1
|
Kamoda H, Tsukanishi T, Kinoshita H, Hagiwara Y, Endo Y, Takahashi H, Takeda K, Hirashima T, Ishii T, Yonemoto T. Preoperative prediction of early mortality after surgery for spinal metastases. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2025; 55:36-39. [PMID: 39252560 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to provide a convenient preoperative prediction of the risk of early postoperative mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastasis at our hospital between 2009 and 2021. Preoperative blood test data of all patients were collected, and the survival time was calculated by dividing the blood data. A multivariate analysis was conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS The study population included 83 patients (average: 64.5 years), 22 of whom died within 3 months. The most common lesion was the thoracic spine, and incomplete paralysis was observed in 57 patients. The surgical methods included posterior implant fixation (n = 17), posterior decompression (n = 31), and posterior decompression with fixation (n = 35). In the univariate analysis, the presence of abnormal values was significantly associated with postoperative survival in six preoperative blood collection items (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, white blood cell, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and lactate dehydrogenase). In a multivariate analysis, four test items (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell, and lactate dehydrogenase) were identified as independent prognostic factors.Comparing cases with ≥3 abnormal values among the above four items (high-risk group; n = 23) and those with ≤2 (low-risk group; n = 60), there was a significant difference in survival time. In addition, it was possible to predict cases of early death within 3 months after surgery with 73% sensitivity and 89% specificity. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that four preoperative blood test abnormalities (hemoglobin, C-reactive protein white blood cell, and lactate dehydrogenase) indicated the possibility of early death within 3 months after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroto Kamoda
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toshinori Tsukanishi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical university Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan
| | | | - Yoko Hagiwara
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuji Endo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroki Takahashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kosuke Takeda
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Hirashima
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ishii
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Yonemoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gojsevic M, Shariati S, Chan AW, Bonomo P, Zhang E, Kennedy SKF, Rajeswaran T, Rades D, Vassiliou V, Soliman H, Lee SF, Wong HCY, Rembielak A, Oldenburger E, Akkila S, Azevedo L, Chow E. Quality of life in patients with malignant spinal cord compression: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:736. [PMID: 38055061 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an oncological emergency that may result in a devastating combination of malignancy and disability. Existing quality of life (QoL) questionnaires commonly used in MSCC literature (EORTC QLQ-C30, BM-22, Brief Pain Inventory, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes) may not capture all the commonly reported symptoms and lack specificity to MSCC. The primary objective of this systematic review is to determine unmet patient needs and underreported QoL issues and compile a comprehensive list of QoL issues. The secondary objective of this review is to compile all existing QoL tools and questionnaires and determine whether any QoL issues are not addressed in the existing tools currently used in the literature. METHODS A literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1946 and February 6, 2023, to compile all QoL issues and existing questionnaires used to assess QoL in patients with MSCC. All study designs were included given that they discussed QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC. RESULTS The results of this systematic review identified the most frequently discussed QoL issues in the literature studying MSCC. This included direct symptoms of MSCC such as back pain, paralysis, limb weakness/numbness, and urinary/bowel incontinence. Indirect symptoms coming from radiotherapy treatment such as dysphagia, painful swallowing, mouth pain, dry mouth, diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting were also noted. Other symptoms resulting from corticosteroid treatment included difficulty sleeping, blurring of vision, weight gain, and mood disturbance. Patients also experienced psychosocial issues such as anxiety, depression, emotional distress, low self-esteem, concerns about dependence on others, concerns about getting home, and fear about their prognosis and future. CONCLUSION This review highlights the QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC and QoL tools capturing these issues. Relevance of QoL issues identified in this systematic review must be prospectively validated by patients and healthcare professionals with experience in treating MSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Gojsevic
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Saba Shariati
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adrian Wai Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Elwyn Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samantha K F Kennedy
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thenugaa Rajeswaran
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Vassilios Vassiliou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Hany Soliman
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shing-Fung Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Henry C Y Wong
- Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Agata Rembielak
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eva Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Shereen Akkila
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Edward Chow
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suzuki A, Terai H, Takahashi S, Kato M, Toyoda H, Tamai K, Hori Y, Okamura Y, Nakamura H. Risk Factors for Poor Outcome after Palliative Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103442. [PMID: 37240548 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Palliative surgery is performed to improve the quality of life of patients with spinal metastases. However, it is sometimes difficult to achieve the expected results because the patient's condition, and risk factors related to poor outcomes have not been well elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes and investigate the risk factors for poor outcomes after palliative surgery for spinal metastasis. