Perioperative organ injury contributes to morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. This cohort study included all elective and emergent surgeries in Germany over 4 years to address the impact of perioperative organ injuries on outcomes. We analyzed 28,350,953 cases. In-hospital mortality was 1.4% (n = 393,157), and 4.4% of cases (n = 1,245,898) experienced perioperative organ injury. Perioperative organ injury was associated with 9-fold higher odds of death and prolonged hospital stay by 11.2 days. Acute kidney injury had the highest incidence (2.0%) and was associated with 25.0% mortality. While delirium had the second highest incidence (1.5%), it was associated with the lowest mortality (10.8%). This was followed by acute myocardial infarction (incidence 0.6%, mortality 15.6%), stroke (incidence 0.6%, mortality 13.1%), pulmonary embolism (incidence 0.3%, mortality 20.0%), liver injury (incidence 0.1%, mortality 68.7%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (incidence 0.1%, mortality 44.7%). These findings help prioritize interventions for preventing or treating individual types of perioperative organ injury.

This article provides an in-depth review of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts for managing hydrocephalus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, with a focus on advanced surgical techniques and strategies to prevent complications. It examines the placement of ventricular, lumbar, peritoneal, atrial, and pleural catheters, highlighting the benefits of neuro-navigation, endoscopic visualization, and laparoscopic-assisted approaches. Evidence-based methods to reduce shunt infections, malfunctions, and overdrainage are discussed, along with a comparative analysis of shunt types tailored to individual patient needs. The article also explores innovations such as programmable valves, antimicrobial coatings, and transesophageal echocardiography, offering insights into future directions for optimizing CSF shunting outcomes.

Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) is the most prevalent vascular complication following surgical procedures. Although the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) is widely used to predict postoperative cardiovascular complications, its predictive accuracy is suboptimal.

Considering genetic influences may improve risk prediction. The authors propose integrating polygenic risk scores (PRS) with the RCRI to enhance MINS prediction. Identification of PRS associated with MINS could provide pathophysiological insights.

This is a case-control study nested within the Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Participants Cohort Evaluation cohort, including patients aged 45 and above who underwent noncardiac surgery. Daily troponin levels were measured preoperatively and on days 1, 2, and 3 postoperatively. PRS was computed for MINS risk factors using publicly available summary statistics. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between each PRS and MINS. PRS discrimination was assessed independently and in combination with RCRI.

A total of 253 MINS cases were matched with 253 controls, adjusted for age, sex, and limited to individuals of European ancestry (ntotal = 506). The type II diabetes (T2D) PRS (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.00-1.58; P = 0.047) and the HbA1c PRS (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.03-1.54; P = 0.026) were associated with MINS. No other PRS, including those for coronary artery disease, stroke, and lipid biomarkers, showed significant associations.

The T2D PRS and the HbA1c PRS were associated with an increased risk of MINS. The findings may reflect the multifactorial pathophysiology of MINS. Larger genetic studies and trials evaluating perioperative glucose management warrant consideration.

Background and AimThe aim of this study is to estimate the incidence of periprocedural outcomes after carotid revascularization with special emphasis on myocardial infarction and assess the safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsA multiple electronic search was performed in Medline (database provider PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE (database provider Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for articles from 2000 up to 2023 reporting outcomes after carotid revascularization. Randomized control trials comparing the perioperative events (30-day results) after CAS and CEA stating the perioperative risk of myocardial infarction were included in the present meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsA total of twelve randomized control trials (RCTs) with 11 153 patients were identified and considered eligible. The pooled risk of periprocedural stroke was found to be reduced after CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.6, CI 95%:1.3-2.1, P < 0.05], while PMI was found to be more frequent after CEA, favoring CAS [OR: 0.4, CI 95%: 0.2-0.7, P < 0.05]. Periprocedural mortality was lower but not reaching statistical significance in the CEA compared to CAS [OR: 1.1, CI 95%: 0.6-2.1, P = 0.68]. The pooled OR for composite endpoint of stroke, MI or death was in favor of CEA as safer treatment [OR: 1.3, CI 95%: 1-1.5, P < 0.05].ConclusionsPMI risk was lower after CAS, although the currently available data do not demonstrate any increase in mortality rates.

The effects of isolated heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) on myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) have been investigated, but the combined impact of intraoperative HR and MBP remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the influence of the heart rate-mean arterial pressure ratio (HMR) on MINS to optimize hemodynamic management.

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent general anesthesia and postoperative troponin measurements at Meizhou People's Hospital. The primary exposure was the time-weighted area above the HMR threshold (1.0) (TWAAT-HMR > 1.0), and the primary outcome was MINS within one postoperative day. The diagnostic performance of TWAAT-HMR > 1.0, the time-weighted area under MBP < 60 mmHg, and the time-weighted area above HR > 100 bpm was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Logistic regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to assess the association between HMR and MINS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to confirm the robustness of the findings, and subgroup analyses examined potential interactions with age, sex, and body mass index.

Among 699 patients, the incidence of MINS was 9.4%. TWAAT-HMR > 1.0 demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for MINS compared to time-weighted areas under/above MBP and HR (AUC: 0.708 vs. 0.646 and 0.640, respectively). TWAAT-HMR > 1.0 was identified as an independent risk factor for MINS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-2.17, p < 0.001). RCS analysis showed a linear increase in MINS risk with rising HMR (p for non-linearity = 0.507). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses supported the primary findings.

Elevated HMR is associated with a higher risk of MINS in adults undergoing general anesthesia. HMR monitoring may serve as a valuable parameter for optimizing perioperative hemodynamic management.

There is mounting and convincing evidence that patients with postoperative troponin elevation, with or without any clinical symptoms, are at higher risk for both, short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) is a relatively newly described syndrome, and the pathogenesis is not fully understood yet. MINS is now an established syndrome and multiple guidelines address potential etiologies, triggers, as well as preventive and management strategies.

