Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) is a rare yet highly lethal kidney cancer. To deepen our understanding of FH-deficient RCC, we conduct a comprehensive integrated genomic study. We analyze the association of FH alteration patterns with tumor heterogeneity and develop a CpG site-specific methylation signature for precise identification of FH-deficient RCC. Transcriptomic analysis unveils three distinctive molecular subtypes characterized by enrichment of immune/Angiogenic/Stromal (C1), WNT/Notch/MAPK (C2), and proliferation/stemness (C3) pathways, respectively. Tumors in C1 derive the most substantial survival benefit from a combination of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and anti-angiogenic therapy. Tumors in C2 display moderate response to this therapeutic approach. In contrast, tumors in C3 exhibit an unfavorable response to anti-angiogenic monotherapy and its combination with ICB. These findings contribute to a profound understanding of the aggressive nature of FH-deficient RCC, offering insights into potential precision medicine approaches for disease management.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a heterogenous group of malignancies with varying degrees of clinical aggressiveness and response to different systemic therapies. As the characterization of subtypes of nccRCC continues to evolve, it is important to understand the evidence around systemic treatments used in advanced or metastatic stages of specific subtypes. Here, we review the literature on systemic therapies in nccRCC, with a focus on prospective trials that included patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), chromophobe RCC, RCC not further classified/unclassified RCC, translocation RCC, collecting duct RCC, and renal medullary carcinoma. We also review emerging treatments for other molecularly defined subtypes of this disease.

Advancements in immunotherapy and angiogenesis-targeted therapies have transformed the upfront treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, long-term prognoses for patients with unresectable and metastatic disease often remain limited, with the majority experiencing progression after exposure to front-line therapy. In most cases of relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease after prior exposure to an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), there is no role for ICI-rechallenge. Therefore, treatment of R/R RCC relies on the appropriate selection of therapies targeting growth pathways dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF).

This review article summarizes the current landscape of targeted therapies for use in second-line or later-line settings for the treatment of clear cell and non-clear cell RCC. Novel therapeutic strategies currently in development are also discussed.

The treatment of R/R RCC primarily consists of inhibition of VEGF, HIF, and mTOR pathways, and the selection of a specific agent depends on the histologic subtype of the tumor, the prior lines of therapy chosen, and patient co-morbidities. Future tumor-based and circulating biomarker research might one day enable the identification of transcriptional signatures that could predict a response to immune, angiogenesis, or HIF-based therapies.

Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm driven by inactivating mutations of the FH gene, which cause metabolites like S-(2-succinyl)cysteine (2SC) to accumulate and trigger cascades supporting malignant transformation. Although in preclinical models the c-GAS-STING pathway is activated by fumarate metabolites, its role in humans has not been explored yet. Eleven FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas, including primary neoplasms and metastases, were retrieved and evaluated for clinical-pathological features and immunohistochemical expression of FH, 2SC (commercially available), and STING. The in-house collection accounted for 0.2% of the 2011-2023 renal cell carcinomas cohort (5/2210). Eight-on-ten cases with available follow-up behaved aggressively (local recurrence/distant metastases). All tumors revealed FH staining loss and strong and diffuse 2SC immunolabeling. At least focal STING expression was detected in most primary tumors (9/11, 82%), often (78%) in a wide percentage of cells (≥ 30%). Notably, significant STING expression was observed in all but two aggressive renal neoplasms, with one of the remaining showing increased staining in its hepatic localization, and in 86% (6/7) of neoplasms significantly expressing PD-L1. In our series, (i) FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma represents 0.2% of in-house cases; (ii) combining FH loss and positive 2SC staining now commercially available is useful in primary and secondary tumors, supporting this latter marker's safe routine adoption; and (iii) a significant STING labeling (≥ 30%) in most of the samples, especially in those behaving aggressively and expressing PD-L1, provides novel insights regarding the molecular basis of FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas, proposing STING as a potential predictive marker.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a heterogeneous group of malignancies with substantial differences in morphology, genetic profiles, clinical behavior, and prognosis. Optimal treatment for nccRCC remains unclear, largely extrapolated from evidence available for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of current mainstream drug treatments for nccRCC to provide clinical treatment guidance for advanced cases.

