Guidelines recommend biomarker testing and biomarker-informed therapies in patients with metastatic non-small cell cancer (mNSCLC); however, the use remains suboptimal.

To understand contemporary testing and treatment patterns, retrospective data from 42,037 patients with mNSCLC in a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database from January 2011 to April 2023 were used to quantify testing rates, test positivity, and use of biomarker-informed therapies, stratified by key demographics to identify potential disparities. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to include patient characteristics associated with the receipt of biomarker testing and subsequent biomarker-informed therapies.

A total of 34,510 patients (82.1%) received ≥one biomarker test(s). Biomarker testing and use of biomarker-informed therapies increased for all studied biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, PD-L1, BRAF, RET, MET) over time, with highest rates observed in 2023: EGFR (88.7% and 79.5%, respectively) and ALK (87.7% and 84.3%, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression, patient sex, race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group at baseline, insurance type, smoking status at baseline, and histology were all significantly associated with odds of receiving biomarker testing. Covariates statistically associated with receipt of biomarker-informed therapy varied by biomarker without a clear pattern of association. Although the use of biomarker testing and biomarker-informed therapies has increased in recent years, gaps and potential disparities remain.

Analysis of contemporary trends in biomarker testing and use of targeted therapies in mNSCLC in the United States highlight improvements in recent years. However, these rates remain suboptimal in specific strata of the patient population, including differences in racial groups and insurance groups, indicating further work is needed to bridge remaining gaps.

With the rapid advancements in second-generation gene sequencing technologies, a growing number of driver genes and associated therapeutic targets have been unveiled for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). While they are clinically classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), they display distinct genomic features and substantial variations in clinical efficacy, underscoring the need for particular attention. Hence, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in driver genes, epigenetic targets, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for LUAD and LUSC. Additionally, it delves into the distinctions in signaling pathways and pivotal facets of clinical management specific to these two categories of lung cancer. Moreover, we furnish pertinent details regarding clinical trials pertaining to driver genes and epigenetics, thus establishing a theoretical foundation for the realization of precision treatments for LUAD and LUSC.

BRAF mutations are critical drivers in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. The most common mutation, BRAF V600E, is a key therapeutic target. Targeted treatments with BRAF and MEK inhibitors have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in melanoma patients. However, in cancers like metastatic colorectal cancer, BRAF mutations are associated with poor outcomes due to aggressive disease behavior and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Despite progress, resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors remains a major challenge, often driven by secondary mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, activation of alternative pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)/protein kinase B (AKT), or changes in the tumor microenvironment. These challenges have motivated ongoing research into combining BRAF inhibitors with immunotherapies to enhance and prolong treatment effectiveness. Future research must also account for the role of the cancer's tissue of origin, as the biological context significantly influences response to targeted therapies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of tumor biology, micro-environment, and genetics.

The differences in clinical characteristics and treatment prognosis in NSCLC patients harboring primary and acquired BRAF mutations are still poorly understood.

From Oct 2017 to Dec 2023, 10, 211 lung cancer patients at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were reviewed. 88 primary and 15 acquired BRAF-mutated NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR TKIs were included in the study.

Primary BRAF-mutated patients preferentially occurred in the elderly (median age: 67 vs 61, p=0.015), males (53.4% vs 26.7%, p=0.056), former/current smokers (36.5% vs 6.7%, p=0.033), non-adenocarcinoma (11.4% vs 0%, P=0.351) compared to acquired BRAF-mutated patients. Significant differences in gender (33.3% vs 62.3%, p=0.012), smoking history (22.2% vs 43.1%, p=0.063), and adenocarcinomas (100% vs 83.6%, p=0.028) were observed between primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated and non-co-mutated groups. While primary and acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients had similar clinical characteristics, with EGFR mutations being the most common coexisting oncogene (30.7% and 93.3%). The genotype of EGFR mutations differed, with acquired BRAF-mutated cases showing more complexity and a higher rate of dual EGFR mutations (35.7%) compared to primary cases. For primary BRAF/EGFR co-mutated patients, no matter what kinds of therapies, the EGFR 19del patients had a better prognosis than non-19del patients, and the first line mPFS was NR and 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.3 months) (p=0.0062), respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib plus 3rd EGFR TKIs improved the prognosis of primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated patients, achieving ORR and mPFS of 100% (3/3) and 12 months. For acquired co-mutated patients, the mPFS for 5 patients was 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-11.8 months). No new safety concerns and > grade 3 AEs were noted.