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 117 consecutive patients who underwent palliative surgery for spinal metastases. Neurological and ambulatory statuses were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. Poor outcomes were defined as no improvement or deterioration in functional status or early mortality, and the related risk factors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results showed neurological improvement in 48% and ambulatory improvement in 70% of the patients with preoperative impairment, whereas 18% of the patients showed poor outcomes. In the multivariate analysis, low hemoglobin levels and low revised Tokuhashi scores were identified as risk factors for poor outcomes. The present results suggest that anemia and low revised Tokuhashi scores are related not only to life expectancy but also to functional recovery after surgery. Treatment options should be carefully selected for the patients with these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinobu Suzuki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Hidetomi Terai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Shinji Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Minori Kato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Toyoda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Koji Tamai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yusuke Hori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yuki Okamura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nakamura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chanplakorn P, Budsayavilaimas C, Jaipanya P, Kraiwattanapong C, Keorochana G, Leelapattana P, Lertudomphonwanit T. Validation of Traditional Prognosis Scoring Systems and Skeletal Oncology Research Group Nomogram for Predicting Survival of Spinal Metastasis Patients Undergoing Surgery. Clin Orthop Surg 2022; 14:548-556. [PMID: 36518924 PMCID: PMC9715924 DOI: 10.4055/cios22014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many scoring systems that predict overall patient survival are based on clinical parameters and primary tumor type. To date, no consensus exists regarding which scoring system has the greatest predictive survival accuracy, especially when applied to specific primary tumors. Additionally, such scores usually fail to include modern treatment modalities, which influence patient survival. This study aimed to evaluate both the overall predictive accuracy of such scoring systems and the predictive accuracy based on the primary tumor. METHODS A retrospective review on spinal metastasis patients who were aged more than 18 years and underwent surgical treatment was conducted between October 2008 and August 2018. Patients were scored based on data before the time of surgery. A survival probability was calculated for each patient using the given scoring systems. The predictive ability of each scoring system was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis at postoperative time points; area under the curve was then calculated to quantify predictive accuracy. RESULTS A total of 186 patients were included in this analysis: 101 (54.3%) were men and the mean age was 57.1 years. Primary tumors were lung in 37 (20%), breast in 26 (14%), prostate in 20 (10.8%), hematologic malignancy in 18 (9.7%), thyroid in 10 (5.4%), gastrointestinal tumor in 25 (13.4%), and others in 40 (21.5%). The primary tumor was unidentified in 10 patients (5.3%). The overall survival was 201 days. For survival prediction, the Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) nomogram showed the highest performance when compared to other prognosis scores in all tumor metastasis but a lower performance to predict survival with lung cancer. The revised Katagiri score demonstrated acceptable performance to predict death for breast cancer metastasis. The Tomita and revised Tokuhashi scores revealed acceptable performance in lung cancer metastasis. The New England Spinal Metastasis Score showed acceptable performance for predicting death in prostate cancer metastasis. SORG nomogram demonstrated acceptable performance for predicting death in hematologic malignancy metastasis at all time points. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrated inconsistent predictive performance among the prediction models for the specific primary tumor types. The SORG nomogram revealed the highest predictive performance when compared to previous survival prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pongsthorn Chanplakorn
- Department of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chanthong Budsayavilaimas
- Department of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Orthopedic Unit, Banphaeo General Hospital, Samutsakhon, Thailand
| | - Pilan Jaipanya
- Department of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Orthopedic Unit, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand
| | - Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong
- Department of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Gun Keorochana
- Department of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pittavat Leelapattana
- Department of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit
- Department of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Functional outcomes and survival after surgical stabilization for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer with spinal metastasis of the thoracic and lumbar spines: a retrospective comparison between epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy groups. Spinal Cord 2019; 58:194-202. [PMID: 31501501 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0352-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES To compare the surgical results between targeted therapy and post-operative chemotherapy for patients with spinal metastasis of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SETTING Single-center study at an academic orthopedic department in Taiwan. METHODS Sixty-five patients were treated surgically for spinal metastasis of inoperable NSCLC with long posterior instrumentation with or without posterior decompression according to the patient's neurologic status. Post-operative radiotherapy of the spinal lesion and targeted therapy or chemotherapy were done following surgery after the surgical wound healed. Post-operative clinical outcomes and survival were evaluated and compared between these two groups. The overall survival represented survival from the date of diagnosis to death. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were grouped as the targeted therapy group and 30 patients as the chemotherapy group. The overall median survival times were 12.0 and 10.0 months in the targeted therapy and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Sixty-two patients were able to walk with or without an aid postoperatively. There was no significant difference observed between these two groups in terms of pain relief, neurologic improvement, ambulatory improvement, and survival. CONCLUSIONS Surgical stabilization with or without laminectomy improved functional outcomes in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer, and post-operative functional outcomes were similar between chemotherapy and targeted therapy groups. A longer survival was observed with targeted therapy for the patients whose NSCLC was diagnosed before spinal metastasis, however, the longer survival was not statistically significant.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wei D, Nistal DA, Sobotka S, Martini M, Hawks C, Jenkins AL. New Predictive Index for Survival in Symptomatic Spinal Metastases. World Neurosurg 2018; 123:e133-e140. [PMID: 30468921 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with spinal metastases have broad variability in morbidity, mortality, and survival. Existing prognostic scoring systems have limited predictive value. Our aim is, given recent advances in surgical and medical care for patients with cancer and spinal metastases, to develop a new survival index with superior prognostic value. METHODS We completed a retrospective analysis on 77 patients who received surgery for metastatic tumors to the spine, of patient factors like pathologic subtype, age, neurologic examination, type of surgical procedure, Hauser Ambulation Index, and a novel scoring system for degree of tumor burden in several organ systems, among others. A survival index will be derived from the patient factors that, when measured preintervention, best predicted survival post intervention. RESULTS Although primary organ or pathologic type was not predictive of survival for patients with metastatic disease in this population, the degree of lung tumor burden (LTB) and preoperative Hauser Ambulation Index were predictive of survival. After a multivariable analysis of >20 different patient factors, the Jenkins Survival Index (JSI, a 0-21 scale) was constructed using a machine-learning system as the sum of the HAI (0-9 scale) and LTB score (0-3 scale) multiplied by 4 (JSI = HAI + 4 · LTB, Rho = -0.588, P < 0.0001). The JSI had a positive predictive value of 92% compared with 54.1% and 56.9% for Tokuhashi and Tomita scales, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The JSI predicts in a meaningful way survival outcomes for patients symptomatic from spinal metastases, which will be of value to oncologists and other clinicians treating patients with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dominic A Nistal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stanislaw Sobotka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Michael Martini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Arthur L Jenkins
