Currently, treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are limited after receiving multiple lines of therapy. Furmonertinib, a newly developed third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has shown potential as a subsequent treatment. To explore efficacy and safety of furmonertinib, the present retrospective study analyzed patients with EGFR-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) who received furmonertinib after the failure of multiple lines of therapy at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital (Beijing, China) between December 2021 and April 2024. Data on patient demographics, treatment efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed until disease progression. A total of 25 patients with advanced LUAD were retrospectively included in the analysis. Among them, 15 (60.0%) harbored exon 19del, whilst 10 (40.0%) had exon21 L858R mutations. Pre-treatment genetic testing was performed in 14 patients (56.0%). Prior to furmonertinib therapy, 17, 5 and 19 patients had previously received first-, second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, respectively. The median line of treatment before furmonertinib was 3. The median progression-free survival was 5.73 (95% confidence interval, 4.30-not reached) months. The objective response rate was 16.0% (n=4) and the disease control rate was 88.0% (n=22). A total of 18 (72.0%) patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE). The rate of AEs was 80.0% (n=20) for grade 1-2, and 20.0% (n=5) for grade 3-4 AEs. No AEs led to treatment discontinuation, dose reductions or death. In conclusion, furmonertinib is a viable treatment option for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced LUAD after the failure of multiple lines of therapy, even after resistance to treatment with third-generation EGFR-TKIs targeted agents. However, further large-scale clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Activating mutations in the catalytic kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are crucial drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our understanding of the structural changes induced by such mutations has evolved alongside the rational design of targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), leading to improved anti-tumor responses through appropriate patient stratification. However, challenges remain, including a growing number of therapy adaptation mechanisms and acquired resistance, which are further complicated by the intricate signaling networks of EGFR. Here, we review the rational development and targeting of EGFR-TKIs in the context of TKI-induced cellular death, adaptation, resistance, and eventual clinical failure, to provide a birds-eye view of this highly multidisciplinary field. We end by proposing new approaches based on our developing understanding of the quaternary structure of EGFR, which leverage in situ oligomer architectures to develop therapies that modulate EGFR oligomer-specific interactions and exploit weaknesses in its downstream signaling network to overcome resistance.

Over the past two decades, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has witnessed encouraging advancements in basic and clinical research. However, substantial unmet needs remain for patients worldwide, as drug resistance persists as an inevitable reality. Meanwhile, the journey towards amplifying the breadth and depth of the therapeutic effect requires comprehending and integrating diverse and profound progress. In this review, therefore, we aim to comprehensively present such progress that spans the various aspects of molecular pathology, encompassing elucidations of metastatic mechanisms, identification of therapeutic targets, and dissection of spatial omics. Additionally, we also highlight the numerous small molecule and antibody drugs, encompassing their application alone or in combination, across later-line, frontline, neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. Then, we elaborate on drug resistance mechanisms, mainly involving targeted therapies and immunotherapies, revealed by our proposed theoretical models to clarify interactions between cancer cells and a variety of non-malignant cells, as well as almost all the biological regulatory pathways. Finally, we outline mechanistic perspectives to pursue innovative treatments of NSCLC, through leveraging artificial intelligence to incorporate the latest insights into the design of finely-tuned, biomarker-driven combination strategies. This review not only provides an overview of the various strategies of how to reshape available armamentarium, but also illustrates an example of clinical translation of how to develop novel targeted drugs, to revolutionize therapeutic landscape for NSCLC.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation is one of the major mechanisms of resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Chemotherapy is typically the recommended treatment for transformed SCLC (T-SCLC), similar to primary SCLC. However, the benefits of chemotherapy alone are minimal. Prior research highlights differences between the biological traits of T-SCLC and primary SCLC or EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study aims to elucidate the molecular characteristics of T-SCLC and identify potential treatment modalities.

We retrospectively collected tissue samples from LUAD, T-SCLC post-EGFR-TKI resistance, and primary SCLC. Genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics were performed to clarify the differences between T-SCLC, LUAD, and primary SCLC. Hierarchical clustering analysis was then used to categorize the molecular subtype of T-SCLC, followed by a survival analysis based on these subtypes.

A study involving 61 patients investigated differences between LUAD, SCLC, and primary SCLC. RNA sequencing revealed distinct gene expression variations, particularly up-regulation in PPM1E, INSM1, and KCNC1 genes in T-SCLC. Pathway analysis linked T-SCLC to the cell cycle and neural differentiation. By conducting Hierarchical clustering analysis on RNA-seq data, the entire population can be categorized into two distinct groups. While certain T-SCLC showed similarities and differences compared to SCLC, with subtypes: LUAD-like and Non-LUAD-like. Notably, the LUAD-like subtype had significantly higher NKX2-1 expression (mean 371.8 vs. 41.8, P < 0.0001). T-SCLC treatment approaches were categorized into matched and unmatched groups, delineated by the alignment of specific therapies with corresponding pathologies. The matched group (13 cases) exhibited a significantly prolonged median progression-free survival compared to the unmatched group (10 cases) (5.4 months vs. 3.6 months, P = 0.02).

