BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2026; 17(3): 122448
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.122448
Table 1 Key antimicrobial peptides: Structural classes, mechanisms, molecular targets, and gastrointestinal relevance
AMP
Structural class
Primary mechanism(s)
Molecular target(s)
GI relevance
Ref.
HD-5, HD-6α-DefensinMembrane disruption; microbiome shaping via crypt gradientsLipid II (HD-5); self-assembly nets (HD-6)Paneth cell-derived; reduced in ileal Crohn’s disease[4,14]
hBD-2β-Defensin (inducible)Membrane disruption; CCR6-mediated chemotaxisLipid II; CCR6NF-κB-induced in IBD epithelium; inducible barrier[4,5]
LL-37Cathelicidin (α-helix)Membrane disruption; DNA binding; receptor-mediated signallingFPR2/ALX (approximately 200 nM), EGFR, TLR9 via DNAWound healing; context-dependent pro-/anti-tumour in CRC[17,21]
Buforin IIα-Helix (proline hinge)Non-lytic entry; DNA/RNA bindingdsDNA minor groove; rRNAModel for resistance-refractory intracellular targeting[5,9]
NisinLantibiotic (cyclic)Lipid II sequestration and pore formationLipid II pyrophosphate (approximately 1 nM)Narrow-spectrum; resistance-resistant dual-mechanism paradigm[2,20]
Microcin J25Lasso peptideRNA polymerase inhibition; membrane-independentRNA polymerase β-subunitEfficacious in DSS-induced colitis; selective microbiome modulator[22]
CRAMPCathelicidin (α-helix)Membrane disruption; FPR2/ALX immunomodulationMicrobial membranes; FPR2/ALXAnti-inflammatory in murine colitis; restores diversity[23]
Table 2 Preclinical studies of antimicrobial peptide activity in gastrointestinal and related disease models
No.
Ref.
Peptide
Model / route
Dose
Key findings
Sig.
1Moghaddam et al[49]CM11; CM15 (cecropin-melittin hybrids)In vitro: P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, V. cholerae, A. baumannii, E. coli (ATCC and clinical)MIC 4 mg/L; MBC 16 mg/LComplete kill at 30-40 minutes; CM11 MIC/MBC stable at 48 hours; CM15 MIC doubled at 48 hoursP < 0.05
2Shang et al[22]MccJ25 (lasso peptide, 21-aa)DSS-induced UC; C57BL/6J/oral gavage5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg↓ DAI, ↑ colon length; ↓ TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6; ↑ TJ proteins; ↑ Lactobacillus, ↓ Bacteroides and Akkermansia; co-housing confirmed microbiota as key mechanismP < 0.05
3Jiang et al[23]CRAMP (cathelicidin-related; murine LL-37 homologue)3% DSS-induced acute UC; C57BL/6J/IP4 mg/kg/day↑ body weight, ↑ colon length, ↓ DAI, ↓ MPO; ↑ TJ proteins; ↓ IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, CRP; ↑ GSH-PX, ↓ MDA; ↑ VerrucomicrobiotaP < 0.05-0.001
4Liu et al[44]Abaecin (proline-rich, bee-derived; non-lytic)2.5% DSS-induced acute UC; C57BL/6J/rectal5 mg/kg↑ colon length and body weight, ↓ DAI; ↓ LPS, D-LA, DAO; ↓ IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ (IL-10 unchanged); ↑ ZO-1, occludin, claudin-1; ↓ NF-κB/MAPK; ↓ Bacteroides, Barnesiella, Escherichia, ↑ LactobacillusP < 0.05-0.01
5Sun et al[45]Chensinin-1b (from R. chensinensis)RAW264.7 + LPS (in vitro) and 4% DSS-induced UC; BALB/c/IP10-40 μmol/L; 1.5 and 3 mg/kg↓ M1 markers (TNF-α, IL-6, NO, CD86), ↑ M2 markers (IL-10, TGF-β1, Arg-1, CD206); ↓ NF-κB/MAPK; ↑ body weight and colon length, ↓ DAI; high dose superior to cyclosporine AP < 0.05-0.01
6Zhao et al[43]DP7 (12-aa; machine-learning designed)4% DSS-induced UC (multi-arm: FMT, antibiotic, pseudo-germ-free); C57BL/6/IV0.5 mg/kg q2d↓ weight loss, ↓ DAI, ↑ colon length; ↑ ZO-1, claudin-1, occludin; ↓ IL-1β, IL-6, ↑ IL-10; ↑ Muribaculaceae; DP7-FMT > DSS-FMT, immune effects microbiota-dependentP < 0.05-0.0001
7Sun et al[46]R7I (IRPI × 7; anti-proteolytic; trypsin/chymotrypsin/pepsin-resistant)E. coli ATCC 25922 enteritis; C57BL/6/oral gavage20 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg↓ intestinal and hepatic inflammation, restored barrier; modulated microbiota (↓ Clostridia, ↑ Odoribacteraceae); normalised gut metabolitesP < 0.05
Table 3 Clinical studies of antimicrobial peptide-based interventions
No.
AMP
Indication
Phase
Design /groups
Key findings
Safety
Ref.
