1
|
Chong B, Saad M, Chong TW, Thng J, Tan YG, Tay KJ, Cheng C, Lin PH, Teoh J, Chiu PKF, Lawrentschuk N, Eapen R, Murphy D, Chan J, Chua MLK, Tuan J, Yuen J, Kanesvaran R, Chen K. Selective treatment de-escalation in advanced prostate cancer: have we come full circle? BJU Int 2025; 135:733-740. [PMID: 39748463 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
Compelling evidence has solidified the notion of early treatment intensification in managing patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Landmark trials have provided Level 1 evidence for the survival benefits achieved by combining multiple agents. The efficacy of combined therapy relies not only on how treatment is intensified but also on how it is de-escalated. This underscores the importance of tailored treatment approaches, potentially involving a reduction in therapy for specific patients, to strike a balance between the benefits of hormonal treatment and its associated adverse effects. While de-escalation of therapy in mHSPC remains challenging due to limited evidence, it is recommended for elderly or frail patients, those with poor performance status, or experiencing significant toxicity. However, for patients with excellent prostate-specific antigen responses or favourable biomarkers, decisions should be personalised, weighing the potential benefits of continued treatment against the risk of long-term side effects, using risk stratification tools where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Chong
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marniza Saad
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Tsung Wen Chong
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - John Thng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher Cheng
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Po-Hung Lin
- Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Division of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan Murphy
- Division of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johan Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melvin L K Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeffrey Tuan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - John Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ploussard G, Dariane C, Mathieu R, Baboudjian M, Barret E, Brureau L, Fiard G, Fromont G, Olivier J, Rozet F, Peyrottes A, Renard-Penna R, Sargos P, Supiot S, Turpin L, Roubaud G, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Prostate cancer - Management of metastatic disease and castration resistance. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102710. [PMID: 39581665 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT The Oncology Committee of the French Urology Association is proposing updated recommendations for the management of recurrent and/or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A systematic review of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was conducted by the CCAFU on the therapeutic management of recurrent PCa following local or metastatic treatment, assessing the references based on their level of evidence. RESULTS Molecular imaging is the standard approach for assessing recurrence after local treatment and should not delay early salvage treatment. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the primary treatment option for metastatic PCa. Intensification of ADT, now cononsidered standard care for metastatic PCa, involves incorporating at least one new-generation hormone therapy (ARPI). For patients with high-volume metastatic disease at diagnosis, adding docetaxel to ADT+ARPI may be considered for eligible patients. In castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) patients, poly(ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and PSMA radioligand therapy are new treatment options. The combination and sequencing of treatmentsare influenced by several factors, including patient and disease characteristics, prior therapies, genomic status, and molecular imaging findings. CONCLUSION This update of French recommendations should help to improve the management recurrent or metastatic PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France; Paris University, U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, University of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (Irset), UMR_S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | - François Rozet
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Radiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Léa Turpin
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen K, Wong TH, Tan YG, Tay KJ, Tan WC, Chan J, Ho H, Cheng C, Teoh JYC, Chiu PKF, Wang HJ, Saad MB, Kanesvaran R, Li YQ, Ng CT, Tuan JKL, Yuen JSP. Cardio-oncology in advanced prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1386597. [PMID: 38947889 PMCID: PMC11211357 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1386597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Treatment intensification with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) have led to improved survival in advanced prostate cancer. However, ADT is linked to significant cardiovascular toxicity, and ARPi also negatively impacts cardiovascular health. Together with a higher prevalence of baseline cardiovascular risk factors reported among prostate cancer survivors at diagnosis, there is a pressing need to prioritise and optimise cardiovascular health in this population. Firstly, While no dedicated cardiovascular toxicity risk calculators are available, other tools such as SCORE2 can be used for baseline cardiovascular risk assessment. Next, selected patients on combination therapy may benefit from de-escalation of ADT to minimise its toxicities while maintaining cancer control. These patients can be characterised by an exceptional PSA response to hormonal treatment, favourable disease characteristics and competing comorbidities that warrant a less aggressive treatment regime. In addition, emerging molecular and genomic biomarkers hold the potential to identify patients who are suited for a de-escalated treatment approach either with ADT or with ARPi. One such biomarker is AR-V7 splice variant that predicts resistance to ARPi. Lastly, optimization of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors for patients through a coherent framework (ABCDE) and exercise therapy is equally important. This article aims to comprehensively review the cardiovascular impact of hormonal manipulation in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, propose overarching strategies to mitigate cardiovascular toxicity associated with hormonal treatment, and, most importantly, raise awareness about the detrimental cardiovascular effects inherent in our current management strategies involving hormonal agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ting Hong Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Chong Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Johan Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Henry Ho
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher Cheng
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hung Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Marniza Binti Saad
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - You Quan Li
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Choon Ta Ng
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - John Shyi Peng Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grisay G, Turco F, Litiere S, Fournier B, Patrikidou A, Gallardo E, McDermott R, Alanya A, Gillessen S, Tombal B. EORTC 2238 "De-Escalate": a pragmatic trial to revisit intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in the era of new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1391825. [PMID: 38779087 PMCID: PMC11109389 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1391825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The landscape of treating metastatic prostate cancer has evolved with the addition of Androgen Receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), significantly improving survival rates. However, prolonged use of these therapies introduces notable side effects, prompting a need to revisit intermittent treatment duration. The EORTC 2238 De-Escalate trial is a pragmatic trial seeking to reassess the role of intermittent therapy in patients undergoing maximal androgen blockade (MAB) for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC), i.e., the combination of ADT with an ARPI, with the aims of reducing side effects, enhancing Quality of Life (QoL) and optimizing resource usage, while maintaining oncological benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Grisay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centres Hospitaliers Universitaires HELORA, La Louvière, Belgium
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Saskia Litiere
- Statistics Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Béatrice Fournier
- Medical Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anna Patrikidou
- Genito-Urinary Oncology Group and Early Drug Development (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Enrique Gallardo
- Department of Oncology, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d’Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Ray McDermott
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincents University Hospital and Cancer Trials, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ahu Alanya
- Quality of Life Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Division of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Qazi SU, Altaf Z, Zafar M, Tariq MA, Khalid A, Kaleem A, Saad E, Qazi S. Development of depression in patients using androgen deprivation therapy: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Prostate 2024; 84:525-538. [PMID: 38372065 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an effective treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Multiple studies have highlighted serious consequences this therapy poses to mental health, particularly depression. We aimed to review the incidence and association between ADT in men with PCa and the risk of depression. METHODS We systematically searched multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus till August 2023 for studies that compared ADT versus control for treating PCa reporting depression as outcome. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models and results presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. RESULTS A total of 38 studies (17 retrospective studies, 16 prospective studies, two cross-sectional studies and two randomized trials) with 360,650 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The estimated pooled incidence of depression among ADT patients is 209.5 (95% CI = 122.3; 312.2) per 1000 patients. There is statistically significant relationship between ADT treatment and depression (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.28, 1.67; p = 0, I2 = 86.4%). The results remained consistent across various subgroups. No risk of publication bias was detected by funnel plot and Eggers's test (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION There is a higher risk of depression for men receiving ADT. Further studies evaluating optimal treatments for depression in men on ADT are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shurjeel Uddin Qazi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zahabia Altaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Mariam Zafar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Ali Tariq
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Areesha Khalid
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Aleesha Kaleem
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Emaan Saad
