Efficacy and safety of 6-mm vs 8-mm covered stents for tips creation: A meta-analysis

doi:10.5528/wjtm.124020

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 3

This Article

(3)

(4)

(0)

(48)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN

2220-6132

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Transl Med. Sep 28, 2026; 12(3): 124020
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.124020

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Forest plot. A: Risk ratio for overall hepatic encephalopathy, 6 mm vs 8 mm; B: Risk ratio for overt hepatic encephalopathy; C: Risk ratio for overall survival at 2 years; D: Risk ratio for achievement of target portal pressure gradient below 12 mmHg; E: Mean difference in post procedural portal pressure gradient (mmHg); F: Risk ratio for shunt dysfunction; G: Risk ratio for variceal rebleeding at 2 years.

Citation: Arsalan M, Sawaira F, Bhatti U, Hassan T, Shah SM, Dawar SU, Shah SNA, Shehroz R, Mughees M, Yasir M, Mal M, Hasan AH. Efficacy and safety of 6-mm vs 8-mm covered stents for tips creation: A meta-analysis. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(3): 124020
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6132/full/v12/i3/124020.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5528/wjtm.124020

Arsalan M, Sawaira F, Bhatti U, Hassan T, Shah SM, Dawar SU, Shah SNA, Shehroz R, Mughees M, Yasir M, Mal M, Hasan AH. Efficacy and safety of 6-mm vs 8-mm covered stents for tips creation: A meta-analysis. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(3): 124020 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.124020]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.