As the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) therapies in Crohn disease (CD) is spread, the loss-of-response (LOR) to it is increasingly encountered. Discovering a pathological pathway and biomarkers that can predict LOR would assist in the management of patients with CD. In this article, we provide a comprehensive systematic review of studies assessing predictors of immunogenicity and loss-of-response to anti-TNFα drugs in patients with CD.

We performed a systematic review of PubMed to identify citations pertaining to predictors of immunogenicity and loss-of-response to anti-TNFα drugs in patients with CD through April 27, 2024, using a predefined string of keywords. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers.

A total of 18 eligible studies were included in the review. Four major groups of studies were identified: genetic factors, factors linked with colonic inflammation, serum and anthropological markers, and prevention of LOR. Promising predictors of LOR to infliximab or adalimumab include the carriage of HLA-DQA1*05, visceral adiposity, intestinal abundant presence of CD96, IL-17, and IL-23. Substantial heterogeneity was observed, and none of the markers had undergone formal validation. Specific limitations to acceptance of these factors included failure to use a standardized definition of LOR to anti-TNFα treatment, lack of specificity, and insufficient relevance to the pathogenesis of LOR.

This review underlines the lack of well-defined studies and controlled trials investigating predictors of LOR to anti-TNFα therapies in CD. A research priority is the development of reliable and accurate biomarkers that can shed light on the pathogenesis of the implied LOR. These biomarkers, along with genetic factors, have the potential to enhance clinical management by aiding in patient stratification and monitoring.

This study investigated the feasibility of adalimumab (ADA) dose reduction and withdrawal strategy in children with stable pediatric non-infectious uveitis (PNIU).

This open-label prospective pilot trial recruited 18 stable PNIU patients (33 eyes) between two and eighteen years old who were treated with standard doses of ADA (20/40 mg every 2 weeks) plus oral methotrexate. The interval of ADA injection was extended to 4 weeks and followed up for 24 weeks. If the uveitis remained stable, ADA was discontinued and followed up for another 24 weeks. ADA was considered successfully stopped if no relapse occurred during this period. The relapse-free survival rate, best corrected visual acuity (BVCA), anterior chamber cell (ACC), vitritis, macular thickness (MT), and serum ADA levels were evaluated. Approval Number: 2021KYPJ201. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05155592.

The relapse-free survival rate was 22.2% (4/18) at 48 weeks. 33.3% (6/18) of patients relapsed when ADA was given every 4 weeks, while 44.5% of patients (8/18) relapsed after ADA was stopped. The four patients successfully withdrawn from ADA were all diagnosed with BD. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in BCVA and MT between baseline and final follow-up. The proportion of ACC and vitritis exhibited an upward trend (p < 0.05) during follow-up. Serum ADA gradually decreased to zero during follow-up in both non-recurrence and recurrence groups.

In PNIU children who reached remission for 6 months, ADA dose reduction and withdrawal were associated with a high risk of inflammation recurrence. Timely adjustment of ADA to the last effective dosage frequency can regain control of the inflammation. Detection of ADA serum levels in patients with recurrence may help find the appropriate interval of ADA use.

In ulcerative colitis (UC), anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents often are first-line biologic therapy. Switching to a biologic with a different mode of action (ustekinumab and vedolizumab) or cycling to another anti-TNF agent (adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab) is necessary if an initial anti-TNF fails. This study compared real-world persistence in patients with UC who switched to a biologic with a different mode of action or cycled with another anti-TNF after nonresponse to an anti-TNF.

Adults with UC treated with an anti-TNF, who switched or cycled (index date) between October 21, 2019, and March 02, 2022, were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database. Patients had ≥12 months of continuous insurance eligibility before the first anti-TNF without UC-indicated biologics or advanced therapies. During the 12 months before the index date (baseline period), patients had no other immune disorders and discontinued the first anti-TNF. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weights. Persistence on the index biologic was defined as no therapy exposure gaps >120 days (ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and infliximab) or >60 days (adalimumab and golimumab) between days of supply. Composite end points were persistence while corticosteroid-free (<14 consecutive days of corticosteroid supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/nonindex biologics/advanced therapies). End points were assessed with weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models 12 months after the maintenance phase started.

The switch cohort included 488 patients (mean age: 41.4 years; 44.9% female), and the cycle cohort included 129 patients (mean age: 40.7 years; 43.8% female). At 12 months after the maintenance phase started, the proportions of persistent patients (switch cohort: 79.6%; cycle cohort: 64.9%) and persistent patients on monotherapy (switch cohort: 74.6%; cycle cohort: 48.0%) were significantly higher in the switch versus cycle cohort; the proportions of persistent patients while corticosteroid-free was also higher in the switch (60.1%) versus cycle cohort (49.3%) but was not significant. In the switch cohort, the rate of persistence was 1.92 times higher (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.31-2.82), the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 2.56 times higher (HR = 2.56; 95% CI, 1.86-3.53), and the rate of persistence and being corticosteroid-free was 1.31 times higher (HR = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.98-1.77) than in the cycle cohort.

Patients with UC who switched from an anti-TNF agent to a biologic with a different mode of action were more persistent on treatment than patients who cycled to another anti-TNF agent. Findings may aid physicians whose patients experience treatment failure on the first anti-TNF agent.

Background/Objectives: Tumor necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNFs) have been shown to be an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Several factors are associated with anti-TNF treatment failure. This study aims to explore the impact of age on serum concentrations of anti-TNF drugs and antidrug antibodies (ADAbs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients' charts from July 2018 until September 2024 across seven medical centers. Patients with an established diagnosis of IBD receiving infliximab or adalimumab were included. The primary outcome of this study was the effect of age on the anti-TNFs serum drug concentration and ADAb levels. Linear regression was performed to explore the relationship between age and serum anti-TNF drug and ADAb levels. Results: 1093 patients were included in our cohort. In patients receiving infliximab, there was a significant association between older age and increasing ADAbs levels (p = 0.036), whereas in patients treated with adalimumab, there was no significant relationship between older age and ADAb levels (p = 0.771). There was no significant relationship between age and adalimumab serum concentration (p = 0.54). When stratified by age, patients taking infliximab who were >30 years of age developed more ADAbs compared to those aged ≤30 (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Patients older than 30 years of age receiving infliximab monotherapy have higher ADAbs and lower serum drug concentrations than younger patients. There was no statistically significant difference in ADAbs and serum drug concentrations among patients receiving infliximab combination therapy or adalimumab monotherapy.

