This study aimed to investigate association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological findings of degenerated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in knee osteoarthritis (OA), and based on this result, to develop a new ACL degeneration grading system by MRI that corresponds to histological findings of degenerated ACL.

MRI signal intensity of the ACL could correspond to histological findings of collagen degeneration.

A collection of 106 ACL specimens from 85 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty was investigated for signal intensity of the ACL and muscle on axial Fat-saturated proton density-weighted MRI and MRI signal intensity ratio (ACL/muscle) was calculated. The correlation between ACL histological degeneration and MRI ACL/muscle signal intensity ratio was analyzed. The ACL was stratified into 3 grades based on signal intensity relative to muscle intensity (grade 1, low; grade 2, iso; and grade 3, high), and the extent to ACL degeneration in each MRI ACL degeneration grade was evaluated.

Collagen degeneration (53.5±24.0%) and myxoid change (25.2±18.8%) in degenerated ACL significantly correlated with MRI signal intensity ratio of the ACL/muscle (r=0.62, p<0.0001; r=0.67, p<0.0001). ACL were assigned to grade 1 (n=22 [20.8%]), grade 2 (n=56 [52.8%]), and grade 3 (n=28 [26.4%]). ACL collagen degeneration was 34.8±18.4% in grade 1, 49.3±21.7% in grade 2, and 76.6±12.0% in grade 3. ACL myxoid change was 10.0±11.3% in grade 1, 21.3±14.1% in grade 2, and 45.0±15.3% in grade 3.

The ACL/muscle signal intensity ratio on MRI correlated with the extent to ACL myxoid degeneration. The new MRI ACL degeneration grade is helpful to estimate the extent to ACL myxoid degeneration in knee OA.

III; retrospective cohort study.

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR TKA) results in kinematics closer to the native knee and in greater patient satisfaction but information concerning its outcome and complications is lacking.The goal of this study is to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of BCR prosthesis implanted using a spacer-based gap balancing technique and to assess if some preoperative factors are associated with a worse prognosis.A cohort of 207 knees in 194 patients who underwent BCR TKA, with a minimum 1-year follow-up, was retrospectively analyzed.Patients were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and then every following year postoperatively, and filled questionnaires (Knee Society and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) at every visit. Clinical and radiological assessments included range of motion, knee alignment, pain, and complications as defined by the Knee Society's Standardized list and definition of Complication of Total Knee Arthroplasty.Forty-three knees (20.8%) suffered major complications. Twenty-one knees (10.1%) underwent revision at an average of 32.1 months after the index procedure. Revision-free survival at 100 months was 85.7%. Revision was performed for aseptic tibial loosening in eight knees (3.9%) and stiffness in five knees (2.4%). There were 29 reoperations other than revision (14.0%), the most frequent procedure being manipulation under anesthesia in 14 knees (6.8%). Minor complications included tendonitis (20.8%), persistent synovitis (6.8%), and superficial wound infections (6.3%).All outcomes scores were greatly improved at the 1-year follow-up compared with preoperatively (p < 0.001). However, maximum flexion at the last follow-up was significantly reduced compared with preoperatively (mean maximum flexion ± standard deviation: 119.9 ± 15.6 vs. 129.9 ± 14.4, p < 0.001). Aseptic tibial loosening was associated with a hypercorrection in varus of preoperative valgus knees (p = 0.012).BCR TKA can give functional results similar to other types of prostheses but involves a substantial risk of complications. Important factors that can explain failed BCR TKA and guide its use were identified, more particularly knee alignment and its role in aseptic tibial loosening.

Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen renewed interest due to the potential for more natural knee kinematics with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) retention.

The present study attempts to determine differences in the 2-year survivorship and patient-reported outcomes between two surgical strategies (traditional instrumentation versus robotics) applied to the extensive use of a modern, 2nd generation BCR TKA design.

We performed a retrospective study with prospectively collected data of 113 patients who underwent primary TKA between 2018 and 2020 using a 2nd generation BCR TKA implant. Patient demographics, PROMS, and intra/post-operative complications were collected. Patients were also evaluated according to the use or not of robotics. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate revision-free survival at follow up.

102 patients were enrolled: 90 received traditional surgery and 12 robotic-assisted surgery. The mean age was 68 years (SD 7.76) with an average BMI of 29.6 kg/m2 (SD 3.56). The mean follow up (FU) was 32.4 ± 6.2 months (range 24-45 months). Survivorship at 2 years was 98% (95% CI: 92.4-99.5). Revisions/reoperations were performed for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear (1/4), pain (1/4), arthrofibrosis (1/4) and acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (1/4). At final FU, 92 patients (90.2%) considered themselves satisfied, showing a mean OKS of 40.6 (SD 5.1) and a mean FKS of 76.7 (SD 11.8). No differences in the outcome were found between traditional and robotic-assisted procedures.

The modern BCR design evaluated in this study achieved excellent results in terms of implant survivorship, low rate of reoperation and clinical results, independently from the use of enabling technologies.

