Perioperative FLOT (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) triplet chemotherapy is the standard of care for localised and resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We aimed to compare a modified FLOT regimen (also known as TFOX) with FOLFOX as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

PRODIGE 51-FFCD-GASTFOX is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial conducted at 96 medical centres in France. Eligible individuals were aged 18 years or older, had histologically confirmed, HER2-negative adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction that was locally advanced unresectable or metastatic and previously untreated, measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using the minimisation method, to receive FOLFOX (folinic acid 400 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a continuous 46 h infusion every 2 weeks) or TFOX (docetaxel 50 mg/m2, folinic acid 400 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 then 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a continuous 46 h infusion every 2 weeks). Randomisation was stratified by centre, ECOG performance status, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, tumour stage, tumour location, and pathological histological subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (assessed in the intention-to-treat population), defined as time from randomisation to the first radiological or clinical progression (or both), or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (defined as time from randomisation to death due to any cause) and objective response rate (defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall complete or partial response). Hazard ratio and 95% CIs were estimated using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model. When the proportional hazards assumption was violated, the restricted mean survival time was used to estimate the treatment effect size. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03006432, and EudraCT, 2016-002331-16.

Between Dec 19, 2016, and Dec 26, 2022, 507 patients were randomly assigned (254 to the TFOX group and 253 to the FOLFOX group [intention-to-treat population]). The median age was 64·2 years (IQR 56·7-70·8), and 399 (79%) participants were male and 108 (21%) were female. At median follow-up of 42·8 months (25·8-49·9), the median progression-free survival was 7·59 months (95% CI 7·06-7·95) in the TFOX group versus 5·98 months (5·65-6·97) in the FOLFOX group. The assumption of proportional hazards was violated (p=0·013); therefore, the 12-month restricted mean progression-free survival was calculated: 7·52 months (7·06-7·97) in the TFOX group versus 6·62 months (6·16-7·09) in the FOLFOX group (p=0·0072). The median overall survival was 15·08 months (13·70-16·72) in the TFOX group versus 12·65 months (10·94-14·00) in the FOLFOX group (proportional hazards assumption was confirmed; HR 0·82 [0·68-0·99]; p=0·048) and the objective response rate was 62·3% (56·0-68·3) versus 53·4% (47·0-59·8; p=0·045). The most common grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea (37 [15%] in the TFOX group vs 18 [7%] in the FOLFOX group), peripheral neuropathy (80 [32%] vs 49 [20%]), neutropenia (67 [27%] vs 44 [18%]), and fatigue (40 [16%] vs 20 [8%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66 (27%) participants in the TFOX group and 33 (13%) in the FOLFOX group. There were two (<1%) treatment-related deaths in the TFOX group (one due to septic shock and one due to gastrointestinal perforation) and one (<1%) in the FOLFOX group (due to septic shock).

The modified FLOT/TFOX regimen significantly improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with FOLFOX in previously untreated patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The modified FLOT/TFOX regimen might represent a new first-line treatment option for patients eligible for this docetaxel triplet chemotherapy.

Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive.

The efficacy of several novel combinations of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand antibodies with chemotherapy, which have become the new standard first-line combination therapy with favorable outcomes, was still not certain in patients with different combined positive score (CPS) grades. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy at different CPS grades, compared with chemotherapy.

Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve reconstruction was employed to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with gastric cancer. The graphical reconstruction algorithm was used to estimate the time-to-event outcomes from Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall cohort or reported subgroups (depending on CPS). KMSubtraction was used to derive the unreported survival data by matching participants in the overall cohort and known subgroups.

This analysis included 5072 patients in 5 trials (CheckMate 649, KEYNOTE-859, ORIENT-16, KEYNOTE-062, and JAVELIN Gastric 100). Immunochemotherapy exhibited more effectiveness than chemotherapy in most cases. For the overall cohort, sintilimab + chemotherapy exhibited the best effect in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76). Nivolumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84), sintilimab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65), and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81) exhibited favorable outcomes in OS in patients with a CPS ≥1, 5, and 10, respectively, and similarly in PFS. Avelumab + chemotherapy performed similarly to chemotherapy in OS but had poor PFS in the reported subgroup.

Finding suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy could enrich patients with benefits regardless of CPS grades, though subtle efficacy in low CPS subgroups. This study compared the efficacy of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer, but we acknowledge some differences between reconstructed and original data. Hopefully there will be more research investigating comparisons between current therapies rather than with chemotherapy only in the future.

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

The current guidelines for the treatment of esophageal cancer recommend a multimodal approach that includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Despite advances in treatment, rates of treatment failure, pathologic incomplete response, tumor metastasis, and death remain unacceptably high.

This study was a narrative literature review using the terms "resectable esophageal cancer" and "multimodal therapy" to identify prospective trials of neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, individually or combined with surgery, for esophageal cancer. Trials performed between 1984 and 2022 were identified and analyzed.

gov was queried to identify ongoing studies.

