Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Schutzer SF, Harris WH. High placement of porous-coated acetabular components in complex total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:359-67. [PMID: 7964766 DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90045-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open

For:	Schutzer SF, Harris WH. High placement of porous-coated acetabular components in complex total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:359-67. [PMID: 7964766 DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90045-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Mortazavi SMJ, Hosseini-Monfared P, Atilla B, Bilgen OF, Gahramanov A, Kreuzer S, Razzaghof M, Shubnyakov I, Zagra L. Is There a Difference in the Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Patients Who Have Developmental Dysplasia when the Acetabular Component Is Positioned in the Anatomical Position Versus the High Hip Center? J Arthroplasty 2025;40:S145-S147. [PMID: 39461541 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024] Open

Murylev V, Muzychenkov A, Elizarov P, Kukovenko G, Alekseev S, Zhuchkov AG, Erokhin NE. Long-term functional results of revision hip replacement using Burch-Schneider cages. J Orthop 2023;37:53-58. [PMID: 36974092 PMCID: PMC10039112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open

Abstract

Introduction

One of the most common and effective treatments for end-stage hip osteoarthritis is total hip arthroplasty (THA). According to the WHO, 1.5 million, more than 500,000, and approximately 100,000 THAs are performed annually in the world, in the USA, and in Russia, respectively. The use of Burch-Schneider cages has progressively increased since their introduction in 1975, with more than 125,000 cages being implanted by 2006. This design for revision surgery remains valid today.The objectives were to conduct a retrospective analysis of anti-protrusion cages in revision THA and evaluate long-term functional results.

Methods

Fifty-eight revision surgeries were performed at Botkin Hospital from 2003 to 2020 with anti-protrusion Burch-Schneider cages because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. The average age of the examined patients was 61.2 (±12.9) years. The maximum follow-up duration was 17 years. The average follow-up duration was 10.5 (±4.1) years. We used the functional Harris, WOMAC, SF-36, and FJS-12 scales to evaluate functional results. The patients were distributed into the following groups according to the Paprosky classification: 2C, 3A, and 3B.

Results

Group 2C showed good functional results, with a Harris score of 87 (±6.9), an FJS-12 score of 63.2 (±4.8), a WOMAC score of 175 (±16.7), and an Oxford Hip score of 39.06 (±9.1). Group 3A also showed good functional scores, with a Harris score of 78 (±7.1), an FJS-12 score of 61.2 (±5.1), a WOMAC score of 168 (±17.1), and an Oxford Hip score of 42.12 (±8.7). Group 3B showed satisfactory functional results, with a Harris score of 70 (±5.9), an FJS-12 score of 58.9 (±4.4), a WOMAC score of 166 (±18.1), and an Oxford Hip score of 48.4 (±9.4).Among patients who underwent revision surgery using Burch-Schneider rings, 16 needed to undergo repeat revision surgery. Periprosthetic infection occurred in 5 patients, aseptic loosening in 7, and periprosthetic fracture in 3.

Conclusions

The anti-protrusion Burch-Schneider system is a necessary and up-to-date element of THA and can be used with great efficacy in revision THA. Despite the rapid development of technologies and the appearance of new, highly efficient devices, there is still room for systems such as Burch-Schneider rings. However, there are relatively few indications for their use, with the main indications for the use of anti-protrusion systems being conditions related to bone defects of the acetabular roof and bone mass loss of the acetabular floor.

Collapse

Femoral Head Autograft to Manage Acetabular Bone Loss Defects in THA for Crowe III Hips by DAA: Retrospective Study and Surgical Technique. J Clin Med 2023;12:jcm12030751. [PMID: 36769400 PMCID: PMC9918157 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open

Bari YA, Chilmi MZ, Arianto HF, Soetojo BW. Morselized bone autograft for high placement of acetabular component closure with hip arthroplasty revision after 3-years screws and cup loosening: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2022;101:107789. [PMID: 36459851 PMCID: PMC9712815 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open

