1
|
Simone CB, Amini A, Chetty IJ, Choi JI, Chun SG, Donington J, Edelman MJ, Higgins KA, Kestin LL, Mohindra P, Movsas B, Rodrigues GB, Rosenzweig KE, Rybkin II, Shepherd AF, Slotman BJ, Wolf A, Chang JY. American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria Systematic Review and Guidelines on Reirradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Executive Summary. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025:S0360-3016(25)00259-7. [PMID: 40185207 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2025] [Accepted: 03/15/2025] [Indexed: 04/07/2025]
Abstract
Definitive thoracic reirradiation can improve outcomes for select patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with locoregional recurrences. To date, there is a lack of systematic reviews on safety or efficacy of NSCLC reirradiation and dedicated guidelines. This American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria Systematic Review and Guidelines provide practical guidance on thoracic reirradiation safety and efficacy and recommends consensus of strategy, techniques, and composite dose constraints to minimize risks of high-grade/fatal toxicities. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review assessed all studies published through May 2020 evaluating toxicities, local control and/or survival for NSCLC thoracic reirradiation. Of 251 articles, 52 remained after exclusions (3 prospective) and formed the basis for recommendations on the role of concurrent chemotherapy, factors associated with toxicities, and optimal reirradiation modalities and dose-fractionation schemas. Stereotactic body radiation therapy improves conformality/dose escalation and is optimal for primary-alone failures, but caution is needed for central lesions. Concurrent chemotherapy with definitive reirradiation improves outcomes in nodal recurrences but adds toxicity and should be individualized. Hyperfractionated reirradiation may reduce long-term toxicities, although data are limited. Intensity modulated reirradiation is recommended over 3D conformal reirradiation. Particle therapy may further reduce toxicities and enable safer dose escalation. Acute esophagitis/pneumonitis and late pulmonary/cardiac/esophageal/brachial plexus toxicities are dose limiting for reirradiation. Recommended reirradiation composite dose constraints (2 Gy equivalents): esophagus V60 <40%, maximum point dose (Dmax) < 100 Gy; lung V20 <40%; heart V40 <50%; aorta/great vessels Dmax < 120 Gy; trachea/proximal bronchial tree Dmax < 110 Gy; spinal cord Dmax < 57 Gy; brachial plexus Dmax < 85 Gy. Personalized thoracic reirradiation approaches and consensus dose constraints for thoracic reirradiation are recommended and serve as the basis for ongoing Reirradiation Collaborative Group and NRG Oncology initiatives. As very few prospective and small retrospective studies formed the basis for generating the dose constraint recommended in this report, further prospective studies are needed to strengthen and improve these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Arya Amini
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | | | - J Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephen G Chun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Martin J Edelman
- Fox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Larry L Kestin
- Michigan Healthcare Professionals Radiation Oncology Institute/GenesisCare, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Annemarie F Shepherd
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Wolf
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Joe Y Chang
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mayo CS, Appelt AL, Paradis KC, Dawson LA, Andratschke N, Vasquez Osorio EM, Bentzen SM, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Marks LB, Yom SS. Joining Forces to Advance Reirradiation: Establishing the Reirradiation Collaborative Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025:S0360-3016(25)00139-7. [PMID: 40088225 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2025] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 03/17/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, and Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Kelly C Paradis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eliana M Vasquez Osorio
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester & The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ellen D Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sue S Yom
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sahin A, Romano E, Casutt A, Moeckli R, Vallet V, El Chammah S, Ozsahin M, Kinj R. Stereotactic Lung Re-Irradiation After a First Course of Stereotactic Radiotherapy with In-Field Relapse: A Valuable Option to Be Considered. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:366. [PMID: 39941736 PMCID: PMC11815762 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2024] [Revised: 01/20/2025] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated high local control rates for inoperable early-stage lung cancers. However, 5-15% of patients experience local relapse within the irradiated volume after treatment, with limited curative salvage options. The aim of this review is to clarify the modalities and outcomes after a second course of SBRT in patients with local relapse after a previous lung SBRT. METHODS An exhaustive literature review was conducted to identify, analyse and summarise the results of 21 main studies. RESULTS Local repeat lung SBRT after a first course of SBRT showed a favourable local control at 1 and 2 years, ranging from 70 to 90% and 45 to 80%, respectively. Good overall survival rates were also observed at 1 and 2 years reaching up to 95% and 85%, respectively. Toxicity was rare but could be severe, with cases of Grade 4 and 5 toxicities (≈5%). An important dose relationship was observed between re-irradiation dose levels and local control, highlighting the importance of precise dosing. The cumulative doses impacting organs at risk were similarly associated with increased radiation-induced toxicity. Central lung lesions presented a higher risk for severe side effects compared to peripheral ones. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, repeat lung SBRT after a first course of SBRT represents a feasible treatment option in cases of local recurrence. In order to limit severe toxicity, patients must be carefully selected, and particular attention should be given to cumulative doses to organs at risk, as well as tumour location. Thus, further investigations are still needed to refine the optimal parameters for SBRT lung re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assim Sahin
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Edouard Romano
- Department of Oncology, Radio-Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alessio Casutt
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Division of Pulmonology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Véronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Shaïma El Chammah
- Radio-Oncology Service, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, 1847 Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Mahmut Ozsahin
- Radio-Oncology Service, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, 1847 Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Rémy Kinj
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Radio-Oncology Service, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parisi S, Ferini G, Lillo S, Brogna A, Chillari F, Ferrantelli G, Settineri N, Santacaterina A, Platania A, Leotta S, Casablanca G, Russo A, Pontoriero A, Adamo V, Minutoli F, Bottari A, Cacciola A, Pergolizzi S. Stereotactic boost on residual disease after external-beam irradiation in clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer: mature results of stereotactic body radiation therapy post radiation therapy (SBRTpostRT) study. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023:10.1007/s11547-023-01659-w. [PMID: 37294366 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01659-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered after external-beam fractionated irradiation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with clinical stage III A, B. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (60-66 Gy/30-33 fractions of 2 Gy/5 days a week) with or without concomitant chemotherapy. Within 60 days from the end of irradiation, a SBRT boost (12-22 Gy in 1-3 fractions) was delivered on the residual disease. RESULTS Here we report the mature results of 23 patients homogeneously treated and followed up for a median time of 5.35 years (range 4.16-10.16). The rate of overall clinical response after external beam and stereotactic boost was 100%. No treatment-related mortality was recorded. Radiation-related acute toxicities with a grade ≥ 2 were observed in 6/23 patients (26.1%): 4/23 (17.4%) had esophagitis with mild esophageal pain (G2); in 2/23 (8.7%) clinical radiation pneumonitis G2 was observed. Lung fibrosis (20/23 patients, 86.95%) represented a typical late tissue damage, which was symptomatic in one patient. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 27.8 (95% CI, 4.2-51.3) and 56.7 months (95% CI, 34.9-78.5), respectively. Median local progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months (range 11.6-22.4), with a median distant PFS of 18 months (range 9.6-26.4). The 5-year actuarial DFS and OS rates were 28.7% and 35.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We confirm that a stereotactic boost after radical irradiation is feasible in stage III NSCLC patients. All fit patients who have no indication to adjuvant immunotherapy and presenting residual disease after curative irradiation could benefit from stereotactic boost because outcomes seem to be better than might be historically assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ferini
- REM Radioterapia Srl, Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Catania, Italy
| | - Sara Lillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
- Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
| | - Anna Brogna
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. "G. Martino", Messina, Italy
| | - Federico Chillari
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giacomo Ferrantelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Minutoli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Bottari