Twenty-one clinical studies were identified: 15 randomized controlled trials and 6 prospective nonrandomized trials. The results of the randomized trials suggest that multimodal therapy-in the form of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with radiation or chemotherapy alone, followed by surgery-is associated with better rates of local disease control and partial clinical response and, potentially, longer survival than is surgery alone. Immunotherapy is an emerging option for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

The treatment of patients with resectable esophageal cancer is rapidly evolving. Although previous treatment options have had only limited benefits for patients, significant progress has been made during last 3 decades. The results of the available studies suggest that advances in the treatment of esophageal cancer have the potential to improve survival in these patients; however, questions remain regarding mechanisms of action, patient selection, and the use of personalized approaches that are based on genetics.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) nanogels have attracted widespread attention, aiming to improve cancer treatment paradigms and overcome the limitations of free-form drugs. However highly hydrophilic nature of HA nanogels limits their potential application where amphiphilic interactions are required for the delivery of hydrophobic drugs. In this study, we developed amphiphilic structure oxaliplatin (OXA) loaded oligo-hyaluronic acid (oHA)-PEG-Octane nanogel using stable disulfide bonds with ultrasonic re-emulsion method. 1,8-Mercaptooctane present in the organic phase underwent crosslinking with sulfhydryl groups conjugated on oHA and PEG in the inner aqueous phase through interfacial reactions, resulting in the formation of an amphiphilic structure of the nanogels. The nanogels demonstrated uniform size, stability, excellent biocompatibility, and achieved a high drug-loading capacity of 10.8 %. OXA NGs targeted tumor cells through CD44-mediated endocytosis, disassembled under the influence of high glutathione (GSH) levels within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and released OXA inside the reductive cytosol to trigger immunogenic cell death (ICD) of tumor cells. In vivo experiments showed OXA NGs could inhibit tumor growth. Furthermore, the amphiphilic hyaluronic acid nanohydrogel may have clinical potential due to its ability to accommodate various therapeutic agents; therefore, OXA NGs are a potential candidate for clinical translation.

mGEC is associated with poor overall survival (OS) of approximately 4-10 months. CtDNA is emerging as a promising prognostic biomarker with high potential for early relapse detection. However, until now, there was little knowledge on serial ctDNA detection and its impact on early treatment evaluation and prognosis in mGEC.

ctDNA detection (ddPCR) was carried out serially in 37 matched tissue (NGS) patients with mGEC prior to systemic treatment initiation and every two weeks thereafter until restaging (n = 173 samples). The results have been correlated with response to treatment (restaging CT), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

The pretherapeutic detection rate was 77.8%. Response to treatment assessment was correct in 54.2% (pretherapeutically pos./neg.) and 85.7% (dynamics at week 4). Moreover, a decline in ctDNA (MAF in %) below 57.1% of the pretherapeutic value after 2 weeks of systemic treatment was accompanied by a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 90% (AUC = 0.73) for correct restaging assessment (response evaluation by CT after 3 months) evaluating 76.5% of patients correctly after only 2 weeks. In contrast to mere pretherapeutic ctDNA positivity (p = 0.445), a decline in ctDNA dynamics to under 57.1% of its initial value was significantly associated with OS (4.1 (95% Cl 2.1-6.1) vs. 13.6 (95% CI 10.4-16.6) months, p < 0.001) and PFS (3.2 (1.9-4.5) vs. 9.5 (95% CI 5.5-13.5) months, p = 0.001) after two weeks of treatment. Additionally, the change in detectability from positive pretherapeutic levels to negative during treatment was associated with similar survival as for patients who were always regarded as ctDNA-negative (9.5 (95%Cl 0.4-18.5) vs. 9.6 (95%Cl 1.3-17.9)). The absence of becoming undetectable was associated with worse survival (4.7 months).

ctDNA is a promising additional biomarker allowing for early evaluation of response to treatment and saving unevaluated treatment time for patients with mGEC, and could allow for an early change in treatment with anticipated prognostic benefit in the future.

The incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma (GEC) in elderly patients is increasing, yet patients ≥75 years have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to investigate palliative chemotherapy administration patterns and survival outcomes in older adults.

A retrospective analysis identified patients aged 65-74 (young-old) and ≥75 years (older-old) diagnosed with advanced GEC. Patient and tumor characteristics were recorded, with descriptive analysis, time-to-event data analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis performed.

