Cardiogenic shock is the most common cause of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Historically, AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock was associated with in-hospital survival of only ~50%. Recent advances in mechanical circulatory support have allowed for improved survival rates compared with only conventional medical treatment. However, the management strategy for AMI-related cardiogenic shock remains largely empirical due to limited high-quality evidence-based studies. In this review, we provide an overview of the four types of left ventricular mechanical circulatory support currently available, review new guideline updates from the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology, and discuss recent and ongoing studies and registries in cardiogenic shock following AMI.

This study aimed to clarify the effects of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) on skeletal muscle oxygen pressure and function in rats.

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (2-3 months old, n = 17) were randomized into control and VA-ECMO groups. All animals were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. The VA-ECMO circuit was established by cannulating the right jugular vein and left carotid artery. Interstitial PO2 in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle was measured using a phosphorescence quenching technique during electrically induced muscle contractions. Muscle tension was analyzed to evaluate the rate of force development (RFD) and relaxation rate.

Compared to controls, arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) was significantly higher, while hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in the VA-ECMO group (both p < 0.01). Interstitial PO2 was significantly reduced at rest and during contractions in the VA-ECMO group (both p < 0.01). Muscle relaxation was delayed, and peak tension was lower in the VA-ECMO group compared to controls (both p < 0.01).

VA-ECMO impairs skeletal muscle function and reduces interstitial PO2 in contracting muscles, effects that appear independent of hyperoxemia. These findings provide insight into the microcirculatory and functional consequences of VA-ECMO on skeletal muscle.

BackgroundThe use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in patients after surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) has not been well documented.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of ECLS after surgery for ATAAD with data published by October 2023 in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023479955).ResultsTwelve observational studies met our eligibility criteria, including 280 patients. Mean age was 55.0 years and women represented 25.3% of the overall population. Although the mean preoperative left ventricle ejection fraction was 59.8%, 60.8% of patients developed left ventricle failure and 34.0% developed biventricular failure. Coronary involvement and malperfusion were found in 37.1% and 25.6%, respectively. Concomitant coronary bypass surgery was performed in 38.5% of patients. Regarding ECLS, retrograde flow (femoral) was present in 39.9% and central cannulation was present in 35.4%. In-hospital mortality was 62.8% and pooled estimate of successful weaning was 50.8%. Neurological complications, bleeding and renal failure were found in 25.9%, 38.7%, and 65.5%, respectively.ConclusionECLS after surgical repair for ATAAD remains associated with high rates of in-hospital death and complications, but it still represents a chance of survival in critical situations. ECLS remains a salvage attempt and surgeons should not try to avoid ECLS at all costs after repairing an ATAAD case.

Limited data are available on sex differences in clinical outcomes of patients with profound cardiogenic shock (CS) receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Therefore, our study sought to compare clinical pictures and outcomes between male and female patients treated with VA-ECMO.

A total of 1,328 patients receiving VA-ECMO were selected from either the Samsung Medical Center or a multicenter CS registry named the SMART RESCUE study. The study population was divided into men (n=903) and women (n=425). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was procedure-related complications, which included limb ischemia, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) site bleeding and infection, and wound dehiscence.

There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (men vs. women, 46.4% vs. 45.6%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.05; p=0.106) based on multivariable analysis. Women showed higher rates of procedure-related complication than men (18.7% vs. 25.9%; adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.29-2.57; p=0.001) mainly driven by higher incidence of limb ischemia (7.1% vs. 12.9%; adjusted OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.78; p=0.001) On multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex was an independent predictor of procedure-related complications (adjusted OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.13-2.49; p=0.009).

Although no significant difference in either in-hospital or mid-term mortality was found between men and women, female sex is an independent factor for ECMO-related complications.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02985008.

Selecting an appropriate cannula size is crucial for achieving an adequate extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) flow rate. However, the association between ECMO cannula size and the prognosis of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has not been fully elucidated. We examined the associations between ECMO cannula size and neurological outcomes and survival at discharge in patients with OHCA who received ECMO.

This is a secondary analysis of the Study of Advanced life support for Ventricular fibrillation with Extracorporeal circulation in Japan (SAVE-J II study). The primary and secondary outcomes were favorable neurological outcomes and survival at discharge, respectively. In all, 918 patients were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between cannula sizes and neurological outcomes. Multivariable analysis showed that increasing body weight (BW)-adjusted sizes of arterial cannulas (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per 0.01-Fr/kg increase; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07; P=0.011) and venous cannulas (OR 1.04 per 0.01-Fr/kg increase; 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P=0.005) were significantly associated with the survival rate at discharge. Increasing BW-adjusted sizes of arterial cannulas were significantly associated with cannulation site bleeding.

