Lymph node yield (LNY) is a validated quality control parameter in colorectal cancer surgery, with >12 nodes reflecting an adequate oncological resection. No formal guidelines exist in the context of central and lateral compartment lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). This study aimed to investigate the association between LNY and regional recurrence in PTC patients, and to define a threshold LNY that indicates adequate compartmental lymphadenectomy.

A retrospective analysis of patient data (1992-2022) was conducted using "The University of Sydney Endocrine Surgery Unit" database. Patients undergoing either prophylactic or therapeutic dissection of the central compartment or therapeutic dissection of the lateral compartment for PTC were included. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between nodal yield and local recurrence.

On multivariate analysis, a central LNY ≤3 was an independent adverse prognostic factor for central recurrence (odds ratios [OR] 2.19, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.15-4.17, and p = 0.018) and a lateral LNY ≤20 was independently predictive of lateral recurrence (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.24-5.31, and p = 0.007).

This study highlights the association between LNY and local recurrence in PTC. Our findings suggest that minimum LNY thresholds (>3 for central and >20 for lateral) may serve as indicators of adequate dissection. Further research should validate these findings across healthcare centers.

The widespread use of neck US and other imaging modalities has contributed to a phenomenon of increased detection of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Most of these cancers remain indolent, without requiring surgical intervention. Nonetheless, a subset of patients who require surgical treatment experience subsequent disease recurrence. This most commonly occurs in the cervical lymph nodes and thyroid bed, followed by distant metastasis to the lungs and bones. Because imaging is an integral part of postoperative surveillance, radiologists play a central role in the detection of recurrent tumors and in guiding treatment in these patients. US is the primary imaging modality used for postoperative evaluation. Other modalities such as CT, MRI, radioactive iodine imaging, and PET/CT aid in the accurate diagnosis and characterization of recurrent disease. Therefore, radiologists must have a thorough understanding of the utility of these imaging techniques and the imaging characteristics of recurrent DTC when interpreting these multimodality studies. The interpretation of imaging findings should also be correlated with the clinical status of patients and their biochemical markers to minimize interpretative errors. The authors present a broad overview of the postoperative evaluation of DTC, including its initial primary management, staging, and prognostication; clinical risk stratification for recurrent disease; postoperative surveillance with imaging and evaluation of biochemical markers; and management of recurrent DTC. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. While there has been no appreciable increase in the observed mortality of well-differentiated thyroid cancer, there has been an overall rise in its incidence worldwide over the last few decades. Patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and clinical evidence of central (cN1) and/or lateral lymph node metastases require total thyroidectomy plus central and/or lateral neck dissection as the initial surgical treatment. Nodal status in PTC patients plays a crucial role in the prognostic evaluation of the recurrence risk. The 2015 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) have more accurately determined the indications for therapeutic central and lateral lymph node dissection. However, prophylactic central neck lymph node dissection (pCND) in negative lymph node (cN0) PTC patients is controversial, as the 2009 ATA guidelines recommended that CND "should be considered" routinely in patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for PTC. Although the current guidelines show clear indications for therapeutic CND, the role of pCND in cN0 patients with PTC is still debated. In small solitary papillary carcinoma (T1, T2), pCND is not recommended unless there are high-risk prediction factors for recurrence and diffuse nodal spread (extrathyroid extension, mutation in the BRAF gene). pCND can be considered in cN0 disease with advanced primary tumors (T3 or T4) or clinical lateral neck disease (cN1b) or for staging and treatment planning purposes. The role of the preoperative evaluation is fund-amental to minimizing the possible detrimental effect of overtreatment of the types of patients who are associated with low disease-related morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, it determines the choice of appropriate treatment and determines if close monitoring of patients at a higher risk is needed. Thus, pCND is currently recommended for T3 and T4 tumors but not for T1 and T2 tumors without high-risk prediction factors of recurrence.

Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) consist of 95% of thyroid tumors and include papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), and Hurthle cell thyroid cancer (HTC). Rates of lymph node metastases are different depending on histologic subtypes and <5% in FTC and between 5% and 13% in HTC. Lymph node metastasis is more frequent in PTC and while rate of clinical metastasis can be seen approximately 30% rate of routine micrometastasis can be seen up to 80%. Lymph node metastasis of DTC mostly develops first in the Level VI lymph nodes at the central compartment starting from the ipsilateral paratracheal lymph nodes and then spreading to the contralateral paratracheal lymph nodes. Spread to the Level VII is mostly after Level VI invasion. Subsequent spread is to the lateral neck compartments of Levels IV, III, IIA, and VB and sometimes to the Levels IIB and VA. Occasionally skip metastasis to the lateral neck compartments develop without spreading to the central compartments and this situation is more frequent in upper pole tumors. Although application of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in DTC increases the rate of complication, due to its unclear effects on oncologic results and quality of life, the interest to the pCND is decreasing and debate on its surgical extent is increasing. pCND is not essential in DTC and characteristics of patient and tumor and experience of surgeon should be considered when deciding for pCND. Due to lower complication rate of one sided pCND compared to bilateral central neck dissection (CND), low possibility of contralateral central neck metastasis and low risk of recurrence, application of one-sided CND is logical. Although therapeutic CND (tCND) is the standart treatment when there is a clinically involved lymph node, extent of dissection is a matter of debate. A case-based decision for the extent of tCND can be made by considering patient and tumor characteristics and experience of the surgeon. Due to the higher complication risk of bilateral CND, unilateral tCND can be performed if there is no suspicious lymph node on the contralateral side and bilateral tCND can be applied when there is a suspicion for metastasis only on the contralateral side or there are features for risk of metastasis to the contralateral side. In patients with clinical central metastasis owing to intra-operative pathology results by frozen section procedure are compatible with post-operative pathology results, when there is a suspicion for contralateral metastasis, a decision for one- or two-sided dissection can be made using frozen section procedure. In DTC, it can be stated that there is a consensus in the literature about not performing prophylactic lateral neck dissection (LND), but performing therapeutic LND (tLND). In addition, there is a debate on the extent of tLND. In a meta-analysis about lateral metastasis, the rates of metastasis to the Levels IIA, IIB, III, IV, VA, and VB were 53.1%, 15.5%, 70.5%, 66.3%, 7.9%, and 21.5%, respectively. Ultrasonography (USG) is an effective procedure for detection of cervical nodal metastasis on lateral compartment. Pre-operative imaging with USG and/or combination with the fine needle aspiration biopsy (cytology/molecular test/Thyroglobulin test) can allow pre-operative detection and verification of lateral lymph node metastasis. Extent of tLND can be determined to minimize morbidity considering pre-operative USG findings, pre-operative tumor and clinical features of lateral metastasis. Especially in the presence of limited lateral metastases, limited selective LND such as Levels III, IV or Levels IIA, III, IV can be applied according to the patient. Levels IIB and VB should be added to the dissection in the presence of metastases in these regions. In cases that increase the risk of Level IIB involvement, such as presence of metastasis at Level IIA, extranodal tumor involvement, presence of multifocal tumor, and in cases that increase the risk of Level VB involvement such as macroscopic extranodal spread, and simultaneous metastases at Levels II, III, IV; Levels IIB and VB can be added to dissection material. Levels I and VA should be added to the dissection in the presence of clinically detected metastases.

Thyroid cancer, as the most prevalent endocrine malignancy, comprises nearly 1% of all cancers in the world. The metastatic propagation of thyroid cancer is under the control of a number of modulating processes and factors such as signaling pathways and their components, cell division regulators, metabolic reprogramming factors, extracellular matrix remodelers, epithelial to mesenchymal transition modulators, epigenetic mechanisms, hypoxia and cytokines. Identifying the exact molecular mechanisms of these dysregulated processes could help to discover the key targets for therapeutic purposes and utilizing them as diagnostic, prognostic and predictors of the clinical course of patients. In this review article, we describe different aspects of thyroid cancer metastasis by focusing on defective genes and pathways involved in its metastatic spread.