To clarify the association between pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and bones for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) design and with fixed bearing posterior stabilized (PS) design. This retrospective cohort study included 40 BCR TKAs and 50 PS TKAs. Pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and bones were measured by three-dimensional assessment based on computed tomography imaging. The mean value and percentage within ± 5° of pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches were compared between BCR TKA and PS TKA. Correlations between pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and bones were investigated in BCR TKA and PS TKA. There was no significant difference in mean preoperative rotational mismatch of femorotibial components and bones between BCR TKA and PS TKA. Mean postoperative rotational mismatch of femorotibial components and bones was significantly greater in BCR TKA than in PS TKA. Postoperative rotational mismatch of the femorotibial components was within ± 5° in 21 knees (52.5%) for BCR TKA and in 43 knees (86.0%) for PS TKA. The rate of postoperative rotational mismatch of the femorotibial components and bones within ± 5° was significantly lower for BCR TKA than for PS TKA. In BCR TKA, there was a positive correlation between pre- and postoperative rotational mismatches of the femorotibial components and of bones. We consider these results can be attributed to the retention of both cruciate ligaments, which may affect the reduction of rotational permittance of the components and bones.

Despite the advent of innovative knee prosthesis design, a consistent first-option knee implant design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remained unsettled. This study aimed to compare the clinical effects among posterior-stabilized (PS), cruciate-retaining (CR), bi-cruciate substituting (BCS), and bi-cruciate retaining designs for primary TKA.

Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from inception up to July 30, 2021. The primary outcomes were the range of knee motion (ROM), and the secondary outcomes were the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication and revision rates. Confidence in evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed for synthesis.

A total of 15 RCTs and 18 cohort studies involving 3520 knees were included. The heterogeneity and inconsistency were acceptable. There was a significant difference in ROM at the early follow-up when PS was compared with CR (mean difference [MD] = 3.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 7.18) and BCS was compared with CR (MD = 9.69, 95% CI 2.18, 17.51). But at the long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in ROM in any one knee implant compared with the others. No significant increase was found in the PROMs and complication and revision rates at the final follow-up time.

At early follow-up after TKA, PS and BCS knee implants significantly outperform the CR knee implant in ROM. But in the long run, the available evidence suggests different knee prostheses could make no difference in clinical outcomes after TKA with extended follow-up.

Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) prostheses may improve satisfaction of patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether BCR prostheses provide better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilized (PS) prostheses.

This is a randomized single-blind control trial involving a total of 77 patients with knee osteoarthritis, randomly assigned to undergo TKA with a BCR or PS implant between 2015 and 2019. Mean follow-up period was 39 months. Clinical and demographic data were extracted manually from medical records. Data acquisition included patient demographics, knee range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes via KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 scores.

A total of 38 patients were randomized to the PS group and 39 to the BCR group. At the 5-year follow-up, no statistical differences were noted for knee range of motion or patient-reported outcomes between the two groups, except for a greater knee flexion in the early follow-up period in the PS group. Five adverse events occurred in the BCR group compared to none in the PS group (p = 0.02).

BCR TKA yield similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes 5 years following the intervention compared with PS TKA. The BCR TKA had more complications.

I (Randomized Controlled Trial).

Bicruciate retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was designed to simulate natural knee kinematics and improve proprioception by retaining both the ACL and PCL. While the prospect of the design appears favorable to patients, previous designs have demonstrated modest survivorship rates compared to traditional designs. This study aims to report the early functional outcomes and implant survivorship of a novel BCR design.

A multi-center, retrospective study was conducted identifying BCR TKA patients from 2016 to 2017. Patient demographics, quality outcomes, and post-operative complications were collected. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate revision-free survival.

One-hundred thirty-three patients with a mean follow-up time of 2.35 ± 0.25 years (range: 2.00-2.87 years) were identified. Patients receiving BCR TKA were, on average, 61.46 ± 9.27 years-old, obese (BMI = 31.80 ± 6.01 kg/m²), predominantly white (71.4%), and female (69.9%). The device was most often implanted using standard instruments (85.7%) compared to computer-assisted navigation (13.5%). Average length-of-stay was 1.77 ± 0.97 days. Six patients had a reoperation; three (2.5%) full revisions occurred for: infection (n = 1), arthrofibrosis (n = 1), and ACL rupture (n = 1); one (0.8%) tibial revision occurred for: arthrofibrosis; two (1.5%) liner exchanges occurred for: infection (n = 1) and arthrofibrosis (n = 1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of cumulative failure at 2-year showed a survival rate of 96.2% (95% confidence interval, 91.2-98.4%) for all-cause reoperation, 97.3% (91.6-99.1%) for aseptic revision, and 100% for mechanical failure.

Survivorship was 96.2% for all-cause reoperation, 97.3% for aseptic revision, and 100% for mechanical implant failure at 2-years. This novel BCR TKA demonstrated no implant-related complications and excellent survivorship outcomes over 2 years with comparable revision rates to those previously reported in the literature.

There has been no consensus on the benefit of retaining the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in TKAs. This study aims to review recent evidences around the kinematics of bicruciate retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

A search of the literature was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science. Reports that assessed the BCR TKA kinematics, including both in vitro cadaveric studies and in vivo clinical studies, were reviewed.