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cawley DT, Butler JS, Benton A, Altaf F, Rezajooi K, Kyriakou C, Selvadurai S, Molloy S. Managing the cervical spine in multiple myeloma patients. Hematol Oncol 2018; 37:129-135. [PMID: 30334279 DOI: 10.1002/hon.2564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Discuss the relevant literature on surgical and nonsurgical treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) and their complementary effects on overall treatment. Existing surgical algorithms designed for neoplasia of the spine may not suit the management of spinal myeloma. Less than a fifth of metastatic, including myelomatous lesions, occur in the cervical spine but have a poorer prognosis and surgery in this area carries a higher morbidity. With the advances of chemotherapy, early access to radiotherapy, early orthosis management, and high definition imaging, including CT and MRI, surgical indications in MM have changed. Medical decompression (or oncolysis), including in the presence of neurological deficit and orthotic stabilization, are proving viable nonsurgical options to manage MM. A key to decision making is the assessment and monitoring of biomechanical spinal stability as part of a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek T Cawley
- Myeloma Spine Service, Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| | - Joseph S Butler
- Myeloma Spine Service, Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| | - Adam Benton
- Myeloma Spine Service, Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| | - Farhaan Altaf
- Myeloma Spine Service, Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| | - Kia Rezajooi
- Myeloma Spine Service, Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| | - Charalampia Kyriakou
- Department of Haematology, University College London & London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Susanne Selvadurai
- Myeloma Spine Service, Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| | - Sean Molloy
- Myeloma Spine Service, Department of Spinal Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prognostic Factors of Ambulatory Status for Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 116:e278-e290. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
9
|
Functional status of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:3225-3231. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4182-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
10
|
Tokuhashi Y, Uei H, Oshima M. Classification and scoring systems for metastatic spine tumors: a literature review. Spine Surg Relat Res 2017; 1:44-55. [PMID: 31440612 PMCID: PMC6698555 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Accurate evaluation of metastasis and life prognosis is essential for selecting a suitable therapeutic strategy for metastatic spine tumors owing to limitations in treatment options. For this purpose, various classification, evaluation, and scoring systems have been developed. Methods Classification, evaluation, and scoring systems for metastatic spine tumors reported to date were identified by performing a literature search on PubMed. We reviewed the most cited classifications and scorings before 2009, and all classifications and scorings reported after 2010 from the search results. Results Six classifications and 23 scorings were reviewed. The classification/evaluation methods are divided into 1) anatomical classification/evaluation methods, 2) evaluation methods for neurological symptoms/instability, and 3) scoring systems for predicting life expectancy. The first 2 were useful for the planning and evaluation of surgical indications. Scoring systems for life prognosis also permitted rough prediction of the outcomes and were useful for the selection of a suitable treatment. However, variation of the patient background, diversity of adopted prognostic factors, and the absence of scoring systems that could predict the outcome with an accuracy of 90% or higher introduced some limitations. Conclusion The identified classification, evaluation, and scoring systems have been generally useful for treatment strategies. However, we emphasize the necessity of multidisciplinary development and revision of classification and evaluation methods to adapt to the prolongation of survival associated with increased diversity and improvement of treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuaki Tokuhashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Uei
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masashi Oshima
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lei M, Liu S, Yang S, Liu Y, Wang C, Gao H. New imaging characteristics for predicting postoperative neurologic status in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. A retrospective analysis of 81 cases. Spine J 2017; 17:814-820. [PMID: 28034746 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Several clinical features have been proposed for the prediction of postoperative functional outcome in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). However, few articles address the relationship between preoperative imaging characteristics and the postoperative neurologic status. PURPOSE This study aims to analyze the postoperative functional outcome and to identify new imaging parameters for predicting postoperative neurologic status in patients with MESCC. STUDY DESIGN This study is a retrospective consecutive case series of patients with MESCC who were treated surgically. PATIENT SAMPLE We assessed 81 consecutive patients who were treated with decompressive surgery for MESCC between 2013 and 2015. OUTCOME MEASURES Eight imaging characteristics were analyzed for postoperative motor status by logistic regression models. Neurologic function was assessed using the Frankel grade preoperatively and postoperatively. METHODS The following imaging characteristics were assessed for postoperative motor status: location of lesions in the spine, lamina involvement, retropulsion of the posterior wall, number of vertebrae involved, pedicle involvement, fracture of any involved vertebrae, T2 signal of the spinal cord at the compression site, and circumferential angle of spinal cord compression (CASCC). RESULTS The postoperative neurologic outcome was better than the preoperative neurologic status (p<.01). In the entire group, 40.7% of the patients were non-ambulatory before the surgical procedure, whereas 77.8% of the patients could walk after surgery (p=.01). In the multivariate analysis, the location of the lesions (odds ratio [OR]: 3.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-12.77, p=.02) and CASCC (OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.44-3.71, p<.01) were significantly associated with postoperative neurologic outcome. A CASCC of more than 180° was associated with an increased OR that approached significance, and the larger the CASCC, the higher the risk of poor postoperative neurologic status. CONCLUSIONS The postoperative neurologic status was dependent on the location of spine lesions and the CASCC. Patients with upper thoracic or cervicothoracic junction spine metastases or CASCC over 180° were at higher risk of relatively poor postoperative neurologic outcome. Timely, adequate surgical decompression is urgently warranted in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingxing Lei
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Shubin Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Shaoxing Yang
- Department of Pulmonary Neoplasms Internal Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Yaosheng Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing 100071, China.