- Department of Surgery, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sana Qazi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dash S, Singh PA, Bajwa N, Choudhury A, Bisht P, Sharma R. Why Pharmacovigilance of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs is Important in India? Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2024; 24:731-748. [PMID: 37855282 DOI: 10.2174/0118715303247469230926092404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are among the drugs that are most regularly administered to manage inflammation and pain. Over-the-Counter (OTC) NSAIDs are widely accessible, particularly in developing countries like India. This casual approach to using NSAIDs may operate as a magnet for NSAID-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among patients. OBJECTIVES As patients in India are less informed about the appropriate use of NSAIDs and consumption patttern, adverse drug reactions, and the importance of reporting ADRs, the current study's objective is to promote patient safety by using pharmacovigilance as a tool to educate patients. METHODS A targeted literature methodology was utilized to gather the data pertaining to NSAIDs, their ADRs and their pharmacovigilance. Different scientific databases, such as Science Direct, PubMed, Wiley Online Library, Springer, and Google Scholar, along with authentic textbooks, were explored as reference literature. RESULTS In general, NSAIDs consumption pattern depends upon the different age groups. Around 1.6 billion tablets of NSAIDs are consumed in India for ailments, such as headaches, arthritis, menstrual cramps, osteoarthritis, back pain, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, osteoporosis, tendinitis, cancer pain and chronic pain. Common ADRs of NSAIDs include nausea, vomiting, headache, gastritis, abdominal pain, and diarrhoea. Also, they can cause renal damage and cardiovascular problems if not consumed in a dose-dependent manner. However, Diclofenac and Ibuprofen have both been linked to depression and dementia. There have been reports of aplastic anaemia, agranulocytosis linked to phenylbutazone, Stevens-Johnson, and Lyell's syndrome linked to isoxicam and piroxicam, as well as the vulnerability of new-borns to Reye's syndrome after aspirin use. Lack of awareness, time constraints and unpredictability, poor training in ADRs identification, etc., are some of the reasons for the under-reporting of ADR of NSAIDs in India. CONCLUSION In order to rationally prescribe NSAIDs, it is essential to be aware of probable ADR's and establish prescription guidelines. Prescribers' behaviour can be changed toward excellent prescribing practices by conducting routine prescription assessments dealing with NSAIDs and providing feedback. In the near future, it will be critical to strengthen ADR data management and expand the reach of pharmacovigilance programs, ADR monitoring centers, and healthcare professionals' especially pharmacists' training in rural locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subhransu Dash
- University Institute of Pharma Sciences (UIPS), Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India
| | - Preet Amol Singh
- University Institute of Pharma Sciences (UIPS), Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India
| | - Neha Bajwa
- University Institute of Pharma Sciences (UIPS), Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India
| | - Abinash Choudhury
- University Institute of Pharma Sciences (UIPS), Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India
| | - Preeti Bisht
- University Institute of Pharma Sciences (UIPS), Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India
| | - Rajiv Sharma
- College of Pharmacy, Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Campbell P, Gebrael G, Narang A, Chehade CH, Thomas VM, Galarza Fortuna G, Sayegh N, Tripathi N, Tandar C, Dal E, Li H, Swami U, Agarwal N, Maughan BL. Testosterone suppression and recovery in patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen deprivation therapy with relugolix. Ther Adv Urol 2024; 16:17562872241293779. [PMID: 39524157 PMCID: PMC11549705 DOI: 10.1177/17562872241293779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (iADT) may result in measurable improvements in quality of life over continuous ADT in patients with advanced prostate cancer (aPC). Here, we studied time to castration and testosterone recovery in real-world patients with aPC undergoing iADT with relugolix. Methods and design Eligibility criteria for this retrospective study were histologically confirmed through the diagnosis of aPC and initiation of iADT with relugolix. Primary endpoints were time to castrate level of testosterone after relugolix initiation and time to recovery to noncastrate levels after relugolix discontinuation. Results Overall, 25 patients with aPC were treated with iADT and with relugolix. Median time to serum testosterone <50 ng/dL was 1.13 months [range 0.67-2.5 months]. The median time to recovery >50 ng/dL was 1.4 months [range 0.83-6.57 months] from holding treatment with relugolix. Conclusion iADT with relugolix is associated with a rapid time to testosterone suppression and recovery. These results may guide patients' counseling and monitoring of serum testosterone and PSA levels in patients wishing to pursue iADT for aPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Campbell
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Georges Gebrael
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Arshit Narang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Chadi Hage Chehade
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vinay Mathew Thomas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gliceida Galarza Fortuna
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nicolas Sayegh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center Sinai Grace Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Clara Tandar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Emre Dal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Haoran Li
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS, USA
| | - Umang Swami
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Benjamin L. Maughan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li X, Lei Y, Liu J, Lin H, Chen K, Yin F, Wang C, Zhang H. Case report: a successful treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with severe dermatologic toxicities in a patient with double primary malignancies. Discov Oncol 2023; 14:146. [PMID: 37553451 PMCID: PMC10409686 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00749-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Dermatological toxicities are well-recognized immune-related adverse events (irAEs) secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use. Corticosteroids are considered the first-line therapy for grade 3 or grade 4 skin irAEs, but long-term usage of corticosteroids may abolish the effect of ICIs. Multiple antitumor therapies might be an influencing factor in an increased incidence of skin irAEs. The safety and prognostic value in resuming ICIs after irAEs has been inconsistently reported, especially the severe skin irAE. We report a case of a 75-year-old man with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prostate cancer with a Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)-like eruption. The severe rash might have been induced by resuming pembrolizumab was successfully treated with a combination of corticosteroids, gamma globulin, and immunosuppressants. Early detection of dermatologic toxicity is crucial, especially for patients receiving multiple antitumor treatments. We should treat ICI resumption seriously after skin irAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Li
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yi Lei
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiyan Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hongyin Lin
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University Chengdu, Chengdu, China
| | - Kexin Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Institution of Inflammation and Immunity, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fang Yin
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Institution of Inflammation and Immunity, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chunhui Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Institution of Inflammation and Immunity, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: prostate cancer - Management of metastatic disease and castration resistance. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1373-1419. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
10
|
Kataoka T, Sanagawa A, Suzuki J, Muto T, Hotta Y, Kawade Y, Maeda Y, Tohkin M, Kimura K. Influence of anticancer agents on sexual function: an in Vivo study based on the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Andrology 2021; 10:166-178. [PMID: 34390622 PMCID: PMC9291990 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with cancer are treated with chemotherapeutics that cause adverse effects, including erectile dysfunction (ED). Objectives We investigated erectile function in rats after the administration of anticancer agents based on data retrieved through mining of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database. Materials and methods The statistical signal strength for the association between anticancer drugs and ED was calculated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR). A drug–event combination was detected when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the ROR exceeded 1.00. Rats were administered anticancer agents detected in the FDA AERS analysis. Erectile function was assessed using intracavernous pressure (ICP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) analysis after electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve. Statistical significance was determined using Welch's t‐test or two‐way ANOVA. Results Melphalan (L‐PAM; ROR = 4.72, 95% CI = 2.78–8.00), vincristine (VCR; ROR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.54–3.97), docetaxel (DTX; ROR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.28–3.95), methotrexate (MTX; ROR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.39–2.75), and doxorubicin (DOX; ROR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.07–3.19) enhanced ED risk. L‐PAM and MTX decreased the ICP/MAP ratio 1 week after administration. VCR and DOX decreased erectile function 4 weeks after administration. DTX decreased erectile function at all assessed time points. Discussion and conclusion Certain anticancer agents should be considered risk factors for ED. Our results provide possible treatment strategies for maintaining erectile function in cancer survivors, including careful erectile function monitoring after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoya Kataoka
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akimasa Sanagawa
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| | - Jun Suzuki
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Muto
- Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| | - Yuji Hotta
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kawade
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Maeda
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tohkin
- Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| | - Kazunori Kimura
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yokomizo A, Koga H, Ito K, Takezawa Y, Komiyama M, Nishimura K, Yonese J, Hashine K, Masumori N, Arai G, Saito S, Shinohara M, Shimizu N, Yamauchi A, Satoh T, Tochigi T, Kobayashi M, Fujimoto H, Kakimoto KI, Fukui I, Tsukamoto T, Nozaki M, Karasawa K, Hasumi M, Ohtani M, Ishiyama H, Kuwahara M, Harada M, Ohashi Y, Kotake T, Kakizoe T, Suzuki K, Naito S, Yamanaka H. Patient-reported outcomes following neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, external beam radiation, and adjuvant continuous/intermittent endocrine therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: A randomized phase III trial. Cancer Med 2021; 10:3240-3248. [PMID: 33932114 PMCID: PMC8124125 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) during neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by either adjuvant continuous ADT (CADT) or intermittent ADT (IADT) for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (Pca). Methods A multicenter, randomized phase III trial enrolled 303 patients with locally advanced Pca. The patients were treated with 6 months (M) of ADT followed by 72 Gy of EBRT, and were randomly assigned to CADT or IADT after 14 M. The PROs were evaluated at sic points: baseline, 6 M, 8 M, 14 M, 20 M, and 38 M using FACT‐P questionnaires and EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual bother subscales. Results The FACT‐P total scores were significantly better (p < 0.05) in IADT versus CADT at 20 M (121.6 vs.115.4) and at 38 M (119.9 vs. 115.2). The physical well‐being scores (PWB) were significantly better (p < 0.05) in IADT versus CADT at 38 M (25.4 vs. 24.0). The functional scores were significantly better in IADT than those in CADT at 14 M (20.2 vs18.7, p < 0.05) and at 20 M (21.0 vs.18.9, p < 0.05). Conclusion The PRO was significantly favorable in IADT on FACT‐P total score at 20 M and 38 M, PWB and functional scores at 38 M.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Yokomizo