One hundred and ninety-eight "young-old" and 109 'older-old' patients were identified. Patient characteristics were similar between groups except for Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI), with lower co-morbidities in the "young-old" compared to "older-old" cohort (P < .001; CCI = 0 in 103 (52%) "young-old" vs 31 (28%) "older-old"). The primary diagnosis in both groups was adenocarcinoma. 119 (60%) "young-old" and 25 (23%) "older-old" patients received chemotherapy (P < .001). Performance status was the primary explanation for chemotherapy non-receipt in both cohorts; age was the explanation in 21 (25%) "older-old" patients and none in the "young-old" patients. PFS for first-line systemic therapy in "young-old" patients was 6.4 (95% CI 5.9-7.6) versus 7.5 months (95% CI 5.1-11.3) in "older-old" patients (P = .69) whilst respective OS was 12.3 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) and 10.4 months (95% CI 9.0-14.6) (P = .0816). Toxicity prompted chemotherapy cessation in 17 (15%) "young-old" and 3 (13%) "older-old" patients (P = .97). Multivariate analysis identified CCI and ECOG performance status as predictive for PFS and OS, respectively. No causative relationship was identified with other variables.

Our study of real-world older-adults show that significant number of "older-old" patients with GEC do not receive chemotherapy. Among "older-old" adults who do receive systemic therapy, outcomes are comparable; this underscores the importance of geriatric assessment-guided care and suggests that age alone should not be a barrier to receipt of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEC.

Older patients with gastroesophageal (GE) cancer are at increased risk of low treatment tolerability and poor outcome. Dose reduced chemotherapy has been shown to improve tolerability without compromising efficacy in advanced GE cancer. However, the impact of reduced dose preoperative chemotherapy in the curative setting of older patients is unknown. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if dose reduction during preoperative chemotherapy impacts survival in older patients aged≥70 years with resectable GE cancer.

This cohort study included consecutive patients referred to perioperative chemotherapy treated from November 2016 until October 2021. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test was used to compare survival rates. A multivariate analysis was made to control for potentially interacting covariates.

A total of 548 patients (age ≥ 70, 179; age < 70, 369) were included. Fewer older compared to younger patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 at baseline (50 % vs 63 %, p = 0.007). Preoperative chemotherapy was more often initiated at reduced dose in older patients compared to younger (37 % vs 14 %, p < 0.001). Older patients who did not receive a reduce dose in the second or subsequent cycles of preoperative chemotherapy were less likely to complete preoperative chemotherapy when compared to the younger patients (75 % vs 85 %, p = 0.03). Dose reduction in the second or subsequent preoperative chemotherapy cycles was associated with significantly better OS for the older patient population (HR = 0.54, 95 % CI: 1.2-2.9, p = 0.006) but not for the younger (HR = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.75-1.4, p = 0.83). Dose reduction in the second or subsequent preoperative chemotherapy cycles was associated with lower mortality risk in the multivariate analysis for the older patients (HR = 0.56, 95 % CI: 0.33-0.97, p = 0.04).

Dose reduction in the second or subsequent preoperative chemotherapy cycles seems safe and feasible in older patients without compromising survival and may result in a benefit in OS. This finding should be validated in an independent cohort or a randomized trial.

Although esogastric cancers often affect patients over 75, there are no specific age-related guidelines for the care of these patients. Esogastric cancers have a poor prognosis and require multimodal treatment to obtain a cure. The morbidity and mortality of these multimodal treatments can be limited if care is optimized by selecting patients for neoadjuvant treatment and surgery. This can include a geriatric assessment, prehabilitation, renutrition, and more extensive use of minimally invasive surgery. Denutrition is frequent in these patients and is particularly harmful in older patients. While older patients may be provided with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, it must be adapted to the patient's status. A reduction in the initial dose of palliative chemotherapy should be considered in patients with metastases. These patients tolerate immunotherapy better than systemic chemotherapy, and a strategy to replace chemotherapy with immunotherapy whenever possible should be evaluated. Finally, better supportive care is needed in patients with a poor performance status. Prospective studies are needed to improve the care and prognosis of elderly patients.

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequent and deadly tumours worldwide. However, the evidence that currently exists for the treatment of older adults is limited and is derived mainly from clinical trials in which older patients are poorly represented. In this article, a group of experts selected from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD), and the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) reviews the existing scientific evidence for older patients (≥65 years old) with gastric cancer and establishes a series of recommendations that allow optimization of management during all phases of the disease. Geriatric assessment (GA) and a multidisciplinary approach should be fundamental parts of the process. In early stages, endoscopic submucosal resection or laparoscopic gastrectomy is recommended depending on the stage. In locally advanced stage, the tolerability of triplet regimens has been established; however, as in the metastatic stage, platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based regimens with the possibility of lower dose intensity are recommended resulting in similar efficacy. Likewise, the administration of trastuzumab, ramucirumab and immunotherapy for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced disease is safe. Supportive treatment acquires special importance in a population with different life expectancies than at a younger age. It is essential to consider the general state of the patient and the psychosocial dimension.