Together, our study demonstrates that primary and acquired BRAF-mutant patients show distinct differences in some clinical and molecular characteristics, but acquired BRAF/EGFR co-mutated and primary BRAF/EGFR non-19del co-mutated patients may both respond to triple-targeted therapy.

Due to the low incidence of BRAF mutations, limited data is available about their prevalence and clinical characteristics. Moreover, comparative real-world efficacy of dabrafenib combined with trametinib versus other treatment regimens, especially in Chinese patients, is also lacking.

Patients who had BRAF genetic testing from the Lung Cancer Big Data Precise Treatment Collaboration Group (LANDSCAPE) database were included as Cohort I. The LANDSCAPE database comprises next-generation sequencing (NGS) data of 175,336 patients with lung cancer, originating from 6 Chinese genetic testing institutions. Cohort II included patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with a primary BRAF mutation from 19 centres in China from December 2015 to September 2022.

In Cohort I, of patients with NSCLC, 6249 (3.56%, 95% CI: 3.48%-3.65%) were confirmed to harbour a BRAF mutation. BRAF V600E accounted for 24.6% (1539/6249) of all patients with BRAF-mutated NSCLC. In Cohort II, a total of 129 patients with locally advanced or metastatic BRAF-mutated NSCLC were included. Of 112 patients who received NGS testing, 80 (71.4%) patients had concomitant mutations. The median first-line real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) of dabrafenib plus trametinib for patients with BRAF V600 mutations was 25.0 months (N = 37), which was numerically longer than first-line immunotherapy-based therapy (N = 12, 15.7 months), and chemotherapy (N = 17, 9.2 months).

This study indicates that dabrafenib plus trametinib could be considered as the optimal treatment option for Chinese patients with NSCLC harbouring BRAF V600 mutations.

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82072583); Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program (PX2020044); Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme (QML20231113); Science Foundation of Peking University Cancer Hospital (2022-17); Peking University Cancer Hospital Inner Mongolia Hospital Public Hospital Reform and High-Quality Development Demonstration Project (Gastrointestinal Cancer + Thoracic Cancer) Research Fund (2024YNYB006).

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a BRAF V600E mutation is rare and associated with a worse prognosis compared with wild-type BRAF. The first-line treatment options include a combination of a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor or immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Unlike advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements, the mechanisms of resistance are poorly understood. We report a case of small cell transformation after treatment with a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor, which illustrates one potential resistance mechanism. We extrapolated therapeutic data from de novo small cell lung cancer to this case. However, the outcome was unsatisfactory.

V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations are found in up to 4% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately 2% of advanced NSCLC cases harbor a BRAF V600E (class I) mutation. Because targeted therapies inhibiting BRAF (e.g., dabrafenib and encorafenib) and MEK (trametinib and binimetinib) are associated with improved outcomes as first- or second-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutant NSCLC, both European Society for Medical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend testing for the BRAF V600E oncogenic driver at the time of diagnosis. In recent years, the treatment landscape of this molecular subgroup has seen great development. Different therapeutic strategies including anti-programmed death ligand 1 antibodies and kinase inhibitors have been assessed thus far, with novel agents (e.g., pan-BRAF inhibitors) and therapeutic associations underway in preclinical and clinical trials. This review describes the current understanding of the BRAF clinicopathologic role in NSCLC, with a special focus on published trials assessing currently approved therapies. Mechanisms of drug resistance and future perspectives on the therapeutic approach of BRAF-deregulated NSCLC are also summarized.

