1
|
Saito GH, Nishikawa DRC, de Oliveira AS, Fairbanks PJ, Moreira Mendes AA, Prado MP. Results of Lisfranc Injuries Treated With Interosseous Suture Button Fixation With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Foot Ankle Int 2025; 46:506-513. [PMID: 40077945 DOI: 10.1177/10711007251322166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis are considered gold standards for treating Lisfranc injuries. However, several drawbacks are associated with these procedures, such as joint motion loss and potential cartilage damage. More recently, the suture button emerged as an alternative treatment for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries, which can be used either alone or in combination with traditional techniques, with the potential to mitigate some of these potential disadvantages. The primary outcome of the present study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of 20 patients treated with the suture button technique for Lisfranc injuries over a medium- to long-term follow-up period. The secondary outcome was to assess and describe the complications associated with this procedure. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on 20 patients who underwent operation for acute Lisfranc injuries using the interosseous suture button technique between 2013 and 2019. The mean follow-up was 83 months (range 60-126). Clinical evaluation involved the assessment of complications, reoperations, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scores, patient satisfaction, and ability to return to previous activities. Radiographic analysis was performed aiming to evaluate reduction maintenance and osteoarthritis development. RESULTS Patients demonstrated excellent outcomes with an average VAS of 0.50 and a mean AOFAS midfoot score of 95.5. Incomplete reduction was the only factor we identified influencing lower VAS and AOFAS scores. Most complications were minor and solved with conservative treatment. More serious complications, such as loss of reduction and posttraumatic arthritis were observed in 2 patients each. CONCLUSION In this small series with a relatively long follow-up, we found that the use of an interosseous suture button technique was a reliable method to treat acute Lisfranc injuries, resulting in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. However, outcomes including posttraumatic arthritis and loss of reduction raise remain of concern.
Collapse
|
2
|
Feldman MW, Fucaloro S, Krivicich L, Kent S, Salzler MJ. Studies directly comparing Lisfranc injuries treated with primary arthrodesis or open reduction and internal fixation show no significant difference in return to sport and complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2025; 64:318-327. [PMID: 40020966 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2025.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Revised: 01/18/2025] [Accepted: 02/22/2025] [Indexed: 03/03/2025]
Abstract
Lisfranc injuries are common and can cause sport-ending morbidity. Management through primary arthrodesis (PA) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a subject of debate. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science databases were queried for studies assessing return to sport (RTS) outcomes following treatment of Lisfranc injuries with PA or ORIF. RTS rates, time to RTS, and complication rates were assessed. Maximum likelihood random-effects models were created based on comparative studies to evaluate differences in RTS and complication rates with odds ratios representing pooled estimates. Heterogeneity of return to sport outcomes was explored with sub-analysis of athlete level (non-elite vs. elite) and type of fixation. Across 23 studies, 603 Lisfranc injuries were identified; 498 underwent ORIF and 105 received PA. Return to sport ranged from 65 to 100 % in ORIF subjects and 67-100 % of PA subjects. Meta-analysis of comparative studies reveals no significant difference in likelihood of RTS or complications (p = 0.44 I2=26 %; p = 0.93 I2=0 %, respectively). RTS times range from 8 to 30 weeks for ORIF and 19.7-28.5 weeks for PA. Studies assessing RTS following ORIF and PA for Lisfranc injuries are heterogeneous, yet pooled data from comparative evidence suggests no significant difference in likelihood of RTS or complications. PA and ORIF have the potential for successful RTS though further prospective randomized studies are needed to better counsel athletes regarding the ideal surgical management for patient goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Fucaloro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston MA 02111; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston MA 02111
| | - Laura Krivicich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston MA 02111
| | - Suzanne Kent
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston MA 02111
| | - Matthew J Salzler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston MA 02111; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston MA 02111
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bowlby MA. Subtle Lisfranc Injuries. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2025; 42:207-221. [PMID: 39988388 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2024.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
Subtle Lisfranc injuries are commonly overlooked, and the severity of the injury is often underestimated. Lisfranc injuries can cause severe pain and debilitation if missed and not treated. Patients with midfoot pain following even a minor trauma should be evaluated for a Lisfranc injury with bilateral weightbearing radiographs when they are able to tolerate. There should be a low threshold for open reduction with internal fixation in the active, healthy patient population. Surgical technique is described. Primary fusion may be considered in more severe cases as well as those where the diagnosis is delayed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda A Bowlby
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Foot and Ankle Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 2500 Merced Street, 4th Floor, San Leandro, CA 94577, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pearsall C, Arciero E, Gupta P, Bäcker H, Tantigate D, Trofa DP, Vosseller JT. Defining Operative Indications in Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review. Foot Ankle Spec 2024; 17:632-638. [PMID: 37278226 DOI: 10.1177/19386400231175376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to determine operative indications for Lisfranc injuries. METHODS A systematic review using a MEDLINE literature search was performed using the index "Lisfranc Injury" from 1980 onward using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines where applicable. Inclusion criteria were all clinical studies reporting on the management of Lisfranc injuries obtained via the search index, including case reports, review articles, cohort studies, and randomized trials. Non-English-language articles, inaccessible articles, those not relevant to the management of Lisfranc injuries (biomechanical, cadaveric, and technique articles), and those that did not explicitly state operative indications (vague or absent indications) were excluded. RESULTS After identifying 737 studies, the full text of 391 studies was reviewed, and 58 reports providing explicit operative indications were included in the final analysis. Fifty-one (81.1%) studies provided diastasis cutoffs varying ≥2 mm (35/58; 60.4%), ≥1 mm (13; 22.4%), and ≥3 mm (3; 5.2%); the diastasis location was most commonly unspecified (31/58; 53.5%) or varied between combinations of metatarsal, tarsal, cuboid, and cuneiform bones (20/58; 27.6%). Specific imaging criteria for surgery included an avulsion fracture or fleck sign (3/58; 5.2%), arch height loss (3/58; 5.2%), and a tear on magnetic resonance imaging (5; 8.6%). The 11 (19%) studies defining operative indications in terms of classification schemes used the Nunley and Vertullo (8/58; 13.8%), Myerson (2; 3.5%), and Buehren (1; 1.7%) systems. Twenty-one (36.2%) studies provided multiple operative indications. CONCLUSION The most common Lisfranc operative indications among the limited reporting studies varied from a 1- to 3-mm diastasis across several locations. It is imperative for operative indications to be reported with an increased frequency and in a homogenous fashion to guide the clinical management of these subtle injuries. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE Level IV; systematic Review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Pearsall
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Emily Arciero
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Puneet Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Henrik Bäcker
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - David P Trofa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi JY, Suh JS, Jung YH. Effect of dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base fracture on residual diastases in acute lisfranc fracture-dislocation. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2024; 48:2911-2921. [PMID: 39297967 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06320-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinico-radiographic outcomes between two techniques for acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocation with a large, displaced second metatarsal base plantar fracture: isolated Lisfranc screw fixation versus Lisfranc joint fixation with dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base. METHODS We retrospectively compared the clinico-radiographic outcome between patients who underwent isolated Lisfranc screw fixation (Group 1, 26 patients) and those who underwent Lisfranc joint fixation with dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base (Group 2, 23 patients). The main outcome measurements were the postoperative distance between the medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base on standing anteroposterior foot radiographs, known as the C1-M2 distance. Residual diastasis was defined as C1-M2 distance ≥ 2 mm on the affected side compared with that on the contralateral side. We also assessed the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)-activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscale scores at three, six and ≥ 18 months postoperatively. RESULTS At the final follow-up, the mean C1-M2 distance on the affected side compared with that on the contralateral side was significantly greater in Group 1 than in Group 2 (3.9 versus 0.7 mm, P = 0.027). Furthermore, Group 1 showed a higher incidence of residual diastases at the final follow-up (69.2%) than the Group 2 (13.0%, P < 0.001). The FAAM-ADL scores at the final follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.518), but the FAAM Sports score was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The postoperative C1-M2 distance was better maintained with Lisfranc joint fixation with dorsoplantar miniscrew fixation of the second metatarsal base than with isolated Lisfranc screw fixation. We recommend that surgeons exercise caution when dealing with a second metatarsal plantar fracture and consider performing secure fixation using the dorsoplantar miniscrew technique for improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Young Choi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, 170 Juhwa-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
