Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is emerging as a promising non-invasive intervention for Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet therapeutic outcomes remain inconsistent across studies. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the cognitive benefits of rTMS in AD patients, with a specific focus on stimulation targets and protocols variations.

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for relevant English-language studies published up to 31 May 2024. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Section (ADAS-Cog). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the effects of stimulation targets, protocol variations and population demographics on rTMS efficacy.

Twenty-two studies involving 874 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, rTMS significantly improved cognitive function (SMD = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.14-0.41; p < 0.0001), showing that the efficacy of rTMS varied by stimulation target and protocol. Stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) led to significant cognitive improvement (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = -0.26 to 0.73; p < 0.0001), whereas bilateral DLPFC stimulation showed no significant improvement (SMD = 0.13; 95% CI = -0.40 to 0.66; p = 0.62). Stimulating the parietal lobe or associated regions produced moderate cognitive benefits (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.03-0.55; p = 0.03). Notably, multi-target stimulation over the bilateral DLPFC, parietal lobes, Wernicke's area, and Broca's area also showed substantial cognitive improvement (MD = 2.85; 95% CI = 1.69-4.00; p < 0.00001). Additionally, subgroup analysis based on geographical background revealed greater effects in studies conducted in Asia (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.14-0.65; p < 0.003).

rTMS is an effective intervention for cognitive enhancement in AD, with its efficacy significantly influenced by stimulation target and protocol. Notably, the greater cognitive benefits observed in Asian populations suggest a potential role of genetic and demographic factors that warrant further investigation. These findings contribute to the development of optimized, personalized rTMS protocols for AD treatment.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/recorddashboard, CRD42023434084.

There is no effective treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), and pharmacological treatment of AD in clinical settings is expensive and prolonged, resulting in a huge psychological and economic burden on the patient's family and caregivers and society as a whole, AD is characterized by progressive, worsening cognitive impairment, and there are currently no drugs that can effectively reverse cognitive impairment. However, it is important to intervene early or delay cognitive impairment so that the condition can be delayed and, ultimately, the burden on patients and families can be reduced through maintenance treatment. It may be that non-pharmacological interventions such as cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) can help with cognitive dysfunction.

To provide a better treatment plan for AD patients and delay the deterioration of cognitive function, the effect of CST on cognitive function in AD was studied by Meta-analysis.

Comprehensive search the Chinese and English databases were comprehensively searched by computer. Chinese databases: China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and China Periodicals Full-text Database (CNKI). The collection time limit is from July 21, 2010 to July 21, 2022 randomized controlled trials literature on the effects of CST on cognitive function in patients with AD. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation were performed. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI were used as evaluation criteria to evaluate the cognitive function of CST in AD patients. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were performed on the results. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, and funnel plot symmetry was assessed with Eggr's test.

CST can not improve Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE) scores in AD patients. Meta-analysis of CST on MMSE scores showed that the heterogeneity was P = 0.14, I 2 = 35%. I 2 = 35% < 50%, and the Q test P > 0.1, choose the random effect model to integrate statistics, get SMD = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.42, P > 0.05. Meta-analysis of CST on AD Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale scores showed that the heterogeneity was P = 0.13, I 2 = 36%. I 2 = 36% < 50 choose a fixed effect model to integrate statistics, get SMD = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.40, 0.39, P > 0.05, the difference is not statistically significant. Meta-analysis of CST on the cognitive function indicators of patients showed that the heterogeneity was P = 0.17, I 2 = 31%. I 2 = 31% < 50%, the fixed effect model showed SMD = 0.01, 95%CI: -0.37, 0.38, P > 0.05, the difference was not statistically significant.

CST may not improve the cognitive function of AD patients, not improve the cognitive function of AD patients, not improve the ability of daily living, and not reduce mental behavior can improve the cognitive function of AD patients.

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia, is marked by progressive cognitive decline, affecting memory, language, orientation, and behavior. Pathological hallmarks include extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular tau tangles, which disrupt synaptic function and connectivity. Neural oscillations, the rhythmic synchronization of neuronal activity across frequency bands, are integral to cognitive processes but become dysregulated in AD, contributing to network dysfunction and memory impairments. Targeting these oscillations has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that specific frequency modulations can restore oscillatory balance, improve synaptic plasticity, and reduce amyloid and tau pathology. In animal models, interventions, such as gamma entrainment using sensory stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), have shown efficacy in enhancing memory function and modulating neuroinflammatory responses. Clinical trials have reported promising cognitive improvements with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), particularly when targeting key hubs in memory-related networks, such as the default mode network (DMN) and frontal-parietal network. Moreover, gamma-tACS has been linked to increased cholinergic activity and enhanced network connectivity, which are correlated with improved cognitive outcomes in AD patients. Despite these advancements, challenges remain in optimizing stimulation parameters, individualizing treatment protocols, and understanding long-term effects. Emerging approaches, including transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) and closed-loop adaptive neuromodulation, hold promise for refining therapeutic strategies. Integrating neuromodulation with pharmacological and lifestyle interventions may maximize cognitive benefits. Continued interdisciplinary efforts are essential to refine these approaches and translate them into clinical practice, advancing the potential for neural oscillation-based therapies in AD.

