Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 10, 2017; 8(3): 293-299
Published online Jun 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.293
Figure 1
Figure 1 The characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients at our hospital. A total of 34 patients were diagnosed with PNETs. Among these patients, 21 had specimens that underwent Ki-67 immunostaining. There were 13 PNET G1 patients, and the observation period was more than six months long for eight PNET G1 patients. PNET: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; G1: Grade 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2 The patient who exhibited growth of the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. A: Abdominal CT. Initial CT indicated a PNET. The lesion was identified in the pancreatic tail. The diameter of the PNET was 34 mm (arrow); B: The lesion grew slightly after 11 mo; C: The lesion grew further after 29 mo; D: The diameter of the tumor became larger than 70 mm after 79 mo; E: The patient underwent distal pancreatectomy after 80 mo; F: Hematoxylin and eosin stain (× 100). Tumor cells formed ribbon-like lines; G: Chromogranin A staining (× 200). Tumor cells were chromogranin A positive; H: The Ki-67 index was 0.9%, with tumor grade G1 (× 200). PNET: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; CT: Computed tomography.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor case followed up without surgery. A: Abdominal CT. A tumor was recognized in the pancreatic body. The diameter of the lesion was 8 mm; B: Endoscopic ultrasonography. The tumor was recognized as a low echoic lesion. A 22G needle was inserted into the tumor; C: Hematoxylin and eosin stain (× 400). Spindle-shaped tumor cells with ellipse nuclei formed funicular lines; D: Chromogranin A staining (× 400). Tumor cells were chromogranin A-positive; E: The Ki-67 index was < 1.0% (× 200), with tumor grade G1; F: Abdominal CT. The tumor did not grow after 54 mo. PNET: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; CT: Computed tomography.