An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offers multiple benefits. However, there are concerns about whether old age should be a criterion for exclusion from this protocol. This study aimed to determine the safety and outcomes of ambulatory TKA for patients aged ≥80 years.

A retrospective study was conducted using data from our hospital knee registry database (2021-2024). We compared the length of hospital stay, complication rate, readmission rate, three-month postoperative functional outcomes and overall experiences of patients (aged ≥80 years) who underwent ambulatory TKA with patients (aged ≥80 years) who underwent non-ambulatory TKA and younger patients who underwent ambulatory TKA. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Clinical Score (KSS) and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS). The minimal clinically important difference cutoffs for OKS, KSFS and KSS were 5.0, 6.4 and 5.9, respectively.

There were clinically significant improvements in the three-month postoperative functional scores compared to preoperative scores in all patient groups. Patients aged ≥80 years who underwent ambulatory TKA had lower complication and readmission rates compared to the other patient groups. They also had better three-month postoperative functional scores than patients who underwent non-ambulatory TKA ( P = 0.004 for OKS, P = 0.003 for KSFS), and similar outcomes as younger patients ( P > 0.050 for OKS, KSFS). Length of hospital stay, satisfaction rates and rates of expectation met were comparable between patients aged ≥80 years and younger patients who underwent ambulatory TKA.

In carefully selected patients aged ≥80 years, ambulatory TKA is safe and yields outcomes comparable to those of younger patients.

Surgeons used the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to interrogate outcomes-using patient-reported outcomes-to determine whether a patient can achieve clinical benefit after orthopaedic surgery. However, it is proposed to be crucial to separate the idea of meeting a clinically established threshold of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which could truly predict patient-reported satisfaction with that outcome.

To investigate the association between achieving MCID and patient-reported satisfaction after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with fascia lata autografts for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears.

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

A total of 62 patients with ≥2-year follow-up and receiving questionnaires were included. PROMs were collected pre- and postoperatively, including pain visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. MCIDs were determined using the sensitivity- and specificity-based approaches. Patient-reported satisfaction was evaluated with the following question: "Are you satisfied with your superior capsular reconstruction surgery (yes/no)?" The association between achieving MCID and patient-reported satisfaction was evaluated.

All 3 scores had acceptable area under the curve values (>0.7) for MCID. The MCID values were 4.5, 14.5, and 25.0 for the VAS, ASES, and SANE scores, respectively. Patients achieving MCID for PROMs had significantly greater improvement levels in the other clinical outcome scores than their counterparts (P < .05), except for the VAS score that demonstrated no difference between patients achieving and not achieving the MCID for SANE score (P = .07). Achieving MCID for PROMs was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients feeling satisfied with the outcomes than the group failing to achieve the MCID (all P < .05). However, the percentages of patients who failed to achieve MCID for pain VAS, ASES, and SANE scores reported satisfaction with their results at 63.3%, 54.5%, and 59.1%, respectively.

Achieving MCID thresholds on the VAS, ASES, and SANE scores were predictive of patient-reported satisfaction after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction 2 years postoperatively. However, half of the patients who failed to achieve MCID were still satisfied, regardless of clinical outcome improvements. Surgeons may need to be careful when consulting patients about expected outcomes, and patients need to set reasonable expectations based on their preoperative condition.

Flexion instability (FI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a leading cause of early failure and is typically associated with increased early flexion, pain, swelling, and subjective instability. However, there is a subset of patients who have symptomatic FI with concomitant arthrofibrosis (FI + A). This study compared outcomes in revision TKA cases performed for isolated FI to those performed for FI + A.

A retrospective review was performed on 115 patients who were revised for FI and 20 patients who were revised for FI + A. The surgical technique emphasized the established principles and surgical algorithms for FI. Clinical data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated. The two groups did not differ by demographics (P ≥ 0.207), mean follow-up (P = 0.462), or comorbidities (P ≥ 0.358); however, the FI group had a higher prevalence of uncontrolled depression (28 versus 5%, P = 0.026), although it was not associated with outcomes (P ≥ 0.434).

The two groups did not differ by radiographic metrics (P ≥ 0.117) or PROMs at the latest follow-up or in the change from pre-revision baseline PROMs (P ≥ 0.186). The FI + A group had a greater increase in knee range of motion (ROM) from the pre-revision baseline compared to the FI group (22.5 versus 2.2 degrees, P = 0.015). However, the FI group obtained a higher absolute post-revision ROM (116 versus 103 degrees, P = 0.016).

This study demonstrated no difference in outcomes after revision TKA comparing patients who were revised for FI + A to those revised for isolated FI. However, the FI + A group gained a clinically relevant improvement in post-revision ROM and benefited from revision TKA. Further study is warranted to understand the challenging and often multifactorial diagnosis of FI with concomitant arthrofibrosis.

III.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential adverse effects of prior arthroscopic knee surgery on the prognosis of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other relevant databases up to October 2024. Cohort studies comparing the outcomes of patients with and without previous arthroscopic knee surgery were retrieved. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the differences in postoperative function, complications, and revision rates between the arthroscopy and primary TKA groups.

The analysis included 11 cohort studies comprising a total of 194,367 patients; 13,086 of these patients had a history of knee arthroscopy. The meta-analysis results revealed no significant differences in postoperative range of motion, functional improvement, stiffness, periprosthetic fracture, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and other complications between the groups. However, the arthroscopic group showed a higher risk of postoperative prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). The revision rate was also higher in the arthroscopic group (Relative Risk (RR) 1.423, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.280 to 1.583). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased PJI risk within one year of arthroscopic TKA (RR 1.314, 95% CI 1.156 to 1.493). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results, and Egger's test showed no publication bias.

Prior arthroscopic surgery was not found to have significant impacts on the functional outcomes of TKA but was found to increase the risks of postoperative infection and revision.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has significant advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, due to its need for precise positioning and soft tissue balancing, UKA failures and revision rates may be higher than that of TKA. Robotic-assisted UKA offers more accurate implant positioning, soft tissue balancing, improved lower limb alignment, and a reduction in surgical error. There are few studies studying functional outcomes post robotic-assisted UKA. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between robotic-assisted and conventional medial UKA.

A retrospective review was done of 159 patients; 110 patients underwent conventional UKA while 49 patients underwent robotic-assisted UKA. Outcome measures included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM) at three months, one-year and two years post-UKA.

Pre-operative patient demographics and outcome scores were not significantly different between both groups. ROM was significantly greater in the MAKO compared to the Oxford group at 3 months (p=0.039), 1 year (0.053) and 2 years (0.001) post-operation. While OKS, KSS and VAS scores improved for both groups, there were no significant differences in the final outcome measures. None of the patients experienced a mechanical failure, infection, or revision post-surgery. One patient each in the Oxford and MAKO group suffered a periprosthetic fracture.

Both robotic-assisted MAKO UKA and conventional Oxford UKA showed good clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted MAKO UKA had superior ROM outcomes compared to conventional Oxford UKA up to two years post-surgery.

Achieving proper soft-tissue balance is essential for improving total knee arthroplasty outcomes. This multicenter study aimed to analyze the effects of the gap angle and medial and lateral component gaps on clinical outcomes.

This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on 656 knees in 11 centers. A tensor device was used to measure the joint gap and varus-valgus angle of the joint gap, and medial and lateral component gaps were determined by subtracting the polyethylene thickness. Correlations between the gap angle, component gap, and clinical outcomes using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the new Knee Society Score (2011 KSS) were analyzed.

The varus gap angle in flexion positively correlated with the KSS knee score (r = 0.118, P = 0.0183), KSS function score (r = 0.164, P = 0.0009), 2011 KSS symptoms (r = 0.148, P = 0.0030), and 2011 KSS functional activities (r = 0.129, P = 0.0099). The medial component gap in extension negatively correlated with the KSS function score (r = -0.113, P = 0.0241) and that in flexion negatively correlated with the 2011 KSS symptoms (r = -0.127, P = 0.0078) and the 2011 KSS patient satisfaction score (r = -0.119, P = 0.0126). The lateral component gap had no correlation with clinical outcomes. The valgus gap group in flexion showed poorer clinical outcomes than the severe varus, varus, and/or balanced gap groups. The slightly loose group of the medial component gap in extension showed lower 2011 KSS symptoms (P = 0.0352) and functional activities (P = 0.0085) than that in the tight group.

