Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Respirol. Jan 17, 2019; 9(1): 1-7
Published online Jan 17, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1
Table 1 Short term randomized control trial investigating the effects of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on cardiac functions in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, yearDurationnDesignFindings
Naughton, 1995[7]1 mo25no-CSA vs CPAP vs CSA-controlUrine and plasma NE↓, LVEF↑, NYHA class↓
Naughton, 1995[8]3 mo29no-CSA vs CPAP vs CSA-controlLVEF↑, improve symptoms
Granton, 1996[30]3 mo17CPAP vs CSA-controlMIP↑, LVEF↑, improve symptoms
Tkacova, 1997[9]3 mo17CPAP vs CSA-controlLVEF↑, Mitral regurgitant fraction↓, plasma ANP↓
Table 2 Short term randomized control trial investigating the effects of adaptive servo ventilation treatment on cardiac functions in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, yearDurationnDesignFindings
Pepperell, 2003[31]1 mo30Therapeutic mv-ASV vs subtherapeutic mv-ASVPlasma BNP↓, urinary metadrenaline↓
Philippe, 2006[11]6 mo25CPAP vs mv-ASVSignificant increase in LVEF and improvement in QOL in ASV group
Fietze, 2008[32]1.5 mo37bi-level PAP with standard S/T mode vs mv-ASV modeLVEF increased more in the bi-level PAP group. Daytime blood pressure and heart rate did not change
Kasai, 2013[10]3 mo23CPAP vs pf-ASVLVEF increased more in the ASV group
O’Connor, 2017[21] (CAT-HF trial)16 mo126SDB-control vs mv-ASVNo significant cardiac improvement found
Table 3 Long term randomized control trials investigating the effects of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, yearDurationnDesignFindings
Sin, 2000[12]2.2 yr (median)66No-CSA-control vs no-CSA-CPAP vs CSA-CPAP vs CSA-controlMortality-cardiac transplantation rate↓ who complied with CPAP, LVEF↑ in CSA-CPAP group
Bradley, 2005[13] (CANPAP trial)2 yr (mean)258CSA-control vs CPAPPlasma NE↓, LVEF↑, distance in a 6-min walk test↑
Arzt, 2007[14] (Post hoc analysis of CANPAP trial)23 mo (mean)210CSA-control vs CPAPPatients whose AHI < 15 events/h by CPAP had significantly improved transplant-free survival and greater improvement in LVEF compared with control
Table 4 Long term randomized control trial investigating the effects of adaptive servo ventilation treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, yearDurationnDesignFindings
Cowie, 2015[15] (SERVE-HF trial)31 mo (median)1325mv-ASV vs CSA-controlAll-cause and cardiovascular mortality were both increased in ASV group