Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 10, 2012; 1(4): 46-54
Published online Dec 10, 2012. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v1.i4.46
Trends in cervical cancer screening in developing countries
S Jegajeeva Rao
S Jegajeeva Rao, Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
S Jegajeeva Rao, School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
S Jegajeeva Rao, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selayang Campus, Jalan Prima Selayang 7, 68100 Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
Author contributions: Rao SJ contributed solely to this work.
Supported by fellowships from the Prime Minister of Australia Asia Endeavour Award, Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia and University Technologi MARA, Malaysia
Correspondence to: S Jegajeeva Rao, BMed (Hons), MD, MRCOG, MFMLM, CORT-GO, Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia. doctorjega@hotmail.com
Telephone: +61-2-93826287 Fax: +61-2-93826200
Received: June 22, 2012
Revised: September 3, 2012
Accepted: October 23, 2012
Published online: December 10, 2012
Abstract

Developing countries suffer the highest burden of cervical cancers but have the lowest resources. Effective cervical cytology screening programme, along with a network of diagnostic and therapeutic colposcopy centres, like developed countries, is almost impossible to be reproduced in developing countries. Visual inspection methods [e.g., Visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine (VILI) and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)] which are cheaper, require less expertise and have the advantage of possible treatment in one setting have been shown to be effective alternatives. The sensitivity to detect CIN2+, by VIA and VILI, have been shown to be 80% and 91% respectively, with a specificity rate of 92% and 85% respectively. Screening by human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has high sensitivity (96.4%) but low specificity (94.1%) to detect CIN2+, when compared to Pap Smear (sensitivity, 55.4% and specificity, 96.8%). A single lifetime HPV testing in a large unscreened population has been shown to significantly reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality when compared to cervical cytology, VIA or no screening. HPV testing of self-collected vaginal specimens also helps to overcome religious and socio-cultural barriers towards pelvic examination amongst women in developing countries. Current HPV testing methods are expensive, skill/infrastructure demanding and takes time to produce results. A cheaper HPV test, called careHPV™, which is able to provide results within 2.5 h and requires minimal skill/infrastructure to operate, was designed for use in developing countries. One stop screen and treat facilities using VIA or rapid HPV testing, and cryotherapy, can overcome non-compliance to follow-up which is a major issue in developing countries. Cure rates of 81.4% for CIN1, 71.4% for CIN2 and 68.0% for CIN3 at 6 mo after treatment have been reported. Incorporating telemedicine with cervicography of VIA or VILI or even telecolposcopy, has great potential in cervical cancer screening, especially in countries with vast geographical areas.

Keywords: Cervical cancer, Screening, Cytology, Visual inspection with acetic acid, Visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine, Human papillomavirus