The shoulder is the joint most often affected by dislocations. It is known that bony defects of the glenoid and/or humerus can lead to recurrent dislocations even after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. To prevent recurrent instability, it appears reasonable to reduce fresh and larger Hill-Sachs lesions (off-track lesions). In spine surgery, balloon kyphoplasty is widely used for fracture reduction. The aim of this study was to determine whether the balloon dilatation procedure is transferable to the humeral head and under which conditions it can be successful.

In this biomechanical proof-of-concept study, a preformed "impression stamp" was used to create standardized Hill-Sachs impressions (Calandra grade III lesion) on 13 human humeral specimens. A kyphoplasty balloon was then placed intraosseously and close to the defect using a special monolateral trocar and the defect was reduced by balloon dilatation. Computed tomography imaging was performed on the native specimens, after defect placement and after reduction. Both the defect size and the extent of reduction were measured radiologically, as well as the bone density. Also, the pressure and volume necessary for reduction were measured.

Thirteen proximal humerus specimens were examined. The mean age of the 7 body donors (3 female) was 85 years (standard deviation [SD] ±8.1). The average bone density was 49.0 mg/ml (SD ±26.9) and therefore defined as osteoporotic. The average defect depth (difference to native, measured from a best-fit circle) was 4.1 mm (SD ±1.4), corresponding to an average defect volume of 1203 mm³ (SD ±949). After balloon dilatation, the average achieved reduction (difference to the defect) was 4.3 mm (SD ±1.9) or 1223 mm³ (SD ±1059). This results in an average difference from native to reduced of -0.2 mm (SD ±0.5) or 20 mm³ (SD ±212) and represents no significant difference compared to baseline values (P = .90 or P = .75, respective), but a slight over-reduction in the volumetric measurements. In all humeral specimens, a reduction of at least 2.6 mm or 221 mm³ compared to the defect situation was achieved. An average volume of 3.4 ml (SD ±1.1) and pressure of 271 psi (SD ±81) were required for reduction.

The present results demonstrate that minimally invasive balloon reposition of large acute Hill-Sachs lesions appears methodologically feasible. The required pressure for reduction seems to be higher compared to previous studies. Further studies are necessary for the development of this technique and its reproducible translation into clinical practice.

To evaluate image quality and lesion conspicuity of zero echo time (ZTE) MRI reconstructed with deep learning (DL)-based algorithm versus conventional reconstruction and to assess DL ZTE performance against CT for bone loss measurements in shoulder instability.

Forty-four patients (9 females; 33.5 ± 15.65 years) with symptomatic anterior glenohumeral instability and no previous shoulder surgery underwent ZTE MRI and CT on the same day. ZTE images were reconstructed with conventional and DL methods and post-processed for CT-like contrast. Two musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction method, independently evaluated 20 randomized MR ZTE datasets with and without DL-enhancement for perceived signal-to-noise ratio, resolution, and lesion conspicuity at humerus and glenoid using a 4-point Likert scale. Inter-reader reliability was assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa (K). An ordinal logistic regression model analyzed Likert scores, with the reconstruction method (DL-enhanced vs. conventional) as the predictor. Glenoid track (GT) and Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) measurements were performed by another radiologist on both DL ZTE and CT datasets. Intermodal agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis.

DL ZTE MR bone images scored higher than conventional ZTE across all items, with significantly improved perceived resolution (odds ratio (OR) = 7.67, p = 0.01) and glenoid lesion conspicuity (OR = 25.12, p = 0.01), with substantial inter-rater agreement (K = 0.61 (0.38-0.83) to 0.77 (0.58-0.95)). Inter-modality assessment showed almost perfect agreement between DL ZTE MR and CT for all bone measurements (overall ICC = 0.99 (0.97-0.99)), with mean differences of 0.08 (- 0.80 to 0.96) mm for GT and - 0.07 (- 1.24 to 1.10) mm for HSI.

DL-based reconstruction enhances ZTE MRI quality for glenohumeral assessment, offering osseous evaluation and quantification equivalent to gold-standard CT, potentially simplifying preoperative workflow, and reducing CT radiation exposure.

Eden-Hybinette procedure can maximize the restoration of the glenoid defect by harvesting a proper size of iliac bone block. We developed an arthroscopic "double-inlay" Eden-Hybinette procedure to achieve better bone union of the graft. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of the arthroscopic "double-inlay" Eden-Hybinette procedure for bone defects exceeding 20%.

A retrospective case series was conducted. The inclusion criterion was a bone defect exceeding 20%, especially failed Bristow-Latarjet procedure or recurrent anterior shoulder instability among patients with epilepsy. An arthroscopic "double-inlay" Eden-Hybinette procedure was carried out. Recurrence and apprehension, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California at Los Angeles, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe, and visual analog scale pain scores and rate of return to sports were obtained at final follow-up. Graft position, healing, and resorption were evaluated via 3D computerized tomography scan. Moreover, postoperative complications and the incidence of osteoarthritis were recorded.

The study cohort included 15 patients, with a mean age of 34.9 ± 13.2 years (range, 19-59 years) and a mean follow-up duration of 5 ± 1.7 years (range, 2.0-8.0 years). No patients experienced recurrent dislocation, and the visual analog scale pain and instability scores during shoulder range of motion decreased from a mean 6.5 ± 2.3 and 9.6 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 1 and 2 ± 1.7 at the last follow-up (P < .001). The Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California at Los Angeles, and Subjective Shoulder Value scores of the patients increased from 18.7 ± 10.6, 71.8 ± 5, 22.9 ± 3.5, and 49.3 ± 16.2 preoperatively to 90.3 ± 6.2, 90.1 ± 4.2, 30.1 ± 2.4 (P < .001) and 81.1 ± 15.7 (P = .001) postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the bone graft healing rate was 100%, and there was no severe bone resorption. All patients returned to work, and 73.3% of patients (11 of 15) returned to sports at their preinjury or higher level.

The arthroscopic "double-inlay" Eden-Hybinette procedure has demonstrated reliability and efficacy, yielding excellent mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes for bone defects exceeding 20%, particularly in cases of failed Bristow-Latarjet procedures or in patients with epilepsy.

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the clinical and biomechanical results of distal tibial allograft (DTA) for shoulder instability.

A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical and biomechanical studies reporting DTA for shoulder instability were included. Qualitative and quantitative data were evaluated.

A total of nine clinical and seven biomechanical studies were included. A total of 341 patients with average age from 25.5 to 31 were included in the clinical analysis. Cohorts ranged from 61.9% to 100% male and average glenoid bone loss ranged from 20% to 33%. The recurrent dislocation rate following DTA ranged from 0% to 2.0%. Preoperative mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores ranged from 32.2 to 50, while postoperative scores ranged from 85 to 91. Preoperative mean American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) scores ranged from 40 to 63, while postoperative scores ranged from 90.5 to 92. Postoperative forward flexion ranged from 156.8° to 177°. Union rate on post-operative CT scan was 90.3% to 100%, with significant reportion (over 50%) ranging from 8.1-16%. Biomechanical studies demonstrated that the DTA resulted in improved contact pressures, contact areas, and stability when compared to those with simulated glenoid bone loss.

The literature on DTA for the management of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone-loss shows overall excellent results with low rates of recurrent instability, and high patient reported outcomes. Biomechanical studies demonstrate that glenoid reconstruction with DTA provides near anatomic reconstruction leading to increased stability, improved contact area, and decreased loading pressures.

The findings of the biomechanical review demonstrate that DTA provides highly congruent grafts for glenoid reconstruction. This is important for short term outcomes including re-dislocations and PRO's, as well as longer term outcomes including osteoarthritis. Our review of Level III and IV clinical studies shows the clinical implications with low rates of recurrent instability and high patient reported outcomes.

While risk factors for recurrent instability (RI) after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) for anterior glenohumeral instability (aGHI) have been well established in adult populations, there is much less evidence in pediatric and adolescent patients, despite being the most affected epidemiologic subpopulation.

To identify the clinical, demographic, radiologic, and operative risk factors for RI after ABR for aGHI in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Ovid [MEDLINE]) were searched from data inception to July 5, 2023, using the terms "pediatric,""shoulder instability," and "Bankart repair," allowing data on patients with age up to 19 years. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool was used to assess the quality of included studies.