In CheckMate 649, first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy prolonged overall survival versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic non-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We present exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

In patients (N = 1,581) concurrently randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy and in those with tumor PD-L1 expression at a combined positive score (CPS) of ≥5, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the EQ-5D and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric (FACT-Ga), which included the FACT-General (FACT-G) and Gastric Cancer subscale (GaCS). The FACT-G GP5 item assessed treatment-related symptom burden. Longitudinal changes in HRQoL were assessed using mixed models for repeated measures in the PRO analysis population (randomly assigned patients with baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessments). Time to symptom or definitive deterioration analyses were also conducted.

In the PRO analysis population (n = 1,360), PRO questionnaire completion rates were mostly >80% during treatment. Patient-reported symptom burden was not increased with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy. Mean improved changes from baseline were greater with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for FACT-Ga total, GaCS, and EQ-5D visual analog scale in patients with a CPS of ≥5; results were similar for the overall PRO analysis population. In CPS ≥5 and all randomly assigned populations, nivolumab plus chemotherapy reduced the risk of symptom deterioration versus chemotherapy, on the basis of FACT-Ga total score and GaCS; time to definitive deterioration was longer, and the risk of definitive deterioration in HRQoL was reduced with nivolumab plus chemotherapy across EQ-5D and most FACT-Ga measures (hazard ratio [95% CI] <1).

Compared with chemotherapy alone, first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy showed stable or better on-treatment HRQoL in patients with advanced/metastatic non-HER2-positive GC/GEJC/EAC and also showed decreased risk of definitive HRQoL deterioration.

Surgical resection is currently the best curative approach for gastric cancer (GC); however, the prognosis of patients with advanced GC remains poor even with curative resection. For this reason, perioperative chemotherapy has been combined with surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative recurrence. Standard perioperative chemotherapy for resectable advanced GC varies from region to region. Postoperative S-1 therapy was standardized via the ACTS-GC study in East Asia, perioperative ECF (Epirubicin + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil) was standardized via the MAGIC study in Europe, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy was standardized via the US intergroup study in North America. Since then, more intensive regimens have been developed. In recent years, perioperative therapy using novel agents, such as molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has also been tested and evaluated in the three major regions (East Asia, Europe, and North America) with promising results. Perioperative chemotherapy has become an integral part of many treatment strategies and requires continued research and evaluation.

Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) presents a substantial global health challenge as the number of cases continues to rise. The current standard approach for treating localized EGA involves a combination of triplet chemotherapy, which consists of a platinum compound, a fluoropyrimidine, and a taxane (known as FLOT), followed by surgery. In cases of metastatic EGA with HER2-positive status or in certain studies with localized EGA, the use of HER2-targeted antibodies such as trastuzumab has shown improved responses. Recently, the addition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, when combined with 5-FU, platinum-based chemotherapy, and trastuzumab, has demonstrated significant enhancements in response rates for HER2-positive metastatic EGA. However, there is currently insufficient evidence regarding this treatment approach in localized HER2-positive disease.

The PHERFLOT study is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, exploratory phase II trial designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of perioperative pembrolizumab, FLOT, and trastuzumab in patients with previously untreated localized HER2-positive EGA. In total, 30 patients will be recruited. The co-primary end points are pathological complete response rate and disease-free survival rate after 2 years. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability, efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and objective response rate and translational markers, such as blood-based signatures (e.g., immune repertoire changes or emergence of anti-HER2 resistance variants) or microbiota signatures that may correlate with immune activation and therapy response.

Recent evidence from phase II clinical trials demonstrated improved efficacy through the addition of trastuzumab to perioperative FLOT. Furthermore, in advanced or metastatic EGA, the combination of trastuzumab, FLOT, and the PD1-inhibitor pembrolizumab significantly improved treatment response. The PHERFLOT study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach in HER2-positive-localized EGA, potentially identifying a promising new perioperative regimen for localized EGA, which then needs to be confirmed within a randomized trial. Furthermore, the accompanying translational program of the study might help to improve the stratification of suitable patients and to identify potential translational targets for future clinical trials.

https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05504720.

Platinum-fluoropyrimidine combinations are standard of care for treatment of metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy is unknown, however, and maintenance strategies have not yet been established.

MATEO is an international randomized phase II trial exploring efficacy and safety of S-1 maintenance therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. After 3 months of first-line platinum-fluoropyrimidine-based induction therapy, patients without progression were randomized in a 2 : 1 allocation to receive S-1 monotherapy (arm A) or to continue combination chemotherapy (arm B). The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of overall survival in the S-1 maintenance group. Progression-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life were secondary endpoints.

From 2014 to 2019, 110 and 55 patients were randomized in arm A and arm B, respectively (recruitment closed prematurely). Median overall survival from randomization was 13.4 months for arm A and 11.4 months for arm B [hazard ratio 0.97 (80% confidence interval 0.76-1.23), P = 0.86]. Median progression-free survival from randomization was 4.3 and 6.1 months for arm A versus arm B, respectively [hazard ratio 1.10 (80% confidence interval 0.86-1.39), P = 0.62]. Patients in arm A had numerically fewer treatment-related adverse events (84.9% versus 93.9%) and significantly less peripheral sensory polyneuropathy ≥grade 2 (9.4% versus 36.7%).

