Oncogenic mutations in KRAS have been identified in >85% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases, with G12D, G12V, and G12R being the most frequent variants. Using large clinical and genomic databases, this study characterizes prognostic and molecular differences between KRAS variants, focusing on KRASG12D and KRASG12R.

PDAC samples were tested using DNA and RNA sequencing. The MAPK activation score and tumor microenvironment were analyzed from RNA expression data. Real-world overall survival (OS) obtained from insurance claims data was calculated from tissue collection to last contact. Significance was determined by χ2 and Fisher exact tests.

A total of 3,755 patients with PDAC harboring KRASG12D (n = 1,766), KRASG12V (n = 1,294), KRASG12R (n = 621), or KRASG12C (n = 74) variants were identified. Patients with G12R mutations had longer OS compared with those with G12D overall (12.7 vs. 10.1 months; P value = 0.0001), with similar trends in patients treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (13.5 vs. 10.4 months; P value = 0.0002) or FOLFIRINOX (18.3 vs. 14.0 months; P value<0.001). ARID1A and KMT2D mutations were more frequent in the G12D subgroup. Several genes involved in glucose and glutamine metabolism were less expressed in G12R compared with G12D. PD-L1 expression was lower in G12R compared with G12D (13% vs. 19%).

KRAS G12D tumors exhibited a distinct molecular profile compared with G12R tumors, including genes involved in the MAPK pathway, immune activation, and glucose and glutamine metabolism. Patients with G12D mutations had lower OS compared with those with G12R. Based on these data, future studies should address the KRAS mutation status and explore distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern, and understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying CRC progression and prognosis is crucial. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been implicated in various cancers, but their role in CRC and its clinical implications remain to be elucidated.

Transcriptomic data from TCGA of CRC patients were analyzed to assess NETs enrichment and "NETs formation" pathway scores in NETs_high and NETs_low groups. Univariate Cox regression was used to identify prognosis-associated genes with the Log-Rank test for selection. Patients in the TCGA database were randomly split into training and testing sets to build a prognostic model with LASSO Cox regression. Model diagnostic performance was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to determine the abundance of 23 immune cells. ESTIMATE was used to calculate ImmuneScore and ESTIMATEScore, characterizing immune features of CRC samples.

The NETs_high group in CRC showed significantly better survival than the NETs_low group. A robust prognostic model based on PRKRIP1, SERTAD2, ELFN1, and LINC00672 accurately predicted patient outcomes. NETs_high samples exhibited a more enriched immune environment with higher immune cell infiltration levels, as well as ImmuneScore and ESTIMATEScore. PRKRIP1, SERTAD2, ELFN1, and LINC00672 were significantly correlated with key immune cell types. Additionally, 18 drugs displayed differential sensitivity between NETs_high and NETs_low groups, with Daporinad and Selumetinib as potential therapeutic options.

Our findings may catalyze the development of personalized treatment modalities and bestow invaluable insights into the intricate dynamics governing CRC progression.

Preclinical models of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) suggest a synergistic role for combined MEK and autophagy signaling inhibition, as well as MEK and CDK4/6 pathway targeting. Several case reports implicate clinical activity of the combination of either trametinib and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with KRAS-mutant PDAC or trametinib with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with KRAS and CDKN2A/B alterations. However, prospective data from clinical trials is lacking. Here, we aim to provide clinical evidence regarding the use of these experimental regimens in the setting of dedicated precision oncology programs.

In this retrospective case series, PDAC patients who received either trametinib/HCQ (THCQ) or trametinib/palbociclib (TP) were retrospectively identified across 11 participating cancer centers in Germany.

Overall, 34 patients were identified. 19 patients received THCQ, and 15 received TP, respectively. In patients treated with THCQ, the median duration of treatment was 46 days, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52 days and median overall survival (OS) was 68 days. In the THCQ subgroup, all patients evaluable for response (13/19) had progressive disease (PD) within 100 days. In the TP subgroup, the median duration of treatment was 60 days, median PFS was 56 days and median OS was 195 days. In the TP subgroup, 9/15 patients were evaluable for response, of which 1/9 showed a partial response (PR) while 8/9 had PD. One patient achieved a clinical benefit despite progression under TP.

