Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents a significant disease burden marked by chronic inflammation and complications that adversely affect patients' quality of life. Effective diagnostic strategies involve clinical assessments, endoscopic evaluations, imaging studies, and biomarker testing, where early diagnosis is essential for effective management and prevention of long-term complications, highlighting the need for continual advancements in diagnostic methods. The intricate interplay between genetic factors and the outcomes of biological therapy is of critical importance. Unraveling the genetic determinants that influence responses and failures to biological therapy holds significant promise for optimizing treatment strategies for patients with IBD on biologics. Through an in-depth examination of current literature, this review article synthesizes critical genetic markers associated with therapeutic efficacy and resistance in IBD. Understanding these genetic actors paves the way for personalized approaches, informing clinicians on predicting, tailoring, and enhancing the effectiveness of biological therapies for improved outcomes in patients with IBD.

The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subsequent introduction of both anti-integrins and cytokine blockers has since expanded the biologic armamentarium. However, immunogenicity, defined as the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to the prescribed biopharmaceutical, means a significant fraction of patients exposed to biologic agents will experience a secondary loss of response to one or more of the drugs. In clinical settings, immunogenicity may be caused by several factors, both patient related (e.g., underlying chronic disease, systemic immune burden, including previous biologic therapy failure, and [epi]genetic background) and treatment related (e.g., dose and administration regimens, drug physical structure, photostability, temperature, and agitation). Here, we outline these elements in detail to enhance biopharmaceutical delivery and therapy for patients with IBD. Moreover, concurrent immunomodulator medication may reduce the risks of ADA generation, especially when using the chimeric drug infliximab. Summarizing the latest developments and knowledge in the field, this review aims to provide strategies to prevent ADA production and information on managing non-responsiveness or loss of response to biologics. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of ADAs and the critical factors influencing the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals may lead to improved health outcomes in the IBD community that may benefit both the individual patient and society through lower healthcare expenses.

A proof-of-concept study with the combination of guselkumab and golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has shown that the combination therapy resulted in greater efficacy than the individual monotherapies. The current analysis evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of guselkumab and golimumab in both the combination therapy and individual monotherapies. Blood samples were collected to evaluate serum concentrations and immunogenicity of guselkumab and golimumab. Population PK (PopPK) models were developed to assess the effects of combination therapy and other potential covariates on the PK of guselkumab and golimumab. The guselkumab PK was comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy, whereas golimumab concentrations were slightly higher with combination therapy. The anti-guselkumab antibody incidence was low with both monotherapy and combination therapy, and guselkumab immunogenicity did not impact the clearance. Conversely, the anti-golimumab antibody incidence with combination therapy was lower than that for monotherapy. PopPK analysis suggested that the slightly higher golimumab concentrations with combination therapy were partially due to lower immunogenicity and thus lower clearance with combination therapy. C-reactive protein (CRP) was also a significant covariate on golimumab clearance. The greater improvement of inflammation with combination therapy, as shown by reductions in CRP, may have also contributed to the higher golimumab concentrations. Combination therapy slightly decreased the clearance of golimumab, but not guselkumab clearance, in patients with UC. Lower immunogenicity and greater improvement of inflammation with combination therapy were potential mechanisms for slightly increased golimumab concentrations with combination therapy as compared with golimumab monotherapy.

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience a loss of effectiveness to biologic therapy (i.e., anti-TNF therapy, etc.). Therefore, in addition to the adverse effects of the treatment, these patients also face failure to achieve and maintain remission. Immunogenicity, the process of production of antibodies to biological agents, is fundamental to the evolution of loss of response to treatment in IBD patients. The presence of these antibodies in patients is linked to decreased serum drug levels and inhibited biological activity. However, immunogenicity rates exhibit significant variability across inflammatory disease states, immunoassay formats, and time periods. In this review, we aimed to elucidate the immunogenicity and immune mechanisms of antibody formation to biologics, the loss of therapy response, clinical results of biological treatment for IBD from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, as well as to summarize the most recent strategies for overcoming immunogenicity and approaches for managing treatment failure in IBD.

The GO-BACK study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (GLM) treatment withdrawal in adults with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who demonstrate inactive disease during a 10-month open-label (OL) GLM run-in.