Eleven studies met the criteria, with 767 patients (770 shoulders) with a mean age of 16.4 years (range, 12-19; 18% female). The pooled RI rate was 28%, and the revision aGHI surgery rate was 20%. The following risk factors were identified for RI after ABR, in descending order of frequency of identification, in terms of number of studies: younger age and greater glenoid bone loss, as well as the presence and/or greater size of a Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) (2 studies each), followed by off-track HSL, >1 dislocation before index surgery, overhead and/or contact sports participation, larger anterior labral tear size, loss of glenoid retroversion, greater number of anchors used, lower postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), nonunion after bony Bankart repair, and absence of concomitant remplissage (1 study each).

In pediatric and adolescent patients with aGHI, the most common risk factors identified for RI after ABR were younger age, greater glenoid bone loss, and the presence and greater size of an HSL. Other risk factors included >1 dislocation before index surgery, participation in overhead and/or contact sports, larger anterior labral tear size, loss of glenoid retroversion, greater number of anchors used, lower postoperative PROs, nonunion after bony Bankart repair, and absence of concomitant remplissage.

Chronic and recurrent shoulder dislocations prior to stabilization can increase the risk of glenoid bone loss. Glenoid bone loss exceeding critical levels can lead to further instability and decreased outcomes following arthroscopic labral repair. Indicators of low socioeconomic status (SES), such as high Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and noncommercial insurance, are related to generalized delays to orthopedic care, which can cause recurrent instability and increase glenoid bone loss.

Higher national ADI and noncommercial insurance would be associated with greater levels of radiographic glenoid bone loss after glenoid instability.

A retrospective study was performed with patients who underwent anterior labral repair. Chart review included demographics, course of care data, preoperative instability data, national ADI, and insurance status. The Neighborhood Atlas Website and patients' home addresses were used to obtain national ADI. Glenoid bone loss was measured using the best-fit circle Pico method on three-dimensionally aligned magnetic resonance images. Researchers were blinded to SES indicators during radiographic analysis. Glenoid bone loss was compared between SES indicators using one-way analysis of variance.

One hundred forty-six patients met inclusion criteria and had complete datasets (23.3% female; 22.4 ± 7.0-year-old; national ADI = 16.1 ± 15.3). Patients experienced on average 9.12 ± 6.63% glenoid bone loss. A curve fitting tool determined a quadratic nonlinear regression best characterized the association of glenoid bone loss and ADI (R2 = 0.392, P < .001). Individuals with commercial insurance experienced 8.58% ± 6.69% glenoid bone loss as compared to 11.78% ± 6.30% in individuals with Medicaid insurance (P = .03). Critical bone loss at a threshold of 13.5% was more likely with higher national ADI (P < .001) and Medicaid insurance (OR = 2.49, CI = 1.02-6.09). However, only national ADI was predictive of subcritical bone loss at a threshold of 10% (P < .001).

Patients with greater national ADI and Medicaid insurance status had greater rates of critical preoperative glenoid bone loss at a threshold of 13.5%. Greater national ADI is also predictive of subcritical glenoid bone loss at a threshold of 10% and overall glenoid bone loss. Further study is needed to assess the postoperative implications of these findings in this population.

The Latarjet procedure, including coracoid transfer, is indicated for anterior glenohumeral instability and significant bone loss. However, even in experienced hands, the Latarjet procedure is associated with potential complications including neurovascular injury, graft resorption leading to painful or broken hardware and secondary subscapularis damage, prominent hardware, and graft nonunion. An adjustable suture button technique may minimize hardware complications and show low rates of nonunion and resorption. (Perhaps, overly rigid fixation of the coracoid using screws contributes to the resorption.) Coracoid transfer may be avoided using various graft sources including iliac crest bone graft. Despite loss of the "sling effect" provided by coracoid and conjoined tendon transfer, the procedure shows good outcomes with low recurrent instability rates in indicated patients. Although technically complex, bone grafting and suspensory fixation may be performed arthroscopically. Time will tell if this technique may supersede the Latarjet procedure.

Remplissage is a useful adjunct to repair of the anteroinferior glenoid labrum in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. This study aimed to compare costs and clinical outcomes between isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and ABR with remplissage.

This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability between June 2011 and August 2021. Patient, procedural factors, and clinical outcome data were collected. Financial data was reported as "relative costs". The best fit circle method was utilized on MRI to estimate glenoid bone loss (GBL) and the Hill Sachs Interval (HSI). Using the glenoid track, patients were determined to either have 'on' or 'off' track lesion.

48 patients who underwent ABR alone and 49 patients who underwent ABR with remplissage were matched and included in analysis. There was no significant difference in total cost, mean number of dislocations, ED visits, or revision surgery between isolated ABR and ABR with remplissage. The remplissage cohort had a significantly higher rate of "off-track" lesions (24.5% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.013), % GBL (8.7% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.015) and Hill Sachs lesion size (16.7 ± 4.1 mm vs. 8.9 ± 6.9 mm, p < 0.001).

No differences in total cost were found between ABR with or without addition of remplissage. Clinical outcomes were similar in both groups, despite a significant increase in the number of off-track lesions, HSI and GBL seen in the remplissage group. Surgeons may consider addition of remplissage in the appropriate clinical context with low concern of increased cost.

Level 3.

Treatment of anterior shoulder instability (ASI) is complex with many factors contributing to surgical decision making. The remplissage is an adjunct surgical technique that can be added at the time of arthroscopic labral repair or glenoid bone block reconstruction to decrease the recurrence rate of ASI post-operatively. The purpose of this review is to highlight the history, indications, and outcomes of remplissage when used for anterior shoulder instability.

Prior studies have demonstrated that remplissage, when used in addition to an arthroscopic labral repair, can significantly reduce the rate of recurrent instability in patients with both off-track and near-track Hill Sachs lesions. There remains concern that addition of remplissage will negatively affect post-operative range of motion (ROM). However, recent literature suggests no difference observed in ROM when comparing remplissage plus arthroscopic labral repair to arthroscopic labral repair alone. While the addition of a remplissage has promising rates of return to sport, these results are less favorable when a remplissage is performed in an overhead athlete. The remplissage is a powerful surgical tool to utilize in addition to an arthroscopic labral repair or glenoid bone block reconstruction in patients with anterior instability. An understanding of appropriate indications and its influence on post-operative outcomes can assist the surgeon with providing the best possible outcome for each individual patient.

To quantitatively evaluate the effects of initial medial-lateral position of bone block on bone remodeling.

Patients who underwent the modified Eden-Hybinette procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability between May 2017 and July 2022 were included. Follow-up of at least 2 years and computed tomography scans preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at a minimum of 12 months after surgery were necessary for inclusion. The medial-lateral as well as the superior-inferior position of bone block after surgery and diameter, depth, version, and surface area of the glenoid at the 3 time points were measured. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine variables on excessive bone resorption, which was defined as a final glenoid ratio less than 100%. The cutoff value was confirmed using receiver operating characteristic curve.

Excessive bone resorption was detected in 17.7% (11/62) of patients. Medial-lateral position of the bone block, glenoid depth and its increment immediate after surgery differed significantly between patients with and without excessive bone resorption. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that excessive bone resorption was significantly correlated with medial-lateral position of bone block (odds ratio 0.191; P = .002). The cutoff value was -0.5 mm (area under the curve, 0.934; 95% confidence interval 0.870-0.998; P < .001; sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 100%). In total, 81.8% (9/11) of cases with excessive bone resorption were detected with graft surfaces distant from the extrapolated glenoid curvature.

Medial-lateral position of bone block was a critical determinant for bone remodeling after glenoid reconstruction and excessive bone resorption was associated with too medially placed graft. To achieve a more stable glenohumeral joint with physiologically pear-shaped glenoid surface after remodeling, the graft placing at no more than 0.5 mm medial to bony surface of the glenoid as well as with a well-matched articular surface to the extrapolated glenoid curvature was proved to be preferred.

Level IV, retrospective case series.

To evaluate the functional outcomes of arthroscopic onlay dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) using the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon for treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability (AGI) with limited to subcritical glenoid bone loss (GBL).

Twenty-five patients underwent arthroscopic DAS using LHB tendon between March 2022 and October 2022 for treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability (AGI) with limited to subcritical glenoid bone loss (GBL) were included in a prospective study with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. The shoulder functional outcomes were assessed using the Rowe and the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH) scores both preoperative and at 2 years follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done 6 months after surgery to evaluate LHB tendon healing to the anterior glenoid.

