Advances in radiation delivery have expanded the scope of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in lung cancer treatment, as it offers better local control, shorter treatments, and enhanced immunostimulation. This review summarizes recent literature regarding SBRT's role in nonoperable and operable early-stage, locally advanced, central, and oligometastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its mixed results with immunotherapy.

Recent studies demonstrate SBRT achieves excellent local control in inoperable early-stage NSCLC and is being explored as an alternative to surgery for operable cases. Additionally, SBRT can be done safely in central tumors if strict dose limits to normal structures are observed. SBRT shows promise in locally advanced disease, as consolidative local therapy for oligoprogressive and oligometastatic disease and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Advances in adaptive radiation therapy and novel fractionation schedules, including ultra-hypofractionation and personalized approaches, further refine SBRT's role in lung cancer management, with more practice changing clinical trials on the horizon.

SBRT provides durable and well tolerated treatment for patients with localized and metastatic lung cancer. With ongoing trials exploring its synergy with immunotherapy and its applicability in operable patients and large tumors, SBRT is poised to play an even greater role in personalized lung cancer treatment.

This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), focusing on symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) and treatment failure patterns. This retrospective cohort study included 271 patients with early-stage NSCLC (276 lesions) treated with SBRT from May 2012 to January 2022. SBRT was administered according to standardized protocols with doses ranging from 28.5 to 80 Gy in 1 to 10 fractions. Tumor recurrence, RP, and failure patterns were assessed through imaging and clinical evaluations. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were identified using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox models, and logistic regression for RP risk. With a median follow-up of 30.8 months, the 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 96.1, 91.8, and 86.5%, respectively, and LC rates were 98.8, 96.5, and 92.9%, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P=0.002) and higher fractional dose (P=0.041) were significant predictors of OS. Larger tumor size (P<0.001) and higher solid-to-total tumor ratio (P=0.028) were associated with increased local recurrence risk. Symptomatic RP (7.2% of lesions) was associated with solid tumor size (P=0.050). Larger tumors with a higher solid component had more in-field recurrences, while marginal recurrences were often attributable to air space spread and pleural involvement. Higher fractional doses in SBRT benefit patients with early-stage NSCLC, especially those with larger tumors or significant solid components, suggesting that dose escalation or more biologically effective therapies could enhance outcomes and optimize SBRT protocols.

In lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, optimizing plan quality, including dosimetric quality and plan complexity, is paramount for mitigating adverse effects and enhancing dose delivery accuracy. This study evaluated the plan quality of dynamic conformal arc-based volumetric-modulated arc therapy (d-VMAT) as a simplified VMAT compared to conventional VMAT (c-VMAT) across various prescription isodose lines (PIL) and planning target volume (PTV) sizes. Twenty inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed (PTV: 7.6-68.7 cm3). The prescribed dose comprised 48 Gy delivered in four fractions, encompassing 95% of the PTV, with the PIL ranging from 60 to 90% in 10% increments, using a 6X-flattening filter-free beam. The d-VMAT and c-VMAT plans were generated for each patient and PIL setting. Dose indices, including the conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and plan complexity, were assessed for each plan. The GI of d-VMAT closely mirrored that of c-VMAT at 60% and 70% PIL. Nevertheless, d-VMAT exhibited significantly higher GI values than c-VMAT at 80% and 90% PIL, particularly for smaller PTV sizes. Notably, d-VMAT demonstrated reduced plan complexity across all PIL compared to c-VMAT. Clinically, significant differences in CI and dose coverage between d-VMAT and c-VMAT were not observed across varying PIL settings in the range of 60-80%. The dose to the organs at risk with d-VMAT was comparable to that with c-VMAT, except at 90% PIL. In conclusion, the simplification of VMAT treatment plan using d-VMAT demonstrates superior plan quality across various PTV sizes at 60% and 70% PIL.

Data informing the safety, efficacy, treatment logistics, and dosimetry of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung tumors has primarily been derived from patients with favorably located solitary tumors. SBRT is now considered a standard-of-care treatment for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and lung metastases, and therefore extrapolation beyond this limited foundational patient population remains an active source of interest.

This case-based discussion provides a practical framework for delivering SBRT to challenging, yet frequently encountered, cases in radiation oncology. The cases highlighted herein include the use of SBRT for ultracentral tumors, multiple tumors, and reirradiation. Patient characteristics, fractionation, prescription dose, treatment technique, and dose constraints are discussed. Relevant literature to these cases is summarized to provide a framework for the treatment of similar patients.

Treatment of challenging cases with lung SBRT requires many considerations, including treatment intent, fractionation selection, tumor localization, and plan optimization. In such scenarios, patient selection is critical to understanding the risk-benefit profile of an SBRT approach despite significant advances in delivery techniques and safety.

A case-based discussion was developed by the Radiosurgery Society to provide a practical guide to the common challenging scenarios noted above affecting patients with lung tumors. A multidisciplinary approach should guide the treatment of such cases to maximize the therapeutic window.

To generate an understanding of the similarities and variations in international practice patterns for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

An online survey was conducted from October to December 2023, addressing general clinical and technical considerations for lung SABR, and for 5 specific anatomical NSCLC locations (peripheral, abutting chest wall, near brachial plexus, central, and ultra-central). Invitations to participate were extended through email and were distributed on social media.

