Periprosthetic joint infections remain a major complication in total joint arthroplasty. Tremendous efforts made intraoperatively to prevent periprosthetic joint infection during primary procedures include antiseptics or antibiotics in irrigation solutions. This study analyzed the incidence of postoperative infection in relation to use of irrigation solutions and antibiotic powder.

We reviewed primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cases from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative between January 2019 and December 2022. Data on irrigation solutions were categorized by those containing antibiotics, chlorhexidine-gluconate, povidone-iodine, or other substances, compared to normal saline. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for various factors such as age, body mass index, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, smoking, and more. There were 67,871 THA and 105,963 TKA cases analyzed, with an overall infection rate of 0.6% (confidence interval: 0.6 to 0.7, n = 420) for THA and 0.4% (0.36 to 0.43, n = 419) for TKA within 90 days postsurgery.

There were statistical differences between the use of normal saline alone versus other irrigation solutions in THA, including povidone and others. For TKA, there was a statistically significant difference with lower infection rates using normal saline alone than multiple types, chlorhexidine-gluconate, and povidone. Notably, the use of nonsaline irrigation increased over the study period.

There was no reduction in 90-day infection rates for primary THA or TKA with irrigation additives. Higher infection rates were noted with povidone than saline for THA and TKA, potentially due to selection bias or local adverse tissue effects. Topical powders did not improve infection control. While irrigation is strongly recommended in all patients having TKA or THA, multiple irrigation solutions were not correlated with lower infection rates, suggesting importance of patient selection and optimization over irrigation type.

In terms of perioperative infections, arthroplasty for obese patients represents a high-risk procedure. Correct antibiotic prophylaxis is a central pillar of infection prophylaxis. Studies showed increased infection rates if an antibiotic other than cefazolin was administered for prophylaxis. In patients with anamnestic penicillin allergy, an existing allergy is extremely rare, and the presence of cross-allergies to cephalosporins is similarly rare. Consequently, every effort should be made to administer a first- or second generation cephalosporin such as cefazolin.

Whether the dosage of antibiotic prophylaxis should be adjusted to the body weight remains unclear due to the limited data available: case series showed increased infection rates when cefazolin was underdosed and recommended increasing the dose to 3 g if the body weight exceeds 120 kg. However, no studies with a higher level of evidence exist. Published studies on the effective antibiotic levels in the tissue remain contradictory with regard to possible weight-dependent dose adjustments. Similarly, there is insufficient data on whether local intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis may be useful in obese patients. By contrast, there is no evidence for a positive benefit of double prophylaxis with two different antibiotics or prolonged postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in obesity.

In summary, the data on antibiotic prophylaxis is generally insufficient, especially when focussing on possible dose adjustments in obesity. The well-timed administration of a cephalosporin such as cefazolin represents the golden standard in orthopedics and trauma surgery. A possible dose adjustment to 3 g for a body weight over 120 kg appears reasonable considering the low costs and the broad therapeutic window and is therefore recommended in the current AWMF S3 guideline.

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of local antibiotic prophylaxis (e.g., powder, bone cement, intraosseous injection) in reducing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and deep wound infections in adults undergoing primary joint replacement surgery. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to 7 September 2024, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies without language restrictions. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies. Infection rates were extracted and analyzed using risk ratios (RR) or odds ratios (OR) in a random-effects model with Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4. Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were also performed to validate the study results and possible risk factors. Results: Twelve RCTs and 21 cohort studies were included in the review. Vancomycin powder in the cohort studies demonstrated statistical significance (OR = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.61, I2 = 0%), in contrast to the results in the RCTs (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.06-2.47, I2 = 49%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness and statistical significance of these findings. Both the control and treatment groups primarily cultured Gram-positive pathogens, including in the overall data and specifically for vancomycin powder. The evidence for the use of intraosseous injection (RR of RCTs not estimable, I2 not applicable; OR of cohorts = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.63, I2 = 0%) and bone cement (RR of RCTs = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.14-1.17, I2 = 56%; OR of cohorts = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.25-2.82, I2 not applicable) was inconclusive. Smoking was identified as an important risk factor for post-operative infection. Further research, including more robust trials and cohort studies, is needed to confirm these findings. Conclusions: Local administration of vancomycin powder appears effective in preventing deep wound infection after arthroplasty.

