Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2019; 10(8): 283-292
Published online Aug 24, 2019. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i8.283
Table 1 The clinical and treatment characteristics of the patients (n = 173)
Characteristicsn (%)
AJCC 2010 T stage
T13 (2)
T2a74 (43)
T2b14 (8)
T2c16 (9)
T3a49 (28)
T3b17 (10)
Gleason score (median)7 (3-9)
Initial PSA (median)14 ng/dL (2-100 ng/dL)
D’Amico risk group
Intermediate52 (30)
High121 (70)
Perineural invasion
Absent103 (60)
Present56 (32)
Unknown14 (8)
Percent positive core biopsy percentage
≤ 50 %76 (44)
> 50%59 (34)
Unknown38 (22)
Radiotherapy dose
736 Gy145 (84)
76 Gy16 (16)
Table 2 Multivariate analysis for independent predictors of biochemical failure free survival
P valueHR95%CI for HR
LowerUpper
LHRHa type0.7570.00.01.24E+19
D'Amico risk group (ref: intermediate)0.3971.50.63.89E+00
AJCC 2010 T stage (ref: T1)0.953
T2a0.9092869.30.02.85E+62
T2b0.9151646.50.01.64E+62
T2c0.9122150.30.02.14E+62
T3a0.912583.90.02.57E+62
T3b0.9083108.00.03.10E+62
Gleason score (ref: ≤ 6)0.799
70.9321.00.51.99E+00
80.5641.30.62.71E+00
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for two cut-off values of castrate testosterone levels
AUCSEP valueSensitivitySpecificity
Castrate level testosteron (≤ 20)0.6280.0490.01163.6%62.0%
Castrate level testosteron (< 50)0.5820.0520.10731.8%84.5%
Table 4 Comparison of studies analyzing the effect of castrate testosterone levels in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation treatment and definitive radiotherapy
Bryant et al[15]Nabid et al[16]Current study
Time2000-20152000-20101998-2011
Patient number764796173
Hormone treatmentADT+/- AAADT+/- AAADT+AA
Follow up (yr)5.279.1510.4
RT doseUnknownUnknown73.4-76 Gy
RT techniqueUnknownUnknown3DCRT-IMRT
Biochemical relapse rate
< 20 ng/dL18.3% (10 yr)20.8%17% (10 year)
20-49 ng/dL28.1% (10 yr)24.9%35% (10 year)