Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2026; 15(3): 122632
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.122632
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.122632
Table 1 Hemodynamic phenotypes based on disturbances in arterial inflow and venous pressure
| Phenotype | Arterial inflow | Venous pressure | AVPG | Typical clinical settings | Key bedside features |
| Normal perfusion | Adequate | Normal | Preserved | No clinically relevant mismatch between arterial inflow and venous outflow | Normal perfusion markers, preserved urine output, stable mentation, and no evolving organ dysfunction |
| Reduced arterial inflow | Decreased | Normal or low | Decreased mainly from the arterial side | Hypovolemia, cardiogenic shock, and distributive shock with impaired effective flow | Hypotension, low cardiac output, elevated or rising lactate, prolonged capillary refill time, oliguria |
| Predominant venous congestion | Preserved or relatively preserved | Increased | Decreased mainly from the venous side | Right ventricular failure, pulmonary hypertension, obstructive shock, fluid overload, and over-resuscitated septic shock | Elevated or rising CVP, systemic venous congestion, abnormal venous Doppler or VExUS, oliguria, renal or hepatic dysfunction |
| Combined inflow-congestion failure | Decreased | Increased | Markedly decreased from both sides | Advanced heart failure, late septic shock after fluid loading, RV failure with impaired LV filling, and complex cardiopulmonary failure | Hypotension or low forward flow with systemic venous congestion, elevated CVP, organ dysfunction, and persistent hypoperfusion |
Table 2 Bedside variables and pragmatic reassessment triggers for integrated arterial-venous perfusion gradient-based hemodynamic assessment
| Domain | Bedside variable/tool | Pragmatic reassessment trigger | Clinical implication |
| Arterial pressure | MAP, arterial waveform quality, vasopressor requirement | MAP < 65 mmHg, poor arterial waveform, low diastolic pressure, or escalating vasopressor dose | Confirm measurement accuracy and interpret MAP with tissue perfusion, baseline blood pressure, cardiac output, CVP, and shock phenotype. MAP alone does not confirm adequate organ perfusion |
| Forward flow | Cardiac output, LVOT-VTI, focused echocardiography, pulse pressure, ScvO2 | Low cardiac output or low LVOT-VTI for clinical context; low ScvO2 with persistent hypoperfusion | Suggests inadequate forward flow. Reassess preload, contractility, obstruction, RV function, hemoglobin, oxygenation, and metabolic demand |
| Fluid responsiveness | Passive leg raise or small fluid challenge with SV/CO/LVOT-VTI measurement | SV/CO/LVOT-VTI increase of approximately 10%-15% | Suggests that additional preload can increase forward flow. A fluid bolus should be repeated only if the patient is also fluid tolerant. |
| Fluid tolerance | CVP trend, MAP-CVP, VExUS, RV size/function, lung ultrasound, oxygenation, fluid balance | Rising CVP, falling MAP-CVP, VExUS grade 2-3, worsening RV dilation/septal shift, new or increasing bilateral B-lines, worsening oxygenation, or large positive fluid balance | Suggests limited tolerance to further fluid. Shift from “Is the patient fluid responsive?” to “Can the patient tolerate more fluid?” |
| Tissue perfusion | Lactate, CRT, mottling, skin temperature, urine output, mental status | Lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L, rising or non-clearing lactate, CRT > 3 seconds, mottling, urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/hour, altered mentation, or worsening organ function | Suggests persistent hypoperfusion or metabolic stress. Reassess arterial pressure, forward flow, venous congestion, and microcirculatory coherence rather than giving fluid automatically |
| Flow-metabolism relationship | Pv-aCO2 gap, ScvO2, lactate trend | Pv-aCO2 gap > 6 mmHg, especially with raised lactate or low ScvO2 | May suggest inadequate blood flow relative to metabolic demand. Reassess cardiac output, oxygen delivery, hemoglobin, hypoxemia, and source control |
| Venous pressure/AVPG surrogate | CVP and MAP-CVP trend | CVP > 12-15 mmHg or rising; low or falling MAP-CVP, especially < 50 mmHg with organ dysfunction | Suggests venous back-pressure may be contributing to organ dysfunction. Assess RV function, VExUS, intra-abdominal pressure, ventilator pressures, and fluid balance |
| Venous congestion ultrasound | IVC, hepatic, portal, and intrarenal venous Doppler; VExUS score | Dilated IVC with abnormal venous Doppler, portal pulsatility > 30%, discontinuous or monophasic intrarenal venous flow, or VExUS grade 2-3 | Supports clinically relevant venous congestion. Avoid unnecessary fluid loading and consider venous-pressure reduction when perfusion pressure is supportable |
| Right ventricular assessment | Focused echocardiography: RV size/function, RV:LV ratio, septal motion, TAPSE, S′, TR | RV dilation, RV:LV ratio > 1, septal flattening/shift, TAPSE < 17 mm, S′ < 9.5 cm/seconds, significant TR, or pulmonary pressure overload | Suggests RV-mediated venous hypertension or combined inflow-congestion failure. Avoid blind fluid loading; optimize RV preload, afterload, contractility, and systemic pressure |
| Extrinsic contributors to venous pressure | PEEP, auto-PEEP, dynamic hyperinflation, intra-abdominal pressure, tamponade or tension physiology | High PEEP or auto-PEEP, intra-abdominal pressure ≥ 12 mmHg, tamponade physiology, tension pneumothorax, or abdominal compartment physiology | These factors can raise venous pressure and impair organ drainage despite acceptable MAP. Correcting the driver may improve the effective AVPG |
| Pulmonary fluid tolerance | Lung ultrasound B-lines, oxygenation, ventilatory requirement, and EVLW where transpulmonary thermodilution is available | New or increasing bilateral B-lines after fluid, worsening oxygenation, or rising EVLW or increasing ventilatory support | Suggests reduced pulmonary fluid tolerance. B-lines should not be interpreted as systemic venous congestion alone but should prompt reassessment before further fluid administration. Where transpulmonary thermodilution is available, extravascular lung water may provide additional quantitative information on pulmonary fluid accumulation and fluid tolerance, but it should be interpreted as an adjunct rather than a direct measure of systemic venous congestion |
| Residual microcirculatory dysfunction | Persistent CRT delay, mottling, lactate non-clearance, oliguria, altered mentation, or organ dysfunction despite corrected macrocirculation | Persistent hypoperfusion despite MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, adequate or improved forward flow, and no major venous congestion | Suggests possible loss of hemodynamic coherence. Reassess source control, oxygen delivery, hemoglobin, hypoxemia, acidosis, temperature, excessive vasoconstriction, and inflammatory or metabolic injury |
- Citation: Kataria S, Vinjamuri S, Juneja D, Goel S. Venous dimension of shock: Integrating arterial inflow and venous back-pressure in hemodynamic assessment. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(3): 122632
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i3/122632.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.122632