Surveillance in high-risk patients is required, as most MINS would otherwise be missed. There is no reliable and established preventive strategy, but several potentially avoidable triggers like hypotension, pain and anemia have been identified. Managing patients with MINS postoperatively includes minimizing triggers (such as hemodynamic abnormalities and anemia) that can continue the damage. Long-term pharmacologic strategies include beta-blockers, statins, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulation.

MINS affects up to 20% of surgical patients, remains clinically mostly silent, but is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. A multidisciplinary approach, that includes involvement of anesthesiologists, for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of MINS is recommended.

Background: Currently, recommended pre-operative risk assessment models including the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) are not very effective in predicting postoperative myocardial damage after non-elective surgery, especially for elderly patients. Aims: This study aimed to create a new risk prediction model to assess myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) in elderly patients and compare it with the RCRI, a well-known pre-operative risk prediction model. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 370 elderly patients who were over 65 years of age and had non-elective surgery in a tertiary hospital. Each patient underwent detailed physical evaluations before the surgery. The study cohort was divided into two groups: patients who had MINS and those who did not. Results: In total, 13% (48 out of 370 patients) of the patients developed MINS. Multivariable analysis revealed that creatinine, lymphocyte, aortic regurgitation (moderate-severe), stroke, hemoglobin, ejection fraction, and D-dimer were independent determinants of MINS. By using these parameters, a model called "CLASHED" was developed to predict postoperative MINS. The ROC analysis comparison demonstrated that the new risk prediction model was significantly superior to the RCRI in predicting MINS in elderly patients undergoing non-elective surgery (AUC: 0.788 vs. AUC: 0.611, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study shows that the new risk preoperative model successfully predicts MINS in elderly patients undergoing non-elective surgery. In addition, this new model is found to be superior to the RCRI in predicting MINS.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the life saving therapeutic option for patients with acute and chronic end stage liver disease. This is a routine procedure with excellent outcomes in terms of patient survival and quality of life post LT. Orthotopic LT (OLT) patients require a critical care as they are prone to variety of post-operative vascular, cardiovascular, biliary, pulmonary and abdominal complications. Thrombotic complications (both arterial and venous) are not uncommon post liver transplant surgery. Such vascular problems lead to increased morbidity and mortality in both donor and graft recipient. Although thromboprophylaxis is recommended in general surgery patients, no such standards exist for liver transplant patients. Drastic advancements of surgical and anesthetic procedures have improvised survival rates of patients post OLT. Despite these, haemostatic imbalance leading to thrombotic events post OLT cause significant graft loss and morbidity and even lead to patient's death. Thus it is extremely important to understand pathophysiology of thrombosis in LT patients and shorten the timing of its diagnosis to avoid morbidity and mortality in both donor and graft recipient. Present review summarizes the current knowledge of vascular complications associated with LT to highlight their impact on short and long-term morbidity and mortality post LT. Also, present report discusses the lacunae existing in the literature regarding the risk factors leading to arterial and venous thrombosis in LT patients.

Background and Objectives: This study explored the effect of paired remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), involving both recipients and living donors, on cardiovascular stress in recipients after living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). The analysis included an assessment of the impact on cardiovascular biomarkers and post-transplant cardiovascular clinical events. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of 520 adult LDKT patients was conducted, employing propensity score matching (PSM) to analyze perioperative factors. The patients were allocated to no-RIPC (n = 260) and paired-RIPC (n = 260) groups. The two groups were compared with respect to high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, corrected QT (QTc) intervals, the occurrence of arrhythmia, and the requirement for cardiovascular interventions. Results: After PSM, there were no significant differences in perioperative parameters between the no-RIPC and paired-RIPC groups. However, on postoperative day (POD) 1, higher hsTnI levels and QTc interval prolongation, as well as higher incidences of arrhythmia and the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were determined in the no-RIPC group than in the paired-RIPC group. The associations between paired RIPC and improved cardiovascular outcomes were significant, including reduced odds of elevated hsTnI levels, QTc prolongation, and arrhythmia. The no-RIPC group also had longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and higher rates of rescue dialysis. Conclusions: Paired-RIPC involving recipients and donors effectively reduces cardiovascular stress markers and improves postoperative cardiovascular outcomes in LDKT recipients, underscoring its potential as a protective strategy against perioperative cardiovascular risks.

We assessed the safety of general thoracic surgery in patients with prior coronary stents undergoing lung resection, based on differences in perioperative antiplatelet therapy management.

We retrospectively examined 150 patients with coronary artery stents who underwent pulmonary resection between July 2009 and July 2018. The impact of the antiplatelet agent on thoracic surgery safety was assessed by comparing perioperative outcomes, including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, among the discontinued antiplatelet therapy (group D), heparin bridging (group H), and continuous antiplatelet therapy (group C) groups.

Groups D, H, and C included twenty-four, eighty-four, and forty-two patients, respectively. Second-generation drug-eluting stents were used in > 50% of the patients. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, or operative duration. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in four (2.7%) patients, which was comparable among the groups. In group H, postoperative heart failure and transient ischemic attack with stroke occurred in one patient each. Major bleeding occurred in two (4.7%) patients in group C.

Pulmonary resection surgical outcomes in patients with coronary artery stents were feasible regardless of antiplatelet therapy continuation. However, discontinuing dual-antiplatelet or single-antiplatelet therapy in such patients may be reasonable because this generation of drug-eluting stents has a higher safety profile than bare-metal and first-generation drug-eluting stents.

As a non-invasive coronary functional examination, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) showed predictive value in several non-cardiac surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of CT-FFR in lung cancer surgery.

We retrospectively collected 227 patients from January 2017 to June 2022 and used machine learning-based CT-FFR to evaluate the stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. The major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as perioperative myocardial injury (PMI), myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial and ventricular arrhythmia with hemodynamic disorder, cardiogenic shock and cardiac death. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for MACE and PMI. The discriminative capacity, goodness-of-fit, and reclassification improvement of prediction model were determined before and after the addition of CT-FFR≤0.8.