The survey was completed by 255 radiation oncologists, each representing a single institution across 51 countries. Respondents reported treating a median of 20 cases annually. A total of 38% of participants reported using single-fraction SABR, and 54% applied an upper limit on the maximum dose (Dmax). Among those who applied a Dmax limit, 58% reported a Dmax threshold at ≥130% of the prescription, though this limit varied by region and national economy status. Respondents from low- and middle-income countries were less likely to set a Dmax limit at ≥130% (30% vs. 66%, p < 0.01) and less likely to use single-fraction SABR (14% vs. 44%, p < 0.01). Higher annual SABR patient volumes were associated with higher Dmax adoption (г = 0.23, p < 0.01). Across the 5 clinical scenarios presented; 57 distinct dose regimens were recommended. The most common regimen in each scenario was: 54 Gy in 3 fractions for peripheral tumors, 50 Gy in 5 fractions for apical, central, and abutment of chest wall, and 60 Gy in 8 fractions for ultra-central tumors. Approximately two-thirds of practices recommend a biologically effective dose (BED10) <100 Gy for one or more anatomical sites.

The findings reveal considerable variation in global SABR practice. These differences highlight the need for further data to guide prescription practices, and an international experts' consensus may be beneficial to standardize practice.

There is paucity of data for thoracic in-field reirradiation with two courses of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of repeat SABR as salvage therapy for in-field failures after definitive SABR.

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they involved adult patients treated with salvage SABR for in-field recurrences of lung cancer following prior SABR. To address varying definitions of local failure, studies were included if recurrence occurred within the original planning target volume (PTV). Studies with out-of-field failures (>1 cm from PTV) or those using non-SABR techniques were excluded. Pooled 1- and 2-year local control (LC) rates, overall survival (OS), and toxicities were calculated using a random-effects model. Population-weighted linear regression was employed to assess the relationship between dosimetric and clinico-pathologic variables and patient outcomes.

Twelve studies involving 197 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. All patients received two courses of SABR, with a median total dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Pooled 1- and 2-year LC rates were 78.2 % (95 % CI: 66-87 %) and 68.0 % (95 % CI: 55-79 %), respectively. Patients receiving a cumulative biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 200 Gy had significantly higher LC rates (84.9 %, 95 % CI: 70-93 %) vs (64.9 %, 95 % CI: 54-75 %, p = 0.02). Median OS did not significantly differ between low and high BED groups, though there was a trend toward improved survival with higher BED (21.4 vs 32.6 months). The pooled median OS across all studies was 26.3 months (95 % CI: 25.4-27.1). Improved LC rates were associated with smaller tumours (<2 cm), higher BED from the initial treatment and longer interval (>12 months) between initial and repeat SABR (p < 0.01). Toxicities were minimal, with a pooled incidence of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis at 6.4 % and only 0.10 % reporting ≥ grade 3 toxicity.

Salvage in-field reirradiation with SABR achieves high local control and low toxicity, particularly in patients receiving higher cumulative BED (≥200 Gy) and with longer intervals (≥12 months) between treatments. These results suggest that repeat SABR is a viable salvage option for selected patients. Further prospective studies are needed to optimise dosing and patient selection for safe and effective reirradiation.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an advanced technique that enables precise delivery of radiation directly to a tumor, typically in ≤5 fractions. Single-fraction SBRT for visceral tumors is uncommon, likely related to concerns about risks of geographic tumor miss because of suboptimal cone beam computed tomography scan quality on conventional linear accelerators (linacs). Magnetic resonance (MR) guided linacs are a novel technology offering superior imaging that might facilitate the safe delivery of single-fraction SBRT.

We conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial of single-fraction SBRT delivered on a 0.35 Tesla MR-linac for primary or metastatic lesions of the lung (30-34 Gy; biologically effective dose [BED10] = 120-149.6 Gy10), liver (35-40 Gy; BED10 = 157.5-200 Gy10), pancreas (25 Gy; BED10 = 87.5 Gy10), adrenal gland (25 Gy10), kidney (25 Gy10), and abdominal/pelvic lymph nodes (25 Gy10). Primary objectives included feasibility and safety. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04939246.

The study accrued 30 patients with 32 lesions at 2 centers in the United States between June 2021 and June 2023. All patients had 1 lesion except for 2 with 2 lesions each. Target locations included lung (34.4%), adrenal gland (28.1%), lymph node (18.8%), liver (15.6%), and pancreas (3.1%). The primary objectives were met; total in-room time was <90 minutes for 87.1% of delivered plans and 1 acute grade 3 adverse event was possibly related to single-fraction SBRT. No late grade 3-to-5 adverse events were observed. One-year local control and overall survival were 96.2% (95% CI, 88.8%-100%) and 86.3% (95% CI, 73.8%-98.8%), respectively.

This is the first prospective study to demonstrate that MR guided single-fraction SBRT is feasible, safe, and effective for not only tumors in the peripheral lung, but also the abdomen and pelvis. Future studies should clarify patient selection for single- versus multifraction SBRT.

The optimal SABR treatment delivery schedule in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This population-based study investigated grade ≥2 toxicity rates, local failure (LF), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with 48 Gy in 4 fractions scheduled every other day versus daily with weekends and consecutive daily without weekends.

Between January 2019 and June 2022, treatment records using 48 Gy in 4 fractions were extracted from a provincial cancer registry and grouped by delivery as every other day, daily with weekends, or consecutive daily without weekends. Toxicity events were recorded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute OS and LF was calculated using cumulative incidence methods with death as a competing risk. Cox regression analyses and Fine-Gray modeling was used to assess for variables associated with OS and LF, respectively.

Of 404 patients meeting study criteria, 190, 111, and 103 received SABR every other day, daily with weekends, and consecutive daily without weekends, respectively. More patients receiving SABR daily with weekends were medically inoperable and more patients receiving SABR consecutive daily without weekends had tumors abutting the chest wall. Median follow-up time was 29.5 months (IQR, 19.2-38.4 months). Overall toxicity was low, with crude rates of acute and late grade ≥2 toxicity not being statistically different among the groups. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were recorded. LF rates at 24 months were not different at 7.5% (95% CI, 3.7-11.3), 9.5% (95% CI, 3.9-15.1), and 11.0% (95% CI, 4.9-17.2) for the every other day, daily with weekends, and consecutive daily without weekends groups, respectively (P = .60). Schedules of daily with weekends and consecutive daily without weekends were not associated with LF. Similarly, no significant differences in median OS were found among the every other day, daily with weekends, and consecutive daily without weekends groups at 47.5 months (95% CI, 39.26-55.74), 52.7 months (95% CI, 34.7-70.7), and 49.0 months (95% CI, 31.6-66.4), respectively. Schedules of daily with weekends and consecutive daily without weekends were not associated with OS.

