|
1
|
Biederman EB, Stump TE, Monahan PO, Katz ML, Baltic RD, Vachon EA, Champion VL, Paskett ED. A Randomized Control Trial of Two Interventions Compared with Usual Care for Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening among Women Living in the Rural Midwest. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025; 34:952-961. [PMID: 40197927 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-24-0971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Revised: 10/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower cervical cancer screening rates are associated with higher cervical cancer mortality among women living in rural compared with urban areas (defined by rural-urban community codes). The study purpose was to examine the effectiveness of a mailed digital video disc (DVD) versus DVD plus patient navigation (PN) versus usual care (UC) on increasing the percentage of rural women up to date (UTD) with cervical cancer screening guidelines. METHODS Rural women (ages 50-74 years) who were not UTD for cervical cancer screening (n = 553) were consented and randomized 2:2:1 (DVD, DVD + PN, and UC, respectively). Baseline and 12-month surveys included sociodemographic characteristics, history of previous cervical cancer screening, and cervical cancer screening knowledge and beliefs. Screening status was assessed by medical record review at baseline and 12 months after randomization. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 59.8 years. After controlling for covariates, women randomized to the DVD + PN group had greater odds [OR = 5.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.38-11.50] of being UTD with cervical cancer screening compared with UC at 12 months after randomization. Other significant covariates in the model included having a college versus high school or lower education (OR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.08-5.63), private (OR = 4.16; 95% CI, 1.28-19.1) or no insurance (OR = 8.74; 95% CI, 1.77-51.9) versus public insurance, normal (OR = 3.25; 95% CI, 1.46-7.24) or overweight (OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.05-4.42) versus obese body mass index, and positive screening intention in the next six months (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.48-4.52). CONCLUSIONS A DVD + PN intervention increased the percentage of rural women UTD with cervical cancer screening compared with UC or DVD only. IMPACT Women who have a high school or lower education, were on public insurance, obese, and not planning to be screened need increased attention to become UTD with cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy E Stump
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine and Fairbanks School of Public Health Biostatistics and Data Management Core, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine and Fairbanks School of Public Health Biostatistics and Data Management Core, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mira L Katz
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University (OSU) and The OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Eric A Vachon
- Indiana University School of Nursing and Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Victoria L Champion
- Indiana University School of Nursing and IU Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Electra D Paskett
- College of Medicine and The Ohio State University (OSU) Comprehensive Cancer Center Suite, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Coronado GD, Petrik AF, Leo MC, Coury J, Durr R, Badicke B, Thompson JH, Edelmann AC, Davis MM. Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e250928. [PMID: 40094661 PMCID: PMC11915063 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance Approximately 60 million adults live in rural regions of the US, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and follow-up. Rural residents enrolled in Medicaid have particularly low CRC screening and follow-up rates. Objective To determine the effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative Medicaid health plan-clinic program of mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result when implemented in rural clinics as part of standard care. Design, Setting, and Participants This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted at 28 rural clinic units in Oregon affiliated with 3 Medicaid health plans. The clinics were randomized to the intervention (n = 14) or to usual care (n = 14). Participants were Medicaid enrollees (aged 50-75 years) due for CRC screening. The intervention was delivered from May 11, 2021, through June 4, 2022, and analyses were performed from June 2023 through September 2024. Intervention The stepwise intervention involved (1) mailed FIT outreach and (2) patient navigation to colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result. Implementation support included practice facilitation, training, collaborative learning, and patient tracking tools. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary effectiveness outcome was completion of any CRC screening within 6 months of eligibility determination. An additional effectiveness outcome was follow-up colonoscopy completion within 6 months of an abnormal FIT result. Implementation was measured as (1) the proportion of intervention-eligible enrollees who were mailed an FIT and who were sent an advance notification or reminder and (2) the proportion with an abnormal FIT result who were offered patient navigation. Results This study included 5614 Medicaid enrollees (2613 in intervention clinics and 3001 in usual care clinics). Enrollees had a mean (SD) age of 58.2 (5.5) years; most (4940 [88.0%]) were aged 50 to 64 years. A total of 2948 enrollees (52.5%) were female, 325 (6.2%) were Hispanic and 3774 (67.2%) were White, and 4457 (79.4%) lived in rural regions. Compared with Medicaid enrollees in usual care clinics, enrollees in intervention clinics had a higher adjusted 6-month proportion of any CRC screening completion (11.8% vs 4.5%; difference, 7.3 [95% CI, 5.3-9.2] percentage points). Implementation was 100% (all 1489 intervention-eligible enrollees) for mailed FIT outreach, 88.5% for advance notification, 78.1% for reminders, and 57.9% for patient navigation. Conclusions and Relevance In this cluster randomized clinical trial of rural clinics, mailed FIT outreach and patient navigation boosted participation in CRC screening among Medicaid enrollees. More efforts are needed to address low participation in both FIT testing and follow-up colonoscopy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04890054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael C. Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Robert Durr
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Portland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Tinsley SA, Dankerlui D, Romain C, Ruffin W, Brown E, Burnett C, Long D, Yacobucci K, Clement J, Fasakin A, Makinde-Odusola B, Williams E, Fields T, Abdollah F, Moore D, Hwang C, Walker EM. Increasing Prostate Cancer Education and Screening for Black Men in Southeastern Michigan: Your Prostate, Your Health. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2025:10.1007/s13187-025-02588-0. [PMID: 40019704 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-025-02588-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025]
Abstract
Black Men (BM) have disproportionately higher mortality rates from prostate cancer (PCa) and present with more advanced disease. Early screening may improve outcomes. The aim of our project was to provide education, screening, and provider outreach with a long-term goal to decrease the disproportionate number of PCa deaths in BM. We conducted focus group discussions with BM to assess their perceptions and understanding of PCa and screening. Focus groups aided in the development of educational materials. Educational materials were distributed at community events. Screening was offered, at select events, using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Men with PSA levels of ≥ 4 ng/ml were contacted for follow-up. The project included training for Henry Ford Health (HFH) providers and an assessment of their PCa screening practice. We completed 4 focus groups and distributed ~ 1000 PCa educational brochures. We participated in 45 community events between March 2022 to June 30, 2023. 340 men were screened. 28 men had an elevated PSA, and 17 men did not complete follow-up. Multiple HFH provider educational sessions were conducted. Of 129 providers who completed a screening practice assessment, 78 (60%) routinely offered PSA screening to men between ages 55-69. Between 2018 to 2023 at HFH, the PSA screening rate overall increased from 8.2% to 12.7%. Although our outreach efforts were effective at increasing PSA screening, 60.7% of men screened in our community events with elevated PSA did not follow-up. Future efforts should further reduce barriers to PCa screening and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane A Tinsley
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
- Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Doreen Dankerlui
- Global Health Initiative, Henry Ford International, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Wilma Ruffin
- Henry Ford Health Innovation Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Eric Brown
- Henry Ford Cancer, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Donna Long
- Henry Ford Cancer, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Jaye Clement
- Office of Community Health, Henry Ford Health, Equity & Wellness, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Eric Williams
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Tiffany Fields
- Henry Ford Cancer, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
- Michigan State University College Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Daniel Moore
- Michigan State University College Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Clara Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA
- Michigan State University College Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Eleanor M Walker
- Henry Ford Cancer, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
- Michigan State University College Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health Cancer, 2800 W. Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Bandiera C, Mistry SK, Harris E, Harris MF, Aslani P. Interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and community health workers: a scoping review. Int J Equity Health 2025; 24:23. [PMID: 39838436 PMCID: PMC11752743 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02377-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/23/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Community health workers (CHWs) help bridge the cultural gap between health services and the communities they serve. CHWs work with physicians, nurses and social workers, but little is known about their collaboration with pharmacists. This scoping review aims to describe the interprofessional collaboration between CHWs and pharmacists, the types of interventions they deliver and CHWs' and pharmacists' specific roles within these interventions. METHOD The scientific literature published in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL and the grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were that the research (i) involved pharmacists and CHWs working collaboratively and (ii) included an intervention, service or program. One researcher screened all articles, and two reviewers screened 6% of articles (20/340) assessed for eligibility, using the software Covidence. After the discrepancies were resolved, data from the included articles were extracted using a customized template for data extraction and synthesized narratively. RESULTS Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the USA (14/18) and were published since 2020 (12/18). Most interventions involved medication reviews, support for medication adherence, disease prevention or addressing the social determinants of health. Pharmacists had primarily clinical roles (i.e., medication reconciliation and patient education), while the CHWs' roles consisted of collecting patient information, supporting patient self-management, bridging the cultural gap by translating information in the patient's language and ensuring patient follow-up. The collaborative practice occurred via interprofessional referral, ranging from the CHW facilitating the link between the patient and the pharmacist, and information sharing between the CHW and the pharmacist, to an interprofessional collaborative practice where CHWs and pharmacists delivered the intervention together. CONCLUSION While CHWs and pharmacists had independent roles as part of the interventions, they also collaborated at various levels to deliver services to patients. CHWs have an important role to play in bridging the cultural gap between the patient and the pharmacist, in improving patient referral so that more patients can benefit from pharmaceutical services, and in identifying patients' social determinants of health. CHWs and pharmacists can work synergistically and collaboratively to tailor an intervention to the patient's needs, which can improve and optimize pharmaceutical services, and may ultimately positively impact health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Bandiera
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Sabuj Kanti Mistry
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Harris
- International Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark F Harris
- International Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Parisa Aslani
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Mboineki JF, Chen C. Preparing patient navigators and assessing the impact of patient navigation in promoting cervical cancer screening uptake, knowledge, awareness, intention, and health beliefs: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Front Glob Womens Health 2024; 5:1209441. [PMID: 39698449 PMCID: PMC11652523 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1209441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim There are limited studies in Tanzania concerning the modality of preparing patient navigators and the influence of patient navigation strategies on cervical cancer screening. This protocol describes the preparation of patient navigators and assesses the impact of a patient navigation strategy on promoting cervical cancer screening uptake, knowledge, awareness, intention, and health beliefs. Design This is a protocol for a community-based randomized controlled trial. Methods The method is categorized into two phases. (1) Preparing patient navigators, which will involve the training of five patient navigators guided by a validated training manual. The training will be conducted over three consecutive days, covering the basic concepts of cervical cancer screening and guiding navigators on how to implement a patient navigation strategy in the communities. (2) Delivering a patient navigation intervention to community women (COMW) which will involve health education, screening appointments, navigation services, and counseling. The study will recruit 202 COMW who will be randomized 1:1 by computer-based blocks to either the patient navigation intervention group or the control group. Public contribution The study will prove that the trained patient navigators are easily accessible and offer timely and culturally acceptable services to promote cervical cancer screening uptake in communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanes Faustine Mboineki
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Changying Chen