The study included 25 patients complaining of recurrent AGI. Twenty-one patients were males and four patients were females. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 22.75 ± 3.24 years. The mean duration between the first shoulder dislocation episode and surgery was 5.5 ± 2.13 months. The right shoulder was injured in 15 patients while the left shoulder was involved in 10 patients. The mean follow-up period was 24.25 ± 0.82 months. DAS using the long head of the biceps tendon resulted in a statistically significant improvement of the mean Rowe and the Quick DASH scores between preoperative and 2 years postoperative. Recurrent dislocation was reported in two (8%) patients during the follow-up period.

Arthroscopic onlay dynamic anterior stabilization using the long head of the biceps tendon is a safe and effective method for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with GBL up to 25%.

Level IV, case series study.

To evaluate the preferences of shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery to treat rotator cuff injuries, glenohumeral instability, and acromioclavicular dislocations considering a current and an ideal scenarios.

A nationwide survey included 314 specialists who answered a 20-question questionnaire on treating shoulder pathologies.

This study included 314 specialists. Most (96%) perform rotator cuff repair arthroscopically and 74% use metallic anchors as a fixation method. In open surgery, most specialists reported using anchors (75%) instead of transosseous sutures. In treating glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic Bankart repair, 86% used three or more fixation anchors and 87%, bioabsorbable anchors. In Latarjet cases, 57% used cannulated screws. In treating acute acromioclavicular dislocations, 88% used the open route. Regarding fixation, 70% chose high-resistance wires; 65%, anchors; and 61%, Kirschner wires.

The current Brazilian scenario has limited availability of ideal instruments and materials so specialists can treat shoulder pathologies. However, specialists' preferences agree with the latest medical literature. Level of evidence V, Expert opinion.

Glenoid bone loss (GBL) calculation in patients with shoulder instability has a wide variability in methods and their reliability. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate a new semi-automated software developed to improve GBL calculation using a 3D imaging modeling (IODA-shoulder) and to compare the method to the PICO area method.

A semi-automated software to assess GBL was preliminarily developed and validated on 7 fresh frozen specimens (scapulae with artificially created glenoid defect), using water displacement method. Afterwards, the software was retrospectively used on CT images of 20 patients affected by recurrent shoulder dislocation. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral dislocation, minimum 2 dislocation episodes. Exclusion criteria were bone reconstruction of the glenoid, failed shoulder stabilization, bilateral dislocation, shoulder arthritis. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of bilateral shoulder were retrieved for each patient. Two methods to determine GBL were compared. The PICO surface area method and the new IODA method. We assessed the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the two methods with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Bland-Alman analysis, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

We did not find a statistically significant difference between the mean volumes calculated with PICO and IODA methods, respectively 914 vs. 815 mm3, p=0.155. The analysis carried out by using the traditional PICO method showed a lower concordance rate among four observers than the higher concordance found using IODA method, regardless of the size and the location of the defect. The ICC agreement with PICO was significantly lower than with IODA (0.76 vs. 0.97). We found a poor CCC with PICO (from 0.65 to 0.81) and a substantial one with IODA (from 0.96 to 0.98).

The intra- and inter-rater reliability using IODA method is significantly better than PICO method. The assessment of GBL using IODA method is time saving, avoiding significant inter- and intra-observer variation, mainly due to individual skill and experience in the method.

IV, experimental study.

No biomechanical study has established the effect of different graft positions or bone block options on anterior glenohumeral joint stability.

The purpose of this study was to compare graft choice (distal clavicular vs coracoid autograft for Latarjet) and position on stability of the bone block for anterior glenohumeral instability. It was hypothesized that both grafts would be comparable if flush with the glenoid but that the sling effect of the Latarjet procedure would lead to greater stability in case of graft medialization.

Controlled laboratory study.

Eight cadaveric shoulders were included. Defects stabilized using a distal clavicular graft and a coracoid graft were consecutively positioned at 0, 4, and 8 mm medially. The starting position was determined by the humeral head's being seated at its most medial position on the glenoid surface. Each experiment comprised maximal external rotation and glenohumeral abduction at 60° while applying a constant 50-N medial compressive force to the humerus under all conditions. The conjoint tendon was routed through a split in the subscapularis and loaded with a 5-N weight using a pulley system for all Latarjet trials to simulate the sling effect.

Regarding the clavicular graft, the stability ratio significantly decreased versus the intact condition at all medial offsets (P = .007 for 0 mm, P < .001 for 4 mm, and P < .001 for 8 mm), and it was significantly lower in the 4-mm versus 0-mm position (P = .008), significantly higher in the 4-mm versus 8-mm position (P < .001), and significantly lower in the 8-mm versus 0-mm position (P < .001). Regarding the coracoid graft, the stability ratio was comparable with intact for the 0-mm position (P = .12), while it was significantly lower in the 4-mm and 8-mm positions (P < .001 for both). The distal clavicular graft at 0-mm offset was comparable with the coracoid graft at 0-mm offset.

In shoulders with anterior glenoid bone loss, the coracoid and distal clavicular autografts were biomechanically comparable when placed flush with the glenoid. The distal clavicle at 0-mm offset did not restore stability compared with the intact specimen, but the Latarjet at 0-mm offset was not significantly different from the intact condition.

The Latarjet procedure provides higher stability compared with distal clavicular autograft when medialized.

Arthroscopic remplissage has been suggested as a means to decrease recurrent instability in arthroscopic Bankart repair surgery involving patients with significant Hill-Sachs lesions. Remplissage fills the Hill-Sachs lesion to prevent glenohumeral "engagement" and recurrent instability. Remplissage is not generally indicated in patients with smaller, nonengaging Hill-Sachs lesions. However, a recent review suggests that by expanding the indications to nonengaging Hill-Sachs lesions, recurrence of shoulder instability may be lower in patients having arthroscopic Bankart repair. Further, the review suggests that patients having Bankart plus remplissage did not lose shoulder external rotation range of motion. A concern, in addition to follow-up that likely results in underestimation of recurrence, is that anatomically, remplissage should decrease external rotation, and manual measurement of external rotation could reflect compensatory scapulothoracic motion. This is a particular problem for throwing athletes.

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has undergone significant advancements over the past decades, transitioning from a primarily diagnostic tool to a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Technological innovations and refined surgical techniques have expanded the indications for arthroscopy, allowing minimally invasive management of shoulder instability and rotator cuff pathology. Methods: This narrative review explores the historical evolution, current trends, and future perspectives in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Results: Key advancements in shoulder instability management include the evolution of the arthroscopic Bankart repair, the introduction of the remplissage technique for Hill-Sachs lesions, and the development of arthroscopic Latarjet procedures. Additionally, novel techniques such as Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) and bone block procedures have emerged as promising solutions for complex instability cases. In rotator cuff repair, innovations such as the suture-bridge double-row technique, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and biological augmentation strategies, including dermal allografts and bioinductive patches, have contributed to improving tendon healing and functional outcomes. The role of biologic augmentation, including biceps tendon autografts and subacromial bursa augmentation, is also gaining traction in enhancing repair durability. Conclusions: As arthroscopic techniques continue to evolve, the integration of biologic solutions and patient-specific surgical planning will likely define the future of shoulder surgery. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of current state-of-the-art techniques and discusses their clinical implications, with a focus on optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing surgical failure rates.

Remplissage with Bankart repair (RMBR) is an arthroscopic procedure performed on <25% of Bankart lesions with off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) that alters the insertion of the infraspinatus muscle into the humeral head. However, the effects of RMBR surgery on humeral head displacement due to changes in biomechanics and kinematics have not been fully elucidated.

To evaluate how the biomechanical and kinematic effects of the post-RMBR glenohumeral joint influence humeral head displacement using the finite element analysis (FEA) method.

Controlled laboratory study.

Biomechanical and kinematic experiments were performed on 24 established finite element (FE) models, which included 12 normal glenohumeral joint models and 12 post-RMBR glenohumeral joint models at the abduction and external rotation (ABER) position. FEA was used to compute the total displacement of the humeral head during passive anteroinferior loading and active contraction of the infraspinatus muscle.

Under passive anteroinferior loading, the humeral heads showed less total anterior displacement after RMBR than did normal glenohumeral joints in the ABER position (1.94 ± 0.48 vs 5.19 ± 1.91 mm; P = .003). When the infraspinatus muscle was stimulated to contract, the humeral heads of post-RMBR glenohumeral joints exhibited greater total posterior displacement in the ABER position than did the normal glenohumeral joints (4.22 ± 0.23 vs 2.44 ± 0.56 mm; P < .001).

