Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2026; 17(3): 122448
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.122448
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.122448
Table 1 Key antimicrobial peptides: Structural classes, mechanisms, molecular targets, and gastrointestinal relevance
| AMP | Structural class | Primary mechanism(s) | Molecular target(s) | GI relevance | Ref. |
| HD-5, HD-6 | α-Defensin | Membrane disruption; microbiome shaping via crypt gradients | Lipid II (HD-5); self-assembly nets (HD-6) | Paneth cell-derived; reduced in ileal Crohn’s disease | [4,14] |
| hBD-2 | β-Defensin (inducible) | Membrane disruption; CCR6-mediated chemotaxis | Lipid II; CCR6 | NF-κB-induced in IBD epithelium; inducible barrier | [4,5] |
| LL-37 | Cathelicidin (α-helix) | Membrane disruption; DNA binding; receptor-mediated signalling | FPR2/ALX (approximately 200 nM), EGFR, TLR9 via DNA | Wound healing; context-dependent pro-/anti-tumour in CRC | [17,21] |
| Buforin II | α-Helix (proline hinge) | Non-lytic entry; DNA/RNA binding | dsDNA minor groove; rRNA | Model for resistance-refractory intracellular targeting | [5,9] |
| Nisin | Lantibiotic (cyclic) | Lipid II sequestration and pore formation | Lipid II pyrophosphate (approximately 1 nM) | Narrow-spectrum; resistance-resistant dual-mechanism paradigm | [2,20] |
| Microcin J25 | Lasso peptide | RNA polymerase inhibition; membrane-independent | RNA polymerase β-subunit | Efficacious in DSS-induced colitis; selective microbiome modulator | [22] |
| CRAMP | Cathelicidin (α-helix) | Membrane disruption; FPR2/ALX immunomodulation | Microbial membranes; FPR2/ALX | Anti-inflammatory in murine colitis; restores diversity | [23] |
Table 2 Preclinical studies of antimicrobial peptide activity in gastrointestinal and related disease models
| No. | Ref. | Peptide | Model / route | Dose | Key findings | Sig. |
| 1 | Moghaddam et al[49] | CM11; CM15 (cecropin-melittin hybrids) | In vitro: P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, V. cholerae, A. baumannii, E. coli (ATCC and clinical) | MIC 4 mg/L; MBC 16 mg/L | Complete kill at 30-40 minutes; CM11 MIC/MBC stable at 48 hours; CM15 MIC doubled at 48 hours | P < 0.05 |
| 2 | Shang et al[22] | MccJ25 (lasso peptide, 21-aa) | DSS-induced UC; C57BL/6J/oral gavage | 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg | ↓ DAI, ↑ colon length; ↓ TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6; ↑ TJ proteins; ↑ Lactobacillus, ↓ Bacteroides and Akkermansia; co-housing confirmed microbiota as key mechanism | P < 0.05 |
| 3 | Jiang et al[23] | CRAMP (cathelicidin-related; murine LL-37 homologue) | 3% DSS-induced acute UC; C57BL/6J/IP | 4 mg/kg/day | ↑ body weight, ↑ colon length, ↓ DAI, ↓ MPO; ↑ TJ proteins; ↓ IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, CRP; ↑ GSH-PX, ↓ MDA; ↑ Verrucomicrobiota | P < 0.05-0.001 |
| 4 | Liu et al[44] | Abaecin (proline-rich, bee-derived; non-lytic) | 2.5% DSS-induced acute UC; C57BL/6J/rectal | 5 mg/kg | ↑ colon length and body weight, ↓ DAI; ↓ LPS, D-LA, DAO; ↓ IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ (IL-10 unchanged); ↑ ZO-1, occludin, claudin-1; ↓ NF-κB/MAPK; ↓ Bacteroides, Barnesiella, Escherichia, ↑ Lactobacillus | P < 0.05-0.01 |