Eligible participants received OL GLM in period 1. In period 2, participants who achieved inactive disease were randomized 1:1:1 to receive double-blind (DB) treatment with monthly placebo (PBO, treatment withdrawal) or continued GLM treatment given monthly (GLM QMT) or every 2 months (GLM Q2MT). Participants who did not have a disease flare continued DB treatment for ∼12 months. Participants with a disease flare discontinued DB treatment and resumed monthly OL GLM. Primary endpoint compared the proportion of participants without a disease flare in the continued GLM treatment groups (QMT or Q2MT) vs PBO in a multiplicity-controlled, step-down fashion. Safety follow-up continued for ∼3 months after last treatment.

A total of 188 patients, out of the 323 enrolled, were eligible for participation in period 2. Both GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT were superior to treatment withdrawal (PBO) in preventing disease flare (P < 0.001), with a treatment-difference vs PBO of 50.4% and 34.4% for the GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT groups, respectively. The time-to-first flare was significantly longer (log-rank P < 0.0001) with GLM treatment compared with PBO. Of 53 participants (in Q2MT or PBO) who had a confirmed disease flare, 51 (96.2%) attained a clinical response within 3 months of restarting OL GLM. Adverse events were consistent with the known GLM safety profile.

Among participants with active nr-axSpA who attained inactive disease after 10 months of GLM treatment, continued GLM treatment is well tolerated and provides superior protection against disease flares compared with GLM withdrawal. (EudraCT: 2015-004020-65, registered on 30 March 2022; NCT: 03253796, registered on 18 August 2017.).

Loss of response to golimumab occurs in nearly 40% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Unlike others anti-TNF, no study has reported a correlation between serum golimumab level and response to drug intensification. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of golimumab intensification and to identify the best threshold of serum golimumab before drug intensification predictive of response.

We included all consecutive patients with active UC with loss of response to golimumab in a prospective multicentric cohort study. Patients with loss of response at 50 mg q4 weeks (W) and 100 mg q4W underwent therapeutic intensification at 100 mg q4W and 100 mg q2W, respectively. Effectiveness and safety were assessed between Weeks 2 and 4 (visit 2) and between Weeks 4 and 8 (visit 3) after intensification. Serum level and anti-golimumab antibodies were evaluated at each medical visit (Lisa Tracker, Theradiag France).

A total of 47 UC patients (Female, 50%; median age, 39 years (IQR, 27-52)) treated with golimumab for a median of 20.4 weeks (IQR, 10.7-38.3) were included. The median partial Mayo score was 6 (IQR, 5-7), and the median endoscopic Mayo score was 3 (IQR, 2-3). The median golimumab serum level before intensification was 2.23 μg/mL (IQR, 1.02-3.96) and only one patient (2.1%) had anti-drug antibodies. At Visit 2 (Week 2-4), 40% patients experienced clinical response, 10% clinical remission, 33% endoscopic response and 23% endoscopic remission. At Visit 3 (Week 4-8), 44% of patients had clinical response, 22% of patients had clinical remission, 45% of patients had endoscopic response, and 41% of patients had endoscopic remission. The median golimumab levels before intensification do not differ between responders and non-responders (2.13 μg/ml (0.76-2.76) and 3.37 μg/ml (IQR, 1.08-4.67), respectively; p = 0.14) assessed at Visit 3. Golimumab intensification to 100 mg q4W (vs q2W) (OR 1.98, 95% CI [1.06-3.70]; p = 0.032) was significantly associated with clinical remission at Visit 3. Serum drug level at baseline or the presence of antidrug antibodies were not associated with clinical or endoscopic remission/response. Two serious adverse events (one infection and one UC flare) were reported during the 24-week follow-up.

In this prospective multicentric study, half of patients recaptured response following golimumab intensification in UC. Therapeutic drug monitoring did not predict response after optimisation of golimumab.

