Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Nephrol. Feb 6, 2015; 4(1): 138-147
Published online Feb 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.138
Table 1 Characteristics and qualities of the studies included in the analysis of tadalafil, sildenafil and vardenafil
Ref.SampleDrug (mg)
DurationRun-inInclusion criteriaPublications
sizeTrialControl(wk)period (wk)
Tadalafil
Brock et al[39]10895Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sBJU Int
Dmochowski et al[13]20020Placebo124Mean age ≥ 40, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13J Urol
Donatucci et al[14]4272.5, 5, 10, 20Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13BJU Int
Egerdie et al[15]6062.5, 5Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sJ Sex Med
Kim et al[16]1025Placebo126Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sLUTS
McVary et al[18]2815 + 20Placebo6 + 64Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sJ Urol
Oelke et al[19]3435Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sEur Urol
Porst et al[21]5812.5, 5, 10, 20Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sEur Urol
Porst et al[36]3255Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sEur Urol
Porst et al[20]15005Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sUrology
Roehrborn et al[22]10582.5, 5, 10, 20Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45-60, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/s, PVR 150-550 mLJ Urol
Roehrborn et al[12]15005Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/sJ Urol
Takeda et al[24]6105Placebo124Mean age ≥ 40, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13J Urol
Yokoyama et al[25]4602.5, 5Placebo122Mean age ≥ 45, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 13 Qmax 4-15 mL/s, prostate volume ≥ 20 mLInt J Urol
Sildenafil
McVary et al[10]36950, 100Placebo124Mean age ≥ 45, IIEF ≤ 25, IPSS ≥ 12J Urol
Vardenafil
Stief et al[40]22210Placebo84Mean age ≥ 45-64, LUTS/BPH ≥ 6 mo, IPSS ≥ 12Eur Urol
Table 2 Least squares mean changes from baseline to end-point in lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia in clinical studies for treatment in subjects with erectile dysfunction and without erectile dysfunction
Ref.DrugRemarksTotal IPSS
IPSS voiding subscore
IPSS storage subscore
IPSS QoL subscore
BII
Qmax
IIEF
mgTPTPTPTPTPTPTP
Tadalafil
Brock et al[39]5ED-5.7-3.3-3.5-1.9-2.2-1.3-1.1-0.7-1.6-0.9
5No ED-5.4-3.3-3.5-2-1.9-1.3-1-1.4-1
Dmochowski et al[13]20-9.2-5.1-5.6-2.8-3.6-2.30.40.5
Donatucci et al[14]2.5-5.7-4.1-3.8-2.5-1.9-1.6-1.2-0.9-1.3-1.25.57.2
5-5.0-2.8-2.1-1.1-1.45.3
10-5.7-3.6-1.8-1.3-1.43.7
20-4.6-3-2.1-11.27.6
Egerdie et al[15]2.5-6.1-3.8-2.7-2.2-1.9-1.6-0.9-0.8-2.1-1.26.51.8
5-4.6-3.6-2.5-1-1.65.2
Kim et al[16]5-5.6-3.62.52.3
McVary et al[18]5-6.2-3.9-4-2.5-2.2-1.4-0.7-0.3-0.7-0.40.50.96.70.7
5/20-7.1-4.5-4.4-2.8-2.7-1.8-0.5-0.2-1.3-0.60.58.41.6