Monitoring of therapeutic antibody adalimumab (ADL) and of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) in autoimmune diseases patients' sera has achieved increased attention since several studies showed a correlation between AAA levels and treatment failure. We evaluated a new surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based method that, with slight changes in the analysis condition and in the ligand immobilized on the chip surface, allows to monitor both AAA and ADL. This new label-free method does not require sample pretreatments, and it is fully automated, only requiring the preparation of the chip, which can be used for multiple analysis, and the preparation of the sample sets.

Sera from ADL-treated patients (n = 47) and controls (n = 13) were included in this study. Quantitative analysis of AAA and ADL were performed separately using a new SPR-biosensor, and a commercially available ELISA kit. Agreement was defined by overall, positive, and negative agreement. Wilson Score was used to calculate confidence intervals (CI) on binomial probability and Spearman's rho and Bland-Altman test were used to assess correlations.

ELISA and SPR-based assay were able to identify circulating AAA in ADL-treated patients, with the percentage of positivity varying among the methods, with an overall agreement of 79%. AAA were detected in 18 (38 %) out of the 47 treated patients by the ELISA whereas SPR-based assay detected 10 (21 %) out of 47 samples.

Real-time label free SPR-based protocol for both AAA and ADL quantification has been set-up. Although quantitative differences were observed when compared with ELISA, the agreement among methodologies was high, particularly for ADL quantification within the therapeutic window of the drug.

To review the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for developing anti-drug antibodies (AAA) in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU) treated with Adalimumab (ADA).

A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane, and medRxiv. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects.

Nine out of 2,373 studies were included. The prevalence of AAA in NIU patients treated with ADA was 9% (95% CI: 2% to 37%, I2 = 95% with a P<0.01), it was significantly higher in real-life scenarios (observational studies) than in clinical trials. The pooled incidence at 12 months was 27% (CI 95% 16%-42% I2 = 0%). Several factors have been associated with AAA generation in NIU patients, including the non-use of concomitant immunosuppressants, presence of autoimmune systemic disease, female gender, etc.

This study showed that AAA prevalence is higher in real-life scenarios compared to clinical trials. Further research is needed to elucidate the factors that trigger AAA generation in NIU patients.

Approved options for advanced therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited. Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are approved in adult IBD, their benefit in pediatric populations is not yet delineated. We present a 13-year-old female patient with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to numerous therapies and courses of prednisone that ultimately responded to a JAK inhibitor. Initial treatment consisted of 5-aminosalicylate and azathioprine. This was changed to adalimumab due to persistent symptoms. Repeat colonoscopy revealed pancolitis, thus she was transitioned to vedolizumab. She was hospitalized twice for uncontrolled symptoms on vedolizumab and subsequent scope showed continued pancolitis. As a result, she transitioned to ustekinumab without symptomatic relief after adjusting to monthly dosing. The family declined colectomy, opting to exhaust all medical therapies. Upadacitinib was started and her symptoms resolved within 1 week, and she remains in steroid-free remission. This case illustrates the possible role of JAK inhibitors in extensively refractory pediatric UC patients before colectomy.

Previously, we showed that the combination of methotrexate and adalimumab treatment leads to less antidrug antibody development. In this study, we quantify the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of adalimumab and evaluate the influence of methotrexate cotreatment. A population PK-PD model was developed using prospective data from 59 patients with psoriasis (baseline PASI = 12.6) receiving adalimumab over 49 weeks. Typical PK and PD parameters and their corresponding interpatient variability were estimated. We performed a covariate analysis to assess whether interpatient variability could be explained by addition of methotrexate and other covariates. In total, 330 PASIs, 252 adalimumab serum concentrations, and 247 antidrug antibody titers were available. Presence of antidrug antibodies (adalimumab group = 46.7%, adalimumab + methotrexate group = 38.7%; P = .031) was correlated with increased adalimumab apparent clearance (P < .001). In the PD model, the use of concomitant methotrexate was borderline to significantly correlated with a decreased half-maximal inhibitory concentration (adalimumab concentration for which clinical response score is reduced by half; P < .10). On the basis of our PK-PD model, concomitant use of methotrexate indirectly increases adalimumab concentration, partially through less antidrug antibodies formation, which may result in better efficacy.

Concentration-therapeutic efficacy relationships have been observed for several therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (TmAb), where low circulating levels can result in ineffective treatment and high concentrations can cause adverse reactions. Rapid therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of TmAb drugs would provide the opportunity to adjust an individual patient's dosing regimen to improve treatment results. However, TDM for immunotherapies is currently limited to centralised testing methods with long sample-collection to result timeframes. Here, we show four point-of-care (PoC) TmAb biosensors by combining anti-idiotypic Affimer proteins and NanoBiT split luciferase technology at a molecular level to provide a platform for rapid quantification (<10 minutes) for four clinically relevant TmAb (rituximab, adalimumab, ipilimumab and trastuzumab). The rituximab sensor performed best with 4 pM limit of detection (LoD) and a quantifiable range between 8 pM-2 nM with neglectable matrix effects in serum up to 1%. After dilution of serum samples, the resulting quantifiable range for all four sensors falls within the clinically relevant range and compares favourably with the sensitivity and/or time-to-result of current ELISA standards. Further development of these sensors into a PoC test may improve treatment outcome and quality of life for patients receiving immunotherapy.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α antibodies, including infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab, which were the first biologic therapeutic agents, have a crucial position in advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to investigate serum albumin (Alb) change as a prognostic factor for the therapeutic effect of ADA in UC. Thirty-four patients with UC treated with ADA were enrolled in this study and were divided into failure and non-failure groups. Biological data, such as Alb were compared between the two groups. Thirteen patients showed failure within six months. Examination of the biological data showed a significant difference between the two groups only in the week 2/week 0 Alb ratio. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to predict failure, the cut-off value of week 2/week 0 Alb ratio was 1.00, and the area under the curve was 0.868 (95% confidence interval: 0.738-0.999). In addition, in the sub-group analysis of only clinically active patients, the week 2/week 0 Alb ratio of the non-failure group was significantly higher than that of the failure group, and the cut-off-value in ROC analysis was 1.00. Week 2/week 0 Alb ratio ≤ 1 predicts failure within six months of ADA for UC.

Immunogenicity against anti-TNF antibodies usually leads to loss of response. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of clinical strategies to improve clinical remission and pharmacokinetics upon detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA).

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with ADA against infliximab or adalimumab were identified through a single centre database search covering 2004-2022. Criteria for successful intervention upon ADA detection (baseline) were clinical remission after 1 year without further change in strategy.