| | - Cheng Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Hongjun Gao
- Department of Pulmonary Neoplasms Internal Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Sciences, No. 8, Fengtaidongda Rd, Beijing 100071, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Predicting Neurologic Recovery after Surgery in Patients with Deficits Secondary to MESCC: Systematic Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41 Suppl 20:S224-S230. [PMID: 27488300 PMCID: PMC5581189 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic literature review and expert survey OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with neurologic improvement in patients with neurologic deficits secondary to metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Clear understanding of these factors will guide surgical decision-making by helping to elucidate which patients are more likely to benefit from surgery and how surgeons can increase the probability of neurologic and functional restoration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Surgical spinal cord decompression has been shown to improve neurologic function in patients with symptomatic MESCC. However, prognostication of neurologic improvement after surgery remains challenging, owing to sparse data and complexity of these patients. METHODS PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant publications. PRISMA Statement guided publication selection and data reporting. GRADE guidelines were used for evidence quality evaluation and recommendation formulation. RESULTS Low-quality evidence supports the use of the duration and severity of neurologic deficit as predictors of neurological recovery in patients with MESCC. Low-quality evidence supports the use of thoracic level of compression and previous irradiation as adverse predictors of neurological recovery. Nearly all of the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor members who responded to the survey agreed that ambulation with assistance represented a successful surgical result and that duration of ambulation loss and the severity of weakness should be considered when trying to predict whether surgery would result in restoration of ambulation. CONCLUSIONS Review of literature and expert opinion support the importance of duration of ambulation loss and the severity of neurologic deficit (muscle strength, bladder function) in prediction of neurologic recovery among patients with symptomatic MESCC. Efforts to reduce the duration of ambulation loss and to prevent progression of neurologic deficits should be made to improve the probability of neurologic recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.
Collapse
|
13
|
Accuracy of Tokuhashi score system in predicting survival of lung cancer patients with vertebral metastasis. J Neurooncol 2015; 125:427-33. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1934-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Accepted: 09/07/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
14
|
Ha KY, Kim YH, Ahn JH, Park HY. Factors Affecting Survival in Patients Undergoing Palliative Spine Surgery for Metastatic Lung and Hepatocellular Cancer: Dose the Type of Surgery Influence the Surgical Results for Metastatic Spine Disease? Clin Orthop Surg 2015; 7:344-50. [PMID: 26330957 PMCID: PMC4553283 DOI: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2015] [Accepted: 06/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical treatment for metastatic spine disease has been becoming more prominent with the help of technological advances and a few favorable reports on the surgery. In cases of this peculiar condition, it is necessary to establish the role of surgery and analyze the factors affecting survival. Methods From January 2011 to April 2015, 119 patients were surgically treated for metastatic spine lesions. To reduce the bias along the heterogeneous cancers, the primary cancer was confined to either the lung (n = 25) or the liver (n = 18). Forty-three patients (male, 32; female, 11; mean age, 57.5 years) who had undergone palliative surgery were enrolled in this study. Posterior decompression and fusion was performed in 30 patients (P group), and anteroposterior (AP) reconstruction was performed in 13 patients (AP group) for palliative surgery. Pre- and postoperative (3 months) pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), performance status (Karnofsky performance score), neurologic status (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] grade), and spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) were compared. The survival period and related hazard factors were also assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results Most patients experienced improvements in pain and performance status (12.3% ± 17.2%) at 3 months postoperatively. In terms of neurologic recovery, 9 patients (20.9%) graded ASIA D experienced neurological improvement to ASIA E while the remainder was status quo. In an analysis according to operation type, there was no significant difference in patient demographics. At 12 months postoperatively, cumulative survival rates were 31.5% and 38.7% for the P group and the AP group, respectively (p > 0.05). Survival was not affected by the pre- and postoperative pain scale, Tokuhashi score, neurologic status, SINS, or operation type. Preoperative Karnofsky performance score (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 0.96) and improvement of performance status after surgery (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97) significantly affected survival after operation. Conclusions There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes and survival rates between posterior and AP surgery for metastatic lesions resulting from lung and hepatocellular cancer. Preoperative Karnofsky score and improvement of performance status had a significant impact on the survival rate following surgical treatment for these metastatic spine lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kee-Yong Ha
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung-Youl Park
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bartels RHMA, de Ruiter G, Feuth T, Arts MP. Prediction of life expectancy in patients with spinal epidural metastasis. Neuro Oncol 2015; 18:114-8. [PMID: 26254478 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of spinal epidural metastasis is multidisciplinary and usually involves a team of medical oncologists, radiologists, radiotherapists, and spinal surgeons. Life expectancy is one of the factors considered when deciding whether surgery is warranted. Because expert estimates of life expectancy are generally not reliable, a prediction model is needed. Here, we temporally validated a model that was previously validated geographically. METHODS The records of 110 consecutive patients who were referred with a spinal epidural metastasis were collected prospectively from 2009 to 2013 in order to validate the model, which was published in 2011. The actual and estimated life expectancies were represented graphically, and calibration and discrimination were determined. The calibration slope, Harrell's c-index, D, and R2D were calculated. Hazard ratios in the derivation set of 2011 were compared with the validation set. Misspecification was determined using the joint test for β*. RESULTS The calibration slope was 0.64 ± 0.15 (95% CI: 0.34-0.94), Harrell's c-index was 0.72, D was 1.08, and R2D was 0.22, indicating slightly worse discrimination in the derivation set. The joint test for β* = 0 was statistically significant and indicated misspecification; however, this misspecification was attributed entirely to the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS We validated a prediction model for surgical decision making, showing that the model's overall performance is good. Based on these results, this model will help clinicians to decide whether to offer surgery to patients with spinal epidural metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald H M A Bartels
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (R.H.M.A.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, The Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands (G.d.R., M.P.A.); Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (T.F.)
