Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Pediatr. May 8, 2016; 5(2): 151-158
Published online May 8, 2016. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.151
Table 1 Studies reporting the outcomes of antenatal steroid use in periviable births
Ref.Year publishedCountry of originNo. of babiesBirth weight(g)Gestational age (GA)MortalityOR (95%CI)IVHOR (95%CI)
Costeloe et al[10]2000United Kingdom811400-1000< 26 wk0.6 (0.34-0.89)0.39 (0.2-1.0)
Tyson et al[11]2008United States4446400-900< 26 wk0.6 (0.23-0.78)-
Hayes et al[12]2008United States450400-550< 23 wk0.3 (0.2-0.65)-
Mori et al[13]2011Japan11607400-1000< 26 wk0.7 (0.44-1.24)0.65 (0.21-1.68)
Bader et al[14]2010Israel3450400-1000< 26 wk0.6 (0.4-0.68)-
Carlo et al[15]2011United States10541400-100022-25 wk0.58 (0.52-0.65)0.55 (0.50-0.62)
Table 2 Overview of the results of the studies comparing continuous positive airway pressure and invasive ventilation
Ref.Total numberGestational age (GA) in wkDeath or BPDCPAPDeath or BPDnon CPAPDeath or BPD relative risk(95%CI)Days needing mechanical ventilationCPAPDays needing mechanical ventilationnon CPAPDays needing mechanical ventilationP value
Morley et al[51]61025-28108/307118/3030.9 (0.73-1.11)0-1111-14< 0.001
SUPPORT[52]131624-27323/663353/6530.9 (0.81-1.00)2-322-360.01
Sandri et al[54]20825-2853/10332/1051.01 (0.7-1.57)1-141-18< 0.01
Dunn et al[53]64826-2968/223138/4250.94 (0.74-1.19)1-81-100.01