This population-based study demonstrated no statistically significant differences in grade ≥2 toxicity rates, LF, and OS for patients with stage I NSCLC treated with lung SABR using 48 Gy in 4 fractions delivered every other day, daily with weekends, and consecutive daily without weekends. Patient convenience and optimization of resources may be considered when choosing a lung SABR treatment delivery schedule.

The treatment of early stage T1-T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) was previously based on surgery. However, 20 to 25% of patients are inoperable due to their age, comorbidities or refuse surgery. Since 2018, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard treatment for these patients. For operable patients, the comparison surgery - SBRT is difficult without a clear conclusion, the different phase III trials have not yet permitted to provide a formal answer in terms of local control and survival by default of inclusion. Dose and fractionation need to be selected according to tumor location. Tolerance is usually good, with few grade ≥3 toxicities; however, caution is advised for ultra-central tumors and in case of interstitial pneumonia. Post-therapeutic imaging monitoring is complex, sometimes with uncertainties between radiation-induced pneumonitis and relapse. This complexity may increase in ongoing trials combining SBRT and immunotherapy.

Healthcare systems contribute significantly to CO2 emissions, accounting for 7 % of emissions in the Netherlands. Understanding the environmental footprint of medical treatments can help identify opportunities for reducing climate impact. We evaluated the climate impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) when treating T1-2N0M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

We used life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate climate impact in emissions of kilograms of CO2 equivalent. Care trajectories were inventoried for both VATS and SBRT with the same entry and end point of the paths. We analyzed a range of factors contributing to climate impact, such as patient and staff travel, energy consumption, disposables and medication using direct measurements: questionnaires and waste audits, or retrospective record analysis. As is common in LCA, existing infrastructure was excluded from the analysis. Reductions that can be influenced by individual departments were also modeled.

Using LCA we calculated the impact of all categorized contributions for two treatments for NSCLC. In total, VATS generates approximately 547 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2e), whereas SBRT generates 172 kg CO2e per treatment. For SBRT, the largest contributors were energy use in the hospital (52 % of total), of which 22 % is from the linac, and patient travel (23 %). For VATS, major contributions were hospital energy use (52 %) and disposables (23 %). Climate impact could be reduced by 20 % (SBRT) by hypofractionation, reduced linac idle time and patient travel impact, and 13 % (VATS) with fast track recovery and a reduction of disposables.

When treating T1-2N0M0 NSCLC, surgery has a larger climate impact than SBRT. For both modalities reductions are possible.

The standard of care for early-stage NSCLC has historically been surgical resection. Given the association of lung cancer with smoking, a large number of early-stage patients also have active smoking-related medical comorbidities such as COPD precluding surgery. The current approach for treating such inoperable patients is frequently considered to be stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT (also known as stereotactic ablative radiation therapy or SABR) is a curative modality that precisely delivers very high dose radiation in few (typically <5) sessions. That said, because of their minimal invasiveness and repeatable nature, image-guided thermal ablation therapies such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CA) have also been used to treat early-stage lung tumors. For those patients deemed to have "high operative risk" (i.e., those who cannot tolerate lobectomy, but are candidates for sublobar resection), the appropriateness of potential alternatives [e.g., SBRT; ablation] to surgery is an active area of investigation. In the absence of completed randomized phase III trials, the approach to comparing outcomes between surgery, SBRT, or ablative therapies by their efficacy or equivalence is complex. An overview of the role of SBRT and other non-surgical modalities in the management of early-stage lung cancer is the subject of the present review.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as an alternative, non-surgical treatment for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with increased use over time. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) assembled an expert panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature evaluating the results of SABR, which is also referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), prior to developing treatment recommendations for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC based on expert consensus. Publications detailing the findings of 16 prospective studies of SABR and 14 retrospective studies of SABR for the management of early-stage lung cancer in 54,697 patients were identified by systematic review of the literature with further review by members of our expert panel. Medical inoperability (93-95%) was the primary reason for utilizing SABR. The median rate of histologically confirmed cancer in treated patients was 67% (range 57-86%). In retrospective studies and prospective studies, the most common dosing regimens were 48-54Gy in 3-5 fractions and 44-66Gy in 3-5 fractions respectively. The median follow-up after SABR was 30 months (range 15-50). The complications, oncological results and quality of life after SABR in high-risk patients with early-stage NSCLC are summarized in this Expert Review article. Further prospective randomized trials are needed and are currently underway to compare outcomes after SABR with outcomes after sublobar resection to fully evaluate treatment options applicable this high-risk group of patients.

The optimal delivery schedule for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. This study used the National Cancer Database to examine daily versus every other day (QOD) SBRT scheduling, including trends over time and association with survival.

The National Cancer Database was used to retrospectively identify patients with stage I NSCLC treated with 3-, 4-, or 5-fraction of SBRT between 2004 and 2016. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression modeling.