Cozzi Lepri A, Innocenti M, Galeotti A, Carulli C, Villano M, Civinini R. Trabecular titanium cups in acetabular revision arthroplasty: analysis of 10-year survivorship, restoration of center of rotation and osteointegration. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022;142:3523-3531. [PMID: 34782910 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04243-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]

Singh A, Telagareddy K, Kumar P, Singh S, Singh RN, Singh PK. THA in patients with neglected acetabular fractures. SICOT J 2022;8:37. [PMID: 36040232 PMCID: PMC9426301 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2022028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open

Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of the Anatomical Center and High Hip Center Techniques in the Treatment of Adult Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022;2022:7256664. [PMID: 36082152 PMCID: PMC9448599 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7256664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]

Abstract Background. In total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip, there is considerable controversy regarding the placement of the acetabular cup, anatomic center, and upward in acetabular reconstruction. This article explores the efficacy of the anatomical center technique and high hip center technique in the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip. Method. By searching for articles in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases, we collected the literature on the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip by anatomical center and high hip center technology and screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials, the quality of the literature in retrospective cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, and the RevMan 5.4 software was used to analyze the extracted outcome indicators. Results. Nine studies were finally included, including one prospective cohort study, eight retrospective cohort studies, two high-quality studies, and six moderate-quality studies. The meta-analysis results showed that the reconstruction of the acetabulum in two positions was significantly different in terms of operation time (

WMD = - 37

, 95% CI: -45.25-28.74,

P < 0.00001

), intraoperative blood loss (

WMD = - 91.88

, 95% CI: -108.57-75.19,

P < 0.00001

), postoperative drainage volume (

WMD = 80.55

, 95% CI: -140.56-301.66,

P = 0.48

), time to ground (

WMD = - 0.68

, 95% CI: -1.37-0.0,

P = 0.05

), Harris score (

WMD = - 0.04

, 95% CI: -0.91-0.82,

P = 0.92

), lower limb length difference (

WMD = 0.21

, 95% CI: -0.22-0.64,

P = 0.33

), WOMAC score (

WMD = - 1.24

, 95% CI: -4.89-2.41,

P = 0.51

), postoperative complications (

RD = - 0.02

, 95% CI: -0.06-0.02,

P = 0.44

), Trendelenburg sign (

RD = - 0.02

, 95% CI: -0.02-0.05,

P = 0.31

), limb lengthening (

WMD = 0.85

, 95% CI: 0.61-1.09,

P < 0.00001

), prosthesis wear (

WMD = 0.01

, 95% CI: 0-0.02,

P = 0.17

), and prosthesis loosening (

RD = 0.01

, 95% CI: -0.02-0.04,

P = 0.45

). Conclusions. The high hip center technique can reduce operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and downtime. The anatomical center technique is superior to the high hip center technique in terms of limb lengthening. Compared with acetabular anatomical reconstruction, there was no significant difference in postoperative drainage, lower limb length difference, postoperative complications, Trendelenburg sign, and prosthesis survival or wear. For DDH patients who are not severely shortened in the lower limbs and have severe acetabular bone defects, joint surgeons can choose to reconstruct the acetabulum in the upper part to simplify the operation, reduce the trauma of the patient, and accelerate the recovery of the patient, and they can choose to adjust the length of the neck and the angle of the neck shaft to maintain the moment arm of the abductor muscle. A ceramic interface or a highly cross-linked polyethylene interface minimizes the effect of hip response forces. To further evaluate the efficacy of the anatomical center technique and the high hip center technique in the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip, more large-sample, high-quality, long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials are still needed for verification. Collapse

