Aberrant Wnt signaling has been implicated in prostate cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis in preclinical models but the impact of genetic alterations in Wnt signaling genes in men with advanced prostate cancer is unknown.

We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical-genomic database for this retrospective analysis. Patients with activating mutations in CTNNB1 or RSPO2 or inactivating mutations in APC, RNF43, or ZNRF3 were defined as Wnt-altered, while those lacking such alterations were defined as Wnt non-altered. We compared patient characteristics and clinical outcomes as well as co-occurring genetic alterations according to Wnt alteration status.

Of the 1498 patients included, 193 (12.9%) were Wnt-altered. These men had a statistically significant 2-fold increased prevalence of liver and lung metastases as compared with Wnt non-altered patients at the time of initial diagnosis, (4.66% v 2.15% ; 6.22% v 3.07%), first metastatic disease diagnosis (10.88% v 5.29%; 13.99% v 6.21%), and CRPC development (11.40% v 6.36%; 12.95% v 5.29%). Wnt alterations were associated with more co-occurring alterations in RB1 (10.4% v 6.2%), AR (38.9% vs 25.7%), SPOP (13.5% vs 4.1%), FOXA1 (6.7% vs 2.8%), and PIK3CA (10.9% vs 5.1%). We found no significant differences in overall survival or other clinical outcomes from initial diagnosis, first metastatic disease, diagnosis of CRPC, or with AR inhibition for mCRPC between the Wnt groups.

Wnt-altered patients with prostate cancer have a higher prevalence of visceral metastases and are enriched in RB1, AR, SPOP, FOXA1, and PIK3CA alterations. Despite these associations, Wnt alterations were not associated with worse survival or treatment outcomes in men with advanced prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) have significantly changed the preferred treatments for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Despite such advances, the prognostic significance of metastases at specific sites remains unclear. This study evaluated how metastatic site affected the oncological outcomes of mCSPC patients.

This retrospective multicenter study included 716 mCSPC patients receiving androgen- deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy, or both ARSI and ADT (ARSI doublet) from February 2018 to June 2023. All patients were categorized based on their metastatic sites. The primary endpoint was the time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) development; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox's regression models were used to analyze the survival outcomes. We stratified mCSPC patients with bone metastases by the volumes of such metastases and lung metastasis status, and explored the clinical significance of lung metastasis.

Patients with lung-only metastases experienced better outcomes than those with other visceral metastases. On multivariate analysis, the bone metastasis volume, but not lung metastasis status, significantly affected CRPC-free survival status. No significant difference in any of CRPC, PFS2, CSS, or OS status was apparent among patients with bone metastases with or without lung metastases. In terms of interaction, lung metastasis did not significantly affect the prognoses of patients with either low- or high-volume bone metastases.

In the present era of ARSI doublet therapy, lung-only metastases in mCSPC patients were associated with favorable outcomes. The negative prognostic effects of lung metastases were much lower than was the bone metastasis volume, indicating that treatments targeting low-volume disease may be adequate even when lung metastases are apparent.

This study was conducted to better characterize the epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and current treatment patterns of de novo oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC) in the United States Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

In this observational retrospective cohort study, 400 de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) patients diagnosed from January 2015 to December 2020 (follow-up through December 2021) were randomly selected. omHSPC was defined as five or less total metastases (excluding liver) by conventional imaging. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated overall survival (OS) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival from mHSPC diagnosis date and a log-rank test compared these outcomes by oligometastatic status.

Twenty percent (79 of 400) of de novo mHSPC patients were oligometastatic. Most baseline characteristics were similar by oligometastatic status; however, men with non-omHSPC had higher median prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis (151.7) than omHSPC (44.1). First-line (1L) novel hormonal therapy was similar between groups (20%); 1L chemotherapy was lower in omHSPC (5%) versus non-omHSPC (14%). More omHSPC patients received metastasis-directed therapy/prostate radiation therapy (14%) versus non-omHSPC (2%). Median OS and CRPC-free survival (in months) were higher in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC (44.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33.9-not estimated vs. 26.2; 95% CI, 20.5-32.5, p = .0089 and 27.6; 95% CI, 22.1-37.2 vs. 15.3; 95% CI, 12.8-17.9, p = .0049), respectively.