Therapeutic Abs directed toward TNF-α display significant immunogenicity in humans, frequently leading to lower serum concentrations of the Ab that are associated with lower treatment efficacy. The enhanced incidence of immunogenicity observed with this class of therapeutics may be mediated by the expression of TNF-α as a homotrimer, both as a soluble serum protein and as a membrane-associated protein (mTNF-α) on the surface of dendritic cells. The TNF-α homotrimer enables the formation of polyvalent Ab-TNF-α immune complexes (ICs) that enhance binding to FcR and neonatal FcR. Polyvalent ICs and Ab bound to mTNF-α on the surface of dendritic cells can internalize, traffic to the lysosomes, and be processed for presentation by MHC molecules. To diminish immunogenicity caused by trafficking of ICs and mTNF-α to the lysosomes, we engineered a monovalent format of adalimumab with pH-sensitive binding to TNF-α. The engineered variant, termed AF-M2637, did not cross-link TNF-α trimers and consequently formed small, nonprecipitating ICs only. AF-M2637 bound TNF-α with high affinity at pH 7.4 (EC50 = 1.1 nM) and displayed a significantly faster dissociation rate than adalimumab at pH 6.0. No immune response to AF-M2637 was detected in mice following a single i.v. dose. In contrast, rapid immunization was detected following the injection of a single i.v. dose of adalimumab, monovalent adalimumab, or the bivalent form of the pH-sensitive variant. These data suggest that ICs and mTNF-α both contribute to the immunogenicity of adalimumab in mice and provide a general strategy for engineering less immunogenic therapeutic TNF-α Abs.

Immunogenicity with formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to biologics is an important reason for treatment failure in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to assess the rate of ADA, the effect of combination therapy with immunomodulators on ADA and the influence of ADA on efficacy and safety of biologics for IBD treatment.

MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to April 2020 for trials of biologics that assessed immunogenicity. The overall certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). The primary outcome was rate of ADA. Secondary outcomes included efficacy and safety outcomes among patients with detectable versus undetectable ADA. For dichotomous outcomes, pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Data from 68 studies were analyzed and 33 studies (5850 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled ADA rates for biologic monotherapy were 28.0% for infliximab, 7.5% for adalimumab, 3.8% for golimumab, 10.9% for certolizumab, 6.2% for ustekinumab and 16.0% for natalizumab. Pooled ADA rates were 8.4% for vedolizumab and 5.0% for etrolizumab for combo- and monotherapy combined. In all biologics, ADA rates were underestimated by use of drug-sensitive ADA assays and higher dose and/or frequency. ADA rate was significantly reduced in patients treated with combination therapy for infliximab (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.44-0.62), adalimumab (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.14-0.69), golimumab (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.10-0.83), certolizumab pegol (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14-0.67) and natalizumab (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.11-0. 39). ADA to infliximab were associated with lower clinical response rates (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.91) and higher rates of infusion reactions (RR 2.36; 95% CI 1.85-3.01).

Differences in analytical methods to detect ADA hamper comparison of true ADA rates across biologics in IBD. Use of combination therapy with immunomodulators appeared to reduce ADA positivity for most biologics. For infliximab, ADA were associated with reduced drug efficacy and increased adverse events.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and its overexpression has been implicated in the pathophysiology of several chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Biological therapies, like TNF inhibitors, have been revolutionizing the course of these disorders. Golimumab is a transgenic anti-TNF monoclonal antibody that acts primarily by targeting and neutralizing TNF, thus preventing inflammation. It is approved for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Nonradiographic axial Spondyloarthritis, Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, and Ulcerative Colitis. Clinical trials are also being conducted in other conditions. This review charts the clinical development of golimumab and outlines the data that support its potential use across several Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease characterized by progressive loss of pancreatic beta cells. Golimumab is a human monoclonal antibody specific for tumor necrosis factor α that has already been approved for the treatment of several autoimmune conditions in adults and children. Whether golimumab could preserve beta-cell function in youth with newly diagnosed overt (stage 3) type 1 diabetes is unknown.

In this phase 2, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial, we randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, children and young adults (age range, 6 to 21 years) with newly diagnosed overt type 1 diabetes to receive subcutaneous golimumab or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was endogenous insulin production, as assessed according to the area under the concentration-time curve for C-peptide level in response to a 4-hour mixed-meal tolerance test (4-hour C-peptide AUC) at week 52. Secondary and additional end points included insulin use, the glycated hemoglobin level, the number of hypoglycemic events, the ratio of fasting proinsulin to C-peptide over time, and response profile.