Lung adenocarcinoma is the most prevalent type of lung cancer, with invasive lung adenocarcinoma being the most common subtype. Screening and early treatment of high-risk individuals have improved survival; however, significant differences in prognosis still exist among patients at the same stage, especially in the early stages. Invasive lung adenocarcinoma has different histological morphologies and biological characteristics that can distinguish its prognosis. Notably, several studies have found that the pathological subtypes of invasive lung adenocarcinoma are closely associated with clinical treatment. This review summarised the distribution of various pathological subtypes of invasive lung adenocarcinoma in the population and their relationship with sex, smoking, imaging features, and other histological characteristics. We comprehensively analysed the genetic characteristics and biomarkers of the different pathological subtypes of invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Understanding the interaction between the pathological subtypes of invasive lung adenocarcinoma and the tumour microenvironment helps to reveal new therapeutic targets for lung adenocarcinoma. We also extensively reviewed the prognosis of various pathological subtypes and their effects on selecting surgical methods and adjuvant therapy and explored future treatment strategies.

About 1% to 5% of cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been found to have a BRAF mutation. There is no phase III data, despite the fact that numerous phase II and retrospective studies have demonstrated the efficacy of single agent BRAF inhibition and combination BRAF/MEK inhibition in patient groups that have received treatment and those who have not. Our goal in this systematic review was to provide an overview of the available evidence in this context.

A thorough search was conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for English-language papers published between January 2000 and December 2023 that had full text accessibility. Independently, one author screened the eligible studies that fit our predetermined requirements. A synthesis of the qualitative data was conducted, and the design and quality of the studies were evaluated.

There were 2952 articles found using the search method. Twelve publications with a total of 753 patients were included after two rounds of screening. 33-75% was the objective response rate (ORR). 64-100% was the disease control rate (DCR). The time span for the answer varied from 6.4 to 16.7 months. The range of the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.2 to 17.5 months. The range of the median overall survival (OS) was 1.7-25.5 months. When comparing studies with single agent BRAF inhibitors to those reporting the results of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors, the response rates, duration of response, and survival were better in the former case. When untreated patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy were compared to previously treated patients, the results were also improved. Hypertension, pyrexia, hyponatremia, neutropenia, dyspnoea, anaemia, abnormal liver function, asthenia, and cutaneous epidermoid carcinoma were among the frequently reported grade ≥3 toxicity.

Patients with advanced NSCLC that include a BRAF mutation have demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes with a manageable safety profile when treated with BRAF inhibitors, either in combination with or without MEK inhibitor therapy. In patients who had not received treatment before, combination treatment produced greater results.

BRAF mutations are generally divided into three classes based on the different altered mechanism of activation.

We queried the public AACR GENIE database (version 13.1), which includes tumor mutation burden (TMB) data, to explore potential molecular differences among the three classes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Out of 20,713 unique NSCLC patients, 324 (1.6%) were BRAF mutations positive (BRAF+) class I, 260 (1.3%) class II, and 236 (1.1%) class III. The distribution of patient characteristics, including sex, age, and race, remains uniform across the three classes. The median TMB (mt/MB) was 6.5, 9.5, and 10.3 for class I, II, and III, respectively. The mean TMB was 61.5 ± 366.1 for class I, 40.5 ± 156.2 for class II, and 129.4 ± 914.8 for class III. About 30.5% of BRAF V600E+ patients had TMB ≥ 10; 47.7% of class II had TMB ≥ 10; and 52.5% of class III had TMB ≥ 10. For those patients with TMB ≥ 10, the median TMB was 45, 28.9, 18.4 for class I, II, and III, respectively. For TMB ≥ 10 patients, TP53 mutation was the most common co-alterations across all 3 classes.

A substantial proportion of BRAF+ NSCLC patients exhibited a TMB ≥ 10, among all three classes of BRAF mutation classification, including BRAF V600E+ NSCLC. Class III mutations appeared to have the highest median TMB, followed by class II, and then class I.

Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biology and tumor progression mechanisms, resulting in the development of novel strategies for early detection and wide-ranging care approaches. Since their introduction, over 20 years ago, targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for NSCLC. Nowadays, targeted therapies remain the gold standard for many patients, but still they suffer from many adverse effects, including unexpected toxicity and intrinsic acquired resistance mutations, which lead to relapse. The adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 2015, has offered exceptional survival benefits for patients without targetable alterations. Despite this notable progress, challenges remain, as not all patients respond favorably to ICIs, and resistance to therapy can develop over time. A crucial factor influencing clinical response to immunotherapy is the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME is pivotal in orchestrating the interactions between neoplastic cells and the immune system, influencing tumor growth and treatment outcomes. In this review, we discuss how the understanding of this intricate relationship is crucial for the success of immunotherapy and survey the current state of immunotherapy intervention, with a focus on forthcoming and promising chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies in NSCLC. The TME sets major obstacles for CAR-T therapies, creating conditions that suppress the immune response, inducing T cell exhaustion. To enhance treatment efficacy, specific efforts associated with CAR-T cell therapy in NSCLC, should definitely focus TME-related immunosuppression and antigen escape mechanisms, by combining CAR-T cells with immune checkpoint blockades.

BRAF V600E mutations occur in 2-5 % of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The dabrafenib-trametinib (D-T) combination was associated with improved and durable OS in patients in phase II. This study (IFCT-2004 BLaDE study) reported the efficacy of D-T combination in a large retrospective French real-world multicenter cohort of patients with advanced BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC.

Patients with advanced BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC diagnosed between 01.01.2016 and 31.12.2019 and treated with D-T in combination, regardless of the treatment line, were included. The primary endpoint was the 12-month OS rate (%) in patients receiving D-T as a second-line therapy or beyond.

A total of 163 patients were included: 50.3 % were female, 30.2 % were never smokers, 95.1 % had adenocarcinoma, and 78.2 % had a PDL1 ≥ 1 %. The median age was 68.3 years. At D-T initiation, 80.8 % of patients had a PS of 0/1, 78.6 % had stage IV disease, and 20.9 % had brain metastasis. At the cutoff, the median follow-up was 27.4 months. The 12-month OS rate in patients receiving D + T as a second-line therapy or beyond (n = 119) was 67.4 %, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 10.4 months. Among the 44 patients who received D + T as a first-line therapy, the 12-month OS rate was 67.4 %, with an mPFS of 18.2 months. D-T discontinuation for toxicity was reported in 10.3 % of patients.

To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective cohort of BRAF-mutated patients reported. The findings confirmed the significant efficacy of D-T in combination with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic NSCLC in pretreated and untreated patients. These results under real-world conditions are consistent with those of other registered studies.

The BRAF gene is an important signaling molecule in human cells that is involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. When the BRAF gene mutates, it can lead to abnormal activation of the signaling pathway, which promotes cell proliferation, inhibits cell apoptosis, and ultimately contributes to the occurrence and development of cancer. BRAF mutations are widely present in various cancers, including malignant melanoma, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and hairy cell leukemia, among others. BRAF is an important target for the treatment of various solid tumors, and targeted combination therapies, represented by BRAF inhibitors, have become one of the main treatment modalities for a variety of BRAF-mutation-positive solid tumors. Dabrafenib plus trametinib, as the first tumor-agnostic therapy, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 years and older harboring a BRAF V600E mutation with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This is also the first time a BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination has been approved for use in pediatric patients. As research into the diagnosis and treatment of BRAF mutations advances, standardizing the detection of BRAF mutations and the clinical application of BRAF inhibitors becomes increasingly important. Therefore, we have established a universal and systematic strategy for diagnosing and treating solid tumors with BRAF mutations. In this expert consensus, we (1) summarize the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of BRAF mutations in different solid tumors, (2) provide recommendations for the selection of genetic testing methods and platforms, and (3) establish a universal strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with solid tumors harboring BRAF mutations.

Lung cancer remains a significant health challenge, characterized by aberrant tissue growth within the pulmonary system. Early carcinogenic events often involve genomic instability and the emergence of a mutator phenotype. In this study, we aimed to explore the mutator phenotype in 89 patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RNA isolation from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples was performed using the Promega ReliaPrep RNA Miniprep System, facilitating gene amplification relevant to cancer through the Archer® FusionPlexComprehensiveThyroid and Lung (CTL) kit. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the Illumina NextSeq platform enabled comprehensive analysis of target areas. Utilizing Archer Analysis software, secondary analyses involving data cleansing, alignment, and variant/fusion identification were executed against the human reference genome hg19 (GRCh37). Expression patterns were visualized using HeatMap graphics. Our findings revealed a notable presence of KRAS gene mutations in approximately 20% of NSCLC patients. Among these mutations, the G12C variant was predominant at 50%, followed by G12V and G12D variants at 11.2% each. Notably, patients harboring the G12C variant responded favorably to sotorasib medication. These results underscore the importance of mutational profiling and targeted therapeutic approaches in managing NSCLC, particularly highlighting the promising efficacy of sotorasib in G12C-mutated cases.