Of 15,269 patients, 3927 (25.7%) received SBRT daily, and 11,342 (74.3%) received treatment QOD. The use of QOD treatment increased from 63.2% in 2007 to 78.3% in 2016, and 5-fraction SBRT increased from 3.7% in 2004 to 51.4% in 2016 (both P < .0001). QOD 5-fraction became the most prevalent scheduling from 2012 to 2016 (28.5% in 2012 to 41.6% in 2016). Factors significantly associated with daily SBRT scheduling included number of fractions, race, lower income, lower comorbidities, and treatment at academic/research programs (all P ≤ .01).Median survival for daily SBRT was 37.9 months versus 38.4 months for QOD (P = .4). On multivariable analysis, no difference was found in overall survival between daily versus QOD scheduling (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.04; P = .55). Five-fraction SBRT was associated with worse survival versus 3 fractions (aHR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.15; P = .002). With 3-fraction SBRT, QOD treatment was associated with improved survival versus daily treatment (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98; P = .02). With 5-fraction SBRT, QOD treatment was associated with worse survival versus daily treatment (aHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .02).

QOD SBRT schedules were more frequently used to treat stage I NSCLC than daily regimens by a factor of 3:1, and QOD 5-fraction SBRT became the most common dose schedule after 2012. Three-fraction QOD SBRT was associated with improved survival versus daily, whereas 5-fraction QOD SBRT was associated with worse survival versus daily.

The aim of this study is to establish dosimetric constraints for the brachial plexus at risk of developing grade ≥ 2 brachial plexopathy in the context of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Individual patient data from 349 patients with 356 apical lung malignancies who underwent SBRT were extracted from 5 articles. The anatomical brachial plexus was delineated following the guidelines provided in the atlases developed by Hall, et al. and Kong, et al.. Patient characteristics, pertinent SBRT dosimetric parameters, and brachial plexopathy grades (according to CTCAE 4.0 or 5.0) were obtained. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were used to estimate the risk of developing grade ≥ 2 brachial plexopathy through maximum likelihood parameter fitting.

The prescription dose/fractionation schedules for SBRT ranged from 27 to 60 Gy in 1 to 8 fractions. During a follow-up period spanning from 6 to 113 months, 22 patients (6.3 %) developed grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy (4.3 % grade 2, 2.0 % grade 3); the median time to symptoms onset after SBRT was 8 months (ranged, 3-54 months). NTCP models estimated a 10 % risk of grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy with an anatomic brachial plexus maximum dose (Dmax) of 20.7 Gy, 34.2 Gy, and 42.7 Gy in one, three, and five fractions, respectively. Similarly, the NTCP model estimates the risks of grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy as 10 % for BED Dmax at 192.3 Gy and EQD2 Dmax at 115.4 Gy with an α/β ratio of 3, respectively. Symptom persisted after treatment in nearly half of patients diagnosed with grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy (11/22, 50 %).

This study establishes dosimetric constraints ranging from 20.7 to 42.7 Gy across 1-5 fractions, aimed at mitigating the risk of developing grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy following SBRT. These findings provide valuable guidance for future ablative SBRT in apical lung malignancies.

Risk-adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy is preferred over conventional radiotherapy at the authors' institution based on the hypothesis that even with a lower than recommended dose, stereotactic body radiation therapy would yield better local control than conventional radiotherapy. This retrospective study was performed to verify the hypothesis. Data from 34 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, who underwent risk-adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy delivered in 4 fractions between 2012 and 2018, were analyzed. The 3-year local control rate for patients receiving 42-44 Gy, 40 Gy, and 32-38 Gy was 80.8%, 75.0%, and 66.7%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 63.5%, 63.5%, and 40.0%, respectively. Three patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, with no toxicities > grade 3 observed. The results support the use of risk-adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy, both with a relatively high dose and a low dose.

Radiotherapy plays a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with all stages of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the standard of care in these patients. The use of ICIs is increasingly utilized in the definitive setting as an adjunct to chemoradiotherapy or surgery and remains a vital component in the treatment of metastatic disease. Despite improvements in patient survival, the use of immunotherapy as monotherapy has shown limited overall response rates with susceptibility to resistance. Radiotherapy has been identified as a viable option to enhance the response rate to ICI and improve outcomes in NSCLC.

We queried the English PubMed database utilizing variably combined search items including "radiation," "chemoradiation," "immune checkpoint," "immunotherapy," "stereotactic body radiotherapy," and "non-small-cell lung". We additionally searched various acceptable alternative terms for similar keywords such as "radiotherapy" in place of "radiation." These results were subsequently curated for relevance and impact on current treatment paradigms.

In this review, we discuss preclinical and clinical studies relating to combinatorial use of immunotherapy and radiation in NSCLC. These studies are presented in the context of early-stage, operable stage III, unresectable stage III, and metastatic disease. The majority of the data illustrate promising results regarding the additive or synergistic effects of radiation and immunotherapy with a suggestion that the timing of these treatment modalities is crucial to optimizing outcomes.

While there is now evidence regarding the favorable interplay between radiation and immunotherapy in NSCLC, there remain multiple unanswered questions which are expected to be addressed in ongoing clinical trials.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has firmly established its role in stage I NSCLC. Clinical trial results may not fully apply to real-world scenarios. This study aimed to uncover the real-world incidence of acute toxicity and 90-day mortality in patients with SBRT-treated stage I NSCLC and develop prediction models for these outcomes.

Prospective data from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Radiotherapy (DLCA-R) were collected nationally. Patients with stage I NSCLC (cT1-2aN0M0) treated with SBRT in 2017 to 2021 were included. Acute toxicity was assessed, defined as grade greater than or equal to 2 radiation pneumonitis or grade greater than or equal to 3 non-hematologic toxicity less than or equal to 90 days after SBRT. Prediction models for acute toxicity and 90-day mortality were developed and internally validated.

Among 7279 patients, the mean age was 72.5 years, with 21.6% being above 80 years. Most were male (50.7%), had WHO scores 0 to 1 (73.3%), and had cT1a-b tumors (64.6%), predominantly in the upper lobes (65.2%). Acute toxicity was observed in 280 (3.8%) of patients and 90-day mortality in 122 (1.7%). Predictors for acute toxicity included WHO greater than or equal to 2, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, no pathology confirmation, middle or lower lobe tumor location, cT1c-cT2a stage, and higher mean lung dose (c-statistic 0.68). Male sex, WHO greater than or equal to 2, and acute toxicity predicted higher 90-day mortality (c-statistic 0.73).