Two-hundred-and-fifty-five IBD patients (206 Crohn's disease) were identified. At baseline, median ADA level was 77 AU/ml; 50.2% of patients were in clinical remission. Implemented strategies were: (1) 81/255 (32%) conservative management, (2) 102/255 (40%) anti-TNF optimisation, (3) 72/255 (28%) switch within or out of class. Switching was the most successful strategy for clinical remission (from 19% at baseline to 69% at 1 year, p < 0.001). Patients that continued the same dose anti-TNF or discontinued biological therapy were often in clinical remission, but deteriorated significantly (-22.7%, p = 0.004). Anti-TNF dose intensification with immunomodulator optimisation was the fastest (median 3.0 months, p = 0.009) and most effective (65% ADA suppression, p < 0.001) strategy to suppress ADA compared to solely anti-TNF or immunomodulator optimisation.

Switching therapy, within or out of class, is the most successful strategy to regain and maintain clinical remission upon immunogenicity. When switching to another anti-TNF, concomitant immunomodulatory therapy should be started or continued to prevent repeated immunogenic loss of response. Anti-TNF dose escalation with concomitant immunomodulator optimisation is the fastest and most effective strategy to suppress ADA.

Nonresponse to an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent in patients with Crohn disease (CD) is often managed by either a switch to a different class of biologic (ie, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) or by cycling to another anti-TNF agent (ie, adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol). Persistence after a switch to a different biologic class or after cycling within the anti-TNF class was assessed in patients with nonresponse to an anti-TNF agent.

Adults with CD who discontinued from an anti-TNF agent and either switched to a different class of biologic (ie, anti-interleukin/integrin; the switching cohort) or cycled within the anti-TNF class (the cycling cohort) between September 23, 2016, and August 1, 2019, were selected from a commercial database. The index date was defined as the date of the first claim of the subsequent-line biologic (index biologic) after an anti-TNF. The switching and cycling cohorts were balanced with regard to baseline characteristics, using inverse probability of treatment weights-average treatment effect (IPTW-ATE). Persistence with the index biologic was defined as consistent use with no gaps of >120 days (ustekinumab, vedolizumab, infliximab) or of >60 days (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) in biologic supply. Composite end points were persistence while being corticosteroid-free (defined as no use of corticosteroids with ≥14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/nonindex biologics). Weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to assess outcomes at 12 months post-index.

There were 444 patients in the weighted switching cohort (mean age, 40.4 years; 56.3% female) and 441 in the weighted cycling cohort (mean age, 39.5 years; 58.4% female). At 12 months post-index, the rate of persistence with the index biologic was 75.7% in the switching cohort compared to 67.5% in the cycling cohort (log-rank P = 0.023); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 58.2% compared to 44.2%, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). The rate of persistence was 44% greater in the switching compared to that in the cycling cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.88; P = 0.007); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 56% greater in the switching cohort (HR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.28-1.90; P < 0.001). The between-cohort difference in persistence while being corticosteroid-free was not statistically significant (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89-1.32; P = 0.426).

Patients with CD who switched to a different biologic class were more persistent than were patients who cycled to another anti-TNF agent. These findings may be useful for physicians when considering the treatment of patients who have experienced nonresponse or loss of response to the first-line anti-TNF agent.

Underdosing of adalimumab can result in non-response and poor disease control in patients with rheumatic disease or inflammatory bowel disease. In this pilot study we aimed to predict adalimumab concentrations with population pharmacokinetic model-based Bayesian forecasting early in therapy.

Adalimumab pharmacokinetic models were identified with a literature search. A fit-for-purpose evaluation of the model was performed for rheumatologic and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with adalimumab peak (first dose) and trough samples (first and seventh dose) obtained by a volumetric absorptive microsampling technique. Steady state adalimumab concentrations were predicted after the first adalimumab administration. Predictive performance was calculated with mean prediction error (MPE) and normalised root mean square error (RMSE).

Thirty-six patients (22 rheumatologic and 14 IBD) were analysed in our study. After stratification for absence of anti-adalimumab antibodies, the calculated MPE was -2.6% and normalised RMSE 24.0%. Concordance between predicted and measured adalimumab serum concentrations falling within or outside the therapeutic window was 75%. Three patients (8.3%) developed detectable concentrations of anti-adalimumab antibodies.

This prospective study demonstrates that adalimumab concentrations at steady state can be predicted from early samples during the induction phase.

The trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register with trial registry number NTR 7692 ( www.trialregister.nl ).

Biologic agents with various mechanisms against Crohn's disease (CD) have been released and are widely used in clinical practice. However, two anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL), are the only biologic agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration for pediatric CD currently. Therefore, in pediatric CD, the choice of biologic agents should be made more carefully to achieve the therapeutic goal. There are currently no head-to-head trials of biologic agents in pediatric or adult CD. There is a lack of accumulated data for pediatric CD, which requires the extrapolation of adult data for the positioning of biologics in pediatric CD. From a pharmacokinetic point of view, IFX is more advantageous than ADL when the inflammatory burden is high, and ADL is expected to be advantageous over IFX in sustaining remission in the maintenance phase. Additionally, we reviewed the safety profile, immunogenicity, preference, and compliance between IFX and ADL and provide practical insights into the choice of anti-TNF therapy in pediatric CD. Careful evaluation of clinical indications and disease behavior is essential when prescribing anti-TNF agents. In addition, factors such as the efficacy of induction and maintenance of remission, safety profile, immunogenicity, patient preference, and compliance play an important role in evaluating and selecting treatment options.

Despite its effectiveness in treating Crohn's disease, adalimumab is associated with an increased risk of infections and high health-care costs. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes of increased adalimumab dose intervals versus conventional dosing in patients with Crohn's disease in stable remission.

The LADI study was a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, parallel, randomised controlled trial, done in six academic hospitals and 14 general hospitals in the Netherlands. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with luminal Crohn's disease (with or without concomitant perianal disease) were eligible when in steroid-free clinical and biochemical remission (defined as Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] score <5, faecal calprotectin <150 μg/g, and C-reactive protein <10 mg/L) for at least 9 months on a stable dose of 40 mg subcutaneous adalimumab every 2 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to the intervention group or control group by the coordinating investigator using a secure web-based system with variable block randomisation (block sizes of 6, 9, and 12). Randomisation was stratified on concomitant use of thiopurines and methotrexate. Patients and health-care providers were not masked to group assignment. Patients allocated to the intervention group increased adalimumab dose intervals to 40 mg every 3 weeks at baseline and further to every 4 weeks if they remained in clinical and biochemical remission at week 24. Patients in the control group continued their 2-weekly dose interval. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of persistent flares at week 48 defined as the presence of at least two of the following criteria: HBI score of 5 or more, C-reactive protein 10 mg/L or more, and faecal calprotectin more than 250 μg/g for more than 8 weeks and a concurrent decrease in the adalimumab dose interval or start of escape medication. The non-inferiority margin was 15% on a risk difference scale. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03172377, and is not recruiting.