THCQ and TP are not effective in patients with advanced PDAC harboring KRAS mutations or alterations in MAPK/CDKN2A/B.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is recognized as an exceptionally aggressive cancer that both highly lethal and unfavorable prognosis. The mitochondrial metabolism pathway is intimately involved in oncogenesis and tumor progression, however, much remains unknown in this area. In this study, the bioinformatic tools have been used to construct a prognostic model with mitochondrial metabolism-related genes (MMRGs) to evaluate the survival, immune status, mutation profile, and drug sensitivity of PAAD patients.

Univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression were used to screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and multivariate Cox regression was used to develop the risk model. Kaplan-Meier estimator was employed to identify MMRGs signatures associated with overall survival (OS). ROC curves were utilized to evaluate the model's performance. Maftools, immunedeconv and CIBERSORT R packages were applied to analyze the gene mutation profiles and immune status. The corresponding sensitivity to pharmaceutical agents was assessed using oncoPredict R packages.

A prognostic model with five MMRGs was developed, which defined the patients as high-risk showed lower survival rates. There was good consistency among individuals categorized as high-risk, showing elevated rates of genetic alterations, particularly in the TP53 and KRAS genes. Furthermore, these patients exhibited increased levels of immunosuppression, characterized by an increased presence of macrophages, neutrophils, Th2 cells, and regulatory T cells. Additionally, high-risk patients showed increased sensitivity to Sabutoclax and Venetoclax.

By utilizing a gene signature associated with mitochondrial metabolism, a prognostic model has been established which could be a highly efficient method for predicting the outcomes of PAAD patients.

Despite the considerable progress made in cancer treatment through the development of target therapies, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to exhibit resistance to this category of drugs. As a result, chemotherapy combination regimens remain the primary treatment approach for this aggressive cancer.

In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of past and ongoing trials on both well-known and novel targets that are being explored in PDAC, including PARP, EGFR, HER2, KRAS, and its downstream and upstream pathways (such as RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR), JAK/STAT pathway, angiogenesis, metabolisms, epigenetic targets, claudin, and novel targets (such as P53 and plectin). We also provide a comprehensive overview of the significant trials for each target, allowing a thorough glimpse into the past and future of target therapy.

The path toward implementing a target therapy capable of improving the overall survival of PDAC is still long, and it is unlikely that a monotherapy target drug will fulfill a meaningful role in addressing the complexity of this cancer. Thus, we discuss the future direction of target therapies in PDAC, trying to identify the more promising target and combination treatments, with a special focus on the more eagerly awaited ongoing trials.

Sarcopenia and myosteatosis have been associated with a poor prognosis for several cancers. The albumin-myosteatosis gauge (AMG) is a novel integrated measure proposed to assess myosteatosis along with serum albumin level as a surrogate of systemic inflammation and malnutrition. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of AMG in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Patients with advanced PDAC treated with chemotherapy between 2013 and 2022 were evaluated. Skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD) and skeletal muscle index (SMI) were calculated using computed tomography at the level of the L3 vertebra. The AMG was defined as albumin x SMD and expressed as an arbitrary unit (AU). Patients were first categorized by sex-specific quartiles and then dichotomized at the sex-specific median value of the AMG.

A total of 196 patients were included. The median age (interquartile range) was 62 (54-67), and 128 (65.3%) were male. With regard to AMG, 142.86 and 114.15 AU were identified as cutoff values for males and females, respectively. In multivariable analyses, lower AMG values (G1-G2 vs. G3-G4) (HR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.21, p = 0.003), higher ECOG performance score (> 0 vs. 0) (HR: 1.51, 95% CI 1.10-2.06, p = 0.009) and metastatic disease (vs. locally advanced) (HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.27-2.79, p = 0.001) were associated with OS.

The study findings suggest the prognostic value of AMG in patients with advanced PDAC undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess potential predictive role of AMG in guiding treatment selection.