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for trials published up to January 2, 2024, including controlled and single-arm trials. Primary outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

We selected six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). These trials included four first-line and two second-line studies, with a total of 398 advanced nccRCC patients. Pooled results showed that VEGFR-TKIs significantly improved PFS compared to mTORi in first-line treatment (relative risk [RR] = 1.387; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.85; p = 0.026). In a single-arm meta-analysis, we included 22 VEGFR-TKI trials, three mTORi trials, 12 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies, five chemotherapy trials, and 10 combination therapy trials. The pooled ORR ranged from 6% (95% CI: 0-16%) to 36% (95% CI: 27-44%), and the pooled DCR ranged from 54% (95% CI: 50-58%) to 81% (95% CI: 70-91%). Subgroup analysis of ICI showed a higher ORR in the PD-L1 positive group compared to the PD-L1 negative group (RR = 3.044; 95% CI: 1.623-5.709; p = 0.001).

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that VEGFR-TKIs improve PFS in first-line treatment compared to mTORi. The single-arm meta-analysis suggest that combination therapies with different mechanisms result in better ORR and DCR. Furthermore, PD-L1 positive patients showed significantly better therapeutic responses with ICI treatment than PD-L1 negative patients.

While the clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) treatment has undergone several paradigm shifts in recent years, the non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) therapeutic approach has yet to be extensively investigated and improved. The WHO 2022 classification of renal neoplasms redefined the most common nccRCC subtypes (papillary and chromophobe RCC) and introduced the molecularly defined RCC class, which is a first step in the direction of better molecular profiling of nccRCC. We reviewed the literature data on known genomic alterations of clinical interest in nccRCC and discussed their potential role in guiding therapeutic choices in each nccRCC entity. Among the alterations discussed, we focused on the ones that could be treated with already available drugs, such as MET-driven papillary RCC, mechanistic target of rapamycin altered chromophobe RCC, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged RCC, and fumarate-hydratase deficient RCC. Furthermore, we focused on the currently ongoing clinical trials and further evidence for all the other entities, such as SMARCB1-deficient RCC, TFE3 and transcription factorEB (TFEB)-altered RCC, and Elongin C (ELOC)-mutated RCC. The vast heterogeneity of nccRCC does not allow a one-size-fits-all solution; therefore, molecular characterization is the path toward effective therapies and fully personalized medicine for these entities.

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) is caused by loss of function mutations in fumarate hydratase (FH) and results in an aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma with limited treatment options. Loss of FH leads to accumulation of fumarate, an oncometabolite that disrupts multiple cellular processes and drives tumor progression. High levels of fumarate inhibit alpha ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, including the ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes, and can lead to global DNA hypermethylation. Here, we report patterns of hypermethylation in FH-mutant cell lines and tumor samples are associated with the silencing of nicotinate phosphoribosyl transferase (NAPRT), a rate-limiting enzyme in the Preiss-Handler pathway of NAD+ biosynthesis, in a subset of HLRCC cases. NAPRT is hypermethylated at a CpG island in the promoter in cell line models and patient samples, resulting in loss of NAPRT expression. We find that FH-deficient RCC models with loss of NAPRT expression, as well as other oncometabolite-producing cancer models that silence NAPRT, are extremely sensitive to nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase inhibitors (NAMPTi). NAPRT silencing was also associated with synergistic tumor cell killing with PARP inhibitors and NAMPTis, which was associated with effects on PAR-mediated DNA repair. Overall, our findings indicate that NAPRT silencing can be targeted in oncometabolite-producing cancers and elucidates how oncometabolite-associated hypermethylation can impact diverse cellular processes and lead to therapeutically relevant vulnerabilities in cancer cells. Implications: NAPRT is a novel biomarker for targeting NAD+ metabolism in FH-deficient HLRCCs with NAMPTis alone and targeting DNA repair processes with the combination of NAMPTis and PARP inhibitors.

Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas are rare neoplasms characterized by wide morphologic heterogeneity and pathogenetic mutations in the FH gene. They often show aggressive behavior with rapid diffusion to distant organs, so novel therapeutic scenarios have been explored, including EGFR inhibitors and PD-L1 expression for targeted immunotherapy. Herein, we investigated a series of 11 primary FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas and 7 distant metastases to evaluate tumor heterogeneity even in metastatic sites and estimate the specific spread rates to various organs. Furthermore, the tumors were tested for immunohistochemical PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutations. Most metastatic cases involved the abdominal lymph nodes (4/7; 57%), followed by the peritoneum (3/7; 42%), the liver (2/7; 29%), and the lungs (1/7; 14%). Six metastatic localizations were histologically documented, revealing a morphologic heterogeneous architecture often differing from that of the corresponding primary renal tumor. Peritoneal involvement morphologically resembled a benign reactive mesothelial process or primary peritoneal mesothelioma, thus advocating to perform an accurate immunohistochemical panel, including PAX8 and FH, to reach a proper diagnosis. A pure low-grade succinate dehydrogenase-looking primary FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma was also recorded. As for therapy, significant PD-L1 labeling was found in 60% of primary renal tumors, whereas none of them carried pathogenetic EGFR mutations. Our data show that FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma may be morphologically heterogeneous in metastases as well, which involve the lymph nodes, the liver, and the peritoneum more frequently than other renal tumors. Due to the high frequency of this latter (42%), pathologists should always be concerned about ruling out mesothelial-derived mimickers, and the occurrence of rarer, primary, low-grade-looking types. Finally, contrary to EGFR mutations, PD-L1 expression could be a possible predictive biomarker for the therapy of these tumors.

Traditional therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy have burdened cancer patients with onerous physical and psychological challenges. Encouragingly, the landscape of tumor treatment has undergone a comprehensive and remarkable transformation. Emerging as fervently pursued modalities are small molecule targeted agents, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), cell-based therapies, and gene therapy. These cutting-edge treatment modalities not only afford personalized and precise tumor targeting, but also provide patients with enhanced therapeutic comfort and the potential to impede disease progression. Nonetheless, it is acknowledged that these therapeutic strategies still harbour untapped potential for further advancement. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the merits and limitations of these treatment modalities holds the promise of offering novel perspectives for clinical practice and foundational research endeavours. In this review, we discussed the different treatment modalities, including small molecule targeted drugs, peptide drugs, antibody drugs, cell therapy, and gene therapy. It will provide a detailed explanation of each method, addressing their status of development, clinical challenges, and potential solutions. The aim is to assist clinicians and researchers in gaining a deeper understanding of these diverse treatment options, enabling them to carry out effective treatment and advance their research more efficiently.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.

Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) is a rare and lethal subtype of kidney cancer. However, the optimal treatments and molecular correlates of benefits for FH-deficient RCC are currently lacking.

A total of 91 patients with FH-deficient RCC from 15 medical centers between 2009 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. Genomic and bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed on 88 and 45 untreated FH-deficient RCCs, respectively. Single-cell RNA-seq was performed to identify biomarkers for treatment response. Main outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) for localized patients, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for patients with metastasis.

In the localized setting, we found that a cell-cycle progression signature enabled to predict disease progression. In the metastatic setting, first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI+TKI) combination therapy showed satisfactory safety and was associated with a higher ORR (43.2% vs. 5.6%), apparently superior PFS (median PFS, 17.3 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.016) and OS (median OS, not reached vs. 25.7 months, P = 0.005) over TKI monotherapy. Bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data revealed an enrichment of memory and effect T cells in responders to ICI plus TKI combination therapy. Furthermore, we identified a signature of memory and effect T cells that was associated with the effectiveness of ICI plus TKI combination therapy.

ICI plus TKI combination therapy may represent a promising treatment option for metastatic FH-deficient RCC. A memory/active T-cell-derived signature is associated with the efficacy of ICI+TKI but necessitates further validation.

Renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Management has drastically changed with the new era of immunotherapy, and novel strategies are being developed; however, identifying systemic treatments is still challenging. This paper presents an update of the expert panel consensus from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group on advanced renal cell carcinoma management in Brazil.