Between May 3, 2017, and July 6, 2020, 174 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=113) or the control group (n=61). Four patients from the intervention group and one patient from the control group were excluded from the analysis for not meeting inclusion criteria. 85 (50%) of 169 participants were female and 84 (50%) were male. At week 48, the cumulative incidence of persistent flares in the intervention group (three [3%] of 109) was non-inferior compared with the control group (zero; pooled adjusted risk difference 1·86% [90% CI -0·35 to 4·07). Seven serious adverse events occurred, all in the intervention group, of which two (both patients with intestinal obstruction) were possibly related to the intervention. Per 100 person-years, 168·35 total adverse events, 59·99 infection-related adverse events, and 42·57 gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in the intervention group versus 134·67, 75·03, and 5·77 in the control group, respectively.

The individual benefit of increasing adalimumab dose intervals versus the risk of disease recurrence is a trade-off that should take patient preferences regarding medication and the risk of a flare into account.

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.

Despite the evolution in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management during the last 20 years owing to the advent of new advanced therapies, anti-TNF agents still remain the cornerstone of therapy for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, this does not only secure favorable outcomes for patients considering the progressive disease character and the high likelihood of primary or secondary loss of response. Therefore, trying to reach a better treatment approach and maximize the benefits anti-TNF agents offer, optimization strategies should be examined. It has been indicated that optimizing treatment with anti-TNF enhances drug efficacy and has been associated with improved disease outcomes and a complication-free disease course. From this perspective, we aim to provide an overview of currently available data and recent advances in the practices of anti-TNF treatment optimization. Special focus has been given to the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), as well as the utility of combining anti-TNF with an immunomodulator and the treat-to-target approach.

Despite some variability in ideal serum Adalimumab (ADA) concentrations, there is increasing evidence that higher concentrations of anti-TNF-α agents can be associated with sustained efficacy, and low or undetectable levels may lead to loss of response. This study aims to correlate serum ADA concentrations with clinical and endoscopic activity in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). A cross-sectional and multicentric study was performed with patients with CD, who used ADA for at least 24 weeks. Patients were allocated into groups according to the presence of clinical or endoscopic disease activity. Serum ADA concentrations were measured and compared between groups. Overall, 89 patients were included. A total of 27 patients had clinically active CD and 62 were in clinical remission. Forty patients had endoscopic disease activity and 49 were in endoscopic remission. The mean serum ADA concentration was 10.2 μg/mL in patients with clinically active CD and 14.3 μg/mL in patients in clinical remission (p = 0.395). The mean serum ADA concentration in patients with endoscopic activity was 11.3 μg/mL as compared to 14.5 μg/mL in those with endoscopic remission (p = 0.566). There was no difference between serum ADA concentrations regarding clinical or endoscopic activity in CD, as compared to patients in remission.

Adalimumab dose escalation is often recommended for inflammatory bowel disease patients in cases of loss of response. The usual adalimumab intensification regimen was 40 mg every week. Recently the pharmaceutical companies commercialized the 80mg injection pen. In the biosimilars era, this pen was sold at the same price as the 40mg pen. Due to this and for patient comfort, we proposed that our stable intensified adalimumab patients on a 40mg every-week regimen, change to a dose of 80mg every-other-week.

an observational study was performed to monitor outcome through this posologic change. Clinical, analytic parameters and adalimumab trough levels were prospectively obtained at baseline, 4 and 12 months after posologic change. The evolution of this cohort and calculates savings were described.

13 patients were included in the study and the median time of adalimumab intensification prior to posologic change to 80mg eow was 32 months (IQR 29-63). At 4 months, all patients maintained adalimumab 80mg every-other-week. After month 4, two patients returned to the previous regimen after mild worsening, without significant changes in CRP, calprotectin or adalimumab-trough-levels. At 1 year, adalimumab was stopped in one patient in remission with undetectable levels and positive adalimumab-antibodies. No significant differences in adalimumab-trough-levels were noted before and after the posologic change. Costs fell from 16276 €/patient/year of treatment to 8812.15 €/patient/year of treatment.

In IBD patients with stable response to adalimumab intensification regimen of 40 mg every-week, changing to 80mg every-other-week seems to maintain response and similar adalimumab-trough-levels. Furthermore, it is cost-saving, although some patients may perceive mild symptoms.

Patients with postoperative Crohn's disease are difficult to manage because of their risk of experiencing a more severe course, multiple symptom confounders, and poor sensitivity of symptomatic remission to rule out intestinal inflammation. In this group, data are lacking on biologic therapeutic efficacy, and recommendations are lacking for those with multiple medication failures. Novel noninvasive testing can simultaneously exclude alternate causes of symptoms (serum C4, fecal fat, small intestinal bowel overgrowth breath testing) and assess intestinal inflammation (fecal calprotectin, endoscopic healing index). In addition, endoscopy-based disease activity assessment and management are required. Endoscopy should be performed within 6 months of surgery, and aggressive disease activity monitoring can be considered with colonoscopy every 1-2 years subsequently to ensure late recurrence is detected. Patients with multiple resections should be screened for short bowel syndrome. Predictive biomarkers are needed to guide medication selection in this high-risk population. Postoperative prophylactic biologic therapy is prudent for patients with preoperative biologic failure. However, there are no high-quality data to guide which agent should be selected. Selecting biologics with an alternative mechanism of action in those who had failed a biologic with adequate drug concentrations and selection of different agents in those with previous intolerance are reasonable. Significantly more study is required to assess the efficacy of therapies in this setting.

The introduction of biological agents with strong anti-inflammatory action, such as antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, has changed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment strategy and goals, and has contributed significantly to improve the long-term prognosis of patients. Moreover, several biological agents are being used or researched in pediatric populations. However, only two biological agents, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL), are currently approved for children and adolescents. In pediatric IBD, there are limitations and burdens associated with facilitating mucosal healing (MH) when utilizing these two biological agents. ADL is effective in both naïve patients and those with previous experience with biologics. Beyond clinical remission, this drug is also effective for MH and histological remission. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to further enhance the effectiveness of ADL treatment can be expected to reduce treatment failure of ADL and pave the way for appropriate treatment in the treat-to-target era. This review paper focuses on ADL, examine studies conducted in children, and determine the role this agent plays against pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

There is currently little knowledge on factors associated with the relapse of Crohn's disease (CD) in children. The aims of this study were to describe the risk factors associated with relapse in pediatric CD and the changes in the relapse rate over the past decade.

Patients younger than 18 years and diagnosed between 2009 and 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Clinical, endoscopic, histological, and laboratory data, as well as induction and maintenance treatments, were collected from the medical records. Survival analyses and Cox regression models were used to assess the impact of these risk factors on relapse.