| | - Jin Soo Suh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, 170 Juhwa-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Young Ho Jung
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, 170 Juhwa-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cardenas C, McIver ND, Nelson J, Ahmad A, Chavez T, Gross J, Salas C, Gavin K. The Use of Knotless Suture Tape Construct vs Screw Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study. Foot Ankle Int 2024; 45:896-904. [PMID: 38798115 PMCID: PMC11382486 DOI: 10.1177/10711007241250024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lisfranc injuries are often treated with open reduction and internal fixation using rigid fixation techniques. The use of flexible fixation to stabilize the Lisfranc joint is a newer technique. The purpose of this cadaveric study is to compare the amount of diastasis at the Lisfranc interval under diminished physiologic loads when treated with a knotless suture tape construct and a solid screw. METHODS Ten cadavers (20 feet) had native motion at the intact Lisfranc interval assessed at multiple increasing loads (69, 138, and 207 N). The Lisfranc ligamentous complex was then disrupted, and testing repeated to evaluate the amount of diastasis. Randomization was performed to determine the type of fixation for each cadaver: solid screw or knotless suture tape construct. Once fixation was completed, specimens were cyclically loaded for 10 000 cycles at loads, and diastasis was quantified after each load cycle to compare the interventions. Diastasis was measured using motion tracking cameras and retroreflective marker sets. A non-inferiority statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS Diastasis mean values were confirmed to be >2 mm for all load bearing conditions in the injury model. Posttreatment, diastasis was significantly reduced when compared to the sectioned conditions (P < .01) for both treatment options. Non-inferiority analyses showed that the knotless suture tape construct did not perform inferior to screw fixation for diastasis at the Lisfranc interval at any of the compared load states. CONCLUSION Under the loads tested, there is no significant difference in diastasis at the Lisfranc interval when treating ligamentous Lisfranc injuries with a knotless suture tape construct or solid screws. Both reduced diastasis from the injured state and were not different from the intact state. CLINICAL RELEVANCE In this cadaveric model with ligamentous Lisfranc injury, diastasis of a knotless suture tape construct is compared to solid screw fixation as tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesar Cardenas
- The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Natalia D McIver
- The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Jessica Nelson
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Aamir Ahmad
- The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Tyler Chavez
- The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Jessica Gross
- The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Christina Salas
- The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Katherine Gavin
- The Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoskins M, Wise P, Unangst A, Shaheen P, Kreulen C, Aynardi M, Giza E. Early Outcomes of Lisfranc Injuries Treated with Arthrex InternalBrace: A Case Series. Indian J Orthop 2024; 58:257-262. [PMID: 38425825 PMCID: PMC10899141 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01097-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The treatment of Lisfranc injuries continues to evolve with time. The purpose of this study was to report early outcomes of patients with Lisfranc ligamentous injuries treated with the Arthrex InternalBrace, which has benefits to other previously described techniques. Materials and methods We retrospectively identified 15 adult patients with Lisfranc injuries that were treated via open reduction internal fixation with the Arthrex InternalBrace (Naples, Fl). These patients were identified at two separate United States institutions between 2019 and 2022. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, and concomitant foot injuries were recorded. Outcomes were assessed by return-to-work or sport and time to weight-bearing. Secondary complications or revision surgeries were noted. Results The mean patient age was 35 years. Eight patients had isolated Lisfranc ligamentous injuries and seven had additional intercuneiform instability, which required a supplemental limb of the fixation device. The most common mechanism of injury was a cutting/pivoting maneuver (n = 5) followed by fall (n = 4). The mean radiographic follow-up time was 7.3 months. The average time to weight-bearing as tolerated was 6.6 weeks (± 2.2). The average time to return-to-work/sport as tolerated was 14.1 weeks (± 3.6). Only two minor complications were noted at follow-up but no major complications or revision surgeries occurred. Conclusions The outcomes of this case series suggest that the Arthrex InternalBrace is a viable option when performing open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc ligamentous injuries. Future prospective studies are needed to directly compare this device with alternative fixation methods. Graphical Abstract
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meloria Hoskins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State Hershey Bone and Joint Institute, 30 Hope Dr Suite 2400, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
| | - Patrick Wise
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Academic Offices 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA USA
| | - Alicia Unangst
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Academic Offices 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA USA
| | - Philip Shaheen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Academic Offices 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA USA
| | - Christopher Kreulen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Academic Offices 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA USA
| | - Michael Aynardi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State Hershey Bone and Joint Institute, 30 Hope Dr Suite 2400, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
| | - Eric Giza
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Academic Offices 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lachance AD, Giro ME, Edelstein A, Lee W. Suture button fixation yields high levels of patient reported outcomes, return to sport, and stable fixation in isolated Lisfranc injuries: A systematic review. J ISAKOS 2023; 8:474-483. [PMID: 37611870 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Lisfranc injuries remain a significant, but often misdiagnosed, orthopaedic injury. Alongside the traditional methods of surgical fixation, including arthrodesis and open reduction and internal fixation with screws, suture button fixation is an emerging technique. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of suture button fixation for treatment of Lisfranc injuries through a systematic review. EVIDENCE REVIEW A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for original, English-language studies observing outcomes of Lisfranc injury until August 19, 2022. The clinical studies with evidence level I-IV and at least a 12 month follow-up after the index surgery were included if they examined quantifiable outcomes of Lisfranc injury treated with suture button. Articles were excluded if they included case reports, systematic reviews, comments, editorials, surveys, animal studies, or biomechanical/cadaveric studies. Variables extracted from text and figures include demographic information, return to sport measures, patient reported outcomes, and complications. FINDINGS Of the 10 studies included, there were 186 total patients with an age range of 13-72. In every study, all patients were able to return to sport or activity with a return time averaging from 10.8 to 25.9 weeks. Postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores ranged from 83.5 to 97.0 while pain Visual Analogue Scale ranged from 0.6 to 2.5. Complications were reported in four studies at a rate of 7.7% including two cases of diastasis, two cases of paraesthesia, one case of button irritation, and one of postoperative degenerative joint disease, with no reported revisions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In our systematic review, suture button fixation shows high levels of patient reported outcomes, return to sport, and stable fixation in isolated Lisfranc injuries. This surgical technique provides a physiologic reduction across the Lisfranc joint and reduces the need for reoperation including removal of hardware. However, further evidence such as large sample size high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed to draw a definitive conclusion regarding the best treatment for Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Systematic Review of Level III and IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Lachance
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| | - Margaret Elizabeth Giro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| | - Alexander Edelstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| | - Wonyong Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guthrie Clinic, 1 Guthrie Sq, Sayre, PA, 18840, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chona DV, Park CN, Kim BI, Lau BC. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes of Suture Button Fixation for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231186387. [PMID: 37538534 PMCID: PMC10395171 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231186387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Flexible ligamentous fixation has increased in popularity for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury, but the optimal fixation strategy is unclear. Purpose To review the biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic results of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated with flexible fixation. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for clinical and biomechanical (cadaveric) studies relating to flexible fixation of ligamentous Lisfranc injury. Outcomes of interest included patient-reported outcome scores, clinical/biomechanical results, radiographic alignment, and return to activity. Where appropriate, meta-analysis of the postoperative outcomes was performed. Results Of the 34 initial studies, 14 articles (243 feet) were included in the analysis. In the 11 clinical studies (216 patients), the mean postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was 90.1 (n = 150; 6 studies) and the mean visual analog scale score was 1.5 (n = 137; 5 studies). The rate of return to activity was 100% (n = 35; 5 studies), and 100% of patients maintained radiographic alignment postoperatively (n = 62; 6 studies). No complications or subsequent hardware removals were reported. Of the 3 biomechanical studies (27 feet), 1 study found significantly greater change in diastasis under axial load between intact and postfixation ligaments with suture button versus screw fixation (+1.1 vs -0.1 mm; P < .05), another found no difference in the decrease in diastasis under axial load between the injured state and screw or suture button fixation (1.2 vs 1.0 mm; P = .5), and the third found no difference in displacement between intact and either screw or suture button fixation under either axial (intact vs screw: 1.0 vs 2.0 mm, P = .1; intact vs suture button: 0.6 vs 1.8 mm, P = .1) or abduction (intact vs screw: 1.5 vs 1.1 mm, P = .5; intact vs suture button: 1.3 vs 2.1 mm, P = .1) load. Conclusion Flexible fixation use in the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury was found to have significant potential as a fixation option, as demonstrated by excellent clinical results. Biomechanical evidence was inconclusive but suggested a trend toward decreased diastasis in specimens fixed with screws compared with suture buttons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak V. Chona