The valgus joint gap and medial looseness are negatively correlated with clinical outcomes, and residual varus joint gap and lateral laxity can be tolerated. Bone resection and soft-tissue release should be performed carefully to prevent medial looseness.

Cementless fixation for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to increase in the United States. However, compared to cemented TKA, reports on revision rates have been mixed. A confounding variable may include the tibial insert design. This study aimed to assess the minimum 5-year survivorship and outcomes of a cementless TKA using an ultracongruent (UC) articulation.

A consecutive series of 242 cementless TKAs were implanted at two institutions between 2017 and 2019 using an UC kinematic tibial insert. Of the patients, 56% were men. The average age was 60 years. Patients were followed using Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Knee Society clinical and radiographic scores. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were classified according to the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) type. The average follow-up was 5.6 years (range, five to 7.5).

At the final follow-up, KOOS-JR scores averaged 84.0. Knee Society scores averaged 94. Flexion averaged 116°. There were seven manipulations (2.9%), one patella fracture, and no deep infections. There were seven knees (2.9%) revised (three for flexion instability, one for pain, one for femoral fibrous ingrowth, one for distal femur fracture, and one for arthrofibrosis). At 5 years, survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 99.6%. Change in CPAK type did not correlate with final KOOS-JR, pain, University of California Los Angeles activity score, or satisfaction scores.

Cementless TKA using this conforming design has provided excellent clinical results out to 5 years. Once initial component stability is achieved, the UC nature of this articulation does not appear to adversely influence the durability of implant fixation, regardless of whether the CPAK type was changed.

Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to decreased function and patient dissatisfaction. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is often performed to improve range of motion (ROM); however, there is no consensus on indications or timing. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients who underwent MUA versus those with an uncomplicated postoperative course following primary TKA. This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of 116 consecutive patients who underwent MUA from 2013 to 2019 following primary TKA due to stiffness. Indication for MUA was failure to achieve 105 degrees of knee flexion at 6 weeks following surgery. Five patients underwent revision surgery and 15 patients from the MUA group were excluded: 12 lost to follow-up and 3 deaths. The remaining 96 MUA patients were matched to 288 TKAs who did not require MUA or revision, all with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients who underwent MUA were younger (60.7 vs. 66.3 years, p < 0.001) and had less preoperative knee flexion (105.4 vs. 110.7 degrees, p < 0.001). There were five (4.9%) revisions in the MUA group: two instability, two chronic pain, and one arthrofibrosis. There were no differences between the groups with respect to postoperative Knee Society Knee Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Forgotten Joint Score-12, satisfaction, or complications. Satisfaction rates were 88.5% among MUA patients and 89.6% among non-MUA patients (p = 1.0). Patients undergoing MUA following TKA, using the criteria of failure to achieve 105 degrees of flexion by 6 weeks postoperatively, were able to achieve similar PROMs and satisfaction compared with a control group with a low incidence of revision due to persistent arthrofibrosis.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the balance in extension and flexion achievable after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a modified kinematic alignment (KA) plan and the subsequent balance achievable after adjusting the component based on the functional alignment (FA) principle. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA for knee osteoarthritis through an image-based robotic system in a single center between October 2021 and February 2022. Whether modified KA or FA could achieve a balanced knee was evaluated by assessing the ligament balance in the medial and lateral compartments using a robotic system at extension and 90° flexion. Balance was defined as a difference of ≤2 mm between the compartments. Component positioning was adjusted within limits based on the functional positioning principles to achieve balance. Implant positioning and balance in extension and 90° flexion were compared between the modified KA plan (n = 100) and after FA adjustments (n = 100). Results: FA achieved significantly better balance in extension (FA, 99.0% vs. modified KA, 86.0%; p = 0.001) and flexion (98.0% vs. 43.0%; p < 0.001) than the modified KA plan. The mean difference in gap balance in extension (FA, 0.1 mm vs. modified KA, 0.6 mm; p = 0.001) and flexion (0.1 mm vs. 2.3 mm; p < 0.001) was also significant between the two techniques. The femoral component was positioned more externally rotated relative to the transepicondylar axis (FA, 2.5° vs. modified KA, 0.0°; p < 0.001) to obtain balanced targets. There were significant improvements in the patient-reported outcome measures between preoperative and postoperative assessments two years after TKA (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: FA consistently achieved superior balance in both extension and flexion following TKA compared with modified KA without altering the soft tissue envelope, leading to significant improvements in clinical outcomes at the two-year follow-up.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) face infection risk. The study evaluates vancomycin-loaded calcium sulfate bone as infection prevention. Patients with RA treated with TKA who had their femoral canal filled using either vancomycin-loaded calcium sulfate bone (experimental group [n = 35]) or the patient's own excised autologous bone (control group [n = 30]) at the Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital, Qingdao, China from January 1, 2017, to March 1, 2023, were retrospectively enrolled in this study. An experienced surgeon used midvastus approach. Surgeries included disinfection, antibiotics, and femoral filling. The age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and intraoperative details were extracted from the patient's medical records. Preoperation and postoperation markers (C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), pain scale (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), infection rate, and Knee Society Score (KSS) were collected. Groups matched in age, gender, and BMI. No preoperative inflammatory marker differences were observed. However, compared to the control group, the postoperative inflammatory markers were significantly lower in the experimental group at 1-week postsurgery (CRP: 40.80 ± 23.17 vs. 60.80 ± 43.12 mg/L, p = 0.021; ESR: 72.06 ± 17.52 vs. 83.87 ± 21.52 mm/h, p = 0.012) and at 1-month postsurgery (CRP: 15.63 ± 6.56 vs. 21.17 ± 13.16 mg/L, p = 0.032; ESR: 25.25 ± 20.44 vs. 38.40 ± 25.26 mm/h, p = 0.024). There were no significant differences in the VAS (2.79 ± 0.90 vs. 2.70 ± 0.84 score, p = 0.689) and KSS (64.31 ± 17.88 vs. 66.57 ± 12.36) at 1-month postsurgery. Experimental group: zero infections; control group: only one infection. Administering vancomycin and calcium sulfate during TKA in RA patients reduces postoperative inflammation, but does not significantly affect infection risk; further research may be necessary for validation.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) was introduced to provide surgeons with virtual preoperative planning and intraoperative information to achieve the desired surgical goals in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures following primary TKA using RA-TKA vs manual instrumentation.

This was a retrospective cohort review study comparing 393 primary RA-TKAs vs 312 manual TKAs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The same cementless implant design was utilized in all cases at a single institution. There were no significant differences in age or gender between groups. Outcome measures included range-of-motion, Knee Society (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score-12, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and overall patient satisfaction scores along with complications and survivorship.

Compared to manual TKA, the RA-TKA group had significant higher postoperative KSS Function and Knee scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores (P < .001). A total percentage of 95.0% of RA-TKA vs 87.4% of manual TKAs were very satisfied or satisfied (P = .001). Survivorship with all-cause failure as the endpoint at 3 years was 96.9% in the RA-TKA group compared to 95.8% in the manual group (P = .54).

RA-TKA demonstrated significant improvement over manual jig-based instruments in KSS Function, KSS Knee, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and patient satisfaction scores following primary TKA with no differences in complications and revision incidence. RA-TKA provided a virtual 3-dimensional preoperative plan along with intraoperative information for adjustments to approximate the patients' native joint line and achieve a well-balanced soft-tissue sleeve about the knee for primary TKA.

Traditional teaching advocates for routine patella resurfacing (PR) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with inflammatory arthritis. However, evidence on this topic remains limited in the Asian population. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative outcomes and complication of patella resurfacing (PR) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Asian patients with inflammatory arthritis.