Previous reports indicated still low implementation rates of multigene testing for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan.

This is a retrospective study launched at the initiative of lung cancer patients. Patients with stage IV NSCLC from January 2019 to December 2022 were investigated for testing of 8 actionable oncogenic drivers with targeted therapies available as of 2022.

A total of 15,719 patients were included. Between 2019 and 2022, the percentage of patients who were not tested for any actionable oncogenic drivers remained the same, ranging from 21.5% to 33.1%. However, since late 2021, the percentage of patients tested for five or more actionable oncogenic drivers has increased. Across hospital categories and regions, the number of actionable oncogenic drivers tested was similar.

This patient-initiated national survey in Japan reveals the recent nationwide increase in testing rates for actionable oncogenic drivers in Advanced NSCLC.

B-Raf mutation positivity, B-Raf mutation positivity occurrence with programmed death ligand 1 overexpression, and musculoskeletal metastasis are singly rare in non-small cell lung cancer, and even rarer is all occurring in one patient.

A Filipino 63-year-old male had B-Raf mutation positive and programmed death ligand 1 overexpressed symptomatic metastatic musculoskeletal lesions from lung adenocarcinoma treated with a BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab. He exhibited significant reduction in pain and burden of musculoskeletal metastatic lesions.

Although a rare occurrence and known to have a poor prognosis, B-Raf mutation positive programmed death ligand 1 overexpressed lung adenocarcinoma presenting with metastatic musculoskeletal lesions can respond favorably to a combination immune checkpoint inhibitor and BRAF inhibitor medication.

Lung cancer is responsible for a high burden of disease globally. Over the last two decades, the discovery of targetable oncogenic genomic alterations has revolutionized the treatment landscape for early-stage and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). New molecular drivers continue to emerge as promising therapeutic targets, including KRAS non-G12C, RAF/MEK, HER3, Nectin-4, folate receptor alpha, ITGB6, and PRMT5. In this review, we summarize the emerging molecular targets with a potential clinical impact in advanced NSCLC, elaborating on their clinical characteristics and specific mechanisms and molecular pathways for which targeted treatments are currently available. Additionally, we present an aggregate of ongoing clinical trials investigating the available treatment options targeting such alterations, in addition to their current recruitment status and preliminary efficacy data. These advancements may guide further research endeavors and inform future treatment strategies to improve the management of and transform outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Drs. Ramalingam and Carlisle discuss the incidence and pathophysiology of BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and current treatment options. The podcast provides an overview of the data from the recent Pfizer-sponsored phase 2 PHAROS (NCT03915951) study, which were the basis for the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of encorafenib plus binimetinib for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. An increasing understanding of relevant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biomarkers has led to the recent development of molecular-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors that have revolutionized treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic disease. The purpose of this review is to provide surgeons with a state-of-the-art understanding of the current medical and surgical treatment trends and their implications in the future of management of NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify English language articles published between January 2010 and March 2024 focusing on molecular markers, tumor targeting, and immunotherapy in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC. Case series, observational studies, randomized trials, guidelines, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. Results: There is now increasing data to suggest that molecular-targeted therapies and immune therapies have a role in the neoadjuvant setting. Advances in intraoperative imaging allow surgeons to perform increasingly parenchymal-sparing lung resections without compromising tumor margins. Liquid biopsies can noninvasively detect targetable mutations in cancer cells and DNA from a blood draw, potentially allowing for earlier diagnosis, personalized therapy, and long-term monitoring for disease recurrence. Conclusions: The management of NSCLC has advanced dramatically in recent years fueled by a growing understanding of the cancer biology of NSCLC. Advances in medical therapies, surgical techniques, and diagnostic and surveillance modalities continue to evolve but have already impacted current treatment strategies for NSCLC, which are encompassed in this review.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining represents a comparatively inexpensive testing method that is attractive as a potential alternative to molecular sequencing methods or fluorescence in situ hybridization for pulmonary biomarker testing. While a variety of IHC tests directed at actionable genetic alterations have been developed and evaluated since the advent of targeted therapy, specific antibody clones for anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ROS-1, and potentially neurotrophic tropmyosin receptor kinase have been the primary antibodies that provide sufficiently robust results to be utilized as either a primary testing or screening method to direct targeted therapy. Antibodies for a variety of other targets such as epidermal growth factor receptors, for example, have lacked sufficient sensitivity and specificity to cover the range of mutations that may occur and are generally not recommended in lieu of molecular testing with the exception of limited resource settings. IHC is also used as a predictive marker for response to immunotherapy through evaluation of programmed death ligand 1 expression. In addition, multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are under investigation, designed to deliver drugs directly to tumor cells through binding to specific target antigens. Some ADCs have already received accelerated FDA approval, and IHC was incorporated in many clinical trials evaluating ADC efficacy. As such, it is anticipated that ADCs may have a companion diagnostic IHC to guide patient selection.