Approximately 20% of de novo mHSPC were oligometastatic, and OS was significantly longer in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC. Although potentially "curative" therapy use was higher in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC, the percentages were still relatively low. Future studies are warranted given potential for prolonged responses with multimodal therapy inclusive of systemic and local therapies.

The prognostic value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in primary high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients treated with novel hormonal therapy agents is still unclear. Here, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 102 patients with primary high-volume mHSPC who received novel hormonal therapy agents. The median follow-up was 32.25 ± 14.51 months and the median nadir PSA (nPSA) was 0.20 (0.06, 11.71) ng/mL after treatment. The mean time to nPSA was 10.82 ± 7.27 months and 55 patients (53.9%) had a PSA-density (PSA-D) ≤ 0.08 at 3-months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the absence of visceral metastases, nPSA ≤ 0.2 and PSA-D ≤ 0.08 were independent prognostic factors for better PFS and OS (all P < 0.05). Moreover, patients with nPSA ≤ 0.2 and PSA-D ≤ 0.08 had the best PFS and OS, and the combination of the nPSA and PSA-D had a better predictive accuracy for PFS and OS than nPSA and PSA-D alone. Thus, Visceral metastases, nPSA and PSA-D were independent prognostic factors for primary high-volume mHSPC patients treated with novel hormonal therapy agents. Patients with lower nPSA and PSA-D had a best survival outcome, and the combination of nPSA and PSA-D had a better effect on prognosis predicting.

Abiraterone treatment requires regular drug intake under fasting conditions due to pronounced food effect, which may impact patient adherence. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate adherence to abiraterone treatment in patients with prostate cancer. To achieve this aim, an abiraterone population pharmacokinetic model was developed and patients' adherence has been estimated by comparison of measured levels of abiraterone with population model-based simulations.

A total of 1469 abiraterone plasma levels from 83 healthy volunteers collected in a bioequivalence study were analysed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model. Monte Carlo simulation was used to describe the theoretical distribution of abiraterone pharmacokinetic profiles at a dose of 1000 mg once daily. Adherence of 36 prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone was then evaluated by comparing the real abiraterone concentration measured in each patient during follow-up visit with the theoretical distribution of profiles based on simulations. Patients whose abiraterone levels were ˂5th or ˃95th percentile of the distribution of simulated profiles were considered to be non-adherent.

Based on this evaluation, 13 patients (36%) have been classified as non-adherent. We observed significant association (P = .0361) between richness of the breakfast and rate of non-adherence. Adherent patients reported significantly better overall condition in self-assessments (P = .0384). A trend towards a higher occurrence of adverse effects in non-adherent patients was observed.

We developed an abiraterone population pharmacokinetic model and proposed an advanced approach to medical adherence evaluation. Due to the need for administration under fasting conditions, abiraterone therapy is associated with a relatively high rate of non-adherence.

Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC.

We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC.

Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005).

We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.

Liver metastases from prostate cancer are associated with an aggressive disease course and poor prognosis. Results from autopsy studies indicate a liver metastasis prevalence of up to 25% in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Population data estimate that ~3-10% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harbour liver metastases at the baseline, rising to 20-30% in post-treatment cohorts, suggesting that selective pressure imposed by novel therapies might promote metastatic spread to the liver. Liver metastases are associated with more aggressive tumour biology than lung metastases. Molecular profiling of liver lesions showed an enrichment of low androgen receptor, neuroendocrine phenotypes and high genomic instability. Despite advancements in molecular imaging modalities such as prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT, and liquid biopsy markers such as circulating tumour DNA, early detection of liver metastases from prostate cancer remains challenging, as both approaches are hampered by false positive and false negative results, impeding the accurate identification of early liver lesions. Current therapeutic strategies showed limited efficacy in this patient population. Emerging targeted radionuclide therapies, metastasis-directed therapy, and novel systemic agents have shown preliminary activity against liver metastases, but require further validation. Treatment with various novel prostate cancer therapies might lead to an increase in the prevalence of liver metastasis, underscoring the urgent need for coordinated efforts across preclinical and clinical researchers to improve characterization, monitoring, and management of liver metastases from prostate cancer. Elucidating molecular drivers of liver tropism and interactions with the liver microenvironment might ultimately help to identify actionable targets to enhance survival in this high-risk patient group.