The incidence of MACE was 20.7 % and PMI was 15.9 %. CT-FFR significantly outperformed CCTA in terms of accuracy for predicting MACE (0.737 vs 0.524). In the multivariate regression analysis, CT-FFR≤0.8 was an independent risk factor for both MACE [OR=10.77 (4.637, 25.016), P<0.001] and PMI [OR=8.255 (3.372, 20.207), P<0.001]. Additionally, we found that the performance of prediction model for both MACE and PMI improved after the addition of CT-FFR.

CT-FFR can be used to assess the risk of perioperative MACE and PMI in patients with stable CAD undergoing lung cancer surgery. It adds prognostic information in the cardiac evaluation of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Postoperative myocardial infarction (POMI) is associated with major surgeries and remains the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in people undergoing vascular surgery, with an incidence rate ranging from 5% to 20%. Preoperative coronary interventions, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), may help prevent acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major vascular surgery when used in addition to routine perioperative drugs (e.g. statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antiplatelet agents), CABG by creating new blood circulation routes that bypass the blockages in the coronary vessels, and PCI by opening up blocked blood vessels. There is currently uncertainty around the benefits and harms of preoperative coronary interventions.

To assess the effects of preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.

We searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS, and CINAHL EBSCO on 13 March 2023. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov.

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that compared the use of preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care versus usual care for preventing acute myocardial infarction during major open vascular or endovascular surgery. We included participants of any sex or any age undergoing major open vascular surgery, major endovascular surgery, or hybrid vascular surgery.

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes of interest were acute myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and adverse events resulting from preoperative coronary interventions. Our secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, quality of life, vessel or graft secondary patency, and length of hospital stay. We reported perioperative and long-term outcomes (more than 30 days after intervention). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

We included three RCTs (1144 participants). Participants were randomised to receive either preoperative coronary revascularisation with PCI or CABG plus usual care or only usual care before major vascular surgery. One trial enrolled participants if they had no apparent evidence of coronary artery disease. Another trial selected participants classified as high risk for coronary disease through preoperative clinical and laboratorial testing. We excluded one trial from the meta-analysis because participants from both the control and the intervention groups were eligible to undergo preoperative coronary revascularisation. We identified a high risk of performance bias in all included trials, with one trial displaying a high risk of other bias. However, the risk of bias was either low or unclear in other domains. We observed no difference between groups for perioperative acute myocardial infarction, but the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 4.57; 2 trials, 888 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One trial showed a reduction in incidence of long-term (> 30 days) acute myocardial infarction in participants allocated to the preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care group, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.28; 1 trial, 426 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was little to no effect on all-cause mortality in the perioperative period when comparing the preoperative coronary intervention plus usual care group to usual care alone, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.04; 2 trials, 888 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of preoperative coronary interventions on long-term (follow up: 2.7 to 6.2 years) all-cause mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.80; 2 trials, 888 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study reported no adverse effects related to coronary angiography, whereas the other two studies reported five deaths due to revascularisations. There may be no effect on cardiovascular mortality when comparing preoperative coronary revascularisation plus usual care to usual care in the short term (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.32; 1 trial, 426 participants; low-certainty evidence). Preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care in the short term may reduce length of hospital stay slightly when compared to usual care alone (mean difference -1.17 days, 95% CI -2.05 to -0.28; 1 trial, 462 participants; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence due to concerns about risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. None of the included trials reported on quality of life or vessel graft patency at either time point, and no study reported on adverse effects, cardiovascular mortality, or length of hospital stay at long-term follow-up.

Preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care may have little or no effect on preventing perioperative acute myocardial infarction and reducing perioperative all-cause mortality compared to usual care, but the evidence is very uncertain. Similarly, limited, very low-certainty evidence shows that preoperative coronary interventions may have little or no effect on reducing long-term all-cause mortality. There is very low-certainty evidence that preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care may prevent long-term myocardial infarction, and low-certainty evidence that they may reduce length of hospital stay slightly, but not cardiovascular mortality in the short term, when compared to usual care alone. Adverse effects of preoperative coronary interventions were poorly reported in trials. Quality of life and vessel or graft patency were not reported. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence most frequently for high risk of bias, inconsistency, or imprecision. None of the analysed trials provided significant data on subgroups of patients who could potentially experience more substantial benefits from preoperative coronary intervention (e.g. altered ventricular ejection fraction). There is a need for evidence from larger and homogeneous RCTs to provide adequate statistical power to assess the role of preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.

Both dental and cardiovascular disease are prevalent in the general population, have common risk factors and may be closely associated.Following cardiothoracic surgery, patients may be higher risk for developing infective endocarditis (IE) than the general population. Before cardiothoracic interventions, it is common practice for a dental assessment to be carried out and any necessary dental treatment provided. This aims to reduce the risk of IE arising from dental sources and avoid dental pain or infection during the peri- and post-operative period. There is little guidance on which treatments should be performed and when.Many patients with cardiac disease may have dental treatment provided safely in primary care. However, there is often a need to consider additional factors, including bleeding risk, condition stability or medication interactions. Dental teams must have an awareness of the implications of cardiac disease and provide reasonable adjustments to care provision where necessary, ensuring patient safety.This article proposes a protocol for dental management of patients awaiting cardiothoracic surgery and explores important considerations for dental care in this patient group.

Most cancer patients require surgery for diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluated whether cancer is a risk factor for perioperative arterial ischaemic events.

The primary cohort included patients registered in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) between 2006 and 2016. The secondary cohort included Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) claims data from 11 US states between 2016 and 2018. Study populations comprised patients who underwent inpatient (NSQIP, HCUP) or outpatient (NSQIP) surgery. Study exposures were disseminated cancer (NSQIP) and all cancers (HCUP). The primary outcome was a perioperative arterial ischaemic event, defined as myocardial infarction or stroke diagnosed within 30 days after surgery.