Displacement of the humeral head is influenced by changes in the insertion of the infraspinatus tendon after RMBR surgery, which consequently affects the lever arm and torque generated by the infraspinatus muscle on the humeral head.

The FEA results confirmed that a change in the insertion of the infraspinatus tendon alters the lever arm and torque produced by the infraspinatus muscle on the humeral head. This leads to changes in the displacement of the humeral head in the ABER position after the RMBR procedure. These findings deepen the understanding of RMBR surgery in clinical practice and can assist physicians in deciding whether to choose this surgical approach in patients with combined HSL.

To compare recurrent instability and return-to-sport rates along with external rotation differences between on-track (nonengaging) Hill-Sachs lesion patients undergoing either an isolated Bankart repair (IBR) or a Bankart repair augmented with a remplissage procedure (B+R).

A search was conducted using 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Only clinical comparative (level of evidence I-III) studies were considered for inclusion. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria.

Six level of evidence III studies, totaling 537 patients (202 B+R and 335 IBR) were included for analysis. All patients had <20% glenoid bone loss and a nonengaging, on-track Hill-Sachs lesion. At a median final follow-up of 34.7 months, recurrent dislocation rates ranged from 0% to 7.7% and 3.5% to 30% in the B+R and IBR groups, respectively. Moreover, subjective instability and revision surgery rates presented lower ranges in the B+R upon comparison with the IBR cohort (0%-32% vs 5%-71.4% and 0%-5% vs 0%-35%, respectively). Furthermore, return to preinjury level of sports ranged from 64% to 100% in the remplissage-augmented group and 50% to 90% in the IBR cohort. Postoperative external rotation at side varied from 50° to 63° in the B+R and 55° to 63° in the IBR arm. Additional subgroup analysis revealed recurrent dislocation rates in athletes and patients with near-track Hill-Sachs lesions undergoing remplissage augmentation to be 0% to 5% and 2% to 47% while ranging from 8.8% to 30% and 9% to 66% for IBR patients, respectively.

Upon qualitative analysis, ranges of recurrent instability measures, including recurrent dislocation rates, are higher in patients undergoing IBR in comparison to B+R. Activity level influences outcomes as athletes were found to have a higher range of recurrent dislocation rates in the IBR group. The addition of remplissage showed a higher range of return-to-sport rates with comparable postoperative external rotation between groups.

Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.

The identification of critical Hill Sachs lesions prone to engagement with the anterior glenoid rim is decisive for treatment decision making in anterior shoulder instability patients. Untreated critical Hill Sachs lesions can lead to recurrence of instability after surgical stabilization procedures. The glenoid track concept is currently used to quantify the likelihood of engagement of a Hill Sachs lesion but heavily relies on the difficult identification of the rotator cuff insertion and does not account for the laxity of the patient. Accordingly, studies have not been able to consistently confirm its accuracy in predicting recurrence of instability. The global track concept potentially allows for three-dimensional (3D) determination of the minimum rotation of the humeral head which in the worst arm position with alignment of the defects may lead to engagement of bipolar defects independent of rotator cuff insertion and laxity. Further validation steps and clinical studies to define critical values in different patient subpopulations are necessary before application in clinical practice.

Glenoid bone defects play a significant role in anterior shoulder instability. Their management is controversial, and the use of anterior bone grafting is one appealing option. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes at a 5-year follow-up of an arthroscopic bone block procedure with iliac crest allograft for the management of subcritical glenoid bone loss in subjects with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Prospective longitudinal study of a consecutive case series of subjects with anterior glenohumeral instability and subcritical (between 8% and 17%) glenoid bone defects managed with an arthroscopic bone block procedure with iliac crest allograft fixed with a double-button system associated with a Bankart repair and, when necessary, a remplissage. Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans were used to quantify the dimensions of the glenoid and the humeral bone defects. Postoperative CT scans 1 month after surgery and at 1-year follow-up were used to assess the graft's positioning, integration, and resorption. Clinical assessment was performed using the Constant-Murley (CS) and Rowe (RS) scores preoperatively and at a minimum 3-year follow-up.

Fourteen subjects were included (all male, median age 27 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 5.75), with a median of 8 (IQR = 14) dislocation episodes before surgery and a median preoperative glenoid bone defect of 13% (IQR = 14%, range: 9.3%-15.4%). A remplissage was added in 12 of 14 cases (85.7%). Graft position was excellent in all cases (100%) in the axial plane and in 12 of 14 (85.7%) in the sagittal plane. The median reconstructed glenoid surface in the postoperative CT scan was 99.4% (IQR 2.1%, range: 96.6%-100%). One-year postoperative CT scans showed bone resorption of ≥20% of volume in 13 of 14 cases (93%), with a median resorption of 80.3% (IQR = 40.8%) of the graft volume. Graft integration was observed in 6 of 14 cases (42.8%). The median reconstructed glenoid surface decreased to 93.6% (IQR = 2%, range: 87.5%-97.3%) (P < .0001). At the latest follow-up (58.9 months [IQR = 11.2]: range: 39.6-67.8), 2 subjects (14.3%) presented with recurrence of instability. There were substantial improvements in the RS (from 25 [5] to 95 [6.2], P < .0001) and in the CS (from 84 [5] to 94.5 [4.2] points, P < .0001) at the final follow-up.

Arthroscopic bone block procedure employing an iliac crest allograft achieves accurate graft positioning and good clinical outcomes with low recurrence rates at a mean of 5-year follow-up. However, early graft resorption and low consolidation rates are worrisome issues that must be considered.

Anterior glenoid bone defects significantly influence surgical outcomes in shoulder instability cases. Various measurement methods based on 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) have been developed. Recently, the simple linear formula method, which establishes a correlation between glenoid height and width, has emerged as a promising technique.

This study aimed to assess the differences in glenoid morphology between patients with anterior shoulder instability and healthy controls within a specific East Asian population (Han Chinese). The objectives included establishing linear formulas specific to both groups and comparing the efficacy of the simple linear formula method with traditional methods for measuring glenoid defects using 3D-CT.

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

3D-CT images of both the affected and unaffected shoulders of patients with anterior shoulder instability, as well as one shoulder of healthy controls, were analyzed. Glenoid height and width were measured, and linear formulas were established for this specific Han Chinese population. P values were determined using linear regression analysis to assess the statistical significance of the relationship between glenoid height (H) and width (W). A P value <.05 indicated a statistically significant relationship. R2 values were calculated to determine the strength of the relationship, with higher values (closer to 1) indicating a stronger correlation. The glenoid defect ratio was calculated using the simple linear formula method and compared with traditional methods: the Griffith, linear-based best-fit circle, and area-based best-fit circle methods. Interrater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

There were 206 patients in the patient group and 206 participants in the healthy control group. In the patient group, the mean glenoid height and width of the unaffected shoulders were 35.21 ± 3.39 and 24.26 ± 2.74 mm, respectively (formula: W = 0.75H - 2.12; R2 = 0.86; P < .001). In the male patient subgroup, they were 37.57 ± 1.35 and 26.23 ± 0.91 mm, respectively (formula: W = 0.47H + 8.60; R2 = 0.79; P < .001). In the female patient subgroup, they were 31.63 ± 2.21 and 21.26 ± 1.65 mm, respectively (formula: W = 0.52H + 4.78; R2 = 0.74; P < .001). In the healthy control group, the mean glenoid height and width were 33.48 ± 3.32 and 24.18 ± 3.02 mm, respectively (formula: W = 0.86H - 4.58; R2 = 0.89; P < .001). In the male healthy control subgroup, they were 36.43 ± 1.35 and 26.89 ± 1.17 mm, respectively (formula: W = 0.67H + 2.63; R2 = 0.58; P < .001). In the female healthy control subgroup, they were 30.54 ± 1.70 and 21.47 ± 1.49 mm, respectively (formula: W = 0.61H + 2.90; R2 = 0.69; P < .001). The actual glenoid defect in the entire patient cohort averaged 12.3% ± 5.9%. The simple linear formula method demonstrated an ICC of 0.82, with a glenoid defect ratio averaging 15.7% ± 6.9%. The Griffith method had an ICC of 0.85, yielding a glenoid defect ratio of 16.5% ± 5.8%. The linear-based and area-based best-fit circle methods had ICCs of 0.73 and 0.77, respectively, with glenoid defect ratios of 16.9% ± 6.0% and 13.1% ± 6.2%, respectively.