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Caroline N. Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Billy I. Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brian C. Lau
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yi Y, Chaudhari S. Various Flexible Fixation Techniques Using Suture Button for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries: A Review of Surgical Options. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1134. [PMID: 37374337 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Contrary to Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocation, ligamentous Lisfranc injury can lead to additional instability and arthritis and is difficult to diagnose. Appropriate procedure selection is necessary for a better prognosis. Several surgical methods have recently been introduced. Here, we present three distinct surgical techniques for treating ligamentous Lisfranc employing flexible fixation. First is the "Single Tightrope procedure", which involves reduction and fixation between the second metatarsal base and the medial cuneiform via making a bone tunnel and inserting Tightrope. Second is the "Dual Tightrope Technique", which is similar to the "Single Tightrope technique", with additional fixation of an intercuneiform joint using one MiniLok Quick Anchor Plus. Last but not least, the "internal brace approach" uses the SwiveLock anchor, particularly when intercueniform instability is seen. Each approach has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of surgical complexity and stability. These flexible fixation methods, on the other hand, are more physiologic and have the potential to lessen the difficulties that have been linked to the use of conventional screws in the past.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Yi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Foot and Ankle Center, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, 85, 2-ga, Jeo-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul 04551, Republic of Korea
| | - Sagar Chaudhari
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, K. B. Bhabha Hospital, Bandra, Mumbai 400050, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Choi JY, Yu OJ, Suh JS. Factors influencing postoperative residual diastasis after the operative treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:2685-2694. [PMID: 34244876 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04058-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinically, surgeons may frequently encounter residual diastasis between the medial cuneiform and 2nd metatarsal base after the operative treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture dislocations. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing postoperative residual diastasis. We specifically focused on the preoperative fracture pattern using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Radiographic and clinical findings of 66 patients who underwent operative treatment for acute Lisfranc fracture dislocation were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to residual diastasis evaluated by weight-bearing anteroposterior radiograph of the foot at the final follow-up. Residual diastasis was defined as distance between the medial cuneiform and 2nd metatarsal base greater than the distance on the contralateral side by 2 mm or more. Demographic parameters and fracture patterns based on preoperative foot 3D-CT were compared. A paired t test was used to compare continuous numeric parameters, while a Chi-square test was used for the proportional parameters. Statistical significance was set at P value less than 0.05 for all analyses. RESULTS The mean age at operation, sex, body mass index, and the rate of underlying diabetes were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05 each). Preoperative foot 3D-CT evaluation showed that the rate of large (> 25% of 2nd tarsometatarsal joint involvement), displaced (> 2 mm) fracture fragments on the plantar side of the 2nd metatarsal base was more pronounced in the group with residual diastasis (P = 0.001), while medial wall avulsion of the 2nd metatarsal base was more frequent in the group without residual diastasis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS While treating acute Lisfranc injuries, surgeons should be aware of the presence of a 2nd metatarsal base plantar fracture. A dorsoplantar inter-fragmentary fixation can be considered if the fragment is large and displaced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Young Choi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Oh Jun Yu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Jin Soo Suh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sullivan M, Peckston D, Alpuerto B. Shortening the Return-to-Play Times in Elite Athletes With Unstable Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries Using a Knotless Interosseous Suture Button: Case Series and Literature Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221102969. [PMID: 35757241 PMCID: PMC9218474 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221102969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Isolated unstable Lisfranc ligament injuries in elite athletes are associated with a lengthy period of rehabilitation and prolonged absence from competition. Purpose: To assess the efficacy of a knotless, interosseous suture button system for repairing isolated unstable ligamentous Lisfranc injuries and its capacity to allow accelerated rehabilitation with earlier weightbearing and return-to-play times in elite athletes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed data from a prospectively compiled database for elite athletes treated by a single surgeon. All included patients had clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of an unstable isolated complete ligamentous Lisfranc injury requiring surgical reduction and stabilization. All patients underwent surgery using a knotless interosseous suture button to achieve stabilization, followed by a standardized postoperative regimen involving full weightbearing at 4 weeks, and all had a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years. Results: Included were 12 patients: 7 National Rugby League (NRL) players, 2 professional dancers, 1 Olympic gymnast, 1 professional wakeboarder, and 1 professional NRL referee. The mean age of the patients was 21.1 years (range, 16-34 years). Ten patients underwent acute surgical stabilization within 3 weeks of the injury, and 2 patients sustained chronic isolated Lisfranc instability that was initially treated nonoperatively. All athletes were able to return to full weightbearing by 4 weeks postoperatively, successfully returned to training by 9 to 12 weeks, and returned to full competition by 12 to 16 weeks. No major complications were reported. Conclusion: Knotless interosseous suture button stabilization was a reliable treatment option for both acute and chronic isolated ligamentous Lisfranc injuries in these elite athletes. This technique does not require hardware removal, allows early weightbearing with accelerated rehabilitation, and may shorten the return-to-play interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Sullivan
- St. Vincent’s Clinic, Sydney, Australia
- Martin Sullivan, FRACS, FAOrth, St. Vincent’s Clinic, 438 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia ()
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Paek S, Mo M, Hogue G. Treatment of paediatric Lisfranc injuries: A systematic review and introduction of a novel treatment algorithm. J Child Orthop 2022; 16:198-207. [PMID: 35800659 PMCID: PMC9254024 DOI: 10.1177/18632521221092957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric Lisfranc injuries (PLI) are rare injuries that have few studies published about their occurrence and treatment in pediatric population. Due to this lack of information, the diagnostic criteria and surgical or non-surgical methods for treatment have not been clearly established within the pediatric orthopedic literature. The objective of this study was to review the published literature related to treatment options and develop a concise stepwise treatment algorithm for pediatric patients presenting with Lisfranc injuries. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed to find studies discussing the treatment of PLI with reported long-term outcomes. Data collection accounted for the mechanism of injury, diagnostic imaging modality used, injury type, fracture classification using the Myerson system, treatment method used, and postoperative complications. RESULTS An initial PubMed search revealed 290 articles, but only 10 studies fulfilled the criteria for in-depth review. A total of 114 patients were included in this review from the selected case reports and case series studies. Primary treatment methods were as follows: 44% (50/114) with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using Kirschner wires (K-wires) and/or screws, 3% (3/114) with closed reduction percutaneous fixation (CRPF), 4% (4/114) with suture-button constructs, 20% (23/114) with cast immobilization, and 29% (33/114) were described as not requiring reduction. CONCLUSION There were two main limitations to this study. First, there are few published studies with longitudinal outcomes of PLI treatment. Second, some case series did not disclose which procedure a patient with post-treatment complications underwent. Therefore, an overall statistical analysis of success and failure rates with associated complications of each procedure could not be conducted. In conclusion, we found that a stepwise approach to evaluating conservative and surgical treatment options based on the presentation of the PLI should be utilized to optimize long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Paek
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of
Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA,Samuel Paek, Geisinger Commonwealth School
of Medicine, 615 Clay Ave Apt 1, Scranton, PA 18510, USA.