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alberto Cacciola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rodríguez De Dios N, Navarro-Martin A, Cigarral C, Chicas-Sett R, García R, Garcia V, Gonzalez JA, Gonzalo S, Murcia-Mejía M, Robaina R, Sotoca A, Vallejo C, Valtueña G, Couñago F. GOECP/SEOR radiotheraphy guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:237-266. [PMID: 35582651 PMCID: PMC9052073 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i4.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease accounting for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Only 17% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Treatment is multidisciplinary and radiotherapy plays a key role in all stages of the disease. More than 50% of patients with NSCLC are treated with radiotherapy (curative-intent or palliative). Technological advances-including highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, new immobilization and respiratory control systems, and precision image verification systems-allow clinicians to individualize treatment to maximize tumor control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Novel therapeutic regimens such as moderate hypofractionation and advanced techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have reduced the number of radiotherapy sessions. The integration of SBRT into routine clinical practice has radically altered treatment of early-stage disease. SBRT also plays an increasingly important role in oligometastatic disease. The aim of the present guidelines is to review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of localized, locally-advanced, and metastatic NSCLC. We review the main radiotherapy techniques and clarify the role of radiotherapy in routine clinical practice. These guidelines are based on the best available evidence. The level and grade of evidence supporting each recommendation is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Núria Rodríguez De Dios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain
- Radiation Oncology Research Group, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institution, Barcelona 08003, Spain
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona 08003, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thoracic Malignancies Unit, Hospital Duran i Reynals. ICO, L´Hospitalet de L, Lobregat 08908, Spain
| | - Cristina Cigarral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Spain
| | - Rodolfo Chicas-Sett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASCIRES Grupo Biomédico, Valencia 46004, Spain
| | - Rafael García
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Virginia Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida 25198, Spain
| | | | - Susana Gonzalo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Mauricio Murcia-Mejía
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan de Reus, Reus 43204, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Rogelio Robaina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida 25198, Spain
| | - Amalia Sotoca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Carmen Vallejo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - German Valtueña
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza 50009, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid 28223, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid 28003, Spain
- Department of Clinical, Universidad Europea, Madrid 28670, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Toxicity of Proton Therapy versus Photon Therapy on Salvage Re-Irradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12020292. [PMID: 35207579 PMCID: PMC8876714 DOI: 10.3390/life12020292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the toxicity associated with radiation techniques on curative re-irradiation (re-RT) in patients with thoracic recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From 2011 to 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 63 patients with salvage re-RT for in-field or marginal recurrence of NSCLC at two independent institutions. Re-RT techniques using X-ray beams and proton beam therapy (PBT) were also included. Re-RT had a 2-year overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival of 48.0% and 52.0%, respectively. Fifteen patients experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity after re-RT. The complication rates were 18.2% (4/22) and 26.8% (11/41) in PBT patients and X-ray patients, respectively. Airway or esophageal fistulas occurred in seven patients (11.1%). Fistulas or severe airway obstruction occurred in patients with tumors adjacent to the proximal bronchial tree and esophagus, who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemotherapy, and with a higher dose exposure to the esophagus. In conclusion, salvage re-RT was feasible even in patients with local recurrence within the previous RT field. PBT showed similar survival outcomes and toxicity to those of other techniques. However, thoracic re-RT should be performed carefully considering tumor location and RT regimens such as the fraction size and concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Stirling RG, Chau C, Shareh A, Zalcberg J, Fischer BM. Effect of Follow-Up Surveillance After Curative-Intent Treatment of NSCLC on Detection of New and Recurrent Disease, Retreatment, and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:784-797. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.1622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
8
|