Six hundred thirty-nine patients were included. There was a decrease in the clinical relapse rate over the past decade: 70.9% of the patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2014 relapsed as compared with 49.1% of the patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2019 (P < 0.0001). The following variables were associated with clinical relapse: female sex (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.52, P = 0.0007), exposure to oral 5-ASA (aHR = 1.44, P = 0.04), use of immunomodulatory agents compared with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (methotrexate aHR = 1.73, P = 0.003; thiopurines aHR = 1.63, P = 0.002), presence of granulomas (aHR = 1.34, P = 0.02) and increased eosinophils on intestinal biopsies (aHR = 1.36, P = 0.02), high levels of C-reactive protein (aHR = 1.01, P < 0.0001) and fecal calprotectin (aHR = 1.08, P < 0.0001), and low serum infliximab levels (aHR = 2.32, P = 0.001).

Relapse of pediatric CD has decreased in the past decade. The risk of relapse is significantly associated with clinical, endoscopic, histological, and laboratory variables and treatment strategies.

Evidence regarding the risk of immunogenicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) therapies to a subsequent anti-TNFα (either infliximab or adalimumab) is conflicting. We aimed to assess the risk of consecutive immunogenicity to anti-TNFα in a large cohort of patients.

This was a multicenter retrospective study. Medical records of adult and pediatric IBD switchers who had pharmacokinetic data for both agents between 2014 and 2020 were retrieved. Data including age, sex, disease type, duration of therapies, and concomitant use of immunomodulators (IMMs) were recorded.

Overall, 164 patients were included [52% female; 88% Crohn's disease; mean age = 24.4 ± 14.6 years; 108 (66%) switched from infliximab to adalimumab and 56 (34%) vice versa]; 120 (73.1%) patients switched due to an immunogenic failure. Among patients switching therapy from infliximab to adalimumab due to an immunogenic failure immunogenicity to infliximab was significantly associated with consecutive immunogenicity to adalimumab (p = 0.026). Forthy four out of 120 patients (36.6%) with an immunogenic failure to the first anti-TNFα started an IMM with the second anti-TNFα. This combination with IMM was not associated with reduction of consecutive immunogenicity (p = 0.31), but it was associated with longer drug retention (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that older age at second anti-TNFα, adjusted to the chronology of therapy and sex, was associated with increased immunogenicity to the second anti-TNFα.

Patients with IBD who switch from infliximab to adalimumab following an immunogenic failure are at increased risk for consecutive immunogenicity to adalimumab. IMM use after a switch prolongs drug retention.

Beneficial response to first-line immunosuppressive azathioprine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is low due to high rates of adverse events. Co-administrating allopurinol has been shown to improve tolerability. However, data on this co-therapy as first-line treatment are scarce.

Retrospective comparison of long-term effectiveness and safety of first-line low-dose azathioprine-allopurinol co-therapy (LDAA) with first-line azathioprine monotherapy (AZAm) in patients with IBD without metabolite monitoring.

Clinical benefit was defined as ongoing therapy without initiation of steroids, biologics or surgery. Secondary outcomes included CRP, HBI/SCCAI, steroid withdrawal and adverse events.

In total, 166 LDAA and 118 AZAm patients (median follow-up 25 and 27 months) were evaluated. Clinical benefit was more frequently observed in LDAA patients at 6 months (74% vs. 53%, p = 0.0003), 12 months (54% vs. 37%, p = 0.01) and in the long-term (median 36 months; 37% vs. 24%, p = 0.04). Throughout follow-up, AZAm patients were 60% more likely to fail therapy, due to a higher intolerance rate (45% vs. 26%, p = 0.001). Only 73% of the effective AZA dose was tolerated in AZAm patients, while LDAA could be initiated and maintained at its target dose. Incidence of myelotoxicity and elevated liver enzymes was similar in both cohorts, and both conditions led to LDAA withdrawal in only 2%. Increasing allopurinol from 100 to 200-300 mg/day significantly lowered liver enzymes in 5/6 LDAA patients with hepatotoxicity.

Our poor AZAm outcomes emphasize that optimization of azathioprine is needed. We demonstrated a long-term safe and more effective profile of first-line LDAA. This co-therapy may therefore be considered standard first-line immunosuppressive.

To compare the timing of serum anti-drug antibodies in adult and pediatric age groups, males and females, treated for inflammatory bowel disease or arthritis with adalimumab or infliximab by retrospectively combining data collected during a 2-year therapeutic drug monitoring period.

Four hundred thirty sera were divided in groups collected at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (T0, T3, T6, T12, and T24) after initiation of therapy and assayed for drug and relative anti-drug antibodies levels. At each time point, the percentage of sera presenting anti-drug antibodies, as well as the drug concentrations, were calculated and correlated with patient age and sex.

Anti-drug antibodies were present in 31.5% of sera and were significantly higher in the pediatric age group than in the adult age group, through all time points. The percentages of sera showing anti-drug antibodies were significantly different as early as 3 months and were sera from pediatric female group. The percentages of sera showing anti-drug antibodies reached the highest value at 6 months in the pediatric age group and at 12 months in the adult age group.

Sera from pediatric had an earlier presence of anti-drug antibodies than adults. In particular, pediatric females sera showed the fastest anti-drug antibodies development.

Dose escalation of adalimumab (ADA) for loss or response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common practice. Recent data suggest improved outcomes with an ADA concentration of 12 mcg/mL, but limited data are available on the ability to achieve a target concentration. The aim of this study was to determine the expected change in serum ADA concentration after a dose escalation performed every 7 days in patients with IBD.

A retrospective cohort of patients with IBD receiving ADA was divided into every fourteen-day dosing, every 7-day dosing, and dose escalation (ie, q14 to q7 day dosing). The primary outcome was the change in ADA concentration. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of achieving a target ADA concentration of ≥12 mcg/mL.

Overall, 380 patients were identified, of whom 200 underwent dose escalation, 100 remained on q14 days dosing, and 80 were maintained on q7 day dosing. After dose escalation, the mean ADA concentration increased by 5.5 mcg/mL (P < 0.0001). After dose escalation, a significant proportion of patients achieved an ADA concentration ≥12 mcg/mL (P = 0.0019), as well as clinical remission (P = 0.0053). Based on multiple logistic regression, age of <46 years [odds ratio (OR): 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 4.6; P < 0.01], body mass index of <29 (OR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.5; P < 0.0001), and initial ADA concentration of ≥3.0 mcg/mL were found to be associated with a target ADA concentration ≥12 mcg/mL (OR: 4.76; 95% CI: 2.3, 9.7; P < 0.0001).