| | - Michelle Mo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,
USA,Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Grant Hogue
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,
USA,Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Perez MT, Owen JR, Wayne JS. Computational analysis of the clinical presentation of a ligamentous Lisfranc injury. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:2725-2731. [PMID: 33620124 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Lisfranc injuries in the midfoot disrupt key arches of the foot which, if left untreated, can progress to pain, dysfunction, and arthritis. A clinical challenge is that 30-40% of Lisfranc injuries are missed in initial evaluations. The objective of this study was to explore different conditions of limb loading that could influence the biomechanics of the Lisfranc joint in a validated computational model. A computational model was created using SolidWorks software to represent the bones and soft tissues of the lower leg and foot. The model was compared to a cadaveric study of healthy and injured Lisfranc joints. The model was then used to simulate weight-bearing radiographs and evaluate how muscle activity and foot position impacted the diastasis of the Lisfranc joint, a key indicator used to diagnose Lisfranc injuries. The computational model was within one standard deviation of the cadaveric study in all measurements for the healthy and injured foot. When simulating weight-bearing radiographs, the presence of muscle activity or inversion/eversion resulted in less joint separation for the model with ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. While previous research has noted that weight-bearing radiographs provide better conditions to assess Lisfranc injuries than nonweight-bearing, this study suggests that in weight-bearing radiographs both altering the position of the foot, possibly due to pain, and the active contraction of the extrinsic flexor muscles can obfuscate indications of a Lisfranc injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tyler Perez
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - John R Owen
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Jennifer S Wayne
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yongfei F, Chaoyu L, Wenqiang X, Xiulin M, Jian X, Wei W. Clinical outcomes of Tightrope system in the treatment of purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. BMC Surg 2021; 21:395. [PMID: 34743702 PMCID: PMC8573989 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01394-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are mainly caused by low energy damage and often require surgical treatment. There are several operative techniques for rigid fixation to solve this problem clinically. This study evaluated the effect of using the Tightrope system to reconstruct the Lisfranc ligament for elastic fixation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 11 cases with purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated with the Tightrope system from 2016 to 2019, including 8 male and 3 female. X-ray was performed regularly after operation to measure the distance between the first and second metatarsal joint and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate pain relief. American orthopedic foot & ankle society (AOFAS) and Maryland foot score were recorded at the last follow-up. Results The average follow-up time was 20.5 months (range, 17–24). There was statistically significant difference in the distance between the first and second metatarsal joint and VAS score at 3 months, 6 months, and the last follow-up when compared with preoperative values (P < 0.05).Mean of postoperative AOFAS mid-foot scale and Maryland foot score were 92.4 ± 4.3, 94.1 ± 3.5, respectively. The Tightrope system was not removed and the foot obtained better biomechanical stability. No complications occurred during the operation. Conclusion Tightrope system in the treatment of purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries can stabilize the tarsometatarsal joint and achieve satisfactory effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Yongfei
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anhui Spinal Deformity and Clinical Medical Research Center, Fuyang Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, 236000, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Liu Chaoyu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anhui Spinal Deformity and Clinical Medical Research Center, Fuyang Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, 236000, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Wenqiang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anhui Spinal Deformity and Clinical Medical Research Center, Fuyang Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, 236000, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Ma Xiulin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anhui Spinal Deformity and Clinical Medical Research Center, Fuyang Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, 236000, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Jian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anhui Spinal Deformity and Clinical Medical Research Center, Fuyang Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, 236000, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Wang Wei
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anhui Spinal Deformity and Clinical Medical Research Center, Fuyang Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, 236000, Anhui, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Garríguez-Pérez D, Puerto-Vázquez M, Tomé Delgado JL, Galeote E, Marco F. Impact of the Subtle Lisfranc Injury on Foot Structure and Function. Foot Ankle Int 2021; 42:1303-1310. [PMID: 34109830 DOI: 10.1177/10711007211012956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The subtle Lisfranc injury is the disruption of the osteoligamentary complex between the first cuneiform and the second metatarsal, resulting in minor widening of this space that is often difficult to detect with plain radiographs. In this study, we assessed the results after treatment of the different stages of subtle Lisfranc injuries, focusing on their impact on foot arch anatomy and functionality at short- to midterm follow-up. METHODS A retrospective study including patients treated in our center for a subtle Lisfranc injury between 2012 and 2019 was conducted. Demographic, epidemiologic, radiographic, and clinical data were obtained and assessed, focusing on foot arch structure and foot function, which was evaluated with the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and the Foot Function Index (FFI). RESULTS A total of 42 patients with a mean age of 49 ± 17.5 years were included, with an average of 4.3 years' follow-up (range, 1-8). Stage I injuries according to Nunley classification represented 19% and were treated conservatively. Stage II (66.7%) and stage III (14.3%) injuries were treated operatively, via osteosynthesis with screws (74%), K-wires (19%), or plates (7%). Flattening of foot arch after treatment was observed in 42.9% of patients, with significant increases in Costa-Bertani (12 ± 7 degrees), Hibbs (7 ± 6 degrees), and Meary (3 ± 1 degrees) angles. Other complications included complex regional pain syndrome (28.6%) and painful hardware (23.8%). Secondary joint arthrodesis was needed in 16.6% of patients. Chronic pain was present in 71.4% of patients with a mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at final follow-up of 4 of 10 points. Results in AOFAS midfoot score and FFI were 87.4 ± 8.3 and 15 ± 6.4, respectively. CONCLUSION The subtle Lisfranc injury shows dissociation between the initial relatively mild radiographic changes and important future complications. Chronic pain and foot arch flattening were not uncommon. Overall foot function in the short- or midterm was found to be modestly diminished in this somewhat heterogenous cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Garríguez-Pérez
- Foot and Ankle Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Puerto-Vázquez
- Foot and Ankle Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis Tomé Delgado
- Foot and Ankle Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Galeote
- Foot and Ankle Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Marco
- Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chen J, Sagoo N, Panchbhavi VK. The Lisfranc Injury: A Literature Review of Anatomy, Etiology, Evaluation, and Management. Foot Ankle Spec 2021; 14:458-467. [PMID: 32819164 DOI: 10.1177/1938640020950133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite being first described in the 1800s, the Lisfranc injury remains one of the most controversial topics in foot and ankle surgery. From the basic anatomy of the ligament complex to the optimal diagnostic and management methods, new research both sharpens and yet confounds our understanding of this unique injury. This article reviews the literature from established and classic papers to recent studies evaluating newer techniques. We discuss the unique bony and ligamentous anatomy, which confer strength to the Lisfranc complex, the typical mechanisms of injury, the most common classification systems, the clinical presentation, current imaging modalities, and conservative and surgical treatment options. We review studies comparing open reduction and internal fixation with primary arthrodesis of acute injuries, in addition to studies evaluating the various methods for obtaining fixation, including intra-articular screws, dorsal plates, and flexible fixation. It is clear from this review that despite the vast number of studies in the literature, much is still to be learned about the diagnosis and management of this challenging injury.Levels of Evidence: Level V: Expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (JC).,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas (JC, NS, VKP)
| | - Navraj Sagoo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (JC).,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas (JC, NS, VKP)
| | - Vinod Kumar Panchbhavi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (JC).,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas (JC, NS, VKP)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Philpott A, Epstein DJ, Lau SC, Mnatzaganian G, Pang J. Lisfranc Fixation Techniques and Postoperative Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2021; 60:102-108. [PMID: 33039319 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The optimal method of fixation of acute Lisfranc injuries is yet to be established. We aim to systematically review the literature to identify the impact of fixation method on postoperative functional outcomes. A systematic review was undertaken using the PRISMA framework to identify all studies reporting postoperative functional outcomes in patients who underwent open-reduction internal fixation of acute Lisfranc injuries. Studies reporting outcomes of numerous fixation methods were divided into fixation subcohorts. Studies comparing bridge plate with transarticular screw fixation were included for meta-analysis, conducted using a random-effects model. Seventeen studies (20 subcohorts) with 462 patients were included. Mean patient age was 29.6 (rang, 15-81) years. Mean follow-up was 38.7 (range 11 to 287) months. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons midfoot score (AOFAS-MF) was the most frequently reported functional outcome (16/20 subcohorts). Overall weighted mean AOFAS-MF was 76.3 ± 9.4 for all cases, with 74.2 ± 9.4 for transarticular screws and 79.2 ± 8.3 for bridge plates. The mean difference between screw and plate was not statistically significant (mean difference = 5.0, 95% confidence interval, -4.8 - 14.8, p = .3). A single study reported AOFAS-MF mean of 92 using suture button fixation. Meta-analysis of the 2 available comparative studies revealed higher postoperative AOFAS-MF with bridge plate fixation (pooled standardized mean difference, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.87, p = .006). There is scarcity of literature examining the impact of fixation method on postoperative functional outcomes in acute Lisfranc injuries. A small number of studies have reported superior functional outcomes with use of bridge plate fixation. Further evidence is needed to ascertain which injuries are best managed with each fixation method or whether 1 fixation construct is universally superior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Philpott
- Orthopaedic Registrar, Bendigo Base Hospital, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Daniel J Epstein
- Orthopaedic Registrar, Bendigo Base Hospital, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon C Lau
- Orthopaedic Registrar, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - George Mnatzaganian
- Statistician, La Trobe Rural Health School, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jack Pang
- Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Bendigo Base Hospital, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rhodes A, Elliot R, Marsland D. Elective removal of metalwork following Lisfranc injury fixation: Results of a national consensus survey of practice. Foot (Edinb) 2021; 47:101811. [PMID: 33946003 DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
No consensus exists regarding whether metalwork should be routinely removed following fixation of a Lisfranc injury. When metalwork is removed, notable variation in the timing of surgery is reported in current literature. With the support of the British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS) and the Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS) an online 10-question survey was distributed and completed by a total of 205 consultant surgeons in the UK between April-June 2020. Excluding the 20 consultant responses from a regional pilot survey, 185 responses were used to form the main analysis. Over one third (69/183, 37.7%) of surgeons reported they routinely remove metalwork following Lisfranc injury fixation at a median time of 6 months post fixation (interquartile range 4-10). The two most commonly chosen reasons for removal of metalwork were 'to optimise physiological function' and 'to reduce the risk of broken metalwork and risk of making subsequent surgery more difficult' (55/78 responses, 70.5%). Over two thirds of survey respondents (126/184, 68.5%) expressed interest to participate in a randomised controlled trial to compare outcomes of metalwork retention versus removal following Lisfranc injury fixation. Community clinical equipoise exists nationally regarding routine metalwork removal following Lisfranc injury fixation. Considering the paucity of literature, the current survey supports the development of a randomised controlled trial to establish the risks and benefits of metalwork retention versus removal, and would be of value to foot & ankle and trauma surgeons in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Rhodes
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, England, UK.