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyusyu University, Fukuoka, Japan.,Department of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Koga
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyusyu University, Fukuoka, Japan.,Department of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuto Ito
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Yutaka Takezawa
- Department of Urology, Isesaki Municipal Hospital, Isesaki, Japan
| | - Motokiyo Komiyama
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuo Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Junji Yonese
- Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Gaku Arai
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo University Koshigaya Hospital, Koshigaya, Japan
| | - Shiro Saito
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Shinohara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Gunma Cancer Center Hospital, Ohta, Japan
| | - Atsushi Yamauchi
- Department of Urology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama, Japan
| | - Takefumi Satoh
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Tochigi
- Department of Urology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| | - Mikio Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Isesaki Municipal Hospital, Isesaki, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Kakimoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Iwao Fukui
- Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taiji Tsukamoto
- Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokkyo University Koshigaya Hospital, Koshigaya, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Karasawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Hasumi
- Department of Urology, Gunma Cancer Center Hospital, Ohta, Japan
| | - Mikinobu Ohtani
- Department of Urology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ishiyama
- Department of Radiation and Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kazuhiro Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Seiji Naito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyusyu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Virgo KS, Rumble RB, de Wit R, Mendelson DS, Smith TJ, Taplin ME, Wade JL, Bennett CL, Scher HI, Nguyen PL, Gleave M, Morgan SC, Loblaw A, Sachdev S, Graham DL, Vapiwala N, Sion AM, Simons VH, Talcott J. Initial Management of Noncastrate Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1274-1305. [PMID: 33497248 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Update all preceding ASCO guidelines on initial hormonal management of noncastrate advanced, recurrent, or metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS The Expert Panel based recommendations on a systematic literature review. Recommendations were approved by the Expert Panel and the ASCO Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. RESULTS Four clinical practice guidelines, one clinical practice guidelines endorsement, 19 systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses, 47 phase III randomized controlled trials, nine cohort studies, and two review papers informed the guideline update. RECOMMENDATIONS Docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide, each when administered with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), represent four separate standards of care for noncastrate metastatic prostate cancer. Currently, the use of any of these agents in any particular combination or series cannot be recommended. ADT plus docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide should be offered to men with metastatic noncastrate prostate cancer, including those who received prior therapies, but have not yet progressed. The combination of ADT plus abiraterone and prednisolone should be considered for men with noncastrate locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer who have undergone radiotherapy, rather than castration monotherapy. Immediate ADT may be offered to men who initially present with noncastrate locally advanced nonmetastatic disease who have not undergone previous local treatment and are unwilling or unable to undergo radiotherapy. Intermittent ADT may be offered to men with high-risk biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Active surveillance may be offered to men with low-risk biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic prostate cancer. The panel does not support use of either micronized abiraterone acetate or the 250 mg dose of abiraterone with a low-fat breakfast in the noncastrate setting at this time.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James L Wade
- Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois, Decatur, IL
| | | | - Howard I Scher
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center & Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Martin Gleave
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Loblaw
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Amy M Sion
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Population-based Assessment of Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy Utilization for Relapsed, Nonmetastatic, Hormone-sensitive Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 43:865-871. [PMID: 32976179 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care for men with nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (nmHSPC) after treatment failure. Although intermittent ADT (iADT) is noninferior to continuous ADT for prostate cancer outcomes, with superior quality of life and cost-to-benefit ratio, little is known regarding its real-world utilization. The authors aimed to determine the utilization of iADT in a Canadian Provincial Cancer Program for relapsed nmHSPC and identified risk factors associated with the nonreceipt of iADT. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective population-based cohort study used linked administrative databases to identify all patients with relapsed nmHSPC from 2012 to 2016 and quantified ADT prescription history. Patients were defined as iADT eligible if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was <4 ng/mL and trending downwards on ≥2 sequential PSAs after ≥6 months of ADT. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with nonreceipt of iADT. RESULTS A total of 601 men with relapsed, nmHSPC were included with a median age at relapse of 73 (range, 46 to 96), pre-ADT PSA of 12.2 ng/mL, and a median pre-ADT PSA doubling time of 7.8 months. 80.9% of the cohort were eligible to receive iADT and 74.4% were treated with iADT. On multivariable analysis, patients originally treated with surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.46) or having a Gleason Score ≥8 (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12-0.78) had decreased odds of receipt of iADT. Patients with longer PSA doubling times were more likely to receive iADT (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.17-6.31). CONCLUSIONS The utilization of iADT was relatively common for men in Manitoba during the study period, however, the uptake of iADT can be improved among identified subgroups.
Collapse
|
14
|
Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l’AFU – actualisation 2020–2022 : cancer de la prostate. Prog Urol 2020; 30:S136-S251. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30752-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
15
|
Van Poppel H, Abrahamsson PA. Considerations for the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2020; 27:830-837. [PMID: 32662187 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in men, representing a major source of morbidity and mortality. Androgen deprivation therapy is the primary treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer at disease presentation, which can be achieved either with surgical or chemical castration. The development of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists revolutionized the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, replacing the need for surgical castration. Agonists downregulate gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist receptors in the pituitary gland, and thus decrease the release of luteinizing hormone and testosterone. Although agonists are a common therapeutic option to date, their use is associated with testosterone surges, metabolic dysfunction and an increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease; they might contribute to tumor flares and potentially an increase in non-cancer mortality. More recently, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists have entered the prostate cancer treatment landscape. Unlike agonists, antagonists directly inhibit the androgen receptor in the pituitary gland, and thus do not cause initial testosterone surges. In this article, we provide a concise review of the mechanism of actions, safety and efficacy of the approved agonists and antagonists for prostate cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
16
|
Perera M, Roberts MJ, Klotz L, Higano CS, Papa N, Sengupta S, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:469-481. [PMID: 32606361 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-0335-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is still a mainstay of treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Continuous ADT causes considerable patient morbidity including sexual dysfunction, poor mood and physical capacity, changes in body composition and health-care-related costs. Intermittent ADT has been used as an approach to ADT monotherapy to limit morbidity by enabling cyclical recovery of serum testosterone levels. To date, a number of well-performed randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated statistically insignificant differences in oncological outcomes between intermittent and continuous ADT monotherapy. Sexual outcomes, morbidity profiles and cost-savings favour intermittent therapy in most randomized trials, but the benefit for clinical practice is unclear. Despite the growing body of evidence, the optimal administration regime for ADT has not been clearly established and incorporation of adjunctive upfront treatments such as chemotherapy and novel anti-androgen agents has further hampered progress. Recommendations by authoritative urological and oncological societies regarding the use of intermittent ADT are limited. The potential benefits of reduced morbidity for a particular patient must be considered in light of the possible oncological outcomes. Although the oncological changes associated with intermittent ADT are controversial, intermittent ADT does seem to provide symptomatic benefit in patients compared with continuous ADT. However, careful selection of suitable patients is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Matthew J Roberts
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nathan Papa
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,EHCS, Monash University, Box Hill, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Urology Department, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rozet F, Hennequin C, Beuzeboc P, Mathieu R, Mongiat-Artus P, Beauval JB, Cormier L, Fromont-Hankard G, Ploussard G, Renard-Penna R, Brureau L, Méjean A. [French CCAFU guidelines on prostate cancer: hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer-update 2020]. Prog Urol 2020; 30:430-438. [PMID: 32517891 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the Cancerology Committee of the French Association of urology (CCAFU) is to propose an update of the guidelines in the management of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2018 to 2020 was conducted by the CCAFU Findings. Several patterns can be defined at this stage depending on prognostic, metastatic volume, and whether metastases are synchronous or metachronous. Androgenic deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the mainstay of treatment at the metastatic stage. Docetaxel in combination with ADT improves overall survival in synchronous metastatic prostate cancer. In this situation, the combination of ADT with abiraterone is also a standard of care regardless of tumor volume. Recent data have led to the recommendation that ADT should be used in conjunction with a new generation hormone therapy (Apalutamide or Enzalutamide) in metastatic synchronous or metachronous patients, regardless of tumour volume. Local treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy improves survival in synchronous oligometastatic patients. Metastases-directed therapy is being evaluated. CONCLUSION This update of the French recommendations should help improve the management of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Rozet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France.