Stirling P, Viamont-Guerra MR, Strom L, Chen AF, Saffarini M, Nover L, Laude F. Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021;479:1119-1130. [PMID: 33539054 PMCID: PMC8051996 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One goal of THA is to restore the anatomic hip center, which can be achieved in hips with developmental dysplasia by placing cups at the level of the native acetabulum. However, this might require adjuvant procedures such as femoral shortening osteotomy. Another option is to place the cup at the high hip center, potentially reducing surgical complexity. Currently, no clear consensus exists regarding which of these cup positions might offer better functional outcomes or long-term survival.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review to determine whether (1) functional outcomes as measured by the Harris hip score, (2) revision incidence, and (3) complications that do not result in revision differ based on the position of the acetabular cup (high hip center versus anatomic hip center) in patients undergoing THA for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, including studies comparing the functional outcomes, revision incidence, and complications of primary THA in dysplastic hips with acetabular cups placed at the high hip center versus those placed at the anatomic hip center, over any time frame. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020168183) before commencement. Of 238 records, eight comparative, retrospective nonrandomized studies of interventions were eligible for our systematic review, reporting on 207 hips with cups placed at the high hip center and 268 hips with cups at the anatomic hip center. Risk of bias within eligible studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Due to low comparability between studies, data could not be pooled, so these studies were assessed without summary effects.

RESULTS

Six studies compared Harris hip scores, two of which favored high hip center cup placement and three of which favored anatomic hip center cup placement, although none of the differences between cohorts met the minimum clinically important difference. Five studies reliably compared revision incidence, which ranged from 2% to 9% for high hip center at 7 to 15 years and 0% to 5.9% for anatomic hip center at 6 to 16 years. Five studies reported intra- and postoperative complications, with the high hip center being associated with higher incidence of dislocation and lower incidence of neurological complications. No clear difference was observed in intraoperative complications between the high hip center and anatomic hip center.

CONCLUSION

No obvious differences could be observed in Harris hip score or revision incidence after THA for osteoarthritis secondary to DDH between cups placed at the anatomic hip center and those placed at the high hip center. Placement of the acetabular cup in the high hip center may lead to higher risk of dislocation but lower risk of neurologic complications, although no difference in intraoperative complications was observed. Surgeons should be able to achieve satisfactory functional scores and revision incidence using either technique, although they should be aware of how their choice influences hip biomechanics and the need for adjunct procedures and associated risks and operative time. These recommendations should be considered with respect to the several limitations in the studies reviewed, including the presence of serious confounding factors and selection biases, inconsistent definitions of the high hip center, variations in dysplasia severity, small sample sizes, and follow-up periods. These weaknesses should be addressed in well-designed future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Patrick Stirling P. Stirling, L. Strom, M. Saffarini, L. Nover, ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland P. Stirling, ReSurg UK, Herefordshire, UK M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, F. Laude, Ramsay Santé, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Paris, France M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, Hip Surgery Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil A. F. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Maria-Roxana Viamont-Guerra P. Stirling, L. Strom, M. Saffarini, L. Nover, ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland P. Stirling, ReSurg UK, Herefordshire, UK M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, F. Laude, Ramsay Santé, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Paris, France M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, Hip Surgery Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil A. F. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Louise Strom P. Stirling, L. Strom, M. Saffarini, L. Nover, ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland P. Stirling, ReSurg UK, Herefordshire, UK M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, F. Laude, Ramsay Santé, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Paris, France M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, Hip Surgery Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil A. F. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Antonia F. Chen P. Stirling, L. Strom, M. Saffarini, L. Nover, ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland P. Stirling, ReSurg UK, Herefordshire, UK M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, F. Laude, Ramsay Santé, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Paris, France M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, Hip Surgery Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil A. F. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Mo Saffarini P. Stirling, L. Strom, M. Saffarini, L. Nover, ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland P. Stirling, ReSurg UK, Herefordshire, UK M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, F. Laude, Ramsay Santé, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Paris, France M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, Hip Surgery Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil A. F. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Luca Nover P. Stirling, L. Strom, M. Saffarini, L. Nover, ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland P. Stirling, ReSurg UK, Herefordshire, UK M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, F. Laude, Ramsay Santé, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Paris, France M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, Hip Surgery Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil A. F. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Frederic Laude P. Stirling, L. Strom, M. Saffarini, L. Nover, ReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland P. Stirling, ReSurg UK, Herefordshire, UK M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, F. Laude, Ramsay Santé, Clinique du Sport Paris V, Paris, France M.-R. Viamont-Guerra, Hip Surgery Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil A. F. Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Collapse