| 5 | Sun et al[45] | Chensinin-1b (from R. chensinensis) | RAW264.7 + LPS (in vitro) and 4% DSS-induced UC; BALB/c/IP | 10-40 μmol/L; 1.5 and 3 mg/kg | ↓ M1 markers (TNF-α, IL-6, NO, CD86), ↑ M2 markers (IL-10, TGF-β1, Arg-1, CD206); ↓ NF-κB/MAPK; ↑ body weight and colon length, ↓ DAI; high dose superior to cyclosporine A | P < 0.05-0.01 |
| 6 | Zhao et al[43] | DP7 (12-aa; machine-learning designed) | 4% DSS-induced UC (multi-arm: FMT, antibiotic, pseudo-germ-free); C57BL/6/IV | 0.5 mg/kg q2d | ↓ weight loss, ↓ DAI, ↑ colon length; ↑ ZO-1, claudin-1, occludin; ↓ IL-1β, IL-6, ↑ IL-10; ↑ Muribaculaceae; DP7-FMT > DSS-FMT, immune effects microbiota-dependent | P < 0.05-0.0001 |
| 7 | Sun et al[46] | R7I (IRPI × 7; anti-proteolytic; trypsin/chymotrypsin/pepsin-resistant) | E. coli ATCC 25922 enteritis; C57BL/6/oral gavage | 20 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg | ↓ intestinal and hepatic inflammation, restored barrier; modulated microbiota (↓ Clostridia, ↑ Odoribacteraceae); normalised gut metabolites | P < 0.05 |
Table 3 Clinical studies of antimicrobial peptide-based interventions
| No. | AMP | Indication | Phase | Design /groups | Key findings | Safety | Ref. |
| 1 | Pexiganan (MSI-78) | Infected diabetic foot ulcers | 3 | 2 double-blind RCTs; pexiganan 1% cream vs oral ofloxacin vs placebo (n = 835) | Cream equivalent to ofloxacin (85%-90% improvement; 42%-47% eradication); no pexiganan resistance (ofloxacin resistance emerged); study 304 + combined met equivalence, study 303 failed | Well tolerated; no systemic toxicity | [19] |
| 2 | Iseganan (IB-367; protegrin-1 analogue) | Oral mucositis (stomatotoxic chemotherapy) | 3 | Double-blind RCT; iseganan 9 mg oral rinse 6 ×/day vs placebo (n = 323; 163 vs 160) | Primary endpoint (UOM prevention by day 21) not met: 43% vs 33% UOM-free (P = 0.067); significant reductions in peak mouth pain (P = 0.041), peak throat pain (P = 0.048), and NCI CTC stomatitis (P = 0.013) | Well tolerated; no systemic absorption | [60] |
| 3 | Iseganan (IB-367) | Oral mucositis (radiotherapy, H&N cancer) | 3 | Double-blind 3-arm RCT; iseganan + SOC vs placebo + SOC vs SOC (n = 545) | OM prevention not met (9% vs 9% OM-free, P = 0.998); both intervention arms > SOC alone; benefit attributed to oral hygiene/vehicle, not AMP | Nausea higher with iseganan (51%); no systemic absorption | [59] |
| 4 | hLF1-11 (lactoferrin 1-11) | Infection prevention, autologous HSCT | 1 | Open-label single 5-mg IV dose in autologous HSCT recipients (n = 8; part of a 3-study first-in-human programme, total n = 56) | Well tolerated; no immunogenicity (no anti-hLF1-11 IgG/IgE); IL-6/TNF-α attenuation trend on LPS stimulation (NS); safety/PD only; PK not determinable (peptide unquantifiable in plasma), no efficacy data | No serious drug-related AEs; reversible transaminase rise | [54] |
| 5 | LTX-109 (Lytixar; peptidomimetic) | Nasal MRSA/MSSA carriage | 1/2a | Dose-escalating vehicle-controlled; 1%, 2%, 5% nasal gel TID × 3 days | Significant decolonisation below detection limit at 2% and 5% doses from day 2 (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.0012 vs vehicle, respectively) and sustained through day 4 (P = 0.0180 and P = 0.0105); 1% dose showed reduction from day 1 but did not reach significance vs vehicle; effect not durable; recolonisation occurred in all but one subject by approximately 5 days post-treatment, with no significant difference vs vehicle from baseline to week 9 (P = 0.2754); low resistance propensity supported by preclinical/mechanistic data, not demonstrated in this trial; minimal systemic absorption (Cmax 3.72–11.7 ng/mL in the 5% group; undetectable by 1 week) | No systemic issues; minor reversible local lesions | [55] |