Prostate carcinoma (PC), the second most diagnosed cancer globally, saw approximately 1,414,000 new cases in 2020, with 17% being de novo metastatic. In these cases, the 5-year relative survival rate is 32%. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) includes those with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis or after initial therapy without long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), eventually progressing to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The established therapeutic principle of ADT has persisted for 80 years, with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists like leuprorelin being commonly used. LHRH antagonists, such as degarelix, have also emerged. Recent advances in mHSPC treatment involve combination strategies with drugs proven effective in CRPC, considering prognostic factors like disease volume and presentation. This review outlines pivotal trials leading to drug approvals in mHSPC and proposes a treatment decision algorithm for the same, based on statement from the Tuscan Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncological Group. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to tailor treatment intensity and weigh risks and benefits effectively.

Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is currently an incurable disease. Despite a high response rate to androgen-deprivation therapy, most cases progress to castration-resistant disease, the terminal phase. This review provides a summary of the most recent evidence for current and emerging management strategies, including treatment intensification with combinations of therapies. It also provides recommendations on applying the evidence in clinical practice to encourage appropriate treatment to improve survival outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Androgen-deprivation therapy is the backbone of treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; however, it is insufficient alone to provide sustained disease control and long-term survival. Addition of an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and/or docetaxel significantly improves survival, as demonstrated by several international phase 3 randomized clinical trials. Triplet therapy composed of androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel has been shown to improve overall survival over androgen-deprivation therapy plus docetaxel. In the ARASENS trial (darolutamide), the hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.80) in the overall population; 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59-0.85) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.35-1.05) in patients with de novo and recurrent disease, respectively; 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.41-1.13) in patients with high-volume and low-volume disease, respectively; and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58-0.86) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.42-0.90) in patients with high-risk and low-risk disease, respectively. In the PEACE-1 trial (abiraterone acetate + prednisone), the HRs were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.95; all de novo) in the overall population and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.95) and immature in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups, respectively. In the ENZAMET trial (enzalutamide), the HRs were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-1.06) in the overall population; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.99) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65-1.86) in the de novo and recurrent subgroups, respectively; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66-1.17) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.33-1.10) in the high-volume and low-volume subgroups. Combination regimens are generally well tolerated, with adverse effects dependent on the profiles of the component drugs.

The findings of this review show compelling evidence from phase 3 randomized clinical trials in favor of initiating triplet combination therapy for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer for the best overall survival. Patients who are eligible for chemotherapy should be offered androgen-deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor plus docetaxel, particularly patients with high-volume, high-risk, or de novo metastatic disease.

Despite major increases in the longevity of men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), most men still die of prostate cancer. Phase III trials assessing new therapies in mHSPC with overall survival (OS) as the primary end point will take approximately a decade to complete. We investigated whether radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and clinical PFS (cPFS) are valid surrogates for OS in men with mHSPC and could potentially be used to expedite future phase III clinical trials.

We obtained individual patient data (IPD) from 9 eligible randomized trials comparing treatment regimens (different androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] strategies or ADT plus docetaxel in the control or research arms) in mHSPC. rPFS was defined as the time from random assignment to radiographic progression or death from any cause whichever occurred first; cPFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of radiographic progression, symptoms, initiation of new treatment, or death, whichever occurred first. We implemented a two-stage meta-analytic validation model where conditions of patient-level and trial-level surrogacy had to be met. We then computed the surrogate threshold effect (STE).

IPD from 6,390 patients randomly assigned from 1994 to 2012 from 13 units were pooled for a stratified analysis. The median OS, rPFS, and cPFS were 4.3 (95% CI, 4.2 to 4.5), 2.4 (95% CI, 2.3 to 2.5), and 2.3 years (95% CI, 2.2 to 2.4), respectively. The STEs were 0.80 and 0.81 for rPFS and cPFS end points, respectively.

Both rPFS and cPFS appear to be promising surrogate end points for OS. The STE of 0.80 or higher makes it viable for either rPFS or cPFS to be used as the primary end point that is surrogate for OS in phase III mHSPC trials with testosterone suppression alone as the backbone therapy and would expedite trial conduct.