Among 5 609 675 NSQIP surgeries, 2.2% involved patients with disseminated cancer. The perioperative arterial ischaemic event rate was 0.96% among patients with disseminated cancer vs. 0.48% among patients without (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-2.13). In Cox analyses adjusting for demographics, functional status, comorbidities, surgical specialty, anesthesia type, and clinical factors, disseminated cancer remained associated with higher risk of perioperative arterial ischaemic events (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.28-1.46). Among 1 341 658 surgical patients in the HCUP cohort, 11.8% had a diagnosis of cancer. A perioperative arterial ischaemic event was diagnosed in 0.74% of patients with cancer vs. 0.54% of patients without cancer (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27-1.43). In Cox analyses adjusted for demographics, insurance, comorbidities, and surgery type, cancer remained associated with higher risk of perioperative arterial ischaemic events (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.21-1.42).

Cancer is an independent risk factor for perioperative arterial ischaemic events.

Multiple studies have shown that external stenting (ExSt) mitigates the progression of vein graft disease years after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We used computed tomography to evaluate the effect of ExSt on perioperative vein graft patency.

This study assessed graft patency rates of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in consecutive patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2018 and 2021. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes of supported and non-supported groups at both patient and graft levels, with age, EuroSCORE II, gender, diabetes and arterial grafts as covariates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different covariates. The goal of the study was to provide valuable insights into the clinical outcomes of SVG in patients having CABG.

The study examined a total of 357 patients who met the inclusion criteria and evaluated 572 vein grafts. Of these, 150 patients (205 SVGs) received ExSt, whereas 207 patients (337 SVGs) did not receive ExSt. The study results indicated that the likelihood of overall SVG patency at discharge was higher in the stented group than in the non-stented group, both at the level of the grafts [93.8% vs 87.8%, odds ratio (OR) 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-4.5; P = 0.05] and at the patient level (90.1% vs 83.5%, OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.9-3.6; P = 0.1). It is worth noting that the difference between the stented and non-stented groups was most significant in the subgroup that received 2 arterial grafts (96.5% vs 89.6%, OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2-8.4; P = 0.02) and in the subgroup with a higher EuroSCORE II (median >1.1) (98.6% vs 88.6%, OR 8.8; 95% CI 1.1-72.7; P = 0.04).

The ExSt is associated with improved perioperative SVG patency at both the graft and the patient levels. Moreover, SVGs to the right territory and high-risk patients appear to have an advantage using ExSt.

Postoperative myocardial injury (PMI) is associated with morbidity and mortality, but the aetiology remains unclear. We studied whether PMI is associated with perioperative systemic inflammation. The objective is the examination of the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers (Interleukin 6[IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP]) and PMI, detected by elevated cardiac troponin (cTn), in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

This prospective, single-center, observational cohort study included 54 patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic surgery between March 2018 and April 2021. Patients were routinely treated with aspirin. IL-6 and CRP were measured preoperatively, directly after surgery, 24 hr and 48 hr postoperatively. The primary outcome was cTn release assessed by a fifth-generation high-sensitive cTn assay. Multivariable generalized linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between inflammatory biomarkers and cTn concentrations.

Fifteen patients (27.8%) developed PMI. IL-6 directly and 24 hr postoperatively was associated with elevated cTn concentrations (1.28 [1.07-1.54], P = 0.009) and 1.75 [1.18-2.59], P = 0.006, respectively). Also, CRP directly and 24 hr postoperatively was associated with elevated cTn concentrations (1.25 [1.06-1.47], P = 0.009) and 1.61 [1.1-2.33], P = 0.013, respectively). No association was found between IL-6 or CRP and cTn concentrations when measured at 48 hr postsurgery.

Biomarkers of inflammation are associated with elevated postoperative cTn concentrations in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

Assay-specific increases in circulating cardiac troponin are observed in 20-40% of patients after noncardiac surgery, depending on patient age, type of surgery, and comorbidities. Increased cardiac troponin is consistently associated with excess morbidity and mortality after noncardiac surgery. Despite these findings, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. The majority of interventional trials have been designed on the premise that ischaemic cardiac disease drives elevated perioperative cardiac troponin concentrations. We consider data showing that elevated circulating cardiac troponin after surgery could be a nonspecific marker of cardiomyocyte stress. Elevated concentrations of circulating cardiac troponin could reflect coordinated pathological processes underpinning organ injury that are not necessarily caused by ischaemia. Laboratory studies suggest that matching of coronary artery autoregulation and myocardial perfusion-contraction coupling limit the impact of systemic haemodynamic changes in the myocardium, and that type 2 ischaemia might not be the likeliest explanation for cardiac troponin elevation in noncardiac surgery. The perioperative period triggers multiple pathological mechanisms that might cause cardiac troponin to cross the sarcolemma. A two-hit model involving two or more triggers including systemic inflammation, haemodynamic strain, adrenergic stress, and autonomic dysfunction might exacerbate or initiate acute myocardial injury directly in the absence of cell death. Consideration of these diverse mechanisms is pivotal for the design and interpretation of interventional perioperative trials.

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the 2017 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines on troponin surveillance after noncardiac surgery.

This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational study. Patients aged 40 yr or older undergoing intermediate- to high-risk elective noncardiac surgery between 2016 and 2021 were included. We compared the number and percentage of troponin tests ordered before and after the guidelines were published and compared patient characteristics, specifically cardiovascular comorbidity, using odds ratio's (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes were myocardial injury, myocardial infarction (MI), and in-hospital mortality.

