In the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), oral appliances are now being recognized as a valuable alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Various static imaging techniques of the upper airways allow for assessment of bone and soft tissue structures. However, static images do not capture dynamic airway characteristics. The aim of this paper was to review 4D imaging techniques in patients with OSA.

PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase were systematically searched for studies published before June 2022. The review was compliant with the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of each eligible study was critically evaluated by all four authors independently. Four unique articles with qualitative analyses were retrieved. All included studies had a clear objective/aim, an appropriate endpoint and sufficiently described eligibility criteria.

With dynamic imaging (4D) evaluation of the upper airway, the incidence of upper airway collapsibility due to use of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) was reduced, extraluminal tissue pressure was decreased and the space in the upper airway was increased, notably in the retropalatal and retroglossal areas of the airway. These findings suggest that MADs may be effective for OSA regardless of whether or not the obstruction site is in the velopharynx or oropharynx. However, further investigation of dynamic changes in the upper airway is required to explain the efficacy of OSA treatment and the underlying mechanisms.

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) constitute an alternative treatment in selected patients with OSA. A mandibular advanced position has been suggested to be beneficial, whereas its combination with an increased bite-raise may increase its adverse effects. The objective of this study was to assess upper airway (UA) volume and inspiratory pressure gradient variations in a group of 17 patients with OSA. The study was performed under 3 mandibular positions: intercuspal position (P1), MAD position in closed mouth (P2), and MAD position with an increased bite-raise (P3).

We conducted a 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pharynx using the finite element method via a computed tomography scan and the subsequent calculation using fluid-dynamic analysis.

One hundred percent of the patients showed an increase in UA volume in both P2 and the MAD position with an increased bite-raise, P2 being the position where 76.47% of the patients showed the largest UA volume. P2/velopharynx was the position/region where the largest UA volume increase was achieved (4.73 mm³). A better gradient in P2 (mean = 0.62) in 58.82% of the patients and a better gradient in P3 (mean = 0.74) in 41.18% of patients respect P1 was observed. In 82.35% of patients, a better volume-pressure gradient match was also found.

The best efficiency scores for both volume increase and better inspiratory pressure gradient were obtained in P2. This study findings suggest that in a MAD, the minimal bite opening position necessary for mandibular protrusion is more effective in increasing airway volume and inspiratory gradient compared to a larger bite-raising (15 mm).

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is the most common sleep disordered breathing disorder (SDB) in adults and is characterized by a recurrent partial or complete collapse of the upper airway during sleep. This can be caused by many factors, sometimes interacting, such as skeletal malformations, soft tissue crowding, respiratory instability and the various effects of aging, obesity and gender that dictate craniofacial and upper airway anatomy. Research has demonstrated that the majority of patients exhibit at least one anatomical component such as retrognathia or a narrow posterior airway space that predisposes to the development of OSAS. Within the predisposing elements for OSAS many seem to point to anatomical characteristics. A standardized and relatively simple radiologic technique to evaluate anatomical craniofacial relationships is cephalometry. This has been used already for a long time in orthodontics, but is now gradually being introduced in OSAS treatment to envisage optimal treatment selection as well as to predict treatment outcomes. The purpose of the present review is to evaluate the contribution of cephalometry in the prediction of outcomes from OSAS treatments that depend on the upper airway morphology in their mechanisms of action such as oral appliances that advance the mandible as well as various surgical methods. In addition, an overview of imaging modalities and methods that currently are being used in cephalometric analysis in OSAS patients is provided. The findings indicate that isolated cephalometric parameters cannot be used to reliably predict treatment outcomes from mandibular advancement devices and surgical methods for OSAS. Extreme or outlying values of cephalometric parameters may rather be used as contra-indicators or 'red flags' instead of predictors.

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used to identify the site of obstruction causing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, previous studies have reported a wide range of DISE findings, and new patterns of airway obstruction have also been observed during postoperative DISE. Therefore, we aimed to determine the features of changes in obstructive patterns during DISE.

Forty-two patients diagnosed with OSA underwent DISE for 25 min. Sites of obstruction were determined at the levels of the velum, lateral wall of the oropharynx, tongue base, and epiglottis. The velum obstruction configuration was classified as anteroposterior, lateral, or concentric.

The obstructive pattern changed in 14 patients (33%). We observed a change in the site of obstruction in 9 patients (21.4%) and in the configuration of velum obstruction in 5 patients (11.9%). The changes occurred between 3 and 22 min after commencing DISE (mean, 10.6 ± 6.2 min). The proportion of obstructions in the velum, lateral wall of the oropharynx, and tongue base increased with longer DISE durations. The proportion of multiple-level obstructions increased significantly after 15 min (P<0.05). In the velum, anteroposterior obstructions in 2 patients and lateral obstructions in 3 patients changed into concentric obstructions. More configurations were observed with longer procedure durations.

Hence, we assume that it is possible to miss the site of obstruction during DISE if the procedure is too short, which may partly explain the discrepancies between studies.

The aim of this study was to assess the value of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) using a custom-made simulation bite in maximal comfortable protrusion (MCP) of the mandible, in the prediction of treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a mandibular advancement device (MAD). Two hundred patients (74% male; age 46 ± 9 years; apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 19 ± 13 h(-1) sleep; body mass index [BMI] 27 ± 4 kg m(-2) ) with sleep-disordered breathing underwent DISE with a simulation bite in MCP. One hundred and thirty-five patients with an established diagnosis of OSA commenced MAD treatment. The associations between the findings during DISE with simulation bite and treatment outcome were evaluated. Treatment response was defined as a reduction in AHI following MAD treatment of ≥ 50% compared to baseline. Overall MAD treatment response in the studied population was 69%. The results of this study demonstrated a statistically significant association between a positive effect of the simulation bite on the upper airway patency during DISE and treatment response with MAD (P < 0.01). The results of this study suggest that the use of a simulation bite in maximal comfortable protrusion (MCP) of the mandible, as used during DISE in patients with OSA, tends to be effective in predicting treatment response of MAD treatment.

The treatment of choice in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Mandible advancement splint (MAS) offers an option for patients with mild or moderate OSA, who refuse or are unable to tolerate CPAP. The aim of the study was to find predictive factors in OSA for MAS therapy. The study group comprised 96 consecutive OSA patients who were sent for MAS therapy during 2008. Data were collected on the patients' general and dental condition, diagnosis, and treatment for OSA. Panoramic and cephalometric radiographs were analysed. The treatment compliance rate and problems with the use of the MAS were recorded. This rate was 57% and the significant affecting factors were protrusion of the mandible with MAS during the adaptation to the appliance as well as shorter maxillary and mandible lengths. The compliance of the MAS therapy was best in patients with short maxilla and mandible, which should be taken into consideration when planning MAS therapy for OSA patients. Finally, a sleep study should be part of the follow-up in this patient population.