There were no significant associations between favorable neurological outcomes and cannula size, whereas larger-sized arterial and venous cannulas were significantly associated with higher survival rates at discharge in patients with OHCA who received ECMO.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the most common cause of early mortality following heart transplantation. Although PGD can affect both ventricles, isolated right ventricular dysfunction (RV-PGD) is observed in nearly half of PGD patients. RV-PGD requires specific medical management to support the preload, afterload, and function of the failing RV; however, the use of mechanical circulatory support of the RV (RV-MCS) might be required when optimal medical therapy is insufficient in preventing forward failure and retrograde venous congestion. While RV-MCS options provide the opportunity to prevent or to recover from circulatory shock states, MCS is associated with a significant risk of complications. As a result of recent developments in short-term mechanical support devices, less invasive, percutaneous options for RV-MCS are available. In this review, we discuss the available devices, their advantages and disadvantages, and reported outcomes in RV-PGD.

To assess the capability of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS), and Survival After VA-ECMO (SAVE) in predicting outcomes among a cohort of patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

This is an observational retrospective study of 142 patients admitted to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) after undergoing VA-ECMO insertion.

CTICU of a tertiary care center.

All patients admitted to the CTICU for a minimum of 24 hours, post-VA-ECMO insertion, between 2015 and 2022.

Review of electronic patient records.

Scores for APACHE-II, SOFA, and CASUS were calculated 24 hours after intensive care units (ICU) admission. The SAVE score was computed from the last available patient details within 24 hours of ECMO insertion. Relevant demographic, clinical, and laboratory data for the study was retrieved from electronic patient records. Pre-ECMO serum levels of lactates and creatinine were significantly associated with mortality. Lower ECMO flow rates at 4 and 12 hours post-ECMO cannulation were significantly correlated with survival to discharge. The development of arrhythmias, acute kidney injury, and the need for continuous renal replacement therapy while on ECMO were significantly associated with mortality. The APACHE-II, SOFA, and CASUS scores, calculated at 24 hours of ICU admission, were significantly higher amongst nonsurvivors. Following risk score categorization using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, it was found that APACHE-II, SOFA, and CASUS scores calculated 24 hours post-ICU admission after ECMO insertion demonstrated moderate predictive ability for mortality. In contrast, the SAVE score failed to predict mortality. APACHE-II >27 (area under the curve = 0.66), calculated 24 hours post-ICU admission after ECMO insertion, showed the greatest predictive ability for mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the four scores showed that APACHE-II >27 and SOFA >14, calculated 24 hours post-ICU admission after ECMO insertion, were independently significantly predictive of mortality.

The APACHE-II, SOFA, and CASUS, calculated at 24 hours of ICU admission, were significantly higher among nonsurvivors compared with survivors. The APACHE-II demonstrated the highest mortality predictive ability. APACHE-II scores of 27 or above and SOFA scores of 14 or above at 24 hours of ICU admission after ECMO cannulation can predict mortality and assist physicians in decision-making.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening medical condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment. The use of standardized CS criteria, such as the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions criteria, can categorize patients and guide therapeutic strategies. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become valuable tools in the treatment of CS, as they can provide cardiovascular support as a bridge to recovery, cardiac surgery, or advanced therapies such as cardiac transplant or durable ventricular assist devices. The use of MCS should be tailored to each individual patient, focused on a stepwise escalation of circulatory support to support both end-organ perfusion and myocardial recovery. As newer MCS devices reduce myocardial oxygen demand without increasing ischemia, the possibility of recovery is optimized. In this review, we discuss the different modalities of MCS focusing on the mechanism of support and the advantages and disadvantages of each device.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is applied for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. Concomitant left ventricular unloading (LVU) with a microaxial flow pump (mAFP) enables myocardial and pulmonary recovery and may overcome some of the limitations of VA-ECMO. The study included 145 cardiogenic shock patients, 89 (61.4%) of whom were treated with VA-ECMO alone (ECMO group), whereas 56 (38.6%) received LVU with a surgically implanted mAFP on top of VA-ECMO (ECMELLA group). After 2:1 propensity score matching, 30 day and 1 year survival was similar between the groups ( p = 0.62 and 0.68, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, patients who received mAFP in the first 2 hours after VA-ECMO implantation had an improved 30 day (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.45 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.23-0.88], p = 0.02) and 1 year survival (HR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.28-0.97], p = 0.04). The rate of limb ischemia, hemorrhage, and renal replacement therapy were comparable between the propensity score-matched cohorts. Early LVU with a surgically implanted mAFP in patients on VA-ECMO improved short-and long-term survival.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a highly complex clinical condition that requires a management strategy focused on early resolution of the underlying cause and the provision of circulatory support. In cases of refractory CS, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is employed to replace the failed cardiocirculatory system, thereby preventing the development of multiorgan failure. There are various types of MCS, and patients with CS typically require devices that are either short-term (< 15 days) or intermediate-term (15-30 days). When choosing the device the underlying cause of CS, as well as the presence or absence of concomitant conditions such as failed ventricle, respiratory failure, and the intended purpose of the support should be taken into consideration. Patients with MCS require the comprehensive care indicated in complex critically ill patients with multiorgan dysfunction, with an emphasis on device monitoring and control. Different complications may arise during support management, and its withdrawal must be protocolized.