| | - Robin Elliot
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, England, UK.
| | - Daniel Marsland
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cardile C, Cazzaniga C, Manzini B, Marasco R, Ragni P. Lisfranc injuries in adolescents: A case report and literature review. Foot (Edinb) 2021; 47:101812. [PMID: 33957527 DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Lisfranc injuries result if bones or ligaments that support the midfoot are torn. In children and adolescents these injuries are not only rare, but are also similar to adult Lisfranc injuries, in that they are often mistaken especially if the injury is a result of a straightforward twist and fall. The goal of surgical treatment is to realign the joints. However, few studies related to Lisfranc injuries in pediatric patients exist. A case of 15 years old patient treated using an Arthrex mini tight rope is described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Cardile
- Section of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ospedale Salvini, viale Forlanini 95, 20024 Garbagnate Milanese, Milano, Italy.
| | - Carlo Cazzaniga
- Section of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ospedale Salvini, viale Forlanini 95, 20024 Garbagnate Milanese, Milano, Italy
| | - Beatrice Manzini
- Section of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ospedale Salvini, viale Forlanini 95, 20024 Garbagnate Milanese, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Marasco
- Section of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ospedale Salvini, viale Forlanini 95, 20024 Garbagnate Milanese, Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Ragni
- Section of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ospedale Salvini, viale Forlanini 95, 20024 Garbagnate Milanese, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rhodes D, Leather M, Parker R. Case Study: The Conservative Management of a Complex Mid Foot Injury in an Elite Professional Footballer. Res Sports Med 2021; 30:415-424. [PMID: 33663314 DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2021.1895785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Lisfranc injuries, often accompanied with tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) disruption, are not well documented in football despite becoming increasingly more prevalent within other athletic populations. Currently there is a paucity of evidence documenting prognosis, rehabilitation strategy and outcome. The presented case summarizes the conservative rehabilitation and return to play of a 26-year-old elite professional footballer who presented with a Lisfranc injury alongside a 3rd TMTJ coalition stress response. Injury was sustained when landing awkwardly from a jump causing the midfoot to be forced into a hyper-plantarflexed position. Palpation identified tenderness over the 2nd and 3rd MT, with a positive piano key test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), stork view x-ray and review from a leading foot and ankle specialist confirmed diagnosis, post-contradictory MRI results. Presented is a summary of the assessment process, conservative management of the injury and the resultant rehabilitation process followed, which led to the successful return to play of the athlete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rhodes
- Institute of Coaching and Performance (ICaP), School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK
| | - Mark Leather
- School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK
| | - Russell Parker
- Medical and Science Department, Rangers Football Centre, Glasgow, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kushare I, Wunderlich N, Elabd A, Attia E. Pediatric and adolescent Lisfranc injuries - Presentation, treatment and outcomes. Foot (Edinb) 2021; 46:101737. [PMID: 33853714 DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2020.101737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lisfranc fracture dislocations are rare injuries and even more so in the pediatric population. The main purpose of our study is to present a descriptive analysis of Lisfranc injuries in pediatric patients to add to the current sparse literature on this topic. In addition, our secondary outcome was to analyze any differences in patients treated conservatively versus operatively, and those with isolated Lisfranc injuries versus those with associated foot injuries. METHODS Charts of patients with Lisfranc injury treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2010 to July 2019 were reviewed to analyze their demographics, injury characteristics, management details and rehabilitation protocol. Functional outcome was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VAS) and the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C). RESULTS 30 patients/cases were included with mean age of 13.6 years and mean follow up of 36 weeks. 20% of the cases were missed on initial presentation. 19 cases were managed operatively while 11 were managed conservatively. The average OxAFQ-C and VAS pain scores were 83% and 1.3, respectively at mean follow-up of 36 weeks. The functional outcomes between conservative and operative cases or between those with isolated Lisfranc injuries and those with associated foot injuries were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Lisfranc injury in pediatrics can be easily missed. High index of suspicion, a thorough clinical examination and the use of advanced imaging is warranted. Various modalities like K-wires, screws and suture-buttons can be used for fixation. Early to mid-term functional outcomes are satisfactory provided that adequate reduction is obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indranil Kushare
- Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Nicole Wunderlich
- Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ahmed Elabd
- Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elsayed Attia
- Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Allahabadi S, Amendola A, Lau BC. Optimizing Return to Play for Common and Controversial Foot and Ankle Sports Injuries. JBJS Rev 2020; 8:e20.00067. [PMID: 33405494 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
» Surgical decision-making should consider factors to help optimize return to play for athletes with foot and ankle injuries, including injuries to the syndesmosis, the Achilles tendon, the fifth metatarsal, and the Lisfranc complex. Understanding influential factors on return to play may help orthopaedic surgeons counsel athletes and coaches on expectations for a timeline to return to play and performance metrics. » Outcomes after rigid and flexible fixation for syndesmotic injuries are generally favorable. Some data support an earlier return to sport and higher functional scores with flexible fixation, in addition to lower rates of reoperation and a decreased incidence of malreduction, particularly with deltoid repair, if indicated. » Minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon repair have been shown to have a decreased risk of wound complications. Athletes undergoing Achilles repair should expect to miss a full season of play to recover. » Athletes with fifth metatarsal fractures have better return-to-play outcomes with surgical management and can expect a high return-to-play rate within approximately 3 months of surgery. » Percutaneous treatment of Lisfranc injuries may expedite return to play relative to open procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Allahabadi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Annunziato Amendola
- Duke Sport Science Institute, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian C Lau
- Duke Sport Science Institute, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The management of Lisfranc injuries is challenging considering the broad spectrum of energy involved and highly variable clinical presentation. Despite the advances in surgical techniques, subtle Lisfranc injuries can lead to chronic pain and permanent disability. Surgical treatment is mandatory for all the unstable injuries; however, the best surgical technique remains controversial. The most predictive factor for a successful outcome is the maintenance of anatomic alignment; therefore, the selection of the appropriate surgical technique is of paramount importance. This article reviews the current treatment options and describes the selection of the surgical technique based on the different clinical presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Briceno
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Diagonal Paraguay 362, Postal code: 8330077, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile
| | - Anna-Kathrin Leucht
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Buchnerstrasse 1, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alastair Younger
- Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Distal Extremities, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Orthopedics, St. Paul's Hospital, UBC, Vancouver, Canada; Footbridge Centre for Integrated Orthopaedic Care Inc., Footbridge Clinic, 221-181 Keefer Place, Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 6C1, Canada
| | - Andrea Veljkovic
- Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Distal Extremities, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Orthopedics, St. Paul's Hospital, UBC, Vancouver, Canada; Footbridge Centre for Integrated Orthopaedic Care Inc., Footbridge Clinic, 221-181 Keefer Place, Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 6C1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Injuries to the Lisfranc complex range from purely ligamentous disruptions to fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joint. Treatment options include closed/open reduction with percutaneous pinning, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and primary arthrodesis. We present a ligament reinforcement technique utilizing a flexible fixation device for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Delman
- Department of Orthopedics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Midhat Patel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mark Campbell
- The CORE Institute-Center for Orthopedic Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Christopher Kreulen
- Department of Orthopedics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Eric Giza
- Department of Orthopedics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Robertson GAJ, Ang KK, Maffulli N, Keenan G, Wood AM. Return to sport following Lisfranc injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 25:654-664. [PMID: 30321929 DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information regarding return rates (RR) and mean return times (RT) to sport following Lisfranc injuries remains limited. METHODS A systematic search of nine major databases was performed to identify all studies which recorded RR or RT to sport following lisfranc injuries. RESULTS Seventeen studies were included (n=366). For undisplaced (Stage 1) injuries managed nonoperatively (n=35), RR was 100% and RT was 4.0 (0-15) wks. For stable minimally-displaced (Stage 2) injuries managed nonoperatively (n=16), RR was 100% and RT was 9.1 (4-14) wks. For the operatively-managed injuries, Percutaneous Reduction Internal Fixation (PRIF) (n=42), showed significantly better RR and RT compared to both: Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) (n=139) (RR - 98% vs 78%, p<0.019; RT - 11.6 wks vs 19.6 wks, p<0.001); and Primary Partial Arthrodesis (PPA) (n=85) (RR - 98% vs 85%, p<0.047; RT - 11.6 wks vs 22.0 wks, p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS Stage 1 and stable Stage 2 Lisfranc injuries show good results with nonoperative management. PRIF offers the best RR and RT from the operative methods, though this may not be possible with high-energy injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV. Systematic Review of Level I to Level IV Studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Aidan James Robertson
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom.