Glenoid morphology in patients with anterior shoulder instability, particularly among male patients, was characterized by elongation and narrowing compared with healthy participants. The simple linear formula method demonstrated excellent reliability and accuracy, comparable with traditional methods, offering an efficient approach to measuring glenoid defects. Further validation across diverse populations is warranted.

The Bankart and the Latarjet procedures are 2 of the most commonly utilized surgical techniques to treat anterior shoulder instability. However, the long-term outcomes after these procedures remain unclear, and there is not enough information regarding arthroscopic Latarjet.

To analyze long-term outcomes of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability managed with an arthroscopic Bankart or Latarjet procedure.

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Patients who underwent an arthroscopic Latarjet were matched-paired in a 1:1 ratio with patients who underwent an arthroscopic Bankart procedure at a single institution between 2007 and 2012. Recurrence at the time of follow-up as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Postoperative status was assessed at the final follow-up using the Rowe score, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), the Subjective Shoulder Value, and the return-to-sport rate.

A total of 80 patients, 40 patients in each group, were included (overall mean age, 26.5 ± 15.4 years). The mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range, 10-17 years). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the Bankart group compared with the Latarjet group (35% vs 10%, respectively; P = .009). The mean estimate for the cumulative proportion of stable shoulders at 15-year follow-up was 64.4% in the Bankart group and 89.6% in the Latarjet group (P = .008). Revision surgery because of instability was necessary in 8 (20%) patients in the Bankart group and 2 (5%) in the Latarjet group (P = .41). There was no significant group difference in complication rate (15% in the Bankart group vs 17.5% in the Latarjet group; P = .48). The WOSI score was significantly better in patients treated with arthroscopic Latarjet (P = .004). More than half of the patients were able to completely return to their previous sport (52.5%), with no significant difference between groups.

Arthroscopic Latarjet was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate and better postoperative WOSI score and sports activity level at long-term follow-up compared with arthroscopic Bankart, without any greater risk of complications.

Anterior shoulder dislocation is a prevalent clinical issue, with high recurrence rates after initial dislocation. Stability of the shoulder joint is maintained by the interplay of static and dynamic stabilizers, including the glenoid and humeral head morphology. Glenoid morphology has been identified as particularly influential in joint stability, and thus the evaluation of glenoid bone loss is crucial in managing shoulder dislocations. This study aimed to investigate the differences in glenoid morphologies between on-track and off-track lesions postdislocation.

This retrospective case-control study included patients who presented with shoulder dislocation at a level 1 trauma center from 2011 to 2020. Patients with anterior shoulder dislocation, complete computed tomography imaging, visible bone loss, and those aged 18 years or more were included. Radiographic parameters were assessed using a certified picture achieving and communication system workstation. The groups were divided into on-track or off-track lesions and their glenoid version, glenoid concavity, and the morphometrical-based bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) were compared.

Two hundred twelve patients (70% male and mean age of 50 years) were included and no significant difference was found between the on-track and off-track groups in terms of demographics or injury mechanism. Significant differences were noted in the glenoid defect (1.28 mm vs. 4.67 mm, P = .001), glenoid concavity/depth (1.7 mm vs. 1.3 mm, P = .001), the BSSR (40% vs. 33%, P = .001), and glenoid retroversion (4.4 vs. 2.9°, P = .009).

Glenoid morphology has become an increasing focus in the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocation. Patients with an off-track lesion appear to have not only greater glenoid loss and a larger Hill-Sachs but also a flatter glenoid with less retroversion. This also appears to lead to a lower BSSR.

The hypothesis is that the scapula spine can provide a graft of suitable dimensions for use in cases of shoulder instability with critical bone loss. We aimed to investigate its utility with grafts of differing sizes.

The scapula spine was measured on computed tomography scans of 50 patients who had undergone anterior stabilization. The theoretical ability to harvest a graft of either 2 × 1 × 1 cm or 2 × 0.8 × 0.8 cm was analyzed.

Using the 2 × 1 × 1 cm threshold, 36% of the scapulae had at least 1 zone from which a suitable graft could be obtained. 61% had only 1 zone from which a suitable graft could be obtained. Using the 2 × 0.8 × 0.8 cm threshold, 72% had at least 1 zone from which a graft could be obtained. A total of 47% met the threshold in 1 zone only.

The scapula spine can be used as a source of autograft. Grafts up to 2 x 1 × 1 cm can be harvested in some individuals; however, the anatomy is very variable.

Anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone lesion can be treated with the Eden-Hybinette procedure utilizing a tricortical iliac crest bone graft or the Latarjet procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics throughout an external shoulder rotation following the Eden-Hybinette and Latarjet procedures. Nine human specimens were examined with dynamic radiostereometry during a GHJ external rotation with anteriorly directed loads from 0 to 30 N. In 30- and 60-degree GHJ abduction, the kinematics (measured as the humeral head center and contact point) was sequentially recorded for a 15% anterior glenoid bone lesion, the Eden-Hybinette, and the Latarjet procedure. The Latarjet and Eden-Hybinette procedures resulted in up to 9.7 mm (95%CI 0.5; 18.8) more posterior and a 7.4 mm (95%CI 0.3; 14.4) superior humeral head center location compared to the glenoid bone lesion. With 0-20 N anterior directed loads, the Latarjet procedure resulted in a more posterior humeral head center and contact point of up to 7.6 mm (95%CI 3.6; 11.5), especially in 60 degrees of GHJ abduction, compared to the Eden-Hybinette procedure. Opposite, at 30 N anterior-directed load, the Eden-Hybinette procedure resulted in a more posterior humeral head center of up to 7.6 mm (95%CI 0.3; 14.9) in 30 degrees GHJ abduction compared to the Latarjet procedure. The results support considering the Latarjet procedures in patients who need the stabilizing effect with the arm in the abducted and externally rotated position (e.g., throwers) and the Eden-Hybinette procedure in patients exposed to high anterior-directed loads with the arm at lower abduction angles (e.g., epilepsia).

Distal tibial allograft (DTA) reconstruction for glenoid bone loss (GBL) has gained popularity. While recent studies have demonstrated that glenoid concavity is an important factor in native glenohumeral stability, there remains a paucity of data regarding concavity restoration during reconstructive procedures for GBL and its biomechanical effect.

To compare the restoration of anterior glenohumeral stability and glenoid concavity after DTA and classic Latarjet procedures.

Controlled laboratory study.

Nine human cadaveric specimens (mean age, 62.2 years; range, 52-69 years) underwent pretesting computed tomography (CT) to assess native glenoid concavity as determined by the glenoid depth and bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). GBL was created so the DTA and Latarjet graft could restore 100% of the native glenoid width. The rotator cuff tendons were loaded, and anterior stability testing was performed using a KUKA robot to apply a controlled anterior force with the shoulder in 90° of abduction and neutral external rotation. A motion capture system recorded humeral head translation. The following conditions were tested: intact, soft tissue Bankart lesion; bone loss model with DTA reconstruction; classic Latarjet procedure without conjoint tendon loaded; and classic Latarjet procedure with conjoint tendon loaded (sling effect). All specimens underwent posttesting CT to measure the BSSR of the DTA and Latarjet reconstructions. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to compare the BSSR and anterior translations between the DTA and Latarjet reconstructions.

DTA produced greater concavity than the Latarjet procedure (BSSR: 0.45 vs 0.35; P < .001). There was no difference in anterior translation between the DTA and Latarjet procedures with the sling effect (5.1 mm vs 4.7 mm; P > .999). However, maximum anterior translation was decreased after the DTA procedure when compared with the Latarjet technique without the sling effect (5.1 mm vs 10.3 mm; P = .045).

DTA produces a more concave reconstruction and decreased anterior translation compared with the flatter reconstruction produced by the classic Latarjet procedure without the sling effect. DTA and the classic Latarjet procedure with conjoint tendon loading, however, yielded equivalent reductions in anterior translation.

Distal tibial allograft reconstruction is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the classic Latarjet due to the restoration of glenoid concavity in addition to glenoid width. Surgeons should consider the role of concavity when addressing glenohumeral instability with bone loss.

Free bone graft transfer (FBGT) and the Latarjet procedure are 2 competing techniques for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. In the current literature, there are no mid- to long-term prospective randomized comparative studies comparing both surgical methods.