S-1 maintenance following platinum-based induction therapy leads to non-inferior survival outcomes compared with the continuation of platinum-based combination. Toxicity patterns favor a fluoropyrimidine maintenance strategy. These data challenge the continued use of platinum combination chemotherapy after response to 3 months induction therapy in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Our study aimed to estimate the epidemiological trends of gastric cancer in the United States from 1992 to 2019. This population-based study used the US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-12 database as a fundamental cohort to analyze gastric cancer incidence, incidence-based mortality (IBM), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) probabilities from 1992 to 2019. The Global Burden of Disease study (1990-2018) was used as a likely validation cohort. Age-period-cohort analyses were performed to explore the underlying causes of trend changes. We found that the incidence rate of gastric cancer decreased from 1992 to 2019. IBM also decreased significantly from 1997 to 2019. The 3-year OS and CSS of gastric cancer increased from 22.3% to 28.7% and 25.7% to 33.5%, respectively. However, the proportion of distant gastric cancer cases had unexpectedly increased rapidly from 33.1% in 1992 to 44.7% in 2019. Age-period-cohort modeling found that the incidence and IBM rates remained stable in the groups aged below 50 years, while that in all age groups older than 50 years showed a significant downward trend. High incidence and mortality risks were observed in the younger birth cohorts (birth year after 1990). To conclude, we observed a decline in incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in the United States in the past decades. We determined that progression of primary and tertiary preventive measures is the main reason for the reduction in the disease burden of gastric cancer. However, secondary preventive measures for gastric cancer still need to be strengthened.

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to perioperative chemotherapy in operable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer has become one of the research hotspots, while reliable biomarkers for efficacy are lacking. We conducted a phase 1 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of LP002, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, plus chemotherapy as perioperative treatment in patients with gastric or GEJ cancer.

We enrolled patients with resectable and PD-L1 positive gastric or GEJ cancers. Eligible patients received three preoperative and six postoperative cycles of intravenous LP002 with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included rate of margin-free (R0) resection and pathological complete response (pCR). We also characterized changes in the tumor immune microenvironment using multiplex immunofluorescence (MIF) staining and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with pre- and post-treatment tumor samples.

Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 28 had GEJ cancer. With a median follow-up of 7.9 months, all patients completed preoperative treatment, and 27 patients underwent surgery. Twenty-four patients underwent R0 resection. Six patients (20.0%) had Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) 1-3, including one achieving pCR. Twenty-seven patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), while grade 3-4 TRAEs were observed in 11 patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. MIF staining revealed that TRG 1-3 group was associated with a higher density of PD-L1+/CD68+ cells in the pre-treatment tumor parenchyma than TRG 4-5 group (p = 0.048). NGS studies with paired pre- and post-treatment tumor samples revealed the disappearance of pre-existing mutations, the emergence of new mutations, and variations in the abundance of mutations after preoperative LP002 and chemotherapy. Meanwhile, tumor mutational burden decreased in patients with TRG 1-3 (p = 0.0313).

LP002 plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil are safe in patients with gastric or GEJ cancer, and patient selection via appropriate biomarkers is needed in the future.

According to the results of FLOT4 trial, perioperative FLOT chemotherapy improved overall survival (OS) in locally advanced, resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) compared to perioperative ECF/ECX. We report real-life data 10 years after introduction of perioperative FLOT at our institution.

Survival of 356 consecutive EGA patients (cT3/4 and/or cN + and/or cM1) who underwent curative surgical resection was retrospectively analysed from a prospective database. A total of 263 patients received preoperative chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol and 93 patients received an epirubicin/platinum/5FU-based regimen (EPF). Propensity score matching (PSM) according to pretretment characteristics was performed to compensate for heterogeneity between groups.

Median OS did not differ between groups (FLOT/EPF 52.1/46.4 months, p = 0.577). After PSM, survival was non-significantly improved after FLOT compared to EPF (median OS not reached/46.4 months, p = 0.156). Perioperative morbidity and mortality did not differ between groups. Histopathologic response rate was 35% after FLOT and 26% after EPF (p = 0.169). R0 resection could be achieved more frequently after FLOT than after EPF (93%/79%, p = 0.023).

Overall survival after perioperative FLOT followed by surgery is comparable to clinical trials. However, collective real-life application of FLOT failed to provide a significant survival benefit compared to EPF. In clinical reality, patient selection is triggered by age, comorbidity, tumor localization, and clinical tumor stage. Yet matched analyses support FLOT4 trial findings.