T-SCLC exhibits marked molecular distinctiveness, setting it apart not only from LUAD but also from classical SCLC. This distinction extends to its classification into two discernible molecular subtypes: LUAD-like and Non-LUAD-like. Customizing therapeutic protocols to align with these specific subtypes have the potential to identify the most appropriate treatment for T-SCLC.

We aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) in combination with third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) administration for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Individuals with advanced NSCLC and EGFR mutations who underwent third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment and MWA (EGFR-TKI treatment followed by MWA [Group E + M] and MWA followed by EGFR-TKI treatment [Group M + E]) were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was duration of response (DoR).

There were 12 patients in Group E + M and 16 in Group M + E. The overall median DoR was 21.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.3-26.4). The median DoR was 25.7 months (95% CI: 20.6-30.9) and 20.5 months (95% CI: 5.9-35.1) in Group E + M and Group M + E (P = 0.996), respectively. When EGFR-TKIs were used as a first-line treatment, the median DoR overall and that of patients in Groups E + M and M + E were 29.3 months (95% CI: 19.2-39.4), 29.3 months (95% CI: 21.0-37.5), and not reached (P = 0.252), respectively. Major complications related to pneumothorax were observed in five patients, with no difference observed between the groups.

Patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who underwent third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment plus MWA had a superior DoR and experienced minimal complications.

Due to the potential occurrence of drug interactions, the combined application of firmonertinib and paxlovid carries a relatively high risk. Nevertheless, as of now, there has been no comprehensive research on the interaction between firmonertinib and paxlovid. Our aim was to establish and validate an accurate, stable, rapid and simple UPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of firmonertinib and its metabolite AST-5902 in rat plasma, which was applied to the study of the in vivo interaction between firmonertinib and paxlovid. Gefitinib was selected as the internal standard. After protein precipitation of the plasma samples with acetonitrile, the separation was carried out on a Shimadzu LC-20AT UHPLC. The chromatographic column was a Shim-pack Volex PFPP column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm), and the mobile phase was composed of 0.1% formic acid - water and 0.1% formic acid - methanol. Mass spectrometry detection was performed using a Shimadzu 8,040 mass spectrometer in ESI+ and MRM mode. The precision, accuracy, recovery and matrix effect of this method were detected. The linearity of the method and the stability of the samples were assessed. Subsequently, the method was applied to the study of the interaction between firmonertinib and paxlovid. The parent ions and typical fragment ions of firmonertinib, AST-5902 and IS are respectively m/z 569.25 → 72.15, m/z 555.50 → 498.10 and m/z 447.25→ 128.20. The selectivity, specificity, linearity, recovery, matrix effect, accuracy and precision of the method and the stability of the samples were all adequately verified. The results of drug interaction showed that when firmonertinib was combined with paxlovid, the AUC and Cmax of firmonertinib were significantly increased, while the AUC, Tmax, and Cmax of AST-5902 were significantly decreased. The established UHPLC-MS/MS detection method is accurate, stable, rapid and simple. Paxlovid exhibit a significant inhibitory effect on the metabolism of firmonertinib in rats.

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Recent advances in precision oncology have enabled many specific cancer patient populations to respond well and achieve longer survival with small-molecule kinase inhibitors, which have become a new therapeutic strategy for tumors. Since 2001, the Food and Drug Administration has approved 108 and 63 new anticancer drugs for treating solid tumors and hematological malignancies, respectively, 89 of which belong to the large group of small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs). Compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-FU, SMKIs offer better efficacy with fewer toxic side effects. Nevertheless, with the development of more novel SMKIs and their wider clinical application to a larger population of cancer patients, variable degrees of cardiotoxic adverse events have emerged for some SMKIs during cancer therapy. This review comprehensively summarizes the most updated progress in the cardiotoxicity of SMKIs in cancer therapy and discusses the new findings and mechanisms, which will provide emerging strategies for the prevention of cardiotoxicity caused by small molecule targeted drugs and the design of the next generation of low cardiotoxicity targeted drugs.

The data for dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis was lacking. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis in first-line settings.

Eligible patients were treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with ≥1 brain metastasis no less than 5 mm treated with dacomitinib. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial and extracranial ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The response was evaluated per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and RANO-BM (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases) criteria.

Between July 2nd, 2019, and September 30th, 2022, a total of 87 treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis treated with dacomitinib from four hospitals were included. The data cutoff date was March 24th, 2023, and the median duration of follow-up time was 17.5 months (range 1.6-34.7 months). Based on mRECIST criteria, for all the 87 patients with evaluable brain metastasis, the iORR was 89.7% (95%CI, 81.3%-95.2%) and iDCR was 97.7% (95%CI, 91.9-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 36 patients achieving PR, and 7 patients maintaining SD. Based on RANO-BM criteria, the iORR was 71.3% (62/87, 95%CI 60.6%-80.5%) and iDCR was 97.7% (85/87, 95%CI, 91.9%-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 20 patients achieving PR, and 23 patients maintaining SD (Table). Median iPFS was 26.0 (95%CI, 20.7-31.4) months, and the 1-year and 2-year iPFS rate were 68.9% and 51.5%, respectively. Of 75 patients with evaluable extracranial lesions, 2 patients achieved CR (2.7%), the systemic ORR was 73.8% (95%CI 63.1%-82.8%) and DCR was 96.4% (89.9%-99.3%) (Table). Systemic median PFS was 14.0 (95%CI 11.1-16.9) months and median OS was 34.0 (95%CI 28.0-39.9) months. Overall, 86 of 87 (98.9%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade. The most common (≥20%) AEs including rash (89.7%), oral ulcer (74.2%), diarrhea (67.8%), and paronychia (59.8%). Most of the AEs were grade 1 or grade 2 and no patients died due to severe AEs.