This study evaluated how well serial pulse pressure (PP) and PP adjusted by the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) predicted venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) weaning success and clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) patients.

A total of 213 patients with AMI-CS who received VA-ECMO between January 2010 and August 2021 were enrolled in the institutional ECMO registry. Serial PP and VIS were measured immediately, 12, 24, and 48 h after VA-ECMO insertion. PP adjusted by VIS was defined as PP/√VIS. The primary outcome was successful VA-ECMO weaning. Successful weaning from VA-ECMO was observed in 151 patients (70.9%). Immediately after VA-ECMO insertion, PP [successful vs. failed weaning, 26.0 (15.5-46.0) vs. 21.0 (12.5-33.0), P = 0.386] and PP/√VIS [11.1 (5.1-25.0) vs. 6.0 (3.1-14.2), P = 0.118] did not differ between the successful and failed weaning groups. Serial PP and PP adjusted by VIS at 12, 24, and 48 h after VA-ECMO insertion were significantly higher in patients with successful weaning than those with failed weaning [successful vs. failed weaning, 24.0 (4.0-38.0) vs. 12.5 (6.0-25.5), P = 0.007 for 12 h PP, and 10.1 (5.7-22.0) vs. 2.9 (1.7-5.9), P < 0.001 for 12 h PP/√VIS]. The 12 h PP/√VIS showed better discriminative function for successful weaning than 12 h PP alone [area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.88, P < 0.001 vs. AUC 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.77, P = 0.002]. Patients with a low 12 h PP/√VIS (≤7) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (44.4% vs. 19.8%, P < 0.001) and 6 month follow-up mortality (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% CI 1.49-3.90, P < 0.001) than those with a high 12 h PP/√VIS (>7).

PP adjusted by VIS taken 12 h following VA-ECMO initiation can predict weaning from VA-ECMO more successfully than PP alone, and its low value was associated with a higher risk of mortality in AMI-CS patients.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) has emerged as an effective rescue therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to standard treatment protocols, and its use has been rising worldwide in the last decade. Although experience and availability are growing, outcomes remain poor. There is need for evidence to improve clinical practice and outcomes.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who were supported with VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock at our institution between January 2015 and January 2023. The study purpose was to compare outcomes between patients who were supported with central versus peripheral configuration.

ECMO was applied in 108 patients, 48 (44%) of whom received central configuration and 60 (56%) peripheral. Patients supported with central VA ECMO were more likely to be supported for post-cardiotomy shock (odds ratio [OR] 4.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.03-10.41]), while patients in the peripheral group were predominantly treated for chronic heart failure decompensation (OR 9.4 [95% CI 1.16-76.3]). Central VA ECMO had lower survival rates during ECMO support (29.2% versus 51.7%, p = 0.018) and at discharge (8% versus 37%, p = 0.001). These patients were at high risk of complications, such as acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 2.37 [95% CI 1.06-5.3], p = 0.034) and major bleeding (OR 3.08 [95% CI 1.36-6.94], p < 0.001).

Patients on central VA ECMO were supported mainly for post-cardiotomy shock, presented with more complications such as major bleeding and AKI, and had worse survival to hospital discharge compared with patients on peripheral VA ECMO. Patient selection, timing of implementation, cannulation strategy, and configuration remain the main determinants of clinical outcome.

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery experience significant physiologic derangements that place them at risk for multiple shock phenotypes. Any combination of cardiogenic, obstructive, hemorrhagic, or vasoplegic shock occurs commonly in post-cardiotomy patients. The approach to the diagnosis and management of these shock states has many facets that are distinct compared to non-surgical cardiac intensive care unit patients. Additionally, the approach to and associated outcomes of cardiac arrest in the post-cardiotomy population are uniquely characterized by emergent bedside resternotomy if the circulation is not immediately restored. This review focuses on the unique aspects of the diagnosis and management of post-cardiotomy shock.

Discussing the rationale and current evidence for left ventricular unloading in cardiogenic shock.

Microaxial flow pumps (MFP) and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) augment cardiac output while simultaneously unloading the left ventricle (e.g. reducing left ventricular pressure), thereby targeting a key mechanism of cardiogenic shock. A recent randomized trial has shown a mortality reduction with MFP in selected patients with cardiogenic shock, strengthening the rationale for this strategy, although the evidence for the IABP is so far neutral. MFP/IABP can also be used concomitantly with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) to alleviate the va-ECMO-related increase in left ventricular afterload, to facilitate weaning and ultimately to improve myocardial recovery and prognosis of affected patients. However, the use of MFP/IABP in this indication solely relies on retrospective data, which need to be interpreted with caution, especially as these strategies are associated with more complications. Currently ongoing randomized trials will help to further clarify the role of left ventricular unloading in patients on va-ECMO.