Hamrayev AJ, Buyukkuscu MO, Misir A, Gursu SS. The fate of femoral head autograft in acetabular reconstruction in dysplastic hips at midterm. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2021;28:2309499020957109. [PMID: 32996378 DOI: 10.1177/2309499020957109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open

Sonohata M, Nakashima T, Kitajima M, Kawano S, Eto S, Mawatari M. Total hip arthroplasty using hydroxyapatite-coated cementless cup for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis: Minimum 10-year follow-up. J Orthop Sci 2021;26:225-229. [PMID: 32273140 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]

Shen J, Sun J, Ma H, Du Y, Li T, Zhou Y. High Hip Center Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type II-III Developmental Dysplasia: Results of Midterm Follow-up. Orthop Surg 2020;12:1245-1252. [PMID: 32776482 PMCID: PMC7454156 DOI: 10.1111/os.12756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to show the utility of high hip center technique used in patients with Crowe II–III developmental dysplasia of the hip at the midterm follow‐up and evaluated the clinical and radiographic results between different heights of hip center.

Methods

From December 2003 to November 2013, we retrospectively evaluated 69 patients (85 hips) with Crowe II–III dysplasia who underwent a high hip center cementless total hip arthroplasty. The patients were divided into two groups according to the height of hip center, respectively group A (≥ 22 mm and < 28 mm) and group B (≥28 mm). The survivorship outcomes and radiographic and clinical results, including the vertical and horizontal distances of hip center, femoral offset, abductor lever arm, cup inclination, leg length discrepancy, Trendelenburg sign, and limp were evaluated.

Results

The mean follow‐up time was 8.9 ± 1.8 years. The mean location of the hip center from the inter‐teardrop was 25.1 ± 1.6 mm vertically and 30.0 ± 3.8 mm horizontally in group A, and 33.1 ± 4.8 mm vertically and 31.4 ± 6.1 mm horizontally in group B. Eleven hips of group B showed a lateralization over 10 mm, and the same was shown in one hip in group A (P = 0.012). There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in postoperative femoral offset, abductor lever arm, leg length discrepancy and cup inclination. At the final follow up, the mean WOMAC and Harris hip score were significantly improved in both groups. Of the 85 hips, four hips in group A and three hips in group B showed a positive Trendelenburg sign. Additionally, four patients in group A and two patients in group B presented with a limp. No significant differences were shown regarding the Harris hip score, WOMAC score, Trendelenburg sign, and limp between two groups. One hip of group A was revised by reason of dislocation at 8.3 years after surgery. One hip of group B was diagnosed with osteolysis and underwent a revision at 8.1 years after surgery. The Kaplan–Meier implants survivorship rates at the final follow‐up for all‐causes revisions in group A and group B were similar (96.7% [95% confidence interval, 90.5%–100%] and 96.2% [95% confidence interval, 89.0%–100%], respectively).

Conclusions

The high hip center technique is a valuable alternative to achieve excellent midterm results for Crowe II–III developmental dysplasia of the hip. Further, between the groups with differing degrees of HHC, there were no significant differences in outcomes or survivorship in our study.

Collapse

Mussa M, Dewan V, Isbister E. Two stage cementation and screw augmentation of large acetabular defects in low demand patients: Early results and surgical technique. J Orthop 2020;18:23-27. [PMID: 32189878 PMCID: PMC7068009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Revised: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open

Moussa A, Rahman S, Xu M, Tanzer M, Pasini D. Topology optimization of 3D-printed structurally porous cage for acetabular reinforcement in total hip arthroplasty. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020;105:103705. [PMID: 32279849 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]

Theil C, Schmidt-Braekling T, Gosheger G, Moellenbeck B, Schwarze J, Dieckmann R. A single centre study of 41 cases on the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:238. [PMID: 31113411 PMCID: PMC6530026 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2626-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open