Secondary BRAF variations have been identified as a mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with driver gene-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the characteristics and subsequent treatment strategies for these patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with driver gene-positive NSCLC who received TKIs therapy at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between May 2016 and December 2023. The clinical and genetic characteristics of these patients were assessed, along with the impact of various treatment strategies on survival. This study enrolled 27 patients with advanced NSCLC, in whom BRAF variations occurred at a median time of 28 months after the initiation of targeted therapy. The multivariate accelerated failure time (AFT) model revealed that, compared to chemotherapy-based regimens group, the combined targeted therapy group (p < 0.001) and the combined local treatment group for oligo-progression (p < 0.001) significantly extended patient survival. In contrast, continuing the original signaling pathway's targeted monotherapy was associated with shorter survival (p = 0.034). The median global OS for each treatment group was as follows: chemotherapy-based regimens group, 45 months; combined targeted therapy group, 59 months; combined local treatment group for patients with oligo-progression, 46 months; and targeted monotherapy group, 36 months. Study results indicate that the combination targeted therapy group (including TKIs, BRAF inhibitors, and/or MEK inhibitors) and the localized treatment group are more effective than traditional chemotherapy-based regimens in improving survival. Additionally, continuing targeted monotherapy along the original signaling pathway proves less effective than chemotherapy-based regimens.

The regulatory significance of ubiquitin-specific peptidase 32 (USP32) in tumor is significant, nevertheless, the biological roles and regulatory mechanisms of USP32 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. According to our research, USP32 was strongly expressed in NSCLC cell lines and tissues and was linked to a bad prognosis for NSCLC patients. Interference with USP32 resulted in a significant inhibition of NSCLC cell proliferation, migration potential, and EMT development; on the other hand, USP32 overexpression had the opposite effect. To further elucidate the mechanism of action of USP32 in NSCLC, we screened H1299 cells for interacting proteins and found that USP32 interacts with BAG3 (Bcl2-associated athanogene 3) and deubiquitinates and stabilizes BAG3 in a deubiquitinating activity-dependent manner. Functionally, restoration of BAG3 expression abrogated the antitumor effects of USP32 silencing. Furthermore, USP32 increased the phosphorylation level of the RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway in NSCLC cells by stabilizing BAG3. In summary, these findings imply that USP32 is critical to the development of NSCLC and could offer a theoretical framework for the clinical diagnosis and management of NSCLC patients in the future.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common subtype of lung cancer with a generally poor prognosis. In recent years, advances in targeted therapy and sequencing technology have brought significant improvement in the therapeutic outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted inhibitors directed against specific mutated or rearranged oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and receptor tyrosine kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1(ROS1) among others, exhibit promising anti-tumor activity. Unfortunately, some patients develop acquired resistance and disease progression soon after initial remission. Despite the continuous development of new drugs and strategies to overcome drug resistance, it is still a major challenge in the treatment of NSCLC. The landscape of targeted therapy for NSCLC is evolving rapidly in response to the pace of scientific research. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of tumor target antigens and agents related to targeted therapy in NSCLC.