| | - Godard de Ruiter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (R.H.M.A.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, The Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands (G.d.R., M.P.A.); Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (T.F.)
| | - Ton Feuth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (R.H.M.A.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, The Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands (G.d.R., M.P.A.); Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (T.F.)
| | - Mark P Arts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (R.H.M.A.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, The Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands (G.d.R., M.P.A.); Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands (T.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Morgen SS, Nielsen DH, Larsen CF, Søgaard R, Engelholm SA, Dahl B. Moderate precision of prognostic scoring systems in a consecutive, prospective cohort of 544 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2014; 140:2059-64. [PMID: 25035249 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1776-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Improved survival among cancer patients and diverse conclusions from recent studies make it relevant to reassess the performance of the Tokuhashi Revised score and the Tomita score. The aim of this study was to validate and compare these two scoring systems in a recent and unselected cohort of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). METHODS In 2011, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 544 patients who were consecutively admitted with MSCC to one treatment facility. Patients estimated survival were assessed with the Tokuhashi Revised score and the Tomita score and compared to the observed survival. We assessed how precise the scoring systems predicted survival with McNemar's test. The prognostic value was illustrated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and the individual prognostic components were analyzed with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The mean age was 65 years (range 20-95), and 57 % of the patients were men. The majority of tumors were lung (23 %), prostate (21 %), and breast tumors (18 %). The overall precision of predicted survival was 58.7 % for the Tokuhashi Revised score and 52.9 % for the Tomita score. The observed survival in each of the scoring groups categorized by the scoring systems was statistically significantly different (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The Tokuhashi Revised score and the Tomita score are useful in categorizing patients into prognostic groups, and the individual components have important prognostic values. The Tokuhashi Revised score was most precise in predicting survival. However, due to the relatively low precision, we suggest that a modification of both scoring systems is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren Schmidt Morgen
- Spine Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Evaluation of scoring systems and prognostic factors in patients with spinal metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Spine J 2014; 14:2946-53. [PMID: 24912121 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Revised: 04/12/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The decision for operative treatment of patients with spinal metastases is dependent on the patient's predicted survival. Tokuhashi, Tomita, Bauer, and Oswestry scores have been devised for survival prediction; however, none of these systems have been evaluated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PURPOSE To investigate the accuracy of these scoring systems in predicting survival and to identify prognostic factors for survival of the patients with spinal metastases from NPC. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of the patients with spinal metastases from NPC who were treated in our institution. PATIENT SAMPLE The study included 87 patients with spinal metastases from NPC. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the survival time of these patients. The potential prognostic factors that are known to influence survival such as general condition, extraspinal bone metastases, vertebral bone metastases, visceral metastases, and neurologic assessment based on Frankel score were also studied. METHODS The predicted survival according to the four scoring systems were calculated and labeled as "A" scores. These patients were then rescored by assigning NPC as a good prognostic tumor and labeled as "B" scores. The predicted survival of scores A and B were compared with actual survival. Potential prognostic factors of survival were investigated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. For all scoring systems, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests were done; the predictive values were calculated using postestimation after Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The median overall survival for the whole cohort was 13 (range 1-120) months. In multivariate analysis, general condition (p<.01), visceral metastases (p<.01), and vertebral metastases (p<.01) showed significant association with survival. The absolute score of all scoring systems was significantly associated with actual survival, which extended to the different prognostic subgroups of each scoring systems. Log-rank test revealed significant differences in survival between the different prognostic subgroups of all scoring systems (p<.01). Predictive value of survival by modified Tokuhashi score was the highest among all four scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS Patients with spinal metastases from NPC have relatively good survival prognosis. All four scoring systems could be used to prognosticate these patients. The modified Tokuhashi score is the best in doing so.
Collapse
|
18
|
Daniel JW, Veiga JCE. Prognostic parameters and spinal metastases: a research study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e109579. [PMID: 25310095 PMCID: PMC4195682 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECT To identify pre-operative prognostic parameters for survival in patients with spinal epidural neoplastic metastasis when the primary tumour is unknown. METHODS This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent surgery for spinal epidural neoplastic metastases between February 1997 and January 2011. The inclusion criteria were as follows: known post-operative survival period, a Karnofsky Performance Score equal to or greater than 30 points and a post-operative neoplastic metastasis histological type. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate post-operative survival, and the Log-Rank test was used for statistical inference. RESULTS A total of 52 patients who underwent 52 surgical procedures were identified. The mean age at the time of spinal surgery was 53.92 years (std. deviation, 19.09). The median survival after surgery was 70 days (95% CI 49.97-90.02), and post-operative mortality occurred within 6 months in 38 (73.07%) patients. Lung cancer, prostate cancer, myeloma and lymphoma, the 4 most common primary tumour types, affected 32 (61.53%) patients. The three identified prognostic parameters were the following: pre-operative walking incapacity (American Spinal Injury Association, A and B), present in 86.53% of the patients (p-value = 0.107); special care dependency (Karnofsky Performance Score, 10-40 points), present in 90.38% of the patients (p-value = 0.322); and vertebral epidural neoplastic metastases that were in contact with the thecal sac (Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini, sector D), present in 94.23% of the patients (p-value = 0.643). When the three secondary prognostic parameters were combined, the mean post-operative survival was 45 days; when at least one was present, the survival was 82 days (p-value = 0.175). CONCLUSIONS Walking incapacity, special care dependency and contact between the neoplastic metastases and the thecal sac can help determine the ultimate survival of this patient population and, potentially, which patients would benefit from surgery versus palliation alone. A 2- to 3-month post-operative survival period justified surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson W. Daniel
- Division of Neurosurgery, Santa Casa de São Paulo - Faculty of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
- * E-mail:
| | - José C. E. Veiga
- Division of Neurosurgery, Santa Casa de São Paulo - Faculty of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tokuhashi Y, Uei H, Oshima M, Ajiro Y. Scoring system for prediction of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. World J Orthop 2014; 5:262-271. [PMID: 25035829 PMCID: PMC4095019 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Revised: 03/24/2014] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Assessing the prognosis before treatment for metastatic spine tumor is extremely important in therapy selection. Therefore, we review some prognostic scoring systems and their outcomes. Articles with combinations of two keywords among “metastatic spine tumor” and “prognosis”, “score”, “scoring system”, “predicting”, or “life expectancy” were searched for in PubMed. As a result, 236 articles were extracted. Those referring to representative scoring systems about predicting the survival of patients with metastatic spine tumors were used. The significance and limits of these scoring systems, and the future perspectives were described. Tokuhashi score, Tomita score, Baur score, Linden score, Rades score, and Katagiri score were introduced. They are all scoring systems prepared by combining factors that affect prognosis. The primary site of cancer and visceral metastasis were common factors in all of these scoring systems. Other factors selected to influence the prognosis varied. They were useful to roughly predict the survival period, such as, “more than one year or not” or “more than six months or not”. In particular, they were utilized for decision-making about operative indications and avoidance of excessive medical treatment. Because the function depended on the survival period in the patients with metastatic spine tumor, it was also utilized in assessing functional prognosis. However, no scoring system had more than 90% consistency between the predicted and actual survival periods. Future perspectives should adopt more oncological viewpoints with adjustment of the process of treatment for metastatic spine tumor.
Collapse
|
20
|
Yuk-Nam Y, Ka-Kin C, Tai-Chung L, Hung-On C, Yuk-Yin C. A Study of the Predictive Value of the Modified Tokuhashi Score in Metastatic Spinal Tumour Causing Cord Compression in a Southern Chinese Population. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jotr.2013.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction It is generally agreed that operative intervention is beneficial in carefully selected groups of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Tokuhashi et al have presented a preoperative scoring system to predict patient survival, which is widely used as a guideline for making a decision on whether to operate or not. However, only limited data are available regarding the validity of the Tokuhashi score in Southern Chinese populations. Materials and methods We report a series of 128 patients treated in our hospital from 2000 to 2010. All patients were diagnosed to have spinal metastasis of different origins with cord compression. Of the 128, 59 underwent operation and the remaining 69 received conservative treatments. The Tokuhashi score was then calculated retrospectively. The survival rate was analysed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In our series, the accuracy of the modified Tokuhashi scoring for predicting the survival rate in patients with MSCC was demonstrated to be 79% (101/128). The poor prognostic group showed statistically significant worse survival than the two better prognostic groups. The type of primary cancer (p = 0.0015), visceral metastasis (p = 0.006), and the general condition (p < 0.001) were confirmed as significant survival prognostic factors. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) had the most favourable outcome with a mean survival of 20.1 months. Conclusion The modified Tokuhashi score was statistically correlated to the overall survival of MSCC patients in a Southern Chinese population. The type of primary cancer, visceral metastasis, and the general condition were statistically significant survival factors. We recommend weighting a higher score for NPC in the modified Tokuhashi scoring system in view of its favourable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeung Yuk-Nam
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Cheung Ka-Kin
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Lam Tai-Chung
- Department of Oncology Tuen Mun Hospital Tuen Mun New Territories Hong Kong
| | - Cheng Hung-On
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Chow Yuk-Yin
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oliveira MFD, Barros BDA, Rotta JM, Botelho RV. Tokuhashi Scoring System has limited applicability in the majority of patients with spinal cord compression secondary to vertebral metastasis. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2014; 71:798-801. [PMID: 24212518 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20130125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2013] [Accepted: 07/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Spine is the primary bone site affected by systemic metastasis. Although there are scales that attempt to manage these patients, their real applicability is unknown. The Tokuhashi Scoring System (TSS) is a widely used prognostic tool. At the time of treatment, the data necessary to complete TSS may be incomplete, making its application impossible. Objective To evaluate the number of TSS scores completed by the time the clinical therapeutic decision was made. Methods From July 2010 to January 2012, we selected patients who were diagnosed with spinal metastases. Results Sixty spinal metastasis patients (21 female, 39 male) were evaluated between July 2010 and January 2012. At the time of the treatment decision, only 25% of the patients had completed the TSS items. Conclusion In the majority of patients with vertebral metastasis, TSS variables cannot be applied.