1Pexiganan (MSI-78)Infected diabetic foot ulcers32 double-blind RCTs; pexiganan 1% cream vs oral ofloxacin vs placebo (n = 835)Cream equivalent to ofloxacin (85%-90% improvement; 42%-47% eradication); no pexiganan resistance (ofloxacin resistance emerged); study 304 + combined met equivalence, study 303 failedWell tolerated; no systemic toxicity[19]
2Iseganan (IB-367; protegrin-1 analogue)Oral mucositis (stomatotoxic chemotherapy)3Double-blind RCT; iseganan 9 mg oral rinse 6 ×/day vs placebo (n = 323; 163 vs 160)Primary endpoint (UOM prevention by day 21) not met: 43% vs 33% UOM-free (P = 0.067); significant reductions in peak mouth pain (P = 0.041), peak throat pain (P = 0.048), and NCI CTC stomatitis (P = 0.013)Well tolerated; no systemic absorption[60]
3Iseganan (IB-367)Oral mucositis (radiotherapy, H&N cancer)3Double-blind 3-arm RCT; iseganan + SOC vs placebo + SOC vs SOC (n = 545)OM prevention not met (9% vs 9% OM-free, P = 0.998); both intervention arms > SOC alone; benefit attributed to oral hygiene/vehicle, not AMPNausea higher with iseganan (51%); no systemic absorption[59]
4hLF1-11 (lactoferrin 1-11)Infection prevention, autologous HSCT1Open-label single 5-mg IV dose in autologous HSCT recipients (n = 8; part of a 3-study first-in-human programme, total n = 56)Well tolerated; no immunogenicity (no anti-hLF1-11 IgG/IgE); IL-6/TNF-α attenuation trend on LPS stimulation (NS); safety/PD only; PK not determinable (peptide unquantifiable in plasma), no efficacy dataNo serious drug-related AEs; reversible transaminase rise[54]
5LTX-109 (Lytixar; peptidomimetic)Nasal MRSA/MSSA carriage1/2aDose-escalating vehicle-controlled; 1%, 2%, 5% nasal gel TID × 3 daysSignificant decolonisation below detection limit at 2% and 5% doses from day 2 (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.0012 vs vehicle, respectively) and sustained through day 4 (P = 0.0180 and P = 0.0105); 1% dose showed reduction from day 1 but did not reach significance vs vehicle; effect not durable; recolonisation occurred in all but one subject by approximately 5 days post-treatment, with no significant difference vs vehicle from baseline to week 9 (P = 0.2754); low resistance propensity supported by preclinical/mechanistic data, not demonstrated in this trial; minimal systemic absorption (Cmax 3.72–11.7 ng/mL in the 5% group; undetectable by 1 week)No systemic issues; minor reversible local lesions[55]
6Dusquetide (SGX942; IDR pentapeptide)Severe oral mucositis (H&N CRT)2 (Ph 3 failed)Double-blind dose-escalating RCT; 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg IV twice weekly vs placebo (n = 111)In overall population: 50% ↓ severe OM duration, 18 to 9 days (67% ↓ in high-risk cisplatin subgroup, 30 → 10 days, P = 0.04); 39% ↓ AUC (WHO Grade-time score); 71% ↓ SOM rate at 1-month follow-up; ↓ infection rate; 7% relative ↓ in SOM incidence: 74% → 69%No dose-limiting toxicity; AEs consistent with CRT[64]
7Omiganan (CLS001)Atopic dermatitis (mild-moderate)2Double-blind vehicle-controlled; 1%, 1.75%, 2.5% gel BID × 28 days (n = 80)93.5% S. aureus reduction at 2.5% (P = 0.02); dysbiosis recovered; clinical EASI/SCORAD not met; microbiome normalisation insufficient for symptom reliefNo systemic AEs; good local tolerability[56]
8Omiganan (CLS001)Facial seborrheic dermatitis23-arm RCT; omiganan 1.75% vs ketoconazole 2% vs placebo BID × 4 weeksOmiganan showed no improvement vs placebo (SDASI P = 0.143, IGA P = 0.097, %BSA P = 0.522) and did not significantly reduce Malassezia (-3.7%, P = 0.563), explaining the failure; staphylococcus declined in all arms including placebo with no omiganan-specific effect (not a primary driver); ketoconazole met all clinical endpoints (SDASI P = 0.025, IGA P = 0.005, %BSA P = 0.005) with reduced Malassezia and restored barrier functionMild application-site reactions; no systemic AEs[57]
9Omiganan (CLS001)HPV anogenital warts and vulvar HSIL2Two concurrent vehicle-controlled RCTs; 2.5% gel QD × 12 weeks (n = 36)First demonstration of topical AMP antiviral activity in HPV-induced disease: Significant reduction in HPV viral load in AGW patients (-96.6%; 95%CI: -99.9 to -7.4%; P = 0.045), but no significant difference in lesion clearance or wart count/size vs placebo (near-significant trend in wart height reduction, -30.3%, P = 0.054). In the vulvar HSIL arm, no significant difference in viral load or lesion response vs placebo. Reduction in viral load did not translate into clinically meaningful lesion regression in either indicationNo serious AEs; excellent local tolerability[58]
10Oral LL-37 (CAS001; via GMO L. lactis)COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5.1.3)2Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center; Oral LL-37 vs L. lactis placebo (n = 238; 129 vs 109); early (≤ 6 days) vs late (≥ 7 days) initiationSignificantly shortened nucleic-acid negative conversion time when started early (9.80 days vs 14.04 days, P = 0.0044; early vs placebo HR 2.427, P = 0.0097); early > late initiation; LL-37 acts via viral envelope disruption (and ACE2 blockade)No serious AEs; no systemic toxicity[63]


Write to the Help Desk