A total number of 169 entries were obtained. By exclusion criteria, five in vitro studies using cadaveric knee specimens and six in vivo studies using patient cohorts were retained. In vitro studies showed a low internal rotation (< 10°) throughout the flexion path in all BCR TKAs. Compared to native knees, the difference in the internal rotation was maximal during early and late flexion; the femur in the BCR TKA was significantly more anteriorly positioned (1.7-3.6 mm from 0° to 110°) and more externally rotated (3.6°-4.2° at 110° and 120°). In vivo studies revealed that the native knee kinematics, in general, were not fully restored after BCR TKA during various knee activates (squatting, level-walking, and downhill-walking). There are asymmetric kinematics during the stance phase of gait cycle and a smaller range of axial rotation (23% patients exhibiting external tibial rotation) throughout the gait cycle in BCR TKAs.

Critical insights in the complex BCR TKA biomechanics have been reported from recent laboratory kinematics studies. However, whether contemporary BCR TKAs can fully restore native knee kinematics remains debatable, warranting further investigations.

The aim of this study was to provide a short term comparison in radiological and clinical outcome between Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR)- and Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).

The cohort consists of 122 patients undergoing a TKA with PSI, equally distributed over the BCR- and CR-TKA group. Perioperative conditions were observed and radiological images were analysed pre-, 6-weeks, and 1-year postoperative to quantify alignment differences between BCR- and CR-TKA. Preoperatively predicted templates were compared with the implanted size to determine predictive value. In addition mean range of motion and revision rates were determined in both groups.

No significant difference was observed in amount of outliers in component alignment between BCR- and CR-TKA. Outliers of the Hip-Knee-Ankle-Axis (HKA-axis) occurred significantly more frequent (P = 0.009) in the BCR-group (37.7%) compared to CR-TKA (18.0%). No clinically relevant differences regarding the predictive sizing of implant components was obtained. No significant differences were observed in revision rates (P = 1.000) and ROM (p = 0.425) between the BCR-groep and CR-group at 2-years FU.

This study illustrates that although the HKA-axis was not fully restored, bi-cruciate retaining surgical technique for BCR-TKA is safe and effective with comparable radiological and clinical outcome as CR TKA. Randomized controlled trials with longer follow up on the HKA-axis alignment and clinical parameters are needed to confirm the presented results and should focus on possible cut off values concerning leg axis in order to define in what patients a BCR-TKA can safely be used.

Retrospective Case Controlled Study.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to have good long-term outcomes and survivorship. Nonetheless, dissatisfied patients are frequently reported in the literature. Bi-cruciate retaining total knee prostheses (BCR TKA) were designed to address the demand for more kinematically functional implants that better reconstruct natural knee kinematics. In BCR TKA, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is preserved. Improved patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction levels are expected. This review aimed to summarize indications for and clinical outcomes of BCR TKA. A systematic literature review on BCR TKA was performed. 24 articles were included for data analysis. Indications covered osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis and others. The degree of deformity was often but not always limited to minor axial deformity and contractures: maximum acceptable varus/valgus deformity reached 10°-30° and flexion contractures of 15°-65°. ACL intactness was macroscopically examined intraoperatively in nine studies and clinically tested in ten studies (e.g., Lachmann Test, drawer-test). Objective and patient-reported outcome scores were reported for follow-up periods of up to 22 years. Survival rates varied significantly. For first generation implants, 22-year survival reached 82% while a second generation design was associated with 13.5% revision rate at 18 months. Reasons for varying outcomes were not clear and may be attributed to the implant itself, surgical techniques and patient specific variables including changed expectations and functional demand. The literature has not shown clear indications and guidelines for the use of BCR implants. The promising results of first generation BCR TKA designs may be optimized through improved implant designs in the future. Further studies are advocated to provide the necessary evidence of second generation BCR TKA designs.

Soft tissue balancing in bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenge that must be overcome to achieve excellent clinical outcomes. However, the optimal degree of joint laxity has yet to be clarified. This cadaveric study sought to examine joint laxity after BCR TKA using a navigation system.

Knee joint laxity was quantified using an image-free navigation system in 8 intact fresh frozen cadavers under three conditions: the native knee, BCR TKA knee, and BCR TKA knee after anterior cruciate ligament resection. Rotational kinematics in the BCR TKA knee during flexion were compared according to whether joint laxity was increased or decreased.

Knee joint laxity after BCR TKA under varus-valgus movement, anterior translation, and internal-external rotation loadings was similar to that of the native knee. However, lateral joint laxity was decreased during flexion in some cases. BCR TKA-treated knees with decreased lateral joint laxity at 90° of flexion demonstrated more limited tibial internal rotation in deep flexion than the native knee (p < 0.05). The loss of internal rotation in deep flexion was partly recovered by using a lateral insert with a posterior slope of +3°.

Restoring optimal joint laxity was not always straightforward in BCR TKA if the 4 ligaments were preserved. Lateral joint laxity was potentially decreased in BCR TKA and may result in kinematic conflict during flexion. Surgeons should be aware of the need to achieve sufficient lateral joint laxity in this type of BCR TKA.