Left ventricular unloading addresses a key mechanism of cardiogenic shock, with strong evidence to support MFP use in selected patients, but further randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the role of different devices/strategies for the overall shock population.

Acute heart failure (HF) presents a significant mortality burden, necessitating continuous therapeutic advancements. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is crucial in managing cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to acute HF, serving as a bridge to recovery or durable support. Currently, MCS options include the Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP), TandemHeart (TH), Impella, and Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO), each offering unique benefits and risks tailored to patient-specific factors and clinical scenarios. This review examines the clinical implications of recent advancements in temporary MCS, identifies knowledge gaps, and explores promising avenues for future research and clinical application. Understanding each device's unique attributes is crucial for their efficient implementation in various clinical scenarios, ultimately advancing towards intelligent, personalized support strategies.

Patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support are at a high risk of hemorrhagic complications, including upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and impact of this complication in V-A ECMO patients.

A retrospective single-center study (2013-2017) was conducted on V-A ECMO patients, excluding those who died within 24 h. All patients with suspected UGIB underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and were analyzed and compared to the remainder of the cohort, from the initiation of ECMO until 5 days after explantation.

A total of 150 V-A ECMO cases (65 after cardiac surgery and 85 due to medical etiology) were included. 90% of the patients received prophylactic proton pump inhibitor therapy and enteral nutrition. Thirty-one patients underwent EGD for suspected UGIB, with 16 confirmed cases of UGIB. The incidence was 10.7%, with a median occurrence at 10 [7-17] days. There were no significant differences in clinical or biological characteristics on the day of EGD. However, patients with UGIB had significant increases in packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma needs, mechanical ventilation duration and V-A ECMO duration, as well as in length of intensive care unit and hospital stays. There was no significant difference in mortality. The only independent risk factor of UGIB was a history of peptic ulcer (OR = 7.32; 95% CI [1.07-50.01], p = 0.042).

UGIB occurred in at least 1 out of 10 cases of V-A ECMO patients, with significant consequences on healthcare resources. Enteral nutrition and proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis did not appear to protect V-A ECMO patients. Further studies should assess their real benefits in these patients with high risk of hemorrhage.

Differences in outcomes by indication for venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) are poorly described. We hypothesized that patients on VA-ECLS for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have fewer complications and better survival than patients on VA-ECLS for other indications.

All patients ≥18 years on VA-ECLS from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization global registry (2010-2019) were evaluated (n = 29,842). After excluding patients aged >79 years (n = 729) and those with incomplete indication data (n = 2530), patients were stratified by VA-ECLS indication for PE vs all other indications. The association between being discharged alive and each type of complication with VA-ECLS indication was assessed.

Of 26,583 patients included in the analysis, 978 (3.7%) were on VA-ECLS for a primary diagnosis of acute PE. Acute PE patients were younger (53.1 vs 56.7 years, P < .001) and were more likely to be women (52.1% vs 32.3%, P < .001). Patients who underwent VA-ECLS for acute PE were 78% more likely to be discharged alive vs patients supported with VA-ECLS for other reasons (52.8% vs 40.4%; P < .001). Acute PE patients had fewer cardiovascular and renal complications (26.6% vs 38.0% and 31.1% vs 39.4%, respectively; adjusted P < .001). Acute PE patients had higher odds of having clots and mechanical complications (8.7% vs 7.9% and 16.7% vs 14.6%, respectively; adjusted P < .001).

Patients undergoing VA-ECLS for acute PE have higher odds of survival to hospital discharge compared with those supported for other indications. Additionally, VA-ECLS in this population is associated with fewer cardiovascular and renal complications but higher mechanical complications.

Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock excluding Impella and IABP use. Method: The large Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to study any association between the use of ECMO in adults over the age of 18 and mortality and complications with a diagnosis of cardiogenic shocks. Results: ICD-10 codes for ECMO and cardiogenic shock for the available years 2016-2020 were utilized. A total of 796,585 (age 66.5 ± 14.4) patients had a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock excluding Impella. Of these patients, 13,160 (age 53.7 ± 15.4) were treated with ECMO without IABP use. Total inpatient mortality without any device was 32.7%. It was 47.9% with ECMO. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for 47 variables such as age, gender, race, lactic acidosis, three-vessel intervention, left main myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, systolic heart failure, acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, chronic renal disease, etc., ECMO utilization remained highly associated with mortality (OR: 1.78, CI: 1.6-1.9, p < 0.001). Evaluating teaching hospitals only revealed similar findings. Major complications were also high in the ECMO cohort. Conclusions: In patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of ECMO was associated with the high in-hospital mortality regardless of comorbid condition, high-risk futures, or type of hospital.