The average expected increase in serum ADA concentration after dose escalation from q14 to q7 days was 5.5 mcg/mL. The initial ADA concentration, age, and body mass index may influence the ability to achieve a target ADA concentration after dose escalation.

Biomarker normalization and endoscopic remission are superior to clinical remission in achieving improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

To study whether higher maintenance adalimumab levels are associated with clinical remission, biomarker normalization, and endoscopic remission.

Data were collected retrospectively from the patients' medical records. We defined clinical remission as a Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤5 or a partial Mayo score ≤2 for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), respectively, biomarker normalization as a C-reactive protein <0.5 mg/dL and/or calprotectin <250 (mg/kg), endoscopic remission as a (simple endoscopic score-CD) ≤3/4 for ileal/extensive CD, respectively, or an endoscopic Mayo score ≤1 for UC, and deep remission as the combination of clinical and endoscopic remission with normal biomarkers.

Ninety-seven patients were included (82 CD and 15 UC). Patients who achieved clinical remission, biomarker normalization, or endoscopic remission had higher serum trough adalimumab levels compared with patients not in remission [mean (M)±standard error (SE)=8.98±0.78 vs. 5.92±0.96 μg/mL; P=0.016, 9.38±0.85 vs. 5.48±0.87 μg/mL; P=0.002; 9.13±0.88 vs. 6.02±0.77 μg/mL; P=0.019, respectively]. Receiver-operating curve analysis showed that an adalimumab level of ≥8.25 μg/mL was associated with deep remission (sensitivity 84%, specificity 70%, area under the curve 0.775; P<0.001).

Clinical remission, biomarker normalization, and endoscopic remission are positively associated with adalimumab trough levels. Adalimumab level of ≥8.25 μg/mL is associated with deep remission. This study provides additional data to guide therapeutic drug monitoring with adalimumab.

Infliximab and adalimumab concentrations are associated with important outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Antibodies to infliximab (ATI) and adalimumab (ATA) are associated with reduced drug concentrations and worse outcomes. Because the efficacy of dose escalation to overcome antibodies is unclear, we assessed the impact of this strategy to overcome immunogenicity in IBD.

Infliximab and adalimumab dosing, drug, and antibody concentrations were extracted from a database of patients with IBD having specimens collected for therapeutic drug monitoring. The primary outcome compared proportions with either infliximab ≥5 μg/mL or adalimumab ≥7.5 μg/mL and undetectable antibodies between dose-escalated and non-escalated patients. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses determined antibody concentrations below which dose escalation was associated with the primary outcome.

The study included 63,176 patients treated with infliximab and 46,429 patients treated with adalimumab. We detected ATI and ATA in 23.6% (n = 14,900) of patients treated with infliximab and 19.6% (n = 9101) of patients treated with adalimumab. In patients with ATI, infliximab dose escalation (n = 453) yielded higher proportions achieving the primary outcome (47.5% vs 30.9%; P < 0.001), greater drug concentration increases (5.9 μg/mL vs 0.2 μg/mL; P < 0.001), and ATI reductions (4.3 U/mL vs 1.9 U/mL; P = 0.002) compared to no escalation (n = 204). An ATI threshold of 8.55 U/mL was associated with achieving the primary outcome with dose escalation (area under the curve = 0.66). For patients with ATI ≤8.55 U/mL (n = 274), higher proportions (59.1% vs 29.6%; P < 0.001) achieved the primary outcome compared with those with ATI >8.55 U/mL (n = 179). No patients treated with adalimumab achieved the primary outcome (0/390), regardless of dose escalation (n = 87).

Dose escalation increased drug concentrations and eliminated antibodies with infliximab but not adalimumab. Initial ATI ≤8.55 U/mL was associated with increased efficacy of dose escalation using this assay.

Loss of response to anti-TNF agents is a common clinical problem. Dose escalation may be effective for reestablishing clinical response in Crohn's disease (CD).

To perform a systematic review assessing the efficacy of escalated maintenance anti-TNF therapy in CD.

EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases were searched for English language publications through to April 25, 2021. Full-text articles evaluating escalated maintenance treatment (infliximab or adalimumab) in adult CD patients were included.

A total of 4733 records were identified, and 68 articles met eligibility criteria. Rates of clinical response (33%-100%) and remission (15%-83%) after empiric dose escalation for loss of response to standard anti-TNF therapy were high but varied across studies. Dose intensification strategies (doubling the dose versus shortening the therapeutic interval) were similarly efficacious. Dose-escalated patients tended to have higher serum drug levels compared to those on standard dosing. An exposure-response relationship following dose escalation was found in a number of observational studies. Randomised controlled trials comparing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to empiric treatment intensification have failed to reach their primary end-points. Strategies including Bayesian dashboard-dosing and early treatment escalation targeting biomarker normalisation were found to be associated with improved long-term outcomes.

Empiric escalation of maintenance anti-TNF therapy can recapture clinical response in a majority of patients with secondary loss of response to standard maintenance doses. Proactive optimisation of maintenance dosing might prolong time to loss of response in some patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the measurement of drug and antidrug antibody concentrations in individuals to guide treatment decisions. In patients with Crohn disease (CD), TDM, used either reactively or proactively, is emerging as a valuable tool for optimization of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. Reactive TDM is carried out in response to treatment failure, whereas proactive TDM involves the periodic monitoring of patients responding to TNF antagonist therapy to allow treatment optimization. In patients with CD, most of the available data for TDM relate to the first-to-market TNF antagonist infliximab and, to a lesser extent, to adalimumab and certolizumab pegol. Several gastroenterology associations, including the American Gastroenterology Association, have endorsed the use of reactive TDM in patients with active CD. However, fewer recommendations currently exist for the use of proactive TDM, although several new prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating proactive TDM strategies have been published. In this review, the current evidence for reactive and proactive TDM is discussed, and a proactive treatment algorithm for certolizumab pegol based on previously published threshold concentrations is proposed.

The aim of this study was to examine whether biomarkers are predictive of the adalimumab (ADA) trough level and antidrug antibody development in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

Using data obtained in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (PLANET), we assessed serial changes in a novel biomarker - leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) - during ADA treatment for patients with active CD and UC. We measured serum LRG, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin (fCAL) at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 52. The ADA trough level and anti-ADA antibody (AAA) were also measured at weeks 12 and 52. Correlations between the ADA trough level, AAA, and biomarkers were examined.

In all, 34 patients with CD and 47 patients with UC were enrolled. The ADA trough level at week 12 or at the time of ADA withdrawal was 8.5 ± 3.9 in the AAA-negative group (n = 70) and 2.9 ± 2.7 μg/mL in the AAA-positive group (n = 8) (p < 0.0001). The ADA trough level at week 12 or at the time of ADA withdrawal was associated with pretreatment LRG (p = 0.0437 and r = -0.23).