| | - C Hennequin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - P Beuzeboc
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - R Mathieu
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - P Mongiat-Artus
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - J-B Beauval
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - L Cormier
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - G Fromont-Hankard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - G Ploussard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - R Renard-Penna
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - L Brureau
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marandino L, De Luca E, Zichi C, Lombardi P, Reale ML, Pignataro D, Di Stefano RF, Ghisoni E, Mariniello A, Trevisi E, Leone G, Muratori L, La Salvia A, Sonetto C, Buttigliero C, Tucci M, Aglietta M, Novello S, Scagliotti GV, Perrone F, Di Maio M. Quality-of-Life Assessment and Reporting in Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review of Phase 3 Trials Testing Anticancer Drugs Published Between 2012 and 2018. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:332-347.e2. [PMID: 31416754 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is not included among the end points in many studies, and QoL results are underreported in many phase 3 oncology trials. We performed a systematic review to describe QoL prevalence and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in recently published prostate cancer phase 3 trials. A PubMed search was performed to identify primary publications of randomized phase 3 trials testing anticancer drugs in prostate cancer, issued between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed QoL inclusion among end points, presence of QoL results, and methodology of QoL analysis. Seventy-two publications were identified (15 early-stage, 20 advanced hormone-sensitive, and 37 castration-resistant prostate cancer [CRPC]). QoL was not listed among study end points in 23 studies (31.9%) (40.0% early stage, 40.0% advanced hormone sensitive, and 24.3% CRPC). QoL results were absent in 15 (30.6%) of 49 primary publications of trials that included QoL among end points. Overall, as a result of absent end point or unpublished results, QoL data were lacking in 38 (52.8%) primary publications (53.3% early stage, 55.0% in advanced hormone sensitive, and 51.4% in CRPC). The most commonly used QoL tools were Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) (21, 53.8%) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) (14, 35.9%); most common methods of analysis were mean changes or mean scores (28, 71.8%), time to deterioration (14, 35.9%), and proportion of patients with response (10, 25.6%). In conclusion, QoL data are lacking in a not negligible proportion of recently published phase 3 trials in prostate cancer, although the presence of QoL results is better in positive trials, especially in CRPC. The methodology of QoL analysis is heterogeneous for type of instruments, analysis, and presentation of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Marandino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Emmanuele De Luca
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Clizia Zichi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Pasquale Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Reale
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Daniele Pignataro
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Rosario F Di Stefano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Eleonora Ghisoni
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Annapaola Mariniello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Elena Trevisi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Gianmarco Leone
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Leonardo Muratori
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Cristina Sonetto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Marcello Tucci
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Massimo Aglietta
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Giorgio V Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shevach J, Sydes MR, Hussain M. Revisiting Intermittent Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Can Less Be More in the "New World Order"? Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:125-133. [PMID: 30803926 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and a potential treatment option in those with prostate-specific antigen relapse after local therapy. Based on promising biological and preclinical data, several clinical trials compared the efficacy of intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) versus continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) with the objective of delaying disease progression and improving survival and quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to revisit the concept of IAD in the "new world order" and reconsider whether it has a potential clinical role in an era where we have seen unprecedented progress in the management of patients with metastatic HSPC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing IAD and CAD therapies. References of retrieved articles were also searched. Articles with at least 100 randomized patients, which were published in 2008 or later and had data on overall survival or QoL outcomes, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The evidence to date cannot exclude inferiority of IAD compared with CAD with respect to survival outcomes. The hazard ratios in metastatic disease indicate less favorable survival with IAD. No superiority trial conclusively favored IAD or CAD. Two trials demonstrated noninferiority of IAD, although the noninferiority margins (NIMs) are clinically concerning. Another trial could not exclude noninferiority. A modest but temporary QoL and symptom benefit generally favoring IAD was observed. CONCLUSIONS IAD has not conclusively demonstrated an impact on disease progression or survival, and has only modest effects on QoL and symptoms measured in the short term. As such, it is not the standard of care, particularly in the era where we have seen unprecedented survival impact with combination ADT+docetaxel or abiraterone +prednisone. IAD may need to be reassessed in the context of current therapies, ideally driven by biological rationale, with the goal of minimizing physical and financial toxicities with appropriately designed informative clinical trials. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, we looked at two hormone therapy approaches for prostate cancer that is still sensitive to castration: one with treatment breaks and one without. Patients may tolerate therapy with breaks more easily, but this effect is not sustained and is not associated with better longevity. The best longevity is seen in patients who receive newer hormone therapies or chemotherapy in addition to continuous hormone therapy. Whether these newer therapies would be as effective if given intermittently is an important but unanswered question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Shevach
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maha Hussain
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sung HH, Yu J, Kang SJ, Chae MR, So I, Park JK, Lee SW. Persistent Erectile Dysfunction after Discontinuation of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Therapy in Rats Depending on the Duration of Treatment. World J Mens Health 2018; 37:240-248. [PMID: 30588787 PMCID: PMC6479083 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.180082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The current study is aimed to assess whether a longer duration of 5α-reductase inhibitor (5α-RI) exposure was associated with higher rate of permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) in a rat model. Materials and Methods Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=76) were assigned to five groups: (i) normal control group; (ii) dutasteride (0.5 mg/rat/d) for 4-weeks group; (iii) dutasteride for 4-weeks plus 2-weeks of resting group; (iv) dutasteride for 8-weeks group; and (v) dutasteride for 8-weeks plus 2-weeks of resting group. In vivo erectile responses to electrical stimulation, and changes of fibrotic factors and smooth muscle/collagen contents in the corpus cavernosum were evaluated in each group. Results Dutasteride administration for 4 and 8 weeks significantly decreased erectile parameters compared with the control group. Reduced erectile responses were recovered during 2 weeks of drug-free time in the 4-week treatment group, but were not in the 8-week group. Protein levels of fibrosis-related factors transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, TGF-β2, and p-Smad/Smad (Smad 2/3) in the corpus cavernosum showed no significant change after 4 weeks of dutasteride oral administration, but were enhanced after 8 weeks. Dutasteride markedly decreased smooth muscle content and increased collagen after 4 and 8 weeks of use, but no nuclear size changes; however, neither group showed significant improvement in the smooth muscle to collagen ratio after the rest period. Conclusions Our study showed that recovery from ED depended on the duration of medication, and administration of dutasteride for more than 8-weeks in rats could result in irreversible ED even after discontinuation of medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiwoong Yu
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Jeong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Ree Chae
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Insuk So
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Kwan Park
- Department of Urology, Chonbuk National University College of Medicine and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute and Clinical Trial Center of Medical Device of Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Sung Won Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rozet F, Hennequin C, Beauval JB, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont-Hankard G, Mongiat-Artus P, Ploussard G, Mathieu R, Brureau L, Ouzzane A, Azria D, Brenot-Rossi I, Cancel-Tassin G, Cussenot O, Rebillard X, Lebret T, Soulié M, Penna RR, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : cancer de la prostate French ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Prostate cancer. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S79-S130. [PMID: 30392712 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Rozet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, université René-Descartes, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75674, Paris, France.
| | - C Hennequin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service de radiothérapie, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, 75010, Paris, France
| | - J-B Beauval
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, oncologie médicale, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, CHU Rangueil, 31100, Toulouse, France
| | - P Beuzeboc
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, 92150, Suresnes, France
| | - L Cormier
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU François-Mitterrand, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - G Fromont-Hankard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; CHU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France
| | - P Mongiat-Artus
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, Paris cedex 10, France
| | - G Ploussard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, clinique La Croix du Sud-Saint-Jean Languedoc, institut universitaire du cancer, 31100, Toulouse, France
| | - R Mathieu
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033, Rennes cedex 9, France
| | - L Brureau
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Inserm, U1085, IRSET, 97145 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe
| | - A Ouzzane
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Claude-Huriez, CHRU de Lille, rue Michel-Polonovski, 59000, Lille, France
| | - D Azria
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Inserm U1194, ICM, université de Montpellier, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - I Brenot-Rossi
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - G Cancel-Tassin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; GRC no 5 ONCOTYPE-URO, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - O Cussenot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - X Rebillard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, clinique mutualiste Beau-Soleil, 119, avenue de Lodève, 34070, Montpellier, France
| | - T Lebret
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, 92150, Suresnes, France
| | - M Soulié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Centre hospitalier universitaire Rangueil, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - R Renard Penna
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; GRC no 5 ONCOTYPE-URO, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne université, 75020, Paris, France; Service de radiologie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 75020, Paris, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75015, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rozet F, Hennequin C, Beauval JB, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont-Hankard G, Mongiat-Artus P, Ploussard G, Mathieu R, Brureau L, Ouzzane A, Azria D, Brenot-Rossi I, Cancel-Tassin G, Cussenot O, Rebillard X, Lebret T, Soulié M, Renard Penna R, Méjean A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : cancer de la prostate. Prog Urol 2018; 28 Suppl 1:R81-R132. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
23
|
Nguyen C, Lairson DR, Swartz MD, Du XL. Risks of Major Long-Term Side Effects Associated with Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Men with Prostate Cancer. Pharmacotherapy 2018; 38:999-1009. [PMID: 30080934 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To examine the risks and compare the occurrences of major long-term side effects (sexual dysfunction, bone fractures, diabetes, cardiovascular morbidity, acute myocardial infarction [MI], and dementia) in patients with prostate cancer who received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with those who did not. DESIGN Propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims data. DATA SOURCE National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare linked database. PATIENTS A total of 201,797 patients 66 years or older who were diagnosed with any stage of prostate cancer between 1992 and 2009; of these, 94,528 patients received ADT; 107,269 patients did not. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We identified receipt of ADT and number of claims for ADT, and ascertained the long-term treatment-related side effects that occurred during 19 years of follow-up, from 1992-2010, from Medicare claims data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) of newly developed side effects. Among all potential long-term side effects, the risk of bone fractures was highest (HR 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.43), followed by diabetes (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.18-1.24), dementia (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.20), coronary heart disease (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.14), and acute MI (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.15) in those who received ADT compared with those who did not. The HRs for bone fractures and diabetes increased steadily as the number of ADT doses increased, indicating a linear trend in the dose-response relationship. Compared with patients who received active surveillance, ADT was associated with a 12% increased risk of sexual dysfunction (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20). The HR for sexual dysfunction increased to 1.68 (95% CI 1.59-1.77) when ADT was combined with radiation therapy and to 3.54 (95% CI 3.26-3.85) when ADT was combined with radiation and surgery. CONCLUSION The results of this study demonstrated that in men with prostate cancer, receipt of ADT was associated with higher risks of bone fractures, diabetes, dementia, coronary heart disease, acute MI, and sexual dysfunction than in those who did not receive ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Nguyen
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - David R Lairson
- Department of Management Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael D Swartz
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Xianglin L Du
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Maru S, Uchino H, Osawa T, Chiba S, Mouri G, Sazawa A. Long-term treatment outcomes of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for relapsed prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197252. [PMID: 29795595 PMCID: PMC5967753 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy is an effective treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. However, no study to date has evaluated the long-term outcomes of this treatment among patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively examined the treatment outcomes of patients with prostate-specific antigen recurrence who underwent radical prostatectomy at our department. MATERIALS AND METHODS Of the 690 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for local prostate cancer between 1988 and 2011, 129 patients who received androgen deprivation therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence were included in this study. Patient characteristics, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist administration, and outcomes were compared between the intermittent androgen deprivation group (n = 66) and the continuous androgen deprivation therapy group (n = 63). The non-recurrence and overall survival rates were compared between groups. RESULTS Thirty-six patients (27.9%) experienced recurrence after luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist administration. The 5-year non-recurrence rate and 10-year overall survival rate were higher in the intermittent group (92.9%) than in the continuous group (92.9 vs 57.9%, P < 0.001; and 95.9% vs 84.3%, P = 0.047, respectively). Furthermore, 63 patients (48.8%) showed a PSA nadir of less than 0.01 ng/mL after initiation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist; among these patients, the non-recurrence rate was significantly higher in the intermittent androgen deprivation group (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy contributed to improvement of the non-recurrence rate and overall survival, and can be considered an effective therapy for better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Maru
- Department of Urology, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
- Department of Urology, Jinyukai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hideki Uchino
- Department of Urology, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Satoshi Chiba
- Department of Urology, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Gaku Mouri
- Department of Urology, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Ataru Sazawa
- Department of Urology, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Erectile dysfunction and decreased libido are common complaints in the older male population. Recent studies have elucidated the role testosterone therapy (TTh) can play in men with low testosterone levels. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of these findings and the utility of TTh. We specifically examine the role of TTh on erectile function, coadministration with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and libido. RECENT FINDINGS Recent publications suggest that TTh improves mild erectile dysfunction, though may be less useful in men with more severe erectile dysfunction. In men unresponsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and with mild erectile dysfunction, TTh can further improve erectile function. TTh has also shown consistent benefit in improving libido in men with low testosterone levels at baseline, with no additional improvements once testosterone levels are normalized. SUMMARY The available literature supports a role for TTh in men with low testosterone levels, erectile dysfunction, and low libido, with symptomatic improvement in these men.