Dacomitinib showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile for advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation in the first-line treatment.

Common EGFR mutations including exon-19 deletions and the L858R point mutation in exon 21 constitute predominant actionable genomic alterations in individuals with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has fundamentally changed the treatment landscape for such patients by improving both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Among EGFR-TKIs, third-generation agents such as osimertinib have shown marked efficacy and favorable safety profiles and have become the standard of care in the first-line setting. The combination of osimertinib with platinum-based chemotherapy has recently been shown to improve PFS compared with osimertinib monotherapy in the FLAURA2 trial. Similarly, the MARIPOSA trial demonstrated clinical benefit of the combination of the EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, amivantamab, with the third-generation EGFR-TKI, lazertinib, further supporting the use of combination therapies as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Despite these advances, however, challenges such as brain metastases remain substantial barriers to successful treatment outcomes. Management of patients with such metastases often requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates systemic treatment with local interventions such as radiation therapy. Finally, circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a promising biomarker for real-time monitoring of treatment response and evolution of drug resistance mechanisms. Analysis of such biomarkers can facilitate dynamic and personalized therapeutic adjustments, potentially improving outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest clinical evidence supporting therapeutic advances in the management of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, emphasizing the importance of tailoring treatment strategies based on tumor biology, patient-specific factors, and evolving therapeutic options.

A clinically important subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is driven by common mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Over the past decade, first-, second-, and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have substantially improved clinical outcomes, although acquired resistance inevitably emerges. In particular, the third-generation TKI osimertinib has demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to earlier-generation TKIs in the frontline setting, yet median OS remains approximately three years in pivotal trials. Efforts to extend disease control have led to various upfront intensification strategies, including combining EGFR TKIs with antiangiogenics or chemotherapy (e.g., the FLAURA-2 trial), and pairing novel bispecific antibodies such as amivantamab with third-generation TKIs. Upon progression on third-generation EGFR TKIs, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard second-line treatment, albeit with modest response rates. Emerging therapies targeting MET amplification (e.g., savolitinib plus osimertinib), leveraging antibody-drug conjugates (e.g., patritumab deruxtecan), or adding immunotherapy and antiangiogenics have shown preliminary promise in overcoming resistance. Ongoing trials are assessing optimal treatment sequencing and the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to guide therapy escalation or de-escalation. Ultimately, the evolving landscape of EGFR-mutant NSCLC underscores the need for refined biomarker-driven approaches and personalized regimens to achieve further gains in survival. In this review, we discuss these strategies in detail, highlighting current evidence and future directions for EGFR-mutant NSCLC treatment.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have shown significant efficacy in patients with brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, acquired resistance is inevitable, and clinical data addressing key questions across treatment stages remain insufficient, limiting the formulation of precise treatment strategies.

This retrospective study analyzed 302 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with BMs treated at Shandong Cancer Hospital (2014-2022). Patients were divided into three cohorts: cohort A (first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs without third-generation use), cohort B (first-/second-generation followed by third-generation EGFR-TKIs), and cohort C (first-line third-generation EGFR-TKIs). Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses across three treatment stages. Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for baseline imbalances.

Third-generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line therapy compared to earlier-generation agents (median PFS1: 14.2 vs. 11.2 months; p = 0.0021), particularly for intracranial control (median iPFS1: 18.0 vs. 12.2 months; p = 0.0058). Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations had significantly shorter PFS on third-generation EGFR-TKIs than those with common mutations (4.4 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.012). After resistance, combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenics, and chemotherapy extended overall survival (OS) versus non-ICI regimens (median OS2: 17.3 vs. 10.4 months; p = 0.004).

Third-generation EGFR-TKIs are effective first-line options for BMs but show limited efficacy against uncommon mutations. Post-resistance regimens integrating ICIs, antiangiogenics, and chemotherapy may improve survival. Reassessment of genetic and PD-L1 status is critical for guiding sequential therapy.