| 6 | Dusquetide (SGX942; IDR pentapeptide) | Severe oral mucositis (H&N CRT) | 2 (Ph 3 failed) | Double-blind dose-escalating RCT; 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg IV twice weekly vs placebo (n = 111) | In overall population: 50% ↓ severe OM duration, 18 to 9 days (67% ↓ in high-risk cisplatin subgroup, 30 → 10 days, P = 0.04); 39% ↓ AUC (WHO Grade-time score); 71% ↓ SOM rate at 1-month follow-up; ↓ infection rate; 7% relative ↓ in SOM incidence: 74% → 69% | No dose-limiting toxicity; AEs consistent with CRT | [64] |
| 7 | Omiganan (CLS001) | Atopic dermatitis (mild-moderate) | 2 | Double-blind vehicle-controlled; 1%, 1.75%, 2.5% gel BID × 28 days (n = 80) | 93.5% S. aureus reduction at 2.5% (P = 0.02); dysbiosis recovered; clinical EASI/SCORAD not met; microbiome normalisation insufficient for symptom relief | No systemic AEs; good local tolerability | [56] |
| 8 | Omiganan (CLS001) | Facial seborrheic dermatitis | 2 | 3-arm RCT; omiganan 1.75% vs ketoconazole 2% vs placebo BID × 4 weeks | Omiganan showed no improvement vs placebo (SDASI P = 0.143, IGA P = 0.097, %BSA P = 0.522) and did not significantly reduce Malassezia (-3.7%, P = 0.563), explaining the failure; staphylococcus declined in all arms including placebo with no omiganan-specific effect (not a primary driver); ketoconazole met all clinical endpoints (SDASI P = 0.025, IGA P = 0.005, %BSA P = 0.005) with reduced Malassezia and restored barrier function | Mild application-site reactions; no systemic AEs | [57] |
| 9 | Omiganan (CLS001) | HPV anogenital warts and vulvar HSIL | 2 | Two concurrent vehicle-controlled RCTs; 2.5% gel QD × 12 weeks (n = 36) | First demonstration of topical AMP antiviral activity in HPV-induced disease: Significant reduction in HPV viral load in AGW patients (-96.6%; 95%CI: -99.9 to -7.4%; P = 0.045), but no significant difference in lesion clearance or wart count/size vs placebo (near-significant trend in wart height reduction, -30.3%, P = 0.054). In the vulvar HSIL arm, no significant difference in viral load or lesion response vs placebo. Reduction in viral load did not translate into clinically meaningful lesion regression in either indication | No serious AEs; excellent local tolerability | [58] |
| 10 | Oral LL-37 (CAS001; via GMO L. lactis) | COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5.1.3) | 2 | Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center; Oral LL-37 vs L. lactis placebo (n = 238; 129 vs 109); early (≤ 6 days) vs late (≥ 7 days) initiation | Significantly shortened nucleic-acid negative conversion time when started early (9.80 days vs 14.04 days, P = 0.0044; early vs placebo HR 2.427, P = 0.0097); early > late initiation; LL-37 acts via viral envelope disruption (and ACE2 blockade) | No serious AEs; no systemic toxicity | [63] |
- Citation: Selvaraj K, Girish C. Emerging antimicrobial peptides in gastrointestinal disorders: Dual role in immunity and therapy. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2026; 17(3): 122448
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v17/i3/122448.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.122448