This prospective, twin-center, randomized study enrolled 60 patients with anterior shoulder instability and more than 15% glenoid bone loss. The study cohort was randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an open FBGT surgery (J-bone graft technique) or an open Latarjet procedure. Clinical data, including Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI), Rowe Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale, satisfaction with the operation, sports and work limitations, range of motion and strength, as well as the extent of instability arthropathy were collected preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. The 5-year follow-up rate was 63.3% for the FBGT group and 66.6% for the Latarjet group.

The primary outcome parameter (ie, WOSI) showed no significant differences at the 5-year follow-up (J-Span 221 ± 186, Latarjet 201 ± 239; P = .529) and other time points. The secondary clinical scores also showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (Rowe Score, P = .596; Subjective Shoulder Value, P = .368; visual analog scale, P = .238; and Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System, P = .594). Comparable results were observed regarding strength and motion, except for significantly better internal rotation in the FBGT group at all time points, including the 5-year follow-up (P = .004). A single recurrence of instability was observed in 3 patients of the FBGT group and 1 patient of the Latarjet group (P = .342). Postoperative hypesthesia at the iliac crest was reported in 3.3% of the FBGT patients. The degree of instability arthropathy showed a comparable increase in both cohorts (P = .154).

Neither of the 2 surgical methods showed clinical superiority at the 5-year follow-up, except for statistically better internal rotation in the FBGT group. Both cohorts showed comparable success in joint stabilization, but neither could prevent the progression of instability arthropathy.

Treatment algorithms for anterior glenohumeral instability are evolving. Identification of soft tissue injuries remains important because stand-alone labrum and ligament repairs are a mainstay of primary intervention. Increasingly recognized is the importance of bone lesions, particularly the synergistic effects of bipolar bone loss in the glenoid track model. Accordingly, reporting and measurement of bone lesions is crucial to treatment planning, especially in patients with a failed Bankart repair. This review covers (1) anatomy related to anterior shoulder instability, (2) preoperative imaging assessment of soft tissue injuries, (3) postoperative imaging assessment of soft tissue injuries, (4) imaging techniques for soft tissue injuries, (5) preoperative imaging of bone injuries, and (6) postoperative imaging of bone injuries.

Evaluation of glenoid bone loss is critical in preoperative planning, as bone loss >13.5% has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. While 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) and the Pico method have been the gold standard in bone loss evaluation, it is unclear how most orthopaedic surgeons evaluate for bone loss in practice.

To investigate the techniques used by orthopaedic surgeons to measure glenoid bone loss.

Cross-sectional study.

A 12-question survey was sent to members of the AOSSM and Arthroscopy Association of North America. This survey included questions regarding the participants' demographic information, typical surgical practice and volume, and glenoid bone loss identification method. Friedman testing with multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction was used to evaluate the ordinal variable, use frequency, while Kruskal-Wallis testing and Spearman correlations were used to evaluate the role of surgeon demographic factors on method usage.

Overall, 171 orthopaedic surgeons responded to the survey. Participating surgeons were from a variety of locations, practice settings, and years in practice; 91.1% of respondents said that they routinely measure glenoid bone loss. The imaging modality most commonly used for bone loss evaluation was 3D CT, followed by 2-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance imaging, then 2D CT and radiographs. Percentage diameter loss was the most commonly used method of bone loss evaluation. The intraoperative probe length method was used occasionally, the Pico method was used rarely, and the chord length method was never used. There was no significant effect of time in practice or practice location on bone loss methods used. Surgeons in private practice (P = .022) or other settings (P = .015) had a higher frequency of using the intraoperative probe length method compared with those in the military.

Overall, this study highlights the inconsistency in surgeon evaluation of glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability, despite good evidence of its clinical importance, especially in preventing recurrent instability. This lack of consistency may be mitigated with the establishment of best practice guidelines or accepted algorithms for evaluation and assessment of glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability.

Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation is a common shoulder problem, usually caused by a force from the front when the shoulder joint is abducted and externally rotated. In the present study, we investigated the effect of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon on shoulder motion after restoring anterior stability of the joint in patients with 13.5-20% of scapular glenoid defects.

Fifty patients admitted to our department with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation between April 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (groups A and B, n = 25 each) with comparable age, sex, hand dominance, and articular glenoid bone loss. Patients in group A were treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation, whereas those in group B underwent arthroscopic long head of the biceps transposition and subscapularis augmentation. All patients in both groups were followed up for more than 1 year, with a mean follow-up period of 20.1 ± 0.7 months (range, 13-28 months). The primary outcomes were changes in the visual analog scale score, Rowe classification, and Constant-Murley shoulder outcome score.

None of the patients in either group had experienced recurrent dislocation at 1-year follow-up. The visual analog scale scores decreased, and the Rowe and Constant-Murley scores improved significantly compared to the preoperative scores. Significant differences were observed in the forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation angles of the shoulder joint in both groups at 1-year follow-up compared to baseline. The postoperative forward flexion (P = 0.143), abduction (P = 0.778), and internal rotation angles (P = 0.609) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At 1-year follow-up, the loss of angles of external rotation at the side and external rotation at 90° abduction in group B exhibited significantly less angular loss than group A.

Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation using the long head of the biceps transposition technique was effective at restoring anterior stability in patients with 13.5-20% scapular glenoid defects. It was more effective at restoring the external rotational function of the shoulder joint than arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation.

To compare arthroscopic Bankart repair versus the open Latarjet procedure at a minimum of a 10-year follow-up evaluating recurrence and arthropathy development rates.

A systematic review was performed in concordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on the arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet procedure with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Recurrent instability, revisions, and instability arthropathy were evaluated.

Overall, 40 studies met our criteria and were included, with 2,019 shoulders undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and 1,069 undergoing the open Latarjet procedure. The rate of recurrent instability was 0.0% to 22.6% (redislocations: 0.0%-9.6%) in those undergoing an open Latarjet procedure and 13.3% to 82.2% (redislocations: 9.6%-25.7%) among those undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. The rate of total revisions was 0.0% to 17.9% in those undergoing an open Latarjet procedure and 4.8% to 42.9% among those undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. The rate of overall arthritis was 10.3% to 71.4% in those undergoing an open Latarjet procedure and 16.7% to 89.3% among those undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair.

There was a lower recurrent instability rate and revision rate in the open Latarjet group compared to the arthroscopic Bankart group at long-term follow-up. The rates of moderate to severe arthritis were comparable between the 2 procedures.

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

The significant rate of recurrent instability following arthroscopic stabilization surgery points to a need for an evidence-based treatment approach. The instability severity index Score (ISI score) is a point-based algorithm that may be used to assist clinicians in selecting the optimal treatment approach, but its efficacy compared with a traditional treatment algorithm has not been previously validated. The aim was to compare two surgical treatment algorithms: the ISI score and a conventional treatment algorithm (CTA).

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving participants who were randomized to either the ISI score or CTA and were followed for 24 months postrandomization. In the ISI score cohort, patients underwent a Latarjet procedure if they presented with a score >3 points. Those scoring ISI score ≦3 points underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients randomized to the CTA group underwent a Latarjet procedure if the glenoid bone loss was > 25%. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score as well as recurrence rates between groups.

Sixty-three patients were randomized to ISI score (n = 31) or CTA (n = 32). At two years, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score was similar between groups (ISI score: 84.1 ± 16.9, CTA: 85.7 ± 12.5, P = .70). Similarly, no differences were detected in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (ISI score: 93.2 ± 16.2, CTA: 92.6 ± 9.9, P = .89). Apprehension was reported in 18.5% for the ISI score group and 20% in the CTA group (P = 1.00). At a 24-month follow-up, there was no difference in redislocations: one in ISI score group and none in the CTA group (P = .48). There were two revision surgeries in the ISI score group and two in the CTA group.

This study did not demonstrate any differences in functional outcomes, the incidence of apprehension, or failure rates between the two treatment algorithms at 24-month follow-up.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of open traditional Latarjet stabilization using 32-mm-long and 30-mm-long cannulated screws in males and females, respectively, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

We retrospectively reviewed open Latarjet procedures using cannulated screws of standard length with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Functional evaluation was performed with postoperative Rowe and Walch score, visual analog scale for pain and return to sport. Graft healing was assessed with computed tomography scans at 4 to 6 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to postoperative radiographic measurements: a bicortical or unicortical screw group. The α angle between the shaft of the screw and the glenoid subchondral bone was measured for superior and inferior screws. Level of significance was 0.05. The post hoc power analysis was 0.89.