LRG, rather than CRP or fCAL, may be a marker for predicting the trough level of ADA for patients with CD and UC treated with ADA.

Adalimumab (ADA) trough level and anti-ADA antibody (AAA) positivity influence mucosal healing and loss of response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this study, we clarified the correlation between ADA monitoring, including non-trough level, and real-world IBD clinical outcomes. This retrospective, observational, single-center study involved patients with ulcerative colitis (19) and Crohn's disease (33) treated with ADA from January 2007 to August 2018. Serum ADA and AAA levels were measured 4‒14 days after ADA administration. The AAA positivity rate was 23.1% (12/52). ADA continuity was higher in AAA-negative patients than in AAA-positive patients (P = 0.223). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that a serum AAA cut-off of 9.2 μg/mL was associated with ADA continuity. The ADA level was significantly higher in the endoscopic remission group than in the non-remission group (P = 0.02). Based on the ROC curve analysis results of serum ADA level and endoscopic remission, the cut-off value of the serum ADA level was set to 11.1 μg/mL. Under the combined use of ADA with immunomodulators and AAA positivity, ADA continuity was significantly higher when the serum AAA level at 4-14 days after ADA administration was ≥9.2 μg/mL. Furthermore, endoscopic remission can be expected with a serum ADA level of ≥11.1 μg/mL. Overall, to predict clinical outcomes, it would be useful to measure the blood level of ADA regardless of the timing of the trough.

Identification of biomarkers that predict severe Crohn's disease is an urgent unmet research need, but existing research is piecemeal and haphazard.

To identify biomarkers that are potentially able to predict the development of subsequent severe Crohn's disease.

This was a prognostic systematic review with meta-analysis reserved for those potential predictors with sufficient existing research (defined as five or more primary studies).

PubMed and EMBASE searched from inception to 1 January 2016, updated to 1 January 2018.

Eligible studies were studies that compared biomarkers in patients who did or did not subsequently develop severe Crohn's disease. We excluded biomarkers that had insufficient research evidence. A clinician and two statisticians independently extracted data relating to predictors, severe disease definitions, event numbers and outcomes, including odds/hazard ratios. We assessed risk of bias. We searched for associations with subsequent severe disease rather than precise estimates of strength. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed separately for odds ratios.

In total, 29,950 abstracts yielded just 71 individual studies, reporting 56 non-overlapping cohorts. Five clinical biomarkers (Montreal behaviour, age, disease duration, disease location and smoking), two serological biomarkers (anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies and anti-flagellin antibodies) and one genetic biomarker (nucleotide-binding oligomerisation domain-containing protein 2) displayed statistically significant prognostic potential. Overall, the strongest association with subsequent severe disease was identified for Montreal B2 and B3 categories (odds ratio 4.09 and 6.25, respectively).

Definitions of severe disease varied widely, and some studies confounded diagnosis and prognosis. Risk of bias was rated as 'high' in 92% of studies overall. Some biomarkers that are used regularly in daily practice, for example C-reactive protein, were studied too infrequently for meta-analysis.

Research for individual biomarkers to predict severe Crohn's disease is scant, heterogeneous and at a high risk of bias. Despite a large amount of potential research, we encountered relatively few biomarkers with data sufficient for meta-analysis, identifying only eight biomarkers with potential predictive capability.

We will use existing data sets to develop and then validate a predictive model based on the potential predictors identified by this systematic review. Contingent on the outcome of that research, a prospective external validation may prove clinically desirable.

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016029363.

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 45. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

We investigated the therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab (ADL) on clinical remission (CR) and mucosal healing (MH) rates in paediatric patients with Crohn disease (CD). Furthermore, long-term treatment efficacy of ADL in paediatric CD was evaluated through 3-year follow-up.

We conducted a prospective study of 31 patients with CD who received ADL maintenance therapy and underwent endoscopic evaluation of MH and pharmacokinetic analysis. Patients in CR were identified based on Paediatric Crohn Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) scores less than 10. Patients with MH were identified based on Simple Endoscopic Scores for Crohn Disease (SES-CD) of less than 2.

At 4 months and 1 year of ADL treatment, 28 and 26 patients, respectively, were under CR; 13 and 17 patients, respectively, achieved MH. The median trough levels (TLs) of ADL were higher in patients in CR (7.6 ± 3.5 μg/mL) than in patients with active disease (5.1 ± 2.2 μg/mL). ADL TLs were significantly higher in patients who achieved MH than in those who did not (14.2 ± 7.6 vs 7.8 ± 5.2 μg/mL). The optimal cut-point for predicting MH at 1 year of ADL treatment was 8.18 μg/mL. During long-term follow-up, ADL TLs were stably maintained over 10 μg/mL; not only CR and MH but also histologic remission was obtained at a high rate. ADL administration maintained a positive effect on growth during the maintenance period.

ADL TLs were significantly higher in paediatric patients with CD who achieved CR or MH. ADL treatment showed long-term stable efficacy and positive effects on growth indicators.

Certolizumab pegol (CZP) has been successfully used for the treatment of Crohn disease (CD); however, real-world data regarding the utility of CZP trough levels (CTLs) are lacking. We aimed to correlate CTL with CD outcomes and to determine frequency of CZP antibodies.

Retrospective evaluation of all CD patients on maintenance CZP with CTL obtained between 2016 and 2019. Outcomes included: median CTL, presence of anti-CZP antibodies, biochemical response (BR), clinical response (CR), radiologic response (RR), radiologic healing (RH), and mucosal healing (MH).

Seventy-seven CD patients were included. Median CTL was 18.9 µg/mL (interquartile range, 7.6-35.4). Twenty-three patients (27.3%) had positive antibody levels, with lower median CTL compared to patients with no antibodies (0.0 vs 29.8; P < 0.0001). Median CTL levels were higher in patients with vs without CR (30.4 vs 10.3 µg/mL; P = 0.0015) and RR (29.6 vs 5.8 µg/mL; P = 0.006). CZP dosing at least every 2 weeks was associated with higher odds of achieving MH (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-9.97). CTL resulted in change in clinical management in 62.7% of cases and presence of CMZ antibodies was associated with an odds ratio of 5.83 (95% confidence interval, 1.57-21.73) of change in management. Receiver operating characteristic curve and quartile analysis suggested that CTL >19 µg/mL is associated with increased rates of CR and RR.

Higher CTL was significantly associated with CR and RR. The rate of CZP antibodies was 27.3%. Our data suggest maintenance CTL of ≥19 µg/mL should be achieved in order to optimize outcomes in clinical practice.