Critical illness creates challenges for healthcare providers in determining the optimal treatment of severe disease, particularly in determining the most appropriate selection and dosing of medications. Critically ill patients experience endogenous physiologic changes that alter the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of medications. These alterations can be further compounded by mechanical support modalities such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Specific components of the ECMO circuit have the potential to affect drug PKs through drug sequestration and an increase in the volume of distribution. Factors related to the medications themselves also play a role. These PK alterations create problems when trying to properly utilize antimicrobials in this patient population. The literature seeking to identify appropriate antimicrobial dosing regimens is both limited and difficult to evaluate due to patient variability and an inability to determine the exact role of the ECMO circuit in reduced drug concentrations. Lipophilic and highly protein bound medications are considered more likely to undergo significant drug sequestration in an ECMO circuit, and this general trend represents a logical starting point in antimicrobial selection and dosing in patients on ECMO support. This should not be the only consideration, however, as identifying infection and evaluating the efficacy of treatments in this population is challenging. Due to these challenges, therapeutic drug monitoring should be utilized whenever possible, particularly in cases with severe infection or high concern for drug toxicity.

Methods for risk stratification of candidates for heart transplantation (HTx) supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are limited. We evaluated the reliability of the APACHE IV score to identify the risk of mortality in this patient subset in a multicenter study.

Between January 2010 and December 2022, 167 consecutive ECMO patients were bridged to HTx; they were divided into two groups, according to a cutoff value of APACHE IV score, obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for 90-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and compared through the log-Rank test. Cox regression model was used to estimate which factors were associated with survival.

The 90-day mortality prediction of the APACHE IV score showed an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), with a cutoff value of 49 (specificity 91.7%-sensibility 69.6%). 125 patients (74.8%) showed an APACHE IV score value < 49 (Group A), and 42 (25.2%) ≥ 49 (Group B). 90-day mortality was 11.2% in Group A and 76.2% in Group B (p < 0.01). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 85.5%, 77% versus 23.4%, 23.4% (p < 0.01) in Groups A and B. Mortality correlated at univariable analysis with recipient age, body mass index, mechanical ventilation, APACHE IV score, and platelets number. At multivariable analysis only APACHE IV score (HR: 1.07 [1.05-1.09, 95% CI]) independently affected survival.

The APACHE IV score represents a powerful predictor of survival in patients bridged to HTx on ECMO support, and could guide candidacy of patients on ECMO.

Refractory vasodilatory shock, or vasoplegia, is a pathophysiologic state observed in the intensive care unit and operating room in patients with a variety of primary diagnoses. Definitions of vasoplegia vary by source but are qualitatively defined clinically as a normal or high cardiac index and low systemic vascular resistance causing hypotension despite high-dose vasopressors in the setting of euvolemia. This definition can be difficult to apply to patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS). A large body of mostly retrospective literature exists on vasoplegia in the non-MCS population, but the increased use of temporary MCS justifies an examination of vasoplegia in this population. MCS, particularly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, adds complexity to the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia due to challenges in determining cardiac output (or total blood flow), lack of clarity on appropriate dosing of noncatecholamine interventions, increased thrombosis risk, the difficulty in determining the endpoints of adequate volume resuscitation, and the unclear effects of rescue agents (methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, and angiotensin II) on MCS device monitoring and function. Care teams must combine data from invasive and noninvasive sources to diagnose vasoplegia in this population. In this narrative review, the available literature is surveyed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia in the temporary MCS population, with a focus on noncatecholamine treatments and special considerations for patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, transvalvular heart pumps, and other ventricular assist devices.

The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a direct bridge to heart transplantation (BTT) is not common in adults worldwide. BTT with ECMO is associated with increased early/mid-term mortality compared with other interventions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where no other type of short-term mechanical circulatory support is available, its use is widespread and increasingly used as rescue therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) as a direct bridge to heart transplantation (HT).

To assess the outcomes of adult patients using VA-ECMO as a direct BTT in an LMIC and compare them with international registries.

We conducted a single-center study analyzing consecutive adult patients requiring VA-ECMO as BTT due to refractory CS or cardiac arrest (CA) in a cardiovascular center in Argentina between January 2014 and December 2022. Survival and adverse clinical events after VA-ECMO implantation were evaluated.

Of 86 VA-ECMO, 22 (25.5%) were implanted as initial BTT strategy, and 52.1% of them underwent HT. Mean age was 46 years (SD 12); 59% were male. ECMO was indicated in 81% for CS, and the most common underlying condition was coronary artery disease (31.8%). Overall, in-hospital mortality for VA-ECMO as BTT was 50%. Survival to discharge was 83% in those who underwent HT and 10% in those who did not, p < .001. In those who did not undergo HT, the main cause of death was hemorrhagic complications (44%), followed by thrombotic complications (33%). The median duration of VA-ECMO was 6 days (IQR 3-16). There were no differences in the number of days on ECMO between those who received a transplant and those who did not. In the Spanish registry, in-hospital survival after HT was 66.7%; the United Network of Organ Sharing registry estimated post-transplant survival at 73.1% ± 4.4%, and in the French national registry 1-year posttransplant survival was 70% in the VA-ECMO group.