A retrospective analysis was conducted using registry data from our institution. Patients with inflammatory arthritis who underwent primary TKA from August 2017 to December 2021 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups - patella resurfaced (PR, n = 25) and non-resurfaced patella (PNR, n = 31) groups. Demographics, operative data, patient reported outcome measures, and complications were compared.

Preoperative range of motion (ROM) (PR:95.3 ± 23.6° vs PNR:105 ± 19.5°, p = 0.106), Knee Society Scoring System Knee score (KS-KS) (PR:44.6 ± 17.4 vs PNR:49.3 ± 17.7, p = 0.331) and Knee Society Function Score (KS-FS) (PR:40.9 ± 27.3 vs PNR:47.7 ± 27.0, p = 0.325) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (PR:25.0 ± 7.8 vs PNR:23.3 ± 10.3, p = 0.525) were similar in both groups. Outcomes between PR and PNR groups at the one-year mark in terms of ROM (PR:112.7 ± 18.1 vs PNR:114.6 ± 16.5, p = 0.455), OKS (PR:41.5 ± 3.9 vs PNR:41 ± 4.7, p = 0.954), KS-KS (PR:84.5 ± 13.2 vs PNR:89.2 ± 9.3, p = 0.095) and KS-FS (PR:73.6 ± 18.3 vs PNR:78.7 ± 19.3, p = 0.173) were also similar. Intraoperative complication (PR:0/25 vs PNR: 3/31 (9.6 %), p = 0.245) and re-operation rates (PR: 1/25 (4 %) vs PNR: 1/31 (3.2 %), p = 0.877) were also similar in both groups.

This study conducted on a mixed Asian population with inflammatory arthritis demonstrated that the one-year postoperative ROM and functional outcomes, complication, and re-operation rates between PR and PNR groups were similar. Hence, routine patella resurfacing on all Asian patients with inflammatory arthritis undergoing TKA may not be necessary.

The use of conforming and congruent bearings in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have rapidly increased due to the benefits of increased stability and the potential for replicating normal knee kinematics. However, limited data exist for these newly available bearings. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a large granular database of primary TKAs using a single conforming bearing design.

A total of 1,306 consecutive primary TKAs performed using a single conforming bearing design (85% cemented and 15% cementless) were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on the latest clinical follow-up. The PROMs and minimal clinically important differences were evaluated. A total of 93% of cases achieved minimum 1-year clinical follow-up (mean 3.5 years; range, 1 to 7), with a subset of 261 cases that achieved minimum 5-year follow-up (mean 5.8 years; range, 5 to 7).

All-cause and aseptic Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were 97.6 (95% CI [confidence interval], 97 to 99) and 98.1% (95% CI, 97 to 99) at 7.0 years. Revision-free survivorship did not differ by cemented or cementless fixation (98 versus 97%, P = .163). All PROM scores significantly improved from preoperative baseline (P < .001), and ≥ 86% of patients achieved minimal clinically important differences for Knee Society pain and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement total scores. A total of 89% of cases reported their knees to 'sometimes or always' feel normal. For cases with minimum 5-year PROMs, 93% were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied.'

Conforming-bearing TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship up to 7.0 years. In addition, PROMs were comparable to other designs reported in the literature. While mid-term (mean 3.5-year) results are promising, long-term data are warranted on survivorship due to potential polyethylene wear in conforming bearings with more surface area in contact with articulating surfaces.

IV.

A robotic system was recently introduced to improve prosthetic alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to determine whether robotic-arm-assisted TKA improves clinical and radiological outcomes when compared to conventional TKA.

One hundred and thirty patients who underwent primary TKA were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial, which was conducted at three hospitals. Five patients were lost to follow-up 6 weeks after surgery. Therefore, 125 participants (63 in the intervention group and 62 in the control group) remained in the final analysis. The primary outcome was the rate at which the mechanical axis of the femur deviated by less than 3° from the mechanical axis of the tibia. This was evaluated by full-length weight-bearing X-rays of the lower limb 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operation times, 6-week postoperative functional outcomes evaluated by the American Knee Society score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), short form-36 (SF-36) health survey results, and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).

At 6 weeks postoperatively, we found that the rate of radiographic inliers was significantly higher in the intervention group (78.7% vs 51.6%; p = 0.00; 95% confidence interval, 10.9% to 43.2%). The operation was significantly longer in the intervention group than in the control group (119.5 vs 85.0 min; p = 0.00). There were no significant differences in the 6-week postoperative functional outcomes, SF-36, AEs, and SAEs between the two groups. There were no AEs or SAEs that were determined to be "positively related" to the robotic system.

Robotic-arm-assisted TKA is safe and effective, as demonstrated in this trial.

The prevalence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) continues to increase exponentially. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to define clinical and quality-of-life improvement and for reimbursement. Temporal trends of preoperative PROMs and specifically how COVID-19 has affected these PROMs is lacking. This study evaluated preoperative PROMs over time, whether medical factors affected preoperative PROMs, and what correlations the COVID-19 pandemic had with these trends in PROMs.

A total of 3,014 patients who underwent primary total hip total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed for covariates and preoperative PROMs. Commonly reported preoperative PROMs were evaluated in univariate and multivariate models.

Preoperative activity level steadily increased from 2015 to 2021 for THAs and steadily increased from 2015 to 2019 for TKAs, followed by a decrease in 2020. Preoperative KOOS JR scores increased from 2016 to 2019 and then decreased in 2020 and 2021. Preoperative knee pain with level walking and climbing stairs steadily increased from 2013 to 2019, with additional increases in 2020. The COVID-19 era was significantly associated with higher activity levels for THAs, higher levels of pain with level walking, and lower KOOS JR scores. Preoperative PROM scores demonstrated correlations with postoperative PROM scores, which differed from that during the COVID era (rho range 0.105 to 0.391) at a mean of 2.0 years postoperatively.

Surgical delays because of COVID-19 were associated with increased preoperative disability as evidenced by lower activity levels. Aside from this pandemic era, patient activity levels increased over time, indicating that modern TJA patients are more active preoperatively and likely to demand higher levels of function after surgery. Additional studies should evaluate the clinical effect of these statistically significant findings. Providers should consider the trends in preoperative PROMs over time when counseling patients on expectations after TJA.

In the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), prior patellectomy historically prompted the use of increased constraint implants, specifically posterior-stabilized (PS) designs. However, modern case series have reported similar outcomes utilizing cruciate-retaining (CR) implants. The primary outcome of this study was to compare implant retention rates between these 2 implant designs in prior patellectomy patients. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of patient-reported outcome scores and cause for revision.

A comprehensive systematic review was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Boolean operator search terms included "patellectomy AND (arthroplasty) OR (replacement)." Case reports, review articles, < 2 years of follow-up, and studies in which the implant design could not be ascertained were excluded. An initial screening of titles and abstracts for inclusion was performed, followed by a full manuscript review of eligible articles. Single-data extraction was performed, followed by subsequent statistical analysis.

A total of 9 studies (209 knees) met the inclusion criteria. The average time from patellectomy to TKA was 16.1 years. While all patients had significant improvement in functional outcomes, CR implants displayed proportionally greater improvement in Knee Society Scores compared to PS implants (+108 versus +98%, P ≤ .001). However, there was a significantly greater rate of revision in the CR cohort compared to PS (18.6 versus 2.6%, P = .002).

Prior patellectomy patients undergoing TKA have significant improvements in patient-reported functional outcomes and high midterm retention rates. While CR implant designs portend a potentially greater improvement in functional outcomes, they also have a greater risk for revision than their PS implant counterparts. However, contemporary implant designs and operative techniques likely render revision rates equivocal between CR and PS implants in postpatellectomy patients.

Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) was designed to improve implant position accuracy by providing surgeons with real-time intra-operative data to tailor the operation to the patient. Proponents of robotic-assisted TKA believe that this translates into meaningful improvements in outcomes. However, there are concerns that the longer surgical duration associated with robotic-assisted TKA leads to longer length of stay (LOS). In this study, the authors investigated the outcome of MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA combined with ERAS protocol to assess its effect on LOS and short-term outcomes.