Threshold numbers for defining adequacy of lymph node (LN) yield have been determined for evaluation of occult nodal disease during papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) surgery. This study assesses the prevalence of adequate LN yield and estimates its association with patient clinicopathologic characteristics.

Adult patients with cN1 pT1b or pT2 and cN0 or cN1 pT3 M0 PTC ≥1 cm who received surgery with ≥1 LN resected were identified from the National Cancer Database, 2004-2015. Adequate yield was defined as removing ≥6, 9, and 18 LNs for pT1b, pT2, and pT3 stages, respectively, based on recently published literature. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine factors associated with adequate yield.

A total of 23,131 patients were included; 7544 (32.6%) had adequate LN yield. Rate of adequate yield increased from 19.9% to 36.6% over time. After adjustment, patients at academic facilities were more likely to have adequate yield than those at community centers [OR 1.94 (95% CI 1.55-2.41), P < 0.001]. Patients with more advanced tumors were less likely to have adequate yield (pT1b: 75.9% versus pT2: 64.5% versus pT3: 24.6% adequate LN yield, P < 0.001). Patients with adequate LN yield were 0.89 times likely to receive radioactive iodine compared with those with inadequate yield [OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.81-0.98), P = 0.02].

The rate of adequate LN yield has increased over time, but only a minority of lymphadenectomies performed for PTC can be defined as adequate. Disparities still exist based on patient and facility characteristics; patients with more advanced tumors appear less likely to have adequate LN yield.

Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas arising from the follicular epithelial cells and forming differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consist of >95% of thyroid cancers. Lymph node metastasis to the neck is common in DTC, especially in papillary thyroid cancer. The removal of only the metastatic lymph nodes (berry picking) does not help to achieve a potential positive contribution to the survival and recurrence of lymph node dissection in the DTC. Thus, systematic dissection of the cervical lymph nodes is needed. Today, according to the widely accepted and commonly used definitions and lymph node staging, the deep lymph nodes of the lateral side of the neck are divided into five regions. Based on the fact that some groups have biologically independent regions, Groups I, II, and V are divided into the A and B subgroups. The central region lymph nodes contain VI and VII region lymph nodes, which consist of the prelaryngeal, pretracheal, and right and left paratracheal lymph node groups. Radical neck dissection (RND) is accepted as the standard basic procedure in defining neck dissections. In this method, in addition to all the regions of the Groups I-V lymph nodes at one side, the ipsilateral spinal accessory nerve, internal jugular vein, and sternocleidomastoid muscle are removed. Sparing of one or more of the routinely removed non-lymphatic structures in the RND is called modified RND (MRND), whereas the preservation of one or more of the routinely removed lymph node groups in the RND is termed as selective neck dissection (SND). In difference, the procedure with an addition of a lymph node and/or non-lymphatic structures to routinely removed neck structures in RND is called extended RND. Generally, involving one or more regions of SND are applied for DTC. The removal of the paratracheal, prelaryngeal, and pretracheal lymph node groups at one side is termed as ipsilateral central dissection, whereas the removal of the bilateral paratracheal lymph node groups, in other words, the excision of four lymph node groups in the central region (Groups VI and VII), is defined as bilateral central dissection. In conclusion, bilateral central neck dissection (CND) is the SND in which the regions of VI and VII are removed. In the DTC, CND is prophylactically and therapeutically applied, whereas lateral neck dissection is performed only therapeutically in the presence of clinical metastasis (N1b) in the lateral neck region. Debates on the extent of SNDs to be made in the central and lateral neck regions are still ongoing. Central dissection should be made at least unilaterally. In the lateral side of the neck, SNDs can be applied in different combinations in which at least one region from Groups I to V is removed. The main variables that determine the extent of SND in the central and lateral regions in DTC are the complication rates, the effect of the procedure, and its effect on prognosis and recurrence.