To determine the effects of repeated placement of quantified lyophilised platelet-rich plasma (LPRP) on the soft and hard tissue components.

Lyophilised platelet-rich plasma was topically placed, and later injected, into fresh sockets using the third molar surgical model, randomised according to the split-mouth approach. The control site received placebo. The application of LPRP was done intraoperatively, one month and two months postoperatively. The measured endpoints included post-operative pain, swelling, trismus, pocket depth at mid-distal adjacent second molar, soft tissue healing, and bone formation (which was assessed radiographically). Fifteen healthy young adults, aged between 21 and 35 years, visiting the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic at the University of Malaya were recruited for this study.

There was no significant difference in post-operative pain, swelling size, trismus, and bone healing within their specific timelines during this study. However, the LPRP group showed significant reduction in pocket depth at the two-month post-operative period, suggesting that LPRP improves soft tissue healing.

Soft tissue healing, measured as the change of periodontal pocket depth, showed significant reduction, suggesting the benefit of LPRP for soft tissue healing. However, bone regeneration and reduction of post-operative sequelae showed no improvement even after quantification and repeated LPRP application.

• beta triphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP)
• platelet-rich fibrin (PRF-L)
• post-extraction socket
• ridge augmentation

• CTS-138 Junta de Andalucía
• CTS-1028 Junta de Andalucía

• clinical attachment level
• decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft
• infrabony defect
• platelet-rich plasma
• pocket depth

Background. Surgical removal of mandibular third molars results in pain, swelling and bony defects, causing prolonged postoperative recovery. The growth factors present in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can accelerate the healing, thereby shortening postoperative recovery period. This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of PRP in postoperative socket healing, pain, swelling and bone regeneration following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Methods. The present case‒control study was conducted on 20 patients with identical bilateral mandibular third molar impaction. PRP was placed randomly on one side of 3rd molar extraction socket and the contralateral side was used as control. Evaluation of soft tissue healing, pain, swelling and radiologic bone density was carried out.

Results. Soft tissue healing was better in the PRP compared to the control site. Immediate postoperative assessment of pain scores showed no significant difference between the two groups (Mann-Whitney U test). On the 7th day, pain scores were lower in case site compared to the control site. Measurement of swelling on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day showed statistically significant differences between the case and control sites (P<0.0001). Postoperative mean bone density at the 3rd and 6th postoperative months was significantly higher in the case site compared to the control site (P=0.00001).

Conclusion. The results showed an improvement in wound healing and swelling and an increase in the bone density at PRP site. The growth factors in PRP would improve the hard and soft tissue healing 3 months after molar surgery.

• Extraction
• pain
• platelet-rich plasma
• soft tissue healing
• swelling
• third molar

Background

Chronic non-healing ulcers are a frequent problem in developing countries and represent a heavy burden to the patients because they lack the necessary growth factors (GFs) to maintain the healing process and are frequently complicated by super, added infections. Traditional therapies, such as regular dressings and wound debridement, cannot provide satisfactory results since these treatments are not able to provide the necessary GFs. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) helps in enhancing the wound healing by releasing various GFs. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of PRP dressing in the treatment of chronic non-healing ulcers.

Methods

Patients attending the outpatient department on a regular basis and those admitted as inpatients for chronic wound management were included in the study. It was an observational study done in a tertiary health center for a period of one year. All patients with eligible criteria were treated with PRP at twice-weekly intervals for a maximum of 10 dressings. At the end of the five weeks period, the reduction in the size of the ulcers (area and volume) was assessed.

Results

A total of 104 cases with chronic non-healing ulcers of various causes were treated with homologous PRP twice weekly for a maximum of 10 dressings. In those 104 patients, non-healing ulcers in 85 patients (81.73%) were healed at the end of the last dressing. Non-healing ulcers in 13 patients (12.5%) were healed with skin grafting. Among those patients, the baseline mean ulcer area was 5.03 cm². For each visit, there was a reduction in the ulcer area. At the end of the last visit, the mean ulcer area was 1.69 cm², which was significant in this study.

Conclusion

Due to the lack of necessary GFs in chronic non-healing ulcers, PRP is safe and enhances the healing rates of chronic wounds, thereby reducing overall hospital stay and morbidity.

• chronic ulcers
• homologous
• non healing ulcers
• platelets rich plasma

• Alveolar osteitis
• bone morphogenetic protein
• case–control study
• extraction
• plasma-rich growth factors
• platelet-rich plasma

To compare the efficacy of Platelet rich plasma and synthetic graft material for bone regeneration after bilateral third molar extraction.

This study was conducted in 10 patients visiting the outpatient department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental College & Hospital. Patients requiring extraction of bilateral mandibular third molars were taken for the study. Following extraction, PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) was placed in one extraction socket and synthetic graft material in form granules [combination of Hydroxyapatite (HA) and Bioactive glass (BG)] in another extraction socket. The patients were assessed for postoperative pain and soft tissue healing. Radiological assessment of the extraction site was done at 8, 12 and 16 weeks interval to compare the change in bone density in both the sockets.

Pain was less on PRP site when compared to HA site. Soft tissue evaluation done using gingival healing index given by Landry et al showed better healing on PRP site when compared to HA site. The evaluation of bone density by radiological assessment showed the grey level values calculated at 4 months at the PRP site were comparatively higher than HA site.

The study showed that the platelet rich plasma is a better graft material than synthetic graft material in terms of soft tissue and bone healing. However a more elaborate study with a larger number of clinical cases is very much essential to be more conclusive regarding the efficacy of both the materials.

• Bioactive glass
• bone density
• hydroxyapatite
• mandibular third molar extraction
• pain
• platelet rich plasma

The aim of this article is to review the outcomes of platelet preparations in dentistry. A structured electronic search discovered 348 articles, which described the use of autologous platelet concentrates with a relevance to clinical dentistry. Among these articles, 220 articles investigated platelet rich plasma, 99 investigated platelet rich fibrin, 22 investigated plasma rich in growth factors and 7 investigated the use of concentrated growth factors. Several studies reported beneficial treament outcomes in terms of enhanced bone and soft tissue regeneration.

• Platelet concentrates
• Platelet rich plasma
• Platelet rich fibrin
• Concentrated growth factors
• Growth factors
• Dentistry
• Plasma rich in growth factors

• bone healing
• hydroxyapatite
• platelet rich plasma

• Autologous
• Bone density
• Growth factors
• Platelet-rich plasma
• Soft tissue healing

• Bone density
• Pain
• Platelet rich fibrin
• Soft tissue healing