All patients who had undergone unilateral MAKO® ERAS Day Surgery TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were prospectively followed up and matched to patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day Surgery TKA in the same time period. Factors such as surgical duration, LOS, immediate reduction in pain, 30-days complications, and 6-month PROMs and knee ROM were compared between the two groups.

42 patients underwent MAKO® ERAS Day surgery TKA and were matched to 42 patients who underwent conventional ERAS Day surgery TKA. The study found that despite the longer surgical duration, LOS was comparable between both groups (1.1 ± 0.9days in the MAKO® group vs 1.0 ± 0.3days in the conventional group, p = 0.755) with successful 24-hour discharge in 88.1 % of patients in the MAKO® group. The MAKO® group achieved significantly better ROM compared to the conventional group 6-months post operatively. Post-operative PROMs were comparable between both groups.

ERAS Day Surgery protocol can significantly reduce the LOS of patient undergoing MAKO® Robotic-arm Assisted TKA, conferring cost savings and making it a valid option for patients.

Elective surgeries were postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic to alleviate healthcare strains, affecting majority of elective orthopaedic surgeries such as total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on knee function and quality of life of patients who had their planned TKA postponed due to the pandemic.

This is a retrospective analysis of data collected in a tertiary hospital. Patients included were diagnosed with primary knee osteoarthritis and they were initially scheduled for primary TKA between January to April 2020 but surgery was postponed by at least 6 months from the initial operative date. 160 patients were included in this study (53 males and 107 females, mean age 68.0 ± 8.1). Patients were assessed prior to initial surgery date and assessed again, prior to the postponed surgery date. Clinical scores included Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee scores (OKS) and Short-Form 36 Physical and Mental Component Scores. (SF36 PCS and MCS). Paired T-test was performed for parametric data whereas Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis was performed for non-parametric data.

Comparing initial preoperative versus postponement preoperative scores, the cohort had significantly poorer KSKS (38.4 ± 15.4 and 36.5 ± 15.4, p = 0.034), SF36 PCS (34.3 ± 9.2 and 32.7 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) and OKS (34.9 ± 0.77 and 35.8 ± 8.6, p = 0.02) scores respectively.

The postponement of elective TKAs has resulted in a significant deterioration of knee scores and physical quality of live scores of patients in a short span of 6 months. Further studies can evaluate if there are repercussions on long term TKAs outcomes.

Retrospective study, Level III.

Psychotropic medications are commonly used to treat several mental health conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of psychotropic medications in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with respect to postoperative opioid use, complications, patient-reported outcome measures, and satisfaction.

This is a retrospective cohort study of 514 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA. There were 120 patients (23.3%) who were excluded due to preoperative opioid usage. The remaining 394 patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Of those, 133 (34%) were on psychotropic medications preoperatively and were compared to the remaining 261 (66%) patients who were not on psychotropics. Clinical data, satisfaction, Knee Society (KS) scores, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Index Score, Forgotten Joint Scores, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, postoperative opioid medication usage, and complications were compared.

The study cohort (psychotropic medications) had significantly lower postoperative KS Function, KS Knee, Forgotten Joint Scores, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Index Score compared to the control group. The study group had a lower overall satisfaction score (Likert scale 1 to 5) and a lower percentage of patients either satisfied or very satisfied (4.55 versus 4.79, P < .001; 92.0 versus 97.24%, P = .03, respectively). Postoperative opioid usage was significantly greater in the study group at both 6.4 weeks (range, 4 to 8) and 12-month follow-up (52.76 versus 13.33%, P < .001; 5.51 versus 0.39%, P = .002, respectively). There were no differences in complications and revisions between the groups.

Patients on psychotropic medications should be educated on the risk of increased opioid consumption, diminished satisfaction, and patient-reported outcome measures following primary TKA. Given the large number of patients on psychotropic medications undergoing TKA, additional studies are needed to further improve clinical outcomes in this group.

There is increasing use of Robotic-Assisted (RA) and personalized alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis of this study was that RA TKA would result in fewer soft-tissue releases, and that fewer soft-tissue releases would be associated with improved clinical outcomes.

A retrospective review of an internal company registry was conducted for all primary TKAs performed from Jan 1, 2014, through a database extract date of Nov 4, 2022. These were grouped by whether there was an intentional soft-tissue release performed (STR) during the surgery or not (NSTR) and whether RA was utilized. The incidence of STR was compared between RA-TKAs and those performed with manual instrumentation. Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Society Function Scores (KSFS) were collected at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was performed.

The incidence of STR was significantly lower for RA vs. Manual (43.81% Vs 86.62%, p < 0.0001). The TKAs with NSTR had higher KSFS compared to those with STR at 6 months (84.73 Vs. 77.51, p < 0.0001), 1 year (89.87 Vs. 83.54, p < 0.0001) and 2 years (90.09 Vs. 82.65, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in survivorship, or KSS at any time point. However, the NSTR group had improved KSS pain sub score at 2 years.

The results of this observational, retrospective analysis found that the incidence of soft-tissue release was lower with RA-TKA. Further, regardless of if RA was used, avoiding releases was associated with improved KSFS and KSS pain scores through 2 years post-operatively.

Routine patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. To our knowledge, there are no studies reporting the long-term performance of a cemented biconvex all-polyethylene inlay component implanted at the time of primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to examine the 15-year survivorship and long-term clinical outcomes of this biconvex inlay patella used at our institution.

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected institutional database and identified 2,530 patients who underwent cemented TKA with a single prosthetic design (from 1996 to 2007) where the patella was resurfaced using this cemented biconvex inlay patella. The mean age at surgery was 68 years (range, 29 to 93). The mean body mass index was 33.0 (range, 16.4 to 76.3), with 61.9% women. At the time of analysis, the mean time from surgery was 20.4 years (range, 15 to 26). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate survivorship at 15 years. We analyzed clinical outcomes using 3 patient-reported outcome measures collected prospectively.

The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for all causes as the end point was 97.1% (95% confidence interval 96.1 to 98.1%). The 15-year survivorship with revision surgery for a patella-related complication as the end point was 99.7% (95% confidence interval 99.4 to 1.0). At the final follow-up, patients showed significant improvement in scores for the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (P < .001), and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey physical component (P < .001).

Routine patellar resurfacing using a biconvex inlay patellar component has excellent survivorship and a low rate of complications at 15 years post-TKA.

The preclusion of obese patients from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increasingly been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on UKA at 15-year follow-up.

169 unilateral UKA patients from 2003 to 2007 were followed-up prospectively for at least 15 years. 70 patients were left for analysis after accounting for patient demise, revision surgery and loss to follow-up. 48 of these patients (69%) were in the Control group (BMI <30 kg/m2) and 22 (31%) were in the Obese group (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Patients were assessed before and after operation using the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) component of the Short Form 12. Survivorship analysis was also performed.

Obese patients went through UKA at an earlier age than the non-obese patients (54.7 ± 4.7 years compared to 59.9 ± 7.8 years, p = 0.005). At 2, 10, and 15-year follow-up, both groups achieved clinically significant improvements in outcomes. There was no significant association found between obesity and outcome using multiple linear regression. While propensity matching found PCS improvement at 2 years to be greater in obese patients, no significant association between obesity and 15-year outcome was found. All 13 patients who required revision, underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The overall 15-year survivorship was 74.2% within the obese group and 92.4% within the control group.

Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had poorer 15-year survivorship with greater odds of requiring revision surgery. However, assuming implant survival, obese patients can expect a non-inferior outcome relative to their non-obese counterparts in all patient reported outcome measures 15 years after surgery.

Recent advances in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been driven by a growing focus on evidence-based medicine. This transition is reflected in the critical appraisal of both, the quality of work and the potential impact on the orthopedic community. The purpose of our study was to (1) identify the top 100 most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade and from all-time, and (2) compare methodological rigor of the most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade to articles all-time by level of evidence.