The seminal identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations as pivotal oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has catalyzed the evolution of biomarker-guided therapeutic paradigms for advanced disease. Currently, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) have revolutionized first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, yet acquired resistance remains an inevitable and formidable clinical challenge. This review systematically summarizes molecular mechanisms underlying treatment resistance, with a focus on clinical challenges associated with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Therapeutic resistance mechanisms are categorized into EGFR-dependent (on-target) pathways, typified by acquired kinase domain mutations (e.g., C797S), and EGFR-independent (off-target) pathways, involving compensatory activation of parallel signaling effectors (e.g., MET amplification, HER2 activation) or phenotypic transformation. We further evaluated contemporary diagnostic modalities for identifying resistance drivers and appraised emerging therapeutic strategies, including fourth-generation EGFR-TKI, various combination therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and so forth, with emphasis on ongoing clinical trials that may transform the existing treatment paradigm. By synthesizing preclinical and clinical insights, this review aims to advance mechanistic understanding and propose therapeutic strategies to overcome acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKI in first-line treatment.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are described in 10-15% of Caucasian patients and in 50% of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the therapeutic scenario and has changed the natural history of the disease. Despite the results obtained with osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, most patients experience disease progression. The search for new therapeutic strategies both to enhance first-line treatment and to ensure adequate second-line therapies represents an unmet medical need, towards which all efforts are being concentrated. In this review, we describe the main strategies identified to improve the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present a challenging prognosis, with systemic therapies often limited by the blood-brain barrier. However, intrathecal pemetrexed injections can increase intracranial drug concentrations, aiding in disease control.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining intrathecal pemetrexed with systemic therapy in patients with NSCLC and LM.

Thirty-one patients with NSCLC and LM who received intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy between 2018 and 2022 at First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College were retrospectively reviewed.

Of the 31 patients enrolled, six had LM at initial diagnosis. The median number of intrathecal pemetrexed injections was 4 (2-26), with an intracranial control rate of 87.1% (27/31). Median iPFS was 9 months (95% CI: 2.77-15.23), and median iOS was 12 months (95% CI: 5.94-18.06 months). Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2, with four (12.9%) grade 3 AEs (including two cases of grade 3 leukopenia; one, grade 3 diarrhea; one, grade 3 interstitial pneumonitis). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the combination of bevacizumab (p<0.05) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) score of ≤ 1 (p<0.05) were favorable prognostic factors for survival.

Intrathecal pemetrexed injections combined with systemic treatment demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy and manageable safety in NSCLC patients with LM.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) and gefitinib as first-line therapies in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study (REZOR) included eligible patients from 50 hospitals across China. Those who had been histologically or cytologically confirmed as having NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation by central laboratory were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once daily either rezivertinib 180 mg or gefitinib 250 mg, until unacceptable toxicity occurred, disease progression, or other treatment discontinuation criteria were met. Each cycle lasted for 21 days. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival evaluated by masked independent central review (MICR) in the intention-to-treat set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03866499 and follow-up is ongoing.

Between July 15, 2019, and Feb 14, 2022, 695 patients were screened. Among them, 369 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either rezivertinib 180 mg/day plus placebo (n=184) or gefitinib 250 mg/day plus placebo (n=185) in a 1:1 ratio; all of eligible participants were included in the intention-to-treat set. Median MICR-assessed progression-free survival was 19·3 months (95% CI 13·8-22·1) in the rezivertinib group and 9·6 months (8·4-11·3) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·36-0·63; p<0·0001) and the prespecified subgroup efficacy analysis showed consistent results. Median duration of exposure was 16·0 months (95% CI 0·0-29·7) in the rezivertinib group and 11·0 months (0·0-28·9) in the gefitinib group. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (82 [45%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 80 [43%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 43 [23%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 43 [23%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) were similar in both groups. One patient died from a TRAE in the rezivertinib group, due to pneumonia and interstitial lung disease.

Our findings suggested that rezivertinib is a potential choice for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC as first-line therapy, owing to the superior overall efficacy and subgroup progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in targeted patients. No new safety signals were identified.

Beta Pharma (Shanghai) and the China National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development.

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to identify the most effective first-line intervention (FLI) for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in patients with varying brain metastasis (BM) status.

Data were collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), either alone or in combination, for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC (EMAN) patients. The sources included EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and relevant conference abstracts from inception until December 2023.

A total of 37 RCTs, encompassing 24 intervention options, were included in the NMA. Osimertinib combined with chemotherapy (CT) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to aumolertinib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.93), furmonertinib (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), lazertinib (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98), osimertinib alone (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80), osimertinib + bevacizumab (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.00), befotertinib (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.90), and zorifertinib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93). Further, amivantamab + lazertinib showed slightly better PFS compared to aumolertinib, furmonertinib, zorifertinib, and osimertinib + bevacizumab (HR <1, but P >0.05). Regarding overall survival (OS), amivantamab + lazertinib demonstrated superior results relative to furmonertinib (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95) and befotertinib (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77). No significant OS differences were observed among osimertinib, osimertinib + bevacizumab, osimertinib + CT, lazertinib, and amivantamab + lazertinib. In BM patients, osimertinib + CT significantly enhanced PFS compared to osimertinib (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.66), furmonertinib (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.90), befotertinib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-1.00), and zorifertinib (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.89). However, no noticeable PFS differences were observed between osimertinib + CT and amivantamab + lazertinib or aumolertinib. Lastly, osimertinib + CT and zorifertinib were associated with higher rates of all-grade adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs, respectively.