Pancreatic cancer represents a formidable challenge in oncology, primarily due to its aggressive nature and limited therapeutic options. The prognosis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the main form of pancreatic cancer, remains disappointingly poor with a 5-year overall survival of only 5%. Almost 95% of PDAC patients harbor Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) oncogenic mutations. KRAS activates downstream intracellular pathways, most notably the rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling axis. Dysregulation of the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway is a crucial feature of pancreatic cancer and therefore its main components, RAF, MEK and ERK kinases, have been targeted pharmacologically, largely by small-molecule inhibitors. The recent advances in the development of inhibitors not only directly targeting the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway but also indirectly through inhibition of its regulators, such as Src homology-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) and Son of sevenless homolog 1 (SOS1), provide new therapeutic opportunities. Moreover, the discovery of allele-specific small-molecule inhibitors against mutant KRAS variants has brought excitement for successful innovations in the battle against pancreatic cancer. Herein, we review the recent advances in targeted therapy and combinatorial strategies with focus on the current preclinical and clinical approaches, providing critical insight, underscoring the potential of these efforts and supporting their promise to improve the lives of patients with PDAC.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year relative survival rate of less than 10% making it one of the most fatal cancers. A lack of early measures of prognosis, challenges in molecular targeted therapy, ineffective adjuvant chemotherapy, and strong resistance to chemotherapy cumulatively make pancreatic cancer challenging to manage.

The present study aims to enhance understanding of the disease mechanism and its progression by identifying prognostic biomarkers, potential drug targets, and candidate drugs that can be used for therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Gene expression profiles from the GEO database were analyzed to identify reliable prognostic markers and potential drug targets. The disease's molecular mechanism and biological pathways were studied by investigating gene ontologies, KEGG pathways, and survival analysis to understand the strong prognostic power of key DEGs. FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs were screened through cell line databases, and docking studies were performed to identify drugs with high affinity for ARNTL2 and PIK3C2A. Molecular dynamic simulations of drug targets ARNTL2 and PIK3C2A in their native state and complex with nilotinib were carried out for 100 ns to validate their therapeutic potential in PDAC.

Differentially expressed genes that are crucial regulators, including SUN1, PSMG3, PIK3C2A, SCRN1, and TRIAP1, were identified. Nilotinib as a candidate drug was screened using sensitivity analysis on CCLE and GDSC pancreatic cancer cell lines. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed the underlying mechanism of the binding of nilotinib with ARNTL2 and PIK3C2A and the dynamic perturbations. It validated nilotinib as a promising drug for pancreatic cancer.

This study accounts for prognostic markers, drug targets, and repurposed anti-cancer drugs to highlight their usefulness for translational research on developing novel therapies. Our results revealed potential and prospective clinical applications in drug targets ARNTL2, EGFR, and PI3KC2A for pancreatic cancer therapy.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive human tumor that is typically diagnosed at a later stage when surgery is not possible.