In adult patients with cardiogenic shock, VA-ECMO as a direct BTT allowed successful HT in half of the patients. HT provided a survival benefit in listed patients on VA-ECMO. We present a single center experience with results comparable to those of international registries.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a time-sensitive and hemodynamically complex syndrome with a broad spectrum of etiologies and clinical presentations. Despite contemporary therapies, CS continues to maintain high morbidity and mortality ranging from 35 to 50%. More recently, burgeoning observational research in this field aimed at enhancing the early recognition and characterization of the shock state through standardized team-based protocols, comprehensive hemodynamic profiling, and tailored and selective utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices has been associated with improved outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of CS, novel phenotypes, evolving definitions and staging systems, currently available pharmacologic and device-based therapies, standardized, team-based management protocols, and regionalized systems-of-care aimed at improving shock outcomes. We also explore opportunities for fertile investigation through randomized and non-randomized studies to address the prevailing knowledge gaps that will be critical to improving long-term outcomes.

Mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) and obstruction are rare and dangerous events often related to inappropriate anticoagulant therapy. High mortality rates occur because of delayed diagnosis, hemodynamic instability, multiple organ failure (MOF), and high perioperative risk. Surgical repair is a first-line treatment for obstructive PVT with hemodynamic instability but is often not readily available or safely performed. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support has been increasingly used in patients with PVT and cardiorespiratory collapse, allowing MOF reversal and safer deferred surgery. The authors present a case of a young female with refractory cardiogenic shock secondary to mitral PVT successfully managed with VA ECMO. Furthermore, the promising role of perioperative VA ECMO support for PVT-related cardiogenic shock is also discussed.

Clinical outcome of ischemic cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is highly variable, necessitating appropriate assessment of prognosis. However, a systemic predictive model estimating the mortality of refractory ischemic CS is lacking. The PRECISE (Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality for Patients With Refractory Ischemic Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support) score was developed to predict the prognosis of refractory ischemic CS due to acute myocardial infarction.

Data were obtained from the multicenter CS registry RESCUE (Retrospective and Prospective Observational Study to Investigate Clinical Outcomes and Efficacy of Left Ventricular Assist Device for Korean Patients With Cardiogenic Shock) that consists of 322 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by refractory ischemic CS requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Fifteen parameters were selected to assess in-hospital mortality. The developed model was validated internally and externally using an independent external cohort (n=138). Among 322 patients, 138 (42.9%) survived postdischarge. Fifteen predictors were included for model development: age, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, peak lactic acid, serum creatinine, lowest left ventricular ejection fraction, vasoactive inotropic score, shock to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation insertion time, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, continuous renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilator, successful coronary revascularization, and staged percutaneous coronary intervention. The PRECISE score yielded a high area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (0.894 [95% CI, 0.860-0.927]). External validation and calibration resulted in competent sensitivity (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.895 [95% CI, 0.853-0.930]).

The PRECISE score demonstrated high predictive performance and directly translates into the expected in-hospital mortality rate. The PRECISE score may be used to support clinical decision-making in ischemic CS (www.theprecisescore.com).

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02985008.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) can be used to support severely ill patients with cardiogenic shock. While age is commonly used in patient selection, little is known regarding its association with outcomes in this population. We sought to evaluate the association between increasing age and outcomes following V-A ECMO.

We used individual-level patient data from 440 centers in the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. We included all adult patients receiving V-A ECMO from 2017 to 2019. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included a composite of complications following initiation of V-A ECMO. We conducted Bayesian analyses of the relationship between increasing age and outcomes of interest.

We included 15,172 patients receiving V-A ECMO. Of these, 8172 (53.9%) died in hospital. For the analysis conducted using weakly informed priors, and as compared to the reference category of age 18-29, the age bracket of 30-39 (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.79-1.10) was not associated with hospital mortality, but age brackets 40-49 (odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% CrI: 1.08-1.47), 50-59 (OR 1.78, 95% CrI: 1.55-2.06), 60-69 (OR 2.24, 95% CrI: 1.94-2.59), 70-79 (OR 2.90, 95% CrI: 2.49-3.39) and ≥ 80 (OR 4.02, 95% CrI: 3.13-5.20) were independently associated with increasing hospital mortality. Similar results were found in the analysis conducted with an informative prior, as well as between increasing age and post-ECMO complications.

Among patients receiving V-A ECMO for cardiogenic shock, increasing age is strongly associated with increasing odds of death and complications, and this association emerges as early as 40 years of age.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients have a high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) patients are more likely to develop AKI than ECMO patients because of serious injury during cardiac arrest (CA).

