across medical and nonsurgical subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Gazda
- Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Min Ji Kwak
- Department of Internal Medicine: Geriatric and Palliative Care Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Pushan Jani
- Department of Internal Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Kha Dinh
- Department of Internal Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Rahat Hussain
- Department of Internal Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Goutham Dronavalli
- Department of Internal Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Mark Warner
- Department of Internal Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Ismael Salas De Armas
- Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapeutics and Transplantation, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Sachin Kumar
- Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapeutics and Transplantation, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Sriram Nathan
- Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapeutics and Transplantation, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Biswajit Kar
- Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapeutics and Transplantation, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Igor D Gregoric
- Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapeutics and Transplantation, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Bela Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Bindu Akkanti
- Department of Internal Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Samiei Nasr D, Khoundabi B, Monshizadeh Azar G, Malekmohammad M, Jamaati H, Hashemian SM. Beneficial Outcomes of Early Tracheostomy in Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. TANAFFOS 2020; 19:350-355. [PMID: 33959172 PMCID: PMC8088151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering that tracheostomy is being done for huge amount of critically ill patients, the ideal time for this procedure is still controversial among different intensive care units (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS 70 intubated patients were included in our study which was sorted into two subgroups: half of our patients received an early tracheostomy (ET) within 1-10 days post intubation and the rest received late tracheostomy (LT) within 11-21 days after getting intubated. RESULTS 61.9% of the study population was male and the mean age was of 54 + 10.5 years. ET group mean Mechanical Ventilation (MV) duration was 8.11±4.9 days and was 16.3 ± 6.01 in the LT group (p<0.05) with a mean sedation duration of 6.1 ± 4.4 vs. 12.0 ± 6.5 (ET vs. LT) (p<0.05). Mean time of weaning process from ventilator was 2.7 ±2.3 for ET group and 5.5 ± 5.0 for LT group (p<0.05). The Mean ICU stay was 18.8 ± 2.2 in the ET group, and 22.1 ± 4.1 in the LT group (p: 0.98) at the same time. Length of stay at hospital for two group of patients did not show a meaningful difference (p= 0.279). CONCLUSION Early tracheostomy decreases duration of mechanical ventilation and sedation use and more rapid weaning process in those patients who will require mechanical ventilation. Our findings revealed that tracheostomy timing has no significant impact on rate of hospital mortality and LOS at ICU and hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danial Samiei Nasr
- Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center (CRDRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Batoul Khoundabi
- Iran Helal Institute of Applied-Science and Technology, Research Center For Health Management in Mass Gathering, Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Majid Malekmohammad
- Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center (CRDRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Jamaati
- Lung Transplantation Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohammadreza Hashemian
- Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center (CRDRC), National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Objectives: To respond to the new recommendations for delaying tracheostomy for coronavirus disease 2019 patients to day 21 post-intubation to ensure viral clearance. Design: Prospective observational cohort from April 1, 2020, to April 30, 2020, with 60 days follow-up. Setting: Academic medical center with nine adult ICUs dedicated to caring for coronavirus disease 2019 patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Patients: Mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia requiring tracheostomy for prolonged ventilatory support. Interventions: Adherence to the standard of care for timing of tracheostomy as deemed necessary by the intensivist without delay and utilizing the existing tracheostomy team in performing the needed procedures within 1 day of the request. Measurements and Main Results: One hundred eleven patients with coronavirus disease 2019 received tracheostomy in the month of April 2020. Median time to tracheostomy was 11 days. All procedures were performed percutaneously at bedside under bronchoscopic guidance. Sixty-three percent of patients who received tracheostomy either weaned or discharged alive within 60 days of the procedure. Performing tracheostomy on these patients without delay did not lead to coronavirus disease 2019 viral transmission to the tracheostomy team as evident by lack of symptoms and negative antibody testing. Conclusions: Adherence to standard of care in timing of tracheostomy is safe. Recommending delaying the procedure may lead to harmful consequences from prolonging mechanical ventilation and sedation without apparent benefit.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ishaque S, Haque A, Qazi SH, Mallick H, Nasir S. Elective Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Children: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience From a Lower-Middle Income Country. Cureus 2020; 12:e9080. [PMID: 32789032 PMCID: PMC7416984 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure amongst critically ill patients, especially in cases of prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). This study aimed to describe the indications, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of elective pediatric tracheostomies in critically ill children at our center. Methods A retrospective review of medical records of children who underwent elective tracheostomies in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) was conducted from January 2009 to June 2018. Data were extracted based on demographics, indications of tracheostomy, and patient outcomes. Results were reported as mean with standard deviation and as frequencies with percentage. Results Of the 3,200 patients admitted to the PICU during the study period, 1,130 were intubated. A total of 48 (4.2% of 1,130) children underwent an elective tracheostomy. 30/48 (62.5%) children had an early tracheostomy. 34/48 (71%) patients were males. Approximately 25% of our patients undergoing a tracheostomy had an underlying neurological condition as the primary diagnosis, followed by respiratory conditions (23%). The most common indications for elective tracheostomy were PMV (>7 days) (n=24, 50%) and extubation failure (n=9, 18.7%). Early tracheostomy (<14 days) had better patient outcomes in terms of ventilator-free days (8.57±4.64 in early tracheostomy vs. 6.38±6.17 days in late tracheostomy, P=0.04). The sedation-free days and ICU-free days were also significantly increased in the early tracheostomy group than in the late tracheostomy group. The successful weaning and ICU discharge rate were significantly higher in the early tracheostomy group than in the late tracheostomy group (78.1% vs. 59.7%, P<0.05; and 69.2% vs. 49.5%, P<0.05, respectively). Ventilator-associated pneumonia was more common in the late tracheostomy group (n= 14, 77%), compared to early tracheostomy group (n=12, 40%) (P=0.03). Two patients expired from tracheostomy-related complications. Conclusion PMV was the most common indication for an elective tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy is associated with improved patient outcomes; therefore, a standardized approach toward mechanically ventilated children is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidra Ishaque