A total of 84 participants underwent randomization - 56 were assigned to the golimumab group and 28 to the placebo group. The mean (±SD) 4-hour C-peptide AUC at week 52 differed significantly between the golimumab group and the placebo group (0.64±0.42 pmol per milliliter vs. 0.43±0.39 pmol per milliliter, P<0.001). A treat-to-target approach led to good glycemic control in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups in glycated hemoglobin level. Insulin use was lower with golimumab than with placebo. A partial-remission response (defined as an insulin dose-adjusted glycated hemoglobin level score [calculated as the glycated hemoglobin level plus 4 times the insulin dose] of ≤9) was observed in 43% of participants in the golimumab group and in 7% of those in the placebo group (difference, 36 percentage points; 95% CI, 22 to 55). The mean number of hypoglycemic events did not differ between the trial groups. Hypoglycemic events that were recorded as adverse events at the discretion of investigators were reported in 13 participants (23%) in the golimumab group and in 2 (7%) of those in the placebo group. Antibodies to golimumab were detected in 30 participants who received the drug; 29 had antibody titers lower than 1:1000, of whom 12 had positive results for neutralizing antibodies.

Among children and young adults with newly diagnosed overt type 1 diabetes, golimumab resulted in better endogenous insulin production and less exogenous insulin use than placebo. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; T1GER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02846545.).

Immunogenicity is recognized as a possible clinical risk due to the development of anti drug antibodies (ADAs) that can adversely impact drug safety and efficacy. Although robust assays are currently used to assess the ADA, there is a debate on how best to generate the most appropriate immunogenicity data. There are several factors that can trigger ADA formation including the immunity status of the target population and the severity of the disease indication. Immunogenicity testing has defaulted to the most conservative approach regardless of the inherent risk of the molecule or the patient population. For low-risk biotherapeutics such as human monoclonal antibodies, ADA data that provide clinically relevant information should be prioritized when establishing immunogenicity monitoring plans.

Long-term safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of open-label golimumab therapy in children with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis were evaluated.

Week-6 golimumab responders (Mayo score decrease of ≥30% and ≥3 points from baseline, rectal bleeding subscore of 0/1 or ≥1 decrease from baseline) entered the long-term extension at week 14 and received maintenance therapy (subcutaneous, q4w). Patients ≥45 kg could receive at-home treatments at week 18. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy results were summarized through week 126 (2 years).

Among 35 enrolled children, 21 (60%) responded at week 6 and 20 entered the long-term extension (median age of 14.5 years and median weight of 46.1 kg). Eleven of 20 patients (55%) completed 2 years of treatment. No anaphylactic or serum sickness-like reactions, opportunistic infections, malignancies, tuberculosis, or deaths occurred. The safety profile of golimumab from weeks 14 through 126 and that observed through week 14 was generally consistent. Median trough golimumab concentrations in evaluable patients were consistent from weeks 14 (1.39, interquartile range 0.67-3.60) through 102 (1.18, 0.78-2.16), but higher at week 110 (4.10, 1.30-4.81). The incidence of antigolimumab antibodies increased from 10% (2/20) at week 30 to 25.0% (5/20) at week 126; 1 patient had neutralizing antibodies. At week 110, 50% (10/20) of patients were in remission (ie, Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index <10). Among all enrolled patients, 28.6% (10/35) achieved remission at week 110.

Among children with ulcerative colitis who initially responded to golimumab induction and received q4w maintenance treatment in the long-term extension, 50% showed continued clinical benefit through 2 years. No new safety signals were observed.

Significant associations between serum golimumab concentrations and favourable outcomes have been observed during both induction and maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, data regarding optimal therapeutic serum golimumab concentration thresholds are limited.

To identify optimal serum golimumab concentration thresholds during induction and maintenance treatment with golimumab.

GO-LEVEL was an open label, phase IV study that included a prospective cohort of UC patients commencing golimumab, as well as a cross-sectional cohort receiving maintenance treatment. Patients commencing induction for active UC (defined as a simple clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI] >5 in addition to a raised faecal calprotectin [FC] >59μg/g or, raised C-reactive protein [CRP] [>5mg/L] or, Mayo endoscopic disease activity 2 or 3) were evaluated at weeks 6, 10 and 14. Patients receiving maintenance therapy were recruited either at the point of flare or during remission. Combined clinical-biochemical remission was defined as SCCAI ≤2 and FC <250μg/g. Serum golimumab concentrations were measured using a commercially available ELISA (LISATRACKER, Theradiag).