A total of 69 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Of these patients, 60 (87%) were available for final follow-up (n = 62 shoulders), with a mean age of 28.4 ± 9.5 years (range, 16-55 years) at the time of surgery. Fifty six males (93.3%) and 4 females (6.7%) were included. The mean final follow-up period was a mean of 38 months after the procedure (range, 25-48 months). Eight of 60 patients (13.3%) had persistent apprehension in abduction-external rotation position. One patient (1.7%) had a recurrence of shoulder subluxation. The mean Walch-Duplay score was 90 ± 11.6 points (range, 40-100 points), and the mean Rowe score was 93.4 ± 11 points (range, 50-100 points). The mean visual analog scale score for the evaluation of pain was 0.9 ± 1.3 (range, 0-4). The coracoid healed the glenoid neck in 87.1% (54/62) of the shoulders on the postoperative computed tomography scan. Lower alpha angle for inferior and superior screws had more rate of unicortical fixation (P = .05 and P = .04, respectively). Fourteen of 62 (22.6%) shoulders were found unicortical screws. Six bicortical cases and 2 cases of unicortical screws (25%) showed nonunion (P = .86). There were 2 complications, 1 patient had hematoma that required drainage and 1 case had transient axillary nerve palsy which resolved spontaneously. No complications associated with the hardware were found.

Open traditional Latarjet procedure using 32-mm-long and 30-mm-long cannulated screws in males and females, respectively, provided good outcomes with acceptable complication rates. Unicortical screws fixation does not have a higher rate of nonunion than bicortical screws.

While glenoid bone loss (GBL) after anterior shoulder instability correlates with poor functional outcomes, the specific effects of GBL in posterior and combined-type shoulder instability remain poorly characterized, especially in a high-risk military population.

The purpose of this study was to compare GBL between unidirectional anterior or posterior instability versus combined-type instability in active-duty servicemembers. It was hypothesized that total GBL and GBL in the direction of instability would be greater in those with combined-type instability compared with unidirectional instability.

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Active-duty servicemembers who underwent shoulder stabilization surgery between January 2010 and December 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with multidirectional instability, concomitant rotator cuff tears, osteochondritis dissecans of the glenoid or humeral head, superior labral anterior-posterior tears, biceps pathologies, and humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament were excluded. Patients were grouped according to direction of instability (anterior, posterior, or combined), and patient characteristics, instability characteristics, suture anchor use, and GBL were compared between the 3 cohorts.

In total, 117 patients met the study inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 29 years, 89.7% were male, the dominant extremity was involved in 63.2%, 65.8% attributed their injuries to a singular traumatic event, and the mean follow-up was 7.9 years. There was no significant difference regarding patient characteristics, injury mechanism, or follow-up time between the 3 cohorts. As compared with the combined-type instability cohort, mean anterior GBL was greater in the anterior instability cohort (8.00% ± 4.40% vs 4.98% ± 5.26% for combined; P = .012), while mean posterior GBL was greater in the posterior instability cohort (7.44% ± 4.54% vs 4.86% ± 5.69% for combined; P = .024). There was no significant difference in mean total GBL between the combined-type (9.84% ± 7.82%) and either of the unidirectional cohorts (anterior: 8.00% ± 4.40% [P = .231]; posterior: 7.44% ± 4.54% [P = .082]).

GBL in the direction of instability was found to be significantly greater in the unidirectional versus combined-type instability cohorts.

Glenoid bone grafting procedures are often utilized to address glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative advanced imaging can accurately predict coracoid graft size and conversion of off-track to on-track Hill-Sachs lesions in patients undergoing Latarjet procedures.

Patients who underwent Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability at a single institution from 2012 to 2020 with preoperative and postoperative advanced shoulder imaging (computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans) were retrospectively reviewed. Glenoid diameter, Hill-Sachs interval (HSI), and measurements of the coracoid length, depth, and height were measured on preoperative imaging. Glenoid track (GT), percent glenoid bone loss, predicted restoration of GT, and the difference between HSI and GT (ΔHSI-GT) were calculated.

Seventeen patients with a mean age of 25 ± 9 years met inclusion criteria. Average glenoid bone loss preoperatively was 24 ± 7% and average HSI was 27 ± 5mm. The Latarjet procedure reconstructed 116 ± 8% of the native glenoid, and 104 ± 8% of the predicted diameter. Of the 15 patients that had off-track lesions preoperatively, 11 were successfully converted to on-track lesions (73%). The 4 persistent off-track lesions had a significantly higher HSI (32 ± 2 mm vs. 26 ± 4 mm, P = .002). Preoperative measurements accurately predicted postoperative GT status in 94% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 2 years, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate or rate of revision stabilization procedures between patients with on-track versus persistent off-track humeral lesions.

Preoperative advanced imaging measurements can accurately predict whether an off-track Hill-Sachs can be converted to on-track after Latarjet procedure, further enhancing shoulder stability.

Surgical planning for anterior shoulder instability (ASI) necessitates accurate measurements of glenoid bone defects, but current methods are either challenging or too complex for practical use. This underscores the need for a simplified, but precise, assessment technique for anterior glenoid bone defects.

To introduce a new measurement technique that requires only computed tomography (CT) of the affected shoulder joint and simultaneously simplifies the assessment of bone defects in the anterior glenoid.

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

CT scans of the glenoid from 285 healthy participants and 43 patients with unilateral ASI were collected and reconstructed in 3 dimensions. Initially, we established the proportional relationship between the maximum height and width in the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions of the glenoid as well as the location of their intersection (point O) in healthy participants. Subsequently, glenoid bone defects in patients with ASI were measured using the contralateral comparison method, the best-fit circle method, the CT-specific formula method, and our novel proportional method. We analyzed the differences in defect ratios and sizes as well as glenoid track calculations among the 4 methods.

The mean width-to-height ratio of the glenoid was determined to be 0.69 ± 0.04, allowing for the simplification of the calculation to width = 0.7 × height for clinical convenience. Point O was consistently located at the lower one-third of the glenoid height. There was no statistical significance noted in the measurements of bone defect size and bone defect ratio when comparing the novel proportional method, the contralateral comparison method, and the best-fit circle method; however, a significant increase in bone defect size and bone defect ratio was estimated with the CT-specific formula method (defect size: F = 19.20, P < .0001; defect ratio: F = 15.99, P < .0001).

We introduced a novel method for estimating the width of glenoid bone defects through the proportion of glenoid width to height, finding that 70% of the glenoid height at its lower one-third closely approximated its maximum width. This approach, requiring only CT data from the affected shoulder, simplified calculations and matched the accuracy of traditional methods. It offers potential clinical benefits in evaluating glenoid defects.

Glenoid and humeral bone loss is associated with a high incidence of recurrent shoulder instability and failure of arthroscopic stabilization procedures. However, the radiographic evaluation of bony Bankart and Hill-Sachs injuries continues to pose a diagnostic challenge, and a universally accepted optimal method of measurement is lacking. The purpose of this review is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of various techniques and imaging modalities available for measuring glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability, including conventional roentgenography, 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also review the concepts of engaging "on-track" and "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesions. Finally, we highlight the clinical importance of obtaining accurate determinations of bone loss by the various methods available, as it can affect surgical decision making and the appropriate procedure required to ensure shoulder stability is adequately restored.

To analyze the causes of failure after a Latarjet procedure and to evaluate the results of revision surgery.

Single-cohort, retrospective, observational study. Fifteen patients (13 males, mean age at revision failed Latarjet 38.9 years [range, 20-57]) with anterior glenohumeral instability who underwent a revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure were reviewed. Failure was defined as subluxation or dislocation. Demographic features, the reason for failure, type of lesions observed, and postoperative clinical and functional status were recorded. Functional status was assessed with the Rowe score. Subjective clinical evaluation was performed using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV).

Recurrence occurred in the first year following the Latarjet procedure in 11 patients (73.3%). The causes of failure were graft avulsion in 3 cases, fracture in 1, coracoid misposition in 2 cases, graft nonunion in 1, advanced osteolysis in 4 cases, and persistence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion in 1. In 3 cases, no identifiable cause of failure but generalized severe hyperlaxity was found. Regarding revision surgery after the Latarjet procedure, 8 patients underwent an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure and in 3 patients the graft was repositioned. In the remaining 4 patients, an extra-articular capsular reinforcement was performed. Regarding the latter, 1 patient suffered new dislocations and required an additional revision surgery consisting of an Eden-Hybinette procedure. All patients remained stable after the revision surgery at the latest follow-up, except 2 who reported subluxations after an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette and an extra-articular capsular reinforcement, but no additional surgical procedure was required. Functional status after revision surgery was satisfactory, with a mean Rowe score of 78 (10-100), WOSI score of 829 (225-1425), and an SSV score of 67 points (40-90).