We report the case of a 62-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a solitary hepatic lesion and a pancreatic body lesion. The pancreatic body lesion was biopsied endoscopically, and a tissue diagnosis was obtained to confirm the diagnosis of PDAC. She was then treated with 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX with stable disease on CT. Due to the history of a hepatic lesion, she received 11 cycles of gemcitabine/Abraxane and a combination of a MEK inhibitor, Mekinist, and a BRAF inhibitor, BRAFTOVI. Subsequently, the patient underwent a liver biopsy. The biopsy result was negative, and the tumor was deemed resectable. The patient underwent a distal pancreatectomy. Surgical pathology demonstrated a 1.1-cm low-grade papillary mucinous neoplasm with negative margins and lymph nodes, staged T0N0. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not administered.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received prolonged IV and oral chemotherapy. At the time of the operation, the pathological stage was T0N0. The patient has recently been seen 9 months after surgery with no evidence cancer recurrence. Additionally, ctDNA remains negative.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of gene, Poly A-Binding Protein Interacting Protein 2B ( PAIP2B ) in pancreatic cancer. We used the gene expression data and clinical information of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and Gene Expression Omnibus database to analyze the expression of PAIP2B in pancreatic cancer samples, and validated the expression of PAIP2B in tumor tissue, using bioinformatics technology to explore the prognostic value of PAIP2B and its possible biological function. A significantly lower level of PAIP2B was observed in pancreatic cancer patients than in controls, and validated by immunohistochemistry. PAIP2B reduced the proliferation and invasion of cancer cells and had a significantly high expression in early stage. Patients with lower levels of PAIP2B had a significantly shorter median survival time than those with higher levels. DNA demethylation played an important role in PAIP2B expression. In addition, PAIP2B expression was significantly associated with the tumor-infiltrating immune cells, especially T cells CD8, T cells CD4 memory resting, macrophages M0, and dendritic cells resting. Our study also found that PAIP2B regulated miRNA function leading to disease progression in pancreatic cancer patients. Our study explored the potential value of PAIP2B as a biological link between prognosis and pancreatic cancer, and provided reference for the follow-up study on the role of PAIP2B in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a common malignant tumour in the digestive system. Due to the lack of sensitive diagnostic markers, strong metastasis ability, and resistance to anti-cancer drugs, the prognosis of PC is inferior. In the past decades, increasing evidence has indicated that the development of PC is closely related to various signalling pathways. With the exploration of RAS-driven, epidermal growth factor receptor, Hedgehog, NF-κB, TGF-β, and NOTCH signalling pathways, breakthroughs have been made to explore the mechanism of pancreatic carcinogenesis, as well as the novel therapies. In this review, we discussed the signalling pathways involved in PC and summarised current targeted agents in the treatment of PC. Furthermore, opportunities and challenges in the exploration of potential therapies targeting signalling pathways were also highlighted.

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in solid tumors. More than 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are driven by mutations in the KRAS gene, suggesting the importance of targeting this oncogene in PDAC. Initial efforts to target KRAS have been unsuccessful due to its small size, high affinity for guanosine triphosphate/guanosine diphosphate, and lack of distinct drug‑binding pockets. Therefore, much of the focus has been directed at inhibiting the activation of major signaling pathways downstream of KRAS, most notably the PI3K/AKT and RAF/MAPK pathways, using tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. While preclinical studies showed promising results, clinical data using the inhibitors alone and in combination with other standard therapies have shown limited practicality, largely due to the lack of efficacy and dose‑limiting toxicities. Recent therapeutic approaches for KRAS‑driven tumors focus on mutation‑specific drugs such as selective KRASG12C inhibitors and son of sevenless 1 pan‑KRAS inhibitors. While KRASG12C inhibitors showed great promise against patients with non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring KRASG12C mutations, they were not efficacious in PDAC largely because the major KRAS mutant isoforms in PDAC are G12D, G12V, and G12R. As a result, KRASG12D and pan‑KRAS inhibitors are currently under investigation as potential therapeutic options for PDAC. The present review summarized the importance of KRAS oncogenic signaling, challenges in its targeting, and preclinical and clinical targeted agents including recent direct KRAS inhibitors for blocking KRAS signaling in PDAC.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains an important cause of cancer-related mortality, and it is expected to play an even bigger part in cancer burden in the years to come. Despite concerted efforts from scientists and physicians, patients have experienced little improvement in survival over the past decades, possibly because of the non-specific nature of the tested treatment modalities. Recently, the discovery of potentially targetable molecular alterations has paved the way for the personalized treatment of PDAC. Indeed, the central piece in the molecular framework of PDAC is starting to be unveiled. KRAS mutations are seen in 90% of PDACs, and multiple studies have demonstrated their pivotal role in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Recent investigations have shed light on the differences in prognosis as well as therapeutic implications of the different KRAS mutations and disentangled the relationship between KRAS and effectors of downstream and parallel signaling pathways. Additionally, the recognition of other mechanisms involving KRAS-mediated pathogenesis, such as KRAS dosing and allelic imbalance, has contributed to broadening the current knowledge regarding this molecular alteration. Finally, KRAS G12C inhibitors have been recently tested in patients with pancreatic cancer with relative success, and inhibitors of KRAS harboring other mutations are under clinical development. These drugs currently represent a true hope for a meaningful leap forward in this dreadful disease.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the most challenging diseases, with a very poor 5-year overall survival of around 11.5%. Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) mutation is seen in 90%-95% of PC patients and plays an important role in cancer cell proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, and survival, making it an essential mutation for targeted therapy. Despite extensive efforts in studying this oncogene, there has been little success in finding a drug to target this pathway, labelling it for decades as "undruggable". In this article we summarize some of the efforts made to target the KRAS pathway in PC, discuss the challenges, and shed light on promising clinical trials.