The cohort included 36,386 patients and the median age was 63 yr. Between 2016 and 2018, troponin surveillance was done in 2,461 (13%) of the 19,046 patients, compared with 2,398 (14%) of the 17,340 patients who had surgery between 2019 and 2021 (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.15). Patients who had surgery in the second period had less cardiovascular comorbidity; the adjusted OR for troponin surveillance was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.21). In the two periods, troponin was elevated in 561 (2.9%) and 470 (2.7%) patients, an MI was documented in 54 (0.3%) and 36 (0.2%) patients, and 95 (0.5%) and 73 (0.4%) patients died, respectively. After adjustment for baseline differences in the two periods, the ORs for MI and mortality were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.27) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.19), respectively.

Although the odds of troponin ordering were slightly but significantly higher after publication of the CCS guidelines, the odds for detecting an MI and for mortality did not change.

Even though medication and interventional therapy have improved the death rate for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients, these patients still have a substantial residual risk of cardiovascular events. Early identification of high-risk individuals is critical for improving prognosis, especially in this patient group. The focus of recent research has switched to finding new related indicators that can help distinguish high-risk patients. For this purpose, we examined the relationship between the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) defined by the SYNTAX score (SxS) in NSTEMI patients.

Based on the SxS, CAD patients were split into three groups. To evaluate the risk variables of CAD, multivariate logistic analysis was employed.

The PIV (odds ratio: 1.003; 95% CI: 1.001-1.005; p = 0.005) was found to be an independent predictor of a high SxS in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Additionally, there was a positive association between the PIV and SxS (r: 0.68; p < 0.001). The PIV predicted the severe coronary lesion in the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 81.1%, using an appropriate cutoff value of 568.2.

In patients with non-STEMI, the PIV, a cheap and easily measured laboratory variable, was substantially correlated with a high SxS and the severity of CAD.

Postoperative myocardial injury (PMI) comprises a spectrum of mechanisms resulting in troponin release. The impact of different PMI phenotypes on postoperative disability remains unknown.

This was a multicentre prospective cohort study including patients aged ≥50 yr undergoing elective major noncardiac surgery. Patients were stratified in five groups based on the occurrence of PMI and clinical information on postoperative adverse events: PMI classified as myocardial infarction (MI; according to fourth definition), PMI plus adverse event other than MI, clinically silent PMI (PMI without adverse events), adverse events without PMI, and neither PMI nor an adverse event (reference). The primary endpoint was 6-month self-reported disability (assessed by WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [WHODAS]). Disability-free survival was defined as WHODAS ≤16%.

We included 888 patients of mean age 69 (range 53-91) yr, of which 356 (40%) were women; 151 (17%) patients experienced PMI, and 625 (71%) experienced 6-month disability-free survival. Patients with PMI, regardless of its phenotype, had higher preoperative disability scores than patients without PMI (difference in WHODAS; β: 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-6.2), but scores remained stable after surgery (β: 1.2, 95% CI: -3.2-5.6). Before surgery, patients with MI (n=36, 4%) were more disabled compared with patients without PMI and no adverse events (β: 5.5, 95% CI: 0.3-10.8). At 6 months, patients with MI and patients without PMI but with adverse events worsened in disability score (β: 11.2, 95% CI: 2.3-20.2; β: 8.1, 95% CI: 3.0-13.2, respectively). Patients with clinically silent PMI did not change in disability score at 6 months (β: 1.39, 95% CI: -4.50-7.29, P=0.642).

Although patients with postoperative myocardial injury had higher preoperative self-reported disability, disability scores did not change at 6 months after surgery. However, patients experiencing myocardial infarction worsened in disability score after surgery.

In the setting of non-cardiac surgery, cardiac complications contribute to over a third of perioperative deaths. With over 230 million major surgeries performed annually, and an increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and ischaemic heart disease, the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction is also rising. The recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on cardiovascular risk in noncardiac surgery elevated practices aiming to identify those at most risk, including biomarker monitoring and stress testing. However the current evidence base on if, and how, the risk of cardiac events can be modified is lacking. This review focuses on patient, surgical and cardiac risk assessment, as well as exploring the data on perioperative revascularization and other risk-reduction strategies.

Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is a chronic condition and an emerging health challenge, in view of the growing elderly population and the obesity epidemic. Due to a lack of awareness among treating doctors and the non-specific nauture of the associated symptoms, SO remains grossly underdiagnosed. There is no consensus yet on a standard definition or diagnostic criteria for SO, which limits the estimation of the global prevalence of this condition. It has been linked to numerous metabolic derangements, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. The treatment of SO is multimodal and requires expertise across multiple specialties. While dietary modifications and exercise regimens have shown a potential therapeutic benefit, there is currently no proven pharmacological management for SO. However, numerous drugs and the role of bariatric surgery are still under trial, and have great scope for further research. This article covers the available literature regarding the definition, diagnostic criteria, and prevalence of SO, with available evidence linking it to CVD, metabolic disease and mortality, and an overview of current directives on management.

We report the case of an elderly woman who developed recurring episodes of unexplained cardiocirculatory arrest. The index event appeared during surgery to fix a fracture of the ankle and consisted of bradypnea, hypotension and asystole, coherent with a Bezold-Jarisch-like cardioprotective reflex. Classical signs of acute myocardial infarction were absent. Yet, occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) was observed and successfully revascularized, whereupon circulatory arrests vanished. We discuss several differential diagnoses. Unexplainable circulatory failure, with sinus bradycardia and arterial hypotension, despite lack of ECG signs of ischemia or significant troponin levels, suggest the action of cardioprotective reflexes of the autonomic nervous system. Coronary artery disease is a common source. Attention to cardioprotective reflexes should be taken in the case of unexplained cardiac arrest without overt reasons. We recommend performing coronary angiography to exclude significant coronary stenosis.

Frailty is a complex and multisystem biological process characterized by reductions in physiological reserve. It is an increasingly common phenomena in the surgical population, and significantly impacts postoperative recovery. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of frailty, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations for frailty care. We will also discuss the different models of postoperative care, including enhanced recovery pathways, as well as elective critical care admission. With discoveries of new effective interventions, and advances in healthcare information technology, optimized pathways could be developed to provide the best care possible that meets the challenges of perioperative frailty.

