To investigate whether tibial-sided anterolateral ligament (ALL) injuries are associated with poor healing and residual pivot shift.

Patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions within postinjury 6 weeks from January 2008 to March 2021 were included. They had concomitant ALL injury confirmed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were followed for a minimum of 20 months. Preoperative ALL injury was graded by the Muramatsu classification, and postoperative ALL healing were graded by a modification of the Lee classification (good, partial, and nonvisualized). The patients were allocated to an improved group (IG) and an unimproved group (UG) on the basis of a comparison of pre- and postoperative MRI. ALL tear site, postoperative knee stability, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale (patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) were compared between the 2 groups.

In total, 128 patients were enrolled; 94.5% patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference for PROs, respectively. The ALL was torn at the femoral side in 46.9% patients, at midsubstance in 31.2.%, and at tibial side in 21.9%, Preoperatively, 86 (67.2%) patients had a partial tear, and 42 (32.8%) patients had a complete tear. On the basis of the postoperative MRI appearances, 38 (29.7%) and 90 (70.3%) patients were allocated to the IG and UG, respectively. The tibial-side tears were significantly frequent in the UG (P = .032). Pivot shift showed a significantly greater incidence in the UG than IG (P = .004). Lachman test and PROs did not differ between the 2 groups.

Tibial-sided ALL tears occurred in 18.7% of the UG compared with 3.2% of the IG, and 45.6% of the UG had a postoperative grade 1 or 2 pivot shift compared with 15.8% of the IG. Percentages of patients with the minimal clinically important difference for PROs did not differ between the 2 groups. However, the clinical relevance is limited by a high transfer bias.

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

To assess the frequency of anterolateral ligament (ALL) tears and ramp lesions (RL) detected with MRI in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and to describe associated injuries indicative for these lesions.

In this retrospective study, 164 patients with surgically verified ACL tears were included. Preoperative MRI scans were reviewed for ALL tears and different types of RL. All coexisting meniscal tears, tears of the medial (MCL) and lateral collateral band (LCL), and posterior-medial tibial bone marrow edema (BME) were recorded. The frequency of ALL tears and RL was assessed and coexisting injuries were correlated using Pearson's chi-square test. A p < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. In cases of multiple testing, Bonferroni's correction was applied.

ALL tears and RL combined were detected in 28 patients (17.1%), ALL tears in 48 patients (29.3%), and RL in 54 patients (32.9%) which were significantly associated to each other. ALL tears were significantly associated with tears of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM), BME, and with tears of the LCL and MCL. RL were significantly associated with tears of the posterior horn of the medial (PHMM) and PHLM, with BME, and with tears of the LCL.

ACL tears are associated with RL or ALL tears in about one-third of cases and with both lesions combined in about one-fifth of cases. ALL tears and RL are significantly associated with additional posttraumatic injuries, which can thus be indicative of these lesions.

• ACL tears were associated with ramp lesions or ALL tears in about one-third of the cases. • Ramp lesions and ALL tears were significantly associated with each other, tear in the PHLM, tear in the LCL, and BME. • ALL tears were more frequently associated with instable classified ramp lesion type 4b and type 5.

The association between injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, and medial meniscus (MM) has been known to orthopedic surgeons since 1936; O'Donoghue first used the term "unhappy triad" of the knee to describe this condition in 1950. Later studies revealed that involvement of the lateral meniscus is more common than MM in these cases, leading to a change in the definition. Recent studies have revealed that this triad may be primarily linked to knee anterolateral complex injuries. Although there is not a definite management protocol for this triad, we try to mention the most recent concepts about it in addition to expert opinions.

Bone bruises and concomitant ligament injuries after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have attracted attention, but their correlation and potential clinical significance remain unclear.

To assess the relationship between bone bruises and concomitant ligamentous injuries in ACL injuries.

Systematic review.

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was completed from inception to October 20, 2021. All articles that evaluated the relationship between bone bruises and related ligaments injuries were included. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessment as well as Review Manager 5.3 was used for data analysis.

A total of 19 studies evaluating 3292 patients were included. After meta-analysis, anterolateral ligament (ALL) injuries were associated with bone bruising on the lateral tibial plateau (LTP) (RR = 2.33; 95% CI 1.44-3.77; p = 0.0006), lateral femoral condyle (LFC) (RR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.37-2.85; p = 0.0003) and medial tibial plateau (MTP) (RR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.24-2.11; p = 0.0004); Moreover, medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries were associated with bone bruising on the femur (RR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.17-1.90; p = 0.001), and no statistical significance was found between bone bruising on the MTP and Kaplan fiber (KF) injuries (RR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.00-2.49; p = 0.05). Nonetheless, the current evidence did not conclude that bone bruises were associated with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries.

For individuals with an ACL injury, bone bruises of the LTP, LFC, and MTP can assist in the diagnosis of ALL injuries. Furthermore, femoral bruising has potential diagnostic value for MCL injuries. Knowing these associations allows surgeons to be alert to ACL-related ligament injuries on MRI and during operations in future clinical practice.