Perineural invasion and neurogenesis are frequently observed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and they are associated with a poor prognosis. Axon guidance factor semaphorin 3A (SEMA3A) is upregulated in PDAC. However, it remains unclear whether cancer-derived SEMA3A influences nerve innervation and pancreatic tumorigenesis. In silico analyses were performed using PROGgene and NetworkAnalyst to clarify the importance of SEMA3A and its receptors, plexin A1 (PLXNA1) and neuropilin 2 (NRP2), in pancreatic cancer. In vitro assays, including migration, neurite outgrowth, and 3D recruitment, were performed to study the effects of SEMA3A on neuronal behaviors. Additionally, an orthotopic animal study using C57BL/6 mice was performed to validate the in vitro findings. Expression of SEMA3A and its receptors predicted worse prognosis for PDAC. Cancer-derived SEMA3A promoted neural migration, neurite outgrowth, and neural recruitment. Furthermore, SEMA3A-induced effects depended on PLXNA1, NRP2, and MAPK activation. Trametinib, an approved MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitor, counteracted SEMA3A-enhanced neuronal activity in vitro. Inhibition of SEMA3A by shRNA in pancreatic cancer cells resulted in decreased neural recruitment, tumor growth, and dissemination in vivo. Our results suggested that cancer-secreted SEMA3A plays an important role in promoting neo-neurogenesis and progression of PDAC.

Rat sarcoma (RAS), as a frequently mutated oncogene, has been studied as an attractive target for treating RAS-driven cancers for over four decades. However, it is until the recent success of kirsten-RAS (KRAS)G12C inhibitor that RAS gets rid of the title "undruggable". It is worth noting that the therapeutic effect of KRASG12C inhibitors on different RAS allelic mutations or even different cancers with KRASG12C varies significantly. Thus, deep understanding of the characteristics of each allelic RAS mutation will be a prerequisite for developing new RAS inhibitors. In this review, the structural and biochemical features of different RAS mutations are summarized and compared. Besides, the pathological characteristics and treatment responses of different cancers carrying RAS mutations are listed based on clinical reports. In addition, the development of RAS inhibitors, either direct or indirect, that target the downstream components in RAS pathway is summarized as well. Hopefully, this review will broaden our knowledge on RAS-targeting strategies and trigger more intensive studies on exploiting new RAS allele-specific inhibitors.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the seventh leading cause of cancer death across the world. Poor prognosis of PC is associated with several factors, such as diagnosis at an advanced stage, early distant metastases, and remarkable resistance to most conventional treatment options. The pathogenesis of PC seems to be significantly more complicated than originally assumed, and findings in other solid tumours cannot be extrapolated to this malignancy. To develop effective treatment schemes prolonging patient survival, a multidirectional approach encompassing different aspects of the cancer is needed. Particular directions have been established; however, further studies bringing them all together and connecting the strengths of each therapy are needed. This review summarises the current literature and provides an overview of new or emerging therapeutic strategies for the more effective management of metastatic PC.

There is a need to develop effective therapies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), a highly lethal malignancy with increasing incidence1 and poor prognosis2. Although targeting tumour metabolism has been the focus of intense investigation for more than a decade, tumour metabolic plasticity and high risk of toxicity have limited this anticancer strategy3,4. Here we use genetic and pharmacological approaches in human and mouse in vitro and in vivo models to show that PDA has a distinct dependence on de novo ornithine synthesis from glutamine. We find that this process, which is mediated through ornithine aminotransferase (OAT), supports polyamine synthesis and is required for tumour growth. This directional OAT activity is usually largely restricted to infancy and contrasts with the reliance of most adult normal tissues and other cancer types on arginine-derived ornithine for polyamine synthesis5,6. This dependency associates with arginine depletion in the PDA tumour microenvironment and is driven by mutant KRAS. Activated KRAS induces the expression of OAT and polyamine synthesis enzymes, leading to alterations in the transcriptome and open chromatin landscape in PDA tumour cells. The distinct dependence of PDA, but not normal tissue, on OAT-mediated de novo ornithine synthesis provides an attractive therapeutic window for treating patients with pancreatic cancer with minimal toxicity.