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Jacobson CE, Harbaugh CM, Agbedinu K, Kwakye G. Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Comparative Review of Resource-Limited Settings in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Rural America. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3302. [PMID: 39409921 PMCID: PMC11475417 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2024] [Revised: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings where patient-centered outcomes following surgery are often suboptimal. Although more prevalent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), segments of the United States have similarly limited healthcare resources, resulting in stark inequities even within close geographic proximity. Methods: This review compares and contrasts colorectal cancer outcomes in LMICs with those in resource-constrained communities in rural America, utilizing an established implementation science framework to identify key determinants of practice for delivering high-quality colorectal cancer care. Results: Barriers and innovative, community-based strategies aimed at improving patient-centered outcomes for colorectal cancer patients in low resource settings are identified. We explore innovative approaches and community-based strategies aimed at improving patient-centered outcomes, highlighting the newly developed colorectal surgery fellowship in Sub-Saharan Africa as a model of innovation in this field. Conclusions: By exploring these diverse contexts, this paper proposes actionable solutions and strategies to enhance surgical care of colorectal cancer and patient outcomes, ultimately aiming to inform global health practices, inspire collaboration between LMIC and rural communities, and improve care delivery across various resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare E. Jacobson
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Calista M. Harbaugh
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kwabena Agbedinu
- Directorate of Surgery, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi 23321, Ghana
| | - Gifty Kwakye
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Global Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Chu JN, Tsoh JY, Shariff-Marco S, Allen L, Oh D, Kuo MC, Wong C, Bui H, Chen J, Truong A, Wang K, Hwang A, Li FM, Ma C, Gomez SL, Nguyen TT. Patient COUNTS: A pilot navigation program for Asian American cancer patients. ASIAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2024; 15:205-212. [PMID: 39387093 PMCID: PMC11460540 DOI: 10.1037/aap0000319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
Abstract
Many Asian American cancer patients face barriers to cancer care but little is known about their navigational needs. We designed and implemented a pilot study to provide culturally- and linguistically-appropriate navigation for Asian American cancer patients. We recruited Asian American adults age 21+ years, who spoke English, Cantonese, Mandarin, or Vietnamese, with newly diagnosed, stage I-III colorectal, liver, or lung cancer in the Northern California Bay Area. Participants were assigned a language-concordant patient navigator, who provided support and resources over 6 months. Surveys were administered at baseline, 3-, and 6-months to assess sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare access, quality of life (FACT-G), and cancer care needs. Participants' mean age was 65 years (range 38-81); 62% were men, 67% spoke Chinese, and 75% reported limited English proficiency. Forty-two percent of participants had lung, 38% colorectal, and 21% liver cancer. Of 24 participants who enrolled, 67% completed the program and 75% completed standard of care cancer treatment. The average total FACT-G score was 72.6 (SD 17) at baseline, 68.0 (SD 20) at 3 months, and 69.9 (SD 22) at 6 months. All participants reported that the program was culturally appropriate and would recommend it. Asian American cancer patients in a patient navigation program reported lower quality of life compared to the general adult cancer population. Even with navigation, 75% of participants reported completing standard of care treatment. While participants were satisfied with the program, more research is needed to address the quality of cancer care Asian American cancer patients receive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet N. Chu
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
- Asian American Research Center on Health
| | - Janice Y. Tsoh
- Asian American Research Center on Health
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco
| | - Salma Shariff-Marco
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Laura Allen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Debora Oh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Mei-Chin Kuo
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Ching Wong
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
- Asian American Research Center on Health
| | - Hoan Bui
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
- Asian American Research Center on Health
| | - Junlin Chen
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
| | | | - Katarina Wang
- Asian American Research Center on Health
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | | | | | - Carmen Ma
- Asian American Research Center on Health
| | - Scarlett L. Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Tung. T Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
- Asian American Research Center on Health
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Grant SJ, Yanguela J, Odebunmi O, Grimshaw AA, Giri S, Wheeler SB. Systematic Review of Interventions Addressing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care and Health Outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1563-1574. [PMID: 38382005 PMCID: PMC11095878 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer health disparities result from complex interactions among socioeconomic, behavioral, and biological factors, disproportionately affecting marginalized racial and ethnic groups. The objective of this review is to synthesize existing evidence on interventions addressing racial or ethnic disparities in cancer-related health care access and clinical outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection was conducted from database inception to February 23, 2023. Controlled vocabulary and keywords helped to identify studies on cancer-related disparities and interventions in adults age 18 years or older. Two reviewers followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Of 7,526 screened studies, 34 met the inclusion criteria involving 24,134 participants. Most studies focused on breast cancer (n = 17) and Hispanic/Latino populations (n = 10) and enrolled participants primarily from community-based sites (n = 19). Twenty-one studies examined patient-centered outcomes, such as health-related quality of life and psychological well-being, while 15 studies assessed process-of-care outcomes, such as timeliness of care. Most studies followed a community-based participatory research framework. Five patient-centered outcome studies reported a positive intervention effect, often combining cancer education with psychological well-being interventions. Among the 15 process-of-care outcome studies, nine reported positive effects, with the majority (n = 8) being navigation-based interventions. CONCLUSION This systematic review emphasizes the vital role of community partnerships in addressing racial and ethnic disparities in oncology care and highlights the need for standardized approaches in intervention research because of the heterogeneity of studied interventions. Furthermore, the prevailing emphasis on breast cancer and Hispanic populations indicates the need for future investigations into other priority demographic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shakira J. Grant
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Juan Yanguela
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Olufeyisayo Odebunmi
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Alyssa A. Grimshaw
- Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Smith Giri
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes & Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Varanasi AP, Burhansstipanov L, Dorn C, Gentry S, Capossela MA, Fox K, Wilson D, Tanjasiri S, Odumosu O, Saavedra Ferrer EL. Patient navigation job roles by levels of experience: Workforce Development Task Group, National Navigation Roundtable. Cancer 2024; 130:1549-1567. [PMID: 38306297 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Cancer patient navigators work in diverse settings ranging from community-based programs to comprehensive cancer centers to improve outcomes in underserved populations by eliminating barriers to timely cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship in a culturally appropriate and competent manner. This article clarifies the roles and responsibilities of Entry, Intermediate, and Advanced level cancer patient navigators. The competencies described in this article apply to patient navigators, nurse navigators, and social work navigators. This article provides a resource for administrators to create job descriptions for navigators with specific levels of expertise and for patient navigators to advance their oncology careers and attain a higher level of expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carrie Dorn
- National Association of Social Workers, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sharon Gentry
- Academy of Oncology Nurse and Patient Navigators (AONN+), Lewisville, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Kyandra Fox
- Patient Navigation, Education and Training, Susan G. Komen Foundation, Allen, Texas, USA
| | - Donna Wilson
- HCA Henrico Doctors' Hospital/Virginia Cancer Patient Navigator Network (VaCPNN), Midlothian, Virginia, USA
| | - Sora Tanjasiri
- Department of Health, Society and Behavior, University of Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | | | - Elba L Saavedra Ferrer
- College of Education and Human Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Patel MI, Kapphahn K, Wood E, Coker T, Salava D, Riley A, Krajcinovic I. Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Intervention Among Low-Income and Minoritized Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:518-528. [PMID: 37625110 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether a community health worker (CHW)-led intervention could improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL; primary outcome) more than usual care among low-income and racial and ethnic minoritized populations newly diagnosed with cancer. METHODS This randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 1, 2018, until August 31, 2021, in outpatient cancer clinics in Atlantic City, NJ, and Chicago, IL. Hourly low-wage worker members of an employer union health fund age 18 years or older with newly diagnosed solid tumor and hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned 1:1 to usual care (control group) or usual care augmented with a trained CHW for 12 months (intervention group). The CHW assisted participants with advance care planning (ACP), proactively screened symptoms, and referred participants to community-based resources for identified health-related social needs. Usual care comprised nurse case management and benefits redesign (waived copayments and free transportation for any cancer care received at preferred oncology clinics in each city). The primary outcome was HRQoL. Secondary outcomes included patient activation, satisfaction with decision, ACP documentation, health care use, total health care costs, and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 160 participants were enrolled. Intervention group participants had a greater increase in mean HRQoL scores at 4-month and 12-month follow-up as compared with baseline than control group participants (expected mean difference, 11.25 [95% CI, 7.28 to 15.22]; 11.29 [95% CI, 6.96 to 15.62], respectively). CONCLUSION In this randomized trial, a CHW-led intervention significantly improved HRQoL for low-income and racial and ethnic minoritized patients with cancer more than usual care alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manali I Patel
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Medical Services, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Kris Kapphahn
- Qualitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Emily Wood
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Tumaini Coker
- Seattle Childrens Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Graboyes EM, Chappell M, Duckett KA, Sterba K, Halbert CH, Hill EG, Chera B, McCay J, Puram SV, Ramadan S, Sandulache VC, Kahmke R, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Paskett ED, Calhoun E. Patient Navigation for Timely, Guideline-Adherent Adjuvant Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A National Landscape Analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:1251-1259.e5. [PMID: 38081134 PMCID: PMC10846494 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aligned with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Head and Neck Cancers, in November 2021 the Commission on Cancer approved initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) as its first and only HNC quality metric. Unfortunately, >50% of patients do not commence PORT within 6 weeks, and delays disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minority groups. Although patient navigation (PN) is a potential strategy to improve the delivery of timely, equitable, guideline-adherent PORT, the national landscape of PN for this aspect of care is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS From September through November 2022, we conducted a survey of health care organizations that participate in the American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable to understand the scope of PN for delivering timely, guideline-adherent PORT for patients with HNC. RESULTS Of the 94 institutions that completed the survey, 89.4% (n=84) reported that at least part of their practice was dedicated to navigating patients with HNC. Sixty-eight percent of the institutions who reported navigating patients with HNC along the continuum (56/83) reported helping them begin PORT. One-third of HNC navigators (32.5%; 27/83) reported tracking the metric for time-to-PORT at their facility. When estimating the timeframe in which the NCCN and Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend commencing PORT, 44.0% (37/84) of HNC navigators correctly stated ≤6 weeks; 71.4% (60/84) reported that they did not know the frequency of delays starting PORT among patients with HNC nationally, and 63.1% (53/84) did not know the frequency of delays at their institution. CONCLUSIONS In this national landscape survey, we identified that PN is already widely used in clinical practice to help patients with HNC start timely, guideline-adherent PORT. To enhance and scale PN within this area and improve the quality and equity of HNC care delivery, organizations could focus on providing better education and support for their navigators as well as specialization in HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Michelle Chappell
- American Cancer Society National Navigation Roundtable, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kelsey A. Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Katherine Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth G. Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Bhishamjit Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Jessica McCay
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Sidharth V. Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Salma Ramadan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Vlad C. Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas
| | - Anthony J. Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Division of Cancer Prevention Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Elizabeth Calhoun
