BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transl Med. Sep 28, 2026; 12(3): 124965
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.124965
Table 1 Major environmental exposure classes implicated in steatotic liver disease and their principal hepatic effects
Exposure class
Representative sources/examples
Principal hepatic mechanism(s)
Representative human or experimental evidence
Ref.
PFASNon-stick coatings, food packaging, firefighting foams; PFOA, PFOS, PFHxSPPARα activation, ACOX1-mediated peroxisomal oxidative stress, bile-acid and lipid remodelingNHANES and cohort associations with NAFLD; PFAS track with biopsy steatosis grade and fibrosis; sex-specific liver-metabolome effects; prenatal exposure and child liver injury[10,13,31,33-35]
Micro- and nanoplasticsFragmented environmental plastics in water, food, air; polyethylene, polystyreneDirect hepatotoxicity, ROS/oxidative stress, lipid dysmetabolism; gut-liver axis; vector for adsorbed contaminantsDetected in cirrhotic and other human liver tissue; systemic distribution; hepatotoxicity/steatosis in organoids; fibrosis and aflatoxin synergy in mice[18,23,24,37-39]
PhthalatesPlasticizers in packaging, medical devices, cosmetics; DEHP, DINPEndocrine disruption; LXR/SREBP-1c and PPARα lipogenic signalingUrinary metabolites associated with NAFLD (meta-analytic OR = 1.18); DINP metabolite OR > 4; DEHP worsens steatosis in obesity[4,9,16,40]
BisphenolsPolycarbonate plastics, resin linings; bisphenol A and analogs (BPS, BPF)Gut microbiota remodeling, FXR/TGR5 suppression, ↑bile-acid synthesis and lipogenesisNHANES urinary BPA associated with NAFLD (OR up to 1.7; meta-analytic OR = 1.43); FMT-transmissible steatosis; analogs also steatogenic[9,28,41-43]
Persistent and current-use pollutants/pesticidesPCBs, dioxins, organochlorine and glyphosate-based pesticidesPXR/CAR/PPAR and AhR activation; diet-dependent obesogen effectPCB153 worsens steatosis with high-fat diet; NHANES PCB/Lead/mercury and ALT elevation; dioxin steatohepatitis; ultra-low-dose glyphosate NAFLD signature[12,14,15,17,44,45,49]
Toxic metalsArsenic, cadmium, chromiumHepatic inflammation; gut-FXR-bile acid axis; genotoxic/epigeneticMetal-induced hepatic inflammation along fibrosis-HCC axis; cadmium dysbiosis-FXR injury (meta-analytic OR = 1.37); arsenic and HCC[9,25,26,29]
Air pollutionAmbient fine particulate matter (PM2.5), NOxPulmonary and hepatic oxidative stress; hepatic lipid reprogrammingUK Biobank: PM/NOx and incident NAFLD/cirrhosis. Rome cohort: Pollutants and incident cirrhosis[19,46-48]
Dietary mycotoxinAflatoxin B1 (contaminated staples)Genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis; interaction with HCV/alcoholAlbumin-adduct biomarker prospectively increases HCC risk; synergy with HCV/alcohol[51]
Industrial volatilesVinyl chloride (occupational)Mitochondrial damage; sensitization to second inflammatory hit (TASH)80% steatohepatitis and 55% fibrosis in exposed non-obese workers; potentiation of LPS injury[20,50]
Table 2 Key challenges and proposed solutions for advancing the hepatic exposome in clinical hepatology
Challenge
Description
Proposed solution/future direction
Exposure measurementSingle biomarkers poorly capture lifetime exposure; non-persistent chemicals fluctuate, persistent ones bioaccumulateSerial biomonitoring within prospective cohorts; couple to untargeted exposomics-metabolomics to read biological response
Reverse causation and confoundingDiseased liver alters chemical handling and serum levels; diet and socioeconomics co-varyProspective designs establishing temporality; pre-diagnostic biospecimens; careful covariate control
Inconsistent and heterogeneous evidenceMeta-analyses show robust associations for some chemicals but null/inverse for others; unstable sensitivity analysesHarmonized exposure and outcome definitions; individual-participant-data pooling; transparent reporting
Chemical mixturesHumans are exposed to dynamic combinations with additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effectsMixture-aware statistical methods; nutrient-toxicant and exposure-exposure interaction studies
Susceptibility and sex differencesHepatic response is host-dependent; women and early-life windows show heightened riskSex-stratified analyses adequately powered; life-course and developmental cohort designs
Causal inferenceMuch evidence is observational and mechanistic data often single-chemical/high-doseHuman liver organoids and microphysiological models; Mendelian-randomization-style and quasi-experimental approaches
Clinical translationNo validated tools to detect or stratify exposome-associated liver injuryDevelop and validate a hepatic exposome biomarker panel of exposure and effect; integrate exposure history into care
Prevention and regulationExposures are largely involuntary and ubiquitousUpstream regulatory action on water, air, and food packaging; surveillance of regrettable substitution


Write to the Help Desk