| | - Kok Kiong Ang
- Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Keenan
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ren W, Li HB, Lu JK, Hu YC. Undisplaced subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries, conservative or surgical treatment with percutaneous position screws? Chin J Traumatol 2019; 22:196-201. [PMID: 31235287 PMCID: PMC6667927 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Revised: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Undisplaced subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are easy to miss or underestimate, and many cases are treated without surgical fixation. It has not yet widely known whether conservative treatment for undisplaced subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries may lead to a poor outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of conservative versus surgical management (percutaneous position screw) of undisplaced subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injury. METHODS We analysed 61 cases in this retrospective study, including 38 males and 23 females. Forty-one patients were managed conservatively, while 20 patients received surgical treatment involving minimal invasive percutaneous position screw. American orthopaedic foot &ankle society (AOFAS), foot function index (FFI, including FFI disability, FFI pain score and activity limitation scale) scores, Maryland foot score and short form-36 (SF-36) were recorded and compared after a follow-up of 10-16 months (average 12.3). RESULTS Patients in the surgical management group had higher scores in all evaluation methods (p < 0.05). The complications in the conservative management group had higher incidence, mainly including secondary diastasis (34.1% vs. 5.0%), joint stiffness after 3 months (82.9% vs. 0%), and secondary arthrodesis (12.2% vs. 0%). The highest rate of complication in surgical management group was temporary forefoot pain (55.0%). CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that the outcomes of the surgical management with percutaneous position screw fixation are better than the conservative management to treat undisplaced subtle ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. This study can serve as a resource for orthopaedic surgeons in recognizing and managing such injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Ren
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, United Family Hospital, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Hai-Bo Li
- Department of Orthopedic, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Ji-Ke Lu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, United Family Hospital, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Yong-Cheng Hu
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China,Department of Orthopedic, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China,Corresponding author. Tianjin Medical University, No. 22, Qi Xiangtai Road, Heping District, 300070, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jastifer JR, Christianson ER, VanZweden DJ, Gustafson PA. Feasibility of Transosseous Nonarticular Fixation of Lisfranc Injuries. Foot Ankle Int 2019; 40:672-678. [PMID: 30803261 DOI: 10.1177/1071100719830947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal techniques for Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation techniques remain debated. The purpose of the current study was to describe the joints involved in Lisfranc fixation and to determine if nonarticular transosseous internal fixation would be possible. METHODS Twenty cadaver Lisfranc joints were dissected and the articular cartilage was quantified by calibrated digital imaging software. Utilizing CT data, a computational model of the foot was developed and the mean joint surface was mapped and nonarticular screw paths between bones was determined. RESULTS For the medial-middle cuneiform (C1-C2) connection, 27.3% of the lateral face of C1 and 43.7% of the medial face of C2 was articular cartilage. Three variations of articular morphology were observed on C1 and 2 on C2. From the 3D models, it was determined that a joint-sparing, transosseous screw trajectory was possible between C1 and the second metatarsal and between C1 and C2. These screw paths were large enough to accommodate clinically useful screw diameters (>5 mm). The screw trajectories were roughly perpendicular to the long axis of the foot and take a plantar-medial to dorsal-lateral orientation. CONCLUSION The articular surface of the Lisfranc joint was quantified for the first time and may be smaller than some surgeons realize. This study demonstrated the orientation required to minimize articular damage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The clinical significance of the current study was that a nonarticular screw trajectory was possible, and this information may help guide the placement of these screws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Jastifer
- 1 Borgess Orthopedics, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.,2 WMU Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tzatzairis T, Firth G, Parker L. Adolescent Lisfranc injury treated with TightRope TM: A case report and review of literature. World J Orthop 2019; 10:115-122. [PMID: 30788228 PMCID: PMC6379736 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i2.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lisfranc injuries are rare and can be easily missed. This injury is extremely rare in children, with limited published data. Different treatment options have been described; one of the options in adults is the “mini” TightRope™ Syndesmosis Device that provides non-rigid fixation with impressive results. However, there is no reference regarding the use of this device in children.
CASE SUMMARY We describe the case of an 11-year-old girl who sustained a Lisfranc injury of her right foot that was initially missed in the Accident and Emergency department of her local hospital. This case was a ligamentous/periosteal sleeve avulsion type of Lisfranc injury and a percutaneous technique using the “mini” TightRope™ syndesmosis device was used. Clinical and radiological results were excellent at final follow up.