This nationwide study revealed a low rate of acute toxicity and an acceptable 90-day mortality rate in patients with SBRT-treated stage I NSCLC. Notably, advanced age did not increase acute toxicity or mortality risk. Our predictive models, with satisfactory performance, offer valuable tools for identifying high-risk patients.

We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for ultracentral thoracic tumors at our institution.

Patients with ultracentral lung tumors or nodes, defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus, treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All SBRT plans were generated with the goal of creating homogenous dose distributions. The primary endpoint was incidence of SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicity, defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V5.0). Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and identify predictors of severe toxicity and LF, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS.

A total of 154 patients receiving 162 ultracentral courses of SBRT were included. The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%), with doses ranging from 30 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range, 48-115 Gy). The incidence of severe toxicity was 9.4% at 3 years. The most common severe toxicity was pneumonitis (n = 4). There was 1 possible treatment-related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of severe toxicity included increased PTV size, decreased PTV V95%, lung V5 Gy, and lung V20 Gy. The incidence of LF was 14% at 3 years. Predictors of LF included younger age and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. The median PFS was 8.8 months, while the median overall survival was 44.0 months.

In the largest case series of ultracentral thoracic SBRT to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT was associated with relatively low rates of severe toxicity and LF. Predictors of toxicity should be interpreted in the context of the heterogeneity in toxicities observed.

Online adaptive radiotherapy relies on a high degree of automation to enable rapid planning procedures. The Varian Ethos intelligent optimization engine (IOE) was originally designed for conventional treatments so it is crucial to provide clear guidance for lung SAbR plans. This study investigates using the Ethos IOE together with adaptive-specific optimization tuning structures we designed and templated within Ethos to mitigate inter-planner variability in meeting RTOG metrics for both online-adaptive and offline SAbR plans.

We developed a planning strategy to automate the generation of tuning structures and optimization. This was validated by retrospective analysis of 35 lung SAbR cases (total 105 fractions) treated on Ethos. The effectiveness of our planning strategy was evaluated by comparing plan quality with-and-without auto-generated tuning structures. Internal target volume (ITV) contour was compared between that drawn from CT simulation and from cone-beam CT (CBCT) at time of treatment to verify CBCT image quality and treatment effectiveness. Planning strategy robustness for lung SAbR was quantified by frequency of plans meeting reference plan RTOG constraints.

Our planning strategy creates a gradient within the ITV with maximum dose in the core and improves intermediate dose conformality on average by 2%. ITV size showed no significant difference between those contoured from CT simulation and first fraction, and also trended towards decreasing over course of treatment. Compared to non-adaptive plans, adaptive plans better meet reference plan goals (37% vs. 100% PTV coverage compliance, for scheduled and adapted plans) while improving plan quality (improved GI (gradient index) by 3.8%, CI (conformity index) by 1.7%).

We developed a robust and readily shareable planning strategy for the treatment of adaptive lung SAbR on the Ethos system. We validated that automatic online plan re-optimization along with the formulated adaptive tuning structures can ensure consistent plan quality. With the proposed planning strategy, highly ablative treatments are feasible on Ethos.

Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the management of non-metastatic lung cancer, offering curative potential and symptom relief. It serves as a primary treatment modality or adjuvant therapy post-surgery, enhancing local control and survival rates. Modern techniques like Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) enable precise tumor targeting, minimizing damage to healthy tissue and reducing treatment duration. The synergy between radiotherapy and systemic treatments, including immunotherapy, holds promise in improving outcomes. Immunotherapy augments the immune response against cancer cells, potentially enhancing radiotherapy's efficacy. Furthermore, radiotherapy's ability to modulate the tumor microenvironment complements the immunotherapy's mechanism of action. As a result, the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy may offer superior tumor control and survival benefits. Moreover, the integration of radiotherapy with surgery and chemotherapy in multidisciplinary approaches maximizes treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Herein we present an overview on modern radiotherapy and potential developments in the close future.

Limited literature exists on the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) techniques with hyperfractionated regimens for patients with lung cancer. This study aims to assess whether the SABR technique with hyperfractionation can potentially reduce lung toxicity.

We utilized the linear-quadratic model to find the optimal fraction to maximize the tumor biological equivalent dose (BED) to normal-tissue BED ratio. Validation was performed by comparing the SABR plans with 50 Gy/5 fractions and hyperfractionationed plans with 88.8 Gy/74 fractions with the same tumor BED and planning criteria for 10 patients with early-stage lung cancer. Mean lung BED, Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), critical volume (CV) criteria (volume below BED of 22.92 and 25.65 Gy, and mean BED for lowest 1000 and 1500 cc) and the percentage of the lung receiving 20Gy or more (V20) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

The transition point occurs when the tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (TNR) of the physical dose equals the TNR of α/β in the BED dose-volume histogram of the lung. Compared with the hypofractionated regimen, the hyperfractionated regimen is superior in the dose range above but inferior below the transition point. The hyperfractionated regimen showed a lower mean lung BED (6.40 Gy vs. 7.73 Gy) and NTCP (3.50% vs. 4.21%), with inferior results concerning CV criteria and higher V20 (7.37% vs. 7.03%) in comparison with the hypofractionated regimen (p < 0.01 for all).

The hyperfractionated regimen has an advantage in the high-dose region of the lung but a disadvantage in the low-dose region. Further research is needed to determine the superiority between hypo- and hyperfractionation.