Background/Objectives: This study explores the long-term clinical outcomes of antibiotic-impregnated calcium hydroxyapatite (CHA) as an antibiotic delivery system in treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 12 patients (13 hips) who were treated with antibiotic-impregnated CHA for PJI after THA and followed for more than 10 years at our institution between 1999 and 2011. The study group comprised six men (seven hips) and six women, with a mean age of 61.4 years. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 13.8 years. After irrigation and debridement with modular component exchange, seven hips in six patients underwent revision surgery; however, PJI relapsed in two hips of two patients with a history of diabetes. Two-stage revision surgery was performed on the two relapsed hips and six scheduled hips with antibiotic-impregnated CHA used to treat all cases of PJI. Infection control (100% rate) was achieved in all joints, and revision surgeries were completed. Two patients died 12 years after the initial procedure, and one died 14 years after the first procedure due to unrelated internal diseases; no infection recurrence was observed. No complications related to antibiotic-impregnated CHA were observed. Conclusions: Our results indicate that antibiotic-impregnated CHA is associated with high success rates in treating PJI after THA, even in cases with advanced disease, and yields satisfactory functional outcomes postoperatively.

The selection of an appropriate chemical solution in wound care reduces the severity of wounds and accelerates the healing process. Povidone-iodine (PV-I), a chemical solution popularly known as an antiseptic, is frequently used in studies of wound care to prevent wound infection and accelerate woud the process of wound healing.

To identify the latest evidence on the benefits of PV-I in wound infection prevention and healing in all areas.

This review is a scoping review by Arskey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) is used for reporting. The literature search used databases including PubMed, CINAHL, and search engines such as Scopus. This study was conducted using thematic analysis.

This review yielded 19 out of 2109 studies that were identified in the initial search. Four outcomes comprised 20 sub-outcomes have been identified. Although strong evidence is lacking, PV-I in the form of foam is effective in improving wound healing, shortening healing time, and producing fewer adverse events than hydrocelluers. Moreover, saline and PV-I are effective as skin disinfectants when compared to saline alone in reducing surgical site infection (SSI), and they are also more effective than hypochlorous acid in improving wound healing. Nevertheless, there was no difference between PV-I and hypochlorous acid in the prevention of SSI and bacterial growth. In terms of healing time, silver foam and hyaluronic acid were more favorable than PV-I. Moreover, the use of chlorhexidine to improve SSI and silver dressing to improve hospital stay is more favorable than that of PV-I.

There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of wound care outcomes, and the efficacy of PV-I as a surface disinfectant for wound infection prevention remains controversial. Consequently, PV-I is not highly recommended for wound care, and further investigation into the effectiveness of PV-I as a surface disinfectant is required for various types of surgeries.

With the increasing number of joint replacement surgeries, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has become a significant concern in orthopedic practice, making research on PJI prevention paramount. Therefore, the study will aim to compare the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine and topical vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine alone on the PJI incidence rate in patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

The prospective randomized clinical trial will be conducted in two independent voivodeship hospitals with extensive experience in lower limb arthroplasties. The studied material will comprise 840 patients referred to hospitals for primary THA or TKA. The patients will be randomly allocated to two equal groups, receiving two different interventions during joint replacement. In group I, povidone-iodine irrigation and consecutively topical vancomycin powder will be used before wound closure. In group II, only povidone-iodine lavage irrigation will be used before wound closure. The primary outcome will be the incidence rate of PJI based on the number of patients with PJI occurrence within 90 days after arthroplasty. The occurrence will be determined using a combined approach, including reviewing hospital records for readmissions and follow-up phone interviews with patients. The infection will be diagnosed based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. The chi-square test will be used to compare the infection rates between the two studied groups. Risk and odds ratios for the between-groups comparison purposes will also be estimated. Medical cost analysis will also be performed.

A randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined usage of povidone-iodine irrigation and vancomycin powder to the use of povidone-iodine irrigation alone in preventing PJIs after primary arthroplasty is crucial to advancing knowledge in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes, and guiding evidence-based clinical practices.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05972603 . Registered on 2 August 2023.

Vancomycin powder (VP) has been positively used in spinal surgery to reduce the rate of infections. Hardly any data have been published on hip and knee joint replacement surgery, and its usefulness is questioned. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of VP in reducing prosthetic infection and its possible complications.