Collapse
|
26
|
Nead KT, Boldbaatar N, Yang DD, Sinha S, Nguyen PL. Association of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Thromboembolic Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urology 2018; 114:155-162. [PMID: 29352986 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the association of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer with thromboembolic events. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried on April 5, 2017 for systematic review. Additionally, The World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform was queried on June 23, 2017. Eligible studies reported thromboembolic events among individuals with prostate cancer exposed to ADT vs a lesser-exposed group. Five hundred sixty-nine unique studies were identified with 65 undergoing full-text review. We utilized the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement guidelines and the Cochrane Review Group's data extraction template. Study quality was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to calculate summary statistic risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. Small study effects were evaluated using Begg and Egger statistics. RESULTS In 10 studies "ADT without estrogen" increased the risk of thromboembolic events (risk ratio [RR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.77, P = .001). In 9 studies estrogen therapy alone was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (RR 3.72, 95% CI 1.78-7.80, P <.001). We found an increased risk of thromboembolic events from ADT use without estrogen when limited to localized disease (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, P <.001). Heterogeneity was resolved in those studies examining localized disease. There was no evidence of small study effects. CONCLUSION The currently available evidence suggests that ADT without estrogen is associated with an increased the risk of thromboembolic events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T Nead
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Ninjin Boldbaatar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David D Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sumi Sinha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nam W, Choi SY, Yoo SJ, Ryu J, Lee J, Kyung YS, Han JH, You D, Jeong IG, Hong JH, Ahn H, Kim CS. Factors associated with testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer. Investig Clin Urol 2017; 59:18-24. [PMID: 29333510 PMCID: PMC5754577 DOI: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.1.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We investigated factors affecting testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) withdrawal in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods The medical records of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with ADT were retrospectively reviewed. In all, 221 patients were included in the analysis. Testosterone recovery was defined as supra-castration (SC) (testosterone levels in serum >50 ng/dL) or out of hypogonadism (OH) (>300 ng/dL) after ADT withdrawal. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate testosterone recovery after ADT cessation. Cox regression analyses were used to determine the factors affecting the recovery of testosterone. Results After ADT, 206 patients (93.2%) recovered to the SC level and 122 patients (55.2%) recovered to the OH level. Patients treated with ADT for ≤18 months recovered to OH in a mean of 6.8 months (74.6%), but patients treated with ADT for >18 months recovered in a mean of 9.7 months (27.5%). In multivariate analyses, age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.915; p<0.001), serum level of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (HR, 1.015; p=0.002), initial testosterone level (HR, 1.002; p=0.002), and ADT duration (HR, 0.915; p<0.001) were associated with recovery to the OH level after ADT withdrawal, and hypertension (HR, 0.697; p=0.029) and duration of ADT (HR, 0.979; p=0.012) were significantly associated with recovery to SC. Conclusions In patients treated with ADT for ≤18 months, testosterone recovers to the OH level more often and faster after ADT cessation. Age, SHBG level, initial testosterone level, and ADT duration are associated with testosterone recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wook Nam
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Young Choi
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Jun Yoo
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeman Ryu
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaehoon Lee
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Soo Kyung
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyeon Han
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dalsan You
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Gab Jeong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Hyuk Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Choung-Soo Kim
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abrahamsson PA. Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: Connecting the dots. Asian J Urol 2017; 4:208-222. [PMID: 29387553 PMCID: PMC5772839 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2016] [Revised: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IADT) is now being increasingly opted by the treating physicians and patients with prostate cancer. The most common reason driving this is the availability of an off-treatment period to the patients that provides some relief from treatment-related side-effects, and reduced treatment costs. IADT may also delay the progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, the use of IADT in the setting of prostate cancer has not been strongly substantiated by data from clinical trials. Multiple factors seem to contribute towards this inadequacy of supportive data for the use of IADT in patients with prostate cancer, e.g., population characteristics (both demographic and clinical), study design, treatment regimen, on- and off-treatment criteria, duration of active treatment, endpoints, and analysis. The present review article focuses on seven clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of IADT vs. continuous androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. The results from these clinical trials have been discussed in light of the factors that may impact the treatment outcomes, especially the disease (tumor) burden. Based on evidence, potential candidate population for IADT has been suggested along with recommendations for the use of IADT in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Nead KT, Sinha S, Yang DD, Nguyen PL. Association of androgen deprivation therapy and depression in the treatment of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:664.e1-664.e9. [PMID: 28803700 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may be associated with depression. Existing studies have shown conflicting results. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO were queried on April 5, 2017. Eligible studies were in English and reported depression among individuals with prostate cancer exposed to a course of ADT vs. a lesser-exposed group (e.g., any-ADT vs. no ADT and continuous ADT vs. intermittent ADT). We used the MOOSE statement guidelines and the Cochrane Review Group's data extraction template. Study quality was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to calculate summary statistic risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic and prespecified subgroup analysis. Small study effects were evaluated using Begg and Egger statistics. RESULTS A total of 1,128 studies were initially identified and evaluated. A meta-analysis of 18 studies among 168,756 individuals found that ADT use conferred a 41% increased risk of depression (RR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18-1.70; P<0.001). We found a consistent strong statistically significant association when limiting our analysis to studies in localized disease (RR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.20-2.85; P = 0.005) and those using a clinical diagnosis of depression (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.08-1.32; P = 0.001). We did not find an association for continuous ADT with depression risk compared to intermittent ADT (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.50-1.99; P = 0.992). There was no statistically significant evidence of small study effects. Statistically significant heterogeneity in the full analysis (I2 = 80%; 95% CI: 69-87; P<0.001) resolved when examining studies using a clinical diagnosis of depression (I2 = 16%; 95% CI: 0-60; P = 0.310). CONCLUSION The currently available evidence suggests that ADT in the treatment of prostate cancer is associated with an increased risk of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T Nead
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Sumi Sinha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David D Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of the guidelines national committee CCAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A Medline search was achieved between 2013 and 2016, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of PCa, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of > 74Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSIONS These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer. © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Collapse
|
31
|
A meta-analysis of cardiovascular events in intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy versus continuous androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2016; 19:333-339. [PMID: 27595915 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Revised: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment for advanced and recurrent prostate cancer but it has been shown to cause adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Intermittent androgen deprivation has been studied as an alternative therapy. To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with prostate cancer receiving intermittent (IADT) versus continuous ADT (CADT). METHODS We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, The National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and The Clinical Trials Register of Trials Central, and Google Scholar from inception of each database through February 2016. References from published guidelines, reviews and other relevant articles were also considered. We selected randomized clinical trials comparing IADT versus CADT in patients with prostate cancer that reported data on cardiovascular events. Two reviewers performed the study selection, data abstraction and risk of bias assessment. We calculated risk ratios with the Mantel-Haenszel method, using random effect models. We assessed heterogeneity using I2 index. The primary outcome was incidence of cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events and cardiovascular-related mortality. RESULTS Out of 106 references, we included seven articles from six trials (4810 patients) published between 2009 and 2015. We observed no significant difference between intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation with respect to cardiovascular events (risk ratio (RR): 0.95; confidence interval (CI) 95%=0.83-1.08; seven trials, 4810 patients) and thromboembolic events (RR: 1.05; CI 95%=0.85-1.30; three trials, 1816 patients). There was marginally significant difference with respect to cardiovascular-related mortality (RR: 0.85; CI 95%=0.71-1.00; five trials, 4170 patients). CONCLUSIONS Compared with CADT, IADT shows no difference in terms of cardiovascular events and thromboembolic events. However, there was an association between lower cardiovascular-related mortality and intermittent androgen deprivation.