In recent years, several systemic therapies have been introduced for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with docetaxel (Doc) and/or new-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI). Trials evaluating ADT + ARSI have consistently demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit for doublet therapy over ADT alone. Similarly, the STOPCaP meta-analysis showed an OS benefit in favor of ADT + Doc versus ADT alone. ARSI, Doc, and ADT have different antitumor mechanisms, thus potentiating the effect of combination therapy. Two randomized trials showed that the addition of ARSI to ADT + Doc improves OS, especially for synchronous high-volume disease. However, the real question about triplet therapy remains unanswered: whether combining Doc with ARSI improves outcomes compared to ADT + ARSI. As there are no head-to-head comparisons, this narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding triplet therapy versus doublet therapy including ADT+ ARSI.

Up to 30% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) develop visceral metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis.

Efficacy of enzalutamide in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases, including visceral and/or extra-regional lymph nodes.

In this phase II multicenter study, patients with mCRPC and measurable metastases received enzalutamide as the first line. Primary endpoint: 3-month (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of patients with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoint: safety. Exploratory endpoint: the association between ARv7 splicing variants in basal circulating tumor cell (CTC)-enriched blood samples and treatment response/resistance using the AdnaTest ProstateCancerSelect kit and the AdnaTest ProstateCancer Panel AR-V7.

From March 2017 to January 2021, 68 patients were enrolled. One patient never started treatment. Median age: 72 years. A total of 52 patients (78%) received enzalutamide as a first line for mCRPC. The median follow-up was 32 months. At the 3-month assessment, 24 patients presented an SD, 1 patient achieved a CR, and 23 patients had a PR (3-mo-DCR of 72%). Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 9%, 6%, and 48% of patients. All patients reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 AE: the most common were fatigue (49%) and hypertension (33%). Six G3 AEs were reported: two hypertension, one seizure, one fatigue, one diarrhea, and one headache. Basal detection of ARv7 was significantly associated with poor treatment response (p = 0.034) and a nonsignificant association (p = 0.15) was observed between ARv7 detection and response assessments. At month 3, ARv7 was detected in 57%, 25%, and 15% of patients undergoing progressive disease, SD, and PR, respectively.

The study met its primary endpoint, showing the efficacy of enzalutamide in men with mCRPC and measurable metastatic lesions in visceral and/or lymph node sites.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03103724. First Posted: 6 April 2017. First patient enrollment: 19 April 2017.

To quantify the stage-shift with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging in metastatic prostate cancer and explore treatment implications.

Single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed [18F]PSMA-1007 or [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-detected metastatic prostate cancer who had baseline bone scintigraphy between January 2015 and May 2021. Patients were subclassified into oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease utilizing the STAMPEDE2 trial (ISRCTN66357938/NCT06320067) definition. Patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected. PSMA PET/CT concordance with conventional imaging (bone scintigraphy and low-dose CT of PET) was identified by number and site of metastases, and subgroup assigned. Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression modelling determined the association between the imaging modalities.

We analysed 62 patients with a median age was 72 years (range 48-86). On PSMA PET/CT, 31/62 (50%) patients had oligometastatic disease, and 31/62 (50%) had polymetastatic disease. Prostate radiotherapy was delivered in 20/31 (65%) patients with oligometastatic disease and 17/31 (55%) with polymetastatic disease. 23/62 (37%) patients were reclassified as M0 on conventional imaging. PSMA PET/CT had a 2.9-fold increase in detecting bone metastases. Bone metastases concordance was found in 10/50 (20%) by number and 30/33 (91%) by site. PSMA PET/CT had a 2.2-fold increase in detecting nodal metastases. Nodal metastases concordance was found in 5/46 (11%) by number and 25/26 (96%) by site. There was significant positive correlation between PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging for detecting bone [R 2 = 0.25 (P < 0.001)] and nodal metastases [R 2 = 0.19 (P < 0.001)]. 16/31 (52%) had oligometastatic disease concordance.

The magnitude of PSMA PET/CT-driven stage-shift is highly variable and unpredictable with implications on treatment decisions, future trial design, and potentially clinical outcomes.

