Avascular necrosis (AVN) after internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures is a progressive multifactorial disease that ultimately results in local ischemia with ensuing osteocyte necrosis and structural compromise. This disease can cause significant clinical morbidity and affects patients of any age, including young and active patients. Effective treatment of this condition among young adults is challenging due to their high functional demands. The aim of managing AVN is to relieve pain, preserve range of movement and improve function. Treatment methods vary depending on the stage of the disease and can be broadly categorised into two options, hip preserving surgery and hip arthroplasty. Although, hip preserving techniques are attractive in the young adult, they may alter the morphology of the proximal femur and make subsequent arthroplasty more challenging. Conversely, arthroplasty in the young adult may require repeat revision procedures throughout the patient's life. Current evidence suggests that modifications of prevailing treatments, in addition to new technologies, have led to the development of management strategies that may be able to alter the course of femoral head osteonecrosis. This review aims to summarise the options available for treatment of AVN in the young adult and review the clinical results.

Only a limited number of reports of total hip replacements (THRs) in patients with Gaucher disease (GD) have been published, with the majority showing high rates of early aseptic loosening as well as an increased number of peri-operative complications. We present a series of twelve THRs in nine affected patients, with a mean age of 39 years at the time of surgery (median 37 years; range 27-60 years). We examine the medium- to long-term results and present the outcome scores, survival, and assess the effect of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Four hips (33.3%) required revision for aseptic loosening at a mean time of 11.5 years. There was no significant difference in survival between the group on ERT at the time of surgery and group not on ERT. Those on ERT did, however, have fewer peri-operative complications and there was a trend to better outcome scores. Five of the 12 THRs were performed when the diagnosis of GD was unknown and all of these had early complications.?Our results show better survival of THRs in patients with GD than previously thought. The use of ERT pre-operatively did not have an effect on survival, nor outcome scores, but did reduce the peri-operative complication rate. Those not on ERT at the time of surgery were commenced on it at some point in their treatment (at an average of 8.6 years following THR) and we believe the use of ERT, at any time in the treatment, could have contributed to the improved survival seen in our series compared to historical results in the literature.

There has been a limited amount of research on risk factors for revision due to infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA), probably due to low absolute numbers of revisions. We therefore studied patient- and surgery-related risk factors for revision due to infection after primary THA in a population-based setting.

Using the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, we identified 80,756 primary THAs performed in Denmark between Jan 1, 1995 and Dec 31, 2008. We used Cox regression analysis to compute crude and adjusted relative risk (RR) of revision due to infection. Revision was defined as extraction or exchange of any component due to infection. The median follow-up time was 5 (0–14) years.

597 primary THAs (0.7%) were revised due to infection. Males, patients with any co-morbidity, patients operated due to non-traumatic avascular femoral head necrosis, and patients with long duration of surgery had an increased RR of revision due to infection within the total follow-up time. A tendency of increased RR of revision was found for patients who had received cemented THA without antibiotic and hybrid THA relative to patients with cementless implants. Hip diagnosis and fixation technique were not associated with risk of revision due to infection within 1 year of surgery (short-term risk).

We identified several categories of THA patients who had a higher risk of revision due to infection. Further research is required to explain the mechanism underlying this increased risk. More attention should be paid by clinicians to infection prevention strategies in patients with THA, particularly those with increased risk.