- Department of Population Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Taafaki MR, Taira D, Braun KL. Scoping Review of Interventional Studies in Chronic Disease for Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, and Filipino Populations in the United States. HAWAI'I JOURNAL OF HEALTH & SOCIAL WELFARE 2023; 82:58-66. [PMID: 37901666 PMCID: PMC10612424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Native Hawaiians (NHs), Pacific Islanders (PIs), and Filipinos experience health disparities in the United States (US) and need interventions that work for them. The purpose of this paper is to present a review of interventions designed to address chronic disease in Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, and Filipino populations in the US that were tested for clinical impact through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Articles were identified through a search of 4 databases, citation chasing, and colleagues. The 23 included articles reported on 21 interventions addressing 4 chronic conditions-cancer, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. All projects were guided by advisory groups, and all interventions were theory-based and tailored to the population, with culturally- and language-appropriate educational materials delivered by same-race individuals in familiar church, club, or home settings. About half were tested through cluster RCT. The majority of the interventions were successful, confirming the value of developing and delivering interventions in partnership with community. Given the growing numbers of NHs, PIs, and Filipinos in the US, more investigational studies are needed to develop and test culturally tailored and grounded interventions that meet the health needs of these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munirih R. Taafaki
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (MRT)
| | - Deborah Taira
- Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy, University of Hawai’i at Hilo, Hilo, HI (DT)
| | - Kathryn L. Braun
- Thompson School of Social Work & Public Health, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (KLB)
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Mosquera I, Todd A, Balaj M, Zhang L, Benitez Majano S, Mensah K, Eikemo TA, Basu P, Carvalho AL. Components and effectiveness of patient navigation programmes to increase participation to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review. Cancer Med 2023; 12:14584-14611. [PMID: 37245225 PMCID: PMC10358261 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality can be partly explained by unequal access to high-quality health services, including cancer screening. Several interventions have been described to increase access to cancer screening, among them patient navigation (PN), a barrier-focused intervention. This systematic review aimed to identify the reported components of PN and to assess the effectiveness of PN to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening. METHODS We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection databases. The components of PN programmes were identified, including the types of barriers addressed by navigators. The percentage change in screening participation was calculated. RESULTS The 44 studies included were mainly on colorectal cancer and were conducted in the USA. All described their goals and community characteristics, and the majority reported the setting (97.7%), monitoring and evaluation (97.7%), navigator background and qualifications (81.4%) and training (79.1%). Supervision was only referred to in 16 studies (36.4%). Programmes addressed mainly barriers at the educational (63.6%) and health system level (61.4%), while only 25.0% reported providing social and emotional support. PN increased cancer screening participation when compared with usual care (0.4% to 250.6% higher) and educational interventions (3.3% to 3558.0% higher). CONCLUSION Patient navigation programmes are effective at increasing participation to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening. A standardized reporting of the components of PN programmes would allow their replication and a better measure of their impact. Understanding the local context and needs is essential to design a successful PN programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Mosquera
- Early Detection, Prevention & Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Adam Todd
- School of PharmacyNewcastle University, Newcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Mirza Balaj
- Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
| | - Li Zhang
- Early Detection, Prevention & Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Sara Benitez Majano
- Noncommunicable Diseases, Violence and Injuries Prevention Unit, Pan American Health OrganizationWashingtonDCUSA
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Keitly Mensah
- Early Detection, Prevention & Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Terje Andreas Eikemo
- Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
| | - Partha Basu
- Early Detection, Prevention & Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | - Andre L. Carvalho
- Early Detection, Prevention & Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Kim J, Han J. The effectiveness of patient navigation services in reducing cancer screening disparities among Asian Americans. ETHNICITY & HEALTH 2023; 28:635-649. [PMID: 36149361 DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2022.2122409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient navigation has served as a useful intervention to reduce cancer disparities among diverse ethnic groups. Previous studies have consistently shown the effectiveness of patient navigation in reducing cancer disparities for ethnic minorities; however, few studies have been conducted for cancer screening behaviors focusing on the Asian population. This study aims to identify the overall effectiveness of patient navigation in cancer screening behaviors among Asian Americans through meta-analyses. In addition, this study examines the moderating effects of the type of cancers on cancer screening behaviors. DESIGN For data analyses, we selected 15 studies through a systematic review and meta-analyses, searching the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Random-effects models were used for meta-analyses. RESULTS The results showed that Asian Americans who received patient navigation were more likely to participate in cancer screening behaviors than those who did not receive patient navigation regardless of the type of cancer. Publication bias was tested using a funnel plot, meta-regression, and Failsafe-N. No notable publication bias was found. CONCLUSION This study can provide comprehensive evidence regarding the overall effectiveness of patient navigation in cancer screening behaviors of Asian Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhyun Kim
- Social Welfare, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Jina Han
- Social Welfare, Silla University, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Okasako-Schmucker DL, Peng Y, Cobb J, Buchanan LR, Xiong KZ, Mercer SL, Sabatino SA, Melillo S, Remington PL, Kumanyika SK, Glenn B, Breslau ES, Escoffery C, Fernandez ME, Coronado GD, Glanz K, Mullen PD, Vernon SW. Community Health Workers to Increase Cancer Screening: 3 Community Guide Systematic Reviews. Am J Prev Med 2023; 64:579-594. [PMID: 36543699 PMCID: PMC10033345 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many in the U.S. are not up to date with cancer screening. This systematic review examined the effectiveness of interventions engaging community health workers to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. METHODS Authors identified relevant publications from previous Community Guide systematic reviews of interventions to increase cancer screening (1966 through 2013) and from an update search (January 2014-November 2021). Studies written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals were included if they assessed interventions implemented in high-income countries; reported screening for breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer; and engaged community health workers to implement part or all of the interventions. Community health workers needed to come from or have close knowledge of the intervention community. RESULTS The review included 76 studies. Interventions engaging community health workers increased screening use for breast (median increase=11.5 percentage points, interquartile interval=5.5‒23.5), cervical (median increase=12.8 percentage points, interquartile interval=6.4‒21.0), and colorectal cancers (median increase=10.5 percentage points, interquartile interval=4.5‒17.5). Interventions were effective whether community health workers worked alone or as part of a team. Interventions increased cancer screening independent of race or ethnicity, income, or insurance status. DISCUSSION Interventions engaging community health workers are recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force to increase cancer screening. These interventions are typically implemented in communities where people are underserved to improve health and can enhance health equity. Further training and financial support for community health workers should be considered to increase cancer screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon L Okasako-Schmucker
- Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Yinan Peng
- Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Jamaicia Cobb
- Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Ka Zang Xiong
- Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shawna L Mercer
- Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy (OADPS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Susan A Sabatino
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia
| | - Stephanie Melillo
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia
| | - Patrick L Remington
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Shiriki K Kumanyika
- Department of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Beth Glenn
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Erica S Breslau
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Karen Glanz
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Patricia D Mullen
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Sally W Vernon
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Abstract
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States and globally with the majority of lung cancer cases attributable to cigarette smoking. Given the high societal and personal cost of a diagnosis of lung cancer including that most cases of lung cancer when diagnosed are found at a late stage, work over the past 40 years has aimed to detect lung cancer earlier when curative treatment is possible. Screening trials using chest radiography and sputum failed to show a reduction in lung cancer mortality however multiple studies using low dose CT have shown the ability to detect lung cancer early and a survival benefit to those screened. This review will discuss the history of lung cancer screening, current recommendations and screening guidelines, and implementation and components of a lung cancer screening program.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Popalis ML, Ramirez SI, Leach KM, Granzow ME, Stoltzfus KC, Moss JL. Improving cervical cancer screening rates: a scoping review of resources and interventions. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:1325-1333. [PMID: 35980511 PMCID: PMC10124066 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01618-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cervical cancer mortality can be prevented through early detection with screening methods such as Pap and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) tests; however, only 81% of women aged 21-65 are up-to-date on screening. Many interventions to increase cervical cancer screening have been implemented, but there is limited understanding about which intervention components are most successful. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of existing literature and available resources for cervical cancer screening interventions to identify gaps in the research. We used t tests and correlations to identify associations among intervention components and effect sizes. RESULTS Out of nine studies, the mean overall effect size for interventions was 11.3% increase in Pap testing for cervical cancer screening (range = - 4-24%). Interventions that included community health workers or one-on-one interaction had the biggest effect size (p < 0.05). No associations with effect size were noted for literacy level, number of intervention components, or targeting by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Future interventions may include educational sessions with community health workers or one-on-one patient interaction to improve cervical cancer screening. Further research is needed to establish effect sizes for large-scale interventions and hrHPV screening interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madyson L Popalis
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Sarah I Ramirez
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Kelsey M Leach
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Marni E Granzow
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Kelsey C Stoltzfus
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Moss
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Tian L, Huang L, Liu J, Li X, Ajmal A, Ajmal M, Yao Y, Tian L. Impact of Patient Navigation on Population-Based Breast Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:2811-2820. [PMID: 35650466 PMCID: PMC9411406 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07641-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unsatisfactory cancer screening results are often associated with poor prognosis. This study synthesized the literatures addressing the impact of patient navigation (PN) interventions on population-based breast cancer screening promotion to identify characteristics of the model for addressing breast cancer disparities. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Registry from inception to 31 December 2020 for randomized controlled trials (PROSPERO: CRD42021246890). We double blindly abstracted data and assessed study quality. We assessed screening completion rates and diagnostic resolution using random-effects models between those receiving navigation and controls. RESULTS Of 236 abstracts identified, 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Nine of the papers evaluated the impact of PN on breast screening, while the other six were on the resolution of abnormal screening results. Compared to the non-PN group, PN improved screening completion (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.4-2.8]) and shortened the time to diagnosis (WMD: - 9.90 days, 95% CI: - 19.09 to - 0.71). CONCLUSIONS Patient navigation improves breast cancer screening rates but does not improve resolution of abnormal tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Tian
- The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300170, China
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China
- The 3rd Department of Breast Cancer, China Tianjin Breast Cancer Prevention, Treatment and Research Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Lei Huang
- Department of Heart Center, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300170, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300170, China
| | - Xia Li
- The 3rd Department of Breast Cancer, China Tianjin Breast Cancer Prevention, Treatment and Research Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Aisha Ajmal
- St George's Hospital Medical School, St George's, University of London, London, SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Maryam Ajmal
- GKT School of Medical Education, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
| | - Yunjin Yao
- Department of Thyroid Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Li Tian
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin, China.
- Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin, China.
- Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.
- The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin, 300170, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Valverde PA, Kennedy Sheldon L, Gentry S, Dwyer AJ, Saavedra Ferrer EL, Wightman PD. Flexibility, adaptation, and roles of patient navigators in oncology during COVID-19. Cancer 2022; 128 Suppl 13:2610-2622. [PMID: 35699607 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of COVID-19 on cancer care during the first 6 months of the pandemic has been significant. The National Navigation Roundtable Workforce Development Task Group conducted a national survey to highlight the role of patient navigators (PNs). METHODS An anonymous online survey captured how cancer care navigation changed during 2 phases: 1) March 13 to May 31, 2020; and 2) June 1 to September 4, 2020. Differences between the 2 time periods for categorical variables were assessed using χ2 tests, and 1-way analyses of variance were used for ordinal variables. RESULTS Almost one-half of PNs expected changes in duties (49%) during phase 1. By phase 2, PNs showed greater confidence in retaining PN work (P < .001) and reduced changes to duties (P < .01). PNs reported new training on COVID-19 and telehealth during phase 1 (64% and 27%, respectively) and phase 2 (54% and 19%, respectively). Significant decreases in service delays were identified by phase 2 for cancer screening (P < .001), preventive care (P < .001), medical treatment (P < .01), cancer treatment (P < .001), and cancer survivorship services (P < .01). PNs reported that the top patient issues were COVID-19 concerns, medical care disruptions, and finances, and there were decreases in medical care disruptions (P < .01) during phase 2. PNs addressed myths related to mask use, COVID-19 spread, disbelief, risk, clinical changes, transmission prevention, and finances/politics. CONCLUSIONS The PN role demonstrated resiliency and adaptability. Both clinical and nonclinical oncology PNs identified key patient needs and can provide connections with patient populations that have been economically and socially marginalized, which is necessary to build trust throughout the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A Valverde
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Lisa Kennedy Sheldon
- Clinical and Scientific Affairs, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sharon Gentry
- Academy of Oncology Nurse and Patient Navigators, Cranbury, New Jersey
| | - Andrea J Dwyer
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Elba L Saavedra Ferrer
- Center for Collaborative Research and Community Engagement, College of Education and Human Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Patrick D Wightman
- Arizona Health Sciences-Center for Population Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Sister, Give Me Your Hand: a Qualitative Focus Group Study on Beliefs and Barriers to Mammography Screening in Black Women During the COVID-19 Era. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2022; 10:1466-1477. [PMID: 35731462 PMCID: PMC9215139 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01332-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Aims/Purpose To evaluate current day challenges and beliefs about breast cancer screening for Black women in two diverse northeast communities in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Background Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women in the USA. Although Black women are less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer, they suffer a higher mortality. Early detection of breast cancer can be accomplished through routine screening mammography, yet the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mammography screening barriers and perception in minority communities is uncertain. Methods Five focus group interviews were conducted as the first phase of a mixed method study across two heterogeneously diverse locations, Camden, New Jersey, and Brooklyn, New York. Results Thirty-three women participated in this study; sixteen women were recruited at the New Jersey location and seventeen at the New York location. Only two thirds of the women stated that they had received a mammogram within the last 2 years. The major themes were binary: I get screened or I do not get screened. Subthemes were categorized as patient related or system related. Conclusions Our findings on factors that affect breast cancer screening decisions during the COVID-19 era include barriers that are related to poverty and insurance status, as well as those that are related to medical mistrust and negative healthcare experiences. Community outreach efforts should concentrate on building trust, providing equitable digital access, and skillfully addressing breast health perceptions.
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Tay E, Vlaev I, Massaro S. The Behavioral Factors That Influence Person-Centered Social Care: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:4334. [PMID: 35410016 PMCID: PMC8998779 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The last decade has seen numerous policy reforms to emplace person-centered social care. Consequently, the public has been given more information, choice, and autonomy to decide how best they want to be cared for later in life. Despite this, adults generally fail to plan or prepare effectively for their future care needs. Understanding the behavioral antecedents of person-centered decision-making is thus critical for addressing key gaps in the provision of quality social care. To this end, we conducted a literature review of the psychological and health sciences with the aim of identifying the aspects that influence person-centered decision-making in social care. Using an established theoretical framework, we distilled nine behavioral factors-knowledge, competency, health, goal clarity, time discounting, familiarity, cognitive biases, cognitive overload, and emotion-associated with "Capability," "Opportunity," "Motivation," and "Behavior" that explained person-centered decision-making in social care. These factors exist to different degrees and change as a person ages, gradually impacting their ability to obtain the care they want. We discuss the role of carers and the promise of shared decision-making and conclude by advocating a shift from personal autonomy to one that is shared with carers in the delivery of quality social care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Tay
- NUS Care Unit, Office of the Senior Deputy President and Provost, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore
| | - Ivo Vlaev
- Department of Behavioural Science, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK;
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Crabtree-Ide C, Sevdalis N, Bellohusen P, Constine LS, Fleming F, Holub D, Rizvi I, Rodriguez J, Shayne M, Termer N, Tomaszewski K, Noyes K. Strategies for Improving Access to Cancer Services in Rural Communities: A Pre-implementation Study. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:818519. [PMID: 36925773 PMCID: PMC10012790 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.818519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Implementation science is defined as the scientific study of methods and strategies that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice into regular use by practitioners. Failure of implementation is more common in resource-limited settings and may contribute to health disparities between rural and urban communities. In this pre-implementation study, we aimed to (1) evaluate barriers and facilitators for implementation of guideline-concordant healthcare services for cancer patients in rural communities in Upstate New York and (2) identify key strategies for successful implementation of cancer services and supportive programs in resource-poor settings. Methods The mixed methods study was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Using engagement approaches from Community-Based Participatory Research, we collected qualitative and quantitative data to assess barriers and facilitators to implementation of rural cancer survivorship services (three focus groups, n = 43, survey n = 120). Information was collected using both in-person and web-based approaches and assessed attitude and preferences for various models of cancer care organization and delivery in rural communities. Stakeholders included cancer survivors, their families and caregivers, local public services administrators, health providers, and allied health-care professionals from rural and remote communities in Upstate New York. Data was analyzed using grounded theory. Results Responders reported preferences for cross-region team-based cancer care delivery and emphasized the importance of connecting local providers with cancer care networks and multidisciplinary teams at large urban cancer centers. The main reported barriers to rural cancer program implementation included regional variation in infrastructure and services delivery practices, inadequate number of providers/specialists, lack of integration among oncology, primary care and supportive services within the regions, and misalignment between clinical guideline recommendations and current reimbursement policies. Conclusions Our findings revealed a unique combination of community, socio-economic, financial, and workforce barriers to implementation of guideline-concordant healthcare services for cancer patients in rural communities. One strategy to overcome these barriers is to improve provider cross-region collaboration and care coordination by means of teamwork and facilitation. Augmenting implementation framework with provider team-building strategies across and within regions could improve rural provider confidence and performance, minimize chances of implementation failure, and improve continuity of care for cancer patients living in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Crabtree-Ide
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Nick Sevdalis
- Center for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Bellohusen
- Judy DiMarzo Cancer Survivorship Program, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Louis S. Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Fergal Fleming
- Surgical Health Outcomes & Research Enterprise (SHORE), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - David Holub
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Irfan Rizvi
- Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, McLean, VA, United States
| | - Jennifer Rodriguez
- Livingston County Public Health Department, Mt. Morris, NY, United States
| | - Michelle Shayne
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Nancy Termer
- Flatiron Healthcare Inc., New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Katia Noyes
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Szeszulski J, Craig DW, Walker TJ, Foster M, Mullen PD, Fernandez ME. Applying evidence-based intervention (EBI) mapping to identify the components and logic of colorectal cancer screening interventions. Transl Behav Med 2022; 12:304-323. [PMID: 34730181 PMCID: PMC8848996 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) can help to increase colorectal cancer screening (CRCS). Potential users of CRCS EBIs are often unclear about the specific features, logic, and core elements of existing EBIs, making it challenging to use or adapt them. We used EBI Mapping, a systematic process developed from Intervention Mapping that identifies an EBI's components and logic, to characterize existing CRCS EBIs from the National Cancer Institute's Evidence-Based Cancer Control Programs website. The resulting information can facilitate intervention adoption, adaptation, and/or implementation. Two trained coders independently coded intervention materials to describe intervention components and logic (n = 20). We display CRCS EBI components (potential mechanism of change) using evidence tables and heat maps. All EBIs addressed completion of at least one CRCS behavior (stool-based test, n = 9; stool-based test or another CRCS test, n = 8; colonoscopy, n = 3; colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, n = 1). The psychosocial determinants most frequently addressed by these interventions were knowledge (n = 19), attitudes (n = 17), risk perception/perceived susceptibility (n = 16), skills (n = 15), and overcoming barriers (n = 15). Multi-level EBIs (n = 9) attempted to change an average of 2.1 ± 1.1 conditions in the patients' environment (e.g., accessibility of CRCS); only four EBIs used environmental change agents (e.g., providers, nurses). From the heat maps of EBIs, we describe common theoretical change methods' (e.g., facilitation) used for addressing determinants (e.g., overcoming barriers). EBI Mapping can help users identify important components of a CRCS EBI's logic; these proposed mechanisms of action can inform adoption, adaptation, and implementation in new settings, and facilitate scale up of EBIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Szeszulski
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Austin, TX 78701, USA
| | - Derek W Craig
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Timothy J Walker
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maya Foster
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patricia Dolan Mullen
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Baggett TP, Barbosa Teixeira J, Rodriguez EC, Anandakugan N, Sporn N, Chang Y, Percac-Lima S, Park ER, Rigotti NA. Patient navigation to promote lung cancer screening in a community health center for people experiencing homelessness: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 113:106666. [PMID: 34971796 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is a major cause of death among people experiencing homelessness, with mortality rates more than double those in the general population. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) could reduce lung cancer deaths in this population, although the circumstances of homelessness present multiple barriers to LCS LDCT completion. Patient navigation is a promising strategy for overcoming these barriers. METHODS The Investigating Navigation to Help Advance Lung Equity (INHALE) Study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient navigation for LCS among individuals receiving primary care at Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (BHCHP). Three hundred BHCHP patients who meet Medicare/Medicaid criteria for LCS will be randomized 2:1 to usual care with (n = 200) or without (n = 100) LCS navigation. Following a structured, theory-based protocol, the patient navigator assists with each step in the LCS process, providing lung cancer education, facilitating shared decision-making visits with primary care providers (PCPs), assisting in making and attending LCS LDCT appointments, arranging follow-up when needed, and offering tobacco cessation support for smokers. The primary outcome is receipt of LCS LDCT at 6 months. Using a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach, qualitative interviews with participants and PCPs will aid in interpreting and contextualizing the trial results. DISCUSSION This trial will produce the first experimental evidence on patient navigation for cancer screening in a homeless health care setting. Results could inform cancer health equity efforts at the 299 Health Care for the Homeless programs that serve over 900,000 patients annually in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis P Baggett