Berninger MT, Hungerer S, Friederichs J, Stuby FM, Fulghum C, Schipp R. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Severe Dysplastic Hip Osteoarthritis With a Far Proximal Cup Position. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:920-925. [PMID: 30755380 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Aprato A, Olivero M, Branca Vergano L, Massè A. Outcome of cages in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum: a systematic review. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019;90:24-31. [PMID: 30714995 PMCID: PMC6503392 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i1-s.8081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]

Ueno T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Ohmori T, Yoshitani J, Tsuchiya H. Three-Dimensional Host Bone Coverage Required in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Its Relationship With 2-Dimensional Coverage. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:93-101. [PMID: 30342952 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Developmental Dysplasia Treated With Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing High Hip Center Reconstruction: A Minimum 13-Year Follow-up Study. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:2899-2905. [PMID: 29803578 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Cadossi M, Garcia FL, Sambri A, Andreoli I, Dallari D, Pignatti G. A 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up of a Modular Iliac Screw Cup in Major Acetabular Defects: Clinical, Radiographic and Survivorship Analysis With Comparison to the Literature. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:207-213. [PMID: 27449716 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Kwong-Ting H, Kam-Yiu W. Use of Structural Bone Graft for Reconstruction of Acetabular Defects in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 13-year Experience. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jotr.2015.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open

Chen M, Luo ZL, Wu KR, Zhang XQ, Ling XD, Shang XF. Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With a High Hip Center for Hartofilakidis Type B Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Results of Midterm Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty 2016;31:1027-34. [PMID: 26712347 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2015] [Revised: 10/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Kaku N, Tabata T, Tsumura H. Influence of cup-center-edge angle on micro-motion at the interface between the cup and host bone in cementless total hip arthroplasty: three-dimensional finite element analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2015;25:1271-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1697-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]

Does rotational acetabular osteotomy affect subsequent total hip arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015;135:407-15. [PMID: 25577240 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2154-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]

Nawabi DH, Meftah M, Nam D, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Durable fixation achieved with medialized, high hip center cementless THAs for Crowe II and III dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:630-6. [PMID: 23884804 PMCID: PMC3890163 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3187-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A high hip center total hip arthroplasty (THA) for dysplasia allows more complete socket coverage by native bone at the expense of abnormal hip biomechanics. Despite poor results with cemented components, intermediate-term results with cementless cups at a high hip center have been promising, but there are few reports at long-term followup without bone graft.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to examine (1) survivorship; 2) radiographic results; and 3) hip scores at a minimum of 10 years for patients treated with high hip center cementless THA for Crowe II and III dysplasia without bone graft.

METHODS

We reviewed charts and radiographs of 32 patients with Crowe II or III dysplasia who were treated with high hip center cementless THA; at a mean followup of 12 years (range, 10-21 years), 23 patients (27 hips) were available for review. We sought to medialize cups to the inner table to achieve bony coverage of > 75%. At final followup, the WOMAC and Harris hip scores were recorded. Radiographic analysis including computerized wear evaluation was performed. Radiographic parameters were compared with a control group of 23 patients with Crowe I dysplasia who had cementless cups placed at an anatomic hip center; among the high hip center reconstructions, we also compared wear between those in the superolateral and superomedial quadrants.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survivorship for all-cause revisions was 97% (95% confidence interval, 79%-99%) in the high hip center group; this was no different from the anatomic hip center group. There were no revisions for acetabular loosening. Wear rates did not differ significantly between the high hip center and the control group, but lateralized high hip centers were associated with higher (p = 0.002) wear. Hip scores were excellent in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In Crowe II and III dysplasia, a high hip center cementless cup obviates the need for bone graft and provides durable fixation beyond 10 years. Medialization of these reconstructions seems important to decrease wear.