Adalimumab (ADL) is a subcutaneously administered anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent used in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Higher ADL trough concentrations are associated with improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ADL might be facilitated by using dried blood samples (DBSs) from capillary blood obtained at home. The study aimed to compare serum ADL concentrations obtained through venipuncture to ADL concentrations in DBSs.

Patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis receiving induction or maintenance ADL therapy were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Blood was obtained through venipuncture and through DBSs during a regular outpatient visit (time point 1). Just before the next ADL administration, patients performed DBSs at home (time point 2). For this time point, serum ADL concentrations were estimated by Bayesian analysis.

Thirty-three patients with inflammatory bowel disease were enrolled. During the outpatient visit, samples were obtained after a median (interquartile range) of 6 (4-10) days after the last ADL dose. A high correlation was found between DBSs and venipuncture results (Pearson correlation: ≥0.96), without any clinically relevant bias. For DBSs performed by patients at home, initial comparison showed a moderate correlation between DBS results and predicted ADL serum concentrations (Pearson correlation: 0.51), although no bias was present. In addition, DBS eluate results compared with predicted ADL serum concentrations showed a mean absolute percentage error (ie, accuracy) of 45%.

High correlations were found between ADL serum concentrations obtained through conventional venipuncture and DBSs, which indicates that this home-based test can facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring-based ADL dose adjustments in daily practice.

Introduction: Adalimumab is effective in inducing and maintaining remission in children with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Therapeutic drug monitoring is an important strategy to maximize the response rates, but data on the association of serum adalimumab levels are lacking. This study aimed to assess the association of adalimumab concentrations at the end of induction and early during maintenance for long-term response. Materials and Methods: Serum samples for adalimumab level measurement were collected during routine visits between adalimumab administrations and therefore not necessarily at trough, both during the induction (week 4 ± 4) and maintenance phases (week 22 ± 4, 52 ± 4, and 82 ± 4). Adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibodies were measured retrospectively using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Disease activity was determined by Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index or Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index. Results: Thirty-two children (median age 14.9 years) were enrolled. Sixteen, 15, 14, and 12 patients were in remission at weeks 4, 22, 52, and 82, respectively. Median adalimumab concentration was higher at all time points in patients achieving sustained clinical remission. Adalimumab levels correlated with clinical and biochemical variables. Adalimumab concentration above 13.85 and 7.54 μg/ml at weeks 4 and 22 was associated with remission at weeks 52 and 82. Conclusions: Adalimumab non-trough levels are associated with long-term response in pediatric patients with IBD.

Neutralizing tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies have been widely used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the clinical practice. In this review, the principal biomarker analysis revealed that faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, serum or mucosal concentrations of anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibodies to anti-TNF mAbs are commonly used as current biomarkers in the evaluation of anti-TNF therapeutic efficacy. However, mucosal cytokine transcripts. microRNAs, proteomics and faecal and mucosal gut microbiota profile and mucosal histological features are reported to be novel candidates of biomarkers with high clinical utility in the evaluation of anti-TNF therapeutic efficacy in patients with IBD. Therefore, a robust validation of novel promising biomarkers and comparison studies between current used and novel biomarkers are urgently required to improve their value in the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and optimization of personalized medicine and identification of IBD candidates for anti-TNF therapy in future clinical practice.

Sensitive and reproducible pharmacokinetic (PK) assays and immunogenicity assessment are required as part of the complex and lengthy development process for biotherapeutic proteins. Ligand binding assays (LBAs) are included in a range of approaches applied to understand the nature and properties of the drug as well as the induction of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against the therapeutic, which can cause adverse events and loss of efficacy. Currently, most biotherapeutics are monoclonal human or humanized antibodies. Anti-idiotypic antibodies, targeting the idiotopic determinants of individual antibody drugs are recognized as perfect reagents for such LBAs. Here we describe the typical setups for these assays and how different types of anti-biotherapeutic antibodies can be used to establish selective and sensitive assays.

The reported immunogenicity rates of adalimumab differ significantly between studies because of a wide variety of factors related to the disease, patients, study design, and products.

The objective of this study was to characterize this variability and identify the major factors that contribute to these fluctuations.

A systematic literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that reported the immunogenicity rates of adalimumab were selected, and data pertaining to publication details, study characteristics, characteristics of the cohort at baseline, and immunogenicity were extracted. Records were sorted according to the immunogenicity assay type, and mean immunogenicity values for each assay type were calculated. Normalised immunogenicity was calculated for each report by subtracting the appropriate mean immunogenicity value. Collected data were subjected to statistical analysis, namely analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis, to unveil immunogenicity rate patterns across studies from a multivariate perspective.

In total, 130 publications were identified, from which 165 data records were extracted and included in the analysis. The immunogenicity rates of adalimumab averaged 24.9% across studies and varied significantly over time, ranging between 0 and 87%. An increase across time in the reported immunogenicity rates was detected, and the assay used to detect anti-adalimumab antibodies was a significant (but not exclusive) contributor to this trend. Furthermore, the principal components analysis revealed that the type of study and the exposure time were associated with the assay-normalised immunogenicity rates of adalimumab. Nonetheless, neither these nor the remaining factors included in this analysis seem to contribute to the temporal increase in reported immunogenicity rates.

Future studies that evaluate the patient-, product-, and disease-related factors behind the immunogenicity of adalimumab are required because the evidence published so far does not completely explain the temporal increase in immunogenicity rates detected in this analysis.

The relationship between clinical outcomes and serum anti-TNF levels is controversial. The aim of this study was to perform simultaneous analyses of serum, mucosal, and fecal anti-TNF-α levels.

Consecutive IBD patients who received maintenance anti-TNF-α therapy were enrolled. The number of TNF-α positive cells in the mucosa was detected using immunofluorescent labeling on biopsy samples. Serum, mucosal and fecal anti-TNF-α, serum anti-drug antibody, and fecal calprotectin levels were determined using ELISA. Each patient underwent body composition analysis as well.

Data of 50 patients were analyzed. The number TNF-α positive cells was significantly higher in the inflamed part of the colon than in the un-inflamed part of the colon. Tissue and fecal drug levels did not show any association with serum drug levels; moreover, serum anti-TNF concentration did not correlate with endoscopic activity. Mucosal anti-TNF levels were higher only in IFX-treated patients in remission and IFX-treated patients with detectable fecal anti-TNF had lower tissue drug levels. Presence of the drug in the feces was significantly different according to disease activity.

Fecal drug concentration is suggested to be a better predictor of endoscopic activity and loss of response, and fecal drug monitoring may improve the estimation accuracy of tissue drug levels.