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Institute for Research, Quality & Policy in Homeless Health Care, Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Joana Barbosa Teixeira
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elijah C Rodriguez
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nillani Anandakugan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Nora Sporn
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elyse R Park
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Menon U, Lance P, Szalacha LA, Candito D, Bobyock EP, Yellowhair M, Hatcher J. Adaptation of colorectal cancer screening tailored navigation content for American Indian communities and early results using the intervention. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:6. [PMID: 35090575 PMCID: PMC8795961 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00253-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND American Indians (AI) experience major colorectal cancer (CRC) screening disparities with commensurate inequity in CRC mortality and other outcomes. The purpose of this report is to describe the methods and early results of adapting a previously successful intervention for the AI community. METHODS The educational content and delivery strategy of the parent intervention were adapted for AIs guided by an adaptation framework and cultural consultations with the community and clinicians. As part of the environmental scanning, we identified the need to substantively revise our data entry, collection, and tracking system and develop a REDCap database for this purpose. In this study, we staggered the implementation of the intervention in each facility to inform the process from one clinic to the next, and assess both the clinical outcomes of the tailored intervention and the implementation processes across two clinic settings, Facilities A and B. RESULTS The REDCap database is an indispensable asset, and without it we would not have been able to obtain reliable aggregate screening data while improvements to facility electronic health records are in progress. Approximately 8% (n = 678) of screening-eligible patients have been exposed to the navigator intervention. Of those exposed to the navigator intervention, 37% completed screening. CONCLUSIONS With the small numbers of patients exposed so far to the intervention, it would be premature to draw any broad conclusions yet about intervention effects. However, early screening completion rates are substantial advances on existing rates, and we have demonstrated that a tailored navigator intervention for facilitating CRC screening was readily adapted with provider and community input for application to AIs. A REDCap database for tracking of CRC screening by navigators using tablets or laptops on- or offline is easy to use and allows for generation of aggregate, anonymized screening data. TRIAL REGISTRATION There was no health intervention meeting the criteria of a clinical trial. The University of Arizona Institutional Review Board granted exemption from obtaining informed consent from patients undergoing CRC screening after administration of the tailored navigation intervention as usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usha Menon
- College of Nursing, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC Box 22, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Peter Lance
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Laura A Szalacha
- College of Nursing, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC Box 22, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Dianna Candito
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Emily P Bobyock
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Monica Yellowhair
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Jennifer Hatcher
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Mboineki JF, Wang P, Dhakal K, Getu MA, Chen C. The Effect of Peer-Led Navigation Approach as a Form of Task Shifting in Promoting Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge, Intention, and Practices Among Urban Women in Tanzania: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221089480. [PMID: 35666651 PMCID: PMC9174555 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221089480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even though the government's priorities in preventing cervical cancer are implemented in urban areas, the screening rate remains unsatisfactory at 6%, compared to 70% recommended by the world health organization. The ongoing public health education has not resulted in sufficient screening rates. The study aims to assess peer-led navigation (PLNav) in promoting cervical cancer screening knowledge, intention, and practices among urban women in Tanzania. Since PLNav is the form of task shifting, it involves delegating cervical-cancer-related tasks from healthcare professionals to community health workers (CHWs). METHODS It is a community-based randomized controlled trial conducted in Dar es Salaam in Tanzania March-Sept 2020. The PLNav involved the CHWs delivering health education, counselling and navigation assistance to community women (COMW). The CHWs help women who have never undergone cervical cancer screening (CCS) and those who have undergone CCS but with a precancerous cervical lesion to overcome screening barriers. The data related to PLNav were analyzed by descriptive statistics, an independent-samples t-test, repeated measures ANOVA and linear regression. RESULTS The repeated measures ANOVA across time showed that PLNav intervention on mean knowledge score changes was statistically significant in the intervention group compared with the control group's usual care, [F (1, 43) = 56.9, P < .001]. At the six-month follow-up, 32 (72.7%) out of 44 participants from the intervention group had screened for cervical cancer, and only one participant (2.3%) from the control group screened. The PLNav intervention on CCS uptake changes was statistically significant in the intervention group compared with usual care in the control group [F (1, 43) = 100.4, P < .001]. The effect of time on CCS uptake in the intervention and control groups was statistically significant [F (1.64, 70.62) = 73.4, P < .001]. CONCLUSION Peer-led navigation (PLNav) was effective in promoting cervical cancer screening knowledge, intention, and uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanes Faustine Mboineki
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou
University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan,
China
- School of Nursing and Public Health, The
University of Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Panpan Wang
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan,
China
| | - Kamala Dhakal
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan,
China
| | - Mikiyas Amare Getu
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan,
China
| | - Changying Chen
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou
University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Li HW, Scanlon ML, Kisilu N, Litzelman DK. The role of community health workers in the surgical cascade: a scoping review. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2021; 19:122. [PMID: 34602064 PMCID: PMC8489043 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00659-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community health workers (CHWs) can increase access to various primary healthcare services; however, their potential for improving surgical care is under-explored. We sought to assess the role of CHWs in the surgical cascade, defined as disease screening, linkage to operative care, and post-operative care. Given the well-described literature on CHWs and screening, we focused on the latter two steps of the surgical cascade. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature. We searched for studies published in any language from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2020 using electronic literature databases including Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. We included articles on CHW involvement in linkage to operative care and/or post-operative surgical care. Narrative and descriptive methods were used to analyze the data. RESULTS The initial search identified 145 articles relevant to steps in the surgical cascade. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for review. In linkage to care, CHWs helped increase surgical enrollment, provide resources for vulnerable patients, and build trust in healthcare services. Post-operatively, CHWs acted as effective monitors for surgical-site infections and provided socially isolated patients with support and linkage to additional services. The complex and wide-ranging needs of surgical patients illustrated the need to view surgical care as a continuum rather than a singular operative event. CONCLUSION While the current literature is limited, CHWs were able to maneuver complex medical, cultural, and social barriers to surgical care by linking patients to counseling, education, and community resources, as well as post-operative infection prevention services. Future studies would benefit from more rigorous study designs and larger sample sizes to further elucidate the role CHWs can serve in the surgical cascade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen W. Li
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St. Louis, MO United States of America
| | - Michael L. Scanlon
- Indiana University Center for Global Health, 702 Rotary Circle, Suite RO 101, Indianapolis, IN 46202 United States of America
| | - Nicholas Kisilu
- Department of General Surgery and Anesthesiology, Moi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Debra K. Litzelman
- William M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc. and Indiana University School of Medicine, 1101 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202 United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Mistry SK, Harris E, Harris M. Community Health Workers as Healthcare Navigators in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:2755-2771. [PMID: 33674916 PMCID: PMC8390732 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06667-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review was carried out to synthesize the evidence of the effectiveness of community health worker (CHW) navigation in primary care chronic disease management. METHODS We searched the English language literature between January 1990 and March 2020 in Medline, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Psych Info, CINAHL, Scopus, and Medline Epub ahead of print. Data extraction, quality rating, and assessment of the reporting of interventions were performed by two reviewers independently and the findings were synthesized narratively. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. All but two were carried out in the USA and half were randomized controlled trials. Six of the 29 studies were of strong methodological quality while 12 were moderate and 11 weak. Overall, CHW navigation interventions were effective in increasing adherence to cancer screening and improving use of primary care for chronic disease management. There was insufficient evidence that they improved clinical outcomes or risk factors and reduced use of secondary or tertiary care or that they were cost-effective. However, criteria for recruitment, duration, and mode of training and supervision arrangements varied greatly between studies. DISCUSSION CHW navigation interventions improved aspects of chronic disease management. However, there is insufficient evidence of the impact on patient experience, clinical outcomes, or cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Future research should focus on standardizing organizational components of the CHW navigation interventions and evaluating their cost-effectiveness. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION The review protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42020153921).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabuj Kanti Mistry
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Vadaparampil ST, Moreno Botero L, Fuzzell L, Garcia J, Jandorf L, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Campos-Galvan C, Peshkin BN, Schwartz MD, Lopez K, Ricker C, Fiallos K, Quinn GP, Graves KD. Development and pilot testing of a training for bilingual community education professionals about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among Latinas: ÁRBOLES Familiares. Transl Behav Med 2021; 12:6320107. [PMID: 34255089 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer health disparities remain a significant problem in the USA, compounded by lack of access to care, language barriers and systemic biases in health care. These disparities are particularly evident in areas such as genetics/genomics. For example, Latinas at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have extremely low rates of genetic counseling/testing. Long-standing barriers and inequities in access to services such as genetic counseling and testing require innovative solutions. One solution can involve training community outreach and education professionals (CORE-Ps) to bridge the gap between underserved communities and genetic specialists. We sought to develop and pilot test a training program for English-Spanish bilingual CORE-Ps to reduce disparities in access to and uptake of genetic services among Latino populations. Guided by Adult Learning Theory and with input from multiple stakeholders, we developed ÁRBOLES Familiares (Family Trees), an in-person and online training program for bilingual CORE-Ps to facilitate identification, referral, and navigation of Latinas to genetic counseling/testing. We conducted a pilot test of 24 CORE-Ps recruited from across the United States and assessed knowledge, genetic literacy, and self-efficacy at baseline and follow-up. At follow-up, participants in the pilot with complete baseline and follow-up data (N = 15) demonstrated significant improvements in HBOC knowledge, genetic literacy, self-efficacy and reports of fewer barriers to identify/navigate Latinas (ps < .05). Qualitative assessment identified ways to improve the training curriculum. Pilot results suggest ÁRBOLES is a promising approach for training CORE-Ps to identify and refer high-risk Latinas to genetic services. Next steps involve further refinement of ÁRBOLES, development of an online toolkit, and adaptation for virtual delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan T Vadaparampil
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Office of Community Outreach, Engagement, and Equity, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lina Jandorf
- Icahn School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Beth N Peshkin
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Katherine Lopez
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Charité Ricker