Gastric cancer (GC) is recognized as one of the most common deadly malignancies worldwide and about 40-50% of patients present at diagnosis with an unresectable disease due to a locally advanced or already metastatic condition. Recently, therapeutic options for management of metastatic GC (mGC) have been approved allowing a potential improvement of patient cancer treatment response and also an establishment of a continuum of care for this aggressive disease. This report is the result of a literature review by an expert panel. The aim of this document is to provide evidence, wherever it is lacking, to provide expert opinion directed at strategic management of mGC, and in particular aspect at practical management where appropriate guidelines are not available. Treatment landscape with new therapeutic strategies for third line and beyond, role of imaging, prognostic factors, symptoms, and markers as well as the importance of multidisciplinary approach particularly the nutritional aspects are discussed.

Recent therapeutic advances have prolonged survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, though the prognosis for patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer remains poor. Long-term survival after resection of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma is dependent on early eradication of micrometastatic disease and optimal surgical resection. Preoperative therapy with a docetaxel-containing three-drug regimen has recently been shown to be superior to an anthracycline-containing three-drug regimen or two-drug therapy with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum. Chemoradiation is not essential and is reserved for patients with suboptimal resection. Emerging research strategies include introduction of pre- and postoperative checkpoint blockade and biomarker-directed therapy.

Fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) regimen has shown strong efficacy as perioperative therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric (GC) and gastroesophageal (AEG) carcinoma. In the palliative situation, FLOT is recommended only for young fit patients. Data of efficacy and tolerability of FLOT in elderly patients are scarce and controversial. Thus, this study aimed to provide real-life experience of elderly patients with GC and AEG treated with FLOT as first-line palliative chemotherapy.

Patients with advanced or metastatic GC or AEG and treated with FLOT as first-line palliative therapy between 2010 and 2021 were analyzed. Patients were grouped into < 65 years old (n = 35) and ≥ 65 years old (n = 22) groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), feasibility and toxicity were analyzed.

The median OS was 10.4 months with no significant difference between both groups (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.48, 1.57; p = 0.632). The ECOG performance status showed powerful influence on OS in the subgroup analysis with median OS of 12.3 months for ECOG = 0 compared to 5.0 months for ECOG ≥ 1 (p = 0.015) as well as in multivariate analysis (HR 2.62; 95% CI 1.36, 5.04; p = 0.004).

In the present study the ECOG performance status showed a stronger prognostic value than patient age in FLOT as first- line therapy in a real-life cohort with advanced and metastatic GC and AEG. The performance status should therefore be considered in the therapeutic decision making of elderly patients with GC and AEG.

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) is a devastating disease and is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. This heterogeneous disease has several different classification systems that consider histological appearance and genomic alterations. Understanding the etiology of GC, including infection, hereditary conditions, and environmental factors, is of particular importance and is discussed in this review. To improve survival in GC, we also must improve our therapeutic strategies. Here, we discuss new targets that warrant further exploration.

Gastric cancer is one of the commonest malignancies with high rates of mortality worldwide. Older patients represent a substantial proportion of cases with this diagnosis. However, there are very few 'elderly-specific' trials in this setting. In addition, the inclusion rate of such patients in randomised clinical trials is poor, presumably due to concerns about increased toxicity, co-existing comorbidities and impaired performance status. Therapeutic strategies for this patient group are therefore mostly based on retrospective subgroup analysis of randomised clinical trials. Review of currently available evidence suggests that older gastric cancer patients who are fit for trial inclusion may benefit from surgical intervention and peri-operative systemic chemotherapy strategies. For patients with metastatic disease, management has been revolutionized by the use of anti-HER2 directed therapies as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy. Early data suggest that fit older patients may also benefit from these therapeutic interventions. However, once again there may be limitations in extrapolating these data to everyday clinical practice with older patients being less likely to have a good performance status and an intact immune system. Therefore, determining the functional age and not just the chronological age of a patient prior to initiating therapy becomes very important. The functional decline including reduced organ function that may occur in older patients makes the integration of some form of geriatric assessment in routine clinical practice very relevant.

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is a disease of older adults with very poor survival rates. Its incidence has risen dramatically across the world in recent decades. Current treatment approaches for older adults are based largely on extrapolated evidence from clinical trials conducted in younger and fitter participants than those more commonly encountered in clinical practice. Understanding how to apply available evidence to our patients in the clinic setting is essential given the high morbidity of both curative and palliative treatment. This review aims to use available data to inform the management of an older adult with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common and lethal carcinoma; however, the effectiveness and feasibility of the chemo- and radio-therapy (CRT) for the elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with surgery have not been fully discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential effect of CRT on the prognosis.

A total of 1085 patients (534 CRT patients vs. 551 non-CRT patients) from 1998 to 2016 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Using the competing risk regression and survival analysis, an overall estimation of the effectiveness of CRT was performed on a well-balanced cohort via performing propensity score matching. Then, the specific impact of CRT on high- (n = 557) and low-risk (n = 528) cohorts derived from the nomogram's risk quantification for every patient were further evaluated respectively. Additionally, the advantages of the nomogram model and the conventional tumor, node, metastasis (TNM, 6th revision) staging system were compared.

