BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Virol. Sep 25, 2026; 15(3): 124097
Published online Sep 25, 2026. doi: 10.5501/wjv.124097
Table 1 Viral agents associated with encephalitis
Viral agent
Viral family/group
Common clinical context
Main diagnostic methods
Contribution of mNGS
Herpes simplex virus 1HerpesviridaeSporadic necrotizing encephalitis in adults, temporal lobe involvementCSF HSV PCR, MRI, EEGComplementary evaluation in PCR-negative, equivocal, or atypical cases
Herpes simplex virus 2HerpesviridaeNeonatal infection, meningoencephalitis, immunosuppressionCSF HSV PCR, serum/CSF testsSimultaneous detection within broad pathogen screening
Varicella zoster virusHerpesviridaeEncephalitis, meningoencephalitis, vasculopathy, immunosuppressionCSF VZV PCR, CSF anti-VZV antibodiesContribution to diagnosis of VZV neuroinfection without rash or with atypical presentation
EnterovirusesPicornaviridaeViral meningitis/encephalitis in children, brainstem encephalitisCSF PCR, respiratory/stool PCRTyping, genomic characterization, and detection of strains outside standard panels
ParechovirusPicornaviridaeSepsis-like illness and encephalitis in neonates and infantsCSF/blood PCRDiagnostic contribution in cases not covered by conventional panels
West Nile virusFlaviviridaeSeasonal arboviral encephalitis, neuroinvasive disease in older adultsSerum/CSF IgM, PCR, neutralization testsSupportive diagnosis in early-stage or geographically unexpected cases
Japanese encephalitis virusFlaviviridaeEncephalitis in endemic regions, travel-associated infectionCSF/serum IgM, PCRDetection in travel-associated cases or when targeted testing has not been performed
Tick-borne encephalitis virusFlaviviridaeTick exposure, Europe/Asia-associated encephalitisSerum/CSF IgM, PCRContribution in cases with tick exposure and inconclusive PCR/serology
Powassan virusFlaviviridaeTick-borne severe encephalitisSerology, PCR, public health laboratory testsDetection of rare arboviruses outside routine panels
Chikungunya virusTogaviridaeTravel-/outbreak-associated fever, arthralgia, rarely encephalitisPCR, IgM/IgG serologyDiagnostic contribution in atypical cases with neurological complications
Rabies virusRhabdoviridaeFatal encephalitis after animal exposureSaliva/skin biopsy PCR, serology, antigen testsMay assist in suspected cases not confirmed by conventional tests
JC virusPolyomaviridaeProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in immunocompromised patientsCSF JC virus PCR, MRIDetection during broad diagnostic evaluation in immunocompromised patients
CytomegalovirusHerpesviridaeAdvanced immunosuppression, transplantation, human immunodeficiency virusCSF/blood CMV PCRAssessment of opportunistic infection and coinfection
HHV-6HerpesviridaePost-transplant encephalitis, limbic encephalitisCSF HHV-6 PCR, viral loadRequires careful interpretation to distinguish reactivation, chromosomal integration, and true infection
AstrovirusAstroviridaeUnexplained encephalitis in immunocompromised patientsmNGS, confirmatory PCRIdentification of unexpected neurotropic agents
BornavirusBornaviridaeRare, severe/fatal encephalitis, zoonotic associationmNGS, PCR, serology, tissue examinationImportant contribution to discovery of novel or rare pathogens
Table 2 Representative viral findings detected or investigated by metagenomic next-generation sequencing and their clinical interpretation
Agent identified/investigated by mNGS
Specimen type
Clinical context
Contribution of mNGS
Points to consider in clinical interpretation
HSV-1/HSV-2CSFAcute necrotizing encephalitis, temporal lobe involvementComplementary diagnosis together with targeted PCR or in PCR-negative/equivocal casesEmpirical acyclovir should not be delayed while awaiting mNGS results
VZVCSFEncephalitis without rash, vasculopathy, immunosuppressionDetection of atypical VZV neuroinfectionCSF antibody testing may be more sensitive than PCR in some cases
EnterovirusCSF, stool, respiratory samplePediatric encephalitis, brainstem involvementDetection of the causative agent and genomic typingAlternative specimens may be useful if CSF viral load is low
West Nile virusCSF, serum/plasmaArboviral encephalitis, seasonal neuroinvasive diseaseDetection of viral RNA in early infection or unexpected casesShould be interpreted together with serology
Chikungunya virusCSF, serumTravel-/outbreak-associated neurological diseaseDiagnosis in atypical cases without targeted testingShould be supported by clinical and epidemiological history
Powassan virusCSF, serumSevere encephalitis after tick exposureIdentification of a rare arbovirusConfirmation by a public health laboratory may be required
AstrovirusCSF, brain tissueUndiagnosed encephalitis in immunocompromised patientsDiscovery of a neurotropic agent not included in conventional panelsContamination, systemic infection, and true CNS invasion should be distinguished
BornavirusCSF, brain tissueSevere/fatal encephalitis, zoonotic exposureDiscovery of a novel/rare pathogen and genomic characterizationTissue-level confirmation and epidemiological investigation are important
JC virusCSFLeukoencephalopathy in immunocompromised patientsDetection of an opportunistic viral agent during broad screeningShould be evaluated together with clinical and MRI findings
HHV-6CSFPost-transplant limbic encephalitisDetection of an opportunistic viral agent or reactivationChromosomal integration and latent reactivation should be considered
CMVCSF, bloodAdvanced immunosuppression, transplantationAssessment of systemic and CNS involvementShould be interpreted together with blood viral load and clinical presentation
Unknown/novel virusCSF, brain tissueUndiagnosed encephalitis, outbreak or zoonotic suspicionNovel pathogen discovery, phylogenetic analysisIndependent confirmation, negative controls, and epidemiological assessment are required
Table 3 Comparative summary of key clinical evidence on cerebrospinal fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing for central nervous system infection
Ref.
Population/workflow
Main findings
Key limitations
Clinical interpretation
Wilson et al[22]; prospective, multicenter204 patients with meningitis/encephalitis; clinical adjudication against conventional testing58 infections in 57 patients; 13/58 (22%) identified only by mNGS; 8/13 likely clinical effect; 7/13 guided treatmentMissed 11 serology-only, 7 non-CSF/tissue, and 8 low-titer infectionsAdds actionable diagnoses but cannot replace serology, tissue testing, or targeted assays
Xing et al[25]; prospective, multicenter213 patients with suspected infectious encephalitis/meningitismNGS positivity 57% in definite CNS infection and 42.6% in definite viral disease; AUC 0.659 at SSRN ≥ 2Performance depends on threshold, case definition, and pathogen spectrumUseful in selected unresolved cases; yield is not uniform across disease groups
Qu et al[27]; systematic review and meta-analysis12 studies; heterogeneous populations, assays, reference standards, and thresholdsPooled sensitivity 77% (95%CI: 70%-82%); specificity 96% (95%CI: 93%-98%); AUC 0.91; viral subgroup 82%/97%Specificity heterogeneity I2 = 72.07%; too few non-Illumina studies for platform comparisonPooled accuracy is promising but should not be applied as a universal assay estimate
Benoit et al[28]; seven-year clinical performance4828 CSF samples; adjudicated subset included 220 CNS infections14.4% of samples positive; mNGS alone identified 48/220 infections (21.8%); sensitivity 63.1%, specificity 99.6%, accuracy 92.9%Sensitivity rose to 86% against CSF direct detection alone, illustrating reference-standard effectsHigh specificity and meaningful incremental yield, with persistent sensitivity gaps


Write to the Help Desk