Collapse
|
32
|
Sio TT, Atherton PJ, Birckhead BJ, Schwartz DJ, Sloan JA, Seisler DK, Martenson JA, Loprinzi CL, Griffin PC, Morton RF, Anders JC, Stoffel TJ, Haselow RE, Mowat RB, Wittich MAN, Bearden JD, Miller RC. Repeated measures analyses of dermatitis symptom evolution in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy in a phase 3 randomized trial of mometasone furoate vs placebo (N06C4 [alliance]). Support Care Cancer 2016; 24:3847-55. [PMID: 27075674 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3213-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy-related dermatological toxicities over time have not been well quantified. We examined during and immediately following radiation therapy skin toxicities over time in a randomized study of mometasone furoate vs placebo during breast radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall were randomized. Symptoms related to skin toxicity were addressed weekly using provider-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0) and 4 patient-reported outcomes (PRO) surveys. We applied repeated measures and risk analysis methodologies. RESULTS One hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled. By CTCAE, significant differences favoring mometasone were detected over time in all toxicities except skin striae, atrophy, and infection. Statistically significant differences between arms at baseline but not over time occurred for all Linear Analog Self-Assessment. Statistically significant differences occurred for all symptoms in the temporal profile of symptoms as measured by PRO surveys (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The use of longitudinal methods enhanced the ability of PRO tools to detect differences between study arms. Our results strengthened the conclusions of the original report that mometasone reduced acute skin toxicities. PRO surveys can accurately assess patients' experiences of symptom type and intensity over time and should be included in future clinical trials. For radiotherapy-related dermatological toxicity, we hypothesized that clinically significant differences over time, if any, can be found by repeated measures. We examined the acute skin toxicities in a randomized study of mometasone vs placebo during breast radiotherapy. For secondary end points, we showed that longitudinal methods enhanced the detection of differences between study arms and strengthened the conclusions from the original report. Frequent patient-reported outcome surveys over time should be included in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Pamela J Atherton
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - David J Schwartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jeff A Sloan
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Drew K Seisler
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James A Martenson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Charles L Loprinzi
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Patricia C Griffin
- Upstate Carolina Community Clinical Oncology Program, Spartanburg, SC, USA
| | - Roscoe F Morton
- Iowa Oncology Research Association Community Clinical Oncology Program, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Jon C Anders
- Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS, USA
| | - Thomas J Stoffel
- Cedar Rapids Oncology Project Community Clinic Oncology Program, Cedar Rapids, IA, USA
| | - Robert E Haselow
- Metro-Minnesota Community Clinical Oncology Program, St. Louis Park, MN, USA
| | - Rex B Mowat
- Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program CCOP, Toledo, OH, USA
| | | | - James D Bearden
- Upstate Carolina Community Clinical Oncology Program, Spartanburg, SC, USA
| | - Robert C Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schulman C, Cornel E, Matveev V, Tammela TL, Schraml J, Bensadoun H, Warnack W, Persad R, Salagierski M, Gómez Veiga F, Baskin-Bey E, López B, Tombal B. Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Relapsing or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3b Randomised Study (ICELAND). Eur Urol 2016; 69:720-727. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 10/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
34
|
Chun-Leung Chau D, Wang D, Tedesco A, McGuffin M, Di Prospero L, Fitch M, Cao X, Feldman-Stewart D, Ellis J, Szumacher E. Prostate Cancer Patients' Preferences for Intermittent vs. Continuous Androgen Deprivation-A Pilot Institutional Study. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2016; 47:108-112.e2. [PMID: 31047156 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic prostate cancer patients, patient preference between intermittent (IAD) and continuous (CAD) androgen deprivation therapy has not been investigated. The goal of the study was to determine patients' preference for IAD vs. CAD therapy. The secondary aim was to elucidate demographic or treatment variables that may affect a patient's preference for one type of hormonal treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a tradeoff model that demonstrates the difference in outcome between IAD and CAD, a survey questionnaire was developed and administered to prostate cancer patients at the Odette Cancer Centre at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Only patients who had (1) locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) been previously treated for prostate cancer with relapsing prostate-specific antigen, or (3) slow metastatic disease were asked to participate. Data related to patients' demographic information and their decisional preference factors were collected. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Overall, 36 of 53 (68%) patients completed the survey. Most patients favoured IAD (n = 32) over CAD (n = 4). Patients currently on radical treatment (adjuvant hormone therapy and radiation therapy) preferred CAD compared with patients who were not on radical treatment (P = .044). Patients with high (>20 ng/L) pretreatment prostate-specific antigen showed preference for CAD; however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). Patients from both groups viewed quality of life as the strongest influence on their treatment preference, but had diverging opinions on side effects and general well being. The results of this pilot study could serve as a guide for future studies; a larger study combined with qualitative methodology may better address patients' needs and minimize any regret over their hormonal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Wang
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Alissa Tedesco
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Merrylee McGuffin
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Lisa Di Prospero
- Department of Research and Education, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Margaret Fitch
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Xingshan Cao
- Department of Evaluative Clinical Science, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - Janet Ellis
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hussain M, Tangen C, Higano C, Vogelzang N, Thompson I. Evaluating Intermittent Androgen-Deprivation Therapy Phase III Clinical Trials: The Devil Is in the Details. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:280-5. [PMID: 26552421 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.62.8065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) has been widely tested in prostate cancer. However, phase III trials testing continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) versus IAD have reached inconclusive and seemingly contradictory results. Different design and conduct issues must be critically evaluated to better interpret the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seven published phase III trials were examined for prespecified design and outcomes. Treatment specifications; primary end point; superiority versus noninferiority design assumptions, including magnitude of assumed versus observed noninferiority margin (NIM); duration of follow-up; and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes were considered in terms of the results and conclusions reported. RESULTS Five trials had a superiority and three had a noninferiority primary hypothesis. Only three trials had a uniform population and overall survival (OS) end point. All trials observed better outcomes in terms of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) than assumed at time of study design, translating into prespecified NIMs or hazard ratios that reflected larger absolute differences in OS or PFS between arms. Lower-than-expected event rates also reduced statistical power for the trials. Other factors, including length of follow-up, cause of death, QOL, and primary end point, and their impact on trial interpretation are discussed. CONCLUSION No trial to date has demonstrated survival superiority of IAD compared with CAD. Trials concluding IAD is noninferior to CAD were based on wide NIMs that included clinically important survival differences, not likely to be considered comparable by physicians or patients. Interim analyses relying on short follow-up and including a majority of non-prostate cancer deaths will favor a noninferiority conclusion and should be interpreted cautiously. Adequate follow-up is required to ensure capture of prostate cancer deaths in both superiority and noninferiority trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maha Hussain
- Maha Hussain, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Catherine Tangen, SWOG Statistical Center; Celestia Higano, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Nicholas Vogelzang, US Oncology, Las Vegas, NV; and Ian Thompson, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX.