Compared with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traditionally plays a very limited role in lung cancer management, although there is plenty of room for improvement in the current CT-based workflow, for example, in structures such as the brachial plexus and chest wall invasion, which are difficult to visualize with CT alone. Furthermore, in the treatment of high-risk tumors such as ultracentral lung cancer, treatment-associated toxicity currently still outweighs its benefits. The advent of MR-Linac, an MRI-guided radiotherapy (RT) that combines MRI with a linear accelerator, could potentially address these limitations. Compared with CT-based technologies, MR-Linac could offer superior soft tissue visualization, daily adaptive capability, real-time target tracking, and an early assessment of treatment response. Clinically, it could be especially advantageous in the treatment of central/ultracentral lung cancer, early-stage lung cancer, and locally advanced lung cancer. Increasing demands for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer have led to MR-Linac adoption in some cancer centers. In this review, a broad overview of the latest research on imaging-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) with MR-Linac for lung cancer management is provided, and development pertaining to artificial intelligence is also highlighted. New avenues of research are also discussed.

Aim/objectives: Single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SF-SBRT) for peripheral lung tumors was reviewed. Materials & methods: Medically inoperable peripheral lung tumors eligible for SF-SBRT 34 Gray were treated. Patient characteristics, treatment and toxicity parameters were retrospectively collected, and toxicities were evaluated. Results: A total of 26 patients were assessed with median age of 74 years. Ninety-six percent had early-stage cancer and 35% were treated as per the SABR-BRIDGE protocol. Twenty-six peripheral lesions were treated (median maximal dimension 1.7 cm). Sixty-five percent had grade ≤2 toxicities with radiation pneumonitis (42.3%) and chest wall pain (35%). Radiation pneumonitis and chest wall pain rates were higher in patients with tumor diameters more than 1.5 cm. Conclusion: SF-SBRT is practical and effective treatment technique.

Immunotherapy, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has significantly transformed cancer treatment. Despite its success, many patients struggle to respond adequately or sustain long-lasting clinical improvement. A growing consensus has emerged that radiotherapy (RT) enhances the response rate and overall efficacy of immunotherapy. Although combining RT and immunotherapy has been extensively investigated in preclinical models and has shown promising results, establishing itself as a dynamic and thriving area of research, clinical evidence for this combination strategy over the past five years has shown both positive and disappointing results, suggesting the need for a more nuanced understanding. This review provides a balanced and updated analysis of the combination of immunotherapy and RT. We summarized the preclinical mechanisms through which RT boosts antitumor immune responses and mainly focused on the outcomes of recently updated clinical trials, including those that may not have met expectations. We investigated the optimization of the therapeutic potential of this combined strategy, including key challenges, such as fractionation and scheduling, lymph node irradiation, and toxicity. Finally, we offered insights into the prospects and challenges associated with the clinical translation of this combination therapy, providing a realistic perspective on the current state of research and potential future directions.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly used for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) and for pulmonary metastases. In patients with ES-NSCLC, SABR is highly successful with reported 5-year local control rates of approximately 90%. However, the assessment of local control following lung SABR can be challenging as radiological changes arising from radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) can be observed in up to 90% of patients. These so-called 'benign' radiological changes evolve with time and are often asymptomatic. Several radiological and metabolic features have been explored to help distinguish RILI from local recurrences (LR). These include the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST), high-risk features (HRF's) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET-CT. However, use of some of these approaches have poor predictive values and low specificity for recurrence. A proposed new workflow for the evaluation of post-lung SABR radiological changes will be reviewed which uses the presence of so-called 'actionable radiological features' to trigger changes to imaging schedules and identifies the need for a multidisciplinary board review. Furthermore, this critical review of post-lung SABR imaging will highlight current challenges, new insights, and unknowns in this field.

Concerns over chest wall toxicity has led to debates on treating tumors adjacent to the chest wall with single-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). We performed a secondary analysis of patients treated on the prospective iSABR trial to determine the incidence and grade of chest wall pain and modeled dose-response to guide radiation planning and estimate risk.

This analysis included 99 tumors in 92 patients that were treated with 25 Gy in one fraction on the iSABR trial which individualized dose by tumor size and location. Toxicity events were prospectively collected and graded based on the CTCAE version 4. Dose-response modeling was performed using a logistic model with maximum likelihood method utilized for parameter fitting.

There were 22 grade 1 or higher chest wall pain events, including five grade 2 events and zero grade 3 or higher events. The volume receiving at least 11 Gy (V11Gy) and the minimum dose to the hottest 2 cc (D2cc) were most highly correlated with toxicity. When dichotomized by an estimated incidence of ≥ 20 % toxicity, the D2cc > 17 Gy (36.6 % vs. 3.7 %, p < 0.01) and V11Gy > 28 cc (40.0 % vs. 8.1 %, p < 0.01) constraints were predictive of chest wall pain, including among a subset of patients with tumors abutting or adjacent to the chest wall.

For small, peripheral tumors, single-fraction SABR is associated with modest rates of low-grade chest wall pain. Proximity to the chest wall may not contraindicate single fractionation when using highly conformal, image-guided techniques with sharp dose gradients.

Histology was found to be an important prognostic factor for local tumor control probability (TCP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A histology-driven SBRT approach has not been explored in routine clinical practice and histology-dependent fractionation schemes remain unknown. Here, we analyzed pooled histologic TCP data as a function of biologically effective dose (BED) to determine histology-driven fractionation schemes for SBRT and hypofractionated radiotherapy of two predominant early-stage NSCLC histologic subtypes adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

The least-χ2 method was used to fit the collected histologic TCP data of 8510 early-stage NSCLC patients to determine parameters for a well-developed radiobiological model per the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) initiative.