BRAF is a serine-threonine kinase implicated in the regulation of MAPK signaling cascade. BRAF mutation-driven activation occurs in approximately 2-4% of treatment-naive non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLCs). BRAF upregulation is also often observed in tumors with acquired resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

This review describes the spectrum of BRAF mutations and their functional roles, discusses treatment options available for BRAF p.V600 and non-V600 mutated NSCLCs, and identifies some gaps in the current knowledge.

Administration of combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors usually produces significant, although often a short-term, benefit to NSCLC patients with BRAF V600 (class 1) mutations. There are no established treatments for BRAF class 2 (L597, K601, G464, G469A/V/R/S, fusions, etc.) and class 3 (D594, G596, G466, etc.) mutants, which account for up to two-thirds of BRAF-driven NSCLCs. Many important issues related to the use of immune therapy for the management of BRAF-mutated NSCLC deserve further investigation. The rare occurrence of BRAF mutations in NSCLC is compensated by high overall incidence of lung cancer disease; therefore, clinical studies on BRAF-associated NSCLC are feasible.

Genomic mutations impact non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biology. The influence of sex and age on the distribution of these alterations is unclear. We analyzed circulating-tumor DNA from individuals with advanced NSCLC from March 2018 to October 2020. EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, ERBB2, RET, MET, PIK3CA, STK11, and TP53 alterations were assessed. We evaluated the differences by sex and age (<70 and ≥70) using Fisher's exact test. Of the 34,277 samples, 30,790 (89.83%) had a detectable mutation and 19,923 (58.12%) had an alteration of interest. The median age of the ctDNA positive population was 69 (18-102), 16,756 (54.42%) were female, and 28,835 (93.65%) had adenocarcinoma. Females had more alterations in all the assessed EGFR mutations, KRAS G12C, and ERBB2 ex20 ins. Males had higher numbers of MET amp and alterations in STK11 and TP53. Patients <70 years were more likely to have alterations in EGFR exon 19 del/exon 20 ins/T790M, KRAS G12C/D, ALK, ROS1, BRAF V600E, ERBB2 Ex20ins, MET amp, STK11, and TP53. Individuals ≥70 years were more likely to have alterations in EGFR L861Q, MET exon 14 skipping, and PIK3CA. We provided evidence of sex- and age-associated differences in the distribution of genomic alterations in individuals with advanced NSCLC.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in both men and women, however mortality in the US and EU are recently declining in parallel with the gradual cut of smoking prevalence. Consequently, the relative frequency of adenocarcinoma increased while that of squamous and small cell carcinomas declined. During the last two decades a plethora of targeted drug therapies have appeared for the treatment of metastasizing non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Personalized oncology aims to precisely match patients to treatments with the highest potential of success. Extensive research is done to introduce biomarkers which can predict the effectiveness of a specific targeted therapeutic approach. The EGFR signaling pathway includes several sufficient targets for the treatment of human cancers including NSCLC. Lung adenocarcinoma may harbor both activating and resistance mutations of the EGFR gene, and further, mutations of KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. Less frequent but targetable genetic alterations include ALK, ROS1, RET gene rearrangements, and various alterations of MET proto-oncogene. In addition, the importance of anti-tumor immunity and of tumor microenvironment has become evident recently. Accumulation of mutations generally trigger tumor specific immune defense, but immune protection may be upregulated as an aggressive feature. The blockade of immune checkpoints results in potential reactivation of tumor cell killing and induces significant tumor regression in various tumor types, such as lung carcinoma. Therapeutic responses to anti PD1-PD-L1 treatment may correlate with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor cells. Due to the wide range of diagnostic and predictive features in lung cancer a plenty of tests are required from a single small biopsy or cytology specimen, which is challenged by major issues of sample quantity and quality. Thus, the efficacy of biomarker testing should be warranted by standardized policy and optimal material usage. In this review we aim to discuss major targeted therapy-related biomarkers in NSCLC and testing possibilities comprehensively.