Hunter B, Crockett C, Faivre-Finn C, Hiley C, Salem A. Re-Irradiation of Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:124-132. [PMID: 33610269 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Locoregional recurrence occurs in 10%-30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. Re-irradiation is the main curative-intent treatment option for these patients; however, it represents a therapeutic challenge for thoracic radiation oncologists. Re-irradiation practices are variable worldwide with lack of agreement on the optimal dose or the cumulative maximum dose acceptable for critical organs. The role of re-irradiation in NSCLC is also not clearly defined in the era of immunotherapy. In this review, we will present published and on-going re-irradiation studies for recurrent NSCLC. We will appraise available evidence for critical organ dose constraints and provide a framework for future therapeutic approaches and trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cathryn Crockett
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Corrinne Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Crispin Hiley
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ahmed Salem
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Circulating Exosomal miR-96 as a Novel Biomarker for Radioresistant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2021; 2021:5893981. [PMID: 33727921 PMCID: PMC7937465 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5893981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) frequently develop radioresistance, resulting in poor response to radiation and unfavourable prognosis. Early detection of radioresistance hence can guide the adjustment of treatment regimens in time. Exosomes are lipid bilayer-enclosed vesicles with sub-micrometer size that are released by various cells. Exosomes contain a tissue-specific signature wherein a variety of proteins and nucleic acids are selectively packaged. Growing evidence shows exosomes are involved in cancer pathophysiology and exosomes as the latest addition to the liquid biopsy portfolio have been used in cancer diagnosis. Compared to cell free RNA, exosomal lipid envelope can effectively protect RNA cargo against degradation. Therefore, exosomes may hold great promise for the identification of radioresistance. Here, we report six plasma exosomal miRNAs could be used to distinguish radioresistant NSCLC patients from radiosensitive NSCLC patients and to evaluate the prognosis of NSCLC. Samples were obtained from 52 NSCLC patients with or without radioresistance and 45 age-matched healthy volunteers. Exosomes in 1 ml plasma were isolated followed by extraction of small RNA. The expression levels of miRNAs were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. Potential miRNA markers were further evaluated in additional 52 NSCLC patients. We found exosomal miR-1246 and miR-96 are significantly overexpressed in NSCLC patients. Moreover, exosomal miR-96 in patients with radioresistant NSCLC is significantly higher than that of controls. Exosomal miR-96 also demonstrates a significant correlation with vascular invasion and poor overall survival. Altogether, our results indicate that exosomal miR-96 could be a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic marker of radioresistant NSCLC.
Collapse
|
10
|
The Impact of Radiotherapy on the Incidence of Secondary Malignancies: A Pan-Cancer Study in the US SEER Cancer Registries. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:301-316. [PMID: 33435562 PMCID: PMC7903277 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The population of cancer patients with second primary malignancies (SPMs) is rapidly growing. The relationship between radiotherapy and SPMs for some types of tumors is unknown or debated. In this study, we identify 24 types of first primary malignancies (FPMs) between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients in the radiotherapy group were matched to those in the no radiotherapy group with a matching ratio of 1:1. After propensity-score matching (PSM), additional competing risk regression analyses were performed to calculate the efficacy of radiotherapy to SPMs in the PSM-adjusted population. In addition, the Fine and Gray model was utilized in the primary cohorts, and stratified analyses were performed based on surgery. This study includes a total of 2,831,789 eligible patients with tumors diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 in the SEER 18 database, amongst whom 100,194 (3.5%) patients developed SPMs. We observe higher risks of SPMs associated with radiotherapy in several types of tumors in the PSM-adjusted populations (small bowel adenocarcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, urinary bladder transitional cell carcinoma, invasive ductal breast carcinoma, invasive lobular breast carcinoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma). The results in the PSM-adjusted populations were consistent with outcomes in the multivariable competing risk models. Meanwhile, in subgroup analyses stratified by surgery, some other types of tumor (except for those with positive results in the PSM-adjusted cohorts) with radiotherapy were also associated with a higher prevalence of SPMs in the subgroups of surgical treatment (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, rectal adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma and follicular thyroid carcinoma in the surgery subgroups). The impact of radiotherapy on the incidence of secondary malignancies is distinct in different types of cancer. These findings merit further investigation and may ultimately impact treatment decision-making for tumor management.
