Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transl Med. Nov 28, 2026; 12(4): 124866
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.124866
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.124866
Table 1 Potential peptide-based therapies in inflammatory bowel disease with current clinical data
| Peptide | Class/mechanism | Route | IBD population | Highest evidence | Study design / | Duration | Principal result | Evidence maturity/source |
| Anti-inflammatory peptides | ||||||||
| Icotrokinra[48,49] | Selective IL-23 receptor antagonist; inhibits IL-23 mediated inflammatory signaling | Oral | Moderate-to-severe UC | Phase 2b human interventional study | Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose ranging RCT (n = 252). 100 mg, 200 mg or 400 mg daily vs placebo | Primary assessment 12 weeks. Exploratory follow up to week 28 | All doses met week-12 endpoint (clinical response vs placebo). Clinical, endoscopic and biomarker responses persisted through exploratory week-28 analyses | Level 1: Human interventional. Conference abstract/trial reporting |
| K(D)PT[50-52] | Tripeptide derivative of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone; anti-inflammatory and epithelial barrier-supportive effects | Oral | Mild-to-moderate UC | Phase 2a human interventional study | Multicentre phase 2a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n = 162). 20 mg, 50 mg or 100 mg twice daily vs placebo as add-on therapy | 12 weeks | Pooled K(D)PT improved remission at weeks 2 and 4 and CAI response at week 8. Remission later converged with placebo because of a high placebo response | Level 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed |
| CGMP[53-55] | Bovine milk-derived glycopeptide; proposed anti-inflammatory, microbiome modifying and barrier-supportive effects | Oral | Active distal UC | Pilot human interventional study | Randomized open-label pilot study (n = 24). CGMP vs mesalamine escalation | 4 weeks comparative treatment; follow-up to 8 weeks | At week 4, there were no significant between-group differences in SCCAI improvement or stability, with broadly similar changes in endoscopic disease extent and severity | Level 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed |
| Barrier protective and mucosal healing peptides | ||||||||
| GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide)[96,99,100] | GLP-1 receptor agonist; proposed anti-inflammatory and intestinal barrier-supportive effects, alongside established metabolic actions | Subcutaneous | UC and CD. Predominantly concomitant T2DM and/or obesity | Human observational evidence | Multiple retrospective studies. Largest cohort (n = 3737). Exposed vs non-exposed with adjustment | Longitudinal follow-up; study dependent | GLP-1 agonist exposure was associated with lower composite risk of hospitalisation, surgery, steroid dependence, treatment escalation, mortality | Level 3: Human observational. Peer reviewed observational studies/systematic review |
| Teduglutide[108-110] | GLP-2 analogue; promotion of intestinal epithelial growth, repair and barrier integrity | Subcutaneous | Moderate-to-severe CD | Phase 2 human interventional study | Pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging (n = 100). Teduglutide vs placebo | 8 weeks placebo-controlled treatment; optional 12-week extension | Greater clinical remission and response compared to placebo; differences were not statistically significant | Level 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed |
| EGF[111-113] | Growth-factor peptide; promotes epithelial restitution, proliferation and mucosal healing | Topical enema | Mild-to-moderate left sided UC or proctitis | Human interventional RCT | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n = 24). EGF vs placebo in conjunction with oral mesalamine | 14 days treatment; follow-up to 12 weeks | Week-2 remission was more frequent with EGF than placebo; clinical, endoscopic and histologic outcomes also favoured EGF, with initial response maintained through 12 weeks | Level 1: Human interventional. Peer-reviewed |
| TFF3[111,112,114] | Intestinal repair peptide; promotes epithelial restitution, mucus integrity and mucosal barrier repair | Topical enema | Mild-moderate left-sided UC | Human interventional RCT | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT (n = 16). TFF3 vs saline placebo in conjunction with oral mesalamine | 14 days treatment; follow-up to 12 weeks | No treatment benefit over placebo noted | Level 1: Human interventional. Peer reviewed |
Table 2 Comparison between therapeutic peptides, small molecules and biologics
| Therapeutic peptides | Small molecule drugs | Biologics | |
| Advantages | High affinity binding | High oral bioavailability | High affinity binding |
| High specificity | High membrane permeability | High specificity | |
| Modulate protein-protein interactions without well-defined binding pocket | High gastric stability | Minimal off-target effects | |
| Wide range of targets | Lower manufacturing costs | ||
| Predictable degradation products | Low immunogenicity | ||
| Minimal off-target toxicities | |||
| Low immunogenicity | |||
| Weaknesses | Low oral bioavailability | Risk of off-target effects | Requires parenteral administration |
| Require a well-defined binding pocket | |||
| Short half-life & rapid serum clearance | High immunogenicity-risk of anti-drug antibody formation | ||
| Low membrane permeability | Low membrane permeability | ||
| Low gastric stability | High manufacturing costs |
Table 3 Clinical trials of peptide-based therapies in inflammatory bowel disease
| Agent | Mechanism | Phase and design | Population | Primary endpoint | Status |
| Icotrokinra | Oral interleukin-23 receptor antagonist | Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging (ANTHEM-UC) | Moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis | Clinical response at week 12 | Completed; reported in conference abstract form |
| Icotrokinra | Oral interleukin-23 receptor antagonist | Phase 3 programme | Moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis | Not yet reported | Ongoing; recruiting |
| K(D)PT | Tripeptide derivative of alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone | Phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis | Time to sustained clinical remission (colitis activity index 3 or less) | Completed; no confirmatory trial reported |
| Casein glycomacropeptide | Bovine milk-derived immunomodulatory peptide | Randomized open-label pilot study | Active distal ulcerative colitis | Change in simple clinical colitis activity index and endoscopic activity | Completed |
| Teduglutide | Glucagon-like peptide-2 analogue | Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging | Moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease | Remission or response by Crohn’s disease activity index at week 8 | Completed; not progressed for this indication |
| Epidermal growth factor enema | Growth-factor peptide promoting epithelial restitution | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Mild-to-moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis | Clinical and endoscopic remission | Completed |
| Trefoil factor 3 enema | Trefoil peptide supporting mucosal repair | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Mild-to-moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis | Clinical improvement | Terminated for lack of efficacy |
- Citation: Karunadasa H, Vasudevan A. Therapeutic peptides in inflammatory bowel disease: From mechanistic rationale to clinical translation. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 124866
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6132/full/v12/i4/124866.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5528/wjtm.124866