In EMAN patients, osimertinib + CT and amivantamab + lazertinib were associated with optimal PFS and OS, respectively. Among BM patients, osimertinib + CT offered the best PFS benefits. These findings may assist in clinical decision-making and personalized care for EMAN and BM patients. The study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024506995).

Most non-small cell lung cancer patients have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations, such as exon 19 deletion and exon 21 replacement mutations. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for the treatment of lung cancer patients carrying EGFR activating mutations. Osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a rare and potentially fatal pulmonary toxic manifestation of drug therapy. At present, there is no international consensus on the risks and treatment of the osimertinib-induced ILD.

We report a case of a 56-year-old woman who was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with lung hilum, mediastinal lymph nodes and brain metastases (T4N3M1c stage IVB). The patient received targeted treatment with osimertinib after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. But she developed ILD after osimertinib treatment. Following active symptomatic treatment and hormone treatment, the lung injury alleviated. The patient was retreated with furmonertinib combined with prednisone and did not experience ILD again. So far, she has survived for 14 months without disease progression.

Retreatment with furmonertinib under prednisone could be considered as an effective therapeutic option after risk-benefit assessment for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Malignant phyllodes tumours (MPT) of the breast are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms. It exhibits rapid growth, large size, and a high local recurrence rate.

In this study, we established novel patient-derived organoid (PDO) models from two primary MPT samples and conducted comprehensive genetic profiling and drug screening.

The PDO models faithfully recapped the histopathological and molecular features of the primary tumours, including stromal overgrowth, leaf-like projections, and the expression of key diagnostic markers. Drug testing revealed significant heterogeneity in response profiles to chemotherapeutic reagents between the two MPT-derived organoids, implying the importance of personalised drug testing. Next-generation sequencing analysis identified recurrent mutations in TP53, RB1, EGFR, ATM, and RECQL4, which correlated with the drug sensitivity profiles observed in the organoid models. Targeted therapeutic drugs, such as Abemaciclib (targeting the RB1 pathway) with an IC50 value of 1.744 µM, and Alflutinib Mesylate (targeting the EGFR pathway) with an IC50 value of 0.9150 µM, exhibited significant cytotoxic effects in the MPT2 organoid models.

This study highlights the novel application of PDOs for studying the molecular landscape of MPTs and identifying effective therapeutic targets, offering a promising platform for guiding personalised treatment strategies for this rare and challenging cancer.

To date, no direct comparisons have been performed to compare the effectiveness of all epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) against EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing osimertinib, lazertinib, aumolertinib, befotertinib, furmonertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, and chemotherapy. Pooled estimations of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity (grade ≥ 3 adverse events) were performed within the Bayesian framework.

Twenty-three trials involving 11 treatments were included. All EGFR-TKIs improved PFS relative to chemotherapy, except for icotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.44). All EGFR-TKIs demonstrated significant ORR benefits over chemotherapy. Osimertinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with icotinib (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.1-0.86), gefitinib (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74), and erlotinib (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-1.0). In addition, osimertinib showed favorable superiority in improving OS compared with chemotherapy (HR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82), gefitinib (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.83), erlotinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.89), and afatinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). Among these regimens, afatinib showed the highest ORR (cumulative probability: 96.96%). Icotinib was associated with minimal toxicity among the EGFR-TKIs, followed by furmonertinib and osimertinib. Moreover, the toxicity spectra differed among the EGFR-TKIs. Subgroup analyses of patients with two common types of EGFR mutations indicated that furmonertinib possessed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with exon 19 deletion, and lazertinib showed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with Leu858Arg mutation. We also identified differences between EGFR-TKIs in prolonging PFS in patients with brain metastasis.

Osimertinib is the first choice of treatment with considerable efficacy and safety for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The treatments associated with the best PFS in patients with exon 19 deletions and Leu858Arg mutations were furmonertinib and lazertinib, respectively.

The discovery of the association between EGFR mutations and the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, third-generation EGFR TKIs, which are often characterized by potent central nervous system penetrance, are the standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Rational combinations of third-generation EGFR TKIs with anti-angiogenic drugs, chemotherapy, the EGFR-MET bispecific antibody amivantamab or local tumour ablation are being investigated as strategies to delay drug resistance and increase clinical benefit. Furthermore, EGFR TKIs are being evaluated in patients with early stage or locally advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, with the ambitious aim of achieving cancer cure. Despite the inevitable challenge of acquired resistance, emerging treatments such as new TKIs, antibody-drug conjugates, new immunotherapeutic approaches and targeted protein degraders have shown considerable promise in patients with progression of EGFR-mutant NSCLC on or after treatment with EGFR TKIs. In this Review, we describe the current first-line treatment options for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, provide an overview of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs and explore novel promising treatment strategies. We also highlight potential avenues for future research that are aimed at improving the survival outcomes of patients with this disease.

Patients taking oral EGFR inhibitors should be alert to the risk of TEN if they suddenly develop widespread rash.