CONCLUSION The “mini” TightRope™ syndesmosis device is a promising method of fixation for children with certain Lisfranc injuries. This method has many advantages, including the non-rigid type of the fixation and no need for subsequent metalwork removal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Themistoklis Tzatzairis
- Royal London Hospital, Paediatric Orthopaedic Department, Barts NHS Trust, London E1 2AA, Whitechapel, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory Firth
- Royal London Hospital, Paediatric Orthopaedic Department, Barts NHS Trust, London E1 2AA, Whitechapel, United Kingdom
| | - Lee Parker
- Royal London Hospital, Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic department, Barts NHS Trust, London E13 8SL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Porter DA, Barnes AF, Rund A, Walrod MT. Injury Pattern in Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries in Competitive Athletes. Foot Ankle Int 2019; 40:185-194. [PMID: 30345792 DOI: 10.1177/1071100718802264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We report data on the largest cohort to date of patients who sustained a ligamentous Lisfranc injury during sport. To date, the prevalence of concurrent intercuneiform ligament injuries in the competitive athlete with subtle Lisfranc instability has not been reported. METHODS: Eighty-two patients (64 males, 18 females) sustained an unstable Lisfranc injury (49 left, 33 right) and met inclusion criteria. Injuries were classified as traditional dislocation (TRAD, first to second TMT ligament tear), medial column dislocation (MCD, second TMT, and medial-middle cuneiform ligament tear), or proximal extension dislocation (PE, first, second, and medial-middle cuneiform ligament tear) and the injury pattern confirmed at surgery. All athletes underwent open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) of each unstable midfoot segment. Fisher exact tests and 2-tailed t tests were used to analyze statistical significance according to injury pattern, sport, gender difference, hindfoot angle alignment, and injured side ( P < .05). RESULTS: Average age of athletes was 21.0 ± 5.3 years old (range 12-40), and return to sports was 7.5 ± 2.1 months. Injury distribution was as follows: TRAD (n = 40), MCD (n = 17), and PE (n = 23). MCD trended toward a longer return to sport (8.4 ± 3.3 months, P = .074). Football was the most common sport at time of injury (n = 48). Wakeboard athletes (n = 5) were older (31.4 ± 3.2, P = .0002), and MCD tears were more prevalent among them ( P = .061). Basketball (n = 13) players were significantly younger (19.1 ± 2.5 years, P = .028) and returned to sports quicker (5.2 ± 0.7, P = .0002). Return to sport data indicated a typical population for athletes with Lisfranc injury in these sports. CONCLUSION: Proximal extension disruption (intercuneiform ligament tear) occurred in 50% of these low-energy Lisfranc athletic injuries. MCD and PE may be more prevalent than previously understood. This is the first study to document the extent, pattern, and prevalence of associated intercuneiform ligament tears in the competitive athlete with a low-energy subtle, unstable Lisfranc injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Angela Rund
- 1 Methodist Sports Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
|
33
|
De Los Santos-Real R, Canillas F, Varas-Navas J, Morales-Muñoz P, Barrio-Sanz P, Medina-Santos M. Lisfranc Joint Ligament Complex Reconstruction: A Promising Solution for Missed, Delayed, or Chronic Lisfranc Injury Without Arthritis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2018; 56:1350-1356. [PMID: 28843550 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The current classifications of "Lisfranc injury" can be purely ligamentous (low-grade midfoot sprains) or involve the osseous and articular structures (high-grade Lisfranc fracture displacements). The first type is often difficult to detect. If these patients are not properly treated, long-term disability can result. The rate of missed or delayed diagnoses has ranged from 13% to 24%, primarily owing to the subtlety of the radiographic findings. This is relatively more common in cases of subtle ligamentous injury (19%). The aim of the present report was to provide a new technique for missed or delayed Lisfranc injury without degenerative local signs. The Lisfranc ligament complex reconstruction is performed with a gracilis tendon graft and is protected by temporary screw fixation. We performed this technique in 3 patients. All 3 patients obtained good results, have been able to resume their previous activities, and have stated they would undergo this type of procedure again. The minimum follow-up length was 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raúl De Los Santos-Real
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Central Cruz Roja, Madrid, Spain; Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Fernando Canillas
- Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Madrid, Spain; Head Physician and Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Central Cruz Roja, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Varas-Navas
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofıa, Madrid, Spain; Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Morales-Muñoz
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofıa, Madrid, Spain; Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Barrio-Sanz
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofıa, Madrid, Spain; Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mónica Medina-Santos
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Central Cruz Roja, Madrid, Spain; Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fukutake K, Hattori H, Sekiguchi M, Inoue Y, Kamakura D, Tsuji K, Kojimahara Y, Takahashi H, Tsuchiya K. Percutaneous fixation of avulsion fracture at the plantar lateral base of the first metatarsal using ZipTight Fixation System: A case report. Foot Ankle Surg 2018; 24:e13-e17. [PMID: 29933964 DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Isolated avulsion fracture of the peroneus longus tendon insertion at the base of the first metatarsal without injury of the tarsometatarsal joint is very rare. Similar to most avulsion fractures, this type of injury is caused by strong tension exerted by the peroneus longus tendon. The mechanism leading to this lesion and treatment options are not clearly defined. Several surgical techniques have been advocated for this fracture, including excision of an avulsion fragment and open reduction for internal fixation through the medial aspect of the foot or minimal plantar incision. We have described a method of percutaneous fixing of the avulsion fracture at the plantar lateral base of the first metatarsal using the ZipTight Fixation System (Zimmer Biomet Warsaw, Indiana, USA), which offers the advantage of allowing a rigid fixation and minimal invasive surgical technique for a small fragment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsunori Fukutake
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Hattori
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Tokyo Kamata Medical Center 2-19-2, Minamikamata, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 144-0035, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sekiguchi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Inoue
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kamakura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan
| | - Kentaro Tsuji
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan
| | - Yousuke Kojimahara
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Tokyo Kamata Medical Center 2-19-2, Minamikamata, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 144-0035, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Tsuchiya
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Correction of craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation in cats and small breed dogs using a modified Knowles technique with the braided polyblend TightRope™ systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 25:54-60. [DOI: 10.3415/vcot-11-02-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2011] [Accepted: 08/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
SummaryObjectives: To report the surgical technique and short-term radiographic and functional outcome data for a series of client owned, small breed dogs and cats treated for traumatic craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation using open reduction and internal fixation with the Arthrex Mini TightRope (mTR) and TightRope (TR) systems.Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from the clinical case records, including the initial clinical and radiographic findings, surgical technique, and postoperative short-term clinical and radiographic data. Functional data collected after the six weeks reassessment were obtained via owner questionnaire.Results: Four cats (mTR = 4) and five small breed dogs (mean weight 15 kg; TR = 4, mTR = 1) were included. Median time to postoperative weight bearing was one day. Median lameness score at six weeks postoperatively was 0 out of 5. Coxofemoral joint congruity was radiographically confirmed at the six weeks postoperative visit. Telephone follow-up (at a median of 16 weeks) revealed all animals had returned to their previous level of activity. Complications were minor, and limited to postoperative swelling (n = 1).Clinical significance: Clinical use of the Arthrex Mini TightRope™ and TightRope™ systems can be recommended for traumatic craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation in this novel application as short-term results are at least comparable to existing surgical techniques. Long-term follow-up studies are needed.
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Orthopedic surgery is not short of situations where there is controversy regarding optimum management. Treating ankle syndesmosis injuries is an example where practice varies widely and there are many questions that remain unsatisfactorily answered. When addressing the type of syndesmosis stabilization that is required it is essential to ascertain the extent of instability. Only then can a logical approach to restoring the ankle mortise be achieved. Fixation of fibula shaft fractures and posterior malleolus fractures can restore sufficient stability to render syndesmosis stabilization unnecessary. The indications and techniques for stabilizing the distal tibiofibular joint are reviewed with clinical examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Solan
- London Foot and Ankle Centre, Hospital of St John and St Elizabeth, 60 Grove End Road, London NW8 9NH, UK; Surrey Foot and Ankle Clinic, Mount Alvernia Hospital, Harvey Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 3LX, UK.
| | - Mark S Davies
- London Foot and Ankle Centre, Hospital of St John and St Elizabeth, 60 Grove End Road, London NW8 9NH, UK
| | - Anthony Sakellariou
- Surrey Foot and Ankle Clinic, Mount Alvernia Hospital, Harvey Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 3LX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Ligament reconstruction with single bone tunnel technique for chronic symptomatic subtle injury of the Lisfranc joint in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135:1063-70. [PMID: 26018890 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2250-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Only few procedures for Lisfranc ligaments reconstruction to treat subtle injury of the Lisfranc joint have been reported. We have developed a novel technique for Lisfranc ligaments reconstruction, which was applied to treat chronic symptomatic subtle injuries that had failed to respond to initial treatment or were misdiagnosed. This article describes the technique and its operative outcome in a small case series. METHODS Between April 2011 and October 2013, 5 (4 male and 1 female) athletes with a mean age of 19.4 (range 17-21) years were diagnosed with chronic subtle injury of the Lisfranc joint and underwent our novel reconstructive operation. In this technique, only a bone tunnel between the medial cuneiform and the second metatarsal bone is needed for near-anatomical reconstruction of the dorsal and interosseous ligaments. All patients were evaluated before and at 1 year after surgery using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale for the ankle-midfoot. In addition, the interval between surgery and return to athletic activity, defined as return to near pre-injury performance level, was investigated. RESULTS Mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 18.8 (range 12-26) months. Mean AOFAS score improved significantly from 74.6 ± 2.5 (range 71-77) preoperatively to 96.0 ± 5.5 (range 90-100) at 1 year after the operation (p < 0.01). All patients were able to return to their previous athletic activities and the interval between surgery and return to athletic activity was 16.8 ± 1.1 (range 15-18) weeks. There was no complication related to the operation. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that our technique of Lisfranc ligaments reconstruction using autologous graft is effective for athletes with chronic subtle injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, retrospective case series.