Over the past two decades, elucidation of the genetic defects that underlie cancer has resulted in a plethora of novel targeted cancer drugs. Although these agents can initially be highly effective, resistance to single-agent therapies remains a major challenge. Combining drugs can help avoid resistance, but the number of possible drug combinations vastly exceeds what can be tested clinically, both financially and in terms of patient availability. Rational drug combinations based on a deep understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms associated with therapy resistance are potentially powerful in the treatment of cancer. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies and how effective drug combinations can be identified to combat resistance. The challenges in clinically developing these combinations and future perspectives are considered.

The number of cases of pancreatic cancers in 2019 in Poland was 3852 (approx. 2% of all cancers). The course of the disease is very fast, and the average survival time from the diagnosis is 6 months. Only <2% of patients live for 5 years from the diagnosis, 8% live for 2 years, and almost half live for only about 3 months. A family predisposition to pancreatic cancer occurs in about 10% of cases. Several oncogenes in which somatic changes lead to the development of tumours, including genes BRCA1/2 and PALB2, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, MLL3, TGFBR2, ARID1A and SF3B1, are involved in pancreatic cancer. Between 4% and 10% of individuals with pancreatic cancer will have a mutation in one of these genes. Six percent of patients with pancreatic cancer have NTRK pathogenic fusion. The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer can in many cases be characterised by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-cell inability to effectively repair DNA. It is estimated that from 24% to as many as 44% of pancreatic cancers show HRD. The most common cause of HRD are inactivating mutations in the genes regulating this DNA repair system, mainly BRCA1 and BRCA2, but also PALB2, RAD51C and several dozen others.

Kristen rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene is one of the most common mutated oncogenes in solid tumors. Yet, KRAS inhibitors did not follow suit with the development of targeted therapy, for the structure of KRAS has been considered as being implausible to target for decades. Chemotherapy was the initial recommended therapy for KRAS-mutant cancer patients, which was then replaced by or combined with immunotherapy. KRAS G12C inhibitors became the most recent breakthrough in targeted therapy, with Sotorasib being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on its significant efficacy in multiple clinical studies. However, the subtypes of the KRAS mutations are complex, and the development of inhibitors targeting non-G12C subtypes is still at a relatively early stage. In addition, the monotherapy of KRAS inhibitors has accumulated possible resistance, acquiring the exploration of combination therapies or next-generation KRAS inhibitors. Thus, other non-target, conventional therapies have also been considered as being promising. Here in this review, we went through the characteristics of KRAS mutations in cancer patients, and the prognostic effect that it poses on different therapies and advanced therapeutic strategy, as well as cutting-edge research on the mechanisms of drug resistance, tumor development, and the immune microenvironment.

KRAS variant alleles may have differential biological properties which impact prognosis and therapeutic options in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDA).

We retrospectively identified patients with advanced PDA who received first-line therapy and underwent blood and/or tumor genomic sequencing at the University of Washington between 2013 and 2020. We examined the incidence of KRAS mutation variants with and without co-occurring PI3K or other genomic alterations and evaluated the association of these mutations with clinicopathological characteristics and survival using a Cox proportional hazards model.

One hundred twenty-six patients had genomic sequencing data; KRAS mutations were identified in 111 PDA and included the following variants: G12D (43)/G12V (35)/G12R (23)/other (10). PI3K pathway mutations (26% vs. 8%) and homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) defects (35% vs. 12.5%) were more common among KRAS G12R vs. non-G12R mutated cancers. Patients with KRAS G12R vs. non-G12R cancers had significantly longer overall survival (OS) (HR 0.55) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.58), adjusted for HRR pathway co-mutations among other covariates. Within the KRAS G12R group, co-occurring PI3K pathway mutations were associated with numerically shorter OS (HR 1.58), while no effect was observed on PFS.