This study aims to assess the occurrence and outcomes of AKI in ECPR and ECMO, and to identify specific risk factors and clinical implications of AKI in ECPR.

This is a retrospective observational study from a single tertiary care hospital in Gwangju, Korea. Adults (≥18 years) who received ECMO with cardiac etiology in the emergency and inpatient departments from January 2015 to December 2021 were included. The patients (n = 169) were divided into two groups, ECPR and ECMO without CA, and the occurrence of AKI was investigated. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were six-month cerebral performance category (CPC) and AKI during hospitalization.

The incidence of AKI was significantly higher with ECPR (67.5 %) than with ECMO without CA (38.4 %). ECPR was statistically significant for Expire (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.45, 95 % CI 1.28-4.66) and Poor CPC (2.59, 1.32-5.09). AKI was also statistically significant for Expire (6.69, 3.37-13.29) and Poor CPC (5.45, 2.73-10.88). AKI was the determining factor for the outcomes of ECPR (p = 0.01).

ECPR patients are more likely to develop AKI than ECMO without CA patients. In ECPR patients, AKI leads to poor outcomes. Therefore, clinicians should be careful not to develop AKI in ECPR patients.

There are minimal data on the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane life support (VA-ECLS) in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS). This study sought to describe the population of ACHD patients with CS who received VA-ECLS in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry. This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with diagnoses of ACHD and CS in ELSO from 2009-2021. Anatomic complexity was categorized using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2018 guidelines. We described patient characteristics, complications, and outcomes, as well as trends in mortality and VA-ECLS utilization. Of 528 patients who met inclusion criteria, there were 32 patients with high-complexity anatomy, 196 with moderate-complexity anatomy, and 300 with low-complexity anatomy. The median age was 59.6 years (interquartile range, 45.8-68.2). The number of VA-ECLS implants increased from five implants in 2010 to 81 implants in 2021. Overall mortality was 58.3% and decreased year-by-year (β= -2.03 [95% confidence interval, -3.36 to -0.70], p = 0.007). Six patients (1.1%) were bridged to heart transplantation and 21 (4.0%) to durable ventricular assist device. Complications included cardiac arrhythmia/tamponade (21.6%), surgical site bleeding (17.6%), cannula site bleeding (11.4%), limb ischemia (7.4%), and stroke (8.7%). Utilization of VA-ECLS for CS in ACHD patients has increased over time with a trend toward improvement in survival to discharge.

Pulmonary complications often occur in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). However, the prognostic impact of lung damage has not been fully elucidated.

This single-center retrospective observational study targeted patients with cardiogenic shock who received VA ECMO between 2012 and 2021. This study included 65 patients who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) on VA ECMO, followed by escalation to central mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with left ventricular venting. The average density of lung CT images was measured using region-of-interest methods, and the primary endpoint was 180-day all-cause death after escalation to the central MCS.

Twenty-two patients (34%) developed 180-day all-cause death. According to the Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.14; p = 0.001), ischemic etiology (HR, 5.53; 95% CI, 2.09-14.62; p < 0.001), duration of VA ECMO support (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00-1.40; p = 0.045), and lung CT density (≥ -481 Hounsfield unit [HU]) (HR, 6.33; 95% CI, 2.26-17.72; p < 0.001) were independently associated with all-cause death. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined that lung CT density ≥ -481 HU is an optimal cutoff value for predicting all-cause death (area under the curve [AUC], 0.72). The 180-day overall survival rate for patients with high lung CT density (≥ -481 HU) was significantly lower than that for those with low lung CT density (< -481 HU) (44.4% vs. 81.6%, respectively, p = 0.002).

Higher lung CT density could be a useful predictor of death in patients with VA ECMO requiring central MCS escalation.

Limited knowledge exists regarding the predictors of mortality after successful weaning of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We aimed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after successful weaning from ECMO. Data were obtained from a multicenter registry of CS. Successful ECMO weaning was defined as survival with minimal mean arterial pressure (> 65 mmHg) for > 24 h after ECMO removal. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality after successful ECMO weaning. Among 1247 patients with CS, 485 received ECMO, and 262 were successfully weaned from ECMO. In-hospital mortality occurred in 48 patients (18.3%). Survivors at discharge differed significantly from non-survivors in age, cardiovascular comorbidities, cause of CS, left ventricular ejection fraction, and use of adjunctive therapy. Five independent predictors for in-hospital mortality were identified: use of continuous renal replacement therapy (odds ratio 5.429, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.468-11.940; p < 0.001), use of intra-aortic balloon pump (3.204, 1.105-9.287; p = 0.032), diabetes mellitus (3.152, 1.414-7.023; p = 0.005), age (1.050, 1.016-1.084; p = 0.003), and left ventricular ejection fraction after ECMO insertion (0.957, 0.927-0.987; p = 0.006). Even after successful weaning of ECMO, patients with irreversible risk factors should be recognized, and careful monitoring should be done for sign of deconditioning.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between blood lactate level and mortality in pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe cardiopulmonary failure.