- University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katie Fiallos
- Johns Hopkins University Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Kristi D Graves
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Leach KM, Granzow ME, Popalis ML, Stoltzfus KC, Moss JL. Promoting colorectal cancer screening: A scoping review of screening interventions and resources. Prev Med 2021; 147:106517. [PMID: 33711351 PMCID: PMC8096709 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection through screening can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality, but approximately 33% of adults aged 50-75 are not getting screened as recommended. Many interventions to increase CRC screening have been tested, but clinical and community organizations may be challenged in identifying the optimum programs and program materials to increase screening and ultimately reduce CRC mortality. METHODS We conducted a scoping review to characterize existing, US-based interventions to improve CRC screening and to identify gaps in the literature. We used t-tests and correlations to analyze the relationship between project features and intervention effect sizes. RESULTS The overall effect sizes were + 16% for changes in screening by any modality. The average effect sizes were greater for projects with more components, used patient navigation, and provided free/low-cost testing. CONCLUSION Interventions varied greatly in terms of follow-up time, test modality, and data sources. Organizations seeking to implement a program aimed at increasing CRC screening should consider both intervention components and relevant program materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey M Leach
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Marni E Granzow
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Madyson L Popalis
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Kelsey C Stoltzfus
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer L Moss
- Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Lee RJ, Madan RA, Kim J, Posadas EM, Yu EY. Disparities in Cancer Care and the Asian American Population. Oncologist 2021; 26:453-460. [PMID: 33683795 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Asian Americans are the only racial/ethnic group in the U.S. for whom cancer is the leading cause of death in men and women, unlike heart disease for all other groups. Asian Americans face a confluence of cancer risks, with high rates of cancers endemic to their countries of origin due to infectious and cultural reasons, as well as increasing rates of "Western" cancers that are due in part to assimilation to the American diet and lifestyle. Despite the clear mortality risk, Asian Americans are screened for cancers at lower rates than the majority of Americans. Solutions to eliminate the disparity in cancer care are complicated by language and cultural concerns of this very heterogeneous group. This review addresses the disparities in cancer screening, the historical causes, the potential contribution of racism, the importance of cultural perceptions of health care, and potential strategies to address a very complicated problem. Noting that the health care disparities faced by Asian Americans may be less conspicuous than the structural racism that has inflicted significant damage to the health of Black Americans over more than four centuries, this review is meant to raise awareness and to compel the medical establishment to recognize the urgent need to eliminate health disparities for all. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cancer is the leading cause of death in Asian Americans, who face cancers endemic to their native countries, perhaps because of infectious and cultural factors, as well as those faced by all Americans, perhaps because of "Westernization" in terms of diet and lifestyle. Despite the mortality rates, Asian Americans have less cancer screening than other Americans. This review highlights the need to educate Asian Americans to improve cancer literacy and health care providers to understand the important cancer risks of the fastest-growing racial/ethnic group in the U.S. Eliminating disparities is critical to achieving an equitable society for all Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Lee
- Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ravi A Madan
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jayoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA.,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Edwin M Posadas
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Cha EY, Chun H. Barriers and Challenges to Cervical Cancer Screening, Follow-Up, and Prevention Measures among Korean Immigrant Women in Hawaii. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2021; 8:132-138. [PMID: 33688561 PMCID: PMC7934592 DOI: 10.4103/2347-5625.308302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite being the fastest-growing population in the United States, Asian American women have one of the lowest cancer screening rates and the least attention given to cancer-related research. Cervical cancer screening disparities among Korean immigrant women (KIWs) in Hawaii have been reported. METHODS The qualitative ethnographic study was to explore the health barriers and challenges of cervical cancer prevention among KIWs in Hawaii. The Social Ecological Model was used to guide the study. Data were collected using individual structured interviews with 20 KIWs aged 21-65 years. The data were coded and analyzed to identify themes in exploring health barriers. RESULTS The findings revealed that participants (a) lacked knowledge about the U.S. health-care system; (b) lacked access; (c) had limited resources regarding cervical cancer screening communicated in Korean; (d) lacked an understanding of cultural and psychosocial beliefs on preventive care; (e) lacked female and Korean-speaking providers; and (f) experienced language barriers and limited coverage of health insurance. CONCLUSIONS A multicomponent intervention combining individual and community-based, Internet-accessible, culturally, and linguistically appropriate approaches may enhance effective cervical cancer screening rates and positive health outcomes among KIWs in Hawaii.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eurina Yujin Cha
- School of Nursing and Health Professions, Chaminade University, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Hans Chun
- School of Education and Behavioral Sciences, Chaminade University, Honolulu, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Mboineki JF, Wang P, Chen C. Fundamental Elements in Training Patient Navigators and Their Involvement in Promoting Public Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge and Practices: A Systematic Review. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211026670. [PMID: 34169777 PMCID: PMC8236772 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211026670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer screening remains unsatisfactory in some regions due to hindrances. This study aims to explore fundamental elements in training patient navigators and their involvement in promoting screening knowledge and practices. METHODS This systematic review study included only English published articles between 2014 and 2019 from PubMed/Medline, EBSCO, Science Direct, and Wiley online library. RESULTS Healthcare professionals trained patient navigators in 3 days regarding screening basics, along with group discussions and role-plays. They delivered effective health education and navigation assistance. CONCLUSION The group education session facilitated by patient navigators, coupled with navigation care, resulted in a high screening rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanes Faustine Mboineki
- First Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
- School of Nursing, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- College of Health Sciences, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Panpan Wang
- School of Nursing, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Changying Chen
- First Affiliated Teaching Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Nelson HD, Cantor A, Wagner J, Jungbauer R, Fu R, Kondo K, Stillman L, Quiñones A. Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Increase Cancer Screening in Populations Adversely Affected by Health Disparities: a Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:3026-3035. [PMID: 32700218 PMCID: PMC7573022 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06020-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the effectiveness of patient navigation to increase screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in populations adversely affected by health care disparities. METHODS Eligible studies were identified through English-language searches of Ovid® MEDLINE®, PsycINFO®, SocINDEX, and Veterans Affairs Health Services database (January 1, 1996, to July 5, 2019) and manual review of reference lists. Randomized trials and observational studies of relevant populations that evaluated the effectiveness of patient navigation on screening rates for colorectal, breast, or cervical cancer compared with usual or alternative care comparison groups were included. Two investigators independently abstracted study data and assessed study quality and applicability using criteria adapted from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Results were combined using profile likelihood random effects models. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria (28 colorectal, 11 breast, 4 cervical cancers including 3 trials with multiple cancer types). Screening rates were higher with patient navigation for colorectal cancer overall (risk ratio [RR] 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42 to 1.92; I2 = 93.7%; 22 trials) and by type of test (fecal occult blood or immunohistochemistry testing [RR 1.69; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.15; I2 = 80.5%; 6 trials]; colonoscopy/endoscopy [RR 2.08; 95% CI 1.08 to 4.56; I2 = 94.6%; 6 trials]). Screening was also higher with navigation for breast cancer (RR 1.50; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.91; I2 = 98.6%; 10 trials) and cervical cancer (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19; based on the largest trial). The high heterogeneity of cervical cancer studies prohibited meta-analysis. Results were similar for colorectal and breast cancer regardless of prior adherence to screening guidelines, follow-up time, and study quality. CONCLUSIONS In populations adversely affected by disparities, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening rates were higher in patients provided navigation services. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42018109263.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Nelson
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Amy Cantor
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jesse Wagner
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Rebecca Jungbauer
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Rongwei Fu
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Karli Kondo
- Evidence-based Synthesis Program, Portland VA Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.,Office of Research Integrity, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Lucy Stillman
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ana Quiñones
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Dickerson JC, Ragavan MV, Parikh DA, Patel MI. Healthcare delivery interventions to reduce cancer disparities worldwide. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:705-722. [PMID: 33033693 PMCID: PMC7522545 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i9.705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Globally, cancer care delivery is marked by inequalities, where some economic, demographic, and sociocultural groups have worse outcomes than others. In this review, we sought to identify patient-facing interventions designed to reduce disparities in cancer care in both high- and low-income countries. We found two broad categories of interventions that have been studied in the current literature: Patient navigation and telehealth. Navigation has the strongest evidence base for reducing disparities, primarily in cancer screening. Improved outcomes with navigation interventions have been seen in both high- and low-income countries. Telehealth interventions remain an active area of exploration, primarily in high income countries, with the best evidence being for the remote delivery of palliative care. Ongoing research is needed to identify the most efficacious, cost-effective, and scalable interventions to reduce barriers to the receipt of cancer care globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Dickerson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Meera V Ragavan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Divya A Parikh
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Manali I Patel
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
- Center for Health Policy/Primary Care Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94306, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Peer Support as an Ideal Solution for Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:850-858. [PMID: 32167969 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low implementation of colorectal cancer screening in ethnic minorities is the main reason for racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. Peer support is widely used for promoting health care in ethnic minorities. However, whether it improves their acceptance to undergo the screening remains controversial. OBJECTIVE We performed a meta-analysis of the currently available studies to further explore its effectiveness. DATA SOURCES This meta-analysis was undertaken using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO for randomized controlled trials. STUDY SELECTION We included studies that compared peer support interventions among ethnic minorities versus other interventions to promote uptake of colorectal cancer screening. RESULTS Thirteen studies comprising 8090 participants met the eligibility criteria. Peer support intervention can increase colorectal cancer screening implementation and raise awareness and intention to undergo the screening in ethnic minorities more significantly than fecal occult blood test outreach, print, and usual care. Subgroup analysis showed that peer support intervention achieved great results in Asian Americans and intervention of peer counseling. LIMITATIONS The results of subgroup analysis had substantial heterogeneity, which may decrease the precision of our estimates. CONCLUSIONS Peer support can significantly improve the awareness about and the intention for receiving colorectal cancer screening in ethnic minorities and is an ideal choice for promoting the screening among ethnic minorities, particularly in a diverse community. Peer support intervention is recommended to promote the implementation of screening in Asian Americans. Peer counseling is worth promoting; however, church-based peer counseling programs require enhanced management to maintain their fidelity.