| | - Catherine Tangen
- Maha Hussain, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Catherine Tangen, SWOG Statistical Center; Celestia Higano, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Nicholas Vogelzang, US Oncology, Las Vegas, NV; and Ian Thompson, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Celestia Higano
- Maha Hussain, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Catherine Tangen, SWOG Statistical Center; Celestia Higano, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Nicholas Vogelzang, US Oncology, Las Vegas, NV; and Ian Thompson, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Nicholas Vogelzang
- Maha Hussain, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Catherine Tangen, SWOG Statistical Center; Celestia Higano, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Nicholas Vogelzang, US Oncology, Las Vegas, NV; and Ian Thompson, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Ian Thompson
- Maha Hussain, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Catherine Tangen, SWOG Statistical Center; Celestia Higano, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Nicholas Vogelzang, US Oncology, Las Vegas, NV; and Ian Thompson, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ku JY, Lee JZ, Ha HK. The effect of continuous androgen deprivation treatment on prostate cancer patients as compared with intermittent androgen deprivation treatment. Korean J Urol 2015; 56:689-94. [PMID: 26495069 PMCID: PMC4610895 DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the efficacy of androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) between continuous and intermittent ADT. Materials and Methods Between January 2006 and May 2015, 603 patients were selected and divided into continuous ADT (CADT) (n=175) and intermittent ADT (IADT) (n=428) groups. The median follow-up in this study was 48.19 (1.0-114.0) months. The primary end point was time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The types of ADT were monotherapy and maximal androgen blockade (i.e., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and antiandrogen). Results The characteristics of patients showed no significant differences between the CADT and IADT groups, except for the Gleason score (p<0.001). The median time to CRPC of all enrolled patients with ADT was 20.60±1.60 months. The median time to CRPC was 11.20±1.31 months in the CADT group as compared with 22.60±2.08 months in the IADT group. In multivariate analysis, percentage of positive core (p=0.047; hazard ratio [HR], 0.976; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.953-1.000), Gleason score (p=0.007; HR, 1.977; 95% CI, 1.206-3.240), lymph node metastasis (p=0.030; HR, 0.498; 95% CI, 0.265-0.936), bone metastasis (p=0.028; HR, 1.921; 95% CI, 1.072-3.445), and CADT vs. IADT (p=0.003; HR, 0.254; 95% CI. 0.102-0.633) were correlated with the duration of progression to CRPC. The IADT group presented a significantly longer median time to CRPC compared with the CADT group. Additionally, patients in the IADT group showed a longer duration in median time to CRPC in subgroup analysis according to the Gleason score. Conclusions This study found that IADT produces a longer duration in median time to CRPC than does CADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ja Yoon Ku
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jeong Zoo Lee
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hong Koo Ha
- Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea. ; Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Donovan KA, Walker LM, Wassersug RJ, Thompson LMA, Robinson JW. Psychological effects of androgen-deprivation therapy on men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer 2015; 121:4286-99. [PMID: 26372364 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2015] [Revised: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The clinical benefits of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for men with prostate cancer (PC) have been well documented and include living free from the symptoms of metastases for longer periods and improved quality of life. However, ADT comes with a host of its own serious side effects. There is considerable evidence of the adverse cardiovascular, metabolic, and musculoskeletal effects of ADT. Far less has been written about the psychological effects of ADT. This review highlights several adverse psychological effects of ADT. The authors provide evidence for the effect of ADT on men's sexual function, their partner, and their sexual relationship. Evidence of increased emotional lability and depressed mood in men who receive ADT is also presented, and the risk of depression in the patient's partner is discussed. The evidence for adverse cognitive effects with ADT is still emerging but suggests that ADT is associated with impairment in multiple cognitive domains. Finally, the available literature is reviewed on interventions to mitigate the psychological effects of ADT. Across the array of adverse effects, physical exercise appears to have the greatest potential to address the psychological effects of ADT both in men who are receiving ADT and in their partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine A Donovan
- Supportive Care Medicine Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Lauren M Walker
- Department of Psychosocial Resources and Rehabilitation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Richard J Wassersug
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Australian Research Center in Sex, Health, and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lora M A Thompson
- Supportive Care Medicine Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - John W Robinson
- Department of Psychosocial Resources and Rehabilitation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
De Maeseneer DJ, Van Praet C, Lumen N, Rottey S. Battling resistance mechanisms in antihormonal prostate cancer treatment: Novel agents and combinations. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:310-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 01/11/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
39
|
Herrera-Caceres JO, Castillejos-Molina RA. Functional and metabolic complications of androgen deprivation therapy. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3:227-237. [DOI: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Revised: 08/09/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men worldwide. Several different treatment strategies are available including minimally invasive procedures for localized tumors such as radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy, among others. All these strategies can be given as mono-therapy or as combination therapy. For this review, we will focus on the side effects of androgen deprivation therapy, independent of the other treatment modalities. Some of the most common affections are loss of bone mineral density, weight gain and obesity, myocardial infarction and sudden death, metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, loss of libido and erectile dysfunction, fatigue, cognitive decline, vasomotor flushing, to mention a few. All these alterations can have an impact on quality of life and even lead to more serious complications such as fractures and cardiovascular complications. We present recommendations for prevention, early recognition and treatment. The different modalities for androgen deprivation therapy have particular side-effects profiles and indications should be made in an individualized manner. Androgen deprivation therapy is a useful tool for some patients with prostate cancer but every effort should be made to avoid related complications. The use of guidelines and educational programs for both, patients and urologists, are extremely useful strategies.
Collapse
|
40
|
Kratiras Z, Konstantinidis C, Skriapas K. A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a ″perpetual dispute″. Int Braz J Urol 2014; 40:3-15; discussion 15. [PMID: 24642162 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2014.01.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 10/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review the literature and present new data of continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) as therapies for prostate cancer in terms of survival and quality of life and clarify practical issues in the use of IAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic search on Medline and Embase databases using ″prostatic neoplasm″ and ″intermittent androgen deprivation″ as search terms. We reviewed meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, reviews, clinical trials and practise guidelines written in English from 2000 and onwards until 01/04/2013. Ten randomized controlled trials were identified. Seven of them published extensive data and results randomizing 4675 patients to IAD versus CAD. Data from the other three randomized trials were limited. RESULTS Over the last years studies confirmed that IAD is an effective alternative approach to hormonal deprivation providing simultaneously several potential benefits in terms of quality of life and cost effectiveness. Thus, in patients with non metastatic, advanced prostate cancer IAD could be used as standard treatment, while in metastatic prostate cancer IAD role still remains ambiguous. CONCLUSIONS Nowadays, revaluation of the gold standard of ADT in advanced prostate cancer appears essential. Recent data established that IAD should no longer be consi¬dered as investigational, since its effectiveness has been proven, especially in patients suffering from non-metastatic advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zisis Kratiras
- Department of Urology, ″Koutlibanio″ General Hospital of Larisa, Larissa, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
De Bari B, Alongi F, Lestrade L, Giammarile F. Choline-PET in prostate cancer management: The point of view of the radiation oncologist. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2014; 91:234-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2013] [Revised: 03/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
|
42
|
Wolff JM, Abrahamsson PA, Irani J, da Silva FC. Is intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy beneficial for patients with advanced prostate cancer? BJU Int 2014; 114:476-83. [PMID: 24433259 DOI: 10.1111/bju.12626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Use of intermittent androgen-deprivation therapy (IADT) in patients with prostate cancer has been evaluated in several studies, in an attempt to delay the development of castration resistance and reduce side-effects associated with ADT. However it is still not clear whether survival is adversely affected in patients treated with IADT. In this review, we explore the available data in an attempt to identify the most suitable candidate patients for IADT, and discuss factors that may inform appropriate patient stratification. ADT is first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic prostate cancer and is also recommended for use with definitive radiotherapy for high-risk localised prostate cancer. The changes in hormone levels induced by ADT can lead to short- and long-term side-effects which, although treatable in most cases, can significantly reduce the tolerability of ADT treatment. IADT has been investigated in several phase II and phase III studies in patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, in an attempt to delay time to tumour progression and reduce the side-effect burden of ADT. In selected patient groups IADT is no less effective than continuous ADT, ameliorating the impact of ADT-related side-effects, and, to a degree, their impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQL). Further comparative study is required, particularly in relation to HRQL and long-term complications associated with ADT.