Despite successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, many patients continue to experience persistent anterolateral rotatory instability. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is used to address this instability by harvesting a portion of the iliotibial band, passing it underneath the fibular collateral ligament, and attaching it just proximal and posterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle. Based on the most recent clinical evidence, the addition of LET to ACL reconstruction improves clinical outcomes, which has led to an increase in the use of this technique.

To provide an overview of the postoperative complications of the LET procedure and their associated imaging findings, with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Narrative review.

In this scoping review, the authors reviewed available radiographic, computed tomography, and MRI scans of patients who experienced postoperative complications after ACL reconstruction with LET, in which the complication was determined to be from the LET procedure. Images were reviewed and subsequently described by an on-staff musculoskeletal radiologist.

The authors found 9 different complications associated with LET: graft failure, hematoma, infection, chronic pain, tunnel convergence, fixation device migration, muscular hernia, peroneal nerve palsy, and knee stiffness. They supplemented these findings with radiographic evidence from 6 patients.

As extra-articular reconstruction techniques including LET become more popular among orthopaedic surgeons, it is important that radiologists and surgeons be adept at recognizing the normal imaging findings of LET and associated complications.

The aim of the current study was to objectify the rotational laxity after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction by instrumented measurement. It was hypothesized that knees with recurrent instability feature a higher internal rotation laxity as compared to knees with a primary rupture of the native ACL.

Cross-sectional study, Level of evidence III.

In a clinical cross-sectional study successive patients with primary ACL rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction were evaluated clinically and by instrumented measurement of the rotational and antero-posterior laxity with a validated instrument and the KT1000^®, respectively. Clinical examination comprised IKDC 2000 forms, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale. Power calculation and statistical analysis were performed (p value < 0.05).

24 patients with primary ACL rupture and 23 patients with ACL rerupture were included. There was no significant side-to-side difference in anterior translation. A side-to side difference of internal rotational laxity ≥ 10° was found significantly more frequent in reruptures (53.6%) compared to primary ruptures (19.4%; p < 0.001). A highly significant relationship between the extent of the pivot-shift phenomenon and side-to-side difference of internal rotation laxity could be demonstrated (p < 0.001). IKDC 2000 subjective revealed significantly better scores in patients with primary ACL tear compared to patients with ACL rerupture (56.4 ± 7.8 vs. 50.8 ± 6.2; p = 0.01). Patients with primary ACL tears scored significantly better on the Tegner Activity Scale (p = 0.02). No significant differences were seen in the Lysholm Score (p = 0.78).

Patients with ACL rerupture feature significantly higher internal rotation laxity of the knee compared to primary ACL rupture. The extend of rotational laxity can be quantified by instrumented measurements. This can be valuable data for the indication of an anterolateral ligament reconstruction in ACL revision surgery.

The aims of this study were: 1. To evaluate the use of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance as a measurement showing rotational instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. 2. To determine the effect of concomitant anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury on TT-TG distance.

Knee magnetic resonance (MR) images of 251 patients were retrospectively evaluated to compare the study group (131 patients) who underwent ACL reconstruction due to acute complete ACL injury and the control group (120 patients) without any trauma and/or patellofemoral instability. The rate of secondary signs of ACL injury (Anterolateral ligament injury, Kissing lesion, Anterior tibial translocation, Buckling of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)) in the study group was noted. The relationship between the TT-TG distance and other secondary signs was examined.

TT-TG distance was measured as 10.83 ± 1.2 mm, 12.88 ± 1.1 mm, 14.17 ± 1.5 mm in control, isolated ACL and ACL + ALL groups, respectively (p < 0.05). TT-TG distance was significantly higher in the patients with ALL injury and kissing lesions than the patients without these lesions (p ˂ 0.05). TT-TG distance did not differ significantly between the patients with and without anterior tibial translocation or buckling of the PCL (p ˃ 0.05). TT-TG distance measurements showed significant interobserver 0.994 (0.992-0.996) and intraobserver 0.997 (0.996-0.998) correlation.

TT-TG distance measurement can be used as a reliable quantitative measure of the increased rotational instability after ACL injury. TT-TG distance increases significantly if there is an ALL injury accompanying the ACL injury.

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) and capsule of the knee are anatomical structures involved in rotational stability and pivot-shift control. As such, it has been demonstrated that the extra-articular anterolateral procedures improve clinical outcome when performed as an augmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in specific groups of patients. This review describes the postoperative imaging findings of two techniques used to perform these procedures, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and radiography. The first technique described is the lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), which uses a strip of the iliotibial band that is harvested, passed underneath the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and fixed posterior, and proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE), preserving ITB insertion on Gerdy's tubercle. The second technique described is the ALL reconstruction, a procedure that attempts to recreate the anatomy of the ALL, using most often a gracilis autograft. In this procedure, femoral fixation is performed proximal and posterior to the LFE, and tibial fixation is slightly distal to the joint line, halfway from Gerdy's tubercle to the fibular head. The main objective of this review is to provide an overview of the postoperative imaging aspects of these two procedures with MRI, CT, and radiography and to describe possible complications. As they become more common, it is important for the radiologist and the orthopedic surgeon to understand their particularities in combination with the already well-known ACL reconstruction.