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel NV, Yu NY, Koroulakis A, Diwanji T, Sawant A, Sio TT, Mohindra P. Proton therapy for thoracic malignancies: a review of oncologic outcomes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:177-191. [PMID: 33118427 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1844567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Radiotherapy is an integral component in the treatment of the majority of thoracic malignancies. By taking advantage of the steep dose fall-off characteristic of protons combined with modern optimization and delivery techniques, proton beam therapy (PBT) has emerged as a potential tool to improve oncologic outcomes while reducing toxicities from treatment.Areas covered: We review the physical properties and treatment techniques that form the basis of PBT as applicable for thoracic malignancies, including a brief discussion on the recent advances that show promise to enhance treatment planning and delivery. The dosimetric advantages and clinical outcomes of PBT are critically reviewed for each of the major thoracic malignancies, including lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mesothelioma, thymic cancer, and primary mediastinal lymphoma.Expert opinion: Despite clear dosimetric benefits with PBT in thoracic radiotherapy, the improvement in clinical outcomes remains to be seen. Nevertheless, with the incorporation of newer techniques, PBT remains a promising modality and ongoing randomized studies will clarify its role to determine which patients with thoracic malignancies receive the most benefit. Re-irradiation, advanced disease requiring high cardio-pulmonary irradiation volume and younger patients will likely derive maximum benefit with modern PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirav V Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Antony Koroulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Amit Sawant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Simone CB, Plastaras JP, Jabbour SK, Lee A, Lee NY, Choi JI, Frank SJ, Chang JY, Bradley J. Proton Reirradiation: Expert Recommendations for Reducing Toxicities and Offering New Chances of Cure in Patients With Challenging Recurrence Malignancies. Semin Radiat Oncol 2020; 30:253-261. [PMID: 32503791 PMCID: PMC10870390 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Local and regional recurrences are common following an initial course of radiotherapy, yet management of these recurrences remains a challenge. Reirradiation may be an optimal treatment approach for providing durable tumor control and even offering select patients with locoregional recurrences or new primary tumors a chance of cure, but photon reirradiation can be associated with considerable risks of high grade acute and late toxicities. The high conformality and lack of exit dose with proton therapy offer significant advantages for reirradiation. By decreasing dose to adjacent normal tissues, proton therapy can more safely deliver definitive instead of palliative doses of reirradiation, more safely dose escalate reirradiation treatment, and more safely allow for concurrent systemic therapy in the reirradiation setting. In this case-based analysis, renowned experts in the fields of proton therapy and of reirradiation present cases for which they recently employed proton reirradiation. This manuscript focuses on case studies in patients with lung cancer, head and neck malignancies, and pelvic malignancies. Considerations for when to deliver proton therapy in the reirradiation setting and the pros and cons of proton therapy are discussed, and the existing literature supporting the use of proton reirradiation for these disease sites is assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Taugner J, Eze C, Käsmann L, Roengvoraphoj O, Gennen K, Karin M, Petrukhnov O, Tufman A, Belka C, Manapov F. Pattern-of-failure and salvage treatment analysis after chemoradiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:148. [PMID: 32517716 PMCID: PMC7285541 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01590-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loco-regional and distant failure are common in inoperable stage III non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, there is limited real-world data on failure pattern, patient prognosis and salvage options. METHODS We analysed 99 consecutive patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with CRT between 2011 and 2016. Follow up CT scans from date of the first-site failure were matched with the delivered radiation treatment plans. Intra-thoracic loco-regional relapse was defined as in-field (IFR) vs. out-of-field recurrence (OFR) [in- vs. outside 50Gy isodose line in the involved lung], respectively. Extracranial distant (DMs) and brain metastases (BMs) as first site of recurrence were also evaluated. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, impact of salvage surgery (sS), radiotherapy (sRT), chemotherapy (sCT) and immunotherapy (sIO) on patient survival was assessed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 60.0 months. Median PFS from the end of CRT for the entire cohort was 7.5 (95% CI: 6.0-9.0 months) months. Twenty-six (26%) and 25 (25%) patients developed IFR and OFR. Median time to diagnosis of IFR and OFR was 7.2 and 6.2 months. In the entire cohort, onset of IFR and OFR did not influence patient outcome. However, in 73 (74%) patients who survived longer than 12 months after initial diagnosis, IFR was a significant negative prognostic factor with a median survival of 19.3 vs 40.0 months (p < 0.001). No patients with IFR underwent sS and/or sRT. 18 (70%) and 5 (19%) patients with IFR underwent sCT and sIO. Three (12%) patients with OFR underwent sS and are still alive with 3-year survival rate of 100%. 