The top 100 cited articles were recorded for manuscripts from the last decade, January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022, and manuscripts from all-time for TKA. We collected authors, year of publication, journal of the article, country of origin of authors, article type (basic science article, clinical research article), level of evidence, methodological index for non-randomized studies score, physiotherapy evidence database scale, and citation density (total citations/years published).

The largest number of studies for all-time TKA (53.0%) and decade TKA (42.0%) were Level III. The average methodological index for non-randomized studies score for comparative studies was 18.7 for all-time TKA and 20.7 for decade TKA (P < .001). The average physiotherapy evidence database score was 6.1 for all-time TKA and 8.1 for decade TKA (P > .05). The highest citation density for all-time TKA was 111 and for past decade was 63. The number of level II studies in TKA increased from 19.0% from all time to 38.0% from the last decade (P < .05).

Our findings of improved methodologies over time reflect positive steps toward evidence-based practice in TKA. A continued focus on producing methodologically sound studies may guide evidence-based clinical decision-making.

This retrospective study was designed to assess two fixed bearing total knee design concepts and their clinical outcomes, particularly in Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Patients were assessed clinically using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Participants completed an FJS-12 and a short form of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-PS). A total of 216 knees -76 with Genesis II and 150 with Vanguard total knee arthroplasties - were included. Patients in the Vanguard group had significantly better postoperative FJS-12 scores (by 10.1 points, p = 0.019). Differences in KSS subscores also reached the level of statistical significance. KOOS-PS did not differ significantly. Statistically significant differences between the two knee designs on FJS-12, KS and FS assessments were revealed, but overall, these differences may not reach the threshold of clinical significance.

Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA) has been proposed as an approach to improve the results of the conventional manual UKA (C-UKA). The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the studies comparing R-UKA and C-UKA in terms of clinical outcomes, radiological results, operating time, complications, and revisions.

The literature search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science) on 20 February 2024 according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were comparative studies, written in the English language, with no time limitations, on the comparison of R-UKA and C-UKA. The quality of each article was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist for Measuring Quality.

Among the 3,669 articles retrieved, 21 studies on 19 series of patients were included. A total of 3,074 patients (59.5% female and 40.5% male; mean age 65.2 years (SD 3.9); mean BMI 27.4 kg/m2 (SD 2.2)) were analyzed. R-UKA obtained a superior Knee Society Score improvement compared to C-UKA (mean difference (MD) 4.9; p < 0.001) and better Forgotten Joint Score postoperative values (MD 5.5; p = 0.032). The analysis of radiological outcomes did not find a statistically significant difference between the two approaches. R-UKA showed longer operating time (MD 15.6; p < 0.001), but reduced complication and revision rates compared to C-UKA (5.2% vs 10.1% and 4.1% vs 7.2%, respectively).

This meta-analysis showed that the robotic approach for UKA provided a significant improvement in functional outcomes compared to the conventional manual technique. R-UKA showed similar radiological results and longer operating time, but reduced complication and revision rates compared to C-UKA. Overall, R-UKA seems to provide relevant benefits over C-UKA in the management of patients undergoing UKA.

Most studies comparing medial pivot to the posterior stabilised (PS) systems sacrifice the PCL. It is unknown whether retaining the PCL in the Medial Congruent (MC) system may provide further benefit compared to the more commonly used PS system. A retrospective review of a single-surgeon's registry data comparing 44 PS and 26 MC with PCL retained (MC-PCLR) TKAs was performed. Both groups had similar baseline demographics. The PS and MC-PCLR groups had similar pre-operative range of motion (ROM) (PS:104º ± 20º vs. MC-PCLR: 101º ± 19º, p = 0.70), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (PS: 27 ± 6 vs. MC-PCLR: 26 ± 7, p = 0.62), and Knee Society Scoring System (KS) Function Score (KS-FS) (PS: 52 ± 24 vs. MC-PCLR: 56 ± 23, p = 0.49). The pre-operative KS Knee Score (KS-KS) was significantly lower in the PS group (PS: 44 ± 14 vs. MC-PLR: 53 ± 18, p < 0.05). At 12-months post-operation, there was significant improvement in all parameters (p < 0.01). Both groups had similar ROM (PS: 115º ± 13º vs. MC-PCLR: 114º ± 10º, p = 0.98), OKS (PS: 41 ± 5 vs. MC-PCLR: 40 ± 4, p = 0.50), KS-FS (PS: 74 ± 22 vs. MC-PCLR: 77 ± 16, p = 0.78), and KS-KS (PS: 89 ± 10 vs. MC-PCLR: 89 ± 10, p = 0.89). The PS group had significant improvement in all parameters from preoperation to 3-month postoperation (p < 0.05), but not from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p ≥ 0.05). The MC-PCLR group continued to have significant improvement from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p < 0.05). Preserving the PCL when using MC may paradoxically cause an undesired additional restrain that slows the recovery process of the patients after TKA. Compared to MC-PCLR, a PS TKA may expect significantly faster improvement at 3 months post operation, although they will achieve similar outcomes at 1-year post operation.

This study explored the safety and efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) together with a Day-surgery protocol on some commonly used selection criteria for expedited discharge after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).

ERAS Day surgery TKA performed between Aug 2020 to July 2021 were included in this study. Discharge within 24 h was considered passing protocol. Complications such as infection, re-admission, and re-operation within 30-days were recorded. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and outcome measures at 6-month post-operatively were analysed between those who were successfully discharged within 24 h and those with prolong admission.

A total of 342 patients were included in the study. 315 patients (92.1 %) were discharged within 24 h s. Inadequately controlled pain was the most common reason for delayed discharge (17.9 %). No statistically significant difference in gender, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Body Mass Index (BMI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) were noted between patients who failed protocol and those who passed. Readmission rate within 30days was 2.6 %. Infection occurred in 5 cases, including 2 prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 2 surgical site infection treated with antibiotics, and 1 pneumonia. No 30-days complication occurred in patients who initially failed ERAS Day-surgery protocol. Binary logistic regression was statistically insignificant on effect of gender, age, CCI, BMI, and ASA on passing protocol or 30-days complications. Propensity score matching of patients with prolong stay of more than 24 h did not demonstrate any difference in 6-month outcome.

Patient characteristics such as gender, age, CCI, BMI, and ASA did not influence successful completion of ERAS Day-surgery protocol. Even if patients were initially enrolled in ERAS Day-surgery protocol but failed to be discharged within 24 h, this did not predispose them to increased 30-days complication or poorer 6-month outcome.

III.

Numerous surgical approaches are being used to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare surgical approaches used in TKA regarding postoperative outcomesat different time points.

We performed a literature search from medical database inception until October 2, 2021. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating patients undergoing TKA and comparing at least 2 surgical approaches regarding early postsurgical clinical outcomes (range of motion [ROM], pain on a visual analog scale, and Knee Society Score [KSS]). We included 33 RCTs in our networks. Using paired and network meta-analysis, we calculated pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs by comparing surgical approaches to the medial parapatellar method.

The subvastus (SV) method performed the best on days 1 (MD = 6.99; CI: 1.08; 12.89), 3 (MD = 8.00; CI: 2.08; 13.92), 4 (MD = 27.01; CI: 18.09; 35.92), and 6 (MD = 27.22; CI: 18.38; 36.07) for ROM improvement. Regarding the decrease in pain, the mini SV approach offered significantly lower pain values on days 1 (MD = -1.98; CI: -2.93; -1.03), 3 (MD = -0.85; CI: -1.49; -0.22), and 7 (MD = -1.90; CI: -2.23; -1.57). The differences decreased as time passed. Furthermore, the SV and mini-SV methods performed the best regarding total, knee and function KSS.

Quadriceps-sparing approaches, especially the SV and mini-SV, are superior to the other approaches in the early postsurgical period, but the differences decrease as time passes.