Collapse

Gustke KA, Levering MF, Miranda MA. Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects. J Arthroplasty 2014;29:199-203. [PMID: 23993345 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2012] [Revised: 10/12/2012] [Accepted: 11/16/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Tikhilov RM, Shubnyakov II, Kovalenko AN, Totoyev ZA, Lyu B, Bilyk SS. THE STRUCTURE OF EARLY REVISIONS AFTER HIP REPLACEMENT. TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPEDICS OF RUSSIA 2014. [DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2014-0-2-5-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]

Banerjee S, Issa K, Kapadia BH, Pivec R, Khanuja HS, Mont MA. Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2013;38:689-702. [PMID: 24178061 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2145-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2013] [Accepted: 09/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]

Baghdadi YMK, Larson AN, Sierra RJ. Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:3251-9. [PMID: 23703532 PMCID: PMC3773116 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3072-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acetabular protrusio is an uncommon finding in hip arthritis. Several reconstructive approaches have been used; however the best approach remains undefined.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Our purposes in this study were to (1) describe the THA survivorship for protrusio as a function of the acetabular component, (2) evaluate survivorship of the cup as a function of restoration of radiographic hip mechanics and offset, and (3) report the long-term clinical results.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-seven patients (162 hips) undergoing primary THA with acetabular protrusio were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 66±13 years, and the mean followup was 10±6 years (range, 2-25 years).The cup fixation was uncemented in 107 (83 with bone graft) and cemented in 55 hips (14 with bone graft). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed for restoration of hip mechanics and offset.

RESULTS

The THA survival from aseptic cup revision at 15 years was 89% (95% CI, 75%-96%) for uncemented compared with 85% (95% CI, 68%-94%) for cemented cups. The risk of aseptic cup revision significantly increased by 24% (hazards ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.5) for every 1 mm medial or lateral distance away from the native hip center of rotation to the prosthetic head center. Harris hip scores were improved by mean of 27±20 points (n=123) with a higher postoperative score for uncemented bone grafted compared with solely cemented cups (81±16 versus 71±20 points).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoring hip center of rotation using an uncemented cup with or without bone graft was associated with increased durability in our series. There was a 24% increase in the risk of aseptic cup revision for every 1 mm medial or lateral distance away from the native hip center to the prosthetic head center.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Collapse

Abolghasemian M, Samiezadeh S, Jafari D, Bougherara H, Gross AE, Ghazavi MT. Displacement of the hip center of rotation after arthroplasty of Crowe III and IV dysplasia: a radiological and biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:1031-5. [PMID: 23541865 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2012] [Revised: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 07/20/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Ma W, Zhang X, Zhang Y. The Comparative Analysis of a Novel Acetabular Component against Hemispherical Component in Case of Extensive Acetabular Bone Defects — A Study of Finite Element Analysis. INT J ADV ROBOT SYST 2013. [DOI: 10.5772/54561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open

Optimized design for a novel acetabular component with three wings. A study of finite element analysis. J Surg Res 2013;179:78-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2012] [Revised: 08/08/2012] [Accepted: 08/20/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]

Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 2012;14:39-49. [PMID: 23160803 PMCID: PMC3585906 DOI: 10.1007/s10195-012-0217-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2012] [Accepted: 10/21/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open

Dapuzzo MR, Sierra RJ. Acetabular considerations during total hip arthroplasty for hip dysplasia. Orthop Clin North Am 2012;43:369-75. [PMID: 22819164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]

Yang S, Cui Q. Total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip: Review of anatomy, techniques and outcomes. World J Orthop 2012;3:42-8. [PMID: 22655221 PMCID: PMC3364316 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i5.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2011] [Revised: 02/20/2012] [Accepted: 05/13/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open

Patil N, Hwang K, Goodman SB. Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2012;35:e306-12. [PMID: 22385438 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120222-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]