The magnitude of "frame-shift" with PSMA PET/CT imaging is highly variable and unpredictable which may unreliably change treatment decisions dependent on image-defined disease extent. Prospective randomized trials are required to determine the relationship between PSMA PET/CT-guided treatment choices and outcomes.

Since the start of the 21st century, prostate cancer with lung metastasis (PCLM) has accumulated significant scientific research output. However, a systematic knowledge framework for PCLM is still lacking.

To reconstruct the global knowledge system in the field of PCLM, sort out hot research directions, and provide reference for the clinical and mechanism research of PCLM.

We retrieved 280 high-quality papers from the Web of Science Core Collection and conducted a bibliometric analysis of keywords, publication volume, and citation frequency. Additionally, we selected differentially expressed genes from global high-throughput datasets and performed enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction analysis to further summarize and explore the mechanisms of PCLM.

PCLM has received extensive attention over the past 22 years, but there is an uneven spatial distribution in PCLM research. In the clinical aspect, the treatment of PCLM is mainly based on chemotherapy and immunotherapy, while diagnosis relies on methods such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography. In the basic research aspect, the focus is on cell adhesion molecules and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, among others. Traditional treatments, such as chemotherapy, remain the mainstay of PCLM treatment, while novel approaches such as immunotherapy have limited effectiveness in PCLM. This study reveals for the first time that pathways related to coronavirus disease 2019, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and ribosome are closely associated with PCLM.

Future research should focus on exploring and enhancing mechanisms such as cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction and ribosome and improve existing mechanisms like cadherin binding and cell adhesion molecules.

To review current evidence regarding the management of de novo, oligometastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa).

A literature search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and a narrative synthesis of the evidence was performed in August 2022.

Oligometastatic disease is an intermediate state between localized and aggressive metastatic PCa defined by ≤ 3-5 metastatic lesions, although this definition remains controversial. Conventional imaging has limited accuracy in detecting metastatic lesions, and the implementation of molecular imaging could pave the way for a more personalized treatment strategy. However, oncological data supporting this strategy are needed. Radiotherapy to the primary tumor should be considered standard treatment for oligometastatic PCa (omPCa). However, it remains to be seen whether local therapy still has an additional survival benefit in patients with de novo omPCa when treated with the most modern systemic therapy combinations. There is insufficient evidence to recommend cytoreductive radical prostatectomy as local therapy; or stereotactic body radiotherapy as metastasis-directed therapy in patients with omPCa. Current data support the use of intensified systemic therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and next-generation hormone therapies (NHT) for patients with de novo omPCa. Docetaxel has not demonstrated benefit in low volume disease. There are insufficient data to support the use of triple therapy (i.e., ADT + NHT + Docetaxel) in low volume disease.

The present review discusses current data in de novo, omPCa regarding its definition, the increasing role of molecular imaging, the place of local and metastasis-directed therapies, and the intensification of systemic therapies.

Visceral metastasis (VM) and a higher number of bone metastasis generally define high volume/risk in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Subgroup analysis of pivotal trials did not show a clear benefit of second-generation non-steroidal anti-androgens (NSAAs) in patients with VM. However, subgroup analysis of the trial assessing abiraterone acetate, a CYP 17 inhibitor, plus prednisone (AAP) showed an improved overall survival (OS) in patients with mCSPC with VM. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and congress abstracts for the phase III randomized controlled trials of second-generation NSAAs and AAP in patients with mCSPC. In this pooled analysis, we included 6485 patients from the 6 phase III trials. The rate of patients with VM was 15.2%. Interestingly, in contrast to NSAAs, AAP seems to be effective in improving OS among patients with VM (hazard ratio, HR: 0.89, 95% CI, 0.72-1.11, P = .30 for second-generation NSAAs; HR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.40-0.84, P = .004 for AAP). In contrast, both second-generation NSAAs (HR: 0.63, 95% CI, 0.57-0.70, P < .001) and AAP (HR: 0.68, 95% CI, 0.57-0.81, P < .001) improved OS in patients without VM. In this pooled analysis, we demonstrate that while AAP provided an OS improvement in patients with VM, second-generation NSAAs did not demonstrate a similar OS benefit in this population.