Body mass index (BMI) cutoffs have been established for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients due to increased risk of medical complications in obese patients. However, evidence-based medical optimization may mitigate risk in these patients. This study examined the influence of BMI on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following primary TKA with specialized perioperative optimization.

Between 2016 and 2020, 1,329 consecutive primary TKAs using standardized perioperative optimization were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into ordinal groups based on BMI in 5 kg/m2 increments (range, 17 to 61). Primary outcomes related to activity level, pain, function, and satisfaction were evaluated. BMI groups ≥35 had significantly lower age, more women, and higher prevalence of comorbidities (P ≤ .004). Mean follow-up was 1.7 years (range, 1 to 5 years).

Each successive BMI group from 35 to ≥50 demonstrated continually greater improvement in pain with level walking and stair climbing (P ≤ .001), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P = .001), and greater satisfaction (P = .007). No patients who had a BMI ≥35 were revised for aseptic loosening, and rates of periprosthetic joint infection were not different between BMI groups (P = 1.000).

Despite being more debilitated preoperatively, patients who had a BMI ≥35 experienced greater improvements in PROMs compared to patients who had lower BMI. Given the significant improvements in PROMs and quality of life in obese patients, with appropriate perioperative optimization, these patients should not be prohibited from having a TKA when appropriately indicated.

III.

Replicating native knee kinematics remains the ultimate goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Technology, such as robotics, provides robust intraoperative data; however, no evidence-based targets currently exist for improved clinical outcomes. Furthermore, some surgeons target a rectangular flexion space in TKA unlike the native knee. This study evaluated the effect of in vivo flexion gap asymmetry on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in contemporary TKA.

In vivo tibiofemoral joint space dimensions were measured during 129 TKAs using a calibrated tension device before and after complete posterior cruciate ligament resection. PROMs were compared based on the final dimensions and the change in flexion gap dimensions at 90° of flexion: (1) equal laxity, (2) lateral laxity, and (3) medial laxity. Groups did not differ by demographics ( P ≥ 0.347), clinical follow-up ( P = 0.134), tibiofemoral alignment ( P = 0.498), or preoperative PROMs ( P ≥ 0.093). Mean follow-up for the cohort was 1.5 years (range, 1-3).

Pain with climbing stairs, pain while standing upright, and knees "always feeling normal" scores were superior for patients with equal or lateral laxity compared with medial laxity ( P ≤ 0.064). Pain with level walking, University of California Los Angeles activity level, KOOS JR, and satisfaction scores also tended to be superior for patients with equal or lateral laxity, although it lacked statistical significance ( P ≥ 0.111).

Results of this study suggest that patients with either an equally tensioned rectangular flexion space or with later-flexion lateral laxity after posterior cruciate ligament resection may achieve superior PROMs. Findings support the clinical benefit of facilitating posterolateral femoral roll back in flexion, which mimics native knee kinematics and further helps define targets for advanced technology.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is becoming more and more popular as a treatment option for advanced knee diseases due to its potential to reduce operator-induced errors. However, the development of accurate prediction models for postoperative outcomes is challenging. This study aimed to develop a nomogram model to predict the likelihood of achieving a beneficial functional outcome. The beneficial outcome is defined as a postoperative improvement of the functional Knee Society Score (fKSS) of more than 10 points, 3 months after RA-TKA by early collection and analysis of possible predictors.

This is a retrospective study on 171 patients who underwent unilateral RA-TKA at our hospital. The collected data included demographic information, preoperative imaging data, surgical data, and preoperative and postoperative scale scores. Participants were randomly divided into a training set ( N =120) and a test set ( N =51). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to screen for relevant factors. Variance inflation factor was used to investigate for variable collinearity. The accuracy and stability of the models were evaluated using calibration curves with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, consistency index and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Predictors of the nomogram included preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle deviation, preoperative 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale score, preoperative fKSS score and preoperative range of motion. Collinearity analysis with demonstrated no collinearity among the variables. The consistency index values for the training and test sets were 0.908 and 0.902, respectively. Finally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.908 (95% CI 0.846-0.971) in the training set and 0.902 (95% CI 0.806-0.998) in the test set.

A nomogram model was designed hereby aiming to predict the functional outcome 3 months after RA-TKA in patients. Rigorous validation showed that the model is robust and reliable. The identified key predictors include preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle deviation, preoperative visual analogue scale score, preoperative fKSS score, and preoperative range of motion. These findings have major implications for improving therapeutic interventions and informing clinical decision-making in patients undergoing RA-TKA.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate functional results, revision-free survival, and the influence of postoperative alignment on outcomes after MCWHTO.

This retrospective study included 27 MCWHTO operated on from 2009 to 2021. Radiographic measurements were performed pre- and postoperatively. The HKA (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle), MPTA (Medial Proximal Tibial angle), LDFA (Lateral Distal Femoral Angle), JLO (Joint Line Obliquity), and JLCA (Joint Line Convergence Angle) were evaluated. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Society (IKS) Function and Knee Score, and the Subjective Knee Value (SKV) as well as revision-free survival were evaluated. Postoperative alignment and its influence on clinical outcomes were also analysed.

The mean follow-up was 61.9 months ± 31.4 (13-124). The HKA, MPTA, and JLCA angles were decreased post-operatively (respectively, Δ = 5.9° ± 2.6, p < 0.001; Δ = 6.1° ± 3.2, p < 0.001 and Δ = 2.5° ± 1.9, p < 0.001). LDFA and JLO were unchanged, post-operatively (respectively, Δ = 0.1° ± 2.2, p = 0.93 and Δ = 1.2° ± 3.3, p = 0.23). Postoperative HKA correlated with knee IKS (R = - 0.15, p = 0.04) and function IKS (R = - 0.44, p = 0.03). Postoperative LDFA correlated with knee IKS(R = 0.8, p < 0.01). Patients with postoperative HKA ≤ 180° had better KOOS (Δ = 12.3, p = 0.04) and IKS function (Δ = 28.1, p < 0.01) than those with HKA > 180°.

Functional results and revision-free survival after MCWHTO are satisfactory when the deformity is located in the proximal tibia. The joint line obliquity is not significantly altered with small tibial correction and, obtaining an overall neutral or slightly varus alignment under the conditions of this study allowed an improvement in the postoperative clinical scores. The literature is still inconclusive on the ideal alignment for valgus deformities and larger series are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

IV, case series.

This study describes the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with day-surgery protocol to assess the outcome of ERAS day surgery TKA compared with traditional ERAS inpatient TKA in terms of length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from August 2020 to July 2021 were followed up. All TKAs were performed with the ERAS protocol. Patients who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria were offered day-surgery protocol: (1) ASA ≤ 3; (2) agreeable for discharge home. In addition, this day-surgery protocol comprised the following: (i) on-call physiotherapy review; (ii) home visit by physiotherapist at 1 week postoperative; (iii) home visit by nurse at 2 weeks postoperative. Day surgery was defined as discharge within 24 h. Patients were followed up for 6 months and PROMs, postoperative complications, and re-admissions recorded.

A total of 738 patients were included (342 ERAS day surgery, 396 ERAS inpatient). 92.4% of patients in the day-surgery group were successfully discharged within 24 h, leading to a shorter mean LOS of 1.13 days compared with 4.12 days in the inpatient group (P < 0.005). Both groups achieved significant and comparable improvement in Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical and Mental component of Short Form-36. Both groups had similar rate of 30-day readmission and complications.

Patients who underwent ERAS day surgery TKA achieved similar functional and quality of life improvement compared with ERAS inpatient TKA with no increased complication rate. ERAS day surgery TKA is safe and cost effective, and its use should be promoted.

To systematically review the literature on the association between knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and clinical outcome after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial knee osteoarthritis and summarize the KJLO cut-off value used when studying this association.

A systematic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) on September 2022, updated on February 2023. Eligible studies describing postoperative KJLO in relation to clinical outcome after HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis were included. Nonpatient studies and conference abstracts without full-text were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed title, abstract and full-text based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The modified Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of each included study.