Collapse
|
39
|
Crates JM, Barber FA, Sanders EJ. Subtle lisfranc subluxation: results of operative and nonoperative treatment. J Foot Ankle Surg 2015; 54:350-5. [PMID: 25746769 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Subtle Lisfranc instability is typically a low-energy, twisting, axial-loading injury. The present study evaluated the operative treatment of subtle Lisfranc injuries after nonoperative failure. The data from consecutive patients with subtle Lisfranc instabilities were reviewed. Those in whom initial nonoperative treatment had failed underwent surgery. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score was obtained initially, after nonoperative treatment, and, for those in whom nonoperative treatment had failed, after operative treatment. Of 36 patients enrolled, 16 (44.44%) were successfully treated nonoperatively, and 20 (55.56%) required surgery after nonoperative treatment had failed. Of those treated operatively, 9 (45%) were stabilized with dual screws and 11 (55%) with dual suture buttons. The mean follow-up period was 36 ± 12.2 months. The AOFAS scores significantly improved from the pre- to final post-treatment values. The overall mean pretreatment AOFAS score (62.8 ± 8.84) was significantly lower statistically than the mean overall post-treatment AOFAS score (91.3 ± 8.34; p < .0001). The mean AOFAS score before nonoperative treatment (61.9 ± 9.5) improved to a mean AOFAS score of 75.3 ± 15.8 after nonoperative treatment (p = .0029). The mean preoperative AOFAS score (63.5 ± 8.46) improved to a postoperative AOFAS score of 92.3 ± 8.43 (p < .0001). The mean AOFAS score before nonoperative treatment (61.9 ± 9.5) was not significantly different statistically from the mean preoperative AOFAS score (63.5 ± 8.46; p = .62). The mean AOFAS score after nonoperative treatment (75.3 ± 15.8) was lower than the mean postoperative AOFAS score (92.3 ± 8.43; p < .0001). Of the 9 feet stabilized with dual screws, 7 (77.78%) required screw removal during the observation period. Subtle Lisfranc injuries failing nonoperative treatment were successfully stabilized using either a dual screw or suture button technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Crates
- Plano Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Spine Center, Plano, TX
| | - F Alan Barber
- Plano Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Spine Center, Plano, TX.
| | - Eric J Sanders
- Plano Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Spine Center, Plano, TX
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Haytmanek CT, Clanton TO. Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries in the Athlete. OPER TECHN SPORT MED 2014. [DOI: 10.1053/j.otsm.2014.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
41
|
Abstract
Essex-Lopresti injury consists of a fracture or dislocation of the radial head, rupture of the interosseous membrane (IOM), which is the main pathology, and a dislocated distal radio-ulnar joint. There are several reports in the literature, including cadaveric studies, which suggest an operative solution for this complicated injury. The torn IOM is not treated during the traditional operative repair. In the following paper, we suggest a treatment for the IOM by unloading it with the TightRope device. This device temporarily takes the tension off the torn IOM and assists in reduction and maintenance of the longitudinal ratios between the radius and the ulna, while allowing its healing. Recently, we have treated one patient with this system. The application of the TightRope technique in this acute injury and the follow-up are described in this case report.
Collapse
|
42
|
Marsland D, Belkoff SM, Solan MC. Biomechanical analysis of endobutton versus screw fixation after Lisfranc ligament complex sectioning. Foot Ankle Surg 2013; 19:267-72. [PMID: 24095236 DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Revised: 06/21/2013] [Accepted: 06/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our goal was to compare diastasis after endobutton and screw fixation after Lisfranc ligament complex sectioning. METHODS Twenty-four (12 pairs) fresh-frozen cadaveric feet were assigned to endobutton or screw fixation and loaded to 343N. Displacement (first-second metatarsal bases) was measured in intact feet and after ligament sectioning (Lisfranc, medial-intermediate cuneiform ligaments), fixation, and 10,000 cycles. RESULTS The mean change in diastasis for endobutton and screw fixation under initial loading was 1.0mm (95% CI, 0.2-1.9mm) and 0.0mm (95% CI, -0.4 to 0.4mm), respectively (p=0.017). After cyclic loading, diastasis decreased (mean, -0.7mm, 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.1mm) in the endobutton group but was unchanged in the screw group (p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS Diastasis after endobutton fixation was significantly greater than after screw fixation under initial loading but did not increase further after cyclic loading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Marsland
- International Center for Orthopaedic Advancement, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Eleftheriou KI, Rosenfeld PF. Lisfranc injury in the athlete: evidence supporting management from sprain to fracture dislocation. Foot Ankle Clin 2013; 18:219-36. [PMID: 23707175 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2013.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Although Lisfranc injuries are uncommon, prompt and accurate diagnosis of such injuries in athletes is essential in preventing career-ending injury. Undisplaced injuries have an excellent result with nonoperative treatment. The presence of any displacement warrants open reduction and anatomic fixation; although current evidence mostly supports screw fixation, plate fixation may avoid joint intrusion. It is imperative to warn athletes with significantly displaced injuries that there is a risk of a poor outcome, although some recent evidence suggests that return to elite competitive sports is still likely after surgical intervention. Severe injuries may have better outcomes with limited arthrodesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriacos I Eleftheriou
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Eleftheriou KI, Rosenfeld PF, Calder JDF. Lisfranc injuries: an update. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21:1434-46. [PMID: 23563815 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2491-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2013] [Accepted: 03/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Lisfranc injuries are a spectrum of injuries to the tarsometatarsal joint complex of the midfoot. These range from subtle ligamentous sprains, often seen in athletes, to fracture dislocations seen in high-energy injuries. Accurate and early diagnosis is important to optimise treatment and minimise long-term disability, but unfortunately, this is a frequently missed injury. Undisplaced injuries have excellent outcomes with non-operative treatment. Displaced injuries have worse outcomes and require anatomical reduction and internal fixation for the best outcome. Although evidence to date supports the use of screw fixation, plate fixation may avoid further articular joint damage and may have benefits. Recent evidence supports the use of limited arthrodesis in more complex injuries.
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Lievers WB, Frimenko RE, Crandall JR, Kent RW, Park JS. Age, sex, causal and injury patterns in tarsometatarsal dislocations: a literature review of over 2000 cases. Foot (Edinb) 2012; 22:117-24. [PMID: 22560256 DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2012.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 03/09/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The causes and mechanisms of tarsometatarsal (TMT) dislocations are poorly characterized. Unfortunately, the rarity of these injuries makes it difficult and costly to gather the epidemiological data needed to better understand the populations at risk and the circumstances under which injury is most likely to occur. METHODOLOGY To address this issue, literature reports of TMT dislocations were identified and analyzed to generate statistical descriptions of the common causes of injury, the age and sex of those injured, and the pattern of injury. Over 2000 injuries were identified from 187 articles. RESULTS The analysis reveals that over 40% of injuries were related to traffic accidents. Based on the Hardcastle classification system, more than 60% of TMT dislocation were partial (type B) injuries. Over 55% of the injured were between 15 and 35 years of age, and males were injured more than twice as frequently. Conversely, the victims of falls tended to be older and represented a larger proportion of females. The age and sex of those injured by TMT dislocations vary by cause. CONCLUSION An improved understanding of the epidemiologic patterns will benefit research into the mitigation and prevention of these injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Brent Lievers
- Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22901, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Reinhardt KR, Oh LS, Schottel P, Roberts MM, Levine D. Treatment of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations with primary partial arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2012; 33:50-6. [PMID: 22381236 DOI: 10.3113/fai.2012.0050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal method of treatment for Lisfranc fracture-dislocations remains controversial, and the role of primary partial arthrodesis for combined osseous-ligamentous Lisfranc injuries is unclear. This study reviewed the outcomes of Lisfranc injuries treated by primary partial arthrodesis. METHODS Patients who underwent primary partial arthrodesis for a primarily ligamentous or combined osseous and ligamentous Lisfranc fracture-dislocation were reviewed retrospectively and assessed at followup according to radiographic, clinical and standardized patient-based outcomes. Twenty-five patients (12 ligamentous, 13 combined), median age of 46 (range, 20 to 73) years, were followed for an average of 42 (range, 24 to 96) months. RESULTS The average American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 81 points (scale 0 to 100), with patients in general losing points for mild pain, limitations of recreational activities, and fashionable footwear requirements. There was no statistical difference between ligamentous and combined injuries with regard to the physical or mental component scores on the SF-36. At latest followup, patients reported an average return to 85% of their preinjury activity level (range, 50% to 100%). Twenty-one patients (84%) expressed satisfaction with their outcome and at latest followup, the mean visual analog pain scale (VAS) score was 1.8 out of 10 (range, 0 to 8). Three patients showed radiographic signs of post-traumatic arthritis of adjacent joints. CONCLUSION Treatment of both primarily ligamentous and combined osseous and ligamentous lisfranc injuries with primary partial arthrodesis produced good clinical and patient-based outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith R Reinhardt
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|