A fit to the histologic TCP data yielded independent radiobiological parameter sets for radiotherapy of early-stage lung ADC and SCC. TCP increases steeply with BED and reaches an asymptotic maximal plateau, allowing us to determine model-independent optimal fractionation schemes of least doses in 1-30 fractions to achieve maximal tumor control for early-stage lung ADC and SCC, e.g., 30, 44, 48, and 51 Gy for ADC, and 32, 48, 54, and 58 Gy for SCC in 1, 3, 4, and 5 fractions, respectively.

We presented the first determination of histology-dependent radiobiological parameters and model-independent histology-driven optimal SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy schemes for early-stage lung ADC and SCC. SCC requires substantially higher radiation doses to maximize tumor control than ADC, plausibly attributed to tumor genetic diversity and microenvironment. The determined optimal SBRT schemes agree well with clinical practice for early-stage lung ADC. These proposed optimal fractionation schemes provide first insights for histology-based personalized radiotherapy of two predominant early-stage NSCLC subtypes ADC and SCC, which require further validation with large-scale histologic TCP data.

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard of care for medically inoperable patients with Stage I NSCLC. The adoption of SABR and its association with cancer outcomes requires characterization.

We described the management of biopsy-proven Stage I NSCLC with SABR, surgery, non-SABR curative radiotherapy (RT) and observation in Ontario, Canada, between 2010 and 2019. Temporal and geographic trends in practice and survival outcomes were analyzed.

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study conducted by linking electronic radiotherapy (RT) records to a population-based cancer registry.

A total of 12,065 patients were identified, 61.7 % underwent surgery, 17.9 % received SABR, 8.6 % received non-SABR curative RT and 11.7 % were observed. Between 2010 and 2019, the utilization of surgery decreased (63.8 % to 49.9 %, p < 0.0001), while SABR use increased (7.5 % to 24.4 %, p < 0.0001), non-SABR curative RT use increased (6.7 % to 9.6 %, p < 0.0014) and patients observed decreased (14.4 % to 12.0 %, p < 0.0001). Substantial variation in practice exists across Ontario. Two- yr CSS improved for the entire cohort (81.9 % to 85.0 %, p < 0.0001). While there was improvement in 2 yr CSS for surgical patients (92.1 %% to 95.7 %, p < 0.001), survival for patients who received SABR, Non-SABR curative RT and observation remained stable.

There has been an increase in SABR utilization and a reduction in surgical utilization with a corresponding increased survival of stage I patients in Ontario between 2010 and 2019. Substantial differences in practice patterns exist across health regions, suggesting the need for strategies to improve access to SABR in many jurisdictions.

Purpose We sought to explore the feasibility of using the current co-planar Halcyon ring delivery system (RDS) with a novel multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture shape controller in delivering a single high dose of 30 Gy to solitary lung lesions via stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods Thirteen non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with a single dose of 30 Gy to lung lesions via SBRT on the TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs were anonymized and replanned onto the Halcyon RDS (6MV-FFF) following RTOG-0915 single-fraction criteria. The Halcyon plans utilized a novel dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based MLC-fitting approach before VMAT optimization with a user-defined aperture shape controller option. The clinical TrueBeam and Halcyon plans were compared via their protocol compliance, target conformity, gradient index, and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR). Treatment delivery efficacy and accuracy were assessed through end-to-end quality assurance (QA) tests on Halcyon and independent dose verification via in-house Monte Carlo (MC) second-check validation. Results All Halcyon lung SBRT plans met RTOG-0915 protocol's requirements for target coverage, conformity, and gradient indices, and maximum dose 2 cm away from the target (D2cm) while being statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) when compared to clinical TrueBeam plans. Additionally, Halcyon provided a similar dose to OAR except for the ribs, where Halcyon demonstrated a lower maximum dose (15.22 Gy vs 17.01 Gy, p < 0.001). However, Halcyon plans required a higher total monitor unit (8892 MU vs 7413 MU, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher beam modulation factor (2.96 MU/cGy vs 2.47 MU/cGy, p < 0.001) and an increase in beam-on time by a factor of 2.1 (11.11 min vs 5.3 min, p < 0.005). End-to-end QA measurements demonstrate that Halcyon plans were clinically acceptable with an average gamma passing rate of 99.8% for 2%/2mm criteria and independent MC 2nd checks within ±2.86%. Conclusion Our end-to-end testing and validation study demonstrates that by utilizing a DCA-based MLC aperture shape controller before VMAT optimization, Halcyon can be used for delivering a single dose of lung SBRT treatment. However, future improvements of Halcyon RDS are recommended to allow higher output rates, rotational couch corrections, and an integrated intrafraction motion management system that will further enhance Halcyon's capability for site-specific single dosage of SBRT.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC), but which patients benefit from stereotactic radiotherapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for early mortality.

From August 2010 to 2022, 617 patients with medically inoperable, peripheral or central ES-NSCLC were treated with SABR at our institution. We retrospectively evaluated the data from 172 consecutive patients treated from 2018 to 2020 to analyze the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). The biological effective dose was > 100 Gy10 in all patients, and 60 Gy was applied in 3-5 fractions for a gross tumor volume (GTV) + 3 mm margin when the tumor diameter was < 1 cm; 30-33 Gy was delivered in one fraction. Real-time tumor tracking or an internal target volume approach was applied in 96% and 4% of cases, respectively. In uni- and multivariate analysis, a Cox model was used for the following variables: ventilation parameter FEV1, histology, age, T stage, central vs. peripheral site, gender, pretreatment PET, biologically effective dose (BED), and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI).

The median OS was 35.3 months. In univariate analysis, no correlation was found between OS and ventilation parameters, histology, PET, or centrality. Tumor diameter, biological effective dose, gender, and AACCI met the criteria for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. The multivariate model showed that males (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; p = 0.05) and AACCI > 5 (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.31; p = 0.026) were significant negative prognostic factors of OS. However, the analysis of OS showed that the significant effect of AACCI > 5 was achieved only after 3 years (3-year OS 37% vs. 56%, p = 0.021), whereas the OS in one year was similar (1-year OS 83% vs. 86%, p = 0.58).