5 (20%) patients with OFR underwent sRT with a median survival of 71.2 vs 19.1 months (p = 0.014). Four (16%) patients with OFR received sIO with a numerical survival benefit (64.6 vs. 26.4 months, p = 0.222). DMs and BMs were detected in 27 (27%) and 16 (16%) patients after median time of 5.8 and 5.13 months. Both had no impact on patient outcome in the entire cohort. However, patients with more than three BMs showed significantly poor OS (9.3 vs 26.0 months; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS After completion of CRT, IFR was a negative prognostic factor in those patients, who survived longer than 12 months after initial diagnosis. Patients with OFR benefit significantly from salvage local treatment. Patients with more than three BMs as first site of failure had a significantly inferior outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Taugner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Olarn Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Gennen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Karin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oleg Petrukhnov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fischer-Valuck BW, Robinson CG, Simone CB, Gomez DR, Bradley JD. Challenges in Re-Irradiation in the Thorax: Managing Patients with Locally Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2020; 30:223-231. [PMID: 32503787 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of locally recurrent non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) after definitive chemoradiation therapy is challenging as patients are often inoperable and systemic therapy alone frequently results in suboptimal outcomes. Re-irradiation of NSCLC may be the best strategy for treating locoregional failures with the goal of durable long-term control and potentially cure. Repeat irradiation is technically challenging for fear of life-threatening toxicities to previously irradiated organs at risk while also delivering definitive doses of radiation to recurrent disease. No standard guidelines exist with regards to re-irradiation technique and re-treatment dose constraints to organs at risks. We herein describe a case of locoregional recurrence after definitive chemoradiation therapy for NSCLC with expert opinions for subsequent management. As described and guided by our experts, we review the various techniques for repeat radiation therapy, treatment planning goals, and reported toxicities and outcomes in the re-irradiation setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clifford G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center, New York City, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Käsmann L, Janssen S, Baschnagel AM, Kruser TJ, Harada H, Aktan M, Rades D. Prognostic factors and outcome of reirradiation for locally recurrent small cell lung cancer-a multicenter study. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9:232-238. [PMID: 32420062 PMCID: PMC7225148 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2020.01.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains poor and treatment options are limited. We performed a multi-institution retrospective cohort study to evaluate the outcome of thoracic reirradiation, identify prognostic factors and assess treatment-related toxicity. METHODS Data of 33 patients re-irradiated for recurrent SCLC at 4 international university hospitals, were analysed. Overall survival (OS) acute and late toxicities were evaluated and prognostic factors for reirradiation were identified. RESULTS Reirradiation (Re-RT) was performed at a median interval time of 24 months after the first thoracic radiotherapy series. Median survival after reirradiation was 7 months (range, 1-54 months). The Re-RT dose in EQD2 ranged from 20 to 87.50 Gy with a median of 32.50 Gy. The 1- and 2-year OS were 33% and 17%, respectively. Patients with a good performance status (KPS >70%), absence of extrathoracic disease, reirradiation dose (EQD2) of >40 Gy and a cumulative dose of first plus second series of radiotherapy (EQD2) >90 Gy were associated with improved OS. Acute pulmonary Grade 1-2 toxicity from re-irradiation was recorded in 11 patients (33%) and grade 3 acute toxicity was encountered 1 patient (3%). CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent SCLC is safe and shows promising outcomes. Patients reirradiated with doses >40 Gy experienced more favourable survival rates. In contrast, patients with a poor performance status or extrathoracic disease have a poor prognosis and Re-RT should be considered only for symptom control in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andrew M. Baschnagel
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tim J. Kruser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Meryem Aktan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Troost EGC, Wink KCJ, Roelofs E, Simone CB, Makocki S, Löck S, van Kollenburg P, Dechambre D, Minken AWH, van der Stoep J, Avery S, Jansen N, Solberg T, Bussink J, de Ruysscher D. Photons or protons for reirradiation in (non-)small cell lung cancer: Results of the multicentric ROCOCO in silico study. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190879. [PMID: 31804145 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Locally recurrent disease is of increasing concern in (non-)small cell lung cancer [(N)SCLC] patients. Local reirradiation with photons or particles may be of benefit to these patients. In this multicentre in silico trial performed within the Radiation Oncology Collaborative Comparison (ROCOCO) consortium, the doses to the target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were compared when using several photon and proton techniques in patients with recurrent localised lung cancer scheduled to undergo reirradiation. METHODS 24 consecutive patients with a second primary (N)SCLC or recurrent disease after curative-intent, standard fractionated radio(chemo)therapy were included in this study. The target volumes and OARs were centrally contoured and distributed to the participating ROCOCO sites. Remaining doses to the OARs were calculated on an individual patient's basis. Treatment planning was performed by the participating site using the clinical treatment planning system and associated beam characteristics. RESULTS Treatment plans for all modalities (five photon and two proton plans per patient) were available for 22 patients (N = 154 plans). 