Tunlametinib (HL-085) is a novel, highly selective MEK inhibitor with substantial clinical activities in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. This phase I study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of tunlametinib plus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors.

Patients with confirmed advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors who had progressed on or shown intolerance or no available standard therapies were enrolled and received tunlametinib plus vemurafenib. This study consisted of a dose-escalation phase and a dose-expansion phase. Primary end points of this study were safety, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy.

From August 17, 2018 to April 19, 2022, 72 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The RP2D for BRAF V600-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was tunlametinib 9 mg plus vemurafenib 720 mg, twice daily (BID, bis in die). Until the data cut-off date of December 15, 2023, of 33 NSCLC patients with evaluable disease, the objective response rate (ORR) was 60.6% (20/33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42.1-77.1), the median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6-14.5) and median duration of response (DoR) was 11.3 months (95%CI, 6.8-NE). At the RP2D, ORR was 60.0% (9/15; 95% CI, 32.3-83.7), the median PFS was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6 -NE) and median DoR was 11.3 months (95%CI, 3.9-NE). Of 24 colorectal cancer patients with evaluable disease, the ORR was 25.0% (6/24; 95% CI, 5.6-NE). All 72 patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and the most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were anemia (n = 13, 18.1%) and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (n = 10, 13.9%). Tunlametinib was absorbed rapidly with Tmax of 0.5-1 h. Vemurafeinib did not influence the system exposure of tunlametinib and vice versa, indicating no drug-drug interaction for this combination.

Tunlametinib (HL-085) plus vemurafenib had a favorable safety profile and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. The RP2D for NSCLC was tunlametinib 9 mg BID plus vemurafeinib 720 mg BID.

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03781219.

Aim: We retrospectively evaluated the effect of dabrafenib/trametinib combination in patients with BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in a single center from 2017 to 2022.Patients: The response and safety data of 42 patients (27 treated in first-line and 15 as second/subsequent lines) were analyzed.Results: The objective response was 73.8%, with no differences between patients undergoing first- or second-line. A longer, statistically significant median progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in patients receiving the combination in first-line vs those in the second/subsequent lines (19.9 months [95% CI: 19.7-20] vs 13.1 months [95% CI: 8.6-17.6], respectively; p = 0.012). The median overall survival (OS) was 29.9 months (95% CI: 14.1-45.7) for patients treated with the combination in first-line and 22.4 months (95% CI: 14.6-30.2) for those treated in subsequent lines. The combination was well toleratedConclusion: We confirm the efficacy of dabrafenib/trametinib in BRAF-V600-mutated NSCLC.

In this review, we cover the current understanding of BRAF mutations and associated clinical characteristics in patients with metastatic NSCLC, approved and emerging treatment options, BRAF sequencing approaches, and unmet needs. The BRAFV600E mutation confers constitutive activity of the MAPK pathway, leading to enhanced growth, proliferation, and survival of tumor cells. Testing for BRAF mutations enables patients to be treated with therapies that directly target BRAFV600E and the MAPK pathway, but BRAF testing lags behind other oncogene testing in metastatic NSCLC. Additional therapies targeting BRAFV600E mutations provide options for patients with metastatic NSCLC. Emerging therapies and combinations under investigation could potentially overcome issues of resistance and target non-V600E mutations. Therefore, because targeted therapies with enhanced efficacy are on the horizon, being able to identify BRAF mutations in metastatic NSCLC may become even more important.

Resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a significant challenge in the treatment of this disease. The mechanisms of resistance are multifactorial and include molecular target alterations and activation of alternative pathways, tumor heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment change, immune evasion, and immunosuppression. Promising strategies for overcoming resistance include the development of combination therapies, understanding the resistance mechanisms to better use novel drug targets, the identification of biomarkers, the modulation of the tumor microenvironment and so on. Ongoing research into the mechanisms of resistance and the development of new therapeutic approaches hold great promise for improving outcomes for patients with NSCLC. Here, we summarize diverse mechanisms driving resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC and the latest potential and promising strategies to overcome the resistance to help patients who suffer from NSCLC.