A panel of 34 oncologists and experts in renal cell carcinoma discussed and voted on the best options for managing advanced disease in Brazil, including systemic treatment of early and metastatic renal cell carcinoma as well as nonclear cell tumours. The results were compared with the literature and graded according to the level of evidence.

Adjuvant treatments benefit patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery, and the agents used are pembrolizumab and sunitinib, with a preference for pembrolizumab. Neoadjuvant treatment is exceptional, even in initially unresectable cases. First-line treatment is mainly based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the choice of treatment is based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMCD) risk score. Patients at favourable risk receive ICIs in combination with TKIs. Patients classified as intermediate or poor risk receive ICIs, without preference for ICI + ICIs or ICI + TKIs. Data on nonclear cell renal cancer treatment are limited. Active surveillance has a place in treating favourable-risk patients. Either denosumab or zoledronic acid can be used for treating metastatic bone disease.

Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are the standards of care for advanced disease. The utilization and sequencing of these therapeutic agents hinge upon individual risk scores and responses to previous treatments. This consensus reflects a commitment to informed decision-making, drawn from professional expertise and evidence in the medical literature.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) makes up nearly one quarter of all RCC subtypes, commonly impacts younger patients, and is often metastatic at presentation. Compared to clear-cell RCC (ccRCC), nccRCC typically has a worse prognosis in the metastatic setting, with overall survival durations that are ~10 months shorter. The nccRCC consists of a wide range of different histological subtypes, the majority of which are composed of papillary, chromophobe, renal medullary carcinoma, translocation RCC, collecting duct carcinoma and unclassified RCC. Most clinical trials have either excluded or only included small numbers of patients with nccRCC; owing to the lack of prospective studies focusing on this population, data on response rates and survival outcomes are lacking. NccRCC treatment is a nascent field with various therapeutic modalities and combinations under investigation, often based on data extrapolated from therapeutic studies in ccRCC. We herein review the use and outcomes of cytotoxic chemotherapy, various combination modalities of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted agents. We discuss active ongoing clinical trials for patients with nccRCC and future directions in the treatment of this rare disease. Historically, treatment for nccRCC has been adopted from the standard of care for patients with ccRCC, although these treatments are less effective in the nccRCC population. As we begin to understand the underlying biology of these tumors, clinical trials have been able to slowly accrue and include more patients with various subtypes of nccRCC. There remains much room for improvement in this area of need, but there is hope on the horizon.

High-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC), often diagnosed at advanced stages, significantly contributes to renal cancer-related mortality. This review explores the progress in understanding specific subtypes of high-grade RCC, namely fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient RCC, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, all of which are now recognized as molecularly defined entities in the WHO classification system (2022). While these entities each exhibit a morphologic spectrum that overlaps with other high-grade RCC, ancillary tools developed based on their distinctive molecular alterations can help establish a specific diagnosis, underscoring the importance of integrating molecular findings into diagnostic paradigms. It is important to exclude these specific tumor types in cases with similar morphologic spectrum before rendering a diagnosis of high-grade papillary RCC, collecting duct carcinoma, or RCC, NOS. Several gray areas exist within the spectrum of high-grade uncommon types of RCC, necessitating continued research to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic options.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) comprises 15-20% of all patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although in the localized setting where pRCC appears to have better outcomes than clear cell RCC (ccRCC), patients with metastatic pRCC have significantly worse outcomes than patients with metastatic ccRCC. Because of the overall rarity of pRCC, there have been less research and clinical trials devoted to this subtype. Therefore, treatment of pRCC has generally been extrapolated from approved therapies for ccRCC. Recent data shows promise with newer tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and there is emerging evidence on their combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, more dedicated clinical trials to pRCC are urgently needed, as response rates and outcomes still lag behind ccRCC. This review summarizes the pathophysiology, genetic features, the evolution of treatment approaches since the systemic cytokine era, and current challenges of managing pRCC.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer and is divided into two distinct subtypes, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). Although many treatments exist for RCC, these are largely based on clinical trials performed in ccRCC and there are limited studies on the management of nccRCC. Non-clear cell RCC consists of multiple histological subtypes: papillary, chromophobe, translocation, medullary, collecting duct, unclassified, and other rare histologies. Due to variations in pathogenesis and therapeutic response, therapy should be tailored to specific variant histologies. For patients with localized nccRCC, surgical resection remains the gold standard. In the metastatic setting, the standard of care has yet to be clearly defined, and most guidelines recommend clinical trial participation. General therapeutic options include immunotherapy, either as monotherapy or in combination, targeted therapies such as vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and MET inhibitors, and chemotherapy in certain subtypes. Here we present a review of the incidence and pathogenesis of the various subtypes, as well as available clinical data to support therapeutic recommendations for these subtypes. We also highlight currently available clinical trials in nccRCC and future directions in investigating novel treatment modalities tailored to patients with variant histology.