3D-conformal photon therapy and double-scattered proton therapy delivered significantly lower doses to the target volumes. The highly conformal techniques, i.e., intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), CyberKnife, TomoTherapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), reached the highest doses in the target volumes. Of these, IMPT was able to statistically significantly decrease the radiation doses to the OARs. CONCLUSION Highly conformal photon and proton beam techniques enable high-dose reirradiation of the target volume. They, however, significantly differ in the dose deposited in the OARs. The therapeutic options, i.e., reirradiation or systemic therapy, need to be carefully weighed and discussed with the patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Highly conformal photon and proton beam techniques enable high-dose reirradiation of the target volume. In light of the abilities of the various highly conformal techniques to spare specific OARs, the therapeutic options need to be carefully weighed and patients included in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partnersite Dresden, Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Krista C J Wink
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Roelofs
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, USA
| | - Sebastian Makocki
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partnersite Dresden, Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter van Kollenburg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - David Dechambre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liege (CHU), Liege, Belgium.,Radiotherapy Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Judith van der Stoep
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen Avery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicolas Jansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liege (CHU), Liege, Belgium
| | - Timothy Solberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Johan Bussink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chinniah C, Aguarin L, Cheng P, Decesaris C, Cutillo A, Berman AT, Frick M, Doucette A, Cengel KA, Levin W, Hahn S, Dorsey JF, Simone CB, Kao GD. Early Detection of Recurrence in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer via Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 2019; 20:384-390.e2. [PMID: 31221522 PMCID: PMC6703908 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assays to identify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) might allow for noninvasive and sequential monitoring of lung cancer. We investigated whether serial CTC analysis could complement conventional imaging for detecting recurrences after treatment in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with LA-NSCLC (stage II-III) who definitively received concurrent chemoradiation were prospectively enrolled, with CTCs from peripheral blood samples identified using an adenoviral probe that detects elevated telomerase activity present in nearly all lung cancer cells. A "detectable" CTC level was defined as 1.3 green flourescent protein-positive cells per milliliter of collected blood. Samples were obtained before, during (at weeks 2, 4, and 6), and after treatment (post-radiation therapy [RT]; at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24). RESULTS Forty-eight patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 10.9 months, 22 (46%) patients had disease recurrence at a median time of 7.6 months post-RT (range, 1.3-32.0 months). Of the 20 of 22 patients for whom post-RT samples were obtained, 15 (75%) had an increase in CTC counts post-RT. In 10 of these 15 patients, CTCs were undetectable on initial post-RT draw but were then detected again before radiographic detection of recurrence, with a median lead time of 6.2 months and mean lead time of 6.1 months (range, 0.1-12.0 months) between CTC count increase and radiographic evidence of recurrence. One patient with an early recurrence (4.7 months) had persistently elevated detectable CTC levels during and after treatment. CONCLUSION These results indicate that longitudinal CTC monitoring in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with chemoradiation is feasible, and that detectable CTC levels in many patients meaningfully precede radiologic evidence of disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chimbu Chinniah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Louise Aguarin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Phillip Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Cristina Decesaris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alicia Cutillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Melissa Frick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stephen Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jay F Dorsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Gary D Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Paradis KC, Mayo C, Owen D, Spratt DE, Hearn J, Rosen B, Kashani R, Moran J, Tatro DS, Beeler W, Vineberg K, Smith DC, Matuszak MM. The Special Medical Physics Consult Process for Reirradiation Patients. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:559-565. [PMID: 31681862 PMCID: PMC6817723 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To present a systematic approach to the reirradiation special medical physics consult (ReRT-SMPC) process. Materials and Methods An in-house reirradiation committee of physicians and physicists was formed to develop a streamlined and well-documented approach to ReRT-SMPCs. Dosimetric goals and considerations for tissue repair were generated by the committee with input from the literature, clinical trial guidelines, and physician experience. Procedural workflow was also defined. Results The total number of ReRT-SMPCs performed in our department in 2018 was 401, corresponding to 369 unique patients and 16% of the total number of patients receiving external beam radiation in our department that year. This constituted a large increase over the 183 ReRT-SMPCs performed in 2017. We have found that a standardized ReRT-SMPC workflow helps to safeguard patients, documents the clinical decision-making process for medical and legal purposes, and facilitates the peer-review process. The data being collected from each consult along with toxicity and outcomes data can be used to help inform future re-treatment guidelines. Conclusions As the number of patients returning for additional courses of radiation continues to increase, a uniform method for the ReRT-SMPC workflow and analysis is a powerful tool for ensuring patient safety, understanding and predicting treatment toxicity, and refining reirradiation dosimetric limits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dawn Owen
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | - Jean Moran
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Badiyan SN, Rutenberg MS, Hoppe BS, Mohindra P, Larson G, Hartsell WF, Tsai H, Zeng J, Rengan R, Glass E, Katz S, Vargas C, Feigenberg SJ, Simone CB. Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Recurrent Lung Cancer Reirradiated With Proton Therapy on the Proton Collaborative Group and University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute Prospective Registry Studies. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:280-288. [PMID: 30802618 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to assess clinical outcomes and toxicities of patients with recurrent lung cancer reirradiated with proton beam therapy (PBT) who were enrolled in 2 prospective registry trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-nine consecutive patients were reirradiated with PBT at 8 institutions. Conventionally fractionated radiation therapy was used to treat the previous lung cancer in 68% of patients (median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2], 60.2 Gy) and hypofractionated/stereotactic body radiation therapy in 32% (median EQD2, 83.3 Gy). Nine patients (11%) received ≥2 courses of thoracic irradiation before PBT. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 2 to 3 in 13%. Median time from prior radiation therapy to PBT was 19.9 months. PBT was delivered with conventional fractionation in 58% (median EQD2, 60 Gy), hyperfractionation in 3% (median EQD2, 62.7 Gy), and hypofractionation in 39% (median EQD2, 60.4 Gy). Twenty-four patients (30%) received chemotherapy concurrently with PBT. RESULTS All patients completed PBT as planned. At a median follow-up of 10.7 months after PBT, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 15.2 months and 10.5 months, respectively. Acute and late grade 3 toxicities occurred in 6% and 1%, respectively. Three patients died after PBT from possible radiation toxicity. On multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status ≤1 was associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.80; P = .014) and PFS (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.73; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series to date of PBT reirradiation for recurrent lung cancer and indicates that reirradiation with PBT is well tolerated with acceptable toxicity and encouraging efficacy. ECOG performance status was associated with OS and PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahed N Badiyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Bradford S Hoppe
- University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Gary Larson
- Oklahoma Procure Proton Therapy Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | | | - Henry Tsai
- New Jersey Procure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Jing Zeng
- University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Erica Glass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sanford Katz
- Willis-Knighton Proton Therapy Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Carlos Vargas
- Mayo Clinic Arizona Proton Therapy Program, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vyfhuis MA, Onyeuku N, Diwanji T, Mossahebi S, Amin NP, Badiyan SN, Mohindra P, Simone CB. Advances in proton therapy in lung cancer. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2018; 12:1753466618783878. [PMID: 30014783 PMCID: PMC6050808 DOI: 10.1177/1753466618783878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States (US) and worldwide. Radiation therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and serves as an excellent alternative for early stage patients who are medically inoperable or who decline surgery. Proton therapy has been shown to offer a significant dosimetric advantage in NSCLC patients over photon therapy, with a decrease in dose to vital organs at risk (OARs) including the heart, lungs and esophagus. This in turn, can lead to a decrease in acute and late toxicities in a population already predisposed to lung and cardiac injury. Here, we present a review on proton treatment techniques, studies, clinical outcomes and toxicities associated with treating both early stage and locally advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A.L. Vyfhuis
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nasarachi Onyeuku
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neha P. Amin
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahed N. Badiyan
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, 850 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201,
USA
| |
Collapse
|