Collapse
|
|
37
|
D'Onise K, Iacobini ET, Canuto KJ. Colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests for Indigenous adults: A systematic literature review of barriers, enablers and implemented strategies. Prev Med 2020; 134:106018. [PMID: 32057956 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using a Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) is a well-established population intervention to reduce mortality and morbidity of CRC. As Indigenous people are not fully benefiting from the screening programs, a greater understanding of barriers and enablers affecting participation is needed. METHODS Searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, Sociological Abstracts, Scopus, CINAHL, and selected websites. Both qualitative and quantitative studies related to Indigenous populations of Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the United States of America were assessed for quality and data related to FOBT were extracted and synthetised. RESULTS A total of 375 publications were identified and screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirty-four studies were included in the review. The barriers for participation in CRC screening included the lack of culturally competent health service access, particularly access to Indigenous health service providers. Medical discrimination, long-standing distrust in Western medicine and/or health staff and screening tests were all identified as barriers for Indigenous people. There were a small number of promising interventions to improve participation, which could be considered on a broader scale to increase overall participation by Indigenous people in CRC screening. CONCLUSIONS The review identified barriers and possible enablers for Indigenous participation in the CRC screening program, some which appear to be unique to Indigenous people. Further intervention studies conducted in partnership with Indigenous communities are needed to improve participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katina D'Onise
- Prevention and Population Health Directorate, Wellbeing SA, Citi Centre Building, 11 Hindmarsh Square, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Katina.D'
| | | | - Karla Joy Canuto
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Feinglass J, Cooper JM, Rydland K, Tom LS, Simon MA. Using Public Claims Data for Neighborhood Level Epidemiologie Surveillance of Breast Cancer Screening: Findings from Evaluating a Patient Navigation Program in Chicago's Chinatown. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2019; 13:95-102. [PMID: 31378739 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to evaluate a patient navigation program undertaken with our community partners in Chicago's Chinatown. Inadvertently, the study collected data on two biannual mammography screening cycles that coincided almost exactly with implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in Illinois. METHODS The study uses claims data to profile mammography screening rates for residents of an 18 zip code, 398 census tract area on Chicago's near south and southwest side. Patient addresses were geocoded from biannual (August 2011 to July 2103 and August 2103 to July 2015) Illinois Medicaid and Illinois Breast and Cervical Cancer Program (IBCCP) claims. Screening rates are presented separately for low-income women ages 40 to 49 and 50 to 64 years. We compare change between 16 tracts with greater than 20% Chinese ancestry, 85 tracts with 1% to 20% Chinese ancestry, and 297 tracts with less than 1% Chinese ancestry. RESULTS There were more than 65,000 low-income women age 40 to 64 in the study area (mammogram patients were 63% Black, 23% Hispanic, 10% White, 2.5% Asian, and 2.5% other/unknown race and ethnicity). The increase in screening was greatest in Chinatown, although mean rates were not significantly different across the three areas (p = .07). DISCUSSION Our results demonstrate large increases in mammography screening after ACA implementation in 20132014. The greatest increase occurred in the Chinatown patient navigation program area. The study provides a template for programs aimed at using public community-area data to evaluate programs for improving access to care and health equity.
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Stupplebeen DA, Barnett-Sherrill AT, Sentell TL. Community Health Workers in Hawai'i: A Scoping Review and Framework Analysis of Existing Evidence. HAWAI'I JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH : A JOURNAL OF ASIA PACIFIC MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 78:6-14. [PMID: 31285962 PMCID: PMC6603885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Community health workers (CHWs) play a vital role in health across Hawai'i, but the scope of this work is not comprehensively collated. This scoping review describes the existing evidence of the roles and responsibilities of CHWs in Hawai'i. Methods: Between May and October 2018, researchers gathered documents (eg, reports, journal articles) relevant to Hawai'i CHWs from health organizations, government entities, colleges/universities, and CHWs. Documents were reviewed for overall focus and content, then analyzed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 10 Essential Public Health Services as well as the Community Health Worker Core Consensus Project roles to identify workplace roles and gaps. Results: Of 92 documents received, 68 were included for review. The oldest document dated to 1995. Document types included curricula outlines, unpublished reports, and peer-reviewed articles. Documents discussed trainings, certification programs, CHWs' roles in interventions, and community-, clinical-, and/or patient-level outcomes. Cultural concordance parity between CHWs and patients, cost savings, and barriers to CHW work were noted. Most roles named by the Community Health Worker Core Consensus Project were mentioned in documents, but few were related to the roles of "community/policy advocacy" and "participation in research and evaluation." Workplace roles, as determined using the 10 Essential Public Health Services, focused more on "assuring workforce competency" and "evaluation," and less on "policy development," and "enforcing laws." Discussion: CHWs are an important part of Hawaii's health system and engage in many public health functions. Although CHW roles in Hawai'i mirrored those identified by the CHW Core Consensus Project and 10 Essential Public Health Services frameworks, there is a noticeable gap in Hawai'i CHW professional participation in research, evaluation, and community advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Stupplebeen
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (DAS, TLS)
| | - Alexis T Barnett-Sherrill
- Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion Division, Hawai'i State Department of Health, Kapolei, HI (ATB-S)
| | - Tetine L Sentell
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (DAS, TLS)
| |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Stupplebeen DA, Sentell TL, Pirkle CM, Juan B, Barnett-Sherrill AT, Humphry JW, Yoshimura SR, Kiernan J, Hartz CP, Keliikoa LB. Community Health Workers in Action: Community-Clinical Linkages for Diabetes Prevention and Hypertension Management at 3 Community Health Centers. HAWAI'I JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH : A JOURNAL OF ASIA PACIFIC MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 78:15-22. [PMID: 31285963 PMCID: PMC6603891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In 2014, the Hawai'i State Department of Health (HDOH) received funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), via the 1422 Cooperative Agreement, to conduct diabetes prevention and hypertension management. To implement one grant-required strategy-the engagement of community health workers (CHWs) to promote community-clinical linkages-the HDOH partnered with the Hawai'i Primary Care Association and 9 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). This qualitative evaluation case study sought to understand how 3 of the funded FQHCs engaged CHWs, the types of community-clinical linkages the CHWs promoted, and the facilitators of and barriers to those linkages. Evaluators conducted 2 semi-structured group interviews with 6 administrators/clinicians and 7 CHWs in April 2018. The transcribed interviews were deductively and inductively analyzed to identify major themes. First, CHWs made multiple internal and external linkages using resources provided by the grant as well as other resources. Second, CHWs faced barriers in making community-clinical linkages due to individual patient, geographic, and economic constraints. Third, CHWs have unmet professional needs related to building community-clinical linkages including professional development, networking, and burnout. Reimbursement and payment mechanisms are an all-encompassing challenge to the sustainability of CHW positions, as disease-specific funding and a complete lack of reimbursement structures make CHW positions unstable. Thus, CHWs fulfill a number of grant-specific roles at FQHCs due to this patchwork of funding sources, and this relates to CHWs' experiences of burnout. Policy implications of this study include funding and reimbursement stabilization so FQHCs may consistently engage and support the CHW workforce to meet their patients' complex, diverse needs. More professional development opportunities for CHWs are necessary to build sustainable networks of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Stupplebeen
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (DAS, TLS, CMP, LBK)
| | - Tetine L Sentell
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (DAS, TLS, CMP, LBK)
| | - Catherine M Pirkle
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (DAS, TLS, CMP, LBK)
| | - Bryan Juan
- Hawai'i Primary Care Association, Honolulu, HI (BJ)
| | - Alexis T Barnett-Sherrill
- Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion Division, Hawai'i State Department of Health, Kapolei, HI (ATB-S)
| | | | | | - Jasmin Kiernan
- West Hawai'i Community Health Center, Kailua-Kona, HI (JK, CPH)
| | - Claudia P Hartz
- West Hawai'i Community Health Center, Kailua-Kona, HI (JK, CPH)
| | - L Brooke Keliikoa
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI (DAS, TLS, CMP, LBK)
| |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Rodriguez-Torres SA, McCarthy AM, He W, Ashburner JM, Percac-Lima S. Long-Term Impact of a Culturally Tailored Patient Navigation Program on Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Refugee Women After the Program's End. Health Equity 2019; 3:205-210. [PMID: 31106287 PMCID: PMC6524343 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2018.0104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the long-term effects of a patient navigation (PN) program for mammography screening tailored to refugee women and to assess screening utilization among these women after PN ended. Methods: We assessed the proportion of patients completing mammography screening during the prior 2 years during 2012–2016 for refugee women who had previously received PN compared with that of English-speaking women cared for at the same health center during the same period, both overall and stratifying by age. We used logistic regression to compare screening completion between refugees and English speakers, adjusting for age, race, insurance status, number of clinic visits, and clustering by primary care physician and to test trends in screening over time. Results: In 2012, the year when the funding for PN ceased, among 126 refugee women eligible for breast cancer screening, mammography screening rates were significantly higher among refugees (90.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.5–94.7%) than among English speakers (81.9%, 95% CI: 76.2–86.5%, p=0.006). By 2016, screening rates decreased among refugee women (76.5%, 95% CI: 61.6–86.9%, p=0.023) but were not statistically significantly different from those among English-speaking women (80.5%, 95% CI: 74.4–85.3%, p=0.460). Screening prevalence for refugee women remained above the pre-PN program screening levels, and considerably so in women <50 years. Conclusion: The culturally and language-tailored PN program for refugee women appeared to have persistent effects, with refugee women maintaining similar levels of mammography screening to English-speaking patients 5 years after the PN program's end.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Marie McCarthy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wei He
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey M Ashburner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Bernardo BM, Zhang X, Beverly Hery CM, Meadows RJ, Paskett ED. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review. Cancer 2019; 125:2747-2761. [PMID: 31034604 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Published studies regarding patient navigation (PN) and cancer were reviewed to assess quality, determine gaps, and identify avenues for future research. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies investigating the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of PN across the cancer continuum. Each included article was scored independently by 2 separate reviewers with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. The current review identified 113 published articles that assessed PN and cancer care, between August 1, 2010, and February 1, 2018, 14 of which reported on the cost-effectiveness of PN programs. Most publications focused on the effectiveness of PN in screening (50%) and diagnosis (27%) along the continuum of cancer care. Many described the effectiveness of PN for breast cancer (52%) or colorectal cancer outcomes (51%). Most studies reported favorable outcomes for PN programs, including increased uptake of and adherence to cancer screenings, timely diagnostic resolution and follow-up, higher completion rates for cancer therapy, and higher rates of attending medical appointments. Cost-effectiveness studies showed that PN programs yielded financial benefits. Quality assessment showed that 75 of the 113 included articles (65%) had 2 or more weak components. In conclusion, this review indicates numerous gaps within the PN and cancer literature where improvement is needed. For example, more research is needed at other points along the continuum of cancer care outside of screening and diagnosis. In addition, future research into the effectiveness of PN for understudied cancers outside of breast and colorectal cancer is necessary along with an assessment of cost-effectiveness and more rigorous reporting of study designs and results in published articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany M Bernardo
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Xiaochen Zhang
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Chloe M Beverly Hery
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rachel J Meadows
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Electra D Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Thomas L, Parker S, Song H, Gunatillaka N, Russell G, Harris M. Health service brokerage to improve primary care access for populations experiencing vulnerability or disadvantage: a systematic review and realist synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:269. [PMID: 31035997 PMCID: PMC6489346 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4088-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals experiencing disadvantage or marginalisation often face difficulty accessing primary health care. Overcoming access barriers is important for improving the health of these populations. Brokers can empower and enable people to access resources; however, their role in increasing access to health services has not been well-defined or researched in the literature. This review aims to identify whether a health service broker working with health and social service providers in the community can (a) identify individuals experiencing vulnerability who may benefit from improved access to quality primary care, and (b) link these individuals with an appropriate primary care provider for enduring, appropriate primary care. METHODS Six databases were searched for studies published between January 2008 and August 2015 that evaluated a health service broker intervention linking adults experiencing vulnerability to primary care. Relevant websites were also searched. Included studies were analysed using candidacy theory and a realist matrix was developed to identify mechanisms that may have contributed to changes in response to the interventions in different contexts. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the review. Of the eight studies judged to provide detailed description of the programs, the interventions predominately addressed two domains of candidacy (identification of candidacy and navigation), with limited applicability to the third and fourth dimensions (permeability of services and appearances at health services). Six of the eight studies were judged to have successfully linked their target group to primary care. The majority of the interventions focused on assisting patients to reach services and did not look at ways that providers or health services could alter the way they deliver care to improve access. CONCLUSIONS While specific mechanisms behind the interventions could not be identified, it is suggested that individual advocacy may be a key element in the success of these types of interventions. The interventions were found to address some dimensions of candidacy, with health service brokers able to help people to identify their need for care and to access, navigate and interact with services. More consideration should be given to the influence of providers on patient candidacy, rather than placing the onus on patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Thomas
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Sharon Parker
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Hyun Song
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Nilakshi Gunatillaka
- The Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria 3168 Australia
| | - Grant Russell
- The Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria 3168 Australia
| | - Mark Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Domingo JLB, Chen JJ, Braun KL. Colorectal Cancer Screening Compliance among Asian and Pacific Islander Americans. J Immigr Minor Health 2019; 20:584-593. [PMID: 28378254 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-017-0576-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening prevalence remains low among Asians and Pacific Islanders. This study examined disparities and predictors of CRC screening compliance in adults age 50-75 years in Asians and Pacific Islanders in Hawai'i. Hawai'i Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data for 2011-2014 were analyzed. CRC screening status was dichotomized. Logistic regression was used to examine ethnic differences in and predictors of CRC screening status. Filipinos (OR 0.56), Chinese (OR 0.70), and Hawaiians (OR 0.75) were significantly less likely than whites to be CRC compliant. Higher education and income, employment, regular health provider, and routine checkups were important predictors of CRC compliance. Findings confirm lower CRC screening compliance in three of the four largest Asian and Pacific Islander groups in Hawai'i and that CRC screening compliance is influenced by several factors. Culturally tailored education and navigation services may be effective in reducing these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jermy-Leigh B Domingo
- University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Office of Public Health Studies, 1960 East-West Road, Biomed, D-204, 96822, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA.
