Despite advancements in Cytomegalovirus (CMV) management, its impact on graft function, mortality, and cardiovascular (CV) health of organ transplant recipients (OTR) remains a significant concern. We investigated the association between CMV infection and CV events (CVE) in organ (other than heart) transplant recipients.

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and EMBASE, including studies that reported on CMV infection or disease and post-transplantation CVE. Studies of heart transplant recipients were excluded.

We screened 3875 abstracts and 12 clinical studies were included in the final analysis, mainly in kidney and liver transplant recipients. A significant association was observed between CMV infection and an increased risk of CVE, with a pooled unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.99 (95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 1.45-2.73) for CMV infection and 1.59 (95% CI 1.21-2.10) for CMV disease. Pooled adjusted HR were 2.17 (95% CI 1.47-3.20) and 1.77 (95% CI 0.83-3.76), respectively. Heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0%) for CMV infection, suggesting consistent association across studies, and moderate-to-high for CMVdisease (I2 = 50% for unadjusted, 53% for adjusted HR).

We found a significant association between CMV infection and CV risk in abdominal OTR, underscoring the importance of proactive CMV surveillance and early treatment. Future research should aim for more standardized methodologies to fully elucidate the relationship between CMV and CV outcomes, potentially informing novel preventive and therapeutic strategies that could benefit the CV health of OTR.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation (LT). Based on current worldwide guidelines, the most effective strategies for avoiding post-transplant CMV infection are antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment. CMV- IgG serology is the established technique for pretransplant screening of both donors and recipients. The clinical presentation of CMV infection and disease exhibits variability, prompting clinicians to consistently consider this possibility, particularly within the first year post-transplantation or subsequent to heightened immunosuppression. At annual symposia to discuss CMV prevention and how treatment outcomes can be improved, evidence on the incorporation of immune functional tests into clinical practice is presented, and the results of studies with new antiviral treatments are evaluated. Although there are ongoing studies on the use of letermovir and maribavir in solid organ transplantation, a consensus reflected in the guidelines has not been formed. Determining the most appropriate strategy at the individual level appears to be the key to enhancing outcomes. Although prevention strategies reduce the risk of CMV disease, the disease can still occur in up to 50% of high-risk patients. A balance between the risk of infection and disease development and the use of immunosuppressants must be considered when talking about the proper management of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to establish a comprehensive framework for the management of CMV in patients who have had LT.

Posttransplantation complications pose a major challenge to the long-term survival and quality of life of organ transplant recipients. These complications encompass immune-mediated complications, infectious complications, metabolic complications, and malignancies, with each type influenced by various risk factors and pathological mechanisms. The molecular mechanisms underlying posttransplantation complications involve a complex interplay of immunological, metabolic, and oncogenic processes, including innate and adaptive immune activation, immunosuppressant side effects, and viral reactivation. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical features, risk factors, and molecular mechanisms of major posttransplantation complications. We systematically summarize the current understanding of the immunological basis of allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease, the metabolic dysregulation associated with immunosuppressive agents, and the role of oncogenic viruses in posttransplantation malignancies. Furthermore, we discuss potential prevention and intervention strategies based on these mechanistic insights, highlighting the importance of optimizing immunosuppressive regimens, enhancing infection prophylaxis, and implementing targeted therapies. We also emphasize the need for future research to develop individualized complication control strategies under the guidance of precision medicine, ultimately improving the prognosis and quality of life of transplant recipients.

Whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases the risk of cardiovascular complications after kidney transplantation (KT) through different indirect effects remains controversial.

We analyzed the incidence of post-transplant atherosclerotic (PAEs) and thrombotic events (PTEs) in 465 KT recipients according to the previous exposure to any level or high-level (≥1,000 IU/mL) CMV viremia (either asymptomatic or clinical disease) by means of landmark analysis beyond days 30, 180 and 360 after transplantation. Proportional hazards models were constructed with death and graft loss as competing risks.

After a median of 722 days, the cumulative incidences of PAE and PTE were 6.0% each. Most PAEs (53.6%) occurred beyond post-transplant day 360, whereas most PTEs (60.7%) were diagnosed between days 30-180.The incidence of PAE beyond day 180 was higher among patients with previous CMV viremia compared to those without (two-year rates: 4.7% versus 0.4%; P-value = 0.035). This difference was more pronounced in recipients developing high-level viremia (6.3% versus 0.7%, respectively; P-value = 0.013). After multivariate adjustment for age, pre-transplant cardiovascular risk, antiplatelet and statin therapy and graft function, however, associations were not maintained either for any-level (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-7.05) or high-level CMV viremia (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 0.78-10.36). No significant differences were found in the remaining landmark analyses (days 30 or 360) or for the outcome of PTE either.

Our study does not support that CMV infection independently contributes to the risk of PAE or PTE after KT.