To evaluate and rank the effectiveness of specific non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) in improving the global cognitive function in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to examine the dose-response relationship.

We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, WOS, and CNKI from their inception to 15 February 2023. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcomes using random effects models.

We included 68 studies involving 5053 participants in this meta-analysis. The treatments with the highest cumulative probabilities for improving global cognitive function were transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), followed by physical exercise (PE), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Additionally, cognitive stimulation (CS), cognitive training CT), multidisciplinary program (MD), and reminiscence treatment (RT) also significantly improve the global cognitive function of people with AD. A non-linear dose-response association was observed for tDCS, PE, rTMS, CS, and CT with global cognitive improvement. Notably, no minimal threshold was identified for the beneficial effects of PE on cognition. The estimated minimal doses for clinically relevant changes in cognition were 33 min per week for tDCS, 330 MET-min per week for PE, and 8000 pulses per week for rTMS.

tDCS, PE, and rTMS are the better effective NPTs for enhancing global cognitive function in individuals with AD. Properly dosing these treatments can yield significant clinical benefits. Our findings support the clinical utility of low-dose exercise in improving cognition in people with AD.

We aim to analyze the efficacy and safety of TMS on cognition in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), AD-related dementias, and nondementia conditions with comorbid cognitive impairment.

Systematic review, Meta-Analysis.

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane database, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 1, 2000, to February 9, 2023.

RCTs, open-label, and case series studies reporting cognitive outcomes following TMS intervention were included.

Cognitive and safety outcomes were measured. Cochrane Risk of Bias for RCTs and MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria were used to evaluate study quality. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022326423).

The systematic review included 143 studies (n = 5,800 participants) worldwide, encompassing 94 RCTs, 43 open-label prospective, 3 open-label retrospective, and 3 case series. The meta-analysis included 25 RCTs in MCI and AD. Collectively, these studies provide evidence of improved global and specific cognitive measures with TMS across diagnostic groups. Only 2 studies (among 143) reported 4 adverse events of seizures: 3 were deemed TMS unrelated and another resolved with coil repositioning. Meta-analysis showed large effect sizes on global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination (SMD = 0.80 [0.26, 1.33], p = 0.003), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 0.85 [0.26, 1.44], p = 0.005), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (SMD = -0.96 [-1.32, -0.60], p < 0.001)) in MCI and AD, although with significant heterogeneity.

The reviewed studies provide favorable evidence of improved cognition with TMS across all groups with cognitive impairment. TMS was safe and well tolerated with infrequent serious adverse events.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to lack definitive curative therapies, necessitating an urgent exploration of innovative approaches. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent clinical trials focusing on invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques as potential interventions for AD. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are evaluated for their therapeutic efficacy, safety, and applicability. DBS, though invasive, has shown promising results in mitigating cognitive decline, but concerns over surgical risks and long-term effects persist. On the other hand, non-invasive methods like rTMS, tDCS, and tACS have demonstrated potential in enhancing cognitive performance and delaying disease progression, with minimal side effects, but with varied consistency. The evidence hints towards an individualized, patient-centric approach to brain stimulation, considering factors such as disease stage, genetic traits, and stimulation parameters. The review also highlights emerging technologies and potential future directions, emphasizing the need for larger, multi-center trials to confirm preliminary findings and establish robust clinical guidelines. In conclusion, while brain stimulation techniques present a promising avenue in AD therapy, further research is imperative for more comprehensive understanding and successful clinical implementation. Through this review, we aim to catalyze the scientific discourse and stimulate further investigation into these novel interventions for AD.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation therapy that is primarily used to treat a variety of neuropsychiatric conditions. Recently, previous research reports stated that rTMS have the characteristics of neurorestorative in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the relevant clinical research evidence has not been fully summarized.

This article performed a network meta-analysis of individual participant data from eligible studies searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 31, 2022. The drug treatments involved were acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), anti-amyloid-beta (Aβ), and some new targeted therapeutic drugs.

A total of 15, 548 individuals with AD disease in 57 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that the patients who received rTMS treatment (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-1.07) had a better MMSE score than placebo. Treatment outcome analysis showed that, compared with multiple pharmacological interventions, rTMS acquired the greatest probability rank with the best cognitive improvement in MMSE score [the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) 93.3%] and ADAS-cog score (SUCRA 86.7%). At the same time, rTMS treatment had the lowest rank in the adverse events (SUCRA 24.1%) except for the placebo group (SUCRA 19.1%).

Compared with the current clinical drug treatment, rTMS demonstrated better cognitive function improvement and fewer adverse events in AD patients. Therefore, rTMS shows broad prospects in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, and it is worth being widely popularized in clinic.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive intervention that holds promise for improving cognitive function in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the effectiveness of this therapy and the optimal TMS parameters has not reached a consensus. The purpose of the meta-analysis was to systematically discern the effectiveness of different components of TMS protocols on cognitive improvement in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD.