Of the seventeen studies included, three had good methodological quality, thirteen fair quality, and one had poor quality. Conflicting findings were shown on the associations between postoperative KJLO and patient-reported outcome, medial knee cartilage regeneration, and 10-year surgical survival in sixteen studies. Three good-quality studies found no significant differences in lateral knee cartilage degeneration between postoperative medial proximal tibial angle > 95° and < 95°. Joint line orientation angles by the tibial plateau of 4° and 6°, joint line orientation angle by the middle knee joint space of 5°, medial proximal tibial angles of 95° and 98°, and Mikulicz joint line angle of 94° were KJLO cut-off values used in the included studies.

Based on current evidence, the actual association between postoperative KJLO and clinical consequences after HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis cannot be ascertained. The clinical relevance of KJLO after HTO remains controversial.

IV.

One issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is management of preoperative flexion contracture, which may be associated with poor functional outcome.

The aim of this study was to compare functional results in TKA with or without preoperative flexion contracture, treated according to a standardized algorithm of tissue release and bone cut.

A single-center retrospective case-control study was performed on prospectively collected data for the period 1987-2016. Patients with >10̊ flexion contracture were assigned to the "contracture" group and associated to a selected control group at a ratio of 1:4. Clinical analysis used pre and post-operative International Knee Society (IKS) scores. The significance threshold was set at p<0.05.

Eight hundred and forty-nine cases and 3,304 controls were included, comprising a total of 2,838 male and 1,315 female participants. Mean preoperative extension deficit was 13̊±6̊ in the contracture group and 1̊±2̊ in controls. Preoperative IKS total and functional scores were significantly poorer in the contracture group (38±18 and 54±20) than in controls (52±16 and 59±19) (p<0.001). Postoperatively, the two groups did not significantly differ in IKS functional score (77±22 vs. 79±21, p=0.143). There were differences in IKS knee score (87±12 vs. 88±13, p=0.006) and maximal flexion (114̊±14̊ vs. 119̊±13̊, p<0.0001) that were statistically, but not clinically, significant.

A systematic standardized algorithm for surgical treatment of flexion contracture during primary total knee arthroplasty provided clinical outcomes similar to those of patients without preoperative flexion contracture.

III; case-control study.

Patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for patients, surgeons, and payers in the current healthcare climate. Morbidly obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >40) have demonstrated higher incidence of complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and can have difficulty obtaining access for their surgical care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PROMs and patient satisfaction in morbidly obese patients undergoing primary TKA.

A total of 75 patients with BMI >40 kg/m² undergoing robotic-assisted TKA were retrospectively identified and matched 2:1 to a consecutive cohort of patients with BMI <35. The average BMI of the study cohort was 42.4 kg/m² (39.5-51.3) compared to 28.6 kg/m² (18.5-34.9) in the control group. Clinical outcomes, PROMs, and patient satisfaction were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

The patients of the BMI >40 cohort were less likely to be discharged home (P = .0076), had less active flexion at 2 years (P = .0046), and had worse knee scores at 2 years (0.0497). Despite this, the percentage of patients who were satisfied or very satisfied after surgery was similar between the groups (87.5% vs 91.2%, P = .1943).

Morbidly obese patients are less likely to be discharged directly to home and may have functional differences after primary TKA. However, morbidly obese patients have similar PROMs and are as satisfied as nonobese patients at 2 years. Morbidly obese patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis should also be able to enjoy the benefits of primary TKA following medical and surgical optimization.

Revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) is a technically demanding procedure for failed primary TKA. Posterior-stabilized (PS) and constrained condylar knee (CCK) articulations are commonly used for RTKA, but comparison of these articulations in RTKA is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare survival rates and clinical outcomes of RTKAs using PS articulation and CCK articulation.

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 86 RTKAs (PS, n = 41; CCK, n = 45) with a mean follow-up of 9.15 ± 2.79 years. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society Score, and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at final follow-up. The survival rate of each group was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox-hazard progression model.

Clinical outcomes were improved in both groups without significant difference. Twelve patients had orthopedic complications (4 in PS group and 8 in CCK group). Eight of them underwent re-RTKA (3 in PS group and 5 in CCK group). The articulation design did not influence the failure. The estimated 10-year survival rate was 92.7% in the PS group and 88.2% in the CCK group with no significant difference (p = 0.60). Also in septic failure, there was no significant difference in survival rate (92.7% in PS group and 92.5% in CCK group, p = 0.87). The hazard ratio in the PS group was not significantly different (p = 0.607).

In RTKA, both PS and CCK showed similar survival rates and clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.2 years. Implant articulation did not affect the outcomes when properly indicated.

The use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with preoperative synovitis is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association between synovitis detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prognosis after UKA.

Synovitis was graded using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score criteria based on preoperative MRI findings of 132 UKAs performed between June 2020 and August 2021. The Knee Society Knee Score (KS-KS) and the Knee Society Function Score were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The relationship between synovitis and the changes in the Knee Society score was analyzed using logistic regression.

Univariate logistic regression showed that patients with higher preoperative synovitis scores (odds ratio (OR) = 1.925, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.482-2.500, P < 0.001) had higher KS-KS changes. After adjusting for confounding variables, synovitis was proven to be an independent factor for KS-KS improvement after UKA in multivariate logistic regression (OR = 1.814, 95% CI: 1.354-2.430, P < 0.001). Before UKA, patients with synovitis had lower pain scores (PS) than patients without synovitis (95% CI: -17.159 - -11.160, t = -9.347, P < 0.001). There was no difference in PS between the two groups after UKA (95% CI: -6.559 - 0.345, t = -1.782, P = 0.077).

Patients with synovitis can achieve good improvement of pain symptoms, and the efficacy is not inferior to that of non-synovitis patients after UKA.

Advanced technologies, like robotics, provide enhanced precision for implanting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components; however, optimal component position and limb alignment remain unknown. This study sought to identify sagittal and coronal alignment targets that correlate with minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

A total of 1,311 consecutive TKAs were retrospectively reviewed. Posterior tibial slope (PTS), femoral flexion (FF), and tibio-femoral alignment (TFA) were measured radiographically. Patients were grouped based on whether they achieved multiple MCIDs for PROM scores. Classification and regression tree machine learning models were utilized to identify optimal alignment zones. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 1 to 11).

The change in PTS and postoperative TFA were most predictive for achieving MCIDs in 90% of the models. Approximating native PTS within 4° correlated with MCID achievement and superior PROMs. Preoperative varus and neutral aligned knees were more likely to meet MCIDs and superior PROM scores when not overcorrected into valgus postoperatively (≥ 7°). Preoperative valgus aligned knees correlated with MCID achievement when postoperative TFA was not overcorrected into substantial varus (<0°). Albeit less impactful, FF ≤ 7° correlated with MCID achievement and superior PROMs regardless of preoperative alignment. Sagittal and coronal alignment measurements had moderate to strong interactions in 13 of 20 models.

Optimized PROM MCIDs correlated with approximating native PTS while maintaining similar preoperative TFA and incorporating moderate FF. Study findings demonstrate interactions between sagittal and coronal alignment which may optimize PROMs, highlighting the importance of three-dimensional implant alignment targets.

Given the improved accuracy of robot-assisted surgery, robotic-arm assisted functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty (RFA-TKA) aims to preserve the native pre-arthritic knee biomechanics, to achieve balanced flexion-extension gaps. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the implant position and short-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RFA-TKA vs. mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty with manual technique (MA-TKA).

A prospectively collected database was reviewed retrospectively for patients who underwent primary TKA. Sixty patients who underwent RFA-TKA between February 2020 and July 2020 were included in the RFA-TKA group. Sixty patients who underwent MA-TKA were included via 1:1 matching for age, sex, and body mass index based on the RFA-TKA group. For radiological evaluation, knee X-rays were used to assess the functional knee phenotype and implant position accuracy by measuring the coronal and sagittal alignment, and these measurements were compared between the two groups. Patient demographic characteristics and patient-reported outcomes including Knee Society scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and forgotten joint score-12 were compared between the groups.

Statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative 2-year clinical outcomes in favor of RFA-TKA group which showed greater accuracy in the tibial component sagittal alignment than MA-TKA (1.0 ± 2.3 vs. 0.7 ± 1.6, respectively; P < 0.001). However, outliers in the component positions were more common in the MA-TKA group, which was statistically significant for the femoral coronal and tibial sagittal alignments (P = 0.017 and 0.015, respectively).

Functional alignment in TKA could be accurately obtained with the assistance of a robotic arm, and the results showed greater 2 year postoperative patient-reported outcome and satisfaction than mechanically aligned TKA using manual instruments.

III.

The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a target value on a patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) scale beyond which patients deem themselves to have attained an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to define the PASS thresholds for generic and knee-specific PROMs at 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Prospectively collected data of 955 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis at a single institution was reviewed. Patients were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS). Responses to an anchor question assessing patients' overall rating of treatment results were dichotomized and used to determine if PASS was achieved. PASS thresholds for each PROM were selected based on the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Sensitivity analyses were performed for different subgroups (by age, gender, BMI), baseline score tertiles and an alternate definition of PASS.

In total, 92.7% reported their current state as acceptable. The areas under the curve (AUC) for ROCs were 0.72-0.83, except for the SF-36 PCS (AUC 0.64), indicating good discriminative accuracy of the other PROMs. PASS thresholds were 85.5 for KSKS, 77.5 for KSFS, 41.5 for OKS, 49.9 for SF-36 PCS and 54.6 for SF-36 MCS. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the thresholds were robust. Patients who attained a PASS were at least 4-5 times more likely to be satisfied and have expectations fulfilled.

PASS thresholds can be used to define treatment success in future outcome studies. At the individual level, they provide clinically relevant benchmarks for surgeons when assessing postoperative recovery.

III.

To our knowledge, no papers have reported the results of robotic-assisted surgery for sequential bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Indeed, sequential bilateral TKA present several benefits, as one single anesthesia, surgical episode, hospitalization, and rehabilitation. The purpose of our study was to evaluate peri-operative outcomes and compare the complication rates, clinical outcomes, and implant positioning of sequential bilateral TKA performed with a robotic-assisted system versus a conventional technique.

All patients who underwent a sequential bilateral robotic-assisted primary TKA (raTKA) in our institution between November 2019 and February 2021 were included. Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria and were matched with 20 sequential bilateral TKA performed with a conventional technique. The two groups were comparable for the demographic data and the preoperative parameters, including preoperative anticoagulation and ASA score. The minimum follow-up was 6 months.

The operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group (< 0.0001), with a mean additional time of 29 min. There was no significant difference between both groups for postoperative blood loss, rate of blood transfusion, or postoperative pain. The average length of stay was 5 days. There was one early complication in the robotic group due to the tibial trackers. The functional outcomes were similar between both groups, except for the functional KSS score, which was better at 6 months in the robotic group (p < 0.0001). The restoration of the knee alignment and the distal femoral anatomy were significantly better in the robotic group than in the conventional group.

Despite a longer operative time, the peri-operative parameters of sequential bilateral TKA were similar between robotic and conventional techniques. Further, sequential bilateral raTKA was at least as safe as a conventional technique, without additional risk of medical complications.

The purpose of this study was to (1) longitudinally compare the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the same patients who underwent primary TKA and revision TKA, and (2) compared the results of these revision TKA with a matched cohort of well-functioning primary TKA. The hypothesis was revision TKA could result in equivalent outcomes to patients' own primary TKA or the primary TKA of patients who did not require revision.

Prospectively collected data of 123 patients who underwent primary TKA and subsequently aseptic revision TKA ("revised group"), were matched using nearest-neighbor method to 123 well-functioning primary TKA that did not require revision ("control group"). Preoperative (prior to primary TKA), at time of failure (prior to revision TKA), postoperative 6-month and 2-year PROMs included Knee Society scores (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment was analyzed. Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used to compare outcomes within the revised group (primary vs revision), Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-Square test for the revised and control groups.

The revised group had poorer KSS objective (p = 0.045), KSS functional (p < 0.001), OKS (p = 0.011) and SF-36 PCS (p < 0.001) at time of failure (prior to revision TKA), compared to their preoperative PROMs (prior to primary TKA). Revision TKA resulted in restoration of KSS objective, OKS and SF-36 PCS (NS) that were equivalent to their primary TKA, but poorer KSS functional (p < 0.050). Patients in the revised group had a lower proportion of MCID attainment in KSS objective (p = 0.014) and OKS (p < 0.001) at 2-year after primary TKA when compared to the control group. Revision TKA also led to poorer KSS objective, KSS functional and SF-36 PCS (p < 0.050) when compared to primary TKA of the control group.

Outcomes following aseptic revision were equivalent to patients' own pre-failure state but inferior to patients with non-revised implants. An individualized approach toward goal setting and assessing adequacy of aseptic revision TKA can be adopted based on patients' pre-failure outcomes.

III.

Existing evidence estimates a twofold risk of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) if tourniquet is applied during total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, this estimate relies on multiple trials with a low number of patients analyzing VTEs as a secondary outcome. We hypothesized that tourniquet-use increases the risk of symptomatic VTE within 90 days of contemporary primary TKA and aimed to use the extensive Danish healthcare registries to quantify this risk.

Prospectively collected registry data from Danish patients receiving primary TKAs between 2014 and 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided by tourniquet-use during surgery. By merging information from four nationwide registries, the study included 44 baseline characteristics with the potential to confound the association between tourniquet-use and VTE. Incidence rate and odds ratios were used to compare the risk of VTE within 90 days of surgery.

19,804 patients of whom 10,111 (51%) were operated with tourniquet and 9693 (49%) without were included. The mean age (SD) was 70 (9) in both groups and 62% were females in the tourniquet group compared with 61% in the no tourniquet group. The groups were similarly comparable across all other baseline characteristics except type of post-operative thromboprophylaxis, type of anaesthesia, implant fixation, and year of surgery. The 90-days incidence of VTE was 0.77% (95% CI 0.60-0.94) in the tourniquet group compared with 1.10% (95% CI 0.90-1.31) in the no tourniquet group. Following adjustment for the unbalanced confounders, the odds ratio for VTE was 0.77 (95% CI 0.54-1.10) associated with tourniquet-use.

In contemporary TKAs the rate of VTE within 90 days is low and not significant altered by tourniquet-use. Thus, tourniquet can safely be applied during primary TKA-surgery without jeopardizing the risk of postoperative VTE.

II-prospective cohort study.

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity.

A total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up.

Preoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135).

In contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up.

III.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) is an alternative surgical treatment method to conventional total knee arthroplasty (COTKA) that may deliver better surgical accuracy. However, its impact on patient outcomes is uncertain. The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is to evaluate whether RATKA could improve functional and radiological outcomes compared with COTKA in adult patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee.

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to identify published RCTs comparing RATKA with COTKA. 2 reviewers independently screened eligible studies, reviewed the full texts, assessed risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and extracted data. Outcomes were patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and mechanical alignment (MA) deviation and outliers, and complications.

We included 12 RCTs involving 2,200 patients. RATKA probably results in little to no effect on patient-reported outcomes (mean difference (MD) in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score of -0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.78 to 0.07) and range of motion (MD -0.73°; CI -7.5° to 6.0°) compared with COTKA. However, RATKA likely results in a lower degree of MA outliers (risk ratio 0.43; CI 0.27 to 0.67) and less deviation from neutral MA (MD -0.94°; CI -1.1° to -0.73°). There were no differences in revision rate or major adverse effects associated with RATKA.

Although RATKA likely results in higher radiologic accuracy than COTKA, this may not be clinically meaningful. Also, there is probably no clinically important difference in clinical outcomes between RATKA and COTKA, while it is as yet inconclusive regarding the revision and complication rates due to insufficient evidence.