Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Nov 24, 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
Table 1 Patient characteristics, n (%)
RTCh
Ch
P value
(n = 40)
(n = 27)
Age 60 (54-67)67 (62-73)0.32
Gender0.29
Male26 (65)21 (77.8)
Performance status0.21
ECOG 07 (17.5)5 (18.5)
ECOG 133 (82.5)20 (74.1)
ECOG 202 (7.4)
Smoking habit0.48
Yes20 (50)15 (55.6)
No2 (5)3 (11.1)
Former smoker18 (45)9 (33.3)
Tumor localization0.33
Apex7 (17.5)1 (3.7)
Right upper lobe13 (32.5)13 (48.1)
Right lower lobe 6 (15)2 (7.4)
Left upper lobe12 (30)9 (33.3)
Left lower lobe2 (5)2 (7.4)
Histology0.28
Adenocarcinoma25 (62.5)20 (74.1)
Squamous13 (32.5)6 (22.2)
NSCLC101 (3.7)
Large cell2 (5)0
Stage0.52
IIIA27 (67.5)21 (77.8)
IIIB12 (30)6 (22.2)
IV1 (2.5)0
T0.08
T14 (10)9 (33.3)
T216 (40)9 (33.3)
T310 (25)7 (25.9)
T410 (25)2 (7.4)
N0.04
05 (12.5)0
234 (85)27 (100)
31 (2.5)0
Metastasis1 (2.5)00.59
Nodal station distribution0.012
N06 (15)0
1N212 (30)19 (70.4)
2N22 (5)1 (3.7)
1N2 + 1N113 (32.5)7 (25.9)
2N2 + 1N15 (12.5)0
1N1 + 1N2 + 1N32 (5)0
Nodal staging method0.68
EBUS24 (60)14 (51.9)
Mediastinoscopy2 (5)3 (11.1)
EBUS and mediastinoscopy8 (20)6 (22.2)
EUS1 (2.5)2 (7.4)
None5 (12.5)2 (7.4)
Table 2 Chemotherapy regimens, n (%)
RTCh
Ch
(n = 40)
(n = 27)
Cisplatin-Etoposide19 (47.5)0
Cisplatin-Vinorelbine14 (35)6 (22.2)
Cisplatin-Pemetrexed4 (10)3 (11.1)
Cisplatin-Docetaxel06 (22.2)
Cisplatin-Gemcitabine02 (7.4)
Carboplatin-Vinorelbine3 (7.5)1 (3.7)
Carboplatin-Paclitaxel06 (22.2)
Carboplatin-Pemetrexed01 (3.7)
Carboplatin-Gemcitabine02 (7.4)
Table 3 Radiological response, n (%)
RTCh
Ch
P value
(n = 40)
(n = 27)
Disease progression 1 (2.5)4 (14.8)0.025
Stable disease14 (35)14 (51.9)
Partial response25 (62.5)8 (29.6)
Complete response01 (3.7)
Table 4 Surgery characteristics, n (%)
RTChCh
P value
(n = 40)
(n = 27)
No surgery5 (12.5)6 (22.2)
Type of surgery0.48
Lobectomy21 (60)16 (76)
Bilobectomy3 (8.6)1 (4.8)
Pneumonectomy2 (5.7)1 (4.8)
Lobectomy and vascular reconstruction1 (2.8)1 (4.8)
Lobectomy and rib resection5 (14.3)1 (4.8)
Lobectomy with rib resection and vertebrectomy3 (8.6)0
Segmentectomy with rib resection and vertebrectomy01 (4.8)
Node level dissection0.26
2N2 + 1N14 (11.4)3 (14.3)
3N22 (5.7)5 (23.7)
3N2 + 1N112 (34.3)7 (33.3)
3N2 + 2N15 (14.3)3 (14.3)
4N2 + 1N18 (22.9)1 (4.8)
4N2 + 2N101 (4.8)
4N2 + 1N32 (5.7)0
5N2 + 1N12 (5.7)1 (4.8)
Table 5 Pathological response, n (%)
RTCh
Ch
P value
(n = 40)
(n = 27)
No surgery5 (12.5)6 (22.2)
Pathological complete response6 (17.1)1 (4.8)0.23
Tumor response10.001
0%-10%19 (54.4)2 (9.5)
11%-30%9 (25.7)2 (9.5)
31%-50%4 (11.4)3 (14.3)
51%-70%2 (5.7)6 (28.6)
> 70%1 (2.8)8 (38.1)
Nodal response10.001
0%-10%30 (85.7)7 (33.3)
11%-30%1 (2.8)0
31%-50%2 (5.7)3 (14.3)
51%-70%02 (9.5)
> 70%2 (5.7)9 (42.9)
Downstaging28 (80)7 (33.3)0.002
Table 6 Univariate analysis investigating the impact of neoadjuvant therapy radiochemotherapy on the response

OR
95%CI
P value
Radiological response
Disease progressionReference
Stable disease40.39-40.420.240
Partial response12.51.21-128.610.035
Complete responseNA1
Pathological tumor response
0%-10%Reference
11%-30%0.4740.05-3.920.489
31%-50%0.140.17-1.13 0.065
51%-70%0.030.004-0.300.002
> 70%0.010.001-0.160.001
Pathological nodal response
0%-10%Reference
11%-30%0.4740.057-3.920.489
31%-50%0.140.17-0.130.065
51%-70%0.030.004-0.300.002
> 70%0.010.001-0.160.001
Downstaging
NoReference
Yes82.34-27.320.001

  • Citation: Muñoz-Guglielmetti D, Sanchez-Lorente D, Reyes R, Martinez D, Lucena C, Boada M, Paredes P, Parera-Roig M, Vollmer I, Mases J, Martin-Deleon R, Castillo S, Benegas M, Muñoz S, Mayoral M, Cases C, Mollà M, Casas F. Pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC-contribution of IASLC recommendations. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i11/1047.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047