SABR of ES-NSCLC with precise image guidance is feasible for all medically inoperable patients with reasonable performance status. Early deaths were rare in our real-life cohort, and OS is clearly higher than would have been expected after best supportive care.

The generality of a model for predicting tumor control probability from in vitro clonogenic survival considering of cancer stem-like cells, the so-called integrated microdosimetric-kinetic model, is presented by comparing the model to public data on stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer cells.

To analyze the efficacy of stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (SABT) and percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients with early-stage (T1-T2aN0M0) NSCLC who underwent CT-guided SABT or MWA between October 2014 and March 2017 at four medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. Survival, treatment response, and procedure-related complications were assessed.

A total of 83 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 55.2 months (range 7.2-76.8 months). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.4%, 82.3%, and 68.4% for the SABT group (n = 28), and 96.4%, 79.7%, and 63.2% for MWA group (n = 55), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 92.9%, 74.6%, and 54.1% for SABT, and 92.7%, 70.5%, and 50.5% for MWA, respectively. There were no significant differences between SABT and MWA in terms of OS (p = 0.631) or DFS (p = 0.836). The recurrence rate was also similar between the two groups (p = 0.809). No procedure-related deaths occurred. Pneumothorax was the most common adverse event in the two groups, with no significant difference. No radiation pneumonia was found in the SABT group.

SABT provided similar efficacy to MWA for the treatment of stage I NSCLC. SABT may be a treatment option for unresectable early-stage NSCLC. However, future prospective randomized studies are required to verify these results.

A series of radiobiological models were developed to study tumor control probability (TCP) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) per the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) working group. This study was conducted to further validate 3 representative models with the recent clinical TCP data ranging from conventional radiation therapy to SBRT of early-stage NSCLC and to determine systematic optimal fractionation regimens in 1 to 30 fractions for radiation therapy of early-stage NSCLC that were found to be model-independent.

Recent clinical 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial or Kaplan-Meier TCP data of 9808 patients from 56 published papers were collected for radiation therapy of 2 to 4 Gy per fraction and SBRT of early-stage NSCLC. This data set nearly triples the original HyTEC sample, which was used to further validate the HyTEC model parameters determined from a fit to the clinical TCP data.

TCP data from the expanded data set are well described by the HyTEC models with α/β ratios of about 20 Gy. TCP increases sharply with biologically effective dose and reaches an asymptotic maximal plateau, which allows us to determine optimal fractionation schemes for radiation therapy of early-stage NSCLC.

The HyTEC radiobiological models with α/β ratios of about 20 Gy determined from the fits to the clinical TCP data for SBRT of early-stage NSCLC describe the recent TCP data well for both radiation therapy of 2 to 4 Gy per fraction and SBRT dose and fractionation schemes of early-stage NSCLC. A steep dose response exists between TCP and biologically effective dose, and TCP reaches an asymptotic maximum. This feature results in model-independent optimal fractionation regimens determined whenever safe for SBRT and hypofractionated radiation therapy of early-stage NSCLC in 1 to 30 fractions to achieve asymptotic maximal tumor control, and T2 tumors require slightly higher optimal doses than T1 tumors. The proposed optimal fractionation schemes are consistent with clinical practice for SBRT of early-stage NSCLC.

The treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has improved enormously in the last two decades. Although surgery is not the only choice, lobectomy is still the gold standard treatment type for operable patients. For inoperable patients stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) should be offered, reaching very high local control and overall survival rates. With SBRT we can precisely irradiate small, well-defined lesions with high doses. To select the appropriate fractionation schedule it is important to determine the size, localization and extent of the lung tumor. The introduction of novel and further developed planning (contouring guidelines, diagnostic image application, planning systems) and delivery techniques (motion management, image guided radiotherapy) led to lower rates of side effects and more conformal target volume coverage. The purpose of this study is to summarize the current developments, randomised studies, guidelines about lung SBRT, with emphasis on the possibility of increasing local control and overall rates in "fit," operable patients as well, so SBRT would be eligible in place of surgery.

We investigated the survival and patterns of failure in adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SF-SBRT) of 27-34 Gray. A single-institution retrospective review of patients with biopsy-proven early stage ADC or SCC undergoing definitive SF-SBRT between September 2008 and February 2023 was performed. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes included local failure (LF), nodal failure (NF), and distant failure (DF). Of 292 eligible patients 174 had adenocarcinoma and 118 had squamous cell carcinoma. There was no significant change in any outcome except distant failure. Patients with ADC were significantly more likely to experience distant failure than patients with SCC (p = 0.0081). In conclusion, while SF-SBRT produced similar LF, NF, DFS, and OS, the higher rate of distant failure in ADC patients suggests that ongoing trials of SBRT and systemic therapy combinations should report their outcomes by histology.

The global cancer burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), worsens existing disparities, amplified by the rising costs of advanced treatments. The shortage of radiation therapy (RT) services is a significant issue in LMICs. Extended conventional treatment regimens pose significant challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) and ultra-hypofractionated/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offer promising alternatives by shortening treatment durations. This approach optimizes the utilization of radiotherapy machines, making them more effective in meeting the growing demand for cancer care. Adopting HRT/SBRT holds significant potential, especially in LMICs. This review provides the latest clinical evidence and guideline recommendations for the application of HRT/SBRT in the treatment of breast, prostate, and lung cancers. It emphasizes the critical importance of rigorous training, technology, stringent quality assurance, and safety protocols to ensure precise and secure treatments. Additionally, it addresses practical considerations for implementing these treatments in LMICs, highlighting the need for comprehensive support and collaboration to enhance patient access to advanced cancer care.