The causes of failure after a Latarjet procedure were poor bone graft due to mispositioning, avulsion, fracture or resorption, generalized hyperlaxity, and incomplete restoration of the glenoid track. Our study demonstrates that when the cause of failure is identified and addressed, stability is restored, and clinical and functional scores improved.

Remplissage is a procedure that decreases the rate of recurrent instability after arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. This technique involves capsulotenodesis of the infraspinatus tendon and posterior capsule into the Hill-Sachs lesion using 2 knotless anchors with suture passage through the infraspinatus tendon guided by a percutaneous needle. Previously described techniques use knots or anchor placement through the infraspinatus, which can be challenging to control and irreversible if tendon penetration occurs in an undesirable location. Benefits of this technique include less manipulation within the subacromial space, precision with suture passage through the infraspinatus tendon and capsule to maximize spread, and decreased morbidity for the cuff tissue.

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift and isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair have never been prospectively compared under the concept of glenoid track in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, range of motion, and recurrence rate between these 2 surgical techniques. We hypothesized that open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift would provide similar functional outcomes to isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair but with a lower recurrence rate.

A prospective cohort study was conducted with 86 collision athletes divided into 2 groups of 43 patients each. All patients had a subcritical glenoid bone loss ≤13.5% and an on-track Hill Sachs lesion. The average follow-up was 66 (60-93) months for the open group and 68 (60-97) months for the arthroscopic group. The primary functional outcomes of each group were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and for a minimum of 5 years after surgery. The functional outcomes were also compared between the 2 groups. The assessment tools included the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (ASES) score. In addition, recurrent instability and range of motion were also evaluated.

In each group, there were significant differences in Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale score between the pre and postoperative periods. There were no differences between the groups at the end of follow-up (P = .47 and .22). Three dislocations (6.9%) in the open group and 10 dislocations (23.2%) in the arthroscopic group were reported showing significant differences (P = .012). In addition, there were no differences in range of motion between pre and postoperative periods for each group as well as between them.

We found no differences in functional outcomes and range of motion between the 2 groups. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the arthroscopic group. We recommend performing open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift as a treatment alternative in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Glenohumeral instability is a common pathology, particularly in young, active patients.

A narrative review was performed to describe the history of surgical treatments for anterior shoulder instability.

Open surgical techniques were first described by Bankart in 1923. Techniques include both anatomic soft tissue repairs and nonanatomic procedures to provide constraint to motion and dislocation. Osseous techniques to address glenoid bone loss include both autograft techniques, such as the Latarjet procedure, and the use of various allografts. Technologic advances, particularly arthroscopy, have continued to drive the evolution of treatments. The concept of the glenoid track has furthered our understanding of this pathology to guide appropriate treatment to reduce recurrence.

Surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability continues to evolve in an effort to restore function and prevent additional injury.

Management of patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability in the setting of subcritical glenoid bone loss (GBL), defined in this study as 20% GBL or less, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (ABR + R) to open Latarjet for subcritical GBL in primary or revision procedures. We hypothesized that ABR + R would yield higher rates of recurrent instability and reoperation compared to Latarjet in both primary and revision settings.

A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing either arthroscopic ABR + R or an open Latarjet procedure. Patients with connective tissue disorders, critical GBL (>20%), <2 year follow-up, or insufficient data were excluded. Recurrent instability and revision were the primary outcomes of interest. Additional outcomes of interest included subjective shoulder value, strength, and range of motion (ROM) RESULTS: One hundred eight patients (70 ABR + R, 38 Latarjet) were included with an average follow-up of 4.3 ± 2.1 years. In the primary and revision settings, similar rates of recurrent instability (Primary: P = .60; Revision: P = .28) and reoperation (Primary: P = .06; Revision: P = 1.00) were observed between Latarjet and ABR + R. Primary ABR + R exhibited better subjective shoulder value, active ROM, and internal rotation strength compared to primary open Latarjet. However, no differences were observed in the revision setting.

Similar rates of recurrent instability and reoperation in addition to comparable outcomes with no differences in ROM were found for ABR + R and Latarjet in patients with subcritical GBL in both the primary and revision settings. ABR + R can be a safe and effective procedure in appropriately selected patients with less than 20% GBL for both primary and revision stabilization.

Arthroscopic Latarjet using suture-button fixation has shown good clinical results and low recurrent instability in patients with significant glenoid bone loss. However, the presence of an associated Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) is a risk factor for recurrent instability after isolated Latarjet. The aim of the study was to report clinical and radiologic results following all-arthroscopic Latarjet combined with Hill-Sachs remplissage (HSR).

Monocentric prospective study including 41 patients (mean age 28 ± 7 years) who underwent the combined procedure between 2014 and 2019 with minimum 2 years' follow-up (mean 40 ± 13 months). Indications were glenoid bone loss >10% (mean 23.9% ± 7.5%) and large, deep HSL (Calandra 3). Five (13%) patients had signs of osteoarthrosis stage I preoperatively, 4 (10%) had previous stabilization surgery (3 cases isolated Bankart and 1 case Bankart combined with HSR), and 4 (13%) were epileptic. The HSR was performed first followed by guided Latarjet procedure. Primary outcome measures included shoulder stability and function represented by Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) for daily life/sports. Secondary outcome measures included coracoid graft position and union, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis using radiographs and computed tomography.

Three patients (7%) had recurrent instability: 1 due to seizure, 1 following fall, and 1 related to graft osteolysis. Two patients were revised because of recurrence with arthroscopic distal clavicle autograft. There were no infections, neurologic complications, or hardware failures. The Walch-Duplay score was 90 (95% CI 76.8-93.2), and the Rowe score 95 (95% CI 77.2-92.2). The median SSV averaged 96% (95% CI 87.5-97.0) for daily life and 90% (95% CI 75.7-90.2) for sports. Mean external rotation with the arm at the side was 60° (95% CI 59°-70°) with a median loss 10° (95% CI 3°-17°) compared to the contralateral side. Among patients playing sport preoperatively, 36 (95%) were able to return to sport: 25 (67%) at the same level and 7 (18%) at a lower level, whereas 4 had to change sport. The coracoid graft was flush with the glenoid surface in 96% of cases and subequatorial in 89%. The graft developed nonunion in 11% and fractured in 5%. Seven patients (18%) had radiographic signs of grade I osteoarthritis.

Combined arthroscopic Latarjet and HSR is an efficient solution for dealing with significant bipolar glenohumeral bone loss. The combined procedure deserves consideration in high-risk patients including combined bone loss, recurrent anterior instability after failed stabilization procedures and/or seizure.

The risk of Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) to cause instability depends not only on the HSL but also on the glenoid size. Clinically, the only method to assess the risk of instability considering the dynamic interaction of both, the HSL together with the glenoid bone loss, is the glenoid track concept. Since it was introduced in a cadaveric study, its clinical efficacy and validity have been reported in the literature. Sometimes, the medial margin of the footprint (lateral margin of the glenoid track) is difficult to identify when a HSL is overriding the footprint. In such cases, we propose a method to draw an imaginary line connecting 2 landmarks. Although 3-dimensional computed tomography is the most accurate and widely used method to assess on/off-track lesions, our interest gradually is shifting toward magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which has no radiation concern. The current magnetic resonance method is still under way. There are various risk factors influencing the recurrent instability after surgery. The glenoid track concept deals with only 1 of these factors, that is, instability caused by bony lesions. Therefore, the following 2 issues are important: 1) how to assess the glenoid track precisely and 2) how to incorporate other risk factors into consideration. The former can be achieved by obtaining the custom-made glenoid track width using not the fixed value of 83%, but more individualized value obtained by measuring the active horizontal extension angle of the opposite shoulder in the sitting position. At the same time, the gray zone (peripheral-track lesion) needs to be clearly defined. The latter can be achieved by incorporating the risk factors other than the bony lesions. One example is the Glenoid Track Instability Management Score (GTIMS), a combination of the glenoid track concept and the instability severity index score. This new scoring system is expected to increase the predictive potential of the scoring system, and accordingly to enhance clinical decision-making.