Patients with PDA harboring KRAS G12R vs. non-G12R mutations have longer survival, but this advantage was offset by co-occurring PI3K alterations. The KRAS/PI3K genomic profile could inform therapeutic vulnerabilities in patients with PDA.

The RASopathies are a group of clinically defined developmental syndromes caused by germline variants of the RAS/mitogen-activated protein (MAPK) cascade. The prototypic RASopathy is Noonan syndrome, which has phenotypic overlap with related disorders such as cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, Costello syndrome, Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines, and others. In this state-of-the-art review, we summarize current knowledge on unmet therapeutic needs in these diseases and novel treatment approaches informed by insights from RAS/MAPK-associated cancer therapies, in particular through inhibition of MEK1/2 and mTOR in patients with severe disease manifestations. We explore the possibilities of integrating a larger arsenal of molecules currently under development into future care plans. Lastly, we describe both medical and ethical challenges and opportunities for future clinical trials in the field.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest solid organ cancers. In the absence of specific warning symptoms pancreatic cancer is diagnosed notoriously late. Current systemic chemotherapy regimens extend survival by a mere few months. With the advances in genetic, proteomic, and immunological profiling there is strong rationale to test kinase inhibitors to improve outcome.

This review article provides a comprehensive summary of approved treatments and past, present, and future developments of kinase inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Emerging roles of protein kinase inhibitors are discussed in the context of the unique stroma, the lack of high-prevalence therapeutic targets and rapid emergence of acquired resistance, novel immuno-oncology kinase targets, and recent medicinal chemistry advances.

Due to the to-date frequent failure of protein kinase inhibitors indiscriminately administered to unselected pancreatic cancer patients, there is a shift toward the development of these agents in molecularly defined subgroups which are more likely to respond. The development of accurate biomarkers to select patients who are the best candidates based on a detailed understanding of mechanism of action, pro-survival roles, and mediation of resistance of targeted kinases will be critical for the future development of protein kinase inhibitors in this disease.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides information on genetic mutations and mutant allele frequency in tumor specimens. We investigated the prognostic significance of KRAS mutant allele frequency in patients with right-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with surgical resection.

A retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent surgical resection for PDAC and analyzed tumors with an in-house mutational panel. Microdissected samples were studied using an NGS-based assay to detect over 200 hotspot mutations in 42 genes (Pan42) commonly involved in PDAC.

A total of 144 PDAC right-sided surgical patients with a Pan42 panel were evaluated between 2015 and 2020; 121 patients (84%) harbored a KRAS mutation. Detected mutant allele frequencies were categorized as less than 20% (low mKRAS, n = 92) or greater than or equal to 20% (high mKRAS, n = 29). High mKRAS (KRAS ≥ 20%) patients were noted to have shorter disease-free survival after surgery (11.5 ± 2.1 vs. 19.5 ± 3.5 months, p = 0.03), more advanced tumor stage (p = 0.02), larger tumors (3.6 vs. 2.7 cm, p = 0.001), greater tumor cellularity (26% vs. 18%, p = 0.001), and higher rate of distant recurrence (p = 0.03) than low mKRAS patients.

This study demonstrates the importance of KRAS mutant allele frequency on pathological characteristics and prognosis in right-sided PDAC treated with surgery.

Macropinocytosis is a critical route of nutrient acquisition in pancreatic cancer cells. Constitutive macropinocytosis is promoted by mutant KRAS, which activates the PI3Kα lipid kinase and RAC1, to drive membrane ruffling, macropinosome uptake and processing. However, our recent study on the KRAS^G12R mutant indicated the presence of a KRAS-independent mode of macropinocytosis in pancreatic cancer cell lines, thereby increasing the complexity of this process. We found that KRAS^G12R-mutant cell lines promote macropinocytosis independent of KRAS activity using PI3Kγ and RAC1, highlighting the convergence of regulation on RAC signaling. While macropinocytosis has been proposed to be a therapeutic target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, our studies have underscored how little we understand about the activation and regulation of this metabolic process. Therefore, this review seeks to highlight the differences in macropinocytosis regulation in the two cellular subtypes while also highlighting the features that make the KRAS^G12R mutant atypical.