Fumarate Hydratase-deficient-renal cell carcinoma (FH-dRCC) is an uncommon and extremely aggressive variant of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) resulting from inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor gene, fumarate hydratase (FH).

We report a case of a young male who presented with the complaint of painless hematuria. Upon workup, he was found to have a renal mass with bony metastases. The histopathology was consistent with renal cell carcinoma with features of FH-deficient variant. Germline testing showed a pathogenic mutation in the FH gene. He was started on a treatment combination of Pembrolizumab and Axitinib along with Zoledronate for bone metastasis. His response to the combination therapy was short with early progression of disease. He was switched to a second-line treatment Bevacizumab and Erlotinib, which achieved significant disease response.

Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic disease. Although the novel agents approved for other subsets of RCC have been used, the responses are grim. There is no consensus on the sequence of further lines of treatment for FH-dRCC and is based on the physician's choice, availability of the drugs, cost, toxicity, and tolerance of the patient.

This case report emphasizes the occurrence, presentation, management and prognosis of FH-dRCC, which is an aggressive entity, presenting at a young age with early distant metastases, not diagnosed appropriately due to its poorly characterized cytologic features. Being an infrequent neoplasm, it is an area that warrants oncological exploration to improve outcomes in these individuals. The combination of Erlotinib and Bevacizumab provides promising outcomes in terms of progression-free survival.

Fumarate hydratase (FH) is an enzyme of the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) cycle whose mutations lead to hereditary and sporadic forms of cancer. Although more than twenty years have passed since its discovery as the leading cause of the cancer syndrome Hereditary leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Carcinoma (HLRCC), it is still unclear how the loss of FH causes cancer in a tissue-specific manner and with such aggressive behaviour. It has been shown that FH loss, via the accumulation of FH substrate fumarate, activates a series of oncogenic cascades whose contribution to transformation is still under investigation. In this review, we will summarise these recent findings in an integrated fashion and put forward the case that understanding the biology of FH and how its mutations promote transformation will be vital to establish novel paradigms of oncometabolism.

The term variant histology renal cell carcinomas (vhRCCs), also known as non-clear cell RCCs, refers to a diverse group of malignancies with distinct biologic and therapeutic considerations. The management of vhRCC subtypes is often based on extrapolating results from the more common clear cell RCC studies or basket trials that are not specific to each histology. The unique management of each vhRCC subtype necessitates accurate pathologic diagnosis and dedicated research efforts. Herein, we discuss tailored recommendations for each vhRCC histology informed by ongoing research and clinical experience.

The new WHO classification of urogenital tumours published in 2022, contains significant revisions upon the previous 2016 version regarding Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). While the most common histotype remains almost untouched, some of the main novelties concerns papillary RCC and oncocytic neoplasms. The main change is the introduction of a new category of molecularly-defined RCC, which includes TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-rearranged, and TFEB-amplified RCC, FH-deficient RCC, SDH-deficient RCC, ALK-rearranged RCC, ELOC (formerly TCEB1)-mutated RCC, SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient RCC. In this paper we analyze the current knowledge on emerging entities and molecularly-defined RCC to assess whether the current pathological classification offers the oncologist the possibility of selecting more specific and personalized treatments, from both those currently available, as well as those that will soon be available.

FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare and exceptionally aggressive RCC subtype. There is currently limited understanding of the molecular alterations, pathogenesis, survival outcomes, and systemic therapy efficacy for this cancer.

To perform a retrospective multicenter analysis of molecular profiling and clinical outcomes for patients with FH-deficient RCC, with an emphasis on treatment response to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI/TKI) versus bevacizumab plus erlotinib (Bev/Erlo) combination therapy in patients with advanced disease.

The study included 77 cases of FH-deficient RCC from 15 centers across China.

Clinical characteristics, molecular correlates, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging, and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

A total of 77 patients were identified, including 70 cases with a germline FH alteration (hereditary leiomyomatosis RCC syndrome [HLRCC]-associated RCC) and seven patients with somatic FH loss. Recurrent pathogenic alterations were found in NF2 (six/57, 11%), CDH1 (six/57, 11%), PIK3CA (six/57, 11%), and TP53 (five/57, 8.8%). Sixty-seven patients were evaluable for response to first-line systemic therapy with Bev/Erlo (n = 12), TKI monotherapy (n = 29), or ICI/TKI (n = 26). ICI/TKI combination therapy was associated with more favorable overall survival on systemic treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.90) and progression-free survival on first-line therapy (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.71) compared to Bev/Erlo combination therapy. The main limitation is the retrospective study design.

We described the genomic characteristics of FH-deficient RCC in an Asian population and observed a favorable response to ICI/TKI combinational therapy among patients with advanced disease.

This real-world study provides evidence supporting the antitumour activity of combining molecular targeted therapy plus immunotherapy for kidney cancer deficient in fumarate hydratase. Further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of this combination strategy in this rare cancer.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an entity comprised of a heterogeneous constellation of RCC subtypes. Genomic profiling has broadened our understanding of molecular pathogenic mechanisms unique to individual nccRCC subtypes. To date, clinical trials evaluating the use of immunotherapies and targeted therapies have predominantly been conducted in patients with clear cell histology. A comprehensive review of the literature has been undertaken in order to describe molecular pathogenic mechanisms pertaining to each nccRCC subtype, and concisely summarise findings from therapeutic trials conducted in the nccRCC space.

Although papillary renal cell carcinoma has historically been classified as either type 1 or type 2, data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has demonstrated significant genomic heterogeneity in tumors classified as "type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma" (T2PRCC). Papillary renal cell carcinoma is expected to have a favorable clinical course compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). However, tumors with poor outcome more similar to CCRCC were included in the T2PRCC cohort studied by the TCGA. The differential diagnosis for T2PRCC includes a variety of other renal tumors, including aggressive entities such as TFE3 translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, high-grade CCRCC, and collecting duct carcinoma. Accurate classification of these tumors is important for prognostication and selection of therapy.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease comprising a variety of histological subtypes. Approximately 70-80% of RCC cases are clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC), while the remaining subtypes constitute non-clear cell carcinoma (nccRCC). The medical treatment of RCC has greatly changed in recent years through advances in molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Most of the novel systemic therapies currently available have been approved based on ccRCC clinical trial data. nccRCC can be subdivided into more than 40 histological subtypes that have distinct clinical, histomorphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. These entities are listed as emerging in the 2022 World Health Organization classification. The diagnosis of nccRCC and treatments based on cancer histology and biology remain challenging due to the disease's rarity. We reviewed clinical trials focused on recent discoveries regarding clinicopathological features.

Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FHRCC) is highly malignant, but the urgent need for effective treatment remains unmet. We aimed to analyze the genomic characteristics and microenvironment of FHRCC and the cause of heterogeneous response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment at single-cell level.

Whole-exome sequencing and IHC staining analyses were performed in 30 advanced FHRCC patients. Single-cell RNA sequencing following ICI-based treatment was conducted in 4 patients. The clinical characteristics, therapeutic effect, and follow-up data were analyzed.