Background: Perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) is a life-threatening complication in major non-cardiac surgeries (NCS) and constitutes the most common cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A PMI that is associated with prolonged oxygen supply-demand imbalance and its etiology is defined as a type 2 MI. Asymptomatic myocardial ischemia can occur in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), especially those with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, or, in some cases, without any risk factors. Case: We report a case of asymptomatic PMI in a 76-year-old patient with underlying hypertension and DM without a previous history of CAD. During the induction of anesthesia, abnormal electrocardiography was discovered, and the surgery was postponed after further studies revealed almost completely occluded three-vessel CAD and type 2 PMI. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists should closely monitor and evaluate the associated cardiovascular risk, including cardiac biomarkers of each patient before surgery, to minimize the possibility of PMI.

Retrospective cohort study.

The impact of modifiable risk factors (MRFs) on complications, costs, and readmission rates at 30, 90, and 180-days following lumbar spine fusion.

Patients with lumbar spine fusions within the 2016-2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). Patients were stratified by the following MRFs: Alcohol use, tobacco/nicotine use, nutritional malnourishment, dyslipidemia, and primary hypertension. Differences in complications, non-elective readmission rates, costs, and length of stay were compared between MRFs and the non-MRF group. Statistical analysis was conducted using Tukey multiple comparisons of means, 1-way ANOVA, Wald testing, unpaired Welch 2-sample t-tests, multivariate analysis, and predictive modeling.

The final analysis included 297,579 lumbar fusion patients. At 30 and 90 days, patients with nutritional malnutrition, dyslipidemia, and primary hypertension had significantly greater readmission rates than patients without MRFs (all P<0.01). At 180-days, all MRFs had significantly greater readmission rates than the non-MRF group (all P<0.001). Dyslipidemia demonstrated significantly greater rates of myocardial infarction at 90 days compared to all groups (all P<0.02). Nutritional malnutrition was associated with a significantly greater mortality rate than primary hypertension, non-MRF, and tobacco/nicotine use at 90 days (P<0.001) and only tobacco/nicotine use at 180 days (P=0.007). Predictive modeling showed increases of 0.77%, 1.70%, and 2.44% risk of readmission at 30, 90, and 180-days respectively per additional MRF (all P<0.001).

These findings highlight the negative impact each MRF has on patients following lumbar spinal fusion. Further longitudinal research is necessary to comprehensively characterize the effects of various MRFs on spine surgery outcomes.

Perioperative myocardial infarction/injury (PMI) following non-cardiac surgery is a frequent cardiac complication. Better understanding of the underlying aetiologies and outcomes is urgently needed.

Aetiologies of PMIs detected within an active surveillance and response programme were centrally adjudicated by two independent physicians based on all information obtained during clinically indicated PMI work-up including cardiac imaging among consecutive high-risk patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery in a prospective multicentre study. PMI aetiologies were hierarchically classified into 'extra-cardiac' if caused by a primarily extra-cardiac disease such as severe sepsis or pulmonary embolism; and 'cardiac', further subtyped into type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), tachyarrhythmia, acute heart failure (AHF), or likely type 2 myocardial infarction (lT2MI). Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including acute myocardial infarction, AHF (both only from day 3 to avoid inclusion bias), life-threatening arrhythmia, and cardiovascular death as well as all-cause death were assessed during 1-year follow-up. Among 7754 patients (age 45-98 years, 45% women), PMI occurred in 1016 (13.1%). At least one MACE occurred in 684/7754 patients (8.8%) and 818/7754 patients died (10.5%) within 1 year. Outcomes differed starkly according to aetiology: in patients with extra-cardiac PMI, T1MI, tachyarrhythmia, AHF, and lT2MI 51%, 41%, 57%, 64%, and 25% had MACE, and 38%, 27%, 40%, 49%, and 17% patients died within 1 year, respectively, compared to 7% and 9% in patients without PMI. These associations persisted in multivariable analysis.

At 1 year, most PMI aetiologies have unacceptably high rates of MACE and all-cause death, highlighting the urgent need for more intensive treatments.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02573532.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is widely used as a primary treatment for urolithiasis and is performed as an elective outpatient surgical procedure because of its ease of use. However, patients undergoing this treatment rarely develop cardiac complications. In this article, we present the case of a 45-year-old male patient who presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during ESWL. Moreover, atypical symptoms and electrocardiogram patterns were recognized by the nursing staff. Early primary evaluation and intervention resulted in favorable outcomes along with patent coronary artery flow following stent placement for stenosis, and no complications were noted.

We present a unique case of a type I peri-operative myocardial infarction during an extensive abdominal aortic aneurysm repair occurring due to the occlusion of a severe stable ostial plaque stenosis by a small overlying thrombus. During coronary angiography, the thrombus was dislodged by the diagnostic catheter which restored normal flow without stent placement. We demonstrate a care approach that was carefully arrived upon through multidisciplinary management with vascular surgery and anesthesiology colleagues.

Elevated troponin (TnT) levels after open or endovascular surgical procedures have been previously shown to correlate with significantly higher postoperative and short-term mortality. The incidence of asymptomatic myocardial injury after vascular surgical procedures has also been shown to be high. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of routine postoperative TnT screening and long-term outcomes for patients with postoperative TnT elevation.

Data from consecutive patients who had undergone open or endovascular surgery on an emergent or elective basis with routine postoperative TnT testing from January 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Elevated postoperative TnT was considered >0.01 ng/mL. Patients with no documented postoperative TnT levels, those who had denied research authorization, and those with elevated TnT levels secondary to renal insufficiency alone were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they had required a dialysis access procedure, varicose vein procedure, or any procedure performed on an outpatient basis, because these were considered nonmajor surgeries. The end points were all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1, 2, 4, and 8 years postoperatively. Mortality data were retrieved from the electronic medical records and the Social Security Death Index and Accurint Death database.