The treatment paradigm for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has evolved rapidly in the past decade with the approval of several life-prolonging therapies including docetaxel chemotherapy and multiple androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Recently reported phase-three trials have demonstrated a survival benefit of upfront triplet therapy with ADT, docetaxel plus either abiraterone acetate or darolutamide when compared to ADT plus docetaxel alone. However, multiple questions including the incremental benefit of docetaxel to a combination of ADT and ARPI, the timing of ARPI, optimal patient selection for triplet therapy and clinical and genomic biomarkers still remain to be answered. Moreover, real-world data suggest suboptimal treatment intensification with many patients treated with ADT alone highlighting challenges in implementation. In this article, we review the phase-three data associated with triplet therapy in mCSPC. We also discuss the knowledge gaps that exist despite the completion of these studies and how ongoing studies are likely to change the paradigm in the near future. Finally, we provide a simple algorithm based on current data that clinicians can use in daily practice to select patients for appropriate treatment strategies.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and complications are often seen in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and affect their clinical management. Despite acceptable safety profiles and patient compliance, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the mainstay of PCa treatment and chemotherapy, has increased cardiovascular risks and metabolic syndromes in patients. A growing body of evidence also suggests that patients with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions show an increased incidence of PCa and present with fatal forms of the disease. Therefore, it is possible that a molecular link exists between the two diseases, which has not yet been unraveled. This article provides insight into the connection between PCa and CVDs. In this context, we present our findings linking PCa progression with patients' cardiovascular health by performing a comprehensive gene expression study, gene set enrichment (GSEA) and biological pathway analysis using publicly available data extracted from patients with advanced metastatic PCa. We also discuss the common androgen deprivation strategies and CVDs most frequently reported in PCa patients and present evidence from various clinical trials that suggest that therapy induces CVD in PCa patients.

The interim analysis of the ENZAMET trial of testosterone suppression plus either enzalutamide or standard nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy showed an early overall survival benefit with enzalutamide. Here, we report the planned primary overall survival analysis, with the aim of defining the benefit of enzalutamide treatment in different prognostic subgroups (synchronous and metachronous high-volume or low-volume disease) and in those who received concurrent docetaxel.

ENZAMET is an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 83 sites (including clinics, hospitals, and university centres) in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA. Eligible participants were males aged 18 years or older with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate adenocarcinoma evident on CT or bone scanning with ^99mTc and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a centralised web-based system and stratified by volume of disease, planned use of concurrent docetaxel and bone antiresorptive therapy, comorbidities, and study site, to receive testosterone suppression plus oral enzalutamide (160 mg once per day) or a weaker standard oral non-steroidal antiandrogen (bicalutamide, nilutamide, or flutamide; control group) until clinical disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Testosterone suppression was allowed up to 12 weeks before randomisation and for up to 24 months as adjuvant therapy. Concurrent docetaxel (75 mg/m² intravenously) was allowed for up to six cycles once every 3 weeks, at the discretion of participants and physicians. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This planned analysis was triggered by reaching 470 deaths. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02446405, ANZCTR, ACTRN12614000110684, and EudraCT, 2014-003190-42.

Between March 31, 2014, and March 24, 2017, 1125 participants were randomly assigned to receive non-steroidal antiandrogen (n=562; control group) or enzalutamide (n=563). The median age was 69 years (IQR 63-74). This analysis was triggered on Jan 19, 2022, and an updated survival status identified a total of 476 (42%) deaths. After a median follow-up of 68 months (IQR 67-69), the median overall survival was not reached (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·58-0·84]; p<0·0001), with 5-year overall survival of 57% (0·53-0·61) in the control group and 67% (0·63-0·70) in the enzalutamide group. Overall survival benefits with enzalutamide were consistent across predefined prognostic subgroups and planned use of concurrent docetaxel. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia associated with docetaxel use (33 [6%] of 558 in the control group vs 37 [6%] of 563 in the enzalutamide group), fatigue (four [1%] vs 33 [6%]), and hypertension (31 [6%] vs 59 [10%]). The incidence of grade 1-3 memory impairment was 25 (4%) versus 75 (13%). No deaths were attributed to study treatment.

The addition of enzalutamide to standard of care showed sustained improvement in overall survival for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and should be considered as a treatment option for eligible patients.

Astellas Pharma.