Thirty-nine patients were included in the induction cohort, of whom 15 (38%) achieved combined clinical-biochemical remission at week 6. The median serum golimumab concentration of those in combined clinical-biochemical remission was significantly higher than those who were not (5.0 vs 3.1 μg/mL, respectively, P = 0.03). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated 3.8 μg/mL as the optimal threshold (sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.65, area under curve [AUC] 0.72, positive predictive value [PPV] 0.59 and negative predictive value [NPV] 0.79). Sixty-three patients were included in the maintenance cohort; 31 (49%) were in combined remission, 32 (51%) were not. The median serum golimumab concentration of those in combined remission was significantly higher (2.9 vs 2.1 μg/mL, respectively, P = 0.01). ROC curve analysis demonstrated 2.4 μg/mL as the optimal threshold (sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.66, AUC 0.68, PPV 0.65 and NPV 0.66).

GO-LEVEL (NCT03124121) offers further evidence regarding golimumab's exposure-response relationship. Clinicians may consider using therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise golimumab dosing aiming to achieve our suggested therapeutic thresholds of 3.8 μg/mL at week 6 and 2.4 μg/mL during maintenance.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a condition that has been rising in the number of cases around the world. Food products made from natural ingredients such as corn and common bean might serve as alternatives for the treatment of UC. This study aimed to assess the anti-inflammatory effect of the consumption of a baked corn and bean snack (CBS) in an in vivo model of UC using 2% dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) as inductor of colitis. CD-1 mice (45, n = 9/group) were randomly separated into 5 groups, treated for 6-weeks as follows: G1 (basal diet, BD), G2 (2% DSS), G3 (20 g CBS/body weight BW/day + BD), G4 (40 g CBS/BW/day + BD) and G5 (60 g CBS/BW/day + BD). BW, Disease Activity Index (DAI), and feces were collected throughout the treatment. After euthanasia, organs (spleen, liver, and colon) were excised and weighed. Feces were analyzed for β-glucuronidase (β-GLUC) activity and gas-chromatography. The colons were analyzed for histopathology, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, and gene analysis. At the end of treatments, among the DSS-induced groups, G3 exhibited the lowest BW losses (11.5%), MPO activity (10.4%) and β-GLUC (8.6%). G4 presented the lowest DAI (0.88), relative spleen weight, and histological inflammation score (p < 0.05). Compared to G2, CBS consumption significantly (p < 0.05) reduced serum TNF-α, IL-10, and MCP-1 levels. The fecal metabolome analysis ranked 9-decenoic acid, decane, and butyric acid as the main contributors of pathways associated with the β-oxidation of fatty acids. G4 showed the highest fecal/cecal contents of short-chain fatty acids among all the DSS-induced groups. For the gene expression, G4 was clustered with G1, showing a differential inhibition of the pro-inflammatory genes Il1r1, Il1a, Tlr4, Tlr2, and Tnfrsf1b. In conclusion, CBS consumption decreased the inflammatory state and reduced the expression of the IL-1 receptor, TLR, and TNF-α-associated pathways in DSS-induced UC in CD-1 mice.

Golimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-α and is indicated for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This study analyzed the population pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of golimumab and exposure-response for efficacy and safety, using data from combined Phase II/III UC studies.

Data on serum golimumab concentration following IV and subcutaneous (SC) administration were fitted simultaneously using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling for the development of a population PK model. Logistic regression models were used for assessing relationships between serum golimumab concentrations and clinical efficacy outcomes in SC induction and maintenance studies. The percentages of patients developing infections, serious infections, and serious adverse events were assessed by golimumab exposure metric quartiles.

The PK properties of golimumab are well described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Typical values of PK parameters in a 70-kg patient were clearance, 0.544 L/d; central and peripheral compartment V_d, 3.43 and 2.27 L, respectively; and intercompartmental clearance, 0.291 L/d. Golimumab t_1/2 was 10.5 days; bioavailability following SC administration was 52.2%. Body weight, anti-golimumab antibodies, serum albumin, C-reactive protein, and alkaline phosphatase affected golimumab disposition. A positive exposure-response relationship was established between golimumab concentration and efficacy outcomes. No apparent correlation between golimumab exposure and rate of infections, serious infections, or serious adverse events was observed in patients receiving golimumab 50 or 100 mg SC every 4 weeks through 1 year.

Body weight, serum albumin, and anti-golimumab antibodies explain some of the variability observed in the PK properties of golimumab, and exposure-response findings support the recommended posology of golimumab in UC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00488774, NCT00487539, and NCT00488631.