During the 3-year study period, 1632 patients with postoperative TnT levels available had met the inclusion criteria (70% men; 30% women; mean age, 69.7 years). Postoperatively, 410 patients (25.1%) had had elevated TnT levels (TnT+) and 1222 (74.9%) had had nonelevated TnT levels (TnT-). Of the 410 TnT+ patients, 261 had undergone open, 143 had undergone endovascular, and 6 had undergone hybrid procedures. These included 180 aortic, 128 infrainguinal, 22 cerebrovascular, and 80 upper extremity or miscellaneous procedures. Of the 410 TnT+ patients, 168 had experienced asymptomatic myocardial injury. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher for the TnT+ patients than for the TnT- patients (3.9% vs 0.8%; P < .001). The cumulative probability of death for the TnT+ patients remained significantly higher than that for the TnT- patients at 1 (13% vs 3.2%), 2 (17.8% vs 4.8%), 4 (43% vs 18.5%), and 8 (81.4% vs 48.6%) years (P < .0001). The difference held true even for the 168 asymptomatic TnT+ patients compared with the TnT- patients at 30 days (2.4% vs 0.8%) and 1 (7.6% vs 3.2%), 2 (13.3% vs 4.8%), 4 (43.6 vs 18.5%) and 8 (80.8 vs 48.6%) years (P < .0001).

In the present study, patients with elevated TnT levels after vascular surgery had had significantly higher early and late all-cause mortality compared with those with normal postoperative TnT levels. This was true even for patients with asymptomatic TnT elevation, suggesting a role might exist for routine postoperative TnT screening to allow for long-term risk stratification and targeted medical management.

To assess the short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) associated with procedures performed at outpatient specialised hospital clinics.

In this case-crossover, population-based study, we identified first-time AMI cases aged ≥40 years via patient registries and linked them to their surgical intervention in Norway (2008-2016) and Sweden (2001-2014), respectively. The number of individuals with AMI who underwent procedures 0-7 days (hazard period) prior to the AMI diagnosis was compared with cases who were exposed 29-36 days (control period) before the AMI. A total of 6176 patients with AMI who underwent a procedure either during the defined hazard or control period contributed to the analyses. ORs with 95% CIs were computed using conditional logistic regression.

The mean age of the total population was 74.7 years and 64.6% were male. The relative risk was higher following procedures performed under general/regional anaesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy (OR_summary, 4.23, 95% CI 1.58 to 11.31), vascular (OR_summary, 3.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 8.90), urological/gynaecological (OR_summary, 2.30, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.53) and orthopaedic (OR_summary,1.78, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.44) procedures, and for ENT (ear, nose and throat) and mouth procedures (OR_summary, 1.53, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.99) performed under local anaesthesia.

This large population-based register study from two countries suggests that outpatient procedures are generally safe with regard to the postoperative risk of AMI. However, some procedures, such as gastrointestinal endoscopy, vascular procedures and urological/gynaecological procedures may increase the risk of AMI by twofold or threefold within the first 8 days after the procedures. Further studies are warranted to assess whether the effect is modified by cardiovascular medication or other clinical factors.

Conflicting results are reported about daytime variation on mortality and cardiac outcomes after non-cardiac surgeries. In this cohort study, we evaluate whether the period of the day in which surgeries are performed may influence all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac arterial vascular procedures.

1,267 patients who underwent non-cardiac arterial vascular surgeries between 2012 and 2018 were prospectively included in our cohort and categorized into two groups: morning (7 a.m. to 12 a.m., 79%) and afternoon/night (12:01 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. in the next day, 21%) surgeries. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days and one year. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of perioperative myocardial injury/infarction (PMI), and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiovascular death) at hospital discharge.

After adjusting for confounders in the multivariable Cox proportional regression, all-cause mortality rates at 30 days and one year were higher among those who underwent surgery in the afternoon/night (aHR 1.6 [95%CI 1.1-2.3], P = 0.015 and aHR 1.7 [95%CI 1.3-2.2], P < 0.001, respectively). Afternoon/night patients had higher incidence of PMI (aHR 1.4 [95%CI 1.1-1.7], P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE (aHR 1.3 [95%CI 0.9-1.7], P = 0.074).

In patients undergoing arterial vascular surgery, being operated in the afternoon/night was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality rates and incidence of perioperative myocardial injury/infarction.

Animal studies have shown that midazolam can increase vulnerability to cardiac ischemia, potentially via circadian-mediated mechanisms. We hypothesized that perioperative midazolam administration is associated with an increased incidence of myocardial injury in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (MINS) and that circadian biology may underlie this relationship.

We analyzed intraoperative data from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group for the occurrence of MINS across 50 institutions from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MINS. MINS was defined as having at least one troponin-I lab value ≥0.03 ng/ml from anesthesia start to 72 h after anesthesia end. To account for bias, propensity scores and inverse probability of treatment weighting were applied.

A total of 1,773,118 cases were available for analysis. Of these subjects, 951,345 (53.7%) received midazolam perioperatively, and 16,404 (0.93%) met criteria for perioperative MINS. There was no association between perioperative midazolam administration and risk of MINS in the study population as a whole (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, confidence interval (CI) [0.94, 1.01]). However, we found a strong association between midazolam administration and risk of MINS when surgery occurred overnight (OR 3.52, CI [3.10, 4.00]) or when surgery occurred in ASA 1 or 2 patients (OR 1.25, CI [1.13, 1.39]).

Perioperative midazolam administration may not pose a significant risk for MINS occurrence. However, midazolam administration at night and in healthier patients could increase MINS, which warrants further clinical investigation with an emphasis on circadian biology.

Postoperative myocardial injury (PMI) after major vascular surgery, detected by elevated cardiac troponin (cTn), has been associated with morbidity and mortality. It is unclear whether the pathophysiology of PMI is determined by increased platelet activity.

