Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Stomatol. Aug 20, 2013; 2(3): 56-61
Published online Aug 20, 2013. doi: 10.5321/wjs.v2.i3.56
Table 1 Mini-implants’ success and failure rates, and ORs statistics by host variables n (%)
VariablesSuccessFailureTotalP-valueOR (95%CI)
Gender0.231
Male96 (84.96)17 (15.04)113
Female252 (89.36)30 (10.64)2820.762 (0.354, 1.274)
Jaw0.019
Maxilla199 (91.71)18 (8.29)217
Mandible149 (83.71)29 (16.29)1782.152 (1.151, 4.021)
R/L side0.877
Left117 (88.50)23 (11.50)200
Right171 (87.69)24 (12.31)1951.080 (0.587, 1.986)
Age0.973
< 20106 (87.60)15 (12.40)121
20-30204 (88.31)27 (11.69)2310.935 (0.477, 1.834)
> 3038 (88.37)5 (11.63)430.930 (0.316, 2.732)
Gingival tissue< 0.001
AG165 (94.29)10 (5.71)1750.367 (0.163, 3.204)
MGJ109 (85.83)18 (14.17)1272.724 (1.212, 6.124)
MM73 (79.35)19 (20.65)924.294 (1.903, 9.689)1.576 (0.775, 3.204)
Table 2 Distribution of mini-implants according to gingival tissue type at the placement site in maxilla and mandible n (%)
Mandible
Maxilla
P-value
TotalFailedTotalFailed
Attached gingiva34 (19.1)4 (11.8)141 (65.3)6 (4.3)
Mucogingival junction78 (43.8)11 (14.1)49 (22.7)7 (14.3)< 0.001
Mucous membrane66 (37.1)14 (21.2)26 (12.0)5 (19.2)
Table 3 Independent comparison of failure rate between maxilla and mandible according to gingival tissue type n (%)
VariablesSuccessFailureTotalP-valueOR (95%CI)
Attached gingiva0.105
Maxilla135 (95.74)6 (4.26)141
Mandible30 (88.24)4 (11.76)343.000 (0.797, 11.293)
Mucogingival junction1
Maxilla42 (85.71)7 (14.29)49
Mandible67 (85.90)11 (14.10)780.985 (0.354, 2.740)
Mucous membrane1
Maxilla21 (80.77)5 (19.23)26
Mandible52 (78.79)14 (21.21)661.131 (0.362, 3.535)
Table 4 Regression analysis of factors affecting the failure rate of min-implants
BetaSEWaldP-valueExp (B)95%CI of Exp (B)
Gender0.4440.12412.744< 0.0011.5591.222-1.989
Jaw0.1070.1090.9560.3581.1130.898-1.378
R/L Side-0.0310.1070.0850.7710.9690.785-1.196
Age-0.0270.0840.1010.7510.9740.826-1.148
Gingival tissue0.1620.0695.5120.0121.1761.027-1.347