| | - John J Chen
- University of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Office of Biostatistics & Quantitative Health Sciences, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA
| | - Kathryn L Braun
- University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Office of Public Health Studies, 1960 East-West Road, Biomed, D-204, 96822, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Facilitators and barriers to optimal preventive service use among providers and older patients. Geriatr Nurs 2019; 40:72-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
|
46
|
Shusted CS, Barta JA, Lake M, Brawer R, Ruane B, Giamboy TE, Sundaram B, Evans NR, Myers RE, Kane GC. The Case for Patient Navigation in Lung Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review. Popul Health Manag 2018; 22:347-361. [PMID: 30407102 PMCID: PMC6685525 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2018.0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient navigation has been proposed to combat cancer disparities in vulnerable populations. Vulnerable populations often have poorer cancer outcomes and lower levels of screening, adherence, and treatment. Navigation has been studied in various cancers, but few studies have assessed navigation in lung cancer. Additionally, there is a lack of consistency in metrics to assess the quality of navigation programs. The authors conducted a systematic review of published cancer screening studies to identify quality metrics used in navigation programs, as well as to recommend standardized metrics to define excellence in lung cancer navigation. The authors included 26 studies evaluating navigation metrics in breast, cervical, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer. After reviewing the literature, the authors propose the following navigation metrics for lung cancer screening programs: (1) screening rate, (2) compliance with follow-up, (3) time to treatment initiation, (4) patient satisfaction, (5) quality of life, (6) biopsy complications, and (7) cultural competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine S Shusted
- 1Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julie A Barta
- 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Lake
- 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rickie Brawer
- 3Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Center for Urban Health, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Brooke Ruane
- 4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Teresa E Giamboy
- 5Tobacco Dependence Program, Jefferson Health - Northeast, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Baskaran Sundaram
- 6Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathaniel R Evans
- 7Division of Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronald E Myers
- 8Division of Population Science and Center for Health Decisions, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gregory C Kane
- 9Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Neal CD, Weaver DT, Raphel TJ, Lietz AP, Flores EJ, Percac-Lima S, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Patient Navigation to Improve Cancer Screening in Underserved Populations: Reported Experiences, Opportunities, and Challenges. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:1565-1572. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
|
48
|
Temkin SM, Rimel BJ, Bruegl AS, Gunderson CC, Beavis AL, Doll KM. A contemporary framework of health equity applied to gynecologic cancer care: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:70-77. [PMID: 29605053 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Health disparities are defined as the preventable difference in the burden of disease, injury, and violence, or opportunity to achieve optimal health that socially disadvantaged populations experience compared to the population as a whole. Disparities in incidence and cancer outcomes for women with gynecologic malignancies have been well described particularly for American women of Black race. The etiology of these disparities has been tied to socio-economics, cultural, educational and genetic factors. While access to high quality treatment has been primarily linked to survival from cervical and ovarian cancer, innate biologic distinctions have been principally cited as reasons for differences in incidence and mortality in cancers of the uterine corpus. This article will update the framework of disparities to incorporate a broader understanding of the social determinants of health and how they affect health equity by addressing the root causes of disparities within the health care system. Special populations are identified who are at risk for health inequities which include but are not limited to Black race, underserved racial and ethnic minorities (e.g. indigenous peoples, low English fluency), trans/gender nonconforming people and rural populations. Each of these populations at risk have unique structural barriers within the healthcare system impacting gynecologic cancer outcomes. The authors provide practical recommendations for practitioners aimed at eliminating cancer related outcome disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Temkin
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Camille C Gunderson
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma city, OK, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
49
|
Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, Flowers CR, Guerra CE, LaMonte SJ, Etzioni R, McKenna MT, Oeffinger KC, Shih YCT, Walter LC, Andrews KS, Brawley OW, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Siegel RL, Wender RC, Smith RA. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:250-281. [PMID: 29846947 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1288] [Impact Index Per Article: 184.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer diagnosed among adults and the second leading cause of death from cancer. For this guideline update, the American Cancer Society (ACS) used an existing systematic evidence review of the CRC screening literature and microsimulation modeling analyses, including a new evaluation of the age to begin screening by race and sex and additional modeling that incorporates changes in US CRC incidence. Screening with any one of multiple options is associated with a significant reduction in CRC incidence through the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps and other precancerous lesions and with a reduction in mortality through incidence reduction and early detection of CRC. Results from modeling analyses identified efficient and model-recommendable strategies that started screening at age 45 years. The ACS Guideline Development Group applied the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria in developing and rating the recommendations. The ACS recommends that adults aged 45 years and older with an average risk of CRC undergo regular screening with either a high-sensitivity stool-based test or a structural (visual) examination, depending on patient preference and test availability. As a part of the screening process, all positive results on noncolonoscopy screening tests should be followed up with timely colonoscopy. The recommendation to begin screening at age 45 years is a qualified recommendation. The recommendation for regular screening in adults aged 50 years and older is a strong recommendation. The ACS recommends (qualified recommendations) that: 1) average-risk adults in good health with a life expectancy of more than 10 years continue CRC screening through the age of 75 years; 2) clinicians individualize CRC screening decisions for individuals aged 76 through 85 years based on patient preferences, life expectancy, health status, and prior screening history; and 3) clinicians discourage individuals older than 85 years from continuing CRC screening. The options for CRC screening are: fecal immunochemical test annually; high-sensitivity, guaiac-based fecal occult blood test annually; multitarget stool DNA test every 3 years; colonoscopy every 10 years; computed tomography colonography every 5 years; and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:250-281. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M D Wolf
- Associate Professor and Attending Physician, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Elizabeth T H Fontham
- Emeritus Professor, Louisiana State University School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA
| | - Timothy R Church
- Professor, University of Minnesota and Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Professor and Attending Physician, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | - Carmen E Guerra
- Associate Professor of Medicine of the Perelman School of Medicine and Attending Physician, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Samuel J LaMonte
- Independent retired physician and patient advocate, University of Washington and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Ruth Etzioni
- Biostatistician, University of Washington and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Matthew T McKenna
- Professor and Director, Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Professor and Director of the Duke Center for Onco-Primary Care, Durham, NC
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Professor, Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Louise C Walter
- Professor and Attending Physician, University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kimberly S Andrews
- Director, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Otis W Brawley
- Chief Medical and Scientific Officer and Executive Vice President-Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Durado Brooks
- Vice President, Cancer Control Interventions, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Strategic Director for Risk Factor Screening and Surveillance, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Strategic Director, Surveillance Information Services, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Richard C Wender
- Chief Cancer Control Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Robert A Smith
- Vice President, Cancer Screening, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Sunny A, Rustveld L. The Role of Patient Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Education: a Review of the Literature. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:251-259. [PMID: 27878766 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1140-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Although the general assumption is that patient navigation helps patients adhere to CRC screening recommendations, concrete evidence for its effectiveness is still currently under investigation. The present literature review was conducted to explore effectiveness of patient navigation and education on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion in medically underserved populations. Data collection included PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane reviews searches. Study inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials and prospective investigations that included an intervention and control group. Case series, brief communications, commentaries, case reports, and uncontrolled studies were excluded. Twenty-seven of the 36 studies screened for relevance were selected for inclusion. Most studies explored the utility of lay and clinic-based patient navigation. Others implemented interventions that included tailored messaging, and culturally and linguistically appropriate outreach and education efforts to meet CRC screening needs of medically underserved individuals. More recent studies have begun to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses of patient navigation programs that impacted CRC screening and completion. Peer-reviewed publications consistently indicate a positive impact of patient navigation programs on CRC screening completion, as well have provided preliminary evidence for their cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajeesh Sunny
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luis Rustveld
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|