Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Nephrol. Jan 6, 2017; 6(1): 29-40
Published online Jan 6, 2017. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v6.i1.29
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1 The graphs show the quantitative evaluation of Angiotensin II immunostaining in renal tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; aP < 0.05 vs the respective NS group, cP < 0.05 vs the respective group without tempol. The photomicrographs represent Ang II immunostaining in NS, HS, NS-T and HS-T groups. Original magnification: 400 ×. IOD: Integrated optic density; NS: Normal salt diet group; HS: High salt diet group; NS-T: Normal salt diet plus tempol group; HS-T: High salt diet plus tempol group.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 The graphs show the quantitative evaluation of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 immunostaining in renal tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; aP < 0.05 vs the respective NS group, cP < 0.05 vs the respective group without tempol. The photomicrographs represent ACE2 immunostaining in NS, HS, NS-T and HS-T groups. Original magnification: 400 ×. IOD: Integrated optic density; NS: Normal salt diet group; HS: High salt diet group; NS-T: Normal salt diet plus tempol group; HS-T: High salt diet plus tempol group; ACE2: Angiotensin converting enzyme 2.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 The graphs show the quantitative evaluation of Angiotensin 1-7 immunostaining in renal tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; aP < 0.05 vs the respective NS group, cP < 0.05 vs the respective group without tempol. The photomicrographs represent Ang 1-7 immunostaining in NS, HS, NS-T and HS-T groups. Original magnification: 400 ×. IOD: Integrated optic density; NS: Normal salt diet group; HS: High salt diet group; NS-T: Normal salt diet plus tempol group; HS-T: High salt diet plus tempol group.
Figure 4
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 4 The graphs show the quantitative evaluation of Mas receptor immunostaining in renal tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; aP < 0.05 vs the respective NS group, cP < 0.05 vs the respective group without tempol. The photomicrographs represent MasR immunostaining in NS, HS, NS-T and HS-T groups. Original magnification: 400 ×. IOD: Integrated optic density; NS: Normal salt diet group; HS: High salt diet group; NS-T: Normal salt diet plus tempol group; HS-T: High salt diet plus tempol group; MasR: Mas receptor.
Figure 5
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 5 The graphs show the quantitative evaluation of angiotensin type 1 receptor immunostaining in renal tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; aP < 0.05 vs the respective NS group, cP < 0.05 vs the respective group without tempol. The photomicrographs represent AT1R immunostaining in NS, HS, NS-T and HS-T groups. Original magnification: 400 ×. IOD: Integrated optic density; NS: Normal salt diet group; HS: High salt diet group; NS-T: Normal salt diet plus tempol group; HS-T: High salt diet plus tempol group; AT1R: Angiotensin type 1 receptor.
Figure 6
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 6 The graphs show the quantitative evaluation of angiotensin type 2 receptor immunostaining in renal tissue. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; aP < 0.05 vs the respective group without tempol. The photomicrographs represent AT2R immunostaining in NS, HS, NS-T and HS-T groups. Original magnification: 400 ×. IOD: Integrated optic density; NS: Normal salt diet group; HS: High salt diet group; NS-T: Normal salt diet plus tempol group; HS-T: High salt diet plus tempol group; AT2R: Angiotensin type 2 receptor.