Targeted therapies have changed the treatment landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer and led to improved patient survival across all stages of lung cancer. Newer advances in common and novel oncogenic drivers continue to occur at vigorous speed, making it challenging to stay up to date with the rapidly evolving field. In this article, we review the emerging perspectives in the treatment of actionable targets in lung cancer. We focus on the development of newer KRAS-directed therapies, particularly on non-G12C mutations, pan-RAS inhibitors, and RAS-GTP inhibitors. We also describe the current standard of care for EGFR- and ALK-altered NSCLC and dive into the novel treatments expected to be in the clinic soon. A similar approach is taken toward MET, HER2, RET, ROS1, and FGFR alterations as emerging targets in non-small-cell lung cancer. Finally, we conclude this review with the current body of evidence for targeting TROP-2 as a novel target, potentially of importance in post-targeted therapy scenarios.

Zorifertinib (AZD3759), an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with high blood-brain barrier penetration capability, demonstrated promising intracranial and systemic antitumor activity in phase 1 and 2 studies in central nervous system (CNS)-metastatic patients.

In this phase 3 EVEREST trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03653546), patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations, advanced treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and non-irradiated symptomatic or asymptomatic CNS metastases were randomized (1:1) to zorifertinib or first-generation EGFR-TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib; control). The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST1.1.

Overall, 439 patients were randomized (zorifertinib n = 220; control n = 219). Most patients had the EGFR L858R mutation (55%) or >3 CNS lesions (54%). Median PFS was significantly longer with zorifertinib versus control (9.6 versus 6.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.719; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.580-0.893; p = 0.0024). Zorifertinib significantly prolonged intracranial PFS versus control (BICR per modified RECIST1.1: HR, 0.467; 95% CI, 0.352-0.619; investigator per RANO-BM: HR, 0.627; 95% CI, 0.466-0.844). Overall survival (OS) was immature; the estimated median OS was 37.3 months with zorifertinib and 31.8 months with control (HR, 0.833; 95% CI, 0.524-1.283) in patients subsequently treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Safety profiles were consistent with previously reported data for zorifertinib.

Zorifertinib significantly improved systemic and intracranial PFS versus first-generation EGFR-TKIs; adverse events were manageable. Sequential use of zorifertinib and third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed the potential to prolong patients' survival. The results favor zorifertinib as a novel, well-validated first-line option for CNS-metastatic patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

This work was funded by Alpha Biopharma (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd., China.

This study, conducted as part of a multicenter phase III clinical trial, aimed to assess the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) in comparing the efficacy of short-course and long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). A total of 244 plasma samples from 79 LARC patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) before surgery were collected at various time points. Targeted deep sequencing using a novel MRD panel was performed. During NAT, ctDNA levels declined significantly. Baseline ctDNA-MRD status did not correlate significantly with treatment response. Notably, compared to long-course radiotherapy, microsatellite instability increased significantly after short-course radiotherapy (shortRT). Additionally, ctDNA negativity or lower levels were significantly associated with pathological complete response (pCR). Clearance of ctDNA and MRD after shortRT correlated significantly with pCR. A predictive model based on ctDNA-MRD, combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), outperformed models using only MRD or only CEA in predicting pCR/non-pCR. These findings provide insights into NAT for LARC and highlight ctDNA-based MRD assessment's potential in tailoring treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches.

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is one of the most severe complications of NSCLC. Furmonertinib is a pan-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a high rate of brain penetration and a wide therapeutic window. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of high-dose furmonertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and LM.

This prospective real-world study included patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and LM treated with a high-dose furmonertinib (240 mg once daily) as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points included time to treatment discontinuation and clinical response rate. Additional efficacy evaluations included changes in brain magnetic resonance imaging by the response assessment in neuro-oncology-LM radiologic criteria. We also introduced next-generation sequencing-based assays to evaluate genomic and epigenomic features of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in patients' cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples and to analyze their associations with patient outcomes.

We enrolled 48 patients, of whom 35 (72.9%) had received third-generation EGFR TKIs. The median overall survival was 8.43 months (95% confidence interval: 5.48-11.39 mo), while the median time to treatment discontinuation was 8.27 months (95% confidence interval: 5.40-11.14 mo), and the clinical response rate was 75%. The LM objective response rate and disease control rate assessed with response assessment in neuro-oncology-LM radiologic criteria were 50.0% and 92.1%, respectively. The adverse event profiles were consistent with previous reports of furmonertinib. Briefly, 22 (45.8%) had adverse events possibly related to furmonertinib and 3 (6.3%) had a grade 3-elevated aminotransaminase or nausea or leucopenia, leading to a dose reduction to 160 mg daily. Furthermore, methylation analysis of cfDNA in CSF revealed that there was a considerable correlation between the changes of aberrant methylated fragments from lung cancer cells and the response of the patients. Meanwhile, the copy number burden scores derived from the low-pass whole genome sequencing assay may offer another objective and effective method for the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment efficacy in LM.