Oelke et al[19]5-6.3-4.2-4.1-2.6-2.2-1.6-1.3-12.41.2
Porst et al[21]2.5-4.2-2.18.22
5-4.77.9
10-4.76.8
20-3.65.4
Porst et al[36]5-5.6-3.6-3.3-2.3-2.3-1.3-1.8-1.36.72
Porst et al[20]5-7.9-5.1
Roehrborn et al[22]2.5-5.17-2.27-2.94-1.26-1.96-0.99-0.92-0.49-1.38-0.831.961.248.342.2
5-3.88-2.23-2.07-0.88-1.41.417.98
10-5.21-3.12-1.58-0.74-0.961.646.97
20-4.87-3.13-1.89-0.86-1.451.585.59
Roehrborn et al[12]5Qmax < 10-5.2-3.6-3.2-2.12.82.4
5Qmax of 10-15-6.3-3.8-3.9-2.51.40.9
5Qmax > 15-6.8-2.7-3.9-1.2-1.1-2.7
Takeda et al[24]5-6-4.5-2-1.4-2-1.4-2-1.4
Yokoyama et al[25]2.5-5-3-3.3-1.9-1.7-1.1-0.8-0.5-1-0.81.32.1
5-5.1-3.72-1.5-0.8-1.11.6
Sildenafil
McVary et al[10]50-6.3-1.9-0.9-0.3-2-0.90.310.169.171.86
100
Vardenafil
Stief et al[40]10-5.8-3.61.61
Table 3 Outcomes of the meta-analysis of total international prostate symptom score, international prostate symptom score storage subscore, international prostate symptom score voiding subscore, international prostate symptom score quality of life subscore, benign prostatic hyperplasia impact index, maximum urinary flow rate, and international index of erectile function score in lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia or lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction patients
Outcome orStudiesParticipantsWeightStatisticalEffect EstimateHeterogeneity
OverallP value
subgroupmethod(Mean difference, 95%CI)χ2I2(%)Z value
Total IPSS in LUTS/BPH139131100%Fixed-2.17 (-2.42, -1.91)16.44016.75< 0.00001
Tadalafil11857695.5%Fixed-2.14 (-2.40, -1.88)13.27016.18< 0.00001
Sildenafil13411.0%Fixed-4.40 (-6.87, -1.93)3.480.001
Vardenafil12143.4%Fixed-2.20 (-3.57, -0.83)3.140.002
Total IPSS in LUTS/BPH and ED63626100%Fixed-1.97 (-2.43, -1.51)12.3338.41< 0.00001
Tadalafil5328596.6%Fixed-1.88 (-2.35, -1.41)8.4907.90< 0.00001
Sildenafil13413.4%Fixed-4.40 (-6.87, -1.93)3.480.001
IPSS storage subscore in LUTS/BPH
Tadalafil106848100%Fixed-0.71 (-0.85, -0.57)12.6409.96< 0.00001
IPSS voiding subscore in LUTS/BPH
Tadalafil117916100%Fixed-1.23 (-1.41, -1.04)24.71513.28< 0.00001
IPSS QoL subscore in LUTS/BPH85999100%Fixed-0.33 (-0.40, -0.26)8.2608.70< 0.00001
Tadalafil7564897.7%Fixed-0.32 (-0.40, -0.25)6.2608.38< 0.00001
Sildenafil13512.3%Fixed-0.68 (-1.17, -0.19)2.710.007
BII in LUTS/BPH
Tadalafil53504100%Fixed-0.43 (-0.61, -0.25)3.8904.64< 0.00001
BII in LUTS/BPH and ED42561100%Fixed-0.52 (-0.74, -0.29)8.02134.51< 0.00001
Tadalafil3221094.8%Fixed-0.48 (-0.71, -0.25)6.5994.11< 0.0001
Sildenafil13515.2%Fixed-1.10 (-2.08, -0.12)2.190.03
Qmax in LUTS/BPH
Tadalafil (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg)9503464.9%Fixed0.22 (-0.04, 0.49)13.4331.650.10
Tadalafil (only 5 mg)7287635.1%Fixed0.33 (-0.13, 0.80)8.24242.140.03
IIEF in LUTS/BPH
Tadalafil22009100%Fixed4.88 (3.31, 8.97)2.2808.96< 0.00001
IIEF in LUTS/BPH and ED
Tadalafil31746100%Fixed4.54 (3.75, 5.33)7.331811.27< 0.00001