Abstract

The reconstruction of major acetabular bone defects during revision, conversion, and primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) is challenging. We reviewed a consecutive series of 168 THAs (108 revisions, 8 conversions, and 52 primary THAs) performed by 1 surgeon (S.B.G.) between 1997 and 2008 using impaction bone grafting for acetabular reconstruction. Autograft, cancellous allograft croutons, and demineralized bone matrix were used to fill bone defects as needed. The acetabular bone deficiency was classified according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: type I, segmental deficiency with significant rim defect; type II, cavitary defects medially or posteriorly; type III, combined cavitary and segmental deficiency; type IV, pelvic discontinuity; and type V, arthrodesis. According to this method, 56 hips had type I, 31 hips had type II, 48 hips had type III, and 27 hips had type IV deficiencies. Of the 168 patients, 19 subsequently died of causes unrelated to the THA, and 11 were lost to follow-up. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. Average Harris Hip Score improved from 45.5±17.9 preoperatively to 81.1±16.5 postoperatively (P<.05) for revision THAs, from 40.0±11.3 preoperatively to 85.0±12.8 postoperatively (P<.05) for conversion THAs, and from 42.3±14.9 preoperatively to 85.0±12.0 postoperatively (P<.05) for primary THAs. All impaction grafted bone (allograft, autograft, or a combination) incorporated radiographically, thus restoring bone stock. Complications included 1 early infection, which was managed successfully with debridement and liner exchange, and 2 late infections that were managed successfully with staged revision. Two revisions required subsequent re-revision for late loosening. Two hip dislocations occurred, 1 of which required surgical treatment to place a constrained liner.

Collapse

Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Goto K, Maeno S, Nakamura T. Load dispersion effects of acetabular reinforcement devices used in revision total hip arthroplasty: a simulation study using finite element analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1061-6. [PMID: 21676579 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2011] [Accepted: 04/14/2011] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Sporer SM. How to do a revision total hip arthroplasty: revision of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1359-66. [PMID: 21792504 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.9314icl] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]

Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:562-73. [PMID: 20931308 PMCID: PMC3018199 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1618-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2009] [Accepted: 09/24/2010] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:432-6. [PMID: 19369027 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2008] [Accepted: 03/16/2009] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Lerch M, Thorey F, von Lewinski G, Klages P, Wirth CJ, Windhagen H. An alternative treatment method to restore limb-length discrepancy in osteoarthritis with high congenital hip dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:1593-9. [PMID: 19271228 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0846-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]

Symeonides PP, Petsatodes GE, Pournaras JD, Kapetanos GA, Christodoulou AG, Marougiannis DJ. The Effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twenty-one years' follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:168-74. [PMID: 18534474 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2006] [Revised: 07/13/2007] [Accepted: 10/03/2007] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Minimum ten-year results of a porous acetabular component for Crowe I to III hip dysplasia using an elevated hip center. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:187-94. [PMID: 18534384 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2007] [Accepted: 08/02/2007] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:2482-90. [PMID: 18704610 PMCID: PMC2584278 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0442-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2007] [Accepted: 07/23/2008] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Sembrano JN, Cheng EY. Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:1657-65. [PMID: 18299946 PMCID: PMC2505268 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0183-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2007] [Accepted: 02/05/2008] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

McMinn DJW, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008;90:715-23. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.90b6.19875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]

Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:691-5. [PMID: 18264858 PMCID: PMC2505228 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0079-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2007] [Accepted: 11/12/2007] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Abeyta PN, Namba RS, Janku GV, Murray WR, Kim HT. Reconstruction of major segmental acetabular defects with an oblong-shaped cementless prosthesis: a long-term outcomes study. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:247-53. [PMID: 18280420 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2006] [Accepted: 01/28/2007] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Atilla B, Ali H, Aksoy MC, Caglar O, Tokgozoglu AM, Alpaslan M. Position of the acetabular component determines the fate of femoral head autografts in total hip replacement for acetabular dysplasia. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007;89:874-8. [PMID: 17673578 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.89b7.18417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]

Heller MO, Schröder JH, Matziolis G, Sharenkov A, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN. [Musculoskeletal load analysis. A biomechanical explanation for clinical results--and more?]. DER ORTHOPADE 2007;36:188, 190-4. [PMID: 17333071 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1054-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]

Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, Nakamura T. Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007;89:26-31. [PMID: 17259411 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.89b1.18037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]