Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Urol. Sep 12, 2020; 9(1): 1-8
Published online Sep 12, 2020. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v9.i1.1
Table 1 Patient demographics and capping trial outcomes
TotalSuccessful cappingUnsuccessful capping
NUT procedures3730 (81%), 95%CI: 0.65-0.927 (19%), 95%CI: 0.80-0.35
Patients34
Gender
Male19172
Female15105
Age (yr)
Average (range)58 (2-83)59 (2-83)56 (24-73)
Underlying cancer (procedures)
Prostate: 9Prostate: 7Prostate: 2
Bladder: 5Bladder: 5
Colorectal: 5Colorectal: 5
Endometrial: 5Endometrial: 3Endometrial: 2
Breast: 2Breast: 1Breast: 1
Cervical: 2Cervical: 2
Gastric: 2Gastric: 1Gastric: 1
Neuroblastoma: 2Neuroblastoma: 2
Ovarian: 1Ovarian: 1
Renal: 1Renal: 1
Sarcoma: 1Sarcoma: 1
Testicular: 1Testicular: 1
Crohn’s: 1Crohn’s: 1
Catheter size (French)
8.514113
1023194
Catheter length (cm)
221082
2416133
26862
28220
32110
Side
Right18162
Left1064
Bilateral431
Capping length (d)
Average, Median, Range40, 24.5, 12-9412, 10, 2-22
OutcomesConversion to internal stent (n = 23); Routine exchange (n = 5); Removal (n = 1); Unrelated death (n = 1)Peri catheter leakage (n = 3); Elevated creatinine (n = 2); Fever/hematuria (n = 1); Nausea/vomiting (n = 1)