A better survival outcome was observed among patients receiving both surgery and CRT than those who underwent surgery alone (HR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.68, P < 0.001), especially for those with tumors characterized by poor differentiation, large tumor size, advanced T staging, lymphatic metastasis, and distant metastasis (HR: 0.48, 95% CI 0.39-0.59, P < 0.001), while no benefit was observed among the low-risk patients. Furthermore, the newly established nomogram model might be better than the TNM (6th revision) staging system but more data needed.

Aggressive treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, were considered effective for selected elderly patients with EC according to the newly established nomogram model.

Gastric (G) and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas are of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide and affect mainly patients over 70 years at diagnosis. Older age has been associated in gastric cancers with distal tumour location, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability and is not identified itself as an independent prognostic factor. As immune checkpoint inhibitors recently changed the landmark of advanced G and GEJ adenocarcinomas treatment, we decided to perform a literature review to define the evidence-level of clinical data in older patients. This work underlined the lasting low -inclusion rate of older patients and -implementation rate of frailty screening tools in clinical trials in G/GEJ carcinomas. In the first-line metastatic setting, two prospective randomized phase III studies have specifically assessed the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients with HER2-negative gastric cancers, demonstrating the feasibility of reduced dose oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in this population. Only few data are available in HER2-positive tumors, or in the second-line setting. Furthermore, no specific trial with immune checkpoint inhibitors was performed in older frail patients whereas their benefit/adverse events ratio make them attractive candidates in this patient's population. We conclude that older fit patients can be treated in the same way as younger ones and included in clinical trials. Improving the outcome of older frail patients should be the oncology community next focus by implementing targeted interventions before initiating cancer therapy and designing specific clinical trials. Frailty screening tools and geriatric data collection have to be implemented in routine-practice and clinical trials.

The main reason for treatment failure after curative surgical resection of gastric cancer is intra-abdominal spread, with 40-50% peritoneal seeding as primary localization of recurrence. Peritoneal relapse is seen in 60-70% of tumors of diffuse type, compared to only 20-30% of intestinal type. Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is an increasingly used therapy method for patients with peritoneal metastases. The preventive use of HIPEC could represent an elegant approach for patients (pts) before macroscopic peritoneal seeding, since pts. with operable disease are fit and may have potential risk of microscopic involvement, thus having a theoretical chance of cure with HIPEC even without the need for cytoreduction. No results from a PCRT from the Western hemisphere have yet been published.

This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study including a total of 200 pts. with localized and locally advanced diffuse or mixed type (Laurens's classification) adenocarcinoma of the stomach and Type II/III GEJ. All enrolled pts. will have received 3-6 pre-operative cycles of biweekly FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m2; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; Leucovorin 200 mg/m2; 5-FU 2600 mg/m2, q2wk). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive surgery only and postoperative FLOT (control arm) or surgery + intraoperative HIPEC (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 solution administered at a temperature of 42 °C for 90 min) and postoperative FLOT (experimental arm). Surgery is carried out as gastrectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy. Primary endpoint is PFS/DFS, major secondary endpoints are OS, rate of pts. with peritoneal relapse at 2 and 3 years, perioperative morbidity/mortality and quality of life. The trial starts with a safety run-in phase. After 20 pts. had curatively intended resection in Arm B, an interim safety analysis is performed. Recruitment has already started and first patient in was on January 18th, 2021.

If the PREVENT concept proves to be effective, this could potentially lead to a new standard of therapy. On the contrary, if the outcome is negative, pts. with gastric cancer and no peritoneal involvement will not be treated with HIPEC during surgery.

The study is registered on June 25th, 2020 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04447352 ; EudraCT: 2017-003832-35 .

The FLOT4-AIO trial established the FLOT regimen (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel) as a compelling option for gastric, junctional and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data on FLOT with en-bloc transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) are limited. This study explored operative complications, tolerance, toxicity, physiological impact, and oncologic outcomes.

An observational cohort study on consecutive patients at 3 tertiary centers undergoing FLOT and TTE. Toxicity, operative complications (per ECCG definitions), tumor regression grade (TRG), recurrences and survival were documented, as well as pre- and post FLOT assessment of sarcopenia and pulmonary physiology.

175 patients (cT2-4a, Nany) commenced treatment, 84% male, median age 65, 94% cT3/T4a, 73% cN+. 89% completed 4 preoperative cycles, and 35% all cycles. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (12%), diarrhoea (13%), and infection (15%). Sarcopenia increased from 18% to 37% (p = 0.020), and diffusion capacity (DLCO) decreased by 8% (-34%+25%; p < 0.010). On pathology, ypT3/4 was 59%, and ypN+54%, with 10% TRG 1, 14% TRG 2, and 76% TRG3-5, and R0 95%. 161 underwent TTE, with an in-hospital mortality of 0.6%, 24%-pneumonia, 11%-anastomotic leak, and Clavien Dindo ≥III in 27%. At a median follow up of 12 months (1-85), 33 relapsed, 8 (5%) locally, and 3yr survival was 60%.