Primary hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties were reviewed, performed by five surgeons in one hospital centre, between 2017 and 2018. One gram of VP was used on the implant prior to surgical closure based on the surgeon's preferences. With a 5-year follow-up in which the infection rate and local complications were analysed.

One thousand one hundred and fifty-one arthroplasties were performed, 748 were TKA and 403 were THA. Nine patients were diagnosed with prosthetic infection, of which five received VP and four did not (p=0.555). Likewise, another 15 patients suffered wound complications, of which 11 received VP and 4 did not (p=0.412). There were no differences, either, in the rest of the complications depending on the use or not of VP (p=0.101). Likewise, the number of patients who needed reintervention was similar (p=0.999). No systemic complications were detected due to the use of VP.

It has not been possible to demonstrate that the use of VP reduces the rates of prosthetic infection in the hip and knee, so we cannot recommend its use.

Intravenous antibiotic infusion has been the standard prophylaxis for total joint arthroplasty surgery. However, infection rates still occur at 1%-2% in many series. Single-dose intra-articular antibiotics (IAAs) present a safe and potentially more effective prophylactic regime in total joint arthroplasty. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of a single-dose IAA injection on PJI rates in a single surgeon series of hip and knee arthroplasty.

We reviewed the data of all patients operated on for a primary hip or knee replacement from 2010 to 2021. From January 2018, 1 gm of vancomycin in 10 ml of saline was injected into every total joint replacement after fascial closure. A comparison was made with PJI referencing the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry data on revision for the 2 periods: 2010-2017 and 2018-2021.

During the period without IAA (2010-2017) for TKR, 6 of 489 (1.2%), and for THR, 5 of 694 (0.7%) had PJI requiring revision surgery. In the period with IAA (2018-2021) for TKR, 0 of 214 (0%, P = .11), and for THR, 1 of 517 (0.2%, P = .19) PJI required revision surgery, but the overall incidence of PJI for TKR and THR was significantly reduced (P = .03).

A single dose of intra-articular vancomycin 1 gm injected into the total joint replacement following fascial closure reduced the incidence of deep PJI requiring a revision surgery in a single-surgeon series. These results demonstrate significant benefits to this technique which merit further larger trials.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare but terrible complication in hip and knee arthroplasty, and the use of topical vancomycin powder (VP) has been investigated as a tool to potentially reduce its incidence. However, there remains no consensus on its efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an overview on the application of topical vancomycin in orthopaedic surgery focusing on the recent evidence and results in total joint arthroplasty. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses on topical VP in hip and knee arthroplasty have been recently published reporting sometimes conflicting results. Apart from all being limited by the quality of the included studies (mostly level III and IV), confounding variables are often included potentially leading to biased conclusions. If taken into consideration the exclusive use of VP in isolation, the available data, although very limited, suggest that it does not reduce the infection rate in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Therefore, we still cannot advise for a routinary application. A properly powered randomized-controlled trial would be necessary to clarify the role of VP in hip and knee arthroplasty. Based on the analysis of the current evidence, the use of topical VP appears to be safe when used locally in terms of systemic adverse reactions, hence, if proven to be effective, it could bring great benefits due to its low cost and accessibility.

Seawater immersion wound is inevitably accompanied by bacterial infection. Effective irrigation is critical for bacterial infection prevention and wound healing. In this study, the antimicrobial efficacy of a designed composite irrigation solution against several dominant pathogens in seawater immersion wounds was evaluated, and in vivo wound healing assessment was conducted in a rat model. According to the time-kill result, the composite irrigation solution exhibits excellent and rapid bactericidal effect against Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus within 30 s of treatment while eliminating Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and the mixed microbes after 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, and 12 h of treatment, respectively. Significant bacterial count reduction of Staphylococcus aureus was observed after 5 h treatment. In addition to its skin non-irritating attribute, the in vivo wound healing results further demonstrated that the irrigation solution showed high repair efficiency in the skin defect model inoculated with the mixed microbes. The wound healing rate was significantly higher than that of the control and normal saline groups. It could also effectively reduce the number of viable bacteria on the wound surface. The histological staining indicated that the irrigation solution could reduce inflammatory cells and promote collagen fibers and angiogenesis, thereby promoting wound healing. We believed that the designed composite irrigation solution has great potential for application in the treatment of seawater immersion wounds.