Purpose: The KRAS proto-oncogene is involved in the RAS/MAPK pathway. KRAS is present in the wild type or mutated forms. The oncogene KRAS is frequently mutated in various cancers. At the time that amino acid glycine is mutated, KRAS protein acquires oncogenic properties that result in the tumor cell growth, proliferation, and cancer progression. There has been limited understanding of the different mutations at codon 12. The consequences of such mutations is not fully understood. Various G12X mutations in pancreatic cancer patients have been examined, with the most common mutations being G12D (40%), G12V (30%), and G12R (15-20%). Now we are understanding that G12X mutations in the KRAS are not all equal. Methods: In a single-arm exploratory study, we accrued 13 KRAS-G12X-mutated pancreatic patients (KRAS G12D, G12V, and G12R). They were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of seven patients with G12D and G12V and group 2 included six patients with the KRAS G12R mutation. All patients were treated with the combination of gemcitabine at 1250 mg/m² intravenous weekly for 3 weeks and oral cobimetinib 20 mg b.i.d. for 3 weeks. This was followed by a week of rest before the initiation of the next cycle. Results: In the first cohort, seven patients were on treatment, all of whom progressed and died within the 2 months of the study. In the second cohort, one of six patients achieved partial response, and five achieved stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 6 months (9% confidence interval 3.0-9.3 months) and overall survival has been reached at 8 months. Common adverse reactions included rash, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting (grades 2 and 3). Cancer antigen CA19-9 decreased by >50% in all group 2 patients. Conclusion: Our pancreatic cancer patients were heavily pretreated (all had received FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel) before the entry into our trial. Upon entry into our trial, all patients were treated with the combination of gemcitabine and oral cobimetinib. Therefore, this constituted the second exposure of the patients to gemcitabine. This study illustrates a new discovery, which can potentially target 15-20% of pancreatic cancer patients and allow for a significant improvement in their prognosis. We will be conducting randomized phase II trials to substantiate our findings.

Despite the recent development of new chemotherapeutic regimens and combination strategies, metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) still shows only a modest response to conventional cytotoxic agents. However, several novel therapeutic agents targeting the unique features of mPC are showing promise in clinical trials.

This article reviews the current state of development of new agents targeting various systems and molecular pathways. We searched PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov in September 2021 with a special focus on ongoing early phase clinical trials to identify the promising therapeutic strategies for mPC.

Extensive tumor heterogeneity, complex tumor microenvironment, genetic alterations of the oncogenic signaling pathways, metabolic dysregulation, and a low immunogenicity are hurdles for current treatment approaches. Ongoing research efforts strive to overcome these hurdles and are showing some promising early results.

Performing germline and somatic sequencing in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer can identify potentially targetable genomic aberrations that impact current standard treatment options or eligibility for biomarker-targeted clinical trials. Testing for deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1/2 impacts patient selection for platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and selection of patients who are candidates to receive maintenance therapy with olaparib. Additional germline mutations also similarly introduce potential vulnerabilities to the cancers that arise and may be targeted by clinical trials. Somatic mutation testing also provides opportunities for optimal selection of patients for biomarker-driven clinical trials. Although KRAS mutations are found in 90% to 93% of pancreatic cancers, there are increasing opportunities for therapies against particular mutant KRAS isoforms, especially with the advent of KRAS G12C-specific small molecule inhibitors, and KRAS targeting trials will increasingly require identification of the specific KRAS mutation present. There are also a range of tumor site-agnostic molecular features, such as microsatellite instability and NTRK fusions that, although rarely found in pancreatic cancers, impact selection of patients who have the potential for dramatic benefit with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab or TRK inhibitors such as larotrectinib or entrectinib, respectively, and thus motivate broader somatic mutation and fusion testing for patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancers. Multiple other rare actionable aberrations, particularly gene fusions in the 8% to 10% of KRAS wild-type pancreatic cancers, are also known, and enrollment in basket trials for these rare patient cohorts is highly encouraged.