In the real world, the high-dose furmonertinib-based treatment may potentially have clinical efficacy and tolerable safety in patients of EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM, even in patients previously treated with other third-generation EGFR TKIs. Methylation and copy number burden analysis of cfDNA in CSF may be considered objective indicators for the diagnosis of LM and evaluation of treatment response.

There are currently various tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based regimens available, and it can be challenging for clinicians to determine the most effective and safe option due to the lack of direct comparisons between these regimens. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of distinct regimens to determine the optimal regimen for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making.

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and international conference databases were comprehensively searched from their inception to 02 April 2024 for collecting data regarding efficacy and safety from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following literature screening and data extraction, a NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety among 21 regimens with a random-effects consistency model in a Bayesian framework using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation technique within the GEMTC package.

A total of 35 RCTs were included, involving 9718 individuals and 21 regimens. Compared with other interventions, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs, especially osimertinib plus ramucirumab, showed the most favorable PFS prolongation in overall patients. Consistently, subgroup analyses showed that third-generation TKIs-based combination regimens were superior to other regimens in most prespecified subgroups with distinct clinicopathological characteristics. In terms of overall survival, despite the combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs also showing relatively superior outcomes, erlotinib plus chemotherapy and gefitinib plus chemotherapy were ranked more favorably. In terms of safety profile, combination therapies based on third-generation TKIs did not significantly increase the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events compared with other regimens.

Our study concluded that combination regimens based on third-generation TKIs (osimertinib plus ramucirumab, osimertinib plus chemotherapy, osimertinib plus bevacizumab, amivantamab plus lazertinib and aumolertinib plus apatinib) could be the new and clinically preferable first-line, standard of care for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023480596).

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the latest and a vital treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Although EGFR-sensitive mutations are an indication for third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy, 30% of NSCLC patients lack response and all patients inevitably progress. There is a lack of biomarkers to predict the efficacy of EGFR-TKI therapy. In this report, we performed comprehensive plasma metabolomic profiling on 186 baseline and 20 post-treatment samples, analyzing 1,019 metabolites using four ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) methods. The dataset contains detailed clinical and metabolic information for 186 patients. Rigorous quality control measures were implemented. No significant differences in body mass index and biochemical metabolic parameters were observed between responders and non-responders. The datasets were utilized to characterize the responsive metabolic traits of third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy. All datasets are available for download on the OMIX website. We anticipate that these datasets will serve as valuable resources for future studies investigating NSCLC metabolism and for the development of personalized therapeutic strategies.

Lung cancer, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is the most prevalent cancer globally and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, frequently observed in female NSCLC patients, have revolutionized treatment strategies with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These therapies significantly improve survival and are considered the standard of care for patients harboring EGFR mutations. However, most patients eventually develop resistance to EGFR-TKIs, leading to disease progression. Resistance mechanisms are classified as either EGFR-dependent or EGFR-independent, the latter involving bypass pathway activation, including dysregulation of downstream signaling cascades. EGFR-independent resistance often renders all EGFR-TKIs ineffective, necessitating further investigation into resistance mechanisms.

We report the case of a 63-year-old Chinese woman diagnosed with synchronous lung adenocarcinoma harboring an EGFR exon 21 far-loop insertion mutation and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). A multidisciplinary team recommended systemic therapy for the lung adenocarcinoma and clinical observation for ccRCC. First-line treatment with bevacizumab plus pemetrexed-carboplatin achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 months. Second-line treatment with sintilimab and nedaplatin resulted in a PFS of 4.9 months. Third-line therapy with sintilimab and anlotinib proved ineffective. In the fourth line, the patient received furmonertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, based on the FAVOUR trial. This treatment achieved durable disease control with excellent tolerability, yielding a PFS of 27 months and ongoing clinical benefit.

This case demonstrates that furmonertinib can provide significant clinical benefit to NSCLC patients with complex resistance mechanisms, including those involving the PIK3CA/mTOR pathway. These findings support its potential to overcome EGFR-TKI resistance and warrant further investigation in similar clinical contexts.

Although third-generation Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) is standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), little is known about the predictors of response or resistance. Here, we integrated single-cell RNA (scRNA) sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing, multiplexed immunofluorescence and flow cytometry data from pretreatment and post-resistant tumor samples of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received third-generation EGFR-TKIs. We show that resistant samples had a markedly enriched CXCR1+ neutrophils infiltration (P < 0.01) than pretreatment samples, which were distinguished from other subtypes of neutrophils and displayed immunosupressive characteristics. Spatial analysis showed that increased CXCR1+ neutrophils predominantly infiltrated into the tumor core in resistant samples and the average distance of neutrophils to tumor cells markedly reduced from 33 to 19 μm. Deep analysis of scRNA and bulk RNA sequencing data revealed the increased interactions between CXCR1+ neutrophils and tumor cells and activated TNF-α/NF-κB signaling pathway in tumor cells of resistant samples. In vitro and in vivo experiments validated that CXCR1+ neutrophils resulted in resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKI via activating TNF-α/NF-κB signaling pathway in tumor cells. Importantly, patients with low pretreatment CXCR1+ neutrophil infiltration abundance had a dramatically longer progression-free survival (11.8 vs. 7.5 months; P = 0.019) and overall survival (33.0 vs. 23.5 months; P = 0.029) than those with high infiltration abundance. Collectively, these findings suggest that CXCR1+ neutrophils infiltration was associated with the efficacy of third-generation EGFR-TKI in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

In-depth insight into the genomic features of the uncommon EGFR p.L861Q mutant NSCLC is scarcely performed, and no consensus on the preferred treatment strategy has been established. Moreover, the therapeutic implications of EGFR-TKI stratified by clinical and molecular features remained largely unknown.

