BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Control Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2026; 17(10): 125453
Published online Oct 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.125453
Table 1 Baseline demographics and significant clinical characteristics (n = 200), n (%)
Variable
Overall (n = 200)
Stage I (n = 68)
Stage II (n = 65)
Stage III (n = 22)
Stage IV (n = 45)
P value
Age (years)52.9 ± 16.451.2 ± 15.454.3 ± 19.356.1 ± 12.452.0 ± 15.00.532
Gender0.727
    Female88 (44.0)27 (39.7)32 (49.2)10 (45.5)19 (42.2)
    Male112 (56.0)41 (60.3)33 (50.8)12 (54.5)26 (57.8)
Histological Dx0.034a
    Adenocarcinoma129 (64.5)43 (63.2)38 (58.5)20 (90.9)28 (62.2)
    Others71 (35.5)25 (36.8)27 (41.5)2 (9.1)17 (37.8)
Histological grade0.001b
    Well47 (23.5)14 (20.6)18 (27.7)6 (27.3)9 (20.0)
    Moderate48 (24.0)13 (19.1)14 (21.5)5 (22.7)16 (35.6)
    Poorly47 (23.5)9 (13.2)14 (21.5)10 (45.5)14 (31.1)
    Atypical58 (29.0)32 (47.1)19 (29.2)1 (4.5)6 (13.3)
H. pylori (histology)0.042a
    Positive130 (65.0)36 (52.9)48 (73.8)17 (77.3)29 (64.4)
    Negative70 (35.0)32 (47.1)17 (26.2)5 (22.7)16 (35.6)
Survival status< 0.001b
    Deceased65 (32.5)15 (22.1)17 (26.2)10 (45.5)23 (51.1)
    Under treatment82 (41.0)15 (22.1)36 (55.4)11 (50.0)20 (44.4)
    Cured53 (26.5)38 (55.9)12 (18.5)1 (4.5)2 (4.4)
Table 2 Prevalence and association of Helicobacter pylori virulence markers, n (%)
Marker
Gastric cancer positive (n = 159)
Controls (n = 200)
Odds ratio
95%CI
P value
cagA131 (82.4)40 (20.0)18.710.9-32.3< 0.001b
vacA148 (93.1)74 (37.0)22.911.6-45.2< 0.001b
babA117 (73.6)33 (16.5)14.18.6-23.2< 0.001b
iceA58 (36.5)32 (16.0)3.011.84-4.94< 0.001b
Table 3 Distribution of virulence factor accumulation by clinical stage, n (%)
Virulence factor accumulation
Stage I (n = 50)
Stage II (n = 54)
Stage III (n = 18)
Stage IV (n = 37)
P value
1 gene5 (10.0)2 (3.7)0 (0.0)5 (13.5)
2 genes5 (10.0)4 (7.4)5 (27.8)8 (21.6)
3 genes34 (68.0)36 (66.7)13 (72.2)19 (51.4)
4 genes6 (12.0)12 (22.2)0 (0.0)5 (13.5)0.045a
Table 4 Fold induction of Helicobacter pylori virulence genes relative to healthy controls (n = 159)
Clinical stage
cagA
vacA
babA
iceA
Stage I3.113.155.680.83
Stage II4.812.901.802.35
Stage III4.534.060.670.68
Stage IV4.262.411.590.52
Table 5 Relative mRNA expression of Helicobacter pylori virulence factors by tumor-node-metastasis stage (n = 159)
Virulence gene
Stage I median (IQR)
Stage II median (IQR)
Stage III median (IQR)
Stage IV median (IQR)
P value
cagA1.93 (1.04-3.36)3.20 (1.51-5.98)3.80 (1.57-6.49)3.11 (1.09-6.20)< 0.001b
vacA2.06 (1.36-3.48)2.42 (1.41-3.92)3.13 (1.85-3.91)1.79 (1.12-3.20)< 0.001b
babA4.11 (1.62-5.41)1.39 (1.03-2.11)0.57 (0.30-1.11)1.19 (0.54-1.72)< 0.001b
iceA0.63 (0.39-0.94)0.86 (0.46-3.17)0.54 (0.40-0.91)0.65 (0.30-1.41)0.027a
Table 6 Spearman correlation matrix of virulence factor expression
Gene
cagA
vacA
babA
iceA
cagA1.000.310.08-0.18
vacA0.311.000.22-0.06
babA0.080.221.00-0.03
iceA-0.18-0.06-0.031.00
Table 7 Multivariate ordinal logistic regression parameter estimates (n = 159)
Predictor/threshold
(β)
Std. Error
z-statistic
P value
OR
95%CI
babA-0.6240.107-5.814< 0.001b0.5360.428-0.654
iceA-0.2210.085-2.5850.010a0.8020.675-0.945
cagA0.0730.0471.5440.1231.0760.981-1.182
vacA0.0090.0910.0950.9241.0090.843-1.205
Stage I|II-2.3680.441-5.376< 0.001b--
Stage II|III-0.4720.393-1.2010.230--
Stage III|IV0.1760.3890.4520.651--
Table 8 Model selection and comparison statistics
Model specification
Log-likelihood
AIC (lower is better)
Model χ2
P value
Univariate (cagA)-207.67423.333.300.069
Toxigenic axis (cagA + vacA)-207.17424.344.290.117
Full multivariate panel-181.50377.0155.63< 0.001b
Table 9 Stage-associated transcriptional signature validation and correlation analysis (n = 159)
Parameter/variable
Spearman (ρ)
P value
VIF
ROC-AUC (95%CI)
Directional trend/validation
babA-0.467< 0.001b1.050.702 (0.632-0.795)Downregulation
iceA-0.1330.1551.000.584 (0.540-0.717)Variable
cagA0.1220.1261.050.612 (0.453-0.645)Upregulation
vacA-0.0100.2101.100.528 (0.457-0.647)Neutral
Combined model (apparent, full-cohort)ρ = 0.494< 0.001b1.020.769Linear fit
Combined model (Nested 5-fold CV)---0.747 (0.664-0.823)Calibration: Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 5.53, df = 3, P > 0.05
5-fold cross-validation (Cauchit)----Accuracy: 0.535; Kappa: 0.325
CART - decision tree (apparent, full-cohort)---0.867Sensitivity: 74.5%; specificity: 81.7%
CART - decision tree (Nested 5-fold CV)---0.68 (95%CI: 0.59-0.77)Sensitivity: 54.5%; specificity: 75.0%


Write to the Help Desk