The availability of high-fidelity animal models for oncology research has grown enormously in recent years, enabling preclinical studies relevant to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer to be undertaken. This has led to increased opportunities to conduct co-clinical trials, which are studies on patients that are carried out parallel to or sequentially with animal models of cancer that mirror the biology of the patients' tumors. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) are considered to be the models that best represent human disease and have high translational value. Notably, one element of co-clinical trials that still needs significant optimization is quantitative imaging. The National Cancer Institute has organized a Co-Clinical Imaging Resource Program (CIRP) network to establish best practices for co-clinical imaging and to optimize translational quantitative imaging methodologies. This overview describes the ten co-clinical trials of investigators from eleven institutions who are currently supported by the CIRP initiative and are members of the Animal Models and Co-clinical Trials (AMCT) Working Group. Each team describes their corresponding clinical trial, type of cancer targeted, rationale for choice of animal models, therapy, and imaging modalities. The strengths and weaknesses of the co-clinical trial design and the challenges encountered are considered. The rich research resources generated by the members of the AMCT Working Group will benefit the broad research community and improve the quality and translational impact of imaging in co-clinical trials.

There have been a growing number of treatment options available for men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Not only have newer agents entered the clinical landscape, there is a trend toward treatment intensification by combining multiple agents simultaneously. We aim to assess the best contemporary treatment option for men with mCSPC.

We perform an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized control trials that evaluated systemic therapies in men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer. We searched multiple databases up to April 2022. We included all randomized trials assessing the effect of systemic agents. We performed subgroup analyses based on disease volume and timing of presentation. Statistical analysis was performed with Bayesian methods.

We found 10 eligible trials with 10,065 patients who were included in this analysis. Triplet therapy with darolutamide or abiraterone with docetaxel and ADT improved overall survival. In the sensitivity analysis, the respective hazard ratios for triplet therapy was HR 0.70 (95%CI 0.61-0.80) compared to docetaxel+ADT and 0.77 (95%CI 0.65-0.91) compared to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors+ADT combinations. It was estimated that there was 96% chance that one of the triplet therapy combinations were the best treatment option from an OS perspective. Triplet therapy also improved progression-free survival. These benefits were pronounced in men with high-volume disease burden and those with de novo metastatic disease.

The finding suggest that triplet therapy is likely the most efficacious available option in men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, especially in those with high-volume disease burden.

The addition of either docetaxel or an androgen receptor signalling pathway inhibitor (ARSi) to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has become the standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients. Recent phase III data support even greater survival impact of a triplet regimen with ADT plus docetaxel plus an ARSi (abiraterone or darolutamide) compared to ADT plus docetaxel.

To evaluate whether the addition of an ARSi to ADT improves outcomes of mCSPC patients treated with docetaxel.

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) testing the combination of ARSi + ADT in mCSPC men who received docetaxel. Data extraction was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Summary hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. The statistical analyses were performed with RevMan software (v.5.2.3).

Five RCTs were selected. Triplet therapy improved overall survival (OS) compared to ADT + docetaxel in mCSPC patients (HR = 0.73; p < 0.00001). This intensified strategy maintained the OS benefit when the ARSi was administered concomitant to chemotherapy (HR = 0.72; p < 0.00001), but no statistical effect was detected if the ARSi was sequential to docetaxel (p = 0.44). Moreover, in the subgroup of men with de novo mCSPC, triplets significantly improved OS (HR = 0.72, p < 0.0001). The lack of access to raw data was the main limit of our analysis.

Our results support a clear survival advantage of adding an ARSi to ADT in mCSPC patients treated with docetaxel, mainly when the ARSi was administered concomitantly to chemotherapy and in the subgroup of de novo mCSPC.

In the last decade, there have been substantial improvements in the outcome of the management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) following the development of several novel agents as well as by combining several therapeutic strategies. Although the overall survival (OS) of mHSPC is shown to improve with intense androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), combined with docetaxel, as well as other novel hormonal therapy agents, or alongside local intervention to the primary neoplasm. Notably, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonists are known to cause fewer cardiovascular side effects compared with LHRH agonists. Thus, in this mini review, we explore the different approaches in the management of mHSPC, with the aim that we may provide useful information for both basic scientists and clinicians when managing relevant clinical situations.