Diabetes is common in patients waitlisted for liver transplantation because of end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular cancer as well as in posttransplant phase (posttransplantation diabetes mellitus). In both conditions, the presence of diabetes severely affects disease burden and long-term clinical outcomes; careful monitoring and appropriate treatment are pivotal to reduce cardiovascular events and graft and recipients' death. We thoroughly reviewed the epidemiology of diabetes in the transplant setting and the different therapeutic options, from lifestyle intervention to antidiabetic drug use-including the most recent drug classes available-and to the inclusion of bariatric surgery in the treatment cascade. In waitlisted patients, the old paradigm that insulin should be the treatment of choice in the presence of severe liver dysfunction is no longer valid; novel antidiabetic agents may provide adequate glucose control without the risk of hypoglycemia, also offering cardiovascular protection. The same evidence applies to the posttransplant phase, where oral or injectable noninsulin agents should be considered to treat patients to target, limiting the impact of disease on daily living, without interaction with immunosuppressive regimens. The increasing prevalence of liver disease of metabolic origin (nonalcoholic fatty liver) among liver transplant candidates, also having a higher risk of noncirrhotic hepatocellular cancer, is likely to accelerate the acceptance of new drugs and invasive procedures, as suggested by international guidelines. Intensive lifestyle intervention programs remain however mandatory, both before and after transplantation. Achievement of adequate control is mandatory to increase candidacy, to prevent delisting, and to improve long-term outcomes.

The increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) conferred by hepatitis C virus (HCV) is especially relevant after liver transplantation (LT), but its mechanism is still not well defined. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of HCV eradication in inflammatory and endothelial activation markers after LT. We evaluated inflammatory (TNF-alfa, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1) and endothelial activation (E-selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and MMP-9) markers before and after eradication in 45 LT recipients with HCV infection (LT+/HCV+) and 44 non-transplanted HCV-infected patients (LT-/HCV+). We also considered an additional group of 40 LT recipients without HCV infection (LT+/HCV-). LT+/HCV+ patients presented a higher endothelial activation status before eradication compared with LT+/HCV- patients. However, levels of E-selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and MMP-9 were comparable between LT+/HCV+ and LT-/HCV+ patients before eradication. HCV eradication decreased ICAM-1 (5466.55 pg/ml vs. 3354.88 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and VCAM-1 (10456.52 pg/ml vs. 6658.85 pg/ml, P < 0.001) levels in LT+/HCV+ and LT-/HCV+ patients. Remarkably, HCV eradication restored levels of endothelial activation markers of LT+/HCV+ patients compared with that of LT+/HCV- patients. HCV plays a major role in endothelial dysfunction after LT. Furthermore, HCV eradication restores endothelial activation despite the exposure to immunosuppressive therapy.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic pathogen, following solid organ transplantation (SOT), that leads to direct and indirect effects. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CMV exposure at transplantation on the rate of posttransplant thrombotic events (TEs).

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients transplanted at the University of Alberta Hospital between July 2005 and January 2018. We included adult SOT CMV-seronegative recipients at transplantation who received an allograft from either a seropositive donor (D+/R-) or a seronegative donor (D-/R-).

A total of 392 SOT recipients were included: 151 (39%) liver, 188 (48%) kidney, 45 (11%) pancreas, and 8 (2%) other transplants. The mean age was 47 years, 297 (76%) were males, and 181 (46%) had a CMV D+/R- donor. Patients in the CMV D+/R- cohort were slightly older (51 years versus 48 years in the D-/R- cohort; P = .036), while other variables, including cardiovascular risk factors and pretransplant TEs, were not different between groups. Overall, TEs occurred in 35 (19%) patients in the CMV D+/R- group, versus 21 (10%) in the CMV D-/R- group, at 5 years of follow-up (P = .008); the incidence rates per 100 transplant months were 5.12 and 1.02 in the CMV D+/R- and CMV D-/R- groups, respectively (P = .003). After adjusting for potential confounders with a Cox regression model, a CMV D+/R- transplantation was independently associated with an increased risk of a TE over 5 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.027; 95% confidence interval, 1.669-5.488).

A CMV D+/R- transplantation is associated with an increased risk of a TE posttransplantation.

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous Herpesviridae virus with a wide spectrum of pathology in humans. Host immunity is a major determinant of the clinical manifestation of CMV and can vary widely in the gastroenterology and hepatology practice setting. Immunocompetent patients generally develop a benign, self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome whereas gastrointestinal tissue-invasive disease is more frequently seen in immunocompromised and inflammatory bowel disease patients. Additionally, liver allograft dysfunction is a significant consequence of CMV infection in liver transplant patients. While polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry techniques allow for the reliable and accurate detection of CMV in the human host, the diagnostic value of different serologic, endoscopic, and histologic tests depends on a variety of factors. Similarly, latent CMV, CMV infection, and CMV disease carry different significance depending on the patient population, and the decision to initiate antiviral therapy can be complex and patient-specific. This review will focus on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CMV in patient populations relevant to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology-liver transplant recipients, inflammatory bowel disease patients, and otherwise immunocompetent patients.