Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 24, 2021; 12(12): 1169-1181
Published online Dec 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i12.1169
Table 1 Techniques for circulating tumour cell isolation, markers, and their limitations
No.
Name
Property
Markers
Limitations
Ref.
1CellSearchIsolation by anti-EpCAM antibody coated immunomagnetic beadsEpCAM, CKs, CD45, DAPIOnly suitable for cancer of epithelial origin but not for that undergoing the EMT[48]
Cells are not viable after detection
2AdnaTestSeparation by way of anti-EpCAM and anti-MUC1 antibody coated immunomagnetic beadsEpCAM, MUC1, mucin-1, HER2Possible false-positive finding due to expression of a selection marker being present in other cells other than CTCs[49]
Cells are not viable after detection
3MACSImmunomagnetic CTC enrichment by antibodies against cell surface markersCK19, EpCAM, Her-2, MUC-1 CK7, CK8, CK18, CK19Lengthy processing time and low sensitivity[50]
4MagSweeper (Illumina Inc)Immunomagnetic isolation of CTC by antibodies against EpCAM and cellsurface markersEpCAM, CD45, DAPILess sensitive during the early stages of tumour development[51]
Captured cells are viable with intact RNA
5CTC ChipUtilizes bifurcating traps to capture CTCs, release via flow reversalEpCAM, CKs, CD45, DAPIIdentification of CTCs is lower than other methods[52]
6GEM chipGeometrically enhanced mixing chip structure that allows enhanced capture of CTC on antibody coated surfacesEpCAM, DAPI, CD45, cytokeratinLow sensitivity [53]
7Onco Quick (Greiner BioOne, Frickenhausen, Germany)Separation of erythrocytes and some leukocytes from CTC. High sensitivity, QuantificationCCNE2, DKFZp762E1312, EMP2No morphology confirmation; not really capture CTCs[54]
8ISET (Rarecells Diagnostics)Rapid processing; non-antigen dependent; Filter based approachCKs, EGFR, VE-cadherin, Ki67Size-dependent, manual processing[55]
9EPISPOTRemoves leukocytes via CD45 depletionCD45, CK19, mucin-1, cathepsin-DProblem arises when antigen levels are lower or binding efficiency is reduced[56]
Can detect viable CTCs
10Ficoll + RT-PCRSeparation of CTC based on size dependent enrichment. High SensitivityCK-19, HER2, h-MAM, CEA, maspin, GABA A, B726PNo morphology confirmation[57]
11Cyttel MethodNegative immune-magnetic selection of WBC (CD45 antibody)-High detection rateCD45-[58]
12MetaCellSize-based enrichment and separation for viable CTCsCK-18, -19, -20, CK-7, EPCAM, MUC1, HER2, EGFRLengthy processing time[59]
Table 2 Studies showing postoperative isolation of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer–markers, techniques, and clinical implications
No.
Technology
Markers
Number of patients
TNM stage
Correlation
Clinical significance
Ref.
1CellSearch systemEpCAM164I-IIIWith stage N/A[60]
EpCAM24IV With therapy responseMay be used in monitoring response to therapy[61]
EpCAM97IIWith stageCorrelates with stage [62]
CD133+, CD54+, CD44+15 (nmCRC); 95 (mCRC)I-IV≥ 5 CTCs were 8 times more likely to develop distant metastasis. CTC counts show good correlation with colorectal neoplasmIndependent prognostic marker for nmCRC[63]
hTERT, CK19, CK20, CEA438I-III-Poor relapse free survival[64]
hTERT, CK19, CK20, CEA157I-IIIWith stagePoor relapse free survival and overall survival[65]
Survivin, CK20 and CEA156I-IIIWith stages (Duke’s) and lymph node metastasis.Useful as an adjunct in detection of CRC patients[66]
CD133, CEA, CK20, CK19,197II-IIICEA/CK/CD133 expression and stage (Duke’s)Prognostic significance (Duke's stages B and C)[44]
hTERT, CK-19, CK-20, CEA, GAPDH and mRNA72I-IVCEA, mRNA: With stage, vascular invasion, and postoperative metastasisPrognostic and predictive [67]
2Flow-cytometry with immunofluorescenceCTCs18I-IIIWith stage and also detected in an early cancer stage.Predictive [68]
3Pyrosequencing KRAS (Codon 12/13)26IVNo associationPrognostic [69]
4MetaCell separation methodCTCs98I-IVCTC-positive in 83%Prognosis and predictive [70]
CTC-negative in 17%
5Mag SweeperPIK3CA242-Mutational discordance found between CTCs, DTCs, and metastases, and among CTCs; DTCs from this patient propagated in vitro contained a PIK3CA mutationInvestigating new drug therapies[71]
6CTC-ChipEpCAM, HER2, and EGFR--Efficiency of 87.5%In situ protein expression, and culture CTCs from the same set of cells[72]
Table 3 Circulating tumour cells in metastatic vs non-metastatic colorectal cancer
No.
Type of CRC
Markers used
Detection method used
Relevance
Clinical implications
Limitations of the study
Ref.
1nmCRCCEA, CA19-9, CA72-4CyttelDiagnostic/prognostic/predictiveCombination of CTCs and CEA: Diagnostic and prognostic indicatorsSmall sample size, weak power of the study[73]
2mCRCCK, CD45Immunomagnetic separation Prognostic/predictiveThe number of CTCs before and during treatment is an independent predictor of PFS and OS in patients with mCRCThe baseline unfavourable CTC was low (26%) and overall CTC yield was less than in other epithelial cells[74]
3mCRCALDH1, CD44, CD133, MRP5, SurvivinqRT-PCRPrognosticPoor prognosis and chemo therapy non-responsivenessRequire further molecular analyses of CTCs for selection of targeted agents[75]
Survivin and MRP5 selection of mCRC patients resistant to 5-FU and L-OHP
4mCRCCEACyttel method, immunofluorescence in situ hybridization technologies (imFISH)PrognosticPFS, OSSmall sample size[6]
Lack of dynamic enumeration of CTCs
5mCRCVEGF, CD133+, CD34+/KDR + EPC, CD-34-VEGFR2Flow cytometry/IHCPrognosticTreatment response; PFS, OS-[76]
6nmCRCCD133, CD166, CD44, EpCAM, ALDH1Tissue microarray, IHCPrognosticNo association with poor clinical response; OSTreatment information was missing (local recurrence, distant metastasis, and postoperative therapy)[77]
7nmCRCCK19, MUC1, CD44, CD133, ALDH1Flow-cytometry, CellSearch, Cytomorphology, qPCRPrognosticMay be useful as a therapeutic target; PFS, OS-[78]