A retrospective observational study was conducted on pediatric patients who received ECMO from January 2013 to December 2021 at the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital. Patient demographic characteristics, arterial blood lactate level prior to ECMO (pre-ECMO), ECMO settings, ECMO duration, and 30-days mortality were retrieved from patients' medical records. The relationships between pre-ECMO blood lactate level and mortality were interpreted using the logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

A total of 160 pediatric patients who had either refractory respiratory failure (n = 89) or circulatory failure (n = 71) and received ECMO were included in this study. In both the respiratory failure and circulatory failure groups, the non-survivors showed a higher mean pre-ECMO arterial blood lactate level than the survivors. In the respiratory failure group, a pre-ECMO lactate concentration at ≥11.6 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 51% and a specificity of 82% for predicting mortality. In the circulatory failure group, a pre-ECMO lactate concentration at ≥7.2 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 57% for predicting mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that respiratory failure patients with a pre-ECMO lactate level over 11.6 mmol/L or circulatory failure patients with a pre-ECMO lactate level over 7.2 mmol/L had a higher 30-days mortality rate than those with a lower lactate level.

High pre-ECMO arterial blood lactate level serves as an independent risk factor for mortality in pediatric patients who receive ECMO for severe cardiopulmonary failure.

The study explored the clinical efficacy of microcirculation-assisted blood flow adjustment in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

This prospective, pilot, randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2018 to 2021; enrolled patients were randomly assigned to the microcirculation or control group at a 1:1 ratio. Microcirculatory and clinical data were collected within 24 h (T1) and at 24-48 h (T2), 48-72 h (T3), and 72-96 h (T4) after ECMO initiation and were compared between the groups following the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The primary outcome was the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at T2. In addition to ITT analysis, analysis based on the as-treated (AT) principle was performed.

A total of 35 patients were enrolled in this study. At T2, the SOFA score did not significantly differ between the microcirculation and control groups (16 [14.8-17] vs. 16 [12.5-18], P = 0.782). Generalized estimating equation analysis demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in the SOFA score over time in the microcirculation-AT group than in the control-AT group (estimated difference: -0.767, standard error: 0.327, P = 0.019). The lactate level at T2 was significantly lower in the microcirculation-AT group (2.7 [2.0-3.6] vs. 4.1 [3.0-6.6] mmol/L, P = 0.029). No significant difference in the 30-day survival rate was noted between the groups.

This prospective pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of microcirculation-assisted VA-ECMO blood flow adjustment despite no significant clinical benefit for critically ill patients. More efforts in personnel training and newer technologies may help achieve microcirculation optimization.

Cardiogenic shock is a critical condition of low cardiac output resulting in insufficient systemic perfusion and end-organ dysfunction. Though significant advances have been achieved in reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support, cardiogenic shock continues to be a life-threatening condition associated with a high rate of complications and excessively high patient mortality, reported to be between 35% and 50%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can provide full cardiopulmonary support, has been increasingly used in the last two decades, and can be used to restore systemic end-organ hypoperfusion. However, a paucity of randomized controlled trials in combination with high complication and mortality rates suggest the need for more research to better define its efficacy, safety, and optimal patient selection. In this review, we provide an updated review on VA-ECMO, with an emphasis on its application in cardiogenic shock, including indications and contraindications, expected hemodynamic and echocardiographic findings, recommendations for weaning, complications, and outcomes. Furthermore, specific emphasis will be devoted to the two published randomized controlled trials recently presented in this setting.

Impella devices have emerged as a critical tool for temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS) in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to examine the history of the different Impella devices, their hemodynamic profiles, and how the data supports their use.

This review covers the development and specifications of the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0/Left Direct (LD), Impella RP, and Impella 5.5 devices. This review also covers the clinical trials that illuminate the Impella devices' use in their appropriate clinical contexts. These studies examine the effectiveness of Impella devices and have begun to yield promising results, demonstrating improved survival rates when compared to the historically high mortality rates associated with CS. It is important to weigh the benefits of Impella devices in light of their contraindications. A literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed database for reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials pertinent to Impella devices.

Impella devices are a crucial tool for management of patients undergoing high-risk PCI and those with CS. There is evidence that early Impella implantation is beneficial in the treatment of patients presenting with CS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to better elucidate the benefits of Impella devices in various clinical settings.

The Korean Society of Heart Failure (KSHF) Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations based on Korean and international data to guide adequate diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF). Since introduction of 2017 edition of the guidelines, management of advanced HF has considerably improved, especially with advances in mechanical circulatory support and devices. The current guidelines addressed these improvements. In addition, we have included recently updated evidence-based recommendations regarding acute HF in these guidelines. In summary, Part IV of the KSHF Guidelines covers the appropriate diagnosis and optimized management of advanced and acute HF.