BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2026; 15(3): 122632
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.122632
Table 1 Hemodynamic phenotypes based on disturbances in arterial inflow and venous pressure
Phenotype
Arterial inflow
Venous pressure
AVPG
Typical clinical settings
Key bedside features
Normal perfusionAdequateNormalPreservedNo clinically relevant mismatch between arterial inflow and venous outflowNormal perfusion markers, preserved urine output, stable mentation, and no evolving organ dysfunction
Reduced arterial inflowDecreasedNormal or lowDecreased mainly from the arterial sideHypovolemia, cardiogenic shock, and distributive shock with impaired effective flowHypotension, low cardiac output, elevated or rising lactate, prolonged capillary refill time, oliguria
Predominant venous congestionPreserved or relatively preservedIncreasedDecreased mainly from the venous sideRight ventricular failure, pulmonary hypertension, obstructive shock, fluid overload, and over-resuscitated septic shockElevated or rising CVP, systemic venous congestion, abnormal venous Doppler or VExUS, oliguria, renal or hepatic dysfunction
Combined inflow-congestion failureDecreasedIncreasedMarkedly decreased from both sidesAdvanced heart failure, late septic shock after fluid loading, RV failure with impaired LV filling, and complex cardiopulmonary failureHypotension or low forward flow with systemic venous congestion, elevated CVP, organ dysfunction, and persistent hypoperfusion
Table 2 Bedside variables and pragmatic reassessment triggers for integrated arterial-venous perfusion gradient-based hemodynamic assessment
Domain
Bedside variable/tool
Pragmatic reassessment trigger
Clinical implication
Arterial pressureMAP, arterial waveform quality, vasopressor requirementMAP < 65 mmHg, poor arterial waveform, low diastolic pressure, or escalating vasopressor doseConfirm measurement accuracy and interpret MAP with tissue perfusion, baseline blood pressure, cardiac output, CVP, and shock phenotype. MAP alone does not confirm adequate organ perfusion
Forward flowCardiac output, LVOT-VTI, focused echocardiography, pulse pressure, ScvO2Low cardiac output or low LVOT-VTI for clinical context; low ScvO2 with persistent hypoperfusionSuggests inadequate forward flow. Reassess preload, contractility, obstruction, RV function, hemoglobin, oxygenation, and metabolic demand
Fluid responsivenessPassive leg raise or small fluid challenge with SV/CO/LVOT-VTI measurementSV/CO/LVOT-VTI increase of approximately 10%-15%Suggests that additional preload can increase forward flow. A fluid bolus should be repeated only if the patient is also fluid tolerant.
Fluid toleranceCVP trend, MAP-CVP, VExUS, RV size/function, lung ultrasound, oxygenation, fluid balanceRising CVP, falling MAP-CVP, VExUS grade 2-3, worsening RV dilation/septal shift, new or increasing bilateral B-lines, worsening oxygenation, or large positive fluid balanceSuggests limited tolerance to further fluid. Shift from “Is the patient fluid responsive?” to “Can the patient tolerate more fluid?”
Tissue perfusionLactate, CRT, mottling, skin temperature, urine output, mental statusLactate ≥ 2 mmol/L, rising or non-clearing lactate, CRT > 3 seconds, mottling, urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/hour, altered mentation, or worsening organ functionSuggests persistent hypoperfusion or metabolic stress. Reassess arterial pressure, forward flow, venous congestion, and microcirculatory coherence rather than giving fluid automatically
Flow-metabolism relationshipPv-aCO2 gap, ScvO2, lactate trendPv-aCO2 gap > 6 mmHg, especially with raised lactate or low ScvO2May suggest inadequate blood flow relative to metabolic demand. Reassess cardiac output, oxygen delivery, hemoglobin, hypoxemia, and source control
Venous pressure/AVPG surrogateCVP and MAP-CVP trendCVP > 12-15 mmHg or rising; low or falling MAP-CVP, especially < 50 mmHg with organ dysfunctionSuggests venous back-pressure may be contributing to organ dysfunction. Assess RV function, VExUS, intra-abdominal pressure, ventilator pressures, and fluid balance
Venous congestion ultrasoundIVC, hepatic, portal, and intrarenal venous Doppler; VExUS scoreDilated IVC with abnormal venous Doppler, portal pulsatility > 30%, discontinuous or monophasic intrarenal venous flow, or VExUS grade 2-3Supports clinically relevant venous congestion. Avoid unnecessary fluid loading and consider venous-pressure reduction when perfusion pressure is supportable
Right ventricular assessmentFocused echocardiography: RV size/function, RV:LV ratio, septal motion, TAPSE, S′, TRRV dilation, RV:LV ratio > 1, septal flattening/shift, TAPSE < 17 mm, S′ < 9.5 cm/seconds, significant TR, or pulmonary pressure overloadSuggests RV-mediated venous hypertension or combined inflow-congestion failure. Avoid blind fluid loading; optimize RV preload, afterload, contractility, and systemic pressure
Extrinsic contributors to venous pressurePEEP, auto-PEEP, dynamic hyperinflation, intra-abdominal pressure, tamponade or tension physiologyHigh PEEP or auto-PEEP, intra-abdominal pressure ≥ 12 mmHg, tamponade physiology, tension pneumothorax, or abdominal compartment physiologyThese factors can raise venous pressure and impair organ drainage despite acceptable MAP. Correcting the driver may improve the effective AVPG
Pulmonary fluid toleranceLung ultrasound B-lines, oxygenation, ventilatory requirement, and EVLW where transpulmonary thermodilution is availableNew or increasing bilateral B-lines after fluid, worsening oxygenation, or rising EVLW or increasing ventilatory supportSuggests reduced pulmonary fluid tolerance. B-lines should not be interpreted as systemic venous congestion alone but should prompt reassessment before further fluid administration. Where transpulmonary thermodilution is available, extravascular lung water may provide additional quantitative information on pulmonary fluid accumulation and fluid tolerance, but it should be interpreted as an adjunct rather than a direct measure of systemic venous congestion
Residual microcirculatory dysfunctionPersistent CRT delay, mottling, lactate non-clearance, oliguria, altered mentation, or organ dysfunction despite corrected macrocirculationPersistent hypoperfusion despite MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, adequate or improved forward flow, and no major venous congestionSuggests possible loss of hemodynamic coherence. Reassess source control, oxygen delivery, hemoglobin, hypoxemia, acidosis, temperature, excessive vasoconstriction, and inflammatory or metabolic injury


Write to the Help Desk