- Pediatrics, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Anwar Haque
- Pediatrics, The Indus Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Saqib H Qazi
- Pediatric Surgery, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, PAK
| | - Hamdan Mallick
- Medicine, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Saad Nasir
- Internal Medicine, United Medical and Dental College, Creek General Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Early versus late tracheostomy in patients with traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:1286-1287. [PMID: 32162030 PMCID: PMC7223371 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-05998-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
20
|
Ziyaeifard M, Azarfarin R. Introducing a new instrument "Downpipe endotracheal tube" for improving the safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020; 25:16. [PMID: 32174988 PMCID: PMC7053166 DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_569_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is the most commonly used minimally invasive procedure in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, during the procedure withdrawal, the endotracheal tube (ET) may cause substantial gas leak and sometimes the airway could be lost, and the patient exposed to severe hypoxemia. In order to prevent hypoxemia during ET withdrawal and needle stuck in ET during PDT and also for performing the procedure more safe and easy. Material and Methods: In this study, we introduce a new instrument “downpipe endotracheal tube” that has been registered as a patent and examined it in eight patients to confirm practical advantage of this tube. Results: These patients were five female and three male, with a mean weight of 71.7 kg and the mean age of 65.12 years. The cause of tracheostomy was difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: The procedure was safe in all cases. We did not find any complications during the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Ziyaeifard
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Rasoul Azarfarin
- Echocardiography Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gupta S, Dixit S, Choudhry D, Govil D, Mishra RC, Samavedam S, Zirpe K, Srinivasan S, Mohamed Z, Gupta KV, Wanchoo J, Chakrabortty N, Gurav S. Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24:S31-S42. [PMID: 32205955 PMCID: PMC7085814 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-g23184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation undergo tracheostomy to facilitate weaning. The practice in India may be different from the rest of the world and therefore, in order to understand this, ISCCM conducted a multicentric observational study "DIlatational percutaneous vs Surgical tracheoStomy in intEnsive Care uniT: A practice pattern observational multicenter study (DISSECT Study)" followed by an ISCCM Expert Panel committee meeting to formulate Practice recommendations pertinent to Indian ICUs. MATERIALS AND METHODS All existing International guidelines on the topic, various randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis, systematic reviews, retrospective studies were taken into account to formulate the guidelines. Wherever Indian data was not available, international data was analysed. A modified Grade system was followed for grading the recommendation. RESULTS After analyzing the entire available data, the recommendations were made by the grading system agreed by the Expert Panel. The recommendations took into account the indications and contraindications of tracheostomy; effect of timing of tracheostomy on incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia, ICU length of stay, ventilator free days & Mortality; comparison of surgical and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in terms of incidence of complications and cost to the patient; Comparison of various techniques of PDT; Use of fiberoptic bronchoscope and ultrasound in PDT; experience of the operator and qualification; certain special conditions like coagulopathy and morbid obesity. CONCLUSION This document presents the first Indian recommendations on tracheostomy in adult critically ill patients based on the practices of the country. These guidelines are expected to improve the safety and extend the indications of tracheostomy in critically ill patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE Gupta S, Dixit S, Choudhry D, Govil D, Mishra RC, Samavedam S, Tracheostomy in Adult Intensive Care Unit: An ISCCM Expert Panel Practice Recommendations. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(Suppl 1):S31-S42.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Gupta
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Subhal Dixit
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sanjeevan & MJM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India, , e-mail:
| | - Dhruva Choudhry
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Health Sciences Rohtak, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Deepak Govil
- Department of Critical Care, Institute of Critical Care & Anesthesiology, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | | | - Srinivas Samavedam
- Department of Critical Care, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Kapil Zirpe
- Department of Neurocritical Care, Ruby Hall Clinic, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India, , e-mail:
| | - Shrikanth Srinivasan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, New Delhi, India, , e-mail:
| | - Zubair Mohamed
- Department of Organ Transplant Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, India, , e-mail:
| | - Kv Venkatesha Gupta
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, , e-mail:
| | - Jaya Wanchoo
- Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Neurosciences, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India, , e-mail:
| | - Nilanchal Chakrabortty
- Department of Neurointensive Care, Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, , e-mail:
| | - Sushma Gurav
- Department of Neurocritical Care, Ruby Hall Clinic, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India, , e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|