Collapse
|
22
|
Putz C, Gantz S, Bruckner T, Moradi B, Helbig L, Gerner H, Akbar M. Preoperative Scoring and Limits of Prognostication: Functional Outcome after Surgical Decompression in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. Oncology 2014; 86:177-84. [DOI: 10.1159/000358597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 01/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
23
|
Shiue K, Sahgal A, Chow E, Lutz ST, Chang EL, Mayr NA, Wang JZ, Cavaliere R, Mendel E, Lo SS. Management of metastatic spinal cord compression. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 10:697-708. [DOI: 10.1586/era.10.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
24
|
Pre- and postoperative lower extremity motor power and ambulatory status of patients with spinal cord compression due to a metastatic spinal tumor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:E798-802. [PMID: 23532120 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182927559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of medical records. OBJECTIVE To describe pre- and postoperative ambulatory status and lower limb motor power, and compare characteristics of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) who were ambulatory at 48 hours postoperatively with those of patients with MSCC who were nonambulatory. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Preoperative motor power of the lower extremities is a predictor of postoperative ambulatory status in patients with MSCC. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 102 consecutive patients with MSCC who presented for decompressive surgery with lower extremity weakness between January 1997 and December 2010. A single surgeon classified the preoperative and 48-hour postoperative motor power of the lower extremities on a 6-point scale. Ambulation status was determined 48 hours after surgery and patients were classified as ambulatory (including normal ambulation, ambulation with aid, and ambulation without aid) or nonambulatory. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between patients who were ambulatory and those who were nonambulatory at 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS Motor power was improved 1.05 ± 0.73 grades after operation. Two-thirds of patients who were preoperatively classified as nonambulatory were ambulatory at 48 hours postoperatively. The only significantly different affecting factor between the postoperative ambulatory group and the nonambulatory group was preoperative lower extremity power and preoperative capability of ambulation. In addition, grade III of lower extremity motor power was significant criteria for postoperative ambulation. CONCLUSION We recommend aggressive decompressive surgery in patients with MSCC if preoperative lower extremity motor power is at least grade III, although all groups of preoperative lower extremity motor power had 1 or more patients who returned to ambulation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
25
|
Quraishi NA, Manoharan SR, Arealis G, Khurana A, Elsayed S, Edwards KL, Boszczyk BM. Accuracy of the revised Tokuhashi score in predicting survival in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2013; 22 Suppl 1:S21-6. [PMID: 23328875 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2649-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2012] [Revised: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 12/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The revised Tokuhashi score has been widely used to evaluate indications for surgery and predict survival in patients with metastatic spinal disease. Our aim was to analyse the actual survival time of patients treated for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) in comparison with the predicted survival based on the revised Tokuhashi score. This would thereby allow us to determine the overall predictive value of this scoring system. METHODS This study was a semi-prospective clinical study of all patients with MSCC presenting to our unit over 8 years-data from October 2003 to December 2009 were collected retrospectively and from December 2009, all data collected prospectively to October 2011. Patients were divided into three groups--Group 1 (Tokuhashi score 0-8, n = 84), Group 2 (Tokuhashi score 9-11, n = 83) and Group 3 (Tokuhashi score 12-15, n = 34). Data collected included demographic data, primary tumour histology, surgery type and complications, neurological outcome (Frankel grade) and survival. RESULTS A total of 233 patients with MSCC were managed surgically in our unit during this time. Out of these complete data were available on 201 patients for analysis. Mean age of patients was 61 years (range 18-86; 127 M, 74 F). The primary tumour type was Breast (n = 29, 15 %), Haematological (n = 28, 14 %), Renal (n = 26, 13 %), Prostate (n = 26, 13 %), Lung (n = 23, 11 %), Gastro-intestinal (n = 11, 5 %), Sarcoma (n = 9, 4 %) and others (n = 49, 24 %). All patients included in the study had surgical intervention in the form of decompression and stabilisation. Posterior decompression and stabilisation was performed in 171 patients (with vertebrectomy in 31), combined anterior and posterior approaches were used in 18 patients and 12 had an anterior approach only. The overall complication rate was 19 % (39/201)--the most common being wound infection (n = 15, 8 %). There was no difference in the neurological outcome (Frankel grade) between Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.34) or Groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.70). However, there was a significant difference between Groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.001), with Group 3 having a significantly better neurological outcome. Median survival was 93 days in Group 1, 229 days in Group 2 and 875 days in Group 3 (p = 0.001). The predictive value between the actual and predicted survival was 64 % (Group 1), 64 % (Group 2) and 69 % (Group 3). The overall predictive value of the revised Tokuhashi score using Cox regression for all groups was 66 %. CONCLUSION We would conclude that although the predictive value of the Tokuhashi score in terms of survival time is at best modest (66 %), the fact that there were statistically significant differences in survival between the groups looked at in this paper indicates that the scoring system, and the components which it consists of, are important in the evaluation of these patients when considering surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Quraishi
- Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Campus of Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hernandez-Fernandez A, Vélez R, Lersundi-Artamendi A, Pellisé F. External validity of the Tokuhashi score in patients with vertebral metastasis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2012; 138:1493-500. [PMID: 22526160 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-012-1222-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2012] [Accepted: 04/03/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To calculate the accuracy of the Tokuhashi score (TS) in recent patients with vertebral metastasis (VM), candidates or not to surgical treatment, and thus to assess the external validity of TS. METHODS Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 90 patients (55 men, 35 women) with VM between 2004 and 2006. For each patient, data on the primary tumor (PT), date of diagnosis, TS at the time of VM diagnosis and date of death were retrieved from the electronic medical records and civil registry. True survival time and TS survival time were estimated to calculate the accuracy rate of the TS. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to study the survival function by prognostic groups. A correlation study between survival time and other variables was performed. RESULTS PT distribution was as follows: breast (22.2 %), lung (20 %), prostate (17.8 %), rectum (10 %), unknown (11 %), and others (18 %). Average overall survival after the VM diagnosis was 11.8 months (SD, 11 m): breast, 20 months (SD, 20 m); lung, 5.8 months (SD, 5.9 m); prostate, 14.5 months (SD, 13.4 m); rectum, 9.4 months (SD, 9.3); and unknown tumors, 2.7 months (SD, 5 m). Survival time was accurately predicted with the TS in 63 % of patients with a short life expectancy (survival, <6 months; TS, 0-8), 16 % of patients in the intermediate group (survival, 6-12 months; TS, 9-11), and 77 % of patients with a good prognosis (survival >12 months; TS, 12-15). By specific PT, the accuracy rate of the TS was low for breast cancer metastasis (35 %). The Kaplan-Meier curves show a significant separation among the prognostic groups (p < 0.05), but the log-rank test showed a statistically significant difference in survival only between short expectancy group and good prognostic group. Age at PT diagnosis and at VM diagnosis negatively correlated with survival (r = 0.22; p = 0.032 and r = 0.3, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The TS was not highly accurate for predicting survival in patients with VM, treated or not surgically, and it was particularly imprecise in patients with an intermediate score (9-11 points) and those with breast cancer, so it is possible that the TS currently has a poor external validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Hernandez-Fernandez
- Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Gipuzkoa Building), Hospital Universitario Donostia, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 107, 20014, San Sebastián, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Park JH, Rhim SC, Jeon SR. Efficacy of decompression and fixation for metastatic spinal cord compression: analysis of factors prognostic for survival and postoperative ambulation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011; 50:434-40. [PMID: 22259690 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.5.434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2011] [Revised: 07/14/2011] [Accepted: 11/21/2011] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goals of surgical intervention for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) are prolonging survival and improving quality of life. Non-ambulatory paraplegic patients, either at presentation or after treatment, have a much shorter life expectancy than ambulatory patients. We therefore analyzed prognostic factors for survival and postoperative ambulation in patients surgically treated for MSCC. METHODS We assessed 103 patients with surgically treated MSCC who presented with lower extremity weakness between January 2001 and December 2008. Factors prognostic for overall survival (OS) and postoperative ambulation, including surgical method, age, sex, primary tumor site, metastatic spinal site, surgical levels, Tokuhashi score, and treatment with chemo- or radiation therapy, were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS Median OS was significantly longer in the postoperatively ambulatory group [11.0 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 9.29-12.71 months] than in the non-ambulatory group (5.0 months; 95% CI, 1.80-8.20 months) (p=0.035). When we compared median OS in patients with high (9-11) and low (0-8) Tokuhashi scores, they were significantly longer in the former (15.0 months; 95% CI, 9.29-20.71 months vs. 9.0 months; 95% CI, 7.48-10.52 months; p=0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative ambulation with or without aid [odds ratio (OR) 5.35; 95% CI 1.57-18.17; p=0.007] and hip flexion power greater than grade III (OR 6.23; 95% CI, 1.29-7.35; p=0.038) were prognostic of postoperative ambulation. CONCLUSION We found that postoperative ambulation and preoperative high Tokuhashi score were significantly associated with longer patient survival. In addition, preoperative hip flexion power greater than grade III was critical for postoperative ambulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Hoon Park
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Due to the uncertainty of the course of diagnoses, patients with neuro-oncological malignancies present challenges to the physical therapist. At times, the presentation of impairments and disabilities of these patients with neuro-oncological diagnoses do not necessarily coincide with the involved area of the brain or spinal cord. It is our intention to provide guidance to the physical therapist who will be working with these patients with neuro-oncological diagnoses, in hopes that their encounters will be more productive and meaningful. This article describes a brief overview of common central nervous system malignancies, its medical treatment, as well as possible complications and side effects that would need to be considered in rehabilitating these patients. Special consideration is given to the elderly patients with neuro-oncological diagnoses. Pertinent physical therapy assessments and interventions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willie Ching
- Staff Physical Therapist, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Physical Therapy Section, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Melissa Luhmann
- Staff Physical Therapist, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Physical Therapy Section, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Actual and predicted survival time of patients with spinal metastases of lung cancer: evaluation of the robustness of the Tokuhashi score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36:983-9. [PMID: 21217434 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181e8f7f8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN In a retrospective analysis we evaluated the achieved and the predicted survival times according to the Tokuhashi score for patients with spinal metastases of lung cancer (lc). OBJECTIVE Our aim was to investigate the robustness of the Tokuhashi Score for this group of patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The decision on operative versus conservative treatment for cancer patients with vertebral metastases depend on their predicted lifespan. Although the score of Tokuhashi is commonly used for prognostic predictions, it's reliability for specific tumor types (e.g., lc), has not been validated. METHODS Seventy-six patients who had undergone spinal surgery for lc metastases between 1999 and 2004 were verified according to the Tokuhashi score and predicted versus achieved survival times were compared. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) after surgery for all patients was 108 (3-1767) days (102 [5-1767] days for patients with NSCLC [n = 49; 64.5%] and 108 [3-473] days for patients with SCLC [n = 24; 31.6%]). Survival times differed depending on the time period of procedure performance (OS 81 [3-435] days for patients operated between 1999 and 2001 [n = 38], 135 [8-1767] days for patients who received surgery between 2002 and 2004 [n = 38]). Actual and predicted survival were similar in 51 of 76 cases (67.1%), while there was no correlation in 25 of 76 (32.9%) cases. Results were comparable for all histologic subgroups. CONCLUSION Although the survival time of patients with vertebral metastases from lc has increased over the last 10 years, the overall outcome is still poor. For the prediction of an individual prognosis in the group of lc patients the score of Tokuhashi seems to be a suboptimal tool. We conclude that therapeutic decisions for such patients should be made based on interdisciplinary platforms, especially in the light of improved systemic treatment options.
Collapse
|
30
|
Re: Chi JH, Gokaslan Z, Chi JH, Gokaslan Z, et al. Selecting treatment for patients with malignant epidural spinal cord compression--does age matter? Results from a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2009;34:431-5. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:1884-5. [PMID: 19644342 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181adc9a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|