To examine the relationship between platelet activation (P-selectin expression) and PMI in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

This prospective, single-centre, observational, cohort study included 33 patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic surgery between March 2018 and April 2021. Patients were routinely treated with aspirin. Unstimulated platelet activation was measured by platelet bound P-selectin expression (range 0-100 %). Explorative coagulation measurements were: stimulated platelet aggregation measured with the VerifyNow® assay (aspirin cartridge), with the Multiplate® analyzer (ASPI, ADP and TRAP) and stimulated coagulation status evaluated by the TEG® Hemostasis Analyzer System (global hemostasis cartridge). The primary outcome was cTn release assessed by the fifth generation high-sensitive cTn assay. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the association between platelet function and cTn concentrations over time.

Ten patients (30.3 %) developed PMI. Increased P-selectin expression directly after surgery was associated with the cTn concentrations over 48 h (β = 1.39 (1.1-1.75), P = 0.0064). No association was found between P-selectin measured later after surgery (at 24 h or 48 h) and cTn concentrations. Furthermore, there was no association between the explorative coagulation parameters and cTn release.

Platelet reactivity, assessed by P-selectin expression measured directly after surgery is associated with PMI, assessed by elevated cTn concentrations in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

Chest pain is relatively common postoperatively. Myocardial infarction (MI) is one cause of chest pain after surgery, but chest pain also results from less severe conditions. Because of its potential severity, chest pain usually prompts the activation of Rapid Response Systems (RRS). While chest pain is a cardinal symptom of myocardial ischemia in the non-surgical setting, the significance and relevance of chest pain after noncardiac surgery remains unclear.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of noncardiac surgical inpatients for whom postoperative chest pain triggered our multidisciplinary RRS.

Surgical wards at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Postsurgical patients after noncardiac surgery in whom the RSS system was activated for chest pain.

RRS specified interventions like ECG readings, troponin measurements, transfer to ICU.

Our primary outcome was MI. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who had an ECG performed, troponin measurements, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

5850 surgical patients experienced postoperative chest pain and triggered an RRS activation between 2009 and 2019. A total of 3110 patients had troponin T measured within 6 h after RRS activation, and 538 of them (17%) had elevated troponin, meeting the Fourth Universal Definition criteria for MI. Additionally, 2 patients had ST-segment elevation infarction (STEMI) without troponin measurement. Among the 540 patients with MI, only 19 (3.5%) were diagnosed with a STEMI by ECG, 388 (72%) had echocardiography, 43 patients (8%) had cardiac catheterization, 8 patients (1.5%) required emergent cardiac surgery, and 424 (79%) were admitted to an ICU.

Chest pain is a serious clinical sign, often indicating a postoperative myocardial infarction, and therefore should be taken seriously. Troponin screening should be routinely considered in postsurgical patients who report chest pain.

Oxygen is routinely given to patients during and after surgery. Perioperative oxygen administration has been proposed as a potential strategy to prevent and treat hypoxaemia and reduce complications, such as surgical site infections, pulmonary complications and mortality. However, uncertainty exists as to which strategies in terms of amount, delivery devices and timing are clinically effective. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses is to answer the research question, 'For which types of surgery, at which stages of care, in which sub-groups of patients and delivered under what conditions are different types of perioperative oxygen therapy clinically effective?'.

We will search key electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos, PROSPERO, the INAHTA International HTA Database and DARE archives) for systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials comparing perioperative oxygen strategies. Each review will be mapped according to type of surgery, surgical pathway timepoints and clinical comparison. The highest quality reviews with the most comprehensive and up-to-date coverage of relevant literature will be chosen as anchoring reviews. Standardised data will be extracted from each chosen review, including definition of oxygen therapy, summaries of interventions and comparators, patient population, surgical characteristics and assessment of overall certainty of evidence. For clinical outcomes and adverse events, the overall pooled findings and results of subgroup and sensitivity analyses (where available) will be extracted. Trial-level data will be extracted for surgical site infections, mortality, and potential trial-level effect modifiers such as risk of bias, outcome definition and type of surgery to facilitate quantitative data analysis. This analysis will adopt a multiple indication review approach with panoramic meta-analysis using review-level data and meta-regression using trial-level data. An evidence map will be produced to summarise our findings and highlight any research gaps.

There is a need to provide a panoramic overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses describing peri-operative oxygen practice to both inform clinical practice and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty, where further research may be required. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021272361.

Preoperative cardiovascular evaluations are frequently done before ambulatory ophthalmologic procedures. However, whether these procedures can trigger an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unknown.

To assess the short-term risk for AMI associated with ophthalmologic procedures.

Case-crossover design.

Population-based nationwide study from Norway and Sweden.

First-time patients with AMI, aged 40 years and older, identified via inpatient registries and linked to outpatient surgical procedures in Norway (2008 to 2014) and Sweden (2001 to 2014), respectively.

Using self-matching, for each participant, exposure to ophthalmologic procedures in the 0 to 7 days before AMI diagnosis (hazard period) was compared with an 8-day period 30 days earlier, that is, days 29 to 36 before AMI (control period) to estimate the relative risk for an AMI the week after an ophthalmologic procedure. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated, using conditional logistic regression. Only patients who had a procedure of interest during either the hazard or control period were included.

For the 806 patients with AMI included in this study, there was a lower likelihood of AMI in the week after an ophthalmologic procedure than during the control week (OR_, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91). Furthermore, there was no evidence of increased risk for AMI when analyses were stratified by surgery subtype, anesthesia (local or general), duration, invasiveness (low, intermediate, or high), patient's age (<65 years or ≥65 years), or comorbidity (none vs. any).

Potential bias from time-varying confounders between the hazard and the control periods.

Ophthalmologic procedures done in an outpatient setting did not seem to be associated with an increased risk for AMI.

Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Swedish Research Council.