FLOT and en bloc TTE was safe, with no discernible impact on operative complications, with 24% having a major pathologic response. Caveats include a limited pathologic response in the majority, and negative impact on muscle mass and lung physiology, and low use of adjuvant cycles. These data may provide a real-world benchmark for this complex care pathway.

Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Several treatment possibilities have been investigated, but only a few show clinically meaningful results.

Systemic treatment options for advanced gastric cancer (aGC) have evolved over the recent years, implementing the growing molecular knowledge of this heterogeneous disease. Molecular profiling (at least for HER-2-expression, microsatellite instability status, Epstein-Barr virus expression, and programmed death ligand-1 expression/combined positive score [CPS]) is recommended for all therapy-fit patients prior to the start of a systemic treatment and is crucial for decisions on treatment strategy and drug selection. Various examples like the application of trastuzumab in the HER-2-positive subgroup underline the benefits of this approach starting from the first-line setting. A combination of platinum and fluoropyrimidine remains the first-line chemotherapy backbone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Triplet combinations adding taxanes to the doublet regimen are reserved for certain scenarios. Unfortunately, almost all patients who receive first-line treatment (with or without anti-HER-2 blockade) progress and <70% are eligible for a second-line therapy. The addition of monoclonal antibodies has substantially improved outcomes in this setting. As such, ramucirumab has led to significant and clinically meaningful advancements in the second-line treatment. Furthermore, immuno-oncology with checkpoint inhibition and immune stimulation has evolved in the field of aGC. Recent first-line data show a significant survival benefit in aGC patients with a CPS ≥ 5 under immunochemotherapy. Nonetheless, the impact of immunotherapy combinations and immunochemotherapy remains an area of investigation. Key Message: In this review, we highlight recent improvements in the treatment landscape of advanced gastric cancer, the heterogeneity of this disease, and possible personalized targets.

No preferred first-line chemotherapy regimen exists for advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Addition of docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been shown to improve survival but is associated with increased toxicity. In this randomized, non-comparative phase 2 trial, we tested carboplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine (CTX), a potentially useful modification of DCF (NCT02177552).

Patients with advanced HER2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma not previously treated in the first-line setting were randomized to intravenous docetaxel 60 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC5 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m² bd days 1-14, q4w (CTX) or intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m² and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 625 mg/m² bd days 1-21, q3w (epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine [EOX]). Treatment continued until progression, intolerance or for a maximum of nine cycles. The primary endpoint was 1-year survival for patients treated with CTX.

Between June 2014 and January 2019, a total of 98 eligible patients were randomized. The 1-year survival rate was 34.7% (95% CI 21.8 - 47.9) with CTX and 36.7% (95% CI 23.6 - 50.0) with EOX. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months (95% CI 5.5 - 7.1) and 9.8 months (95% CI 8.2 - 11.0) with CTX and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.3 - 7.0) and 10.2 months (95% CI 8.0 - 11.9) with EOX, respectively. Related grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 86% of patients on CTX and 69% on EOX. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 31.4% of patients on CTX and 13.7% on EOX.

First-line CTX showed insufficient efficacy and caused a high rate of febrile neutropenia. CTX could not, therefore, be recommended for further study. This trial adds to current knowledge of docetaxel combined with platinum and 5-FU: that the combination is associated with increased toxicity and its use should be limited to fit patients in need of a response.

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GOA) is a disease of older people. Incidence is rising in the developed world and the majority of patients present with advanced disease. Based on clinical trial data, systemic chemotherapy in the advanced setting is associated with improvements in quality of life and survival. However, there is a recognised mismatch between trial populations and the patients encountered in clinical practice in terms of age, comorbidity and fitness. Appropriate patient selection is essential to safely deliver effective treatment. In this narrative review, we discuss the challenges faced by clinicians when assessing real‑world patients with advanced GOA for systemic therapy. We also highlight the importance of frailty screening and the current available evidence we can use to guide our management.

Gastric cancer is not a top-10 malignancy in the United States but represents one of the most common causes of cancer death worldwide. Biological differences between tumors from Eastern and Western countries add to the complexity of identifying standard-of-care therapy based on international trials. Systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy all have proven efficacy in gastric adenocarcinoma; therefore, multidisciplinary treatment is paramount to treatment selection. Triplet chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer is now accepted and could represent a plateau of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy for localized disease. Classification of gastric cancer based on molecular subtypes is providing an opportunity for personalized therapy. Biomarkers, in particular microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), tumor mutation burden, and Epstein-Barr virus, are increasingly driving systemic therapy approaches and allowing for the identification of populations most likely to benefit from immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Significant research opportunities remain for the less differentiated histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma and those without markers of immunotherapy activity.