The median tumor mutation burden was only 0.14 mutations per megabase. IHC staining showed an immune-active tumor microenvironment characterized by extensive CD8+ T-cell infiltration. ATM expression was inversely correlated with percentage of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Trajectory analysis indicated gradually upregulated exhausted markers and an increased apoptotic trend of CD8+ T cells despite continuous exposure to ICI-based treatment. ICI-based treatment was associated with improved overall response rate (17.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.046) and disease control rate (DCR; 64.7% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.004) compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Among patients with germline mutation, the ORR (16.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.086) and the DCR (66.7% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.011) were higher after ICI-based treatment.

Immune infiltration is frequent in FHRCC. ICI-based treatment is a promising regimen, and treatment response depends on the functional status of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. ICI-based treatment cannot reverse the exhaustion of CD8+ T cells in patients with progressive disease, highlighting the need for additional therapeutic strategies.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is the most common subtype of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PRCC can be subdivided into types 1 and 2 based on histology, each associated with different genetic mutations. The MET gene is commonly altered in type 1 PRCC while multiple alterations are involved in type 2 PRCC. PRCC is an aggressive cancer with a predominance in male and black patients and poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, there was a lack of convincing prospective data to guide treatment; hence, therapies were previously extrapolated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma with mixed results. More recently, some phase 2 trials focused on PRCC have been promising. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy is considered the standard of care, and combination strategies with TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors are emerging. Genetic profiling and large-scale clinical trials are needed to inform targeted treatment of PRCC.

Metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an heterogenous group, usually excluded from phase 3 trials. We report real life data of prognosis and systemic management of those patients.

We retrospectively included 102 metastatic nccRCC patients (unspecified papillary, n = 10; type 1 and 2 papillary n = 10 and n = 32; translocation RCC, n = 9; chromophobe, n = 14; collecting duct, n = 14) treated between 2006 and 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

Among patients who underwent pathological review, 40.8% presented a complete histological discordance. First line treatments were mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitor (60.8%), combination including immunotherapy (7.8%) or combination of chemotherapy (13.7%). Median ORR ranged from 0% in unspecified papillary RCC to 42.9% in type 1 papillary RCC. Median PFS ranged from 2.9 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 10.9 months in type 1 papillary RCC. Median OS ranged from 6.8 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 29.1 months in MiT family translocation RCC. Thirty (29.4%) patients were included in a treatment trial during their treatment course.

Metastatic nccRCC patients have variable prognosis due to heterogeneity of histological subtypes. Their diagnosis and access to therapeutic innovation remain suboptimal. Dedicated prospective trials are needed.

Historically, kidney cancer was diagnosed as either clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) or non-clear cell renal carcinoma (nccRCC). With further research into the pathophysiology of nccRCC, multiple distinct subtypes have emerged creating distinct diagnosis, such as papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (crRCC), or unclassified carcinoma (cRCC). Many other kidney cancer subtypes are now included in the WHO classification system.

The prognosis for each of the more frequently diagnosed types is discussed here along with treatment recommendations. The available clinical trial results and salient retrospective studies of each subtype are reviewed here to guide clinicians on the optimal treatment selection for patients with these rare histologic types or RCC. Many nccRCC types are now recognized and each has unique molecular drivers which are different than ccRCC. The optimal treatment strategy is different for each subtype. The prognosis also differs based on the histology.

To provide an overview of diagnosis, genetic abnormalities, clinical signs and treatment options for the major heritable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) syndromes.

RCC in major hereditary syndromes are disorders which are typically autosomal dominant. They predispose patients to early onset of RCC and may exhibit other extrarenal manifestations. Early recognition of these diseases allows correct screening at appropriate ages as well as early detection of RCC. Moreover, expedient identification may optimize the management of extra renal manifestations as well as allow for genetic testing and screening of at-risk relatives.

The risk of RCC in these major heritable syndromes is higher than sporadic disease. They occur at earlier age groups and can be multifocal or bilateral. Tumours are observed until at least 3 cm before any intervention, while nephron sparing surgery is widely considered as the treatment of choice except for hereditary leiomyomatosis with renal cell cancer, of which radical nephrectomy is treatment of choice. Intervention should be timeous as there is a highly reported incidence of early metastasis. Molecular therapies have been used in the setting of patients with metastasis, some of which show favourable outcomes.