The meta-analysis was preregistered on Prospero (registration number: CRD42022345482). PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases were used to search, screen and identify eligible studies with the following keywords: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation OR TMS OR theta burst stimulation AND Alzheimer OR Alzheimers OR Alzheimer's OR mild cognitive impairment OR MCI. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of participants with accepted standardized diagnostic criteria were searched by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the influential factors.

A total of 21 studies and 25 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The findings revealed a significant overall cognition improvement of real stimulation compared with sham stimulation (short-term effects: SMD, 0.91; 95% CI 0.44-1.38; P < 0.01; long-lasting effects: SMD, 0.91; 95% CI 0.27-1.55; P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and bilateral cerebellums, as well as moderate frequency stimulation (5 Hz and 10 Hz) on mild and moderate cognitive impairment patients, were more effective than other TMS protocols. However, the additional application of cognitive training showed no significant improvement.

Cognitive improvement effect of TMS was demonstrated in MCI and AD patients in both short-term assessment and long-lasting outcomes, and the efficiency of TMS is affected by the stimulation frequency, stimulation site, and participant characteristics. Further RCTs are needed to validate the findings of our subgroup analysis.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022345482, identifier: CRD42022345482.

After spinal cord transection injury, the inflammatory microenvironment formed at the injury site, and the cascade of effects generated by secondary injury, results in limited regeneration of injured axons and the apoptosis of neurons in the sensorimotor cortex (SMC). It is crucial to reverse these adverse processes for the recovery of voluntary movement. The mechanism of transcranial intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) as a new non-invasive neural regulation paradigm in promoting axonal regeneration and motor function repair was explored by means of a severe spinal cord transection.

Rats underwent spinal cord transection and 2 mm resection of spinal cord at T10 level. Four groups were studied: Normal (no lesion), Control (lesion with no treatment), sham iTBS (lesion and no functional treatment) and experimental, exposed to transcranial iTBS, 72 h after spinal lesion. Each rat received treatment once a day for 5 days a week; behavioral tests were administered one a week. Inflammation, neuronal apoptosis, neuroprotective effects, regeneration and synaptic plasticity after spinal cord injury (SCI) were determined by immunofluorescence staining, western blotting and mRNA sequencing. For each rat, anterograde tracings were acquired from the SMC or the long descending propriospinal neurons and tested for cortical motor evoked potentials (CMEPs). Regeneration of the corticospinal tract (CST) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) nerve fibers were analyzed 10 weeks after SCI.

When compared to the Control group, the iTBS group showed a reduced inflammatory response and reduced levels of neuronal apoptosis in the SMC when tested 2 weeks after treatment. Four weeks after SCI, the neuroimmune microenvironment at the injury site had improved in the iTBS group, and neuroprotective effects were evident, including the promotion of axonal regeneration and synaptic plasticity. After 8 weeks of iTBS treatment, there was a significant increase in CST regeneration in the region rostral to the site of injury. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the number of 5-HT nerve fibers at the center of the injury site and the long descending propriospinal tract (LDPT) fibers in the region caudal to the site of injury. Moreover, CMEPs and hindlimb motor function were significantly improved.

Neuronal activation and neural tracing further verified that iTBS had the potential to provide neuroprotective effects during the early stages of SCI and induce regeneration effects related to the descending motor pathways (CST, 5-HT and LDPT). Furthermore, our results revealed key relationships between neural pathway activation, neuroimmune regulation, neuroprotection and axonal regeneration, as well as the interaction network of key genes.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders among the older population. Sleep disruption and circadian rhythm disorders often develop in AD patients, and many experience sleeping difficulties requiring pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

This review appraised the evidence from clinical studies on various pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for sleep disturbances in AD patients and proposed an algorithm to manage sleep disturbances in this population of patients.

Non-pharmacological interventions are generally preferred as the first-line approach to improve sleep-related symptoms in AD due to their favorable safety profile. However, when non-pharmacological interventions alone are insufficient, a range of pharmacological agents can be considered. Trazodone and melatonin are commonly used as adjunctive therapies, while Z-drugs including zopiclone and zolpidem are specifically employed to treat insomnia in patients with late-onset AD. Furthermore, a newer class of agents known as dual orexin receptor antagonists has emerged and gained approval for improving sleep onset and maintenance in AD patients.

Disruptions of circadian rhythms and sleep cycles are common among neurodegenerative diseases and can occur at multiple levels. Accumulating evidence reveals a bidirectional relationship between disruptions of circadian rhythms and sleep cycles and neurodegenerative diseases. Circadian disruption and sleep disorders aggravate neurodegeneration and neurodegenerative diseases can in turn disrupt circadian rhythms and sleep. Importantly, circadian disruption and various sleep disorders can increase the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, harnessing the circadian biology findings from preclinical and translational research in neurodegenerative diseases is of importance for reducing risk of neurodegeneration and improving symptoms and quality of life of individuals with neurodegenerative disorders via approaches that normalize circadian in the context of precision medicine. In this review, we discuss the implications of circadian disruption and sleep disorders in neurodegenerative diseases by summarizing evidence from both human and animal studies, focusing on the bidirectional links of sleep and circadian rhythms with prevalent forms of neurodegeneration. These findings provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and suggest a promising role of circadian-based interventions.