Collapse
|
43
|
Intermittent androgen deprivation is a rational standard-of-care treatment for all stages of progressive prostate cancer: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2014; 17:105-11. [DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2014.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2013] [Revised: 01/13/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
44
|
Salonen AJ, Taari K, Ala-Opas M, Sankila A, Viitanen J, Lundstedt S, Tammela TLJ. Comparison of intermittent and continuous androgen deprivation and quality of life between patients with locally advanced and patients with metastatic prostate cancer: a post hoc analysis of the randomized FinnProstate Study VII. Scand J Urol 2014; 48:513-22. [PMID: 24679247 DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2014.901410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to compare intermittent (IAD) and continuous (CAD) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between locally advanced (M0) and metastatic (M1) prostate cancer, and the effect of ADT on the quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 852 men with advanced prostate cancer were enrolled to receive goserelin acetate for 24 weeks. Of these, 554 patients whose prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decreased to less than 10 ng/ml or by at least 50% (<20 ng/ml at baseline) were randomized to IAD or CAD. In the IAD arm, ADT was resumed for at least 24 weeks whenever PSA increased to greater than 20 ng/ml or above baseline. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 65 months. Median times from randomization to progression, death, prostate cancer death and treatment failure in M0 and M1 patients were 46.8 and 21.4, 57.6 and 40.3, 59.5 and 40.7, and 41.9 and 20.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant differences emerged between IAD and CAD. ADT showed a beneficial effect on pain, activity limitation and social functioning in M1 patients, and a deleterious effect on physical capacity in M0 patients and on sexual functioning in both groups. IAD offered extra benefit for activity limitation, social functioning and recovery of sexual functioning. CONCLUSIONS IAD is as efficient as CAD in treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. ADT improves quality of life in M1 patients, with IAD offering extra benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arto J Salonen
- Department of Urology, Kuopio University Hospital , Kuopio , Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Suzuki Y, Sakai D, Nomura T, Hirata Y, Aihara K. A new protocol for intermittent androgen suppression therapy of prostate cancer with unstable saddle-point dynamics. J Theor Biol 2014; 350:1-16. [PMID: 24524858 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2013] [Revised: 02/01/2014] [Accepted: 02/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) therapy is a class of hormonal treatment for prostate cancer, in which a drug-induced androgen deprivation can reduce the population of prostate cancer cells. In IAS therapy, drugs are administrated only in on-treatment periods that are separated intermittently by off-treatment periods. The presence of off-treatment periods may be beneficial for maintaining the sensitivity of the tumor cells to androgen deprivation. Thus, IAS can be superior to continuous androgen suppression (CAS) for delaying or possibly preventing relapse of a tumor. IAS therapy usually monitors the level of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which is related to the population of tumor cells. Each on-treatment period begins when the PSA level is greater than an upper threshold; treatment results in a decrease in the PSA level. The on-treatment period is suspended when the PSA level falls below a lower threshold; the PSA level then rises again until the beginning of the next on-treatment period. To determine the transitions between on- and off-treatment periods, we propose a new IAS protocol that uses a model-based estimate of the state point in the phase space of the tumor dynamics. We show that the proposed protocol is effective if, in each of the on- and off-treatment periods, the tumor dynamics exhibits a saddle-point instability accompanied by a stable manifold. Mathematical analysis reveals that tumor dynamics can be controlled in a more effective and robust manner with the proposed protocol than with conventional IAS. We also discuss the clinical feasibility of the proposed protocol as an alternative to conventional IAS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuyuki Suzuki
- Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
| | - Daichi Sakai
- Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan
| | - Taishin Nomura
- Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan.
| | - Yoshito Hirata
- Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Aihara
- Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Merson S, Yang ZH, Brewer D, Olmos D, Eichholz A, McCarthy F, Fisher G, Kovacs G, Berney DM, Foster CS, Møller H, Scardino P, Cuzick J, Cooper CS, Clark JP. Focal amplification of the androgen receptor gene in hormone-naive human prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:1655-62. [PMID: 24481405 PMCID: PMC3960602 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2013] [Revised: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 12/19/2013] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen receptor (AR)-gene amplification, found in 20-30% of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa) is proposed to develop as a consequence of hormone-deprivation therapy and be a prime cause of treatment failure. Here we investigate AR-gene amplification in cancers before hormone deprivation therapy. METHODS A tissue microarray (TMA) series of 596 hormone-naive prostate cancers (HNPCas) was screened for chromosome X and AR-gene locus-specific copy number alterations using four-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation. RESULTS Both high level gain in chromosome X (≥4 fold; n=4, 0.7%) and locus-specific amplification of the AR-gene (n=6, 1%) were detected at low frequencies in HNPCa TMAs. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation mapping whole sections taken from the original HNPCa specimen blocks demonstrated that AR-gene amplifications exist in small foci of cells (≤ 600 nm, ≤1% of tumour volume). Patients with AR gene-locus-specific copy number gains had poorer prostate cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSION Small clonal foci of cancer containing high level gain of the androgen receptor (AR)-gene develop before hormone deprivation therapy. Their small size makes detection by TMA inefficient and suggests a higher prevalence than that reported herein. It is hypothesised that a large proportion of AR-amplified CRPCa could pre-date hormone deprivation therapy and that these patients would potentially benefit from early total androgen ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Merson
- Molecular Carcinogenesis, Institute of Cancer Research, Male Urological Cancer Research Centre, Surrey, UK
| | - Z H Yang
- The Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, St Bartholomew's Medical School, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
| | - D Brewer
- 1] Molecular Carcinogenesis, Institute of Cancer Research, Male Urological Cancer Research Centre, Surrey, UK [2] Department of Cancer Genetics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - D Olmos
- Prostate Cancer Research, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Melchor Fernández Almagro, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - A Eichholz
- Molecular Carcinogenesis, Institute of Cancer Research, Male Urological Cancer Research Centre, Surrey, UK
| | - F McCarthy
- Molecular Carcinogenesis, Institute of Cancer Research, Male Urological Cancer Research Centre, Surrey, UK
| | - G Fisher
- The Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, St Bartholomew's Medical School, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
| | - G Kovacs
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Medical Faculty, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D M Berney
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - C S Foster
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK and HCA Laboratories, London, UK
| | - H Møller
- 1] The Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, St Bartholomew's Medical School, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK [2] King's College London, Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | - P Scardino
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Cuzick
- The Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, St Bartholomew's Medical School, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
| | - C S Cooper
- Department of Cancer Genetics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - J P Clark
- Department of Cancer Genetics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Botrel TEA, Clark O, dos Reis RB, Pompeo ACL, Ferreira U, Sadi MV, Bretas FFH. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol 2014; 14:9. [PMID: 24460605 PMCID: PMC3913526 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2013] [Accepted: 01/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in older men in the United States (USA) and Western Europe. Androgen deprivation (AD) constitutes, in most cases, the first-line of treatment for these cases. The negative impact of CAD in quality of life, secondary to the adverse events of sustained hormone deprivation, plus the costs of this therapy, motivated the intermittent treatment approach. The objective of this study is to to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and adverse events profile of intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. METHODS Several databases were searched, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CENTRAL. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), time to progression (TTP) and adverse events. We performed a meta-analysis (MA) of the published data. The results were expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) or Risk Ratio (RR), with their corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CI 95%). RESULTS The final analysis included 13 trials comprising 6,419 patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. TTP was similar in patients who received intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) or continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) (fixed effect: HR = 1.04; CI 95% = 0.96 to 1.14; p = 0.3). OS and CSS were also similar in patients treated with IAD or CAD (OS: fixed effect: HR = 1.02; CI 95% = 0.95 to 1.09; p = 0.56 and CSS: fixed effect: HR = 1.06; CI 95% = 0.96 to 1.18; p = 0.26). CONCLUSION Overall survival was similar between IAD and CAD in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Data on CSS are weak and the benefits of IAD on this outcome remain uncertain. Impact in QoL was similar for both groups, however, sexual activity scores were higher and the incidence of hot flushes was lower in patients treated with IAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel
- Evidencias Scientific Credibility, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Comitê Brasileiro de Estudos em Uro-Oncologia (CoBEU), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Otávio Clark
- Evidencias Scientific Credibility, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
- Comitê Brasileiro de Estudos em Uro-Oncologia (CoBEU), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Ubirajara Ferreira
- Comitê Brasileiro de Estudos em Uro-Oncologia (CoBEU), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tombal B, Lecouvet F. Diagnosis and Management of Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Prostate Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118347379.ch13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
49
|
de la Taille A. Comment on "secondary chemoprevention of localized prostate cancer by short-term androgen deprivation to select indolent tumors suitable for active surveillance: a prospective pilot study". World J Urol 2014; 32:1625-6. [PMID: 24413818 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2013] [Accepted: 12/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A de la Taille
- INSERM U955Eq07, Department of Urology, CHU Mondor, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000, Créteil, France,
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Thelen P, Heinrich E, Bremmer F, Trojan L, Strauss A. Testosterone boosts for treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer: an experimental implementation of intermittent androgen deprivation. Prostate 2013; 73:1699-709. [PMID: 23868789 DOI: 10.1002/pros.22711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2013] [Accepted: 06/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary therapeutic target for non-organ-confined prostate cancer is the androgen receptor (AR). Main strategies to ablate AR function are androgen depletion and direct receptor blockade by AR antagonists. However, incurable castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) develops resistance mechanisms to cope with trace amounts of androgen including AR overexpression and mutation in the AR ligand binding domain. METHODS The CRPC cell model VCaP derivative of a prostate cancer bone metastasis was used in vitro and in nude mice in vivo to examine the effects of immediate testosterone boost on CRPC cells. In addition, a testosterone tolerant cell model was established by incremental acclimatization of VCaP cells to 1 nM testosterone. The effects of androgen withdrawal and testosterone boosts on gene expression were assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, ELISA, and Western blots. Tumor cell proliferation was evaluated with a BrdU test. RESULTS Testosterone boosts on CRPC VCaP cells eliminate tumor cells to a higher extent than androgen withdrawal in androgen tolerant cells. The pronounced decrease of tumor cell proliferation was accompanied by a marked downregulation of AR expression regarding full-length AR and splice variant AR V7. CONCLUSIONS Acquiring castration resistance of prostate cancer cells by AR overexpression and amplification obviously sensitizes such cells to testosterone concentrations as low as physiological values. This introduces novel therapeutic means to treat CRPC with non-toxic measures and may find clinical implementation in intermittent androgen deprivation regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Thelen
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|