A multi-center NGS database comprising 44,993 NSCLC samples was utilized for the genomic landscape profiling of EGFR p.L861Q mutation. Furthermore, a real-world cohort of 207 patients harboring EGFR p.L861Q mutation with complete treatment history was curated for comprehensive clinical analysis.

L861Q is prevalent in approximately 2.1% of EGFR-mutated NSCLC and is typically co-mutated with EGFR p.G719X on the same allele (20%) and exhibits co-occurrent EGFR copy number amplification in approximately 17% of cases. In the first-line setting, afatinib and third-generation EGFR-TKI have been shown to yield notably superior treatment outcomes compared to first-generation EGFR-TKI (1st vs.2nd vs.3rd generations, ORR: 15.8% vs.56.5% vs.46.7%, P=0.01; median PFS: 6.4 vs.13.5 vs.15.1 months, P=0.002). This finding consistently held for patients without CNS metastases (1st vs.2nd vs.3rd generations, median PFS:6.0 vs.18.2 vs.14.1 months, P=0.003). In contrast, third-generation EGFR-TKI demonstrated superior efficacy compared to afatinib or first-generation TKI among the subgroup of brain metastasis (Pooled 1st/2nd-generation vs.3rd-generation TKI, brain ORR:0.00% vs.33.33%; median PFS:7.9 vs.19.3 months, P=0.021). Additional concurrent EGFR mutations or EGFR amplification did not yield a discernible impact on the efficacy of EGFR-TKI.

The present study comprehensively elucidates the molecular features of EGFR p.L861Q mutation and underscores the optimal therapeutic choice of first-line EGFR-TKI based on brain metastatic status.

Lung cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumour in the Asia-Pacific region. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancers. Among these, the rate of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma is 40-60%. Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have improved the clinical management of NSCLC with EGFR mutations, but resistance to these drugs remains a significant challenge. Despite numerous ongoing studies, there is no standardized consensus on managing resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs. This consensus integrates international guidelines on EGFR-TKI management, findings from clinical studies, and experiences from the Asia-Pacific region in addressing post-resistance. Detailed recommendations are provided for classification and progression patterns, clinical testing, and post-resistance treatment strategies related to third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance. The aim of these recommendations is to offer reference opinions for the standardized management of patients exhibiting resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs in clinical practice.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and EGFR-TKI combination treatments have become the standard first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the best option has yet to be determined. This study compares the efficacy and safety of various first-line EGFR-TKI monotherapies and combination treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials databases, and several international conferences to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on first-line EGFR-TKI treatments for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The study quality was assessed using the revised tool for risk of bias in randomized trials. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the included treatments were compared by network meta-analysis based on a frequentist approach.

We identified 26 trials (8,359 patients) investigating 14 treatment groups, including first, second, and third-generation EGFR-TKIs and their combination treatments. Osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab showed the highest efficacy in improving progression-free survival. New third-generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated comparable efficacy to osimertinib alone but did not surpass it. Subgroup analyses revealed slight variation in treatment efficacy based on mutation types and patient demographics. Combination treatments were associated with a higher incidence of adverse events.

These results reveal that osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab are superior first-line options for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, these combinations are associated with higher adverse event rates.

ROS1 gene fusions are an established oncogenic driver comprising 1%-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Successful targeting of ROS1 fusion oncoprotein with oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive (ROS1+) NSCLC and transformed outcomes for patients. The preferred Food and Drug Administration-approved first-line therapies include crizotinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib, and currently, selection amongst these options requires consideration of the systemic and CNS efficacy, tolerability, and access to therapy. Of note, resistance to ROS1 TKIs invariably develops, limiting the clinical benefit of these agents and leading to disease relapse. Progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of resistance has enabled the development of numerous next-generation ROS1 TKIs, which achieve broader coverage of ROS1 resistance mutations and superior CNS penetration than first-generation TKIs, as well as other therapeutic strategies to address TKI resistance. The approach to subsequent therapy depends on the pace and pattern of progressive disease on the initial ROS1 TKI and, if known, the mechanisms of TKI resistance. Herein, we describe a practical approach for the selection of initial and subsequent therapies for metastatic ROS1+ NSCLC based on these clinical considerations. Additionally, we explore the evolving evidence for the optimal treatment of earlier-stage, non-metastatic ROS1+ NSCLC, while, in parallel, highlighting future research directions with the goal of continuing to build on the tremendous progress in the management of ROS1+ NSCLC and ultimately improving the longevity and well-being of people living with this disease.